Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Stepping down from OpenStack-Ansible core
On 30/08/18 18:40, Andy McCrae wrote: > Now that Rocky is all but ready it seems like a good time! Since > changing roles I've not been able to keep up enough focus on reviews and > other obligations - so I think it's time to step aside as a core reviewer. > > I want to say thanks to everybody in the community, I'm really proud to > see the work we've done and how the OSA team has grown. I've learned a > tonne from all of you - it's definitely been a great experience. > > Thanks, > Andy > > Hello Andy, It is sad to see you go. Thank you very much for everything you've done for OpenStack-Ansible and for trusting me as a core reviewer when I still was relatively a new to the project. Best of luck on your new role :) -- markos SUSE LINUX GmbH | GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409, Nürnberg __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Proposing Jonathan Rosser as core reviewer
On 07/30/2018 11:16 AM, jean-phili...@evrard.me wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I'd like to propose Jonathan Rosser (jrosser) as core reviewer for > OpenStack-Ansible. > The BBC team [1] has been very active recently across the board, but worked > heavily in our ops repo, making sure the experience is complete for operators. > > I value Jonathan's opinion (I remember the storage backend conversations for > lxc/systemd-nspawn!), and I'd like this positive trend to continue. On top of > it Jonathan has been recently reviewing quite a series of patches, and is > involved into some of our important work: bringing the Bionic support. > > Best regards, > Jean-Philippe Evrard (evrardjp) +1 Jonathan will be a valuable addition to the project. -- markos SUSE LINUX GmbH | GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409, Nürnberg __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [docs][openstack-ansible]
On 09/05/18 14:13, Alexandra Settle wrote: > Hi all, > > > > It is with a super heavy heart I have to say that I need to step down as > core from the OpenStack-Ansible and Documentation teams – and take a > step back from the community. I am sorry to see you go Alex. Thank you for all your work in the OSA world :) I hope you have fun on your next adventure! -- markos SUSE LINUX GmbH | GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409, Nürnberg __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Implement rotations for meetings handling
On 03/05/18 09:13, Andy McCrae wrote: > > > I will gladly pick up my well-used meeting chair hat. > It's a great idea, I think it would help make our meetings more productive. > Once you've been chair you have a different view of how the meetings work. > > Andy I too think this is a great idea +1 -- markos SUSE LINUX GmbH | GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409, Nürnberg __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Proposing Mohammed Naser as core reviewer
On 24/04/18 16:05, Jean-Philippe Evrard wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I’d like to propose Mohammed Naser [1] as a core reviewer for > OpenStack-Ansible. > +2 -- markos SUSE LINUX GmbH | GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409, Nürnberg __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] Going but not gone
On 03/09/2018 01:54 PM, Major Hayden wrote: > Hello there, > > I'm leaving my current role for a new opportunity and, unfortunately, this > means I won't be as involved in OpenStack as much in the near future. I've > spoken with our fearless OpenStack-Ansible PTL and I let JP know that I will > resign from the core reviewers group immediately if I feel that I cannot meet > the obligations of the role. > > With that said, the OpenStack community has been truly amazing. My first > humble contribution[0] was a fix for broken glance tests back in 2011. I've > done a little more since then and I'm proud to be a tiny part of what > OpenStack has become today. > > I'd like to thank everyone who has reviewed one of my patches, fixed one of > the bugs I created with my patches, and fixed the gate jobs that I broke with > my patches. Thanks to everyone who has attended one of my talks at the > Summits and thanks to everyone who has put up with my oddball suggestions at > Design Summits, Forums, and PTGs. I have learned an *incredible* amount about > OpenStack, Python, Linux, open source, communities, and how to be a better > human. > > Thanks to the leaders of the OpenStack Foundation as well for their continued > support. They have been excellent listeners and they took lots of time to > consider my suggestions for improvements. > > I love you all and working in this community has been one of the best > experiences in my professional career. :) > > [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/2652/ Hello Major, I wish you all the best on your new adventure! It's been a real pleasure working with you (virtually or during the PTG) fixing all sort of strange bugs. I hope you will still find some time to come and fix CentOS in OSA whenever necessary :) -- markos SUSE LINUX GmbH | GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409, Nürnberg __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] problems with bringing up openstack in AIO flavor with OVS
Hello, On 04/01/18 10:29, Periyasamy Palanisamy wrote: > Hi OSA Experts, > > > > I’m trying to bring up openstack using openstack-ansible in AIO flavor > by having neutron ml2 plugin set to ovs. > > OSA is being executed from OPNFV XCI deployer with attached > openstack_user_config and user_variables*.yml files. > Would it be possible to try and reproduce it with the openstack-ansible master branch? That will make our lives easier since we could eliminate all the XCI specific layers. -- markos SUSE LINUX GmbH | GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409, Nürnberg __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][tempest] "Ensure tempest image" failing
Hi Lawrence, On 08/09/17 10:57, Lawrence J. Albinson wrote: > Dear Colleagues, > > I have just noticed that the short-form tempest run at the end of an > openstack-ansible installation is failing with the following error: > [...] > \"/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/shade/openstackcloud.py\", line > 403, in _get_versioned_client\n shade_logger=self.log)\n File > \"/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/shade/_adapter.py\", line 87, > in __init__\n super(ShadeAdapter, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs)\n > File \"/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/positional/__init__.py\", > line 101, in inner\n return wrapped(*args, **kwargs)\nTypeError: > __init__() got an unexpected keyword argument 'min_version'\n", > "module_stdout": "", "msg": "MODULE FAILURE"} > > The message "got an unexpected keyword argument 'min_version'" seems to > suggest some recent change to the ansible module os-image. Before I go > looking too deep though, has anyone else seen this please? > > Kind regards, Lawrence Albinson > Are you on master or stable/pike? It appears that the problem is in the 'shade' package and there have been some changes on that front recently https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:pin_shade is your branch up to date? If not, could you update it and try again? -- markos SUSE LINUX GmbH | GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409, Nürnberg __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Ansible] Not running for Queens PTL
On 07/31/2017 12:48 PM, Andy McCrae wrote: > Following on from last week's meeting - I've had 2 cycles as PTL for > OSA, which has been a really great experience - we've achieved a lot and > built on the strong base we had, which I'm really proud of. I strongly > believe that inviting a fresh perspective and new ideas as PTL is a > winning strategy - it's served us well so far, and in line with previous > PTLs I won't be standing for a 3rd cycle. > > Looking forward to assisting the next PTL, and helping to continue to > mature and improve the project! > > Thanks! > Andy > > Even though I am relatively new to this project, I can definitely recognize and appreciate your huge efforts both on the technical and social side which made this project so popular. I am glad you will still be around :) -- markos SUSE LINUX GmbH | GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409, Nürnberg __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][security] To firewalld, or not to firewalld
On 07/26/2017 05:59 PM, Major Hayden wrote: > > firewalld disadvantages > --- > 1) Different distributions have different base rule sets Also different distributions offer different version of firewalld which means different behavior and possibly bugs between them. The Ansible module may not always 'mask' such things we either going to spend time improving the module or workaround all these in our playbooks. Improving the upstream module of course is a good thing but I just wanted to point out the maintenance cost of that. > 2) Medium/High complexity rules require --direct, which is like using > iptables anyway > 3) It's another daemon to manage/monitor > 4) We wouldn't be able to use firewalld's "zones" very heavily > 5) Saving/restoring iptables rules is battle-tested already I am slightly in favor of iptables (or even nftables) mostly because they provide a stable known interface which can work for simple and complex rules. As your 2nd point above correctly states, if we start using the 'direct' rule feature of firewalld, then we will end up having a mixture of pure firewalld and iptables rules which may not be the cleaner option in terms of maintainability. -- markos SUSE LINUX GmbH | GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409, Nürnberg __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
