Re: [Openstack-operators] Case studies on Openstack HA architecture

[Mohammed Naser]

We've also always done the same.  We deploy any cloud with a minimum of 3 
(quorum, etc) but when the database or message queue needs to scale up, the 
other components probably need to as well so making an equal replica of 
everything across the environment. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Aug 26, 2017, at 9:13 AM, David Medberry  wrote:
> 
> I'm not aware of any studies as per se, but we have long run rabbitmq, MySQL, 
> and all the API endpoints on the same three nodes. 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Aug 25, 2017 6:12 PM, "Imtiaz Chowdhury"  
>> wrote:
>> Hi Openstack operators,
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Most Openstack HA deployment use 3 node database cluster, 3 node rabbitMQ 
>> cluster and 3 Controllers. I am wondering whether there are any studies done 
>> that show the pros and cons of co-locating database and messaging service 
>> with the Openstack control services.  In other words, I am very interested 
>> in learning about advantages and disadvantages, in terms of ease of 
>> deployment, upgrade and overall API performance, of having 3 all-in-one 
>> Openstack controller over a more distributed deployment model.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> References to any work done in this area will be highly appreciated.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Thanks, 
>> Imtiaz
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> OpenStack-operators mailing list
>> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>> 
> ___
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Re: [Openstack-operators] Case studies on Openstack HA architecture

[David Medberry]

I'm not aware of any studies as per se, but we have long run rabbitmq,
MySQL, and all the API endpoints on the same three nodes.



On Aug 25, 2017 6:12 PM, "Imtiaz Chowdhury" 
wrote:

> Hi Openstack operators,
>
>
>
> Most Openstack HA deployment use 3 node database cluster, 3 node rabbitMQ
> cluster and 3 Controllers. I am wondering whether there are any studies
> done that show the pros and cons of co-locating database and messaging
> service with the Openstack control services.  In other words, I am very
> interested in learning about advantages and disadvantages, in terms of ease
> of deployment, upgrade and overall API performance, of having 3 all-in-one
> Openstack controller over a more distributed deployment model.
>
>
>
> References to any work done in this area will be highly appreciated.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Imtiaz
>
>
>
> ___
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
>
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators