[openstack-dev] [Mistral][Horizon][Tuskar-ui] Mistral Dashboard
Hi folks, As Horizon is moving towards an Angular application, I think it's high time that we should make a standard for other projects which want to horizon compatible on whether they should based on Angular Dashboard or the current Horizon framework. For new project, I think it makes more sense to build the dashboard on Angular. But for old project like Mistral-Dashboard and Tuskar-UI, they works fine with Django framework now, do they have to move towards Angular also, and when that should be done. -zhenguo __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [cinder][oslo] Locks for create from volume/snapshot
Hi folks, Currently we use a lockfile to protect the create operations from concurrent delete the source volume/snapshot, we use exclusive locks on both delete and create sides which will ensure that: 1. If a create of VolA from snap/VolB is in progress, any delete requests for snap/VolB will wait until the create is complete. 2. If a delete of snap/VolA is in progress, any create from snap/VolA will wait until snap/VolA delete is complte. but, the exclusive locks will also result in: 3. If a create of VolA from snap/VolB is inprogress, any other create requests from snap/VolB will wait until the create is complete. So the create operations from same volume/snapshot can not process on parallel, please reference bp [1]. I'd like to change the current filelock or introduce a new lock to oslo.concurrency. Proposed change: Add exclusive(write) locks for delete operations and shared(read) locks for create operations, to ensure that create from volume/snapshot can work on parallel and protect create operations from concurrent delete the source volume/snapshot. I'd like to get what's your suggestions, thanks in advance. [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/enhance-locks -zhenguo __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum][horizon] Making a dashboard for Magnum - need a vote from the core team
Hi folks, How is the project going? openstack/magnum-ui is still empty for now. -zhenguo From: Bradley Jones (bradjone) [mailto:bradj...@cisco.com] Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 6:31 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum][horizon] Making a dashboard for Magnum - need a vote from the core team The review for the creation of the new project is here https://review.openstack.org/190998 To confirm Adrian, do you intend to use the Magnum launchpad for UI related bps and bugs or the Magnum UI launchpad indicated in the spec (https://launchpad.net/magnum-ui)? If it's the former I shall update the spec to indicate so. Thanks, Brad On 12 Jun 2015, at 03:21, Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.commailto:adrian.o...@rackspace.com wrote: Team, We are fortunate enough to have a thriving community of developers who want to make OpenStack great, and several of us have pledged support for this work in Magnum. Due to the amount of interest expressed in this pursuit, and the small amount of overlap between the developers in magnum-core, I'm authorizing the creation of a new gerrit ACL group named magnum-ui-core. Please install me as the pilot member of the group. I will seed the group with those who have pledged support for the effort from the essential subscribers to the following blueprint. If our contributors to the magnum-ui repo feel that review velocity is too low, I will add magnum-core as a member so we can help. On regular intervals, I will review the activity level of our new group, and make adjustments as needed to add/subtract from it in accordance with input from the active contributors. We will use the Magnum project on Launchpad for blueprints and bugs. https://blueprints.launchpad.net/magnum/+spec/magnum-horizon-plugin There are 8 contributors identified, who will comprise our initial magnum-ui-core group. I ask that the ACLs be configured as follows: [access refs/heads/*] abandon = group magnum-ui-core create = group magnum-milestone label-Code-Review = -2..+2 group magnum-ui-core label-Workflow = -1..+1 group magnum-ui-core [access refs/tags/*] pushSignedTag = group magnum-milestone [receive] requireChangeId = true requireContributorAgreement = true [submit] mergeContent = true Thanks everyone for your enthusiasm about this new pursuit. I look forward to working together with you to make this into something we are all proud of. Adrian PS: Special thanks to sdake for initiating this conversation, and helping us to arrive at a well reasoned decision about how to approach this. On Jun 4, 2015, at 10:58 AM, Steven Dake (stdake) std...@cisco.commailto:std...@cisco.com wrote: Hey folks, I think it is critical for self-service needs that we have a Horizon dashboard to represent Magnum. I know the entire Magnum team has no experience in UI development, but I have found atleast one volunteer Bradley Jones to tackle the work. I am looking for more volunteers to tackle this high impact effort to bring Containers to OpenStack either in the existing Magnum core team or as new contributors. If your interested, please chime in on this thread. As far as how to get patches approved, there are two models we can go with. Option #1: We add these UI folks to the magnum-core team and trust them not to +2/+A Magnum infrastructure code. This also preserves us as one team with one mission. Option #2: We make a new core team magnum-ui-core. This presents special problems if the UI contributor team isn't large enough to get reviews in. I suspect Option #2 will be difficult to execute. Cores, please vote on Option #1, or Option #2, and Adrian can make a decision based upon the results. Regards -steve __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic][Horizon][Tuskar-ui] Making a dashboard for Ironic
Hi folks, I must admit that I'll drop my efforts of making the ironic dashboard, as ironic-webclient has been developed with the support of Ironic community, and now trying to add to openstack namespace at the request of Ironic PTL, so there's no need to duplicate efforts. -zhenguo From: niuzhenguo...@hotmail.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 23:01:40 +0800 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic][Horizon][Tuskar-ui] Making a dashboard for Ironic Hi Devananda, The git history appears to be squashed [1], and most files don't have an attribution header [2], and none of the headers refer to the company who appears to be behind this (Huawei). What's the rationale for these inconsistencies, and who is actually behind the code? No headers refer to Huawei because the files are based on the Angular Dashboard from Horizon codes and now is only an empty baremetal dashboard which can be combined with Ironic-webclient created by Krotscheck. I think pushing the initial horizon compatible dashboard to stackforge or openstack is the first step for collaboration, then we can build a team for that. Are you going to maintain this project personally, or is there a team at Huawei (or somewhere else) that is going to do that? Or are you expecting Ironic's current developer teams to take ownership of this code and maintain it? There is not a team working for the project, the purpose I want to create ironic-dashboard is that I contribute to both Horizon and Ironic, and considering I can help to fill the gaps that there's no Horizon support for Ironic. About who should maintain the project, I'm not sure whether Horizon or Ironic or even a separate team. Are you/they going to become part of Ironic's community, attend our weekly meetings, and follow our design process? Sure, the dashboard should be geared towards Ironic. What is the vision / goal that is being working towards? What is the scope of this dashboard? How does it fit in with our existing plans? The end goal for ironic-dashboard is that it can be configured as a standalone UI or a dashboard within Horizon. Currently the codes on github is an empty dashboard, the panels and features should be developed with the ironic community. -zhenguo From: devananda@gmail.com Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 22:40:53 + To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic][Horizon][Tuskar-ui] Making a dashboard for Ironic Hi Jim, Your characterization of this is incomplete. These are not two equal projects proposing the same thing in different ways, and while I very much want to encourage collaboration, I value our community and feel that this was not done in the spirit of that community. To be clear: ironic-webclient has been developed with the knowledge and support of the Ironic developer community, and was not moved into the openstack/ namespace on my request, because I have been holding projects to a certain level of maturity before including them in Ironic, roughly equivalent to the TC's bar for big tent inclusion. On the other hand, ironic-dashboard was done without the knowledge of any Ironic cores, nor with even a heads up to the Ironic or Horizon PTLs. Rather than an open design process, this code was just dropped on github and Infra was asked to approve the project creation. I have not had the opportunity to talk with its author *at all* yet. I'm glad that ya'll didn't just approve the project creation request without checking with me, and I'm glad we are now having this discussion. Now that that is cleared up, let's move on. Hi Zhenguo, I have some questions about ironic-dashboard that I need answered before the Ironic Project Team accepts responsibility for it. The git history appears to be squashed [1], and most files don't have an attribution header [2], and none of the headers refer to the company who appears to be behind this (Huawei). What's the rationale for these inconsistencies, and who is actually behind the code? Are you going to maintain this project personally, or is there a team at Huawei (or somewhere else) that is going to do that? Or are you expecting Ironic's current developer teams to take ownership of this code and maintain it? Are you/they going to become part of Ironic's community, attend our weekly meetings, and follow our design process? What is the vision / goal that is being working towards? What is the scope of this dashboard? How does it fit in with our existing plans? I'm not entirely opposed to having two separate UI projects for Ironic at the moment, but we should be very clear about the rationale if we go that route. -Devananda [1] https://github.com/niuzhenguo/ironic-dashboard/commit/4be73d19e54eb75aa31da3d1a38fa65c1287bc7b[2] https://github.com/niuzhenguo/ironic-dashboard/search?q=copyright On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 12:00 PM James E. Blair cor...@inaugust.com wrote: Hi all, I'm glad
Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic][Horizon][Tuskar-ui] Making a dashboard for Ironic
Hi Devananda, The git history appears to be squashed [1], and most files don't have an attribution header [2], and none of the headers refer to the company who appears to be behind this (Huawei). What's the rationale for these inconsistencies, and who is actually behind the code? No headers refer to Huawei because the files are based on the Angular Dashboard from Horizon codes and now is only an empty baremetal dashboard which can be combined with Ironic-webclient created by Krotscheck. I think pushing the initial horizon compatible dashboard to stackforge or openstack is the first step for collaboration, then we can build a team for that. Are you going to maintain this project personally, or is there a team at Huawei (or somewhere else) that is going to do that? Or are you expecting Ironic's current developer teams to take ownership of this code and maintain it? There is not a team working for the project, the purpose I want to create ironic-dashboard is that I contribute to both Horizon and Ironic, and considering I can help to fill the gaps that there's no Horizon support for Ironic. About who should maintain the project, I'm not sure whether Horizon or Ironic or even a separate team. Are you/they going to become part of Ironic's community, attend our weekly meetings, and follow our design process? Sure, the dashboard should be geared towards Ironic. What is the vision / goal that is being working towards? What is the scope of this dashboard? How does it fit in with our existing plans? The end goal for ironic-dashboard is that it can be configured as a standalone UI or a dashboard within Horizon. Currently the codes on github is an empty dashboard, the panels and features should be developed with the ironic community. -zhenguo From: devananda@gmail.com Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 22:40:53 + To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic][Horizon][Tuskar-ui] Making a dashboard for Ironic Hi Jim, Your characterization of this is incomplete. These are not two equal projects proposing the same thing in different ways, and while I very much want to encourage collaboration, I value our community and feel that this was not done in the spirit of that community. To be clear: ironic-webclient has been developed with the knowledge and support of the Ironic developer community, and was not moved into the openstack/ namespace on my request, because I have been holding projects to a certain level of maturity before including them in Ironic, roughly equivalent to the TC's bar for big tent inclusion. On the other hand, ironic-dashboard was done without the knowledge of any Ironic cores, nor with even a heads up to the Ironic or Horizon PTLs. Rather than an open design process, this code was just dropped on github and Infra was asked to approve the project creation. I have not had the opportunity to talk with its author *at all* yet. I'm glad that ya'll didn't just approve the project creation request without checking with me, and I'm glad we are now having this discussion. Now that that is cleared up, let's move on. Hi Zhenguo, I have some questions about ironic-dashboard that I need answered before the Ironic Project Team accepts responsibility for it. The git history appears to be squashed [1], and most files don't have an attribution header [2], and none of the headers refer to the company who appears to be behind this (Huawei). What's the rationale for these inconsistencies, and who is actually behind the code? Are you going to maintain this project personally, or is there a team at Huawei (or somewhere else) that is going to do that? Or are you expecting Ironic's current developer teams to take ownership of this code and maintain it? Are you/they going to become part of Ironic's community, attend our weekly meetings, and follow our design process? What is the vision / goal that is being working towards? What is the scope of this dashboard? How does it fit in with our existing plans? I'm not entirely opposed to having two separate UI projects for Ironic at the moment, but we should be very clear about the rationale if we go that route. -Devananda [1] https://github.com/niuzhenguo/ironic-dashboard/commit/4be73d19e54eb75aa31da3d1a38fa65c1287bc7b[2] https://github.com/niuzhenguo/ironic-dashboard/search?q=copyright On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 12:00 PM James E. Blair cor...@inaugust.com wrote: Hi all, I'm glad that by asking the ironic-dashboard creators to propose their project to ironic initially (rather than stackforge) we have prompted this conversation. We now know that two independent groups of people have created standalone ironic dashboards, neither of which is currently part of an OpenStack project. We have an opportunity for those teams to begin collaborating now. I would encourage them to do so, along with both the Ironic and Horizon teams, on a path forward. Let's end
Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic][Horizon][Tuskar-ui] Making a dashboard for Ironic
Hi Thai Q Tran, Thanks for the links about the Angular Dashboard, I agree with starting with the new angular horizon, will begin to draft a init repo of the new ironic-dashboard. And maybe can work with Krotscheck together. And as Andreas Jaeger comments here [1], he suggested to push ironic-dashboard in the openstack namespace instead of stackforge, and have a separate core team, needs Ironicers chime in here. [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/191131/ Regards -zhenguo From: Thai Q Tran [mailto:tqt...@us.ibm.com] Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 6:36 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic][Horizon][Tuskar-ui] Making a dashboard for Ironic Hi Zhengou, I think it make sense to start with the angular version. It's true that we don't have an angular dashboard yet, but we have a pretty good idea of what needs to go into it. I'll link a few patches that will give you an idea of where we are headed. I think this will also save you some work in the long run. For creating a new dashboard: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/190852/ For creating a new panel: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/190865/ For demo patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/181253/ The file and code structure I would say is pretty stable. There are still some infra stuff that needs to happen to make this easier to do. Things like translation in static HTML, auto discovery of static files, start dash for angular, etc... -niuzhenguo niuzhen...@huawei.commailto:niuzhen...@huawei.com wrote: - To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org From: niuzhenguo niuzhen...@huawei.commailto:niuzhen...@huawei.com Date: 06/17/2015 06:38PM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic][Horizon][Tuskar-ui] Making a dashboard for Ironic Hi Krotscheck, Sorry for not attending the last meeting due to TZ. Yes, Horizon is moving towards an Angular application, but for now there’s no any Angular Dashboard landed. I think it’s high time that we should make a standard for other projects which want to horizon compatible on whether they should based on Angular Dashboard or the current Horizon framework. This is important for the new Magnum and Ironic UI, personally, I’d prefer to use the current framework and move to Angular Dashboard when it’s mature. And after a quick look at your JS project, I think it’s totally a standalone UI not based on Horizon Angular Dashboard (correct me if I missed something), and seems there’s no any update over a month, are you planning to push you repo to stackforge or openstack? Anyway, it’s clear that we should make an Ironic dashboard, it’s a good start. Regards -zhenguo From: Michael Krotscheck [mailto:krotsch...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2015 11:56 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic][Horizon][Tuskar-ui] Making a dashboard for Ironic Hey there! Yes, we are duplicating effort. I've spent quite a bit of effort over the past few months landing features inside openstack that will make it possible for a JavaScript client to be imported to horizon as a dependency. This includes CORS, configuration, caching, infra tooling, etc, with the end goal being a maximum amount of code reusability between the standalone UI and Horizon. While it may not appear that way, I _am_ actively working on this project, though I'm currently focused on javascript infrastructure tooling and oslo middleware than the ironic webclient itself. With Horizon also moving towards an angular application, I feel it makes far more sense to build components for the new Horizon than the old one. Michael On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:02 PM NiuZhenguo niuzhenguo...@hotmail.commailto:niuzhenguo...@hotmail.com wrote: hi folks, I'm planning to propose a new horizon plugin ironic-dashboard to fill the gap that ironic doesn't have horizon support. I know there's a nodes panel on infrastructure dashboard handled by tuskar-ui, but it's specifically geared towards TripleO. Ironic needs a separate dashboard to present an interface for querying and managing ironic's resources (Drivers, Nodes, and Ports). After discussion with the ironic community, I pushed an ironic-dashboard project to stackforge [1]. Also there's an existing JS UI for ironic in developing now [2], we may try to resolve the same goals, but as an integrated openstack project, there's clear needs to have horizon support. I'd like to get what's your suggestion, thanks in advance. [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/191131/ [2] https://github.com/krotscheck/ironic-webclient Regards -zhenguo __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribehttp://openstack-dev-requ
Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic][Horizon][Tuskar-ui] Making a dashboard for Ironic
Hi Krotscheck, Sorry for not attending the last meeting due to TZ. Yes, Horizon is moving towards an Angular application, but for now there’s no any Angular Dashboard landed. I think it’s high time that we should make a standard for other projects which want to horizon compatible on whether they should based on Angular Dashboard or the current Horizon framework. This is important for the new Magnum and Ironic UI, personally, I’d prefer to use the current framework and move to Angular Dashboard when it’s mature. And after a quick look at your JS project, I think it’s totally a standalone UI not based on Horizon Angular Dashboard (correct me if I missed something), and seems there’s no any update over a month, are you planning to push you repo to stackforge or openstack? Anyway, it’s clear that we should make an Ironic dashboard, it’s a good start. Regards -zhenguo From: Michael Krotscheck [mailto:krotsch...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2015 11:56 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic][Horizon][Tuskar-ui] Making a dashboard for Ironic Hey there! Yes, we are duplicating effort. I've spent quite a bit of effort over the past few months landing features inside openstack that will make it possible for a JavaScript client to be imported to horizon as a dependency. This includes CORS, configuration, caching, infra tooling, etc, with the end goal being a maximum amount of code reusability between the standalone UI and Horizon. While it may not appear that way, I _am_ actively working on this project, though I'm currently focused on javascript infrastructure tooling and oslo middleware than the ironic webclient itself. With Horizon also moving towards an angular application, I feel it makes far more sense to build components for the new Horizon than the old one. Michael On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:02 PM NiuZhenguo niuzhenguo...@hotmail.commailto:niuzhenguo...@hotmail.com wrote: hi folks, I'm planning to propose a new horizon plugin ironic-dashboard to fill the gap that ironic doesn't have horizon support. I know there's a nodes panel on infrastructure dashboard handled by tuskar-ui, but it's specifically geared towards TripleO. Ironic needs a separate dashboard to present an interface for querying and managing ironic's resources (Drivers, Nodes, and Ports). After discussion with the ironic community, I pushed an ironic-dashboard project to stackforge [1]. Also there's an existing JS UI for ironic in developing now [2], we may try to resolve the same goals, but as an integrated openstack project, there's clear needs to have horizon support. I'd like to get what's your suggestion, thanks in advance. [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/191131/ [2] https://github.com/krotscheck/ironic-webclient Regards -zhenguo __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribehttp://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [Ironic][Horizon][Tuskar-ui] Making a dashboard for Ironic
hi folks,I'm planning to propose a new horizon plugin ironic-dashboard to fill the gap that ironic doesn't have horizon support. I know there's a nodes panel on infrastructure dashboard handled by tuskar-ui, but it's specifically geared towards TripleO. Ironic needs a separate dashboard to present an interface for querying and managing ironic's resources (Drivers, Nodes, and Ports).After discussion with the ironic community, I pushed an ironic-dashboard project to stackforge [1].Also there's an existing JS UI for ironic in developing now [2], we may try to resolve the same goals, but as an integrated openstack project, there's clear needs to have horizon support.I'd like to get what's your suggestion, thanks in advance.[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/191131/[2] https://github.com/krotscheck/ironic-webclient Regards-zhenguo __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum][horizon] Making a dashboard for Magnum - need a vote from the core team
Same here, I’m interested in helping out with reviews from Horizon standpoint. Regards Zhenguo Niu From: David Lyle [mailto:dkly...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 05, 2015 3:42 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum][horizon] Making a dashboard for Magnum - need a vote from the core team I'm happy to provide reviews from the Horizon standpoint. David On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Jason Rist jr...@redhat.commailto:jr...@redhat.com wrote: On 06/04/2015 11:58 AM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: Hey folks, I think it is critical for self-service needs that we have a Horizon dashboard to represent Magnum. I know the entire Magnum team has no experience in UI development, but I have found atleast one volunteer Bradley Jones to tackle the work. I am looking for more volunteers to tackle this high impact effort to bring Containers to OpenStack either in the existing Magnum core team or as new contributors. If your interested, please chime in on this thread. As far as “how to get patches approved”, there are two models we can go with. Option #1: We add these UI folks to the magnum-core team and trust them not to +2/+A Magnum infrastructure code. This also preserves us as one team with one mission. Option #2: We make a new core team magnum-ui-core. This presents special problems if the UI contributor team isn’t large enough to get reviews in. I suspect Option #2 will be difficult to execute. Cores, please vote on Option #1, or Option #2, and Adrian can make a decision based upon the results. Regards -steve __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribehttp://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev I am interested in helping as well. In my experience, #1 works best, but I'm not a core, so I'm not sure my wisdom is counted here. -J -- Jason E. Rist Senior Software Engineer OpenStack Infrastructure Integration Red Hat, Inc. openuc: +1.972.707.6408tel:%2B1.972.707.6408 mobile: +1.720.256.3933tel:%2B1.720.256.3933 Freenode: jrist github/identi.cahttp://identi.ca: knowncitizen __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribehttp://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] Core Reviewer Update
Welcome! 发件人: David Lyle [mailto:dkly...@gmail.com] 发送时间: 2015年4月29日 6:58 收件人: OpenStack Development Mailing List 主题: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] Core Reviewer Update I am pleased to announce the addition of Doug Fish, Rob Cresswell and Travis Tripp to the Horizon Core Reviewer team. Doug Fish has been an active reviewer and participant in Horizon for a few releases now. He represents a strong customer focus and has provided high quality reviews. Rob Cresswell has been providing a high number of quality reviews, an active contributor and an active participant in the community. Travis Tripp has been contributing to Horizon for the past couple of releases, an active participant in the community, a critical angularJS reviewer, and played a significant role in driving the angular based launch instance work in Kilo. Thank you all for your contributions and welcome to the team! David __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
