It hasn't been started it yet. AFAIR Nova people wanted to see it working
in Neutron first (and I asked them too late in Juno cycle), so I tried to
push it to Neutron only first.
I don't know if anyone is interested in implementing this for Nova but I'll
ask around.
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Miguel Ángel Ajo majop...@redhat.com
wrote:
Yuriy, what’s the status of the rootwrap-daemon implementation on the
nova side?, was it merged?, otherwise do you think there could be anyone
interested in picking it up?
Best regards,
--
Miguel Ángel Ajo
Sent with Sparrow http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig
On Friday, 7 de November de 2014 at 11:52, Miguel Ángel Ajo wrote:
Ohh, sad to hear that Yuriy, you were doing an awesome work. I will take
some time to re-review the final state of the code and specs, and move it
forward. Thank you very much for your contribution.
--
Miguel Ángel Ajo
Sent with Sparrow http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig
On Friday, 7 de November de 2014 at 11:44, Yuriy Taraday wrote:
Hello, Miguel.
I switched departments recently and unfortunately don't have much free
time for community work. Feel free to pick up my change requests and push
them if you have time. I'll try to keep track of these changes and give
some feedback on them on occasion, but don't wait on me.
Thank you for keeping this feature in mind. I'd be glad to see it finally
used in Neutron (and any other project).
--
Kind regards, Yuriy.
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Miguel Ángel Ajo majop...@redhat.com
wrote:
Hi Yorik,
I was talking with Mark Mcclain a minute ago here at the summit about
this. And he told me that now at the start of the cycle looks like a good
moment to merge the spec the root wrap daemon bits, so we have a lot of
headroom for testing during the next months.
We need to upgrade the spec [1] to the new Kilo format.
Do you have some time to do it?, I can allocate some time and do it
right away.
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/93889/
--
Miguel Ángel Ajo
Sent with Sparrow http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig
On Thursday, 24 de July de 2014 at 01:42, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo wrote:
+1
Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com)
-Original Message-
From: Yuriy Taraday [yorik@gmail.com]
Received: Thursday, 24 Jul 2014, 0:42
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List [openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org]
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Spec freeze exception] Rootwrap daemon
mode support
Hello.
I'd like to propose making a spec freeze exception for
rootwrap-daemon-mode spec [1].
Its goal is to save agents' execution time by using daemon mode for
rootwrap and thus avoiding python interpreter startup time as well as sudo
overhead for each call. Preliminary benchmark shows 10x+ speedup of the
rootwrap interaction itself.
This spec have a number of supporters from Neutron team (Carl and Miguel
gave it their +2 and +1) and have all code waiting for review [2], [3], [4].
The only thing that has been blocking its progress is Mark's -2 left when
oslo.rootwrap spec hasn't been merged yet. Now that's not the case and code
in oslo.rootwrap is steadily getting approved [5].
[1] https://review.openstack.org/93889
[2] https://review.openstack.org/82787
[3] https://review.openstack.org/84667
[4] https://review.openstack.org/107386
[5]
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/oslo.rootwrap+topic:bp/rootwrap-daemon-mode,n,z
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Kind regards, Yuriy.
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
