Re: [openstack-dev] [all][infra] ubuntu-bionic and legacy nodesets
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 08:16:07AM +0100, Jean-Philippe Evrard wrote: > That's very cool. > Any idea of the repartition of nodes xenial vs bionic? Is that a very > restricted amount of nodes? > According to upstream, ubuntu-bionic releases next week. In openstack-infra we are in really good shape to have projects start using it once we rebuild using the released version. Projects are able to use ubuntu-bionic today, we just ask they don't gate on them until the official release. As for switching the PTI job to use ubuntu-bionic, that is a different discussion. It would bump python to 3.6 and likely be too late in the cycle to do it. I guess something we can hash out with infra / requirements / tc / EALLTHEPROJECTS. -Paul > > On 20 April 2018 at 00:37, Paul Belangerwrote: > > Greetings, > > > > With ubuntu-bionic release around the corner we'll be starting discussions > > about > > migrating jobs from ubuntu-xenial to ubuntu-bionic. > > > > On topic I'd like to raise, is round job migrations from legacy to native > > zuulv3. Specifically, I'd like to propose we do not add > > legacy-ubuntu-bionic > > nodesets into openstack-zuul-jobs. Projects should be working towards moving > > away from the legacy format, as they were just copypasta from our previous > > JJB > > templates. > > > > Projects would still be free to move them intree, but I would highly > > encourage > > projects do not do this, as it only delays the issue. > > > > The good news is the majority of jobs have already been moved to native > > zuulv3 > > jobs, but there are still some projects still depending on the legacy > > nodesets. > > For example, tox bases jobs would not be affected. It mostly would be dsvm > > based jobs that haven't been switch to use the new devstack jobs for zuulv3. > > > > -Paul > > > > __ > > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [all][infra] ubuntu-bionic and legacy nodesets
That's very cool. Any idea of the repartition of nodes xenial vs bionic? Is that a very restricted amount of nodes? On 20 April 2018 at 00:37, Paul Belangerwrote: > Greetings, > > With ubuntu-bionic release around the corner we'll be starting discussions > about > migrating jobs from ubuntu-xenial to ubuntu-bionic. > > On topic I'd like to raise, is round job migrations from legacy to native > zuulv3. Specifically, I'd like to propose we do not add legacy-ubuntu-bionic > nodesets into openstack-zuul-jobs. Projects should be working towards moving > away from the legacy format, as they were just copypasta from our previous JJB > templates. > > Projects would still be free to move them intree, but I would highly encourage > projects do not do this, as it only delays the issue. > > The good news is the majority of jobs have already been moved to native zuulv3 > jobs, but there are still some projects still depending on the legacy > nodesets. > For example, tox bases jobs would not be affected. It mostly would be dsvm > based jobs that haven't been switch to use the new devstack jobs for zuulv3. > > -Paul > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [all][infra] ubuntu-bionic and legacy nodesets
Greetings, With ubuntu-bionic release around the corner we'll be starting discussions about migrating jobs from ubuntu-xenial to ubuntu-bionic. On topic I'd like to raise, is round job migrations from legacy to native zuulv3. Specifically, I'd like to propose we do not add legacy-ubuntu-bionic nodesets into openstack-zuul-jobs. Projects should be working towards moving away from the legacy format, as they were just copypasta from our previous JJB templates. Projects would still be free to move them intree, but I would highly encourage projects do not do this, as it only delays the issue. The good news is the majority of jobs have already been moved to native zuulv3 jobs, but there are still some projects still depending on the legacy nodesets. For example, tox bases jobs would not be affected. It mostly would be dsvm based jobs that haven't been switch to use the new devstack jobs for zuulv3. -Paul __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev