Re: [openstack-dev] [Stackalytics] Complementary projects
Some reasons of having complementary projects in Stackalytics: * to compare efforts in other communities with OpenStack - just to feed curiosity on what is larger OpenStack or Kubernetes? * to light interest to contribute to projects that OpenStack depends on, like OVS and Ansible. * to keep an eye on commercial interest and know who is sponsoring near-by technologies. I agree that adding complementary projects was an authoritarian decision and ready to remove them in the community version if TC decides so. Thanks, Ilya 2015-06-19 10:48 GMT+03:00 Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org: Paul Belanger wrote: I am wondering the reason for the complementary projects listing[1] in Stackalytics? Specifically, why does stackalytics-processor import docker and cloudfoundry projects into the stats? [1] http://stackalytics.com/?project_type=complementarymetric=commits It's not a community decision. I'd say it is an editorial decision of the current owner of the project and website. While we are trying to move this project under the Infra project team and the Technical Committee oversight, it is currently still a Stackforge project owned by Mirantis. Personally if we were to move it under Infra I would (1) remove the complementary projects and (2) make sure that whoever wants to reuse stackalytics code to track Docker / CloudFoundry activity can easily do so. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Stackalytics] Complementary projects
On 06/19/2015 09:19 AM, Ilya Shakhat wrote: Some reasons of having complementary projects in Stackalytics: * to compare efforts in other communities with OpenStack - just to feed curiosity on what is larger OpenStack or Kubernetes? * to light interest to contribute to projects that OpenStack depends on, like OVS and Ansible. * to keep an eye on commercial interest and know who is sponsoring near-by technologies. I agree that adding complementary projects was an authoritarian decision and ready to remove them in the community version if TC decides so. Hi Ilya, Personally, I quite like having those complementary projects in Stackalytics, for the reasons you note above. Best, -jay __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Stackalytics] Complementary projects
Paul Belanger wrote: I am wondering the reason for the complementary projects listing[1] in Stackalytics? Specifically, why does stackalytics-processor import docker and cloudfoundry projects into the stats? [1] http://stackalytics.com/?project_type=complementarymetric=commits It's not a community decision. I'd say it is an editorial decision of the current owner of the project and website. While we are trying to move this project under the Infra project team and the Technical Committee oversight, it is currently still a Stackforge project owned by Mirantis. Personally if we were to move it under Infra I would (1) remove the complementary projects and (2) make sure that whoever wants to reuse stackalytics code to track Docker / CloudFoundry activity can easily do so. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Stackalytics] Complementary projects
On 06/19/2015 10:31 AM, Joe Gordon wrote: On Jun 19, 2015 3:56 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On 06/19/2015 09:19 AM, Ilya Shakhat wrote: Some reasons of having complementary projects in Stackalytics: * to compare efforts in other communities with OpenStack - just to feed curiosity on what is larger OpenStack or Kubernetes? * to light interest to contribute to projects that OpenStack depends on, like OVS and Ansible. * to keep an eye on commercial interest and know who is sponsoring near-by technologies. I agree that adding complementary projects was an authoritarian decision and ready to remove them in the community version if TC decides so. Hi Ilya, Personally, I quite like having those complementary projects in Stackalytics, for the reasons you note above. Although it's not very useful for 'reviews' http://stackalytics.com/?project_type=complementary Sure, agreed :) I also wonder how well maintained the email mappings are for complementary projects. Good point. I'm sure there can be many improvements made to the support for complementary projects. I was just remarking that I find the information there to be interesting, nothing more. -jay __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Stackalytics] Complementary projects
On Jun 19, 2015 3:56 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On 06/19/2015 09:19 AM, Ilya Shakhat wrote: Some reasons of having complementary projects in Stackalytics: * to compare efforts in other communities with OpenStack - just to feed curiosity on what is larger OpenStack or Kubernetes? * to light interest to contribute to projects that OpenStack depends on, like OVS and Ansible. * to keep an eye on commercial interest and know who is sponsoring near-by technologies. I agree that adding complementary projects was an authoritarian decision and ready to remove them in the community version if TC decides so. Hi Ilya, Personally, I quite like having those complementary projects in Stackalytics, for the reasons you note above. Although it's not very useful for 'reviews' http://stackalytics.com/?project_type=complementary I also wonder how well maintained the email mappings are for complementary projects. Best, -jay __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Stackalytics] Complementary projects
On 06/19/2015 11:40 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: On 06/19/2015 10:31 AM, Joe Gordon wrote: On Jun 19, 2015 3:56 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On 06/19/2015 09:19 AM, Ilya Shakhat wrote: Some reasons of having complementary projects in Stackalytics: * to compare efforts in other communities with OpenStack - just to feed curiosity on what is larger OpenStack or Kubernetes? * to light interest to contribute to projects that OpenStack depends on, like OVS and Ansible. * to keep an eye on commercial interest and know who is sponsoring near-by technologies. I agree that adding complementary projects was an authoritarian decision and ready to remove them in the community version if TC decides so. Hi Ilya, Personally, I quite like having those complementary projects in Stackalytics, for the reasons you note above. Although it's not very useful for 'reviews' http://stackalytics.com/?project_type=complementary Sure, agreed :) I also wonder how well maintained the email mappings are for complementary projects. Good point. I'm sure there can be many improvements made to the support for complementary projects. I was just remarking that I find the information there to be interesting, nothing more. I also find it interesting. I, in fact, added the ansible and python packaging related repos to the list, because I found it interesting. It's also nice to see that we're not completely insular - that we, as OpenStack, also work with others. We have humans working in both openstack and openvswitch, for instance. And who are working in ansible and openstack. Etc. I think that's a great positive thing to be able to highlight - we are, after all, not an island to ourselves, but are part of a larger community. So, my vote will be to keep them. I'm only one vote, of course, but I think it would be a shame to get rid of them. Monty __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [Stackalytics] Complementary projects
Greetings, I am wondering the reason for the complementary projects listing[1] in Stackalytics? Specifically, why does stackalytics-processor import docker and cloudfoundry projects into the stats? [1] http://stackalytics.com/?project_type=complementarymetric=commits __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
