Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev][DevStack][Neutron] facing problem in devstack install - No Network found for private

[nidhi.hada]

Hi Andreas,


As in between you suggested to try with default devstack

neutron config params. I tried that i set no config option

for neutron part all default.


This local.conf is working well..


for others who are facing problem pasting working local.conf here

http://paste.openstack.org/show/595339/


Attaching too.


Thanks

Nidhi






From: Nidhi Mittal Hada (Product Engineering Service)
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 2:44 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev][DevStack][Neutron] facing problem 
in devstack install - No Network found for private


Andreas,


I require nothing specific from neutron side.

Just a basic working setup from neutron side

because my work is mostly on storage side of

OpenStack.


Can you please suggest a working configuration

if  tried recently.


Thanks

nidhi



From: Nidhi Mittal Hada (Product Engineering Service)
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 2:35:13 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev][DevStack][Neutron] facing problem 
in devstack install - No Network found for private


HI Andreas,


Thanks for your reply.


I have no specific reason for using this network configuration in local.conf.

I have only basic knowledge of these config options even.

This local.conf network configurations used to work well with earlier

devstack openstack versions. So i did not change it..

Just this time its creating trouble.


I have not created any ovs bridge manually  before running devstack.

just created this local.conf and ran ./stack.sh in devstack folder.


Can you please suggest changes if i have not created ovs-bridge manually.


At present my settings are - from local.conf - for reference -

FIXED_RANGE=10.11.12.0/24
NETWORK_GATEWAY=10.11.12.1
FIXED_NETWORK_SIZE=256

FLOATING_RANGE=10.0.2.0/24
Q_FLOATING_ALLOCATION_POOL=start=10.0.2.104,end=10.0.2.111
PUBLIC_NETWORK_GATEWAY=10.0.2.1
HOST_IP=10.0.2.15

PUBLIC_INTERFACE=eth0


Q_USE_SECGROUP=True
ENABLE_TENANT_VLANS=True
TENANT_VLAN_RANGE=1000:1999
PHYSICAL_NETWORK=default
OVS_PHYSICAL_BRIDGE=br-ex


Q_USE_PROVIDER_NETWORKING=True
Q_L3_ENABLED=False

PROVIDER_SUBNET_NAME="provider_net"
PROVIDER_NETWORK_TYPE="vlan"
SEGMENTATION_ID=2010






Thanks

Nidhi




From: Andreas Scheuring 
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 1:09:17 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev][DevStack][Neutron] facing problem 
in devstack install - No Network found for private

** This mail has been sent from an external source **

Without looking into the details

you're specifying
Q_USE_PROVIDER_NETWORKING=True
in your local.conf - usually this results in the creation of a single
provider network called "public". But the manila devstack plugin seems
not to be able to deal with provider networks as it's expecting a
network named "private" to be present.


Why are you using provider networks? Just for sake of VLANs? You can
also configure devstack to use vlans with the default setup. This has
worked for me in the past - results in a private network using vlans
(assuming you have created ovs b bridge br-data manually):


OVS_PHYSICAL_BRIDGE=br-data
PHYSICAL_NETWORK=phys-data

ENABLE_TENANT_TUNNELS=False
Q_ML2_TENANT_NETWORK_TYPE=vlan
ENABLE_TENANT_VLANS=True
TENANT_VLAN_RANGE=1000:1000




--
-
Andreas
IRC: andreas_s



On Mi, 2017-01-18 at 06:59 +, nidhi.h...@wipro.com wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
> I was trying to install latest Newton version of OpenStack using
> devstack on my laptop, all in one machine,
>
> using Virtualbox VM. Lately i have been facing same problem in last
> few tries and installation doesn't get successful.
>
>
> My VM network adapter configuration is as below.
>
>
> Adapter1
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> and 2nd adapter is as
>
> Adapter2
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thats detail of Host Only Networking
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thats my local.conf for devstack
>
>
>
> http://paste.openstack.org/show/595313/
>
>
>
>
> excerpt is
>
> FIXED_RANGE=10.11.12.0/24
>
>
> NETWORK_GATEWAY=10.11.12.1
> FIXED_NETWORK_SIZE=256
>
>
> FLOATING_RANGE=10.0.2.0/24
> Q_FLOATING_ALLOCATION_POOL=start=10.0.2.104,end=10.0.2.111
> PUBLIC_NETWORK_GATEWAY=10.0.2.1
> HOST_IP=10.0.2.15
>
>
> PUBLIC_INTERFACE=eth0
>
>
>
> Thats ubuntu version on VM
> stack@ubuntu:~/devstack$ lsb_release -d
> Description: Ubuntu 14.04.5 LTS
> stack@ubuntu:~/devstack$
>
>
> Thats my machine's network interfaces file
>
>
> stack@ubuntu:~/devstack$ cat /etc/network/interfaces
>
>
> # This file describes the network interfaces available on your system
> # and how to activate them. For more information, see interfaces(5).
>
>
> # The loopback network interface
> auto lo
> iface lo inet loopback
>
>
> # The primary network interface
> auto eth1
> iface eth1 inet static
> address 192.168.56.150
> netmask 255.255.255.0
>
>
> auto 

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev][DevStack][Neutron] facing problem in devstack install - No Network found for private

[nidhi.hada]

Andreas,


I require nothing specific from neutron side.

Just a basic working setup from neutron side

because my work is mostly on storage side of

OpenStack.


Can you please suggest a working configuration

if  tried recently.


Thanks

nidhi



From: Nidhi Mittal Hada (Product Engineering Service)
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 2:35:13 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev][DevStack][Neutron] facing problem 
in devstack install - No Network found for private


HI Andreas,


Thanks for your reply.


I have no specific reason for using this network configuration in local.conf.

I have only basic knowledge of these config options even.

This local.conf network configurations used to work well with earlier

devstack openstack versions. So i did not change it..

Just this time its creating trouble.


I have not created any ovs bridge manually  before running devstack.

just created this local.conf and ran ./stack.sh in devstack folder.


Can you please suggest changes if i have not created ovs-bridge manually.


At present my settings are - from local.conf - for reference -

FIXED_RANGE=10.11.12.0/24
NETWORK_GATEWAY=10.11.12.1
FIXED_NETWORK_SIZE=256

FLOATING_RANGE=10.0.2.0/24
Q_FLOATING_ALLOCATION_POOL=start=10.0.2.104,end=10.0.2.111
PUBLIC_NETWORK_GATEWAY=10.0.2.1
HOST_IP=10.0.2.15

PUBLIC_INTERFACE=eth0


Q_USE_SECGROUP=True
ENABLE_TENANT_VLANS=True
TENANT_VLAN_RANGE=1000:1999
PHYSICAL_NETWORK=default
OVS_PHYSICAL_BRIDGE=br-ex


Q_USE_PROVIDER_NETWORKING=True
Q_L3_ENABLED=False

PROVIDER_SUBNET_NAME="provider_net"
PROVIDER_NETWORK_TYPE="vlan"
SEGMENTATION_ID=2010






Thanks

Nidhi




From: Andreas Scheuring 
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 1:09:17 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev][DevStack][Neutron] facing problem 
in devstack install - No Network found for private

** This mail has been sent from an external source **

Without looking into the details

you're specifying
Q_USE_PROVIDER_NETWORKING=True
in your local.conf - usually this results in the creation of a single
provider network called "public". But the manila devstack plugin seems
not to be able to deal with provider networks as it's expecting a
network named "private" to be present.


Why are you using provider networks? Just for sake of VLANs? You can
also configure devstack to use vlans with the default setup. This has
worked for me in the past - results in a private network using vlans
(assuming you have created ovs b bridge br-data manually):


OVS_PHYSICAL_BRIDGE=br-data
PHYSICAL_NETWORK=phys-data

ENABLE_TENANT_TUNNELS=False
Q_ML2_TENANT_NETWORK_TYPE=vlan
ENABLE_TENANT_VLANS=True
TENANT_VLAN_RANGE=1000:1000




--
-
Andreas
IRC: andreas_s



On Mi, 2017-01-18 at 06:59 +, nidhi.h...@wipro.com wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
> I was trying to install latest Newton version of OpenStack using
> devstack on my laptop, all in one machine,
>
> using Virtualbox VM. Lately i have been facing same problem in last
> few tries and installation doesn't get successful.
>
>
> My VM network adapter configuration is as below.
>
>
> Adapter1
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> and 2nd adapter is as
>
> Adapter2
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thats detail of Host Only Networking
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thats my local.conf for devstack
>
>
>
> http://paste.openstack.org/show/595313/
>
>
>
>
> excerpt is
>
> FIXED_RANGE=10.11.12.0/24
>
>
> NETWORK_GATEWAY=10.11.12.1
> FIXED_NETWORK_SIZE=256
>
>
> FLOATING_RANGE=10.0.2.0/24
> Q_FLOATING_ALLOCATION_POOL=start=10.0.2.104,end=10.0.2.111
> PUBLIC_NETWORK_GATEWAY=10.0.2.1
> HOST_IP=10.0.2.15
>
>
> PUBLIC_INTERFACE=eth0
>
>
>
> Thats ubuntu version on VM
> stack@ubuntu:~/devstack$ lsb_release -d
> Description: Ubuntu 14.04.5 LTS
> stack@ubuntu:~/devstack$
>
>
> Thats my machine's network interfaces file
>
>
> stack@ubuntu:~/devstack$ cat /etc/network/interfaces
>
>
> # This file describes the network interfaces available on your system
> # and how to activate them. For more information, see interfaces(5).
>
>
> # The loopback network interface
> auto lo
> iface lo inet loopback
>
>
> # The primary network interface
> auto eth1
> iface eth1 inet static
> address 192.168.56.150
> netmask 255.255.255.0
>
>
> auto eth0
> iface eth0 inet dhcp
> stack@ubuntu:~/devstack$
>
>
>
> Error I am facing is
>
>
> http://paste.openstack.org/show/595315/
>
>
>
> Excerpt is
>
>
> 2017-01-18 06:29:55.396 |
> +++ /opt/stack/manila/devstack/plugin.sh:create_service_share_servers:287 :   
> openstack network show private -f value -c id
> 2017-01-18 06:29:56.778 | ResourceNotFound: No Network found for
> private
> 2017-01-18 06:29:56.805 |
> ++ /opt/stack/manila/devstack/plugin.sh:create_service_share_servers:287 :   
> private_net_id=
> 2017-01-18 06:29:56.807 |
> + /opt/stack/manila/devstack/plugin.sh:create_service_share_servers:1 :   
> exit_trap
> 2017-01-18 

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev][DevStack][Neutron] facing problem in devstack install - No Network found for private

[nidhi.hada]

HI Andreas,


Thanks for your reply.


I have no specific reason for using this network configuration in local.conf.

I have only basic knowledge of these config options even.

This local.conf network configurations used to work well with earlier

devstack openstack versions. So i did not change it..

Just this time its creating trouble.


I have not created any ovs bridge manually  before running devstack.

just created this local.conf and ran ./stack.sh in devstack folder.


Can you please suggest changes if i have not created ovs-bridge manually.


At present my settings are - from local.conf - for reference -

FIXED_RANGE=10.11.12.0/24
NETWORK_GATEWAY=10.11.12.1
FIXED_NETWORK_SIZE=256

FLOATING_RANGE=10.0.2.0/24
Q_FLOATING_ALLOCATION_POOL=start=10.0.2.104,end=10.0.2.111
PUBLIC_NETWORK_GATEWAY=10.0.2.1
HOST_IP=10.0.2.15

PUBLIC_INTERFACE=eth0


Q_USE_SECGROUP=True
ENABLE_TENANT_VLANS=True
TENANT_VLAN_RANGE=1000:1999
PHYSICAL_NETWORK=default
OVS_PHYSICAL_BRIDGE=br-ex


Q_USE_PROVIDER_NETWORKING=True
Q_L3_ENABLED=False

PROVIDER_SUBNET_NAME="provider_net"
PROVIDER_NETWORK_TYPE="vlan"
SEGMENTATION_ID=2010






Thanks

Nidhi




From: Andreas Scheuring 
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 1:09:17 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev][DevStack][Neutron] facing problem 
in devstack install - No Network found for private

** This mail has been sent from an external source **

Without looking into the details

you're specifying
Q_USE_PROVIDER_NETWORKING=True
in your local.conf - usually this results in the creation of a single
provider network called "public". But the manila devstack plugin seems
not to be able to deal with provider networks as it's expecting a
network named "private" to be present.


Why are you using provider networks? Just for sake of VLANs? You can
also configure devstack to use vlans with the default setup. This has
worked for me in the past - results in a private network using vlans
(assuming you have created ovs b bridge br-data manually):


OVS_PHYSICAL_BRIDGE=br-data
PHYSICAL_NETWORK=phys-data

ENABLE_TENANT_TUNNELS=False
Q_ML2_TENANT_NETWORK_TYPE=vlan
ENABLE_TENANT_VLANS=True
TENANT_VLAN_RANGE=1000:1000




--
-
Andreas
IRC: andreas_s



On Mi, 2017-01-18 at 06:59 +, nidhi.h...@wipro.com wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
> I was trying to install latest Newton version of OpenStack using
> devstack on my laptop, all in one machine,
>
> using Virtualbox VM. Lately i have been facing same problem in last
> few tries and installation doesn't get successful.
>
>
> My VM network adapter configuration is as below.
>
>
> Adapter1
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> and 2nd adapter is as
>
> Adapter2
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thats detail of Host Only Networking
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thats my local.conf for devstack
>
>
>
> http://paste.openstack.org/show/595313/
>
>
>
>
> excerpt is
>
> FIXED_RANGE=10.11.12.0/24
>
>
> NETWORK_GATEWAY=10.11.12.1
> FIXED_NETWORK_SIZE=256
>
>
> FLOATING_RANGE=10.0.2.0/24
> Q_FLOATING_ALLOCATION_POOL=start=10.0.2.104,end=10.0.2.111
> PUBLIC_NETWORK_GATEWAY=10.0.2.1
> HOST_IP=10.0.2.15
>
>
> PUBLIC_INTERFACE=eth0
>
>
>
> Thats ubuntu version on VM
> stack@ubuntu:~/devstack$ lsb_release -d
> Description: Ubuntu 14.04.5 LTS
> stack@ubuntu:~/devstack$
>
>
> Thats my machine's network interfaces file
>
>
> stack@ubuntu:~/devstack$ cat /etc/network/interfaces
>
>
> # This file describes the network interfaces available on your system
> # and how to activate them. For more information, see interfaces(5).
>
>
> # The loopback network interface
> auto lo
> iface lo inet loopback
>
>
> # The primary network interface
> auto eth1
> iface eth1 inet static
> address 192.168.56.150
> netmask 255.255.255.0
>
>
> auto eth0
> iface eth0 inet dhcp
> stack@ubuntu:~/devstack$
>
>
>
> Error I am facing is
>
>
> http://paste.openstack.org/show/595315/
>
>
>
> Excerpt is
>
>
> 2017-01-18 06:29:55.396 |
> +++ /opt/stack/manila/devstack/plugin.sh:create_service_share_servers:287 :   
> openstack network show private -f value -c id
> 2017-01-18 06:29:56.778 | ResourceNotFound: No Network found for
> private
> 2017-01-18 06:29:56.805 |
> ++ /opt/stack/manila/devstack/plugin.sh:create_service_share_servers:287 :   
> private_net_id=
> 2017-01-18 06:29:56.807 |
> + /opt/stack/manila/devstack/plugin.sh:create_service_share_servers:1 :   
> exit_trap
> 2017-01-18 06:29:56.809 | + ./stack.sh:exit_trap:487 :
> local r=1
> 2017-01-18 06:29:56.815 | ++ ./stack.sh:exit_trap:488
>   :   jobs -p
> 2017-01-18 06:29:56.817 | + ./stack.sh:exit_trap:488 :
> jobs=
> 2017-01-18 06:29:56.819 | + ./stack.sh:exit_trap:491 :
> [[ -n '' ]]
> 2017-01-18 06:29:56.821 | + ./stack.sh:exit_trap:497 :
> kill_spinner
> 2017-01-18 06:29:56.823 | + ./stack.sh:kill_spinner:383  :
> '[' '!' -z '' ']'
> 2017-01-18 06:29:56.824 | + ./stack.sh:exit_trap:499

Re: [openstack-dev] [manila] propose adding gouthamr to manila core

[nidhi.hada]

Wow!! Great idea.


From: Thomas Bechtold 
Sent: Thursday, November 3, 2016 11:16:41 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [manila] propose adding gouthamr to manila core

** This mail has been sent from an external source **

Great idea! +1!

Tom
On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 08:09:27AM -0400, Tom Barron wrote:
> I hereby propose that we add Goutham Pacha Ravi (gouthamr on IRC) to the
> manila core team.  This is a clear case where he's already been doing
> the review work, excelling both qualitatively and quantitatively, as
> well as being a valuable committer to the project.  Goutham deserves to
> be core and we need the additional bandwidth for the project.  He's
> treated as a de facto core by the community already.  Let's make it
> official!
>
> -- Tom Barron
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to 
this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may 
contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. 
Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and 
any attachments. WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The 
recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of 
viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus 
transmitted by this email. www.wipro.com
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-dev][Fuel][Plugin]

[nidhi.hada]

Hi All,


This is regarding an info required for fuel plugin development.

We are working on Fuel Cinder Plugin where we require to

configure multiple 'n' number of backends of storage vendor ,

in one go, from Fuel UI screen. where 'n' will be known at run time.


Its like from UI, I can configure a set of fields, [field1, field2, field3]

for one backend and if user ask to configure 'n' backends then same

set of fields to be asked repeatedly.


I have found some similar provision was planned in

https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/dynamic-fields


But when i see implementation 
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/dynamic-fields,n,z

which implements new type as text_list and textarea_list ..

which is capability to add multiple lines of text in single field..


It does not look like same as aim of BP, where acceptance criteria for BP is

"Enable text and textarea field types to be extended - where a plugin user is 
able to toggle the visibility of additional fields with +/- signs and the data 
provided is used by plugin"


Kindly correct my understanding if its wrong, do we have capability to add a 
text field by pressing +/- ?

What capability do we have with Fuel UI to add fields dynamically today ?


I have read 
https://openstack.nimeyo.com/44264/openstack-dev-fuel-interaction-between-fuel-plugin-and-fuel

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] interaction between fuel-plugin and fuel-UI - OpenStack 
Mailing List 
Archive
openstack.nimeyo.com
Hi all, I am working on two plugins for fuel : logrotate and cinder-netapp (to 
add ... /lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



where suggestions are made to use restrictions to hide display components.


Another suggestion is to use comma separated values.


But its an year back post, do we have a better solution today ?


Will be helpful if someone can suggest how do we achieve it in fuel UI.



Thanks

Nidhi







The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to 
this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may 
contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. 
Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and 
any attachments. WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The 
recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of 
viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus 
transmitted by this email. www.wipro.com
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev][Manila] BP https://blueprints.launchpad.net/manila/+spec/access-group

[nidhi.hada]

Hi Everyone,

https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Manila/design/access_groups

Created a wiki page to describe different approaches, their comparison,
to achieve the goal.

It would be helpful to receive your comments, based on your experiences,
which approach suits real life needs better.

Thanks
Nidhi


From: Nidhi Mittal Hada (Product Engineering Service)
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2016 6:14 PM
To: 'OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)' 

Cc: 'bswa...@netapp.com' ; 'Ben Swartzlander' 

Subject: RE: [OpenStack-Dev][Manila] BP 
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/manila/+spec/access-group

Hi All,

A gentle reminder..

Could you please share your thoughts on the approach proposed here ..

https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/access_group_nidhimittalhada

Thanks
Nidhi











From: Nidhi Mittal Hada (Product Engineering Service)
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2016 2:22 PM
To: 'OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)' 
>
Cc: 'bswa...@netapp.com' >; 'Ben 
Swartzlander' >
Subject: RE: [OpenStack-Dev][Manila] BP 
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/manila/+spec/access-groups

Hi All,

This is just a gentle reminder to the previous mail ..

PFA is revised doc.

Same is pasted here also.
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/access_group_nidhimittalhada

Kindly share your thoughts on this..

Thanks
Nidhi



From: Nidhi Mittal Hada (Product Engineering Service)
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 3:22 PM
To: 'OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)' 
>
Cc: 'bswa...@netapp.com' >; 'Ben 
Swartzlander' >
Subject: [OpenStack-Dev][Manila] BP 
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/manila/+spec/access-groups

Hi Manila Team,

I am working on
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/manila/+spec/access-groups

For this I have created initial document as attached with the mail.
It contains DB CLI REST API related changes.

Could you please have a look and share your opinion.

Kindly let me know, if there is some understanding gap,
or something I have missed to document or
share your comments in general to make it better.

Thank you.
Nidhi Mittal Hada
Architect | PES / COE - Kolkata India
Wipro Limited
M +91 74 3910 9883 | O +91 33 3095 4767 | VOIP +91 33 3095 4767



The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to 
this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may 
contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. 
Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and 
any attachments. WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The 
recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of 
viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus 
transmitted by this email. www.wipro.com
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev][Manila] BP https://blueprints.launchpad.net/manila/+spec/access-group

[nidhi.hada]

Hi All,

A gentle reminder..

Could you please share your thoughts on the approach proposed here ..

https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/access_group_nidhimittalhada

Thanks
Nidhi











From: Nidhi Mittal Hada (Product Engineering Service)
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2016 2:22 PM
To: 'OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)' 

Cc: 'bswa...@netapp.com' ; 'Ben Swartzlander' 

Subject: RE: [OpenStack-Dev][Manila] BP 
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/manila/+spec/access-groups

Hi All,

This is just a gentle reminder to the previous mail ..

PFA is revised doc.

Same is pasted here also.
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/access_group_nidhimittalhada

Kindly share your thoughts on this..

Thanks
Nidhi



From: Nidhi Mittal Hada (Product Engineering Service)
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 3:22 PM
To: 'OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)' 
>
Cc: 'bswa...@netapp.com' >; 'Ben 
Swartzlander' >
Subject: [OpenStack-Dev][Manila] BP 
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/manila/+spec/access-groups

Hi Manila Team,

I am working on
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/manila/+spec/access-groups

For this I have created initial document as attached with the mail.
It contains DB CLI REST API related changes.

Could you please have a look and share your opinion.

Kindly let me know, if there is some understanding gap,
or something I have missed to document or
share your comments in general to make it better.

Thank you.
Nidhi Mittal Hada
Architect | PES / COE - Kolkata India
Wipro Limited
M +91 74 3910 9883 | O +91 33 3095 4767 | VOIP +91 33 3095 4767



The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to 
this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may 
contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. 
Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and 
any attachments. WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The 
recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of 
viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus 
transmitted by this email. www.wipro.com
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev][All][Manila] Api development question - nested urls - which approach is better?

[nidhi.hada]

Hi All,

This is a general doubt related to taking a decision on REST API url 
construction.

In case of “nested urls”, lets say I have a relationship between
two entities as below:
access_group is parent can have many access_group_entries.

Now for accessing access_group I have already created


· Create access group - POST /access_groups

· Show access_group – GET /access_groups/

· List access_group – GET /access_groups/

· Delete access_group – PUT /access_groups/

That’s fine till here.

Now when I work on child entity that is access_group_entry, I
face a problem.


Here, i have two options for url construction for access_group_entries.

Option1 :-
Considering that access_group_entry is related to access_group, it
should be designed as a suburl, I go as below:


· Create access-group-entry -- POST '/access_groups/%s/entries'   i 
send “access_group_id” in which entry is to be created, as part of url, okay. 
no issue. it works.

· Show access-group-entry  -- GET  '/access_groups/%s/entries/%s'  
need two variables from user, access_group_id and access_group_entry_id -
But I do not have access_group_id!!
as when, i say show access_group_entry  - i 
have just uuid of access_group_entry_directly.
That's a problem. is it ? what to do in such case?


· List access-group-entry  -- GET '/access_groups/%s/entries'>>> Here 
also its not mandatory that user will always give access_group_id.

He might ask access_group_entry list for all access_groups in a go..

hence same problem.

Option2 :-
==
Not creating a suburl, instead creating an independent url

RESOURCES_PATH = '/access_groups_entries'
RESOURCE_PATH = '/access_groups_entries/%s'

1)Create POST '/access_groups_entries'  >> Passing access_group_id in body
2)Show   GET  '/access_groups_entries/%s'  directly access_group_entry_id 
here to be shown

3)List   GET '/access_groups/%s/entries' directly access_group_entry_id 
here to be shown.
If access_group_id is given for filtering, will go as part of body.

It solves above problem but it creates a new url for a resource
which is child of a earlier created url.
Is that a problem?

Kindly suggest


Thanks.
Nidhi








From: Nidhi Mittal Hada (Product Engineering Service)
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2016 10:32 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 

Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev][All] Api development question

Thank you Valeriy.


From: Valeriy Ponomaryov [mailto:vponomar...@mirantis.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2016 7:05 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 
>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev][All] Api development question

"Not found" means API you request is not registered. AFAICS, you register 
"access_groups", but request "access-groups". Diff in symbols "_" and "-".

On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 1:34 PM, 
> wrote:


Hi all,

I am working on a feature for share access in manila.
For that lets say for creating the entity, I created client and server
counterpart.

I am stuck as my client request is not able to reach server resource
I have created for it. This is client server log
http://paste.openstack.org/show/489642/


manila/api/v2/router.py
This is my router entry

from manila.api.v2 import access_groups
.
.

self.resources["access_groups"] = access_groups.create_resource()
mapper.resource("access_group", "access_groups",
controller=self.resources["access_groups"],
collection={"detail": "GET"},
member={"defaults": "GET"})


I don’t understand what mistake I have made that the request
Is not getting mapped to correct resource.

stack@controller:/opt/stack/manila/manila/api/v2$ ls access_groups.py
access_groups.py
stack@controller:/opt/stack/manila/manila/api/v2$

This is access_groups.py snippet
http://paste.openstack.org/show/489667/

Can someone please help in pointing, what can be probable reason of this ?
I have checked the flow from client to server, not able to catch the mistake..



Regards

Nidhi Mittal Hada
Architect | PES / COE – Kolkata India
Wipro Limited
M +91 74 3910 9883 | O +91 33 3095 
4767 | VOIP +91 33 3095 
4767



The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to 
this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may 
contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. 
Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and 
any attachments. WARNING: Computer 

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev][All] Api development question

[nidhi.hada]

Hi all,

I am working on a feature for share access in manila.
For that lets say for creating the entity, I created client and server
counterpart.

I am stuck as my client request is not able to reach server resource
I have created for it. This is client server log
http://paste.openstack.org/show/489642/


manila/api/v2/router.py
This is my router entry

from manila.api.v2 import access_groups
.
.

self.resources["access_groups"] = access_groups.create_resource()
mapper.resource("access_group", "access_groups",
controller=self.resources["access_groups"],
collection={"detail": "GET"},
member={"defaults": "GET"})


I don't understand what mistake I have made that the request
Is not getting mapped to correct resource.

stack@controller:/opt/stack/manila/manila/api/v2$ ls access_groups.py
access_groups.py
stack@controller:/opt/stack/manila/manila/api/v2$

This is access_groups.py snippet
http://paste.openstack.org/show/489667/

Can someone please help in pointing, what can be probable reason of this ?
I have checked the flow from client to server, not able to catch the mistake..



Regards

Nidhi Mittal Hada
Architect | PES / COE - Kolkata India
Wipro Limited
M +91 74 3910 9883 | O +91 33 3095 4767 | VOIP +91 33 3095 4767



The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to 
this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may 
contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. 
Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and 
any attachments. WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The 
recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of 
viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus 
transmitted by this email. www.wipro.com
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-dev][Manila] status=NONE when share is created

[nidhi.hada]

Hi All,

Could you please reply to below mail...

Thanks
Nidhi

From: Nidhi Mittal Hada (WT01 - Product Engineering Service)
Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2016 12:42 PM
To: 'OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)' 

Subject: RE: [Openstack-dev][Manila] status=NONE when share is created

Hi All,

Could someone please reply to the mail below ..

Is this an expected state to get created share status as None?

As we are intentionally not creating "share instance" while creating
share..

For details please see mail below..

Thanks
Nidhi


From: Nidhi Mittal Hada (WT01 - Product Engineering Service)
Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 1:23 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 
>
Subject: [Openstack-dev][Manila] status=NONE when share is created

Hi All,

https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/1526284


stack@controller:~/devstack$ manila create NFS 1 --name share5 --share-type 
GENERAL_Storage
+-+--+
| Property | Value |
+-+--+
| status | None 

 |
| share_type_name | GENERAL_Storage |
| description | None |
| availability_zone | None |
| share_network_id | None |
| export_locations | [] |
| share_server_id | None |
| host | None |
| snapshot_id | None |
| is_public | False |
| task_state | None |
| snapshot_support | True |
| id | 6572a26a-2313-4a1d-8765-4a031ec0ae3a |
| size | 1 |
| name | share5 |
| share_type | 961b767b-b8e4-4769-884f-7214af944f29 |
| created_at | 2015-12-15T11:31:23.818642 |
| export_location | None |
| share_proto | NFS |
| consistency_group_id | None |
| source_cgsnapshot_member_id | None |
| project_id | 0e15488bc7a14ce5b530920c95357457 |
| metadata | {} |
+-+--+

status should be "creating".. but it's being shown as "NONE" which is not right.

I am working on this bug. I have a doubt. code is as below.
In file manila/share/api.py

try:
234 share = self.db.share_create(context, options,
235  
create_share_instance=False)>>
236 QUOTAS.commit(context, reservations)
237 except Exception:
238 with excutils.save_and_reraise_exception():
239 try:
240 self.db.share_delete(context, share['id'])
241 finally:
242 QUOTAS.rollback(context, reservations)


Where we are intentionally giving create_share_instance=False that means in db 
function
share_create(), share Instance will not be created And status is a field in 
share_instances table only.

Hence it will come as "None" only till instance is created.

Is this an "intentional step" to show status as "None"..

is this bug not valid?

Please suggest.

Thanks
Nidhi
The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to 
this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may 
contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. 
Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and 
any attachments. WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The 
recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of 
viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus 
transmitted by this email. www.wipro.com
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [Openstack-dev][Manila] status=NONE when share is created

[nidhi.hada]

Hi All,

https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/1526284


stack@controller:~/devstack$ manila create NFS 1 --name share5 --share-type 
GENERAL_Storage
+-+--+
| Property | Value |
+-+--+
| status | None 

 |
| share_type_name | GENERAL_Storage |
| description | None |
| availability_zone | None |
| share_network_id | None |
| export_locations | [] |
| share_server_id | None |
| host | None |
| snapshot_id | None |
| is_public | False |
| task_state | None |
| snapshot_support | True |
| id | 6572a26a-2313-4a1d-8765-4a031ec0ae3a |
| size | 1 |
| name | share5 |
| share_type | 961b767b-b8e4-4769-884f-7214af944f29 |
| created_at | 2015-12-15T11:31:23.818642 |
| export_location | None |
| share_proto | NFS |
| consistency_group_id | None |
| source_cgsnapshot_member_id | None |
| project_id | 0e15488bc7a14ce5b530920c95357457 |
| metadata | {} |
+-+--+

status should be "creating".. but it's being shown as "NONE" which is not right.

I am working on this bug. I have a doubt. code is as below.
In file manila/share/api.py

try:
234 share = self.db.share_create(context, options,
235  
create_share_instance=False)>>
236 QUOTAS.commit(context, reservations)
237 except Exception:
238 with excutils.save_and_reraise_exception():
239 try:
240 self.db.share_delete(context, share['id'])
241 finally:
242 QUOTAS.rollback(context, reservations)


Where we are intentionally giving create_share_instance=False that means in db 
function
share_create(), share Instance will not be created And status is a field in 
share_instances table only.

Hence it will come as "None" only till instance is created.

Is this an "intentional step" to show status as "None"..

is this bug not valid?

Please suggest.

Thanks
Nidhi
The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to 
this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may 
contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. 
Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and 
any attachments. WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The 
recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of 
viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus 
transmitted by this email. www.wipro.com
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-dev][Manila] running tox py27 - unit tests - very slow - can i run it in parts?

[nidhi.hada]

Thank you very much Martin.


-Original Message-
From: Martin Hickey [mailto:martin.hic...@ie.ibm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 5:56 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 

Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-dev][Manila] running tox py27 - unit 
tests - very slow - can i run it in parts?

Hi Nidhi,

You can run particular tests as follows:
tox -e py27 

For example in neutron, you could run: tox -e py27 
neutron.tests.unit.test_manager.NeutronManagerTestCase

I hope this helps.

Regards,
Martin




From:   
To: 
Date:   22/12/2015 12:18
Subject:[openstack-dev] [Openstack-dev][Manila] running tox py27 - unit
tests - very slow - can i run it in parts?



Hi all,

While doing some development I changed a unit test.
To confirm test is passing or not I am running tox –v –epy27.
Now its very very slow .. takes a lot of time complete its run ..
Difficult during development to make changes and test..


Is there a way that I can run some unit tests specifically ?
Is there a way that I test unit test in parts .. not all ..

during development it will be helpful ..

Plz give any idea if you have.


Thanks
Nidhi



The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to 
this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may 
contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. 
Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and 
any attachments. WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The 
recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of 
viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus 
transmitted by this email. www.wipro.com 
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to 
this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may 
contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. 
Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and 
any attachments. WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The 
recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of 
viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus 
transmitted by this email. www.wipro.com
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [Openstack-dev][Manila] running tox py27 - unit tests - very slow - can i run it in parts?

[nidhi.hada]

Hi all,

While doing some development I changed a unit test.
To confirm test is passing or not I am running tox -v -epy27.
Now its very very slow .. takes a lot of time complete its run ..
Difficult during development to make changes and test..


Is there a way that I can run some unit tests specifically ?
Is there a way that I test unit test in parts .. not all ..

during development it will be helpful ..

Plz give any idea if you have.


Thanks
Nidhi

The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to 
this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may 
contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. 
Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and 
any attachments. WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The 
recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of 
viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus 
transmitted by this email. www.wipro.com
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [Openstack-Dev][Manila] - Need design decision help - - https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/1503390

[nidhi.hada]

Hi all.



I am working on bug 1503390. (status=None while delete is in progress

)



I was doing analysis of problem and found that yes its there.

I reproduced it.



Now the two solutions proposed..

1)Either say the status as deleting for such snapshots ?

2)lets not list such snapshots in list ..



I see that

If we implement solution1 .. then it doesn't work as .

we reach the same Situation of (snapshot present but snapshot_instance absent)

in two cases

When snapshot is deleted and when snapshot is created ...



Now if I set status as deleting(to be shown in list for snapshots with no 
snapshot_instances)

it will be a wrong information when we are creating the snapshot.

And list function - can not differentiate state (snapshot present but 
snapshot_instance absent)

whether its due to creation or deletion.  PCIIMW...





Another way to do this is .. let create delete path set the status to a special 
state .

which if list operation obtains .. can understand how to interpret it ...

But setting status also is not possible as status resides in snapshot_instances 
table ..

row for which is not created yet in create path .. we can not set staus ...!!!




Do you think that


STATUS_NEW = 'new'
STATUS_CREATING = 'creating'
STATUS_DELETING = 'deleting'
STATUS_DELETED = 'deleted'
STATUS_ERROR = 'error'
STATUS_ERROR_DELETING = 'error_deleting'
STATUS_AVAILABLE = 'available'
STATUS_ACTIVE = 'active'
STATUS_INACTIVE = 'inactive'>
STATUS_MANAGING = 'manage_starting'
STATUS_MANAGE_ERROR = 'manage_error'
STATUS_UNMANAGING = 'unmanage_starting'
STATUS_UNMANAGE_ERROR = 'unmanage_error'
STATUS_UNMANAGED = 'unmanaged'
STATUS_EXTENDING = 'extending'

Do you think that setting state as some neutral state like state_inactive ..
will help?
it will be same in both creation and deletion path ?




so should we go with 2nd solution ? lets not show such shares in list ?





Thanks

Nidhi



The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to 
this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may 
contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. 
Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and 
any attachments. WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The 
recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of 
viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus 
transmitted by this email. www.wipro.com
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] FW: Manila Bug - Need design decision help - - https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/1503390

[nidhi.hada]

Hi all.



I am working on bug 1503390. (status=None while delete is in progress

)



I was doing analysis of problem and found that yes its there.

I reproduced it.



Now the two solutions proposed..

1)Either say the status as deleting for such snapshots ?

2)lets not list such snapshots in list ..



I see that

If we implement solution1 .. then it doesn't work as .

we reach the same Situation of (snapshot present but snapshot_instance absent)

in two cases

When snapshot is deleted and when snapshot is created ...



Now if I set status as deleting(to be shown in list for snapshots with no 
snapshot_instances)

it will be a wrong information when we are creating the snapshot.

And list function - can not differentiate state (snapshot present but 
snapshot_instance absent)

whether its due to creation or deletion.  PCIIMW...





Another way to do this is .. let create delete path set the status to a special 
state .

which if list operation obtains .. can understand how to interpret it ...

But setting status also is not possible as status resides in snapshot_instances 
table ..

row for which is not created yet in create path .. we can not set staus ...!!!




Do you think that


STATUS_NEW = 'new'
STATUS_CREATING = 'creating'
STATUS_DELETING = 'deleting'
STATUS_DELETED = 'deleted'
STATUS_ERROR = 'error'
STATUS_ERROR_DELETING = 'error_deleting'
STATUS_AVAILABLE = 'available'
STATUS_ACTIVE = 'active'
STATUS_INACTIVE = 'inactive'>
STATUS_MANAGING = 'manage_starting'
STATUS_MANAGE_ERROR = 'manage_error'
STATUS_UNMANAGING = 'unmanage_starting'
STATUS_UNMANAGE_ERROR = 'unmanage_error'
STATUS_UNMANAGED = 'unmanaged'
STATUS_EXTENDING = 'extending'

Do you think that setting state as some neutral state like state_inactive ..
will help?
it will be same in both creation and deletion path ?




so should we go with 2nd solution ? lets not show such shares in list ?





Thanks

Nidhi



The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to 
this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may 
contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. 
Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and 
any attachments. WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The 
recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of 
viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus 
transmitted by this email. www.wipro.com
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev