Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] put router in vm rather than namespace

[Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo]

That adds more latency, I believe some vendor plugins do it like that
(service VM).

Have you checked out networking-ovn?, it's all done in openflow, and you
have Ha (A/P) for free without extra namespaces, just flows and bfd
monitoring.

On Dec 4, 2017 4:22 PM, "Jaze Lee"  wrote:

> Hello,
> Can we put router into virtual machine rather than in namespace? Then
> the HA, and devops will be more elegant. You can live mirage, and use
> haproxy.
> The namespace can not be live mirage. It is bind to the host and lose
> flexible.
> Or is there some talks or specs about this?
>
> --
> 谦谦君子
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [neutron] put router in vm rather than namespace

[Jaze Lee]

Hello,
Can we put router into virtual machine rather than in namespace? Then
the HA, and devops will be more elegant. You can live mirage, and use haproxy.
The namespace can not be live mirage. It is bind to the host and lose flexible.
Or is there some talks or specs about this?

-- 
谦谦君子

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev