Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][horizon] FWaaS/VPNaaS dashboard split out from horizon
Thanks Akihiro. From an FWaaS perspective, in agreement with Takashi on points below. On repository name, I am not religious as long as we keep things consistent. Thanks Sridar On 6/1/17, 12:59 AM, "Takashi Yamamoto" wrote: >On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 10:12 PM, Akihiro Motoki >wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> As discussed last month [1], we agree that each neutron-related >> dashboard has its own repository. >> I would like to move this forward on FWaaS and VPNaaS >> as the horizon team plans to split them out as horizon plugins. >> >> A couple of questions hit me. >> >> (1) launchpad project >> Do we create a new launchpad project for each dashboard? >> At now, FWaaS and VPNaaS projects use 'neutron' for their bug tracking >> from the historical reason, it sometimes There are two choices: the >> one is to accept dashboard bugs in 'neutron' launchpad, >> and the other is to have a separate launchpad project. >> >> My vote is to create a separate launchpad project. >> It allows users to search and file bugs easily. > >+1 > >> >> (2) repository name >> >> Are neutron-fwaas-dashboard / neutron-vpnaas-dashboard good repository >> names for you? >> Most horizon related projects use -dashboard or -ui as their >>repo names. >> I personally prefers to -dashboard as it is consistent with the >> OpenStack dashboard >> (the official name of horizon). On the other hand, I know some folks >> prefer to -ui >> as the name is shorter enough. >> Any preference? > >+1 for -dashboard. >-ui sounds too generic to me. > >> >> (3) governance >> neutron-fwaas project is under the neutron project. >> Does it sound okay to have neutron-fwaas-dashboard under the neutron >>project? >> This is what the neutron team does for neutron-lbaas-dashboard before >> and this model is adopted in most horizon plugins (like trove, sahara >> or others). > >+1 > >> >> (4) initial core team >> >> My thought is to have neutron-fwaas/vpnaas-core and horizon-core as >> the initial core team. >> The release team and the stable team follow what we have for >> neutron-fwaas/vpnaas projects. >> Sounds reasonable? > >+1 > >> >> >> Finally, I already prepare the split out version of FWaaS and VPNaaS >> dashboards in my personal github repos. >> Once we agree in the questions above, I will create the repositories >> under git.openstack.org. > >great, thank you. > >> >> [1] >>http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-April/thread.html >>#115200 >> >> >>_ >>_ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: >>openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >__ >OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][horizon] FWaaS/VPNaaS dashboard split out from horizon
On 31/05/17 15:12, Akihiro Motoki wrote: Hi all, As discussed last month [1], we agree that each neutron-related dashboard has its own repository. I would like to move this forward on FWaaS and VPNaaS as the horizon team plans to split them out as horizon plugins. A couple of questions hit me. (1) launchpad project Do we create a new launchpad project for each dashboard? At now, FWaaS and VPNaaS projects use 'neutron' for their bug tracking from the historical reason, it sometimes There are two choices: the one is to accept dashboard bugs in 'neutron' launchpad, and the other is to have a separate launchpad project. My vote is to create a separate launchpad project. It allows users to search and file bugs easily. +1 (2) repository name Are neutron-fwaas-dashboard / neutron-vpnaas-dashboard good repository names for you? Most horizon related projects use -dashboard or -ui as their repo names. I personally prefers to -dashboard as it is consistent with the OpenStack dashboard (the official name of horizon). On the other hand, I know some folks prefer to -ui as the name is shorter enough. Any preference? +1 for dashboard, it goes with the openstack-dashboard theme. (3) governance neutron-fwaas project is under the neutron project. Does it sound okay to have neutron-fwaas-dashboard under the neutron project? This is what the neutron team does for neutron-lbaas-dashboard before and this model is adopted in most horizon plugins (like trove, sahara or others). +1 (4) initial core team My thought is to have neutron-fwaas/vpnaas-core and horizon-core as the initial core team. The release team and the stable team follow what we have for neutron-fwaas/vpnaas projects. Sounds reasonable? +1 Finally, I already prepare the split out version of FWaaS and VPNaaS dashboards in my personal github repos. Once we agree in the questions above, I will create the repositories under git.openstack.org. [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-April/thread.html#115200 Thank for doing this work! __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][horizon] FWaaS/VPNaaS dashboard split out from horizon
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 10:12 PM, Akihiro Motoki wrote: > Hi all, > > As discussed last month [1], we agree that each neutron-related > dashboard has its own repository. > I would like to move this forward on FWaaS and VPNaaS > as the horizon team plans to split them out as horizon plugins. > > A couple of questions hit me. > > (1) launchpad project > Do we create a new launchpad project for each dashboard? > At now, FWaaS and VPNaaS projects use 'neutron' for their bug tracking > from the historical reason, it sometimes There are two choices: the > one is to accept dashboard bugs in 'neutron' launchpad, > and the other is to have a separate launchpad project. > > My vote is to create a separate launchpad project. > It allows users to search and file bugs easily. +1 > > (2) repository name > > Are neutron-fwaas-dashboard / neutron-vpnaas-dashboard good repository > names for you? > Most horizon related projects use -dashboard or -ui as their repo > names. > I personally prefers to -dashboard as it is consistent with the > OpenStack dashboard > (the official name of horizon). On the other hand, I know some folks > prefer to -ui > as the name is shorter enough. > Any preference? +1 for -dashboard. -ui sounds too generic to me. > > (3) governance > neutron-fwaas project is under the neutron project. > Does it sound okay to have neutron-fwaas-dashboard under the neutron project? > This is what the neutron team does for neutron-lbaas-dashboard before > and this model is adopted in most horizon plugins (like trove, sahara > or others). +1 > > (4) initial core team > > My thought is to have neutron-fwaas/vpnaas-core and horizon-core as > the initial core team. > The release team and the stable team follow what we have for > neutron-fwaas/vpnaas projects. > Sounds reasonable? +1 > > > Finally, I already prepare the split out version of FWaaS and VPNaaS > dashboards in my personal github repos. > Once we agree in the questions above, I will create the repositories > under git.openstack.org. great, thank you. > > [1] > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-April/thread.html#115200 > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][horizon] FWaaS/VPNaaS dashboard split out from horizon
> -Original Message- > From: Akihiro Motoki [mailto:amot...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 6:13 AM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List > Subject: [openstack-dev] [neutron][horizon] FWaaS/VPNaaS dashboard split > out from horizon > > Hi all, > > As discussed last month [1], we agree that each neutron-related dashboard has > its own repository. > I would like to move this forward on FWaaS and VPNaaS as the horizon team > plans to split them out as horizon plugins. > > A couple of questions hit me. > > (1) launchpad project > Do we create a new launchpad project for each dashboard? > At now, FWaaS and VPNaaS projects use 'neutron' for their bug tracking from > the historical reason, it sometimes There are two choices: the one is to > accept > dashboard bugs in 'neutron' launchpad, and the other is to have a separate > launchpad project. +1 for separating Launchpad we can one for each and each can cover all the issues related To it. > My vote is to create a separate launchpad project. > It allows users to search and file bugs easily. > > (2) repository name > > Are neutron-fwaas-dashboard / neutron-vpnaas-dashboard good repository > names for you? > Most horizon related projects use -dashboard or -ui as their repo > names. > I personally prefers to -dashboard as it is consistent with the OpenStack > dashboard (the official name of horizon). On the other hand, I know some folks > prefer to -ui as the name is shorter enough. > Any preference? Both looks good, but using ui will make it shorter so +1 for ui > (3) governance > neutron-fwaas project is under the neutron project. > Does it sound okay to have neutron-fwaas-dashboard under the neutron > project? > This is what the neutron team does for neutron-lbaas-dashboard before and > this model is adopted in most horizon plugins (like trove, sahara or others). IMO, we can have it under neutron project for now but for simplicity and maintenance I'd suggest to branch it out from neutron. > (4) initial core team > > My thought is to have neutron-fwaas/vpnaas-core and horizon-core as the > initial core team. > The release team and the stable team follow what we have for neutron- > fwaas/vpnaas projects. > Sounds reasonable? > > > Finally, I already prepare the split out version of FWaaS and VPNaaS > dashboards in my personal github repos. > Once we agree in the questions above, I will create the repositories under > git.openstack.org. > > [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017- > April/thread.html#115200 > > _ > _ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [neutron][horizon] FWaaS/VPNaaS dashboard split out from horizon
Hi all, As discussed last month [1], we agree that each neutron-related dashboard has its own repository. I would like to move this forward on FWaaS and VPNaaS as the horizon team plans to split them out as horizon plugins. A couple of questions hit me. (1) launchpad project Do we create a new launchpad project for each dashboard? At now, FWaaS and VPNaaS projects use 'neutron' for their bug tracking from the historical reason, it sometimes There are two choices: the one is to accept dashboard bugs in 'neutron' launchpad, and the other is to have a separate launchpad project. My vote is to create a separate launchpad project. It allows users to search and file bugs easily. (2) repository name Are neutron-fwaas-dashboard / neutron-vpnaas-dashboard good repository names for you? Most horizon related projects use -dashboard or -ui as their repo names. I personally prefers to -dashboard as it is consistent with the OpenStack dashboard (the official name of horizon). On the other hand, I know some folks prefer to -ui as the name is shorter enough. Any preference? (3) governance neutron-fwaas project is under the neutron project. Does it sound okay to have neutron-fwaas-dashboard under the neutron project? This is what the neutron team does for neutron-lbaas-dashboard before and this model is adopted in most horizon plugins (like trove, sahara or others). (4) initial core team My thought is to have neutron-fwaas/vpnaas-core and horizon-core as the initial core team. The release team and the stable team follow what we have for neutron-fwaas/vpnaas projects. Sounds reasonable? Finally, I already prepare the split out version of FWaaS and VPNaaS dashboards in my personal github repos. Once we agree in the questions above, I will create the repositories under git.openstack.org. [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-April/thread.html#115200 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev