Re: [opensuse-arm] armv7l platform is missed for docker registry.opensuse.org/opensuse/tumbleweed:latest
чт, 6 февр. 2020 г. в 11:32, Matwey V. Kornilov :
>
> чт, 6 февр. 2020 г. в 11:27, Adrian Schröter :
> >
> > On Donnerstag, 6. Februar 2020, 09:17:49 CET Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
> > > чт, 6 февр. 2020 г. в 11:15, Adrian Schröter :
> > > >
> > > > On Donnerstag, 6. Februar 2020, 09:13:24 CET Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
> > > > > чт, 6 февр. 2020 г. в 11:12, Adrian Schröter :
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mittwoch, 5. Februar 2020, 18:07:56 CET Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
> > > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Here (https://registry.opensuse.org/cgi-bin/cooverview ) I see
> > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > opensuse/tubmleweed multiplatform docker image supports the
> > > > > > > following
> > > > > > > platforms:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > aarch64
> > > > > > > armv6l
> > > > > > > i586
> > > > > > > ppc64le
> > > > > > > x86_64
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > However, armv7l is missed for some reason. How could we get it
> > > > > > > back?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The docker registry only knows "arm" and "arm64". So armv6l is
> > > > > > overwriting armv7hl :/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Guillaume and me decided to unpublish armv6l for now until we found
> > > > > > a solution.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Renaming the image is bad for references, so I guess we need to
> > > > > > publish armv6l in a
> > > > > > different repository.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Fabian, do you have an opinion here?
> > > > >
> > > > > I remember, that once I saw that correct docker platform names are
> > > > > linux/arm/v6 and linux/arm/v7
> > > >
> > > > you mean having it in a different repository? yes, that was my
> > > > proposal as well.
> > >
> > > No, I mean docker platform names. Look here:
> > >
> > > https://www.docker.com/blog/getting-started-with-docker-for-arm-on-linux/
> > >
> > > Docker people use "Platform: linux/arm64" for aarch64 and "Platform:
> > > linux/arm/v7" for armv7.
> >
> > Hm, can you find a real life example in any registry?
> >
>
> > docker run mplatform/mquery postgres
> Image: postgres
> * Manifest List: Yes
> * Supported platforms:
>- linux/amd64
>- linux/arm/v5
>- linux/arm/v7
>- linux/arm64
>- linux/386
>- linux/ppc64le
>- linux/s390x
>
> > docker run mplatform/mquery ubuntu
> Image: ubuntu
> * Manifest List: Yes
> * Supported platforms:
>- linux/amd64
>- linux/arm/v7
>- linux/arm64
>- linux/386
>- linux/ppc64le
>- linux/s390x
>
I am sorry. You are right here. It seems that "v7" after "arm" is a
"variant" not "architecture":
"platform": {
"architecture": "arm",
"os": "linux",
"variant": "v7"
}
However, as a user, I anyway have to use the full platform specification string:
docker run --platform=linux/arm/v7
> > I like to look at the manifest, because I have no clue atm how this
> > platform string
> > is stored there. It should look like
> >
> > "platform" : {
> > "architecture" : "amd64",
> > "os" : "linux"
> > }
> >
> > but architecture is limited to "Go" architectures which only knows "arm"...
> >
> > They may (mis)use the version string for this?
> >
> > Maybe an option...
> >
> > --
> >
> > Adrian Schroeter
> > Build Infrastructure Project Manager
> >
> > SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nuernberg,
> > Germany
> > (HRB 247165, AG München), Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> With best regards,
> Matwey V. Kornilov
--
With best regards,
Matwey V. Kornilov
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscr...@opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+ow...@opensuse.org
Re: [opensuse-arm] armv7l platform is missed for docker registry.opensuse.org/opensuse/tumbleweed:latest
On Donnerstag, 6. Februar 2020, 09:23:41 CET Adrian Schröter wrote:
> On Donnerstag, 6. Februar 2020, 09:17:49 CET Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
> > чт, 6 февр. 2020 г. в 11:15, Adrian Schröter :
> > >
> > > On Donnerstag, 6. Februar 2020, 09:13:24 CET Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
> > > > чт, 6 февр. 2020 г. в 11:12, Adrian Schröter :
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mittwoch, 5. Februar 2020, 18:07:56 CET Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
> > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Here (https://registry.opensuse.org/cgi-bin/cooverview ) I see that
> > > > > > opensuse/tubmleweed multiplatform docker image supports the
> > > > > > following
> > > > > > platforms:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > aarch64
> > > > > > armv6l
> > > > > > i586
> > > > > > ppc64le
> > > > > > x86_64
> > > > > >
> > > > > > However, armv7l is missed for some reason. How could we get it back?
> > > > >
> > > > > The docker registry only knows "arm" and "arm64". So armv6l is
> > > > > overwriting armv7hl :/
> > > > >
> > > > > Guillaume and me decided to unpublish armv6l for now until we found a
> > > > > solution.
> > > > >
> > > > > Renaming the image is bad for references, so I guess we need to
> > > > > publish armv6l in a
> > > > > different repository.
> > > > >
> > > > > Fabian, do you have an opinion here?
> > > >
> > > > I remember, that once I saw that correct docker platform names are
> > > > linux/arm/v6 and linux/arm/v7
> > >
> > > you mean having it in a different repository? yes, that was my
> > > proposal as well.
> >
> > No, I mean docker platform names. Look here:
> >
> > https://www.docker.com/blog/getting-started-with-docker-for-arm-on-linux/
> >
> > Docker people use "Platform: linux/arm64" for aarch64 and "Platform:
> > linux/arm/v7" for armv7.
>
> Hm, can you find a real life example in any registry?
>
> I like to look at the manifest, because I have no clue atm how this platform
> string
> is stored there. It should look like
>
> "platform" : {
> "architecture" : "amd64",
> "os" : "linux"
> }
>
> but architecture is limited to "Go" architectures which only knows "arm"...
>
> They may (mis)use the version string for this?
ah, "variant" might be a way to go ... anyway, would be great if you find
a real life example out there...
--
Adrian Schroeter
Build Infrastructure Project Manager
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany
(HRB 247165, AG München), Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscr...@opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+ow...@opensuse.org
Re: [opensuse-arm] armv7l platform is missed for docker registry.opensuse.org/opensuse/tumbleweed:latest
On Donnerstag, 6. Februar 2020, 09:17:49 CET Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
> чт, 6 февр. 2020 г. в 11:15, Adrian Schröter :
> >
> > On Donnerstag, 6. Februar 2020, 09:13:24 CET Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
> > > чт, 6 февр. 2020 г. в 11:12, Adrian Schröter :
> > > >
> > > > On Mittwoch, 5. Februar 2020, 18:07:56 CET Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
> > > > > Here (https://registry.opensuse.org/cgi-bin/cooverview ) I see that
> > > > > opensuse/tubmleweed multiplatform docker image supports the following
> > > > > platforms:
> > > > >
> > > > > aarch64
> > > > > armv6l
> > > > > i586
> > > > > ppc64le
> > > > > x86_64
> > > > >
> > > > > However, armv7l is missed for some reason. How could we get it back?
> > > >
> > > > The docker registry only knows "arm" and "arm64". So armv6l is
> > > > overwriting armv7hl :/
> > > >
> > > > Guillaume and me decided to unpublish armv6l for now until we found a
> > > > solution.
> > > >
> > > > Renaming the image is bad for references, so I guess we need to publish
> > > > armv6l in a
> > > > different repository.
> > > >
> > > > Fabian, do you have an opinion here?
> > >
> > > I remember, that once I saw that correct docker platform names are
> > > linux/arm/v6 and linux/arm/v7
> >
> > you mean having it in a different repository? yes, that was my
> > proposal as well.
>
> No, I mean docker platform names. Look here:
>
> https://www.docker.com/blog/getting-started-with-docker-for-arm-on-linux/
>
> Docker people use "Platform: linux/arm64" for aarch64 and "Platform:
> linux/arm/v7" for armv7.
Hm, can you find a real life example in any registry?
I like to look at the manifest, because I have no clue atm how this platform
string
is stored there. It should look like
"platform" : {
"architecture" : "amd64",
"os" : "linux"
}
but architecture is limited to "Go" architectures which only knows "arm"...
They may (mis)use the version string for this?
Maybe an option...
--
Adrian Schroeter
Build Infrastructure Project Manager
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany
(HRB 247165, AG München), Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscr...@opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+ow...@opensuse.org
Re: [opensuse-arm] armv7l platform is missed for docker registry.opensuse.org/opensuse/tumbleweed:latest
чт, 6 февр. 2020 г. в 11:15, Adrian Schröter : > > On Donnerstag, 6. Februar 2020, 09:13:24 CET Matwey V. Kornilov wrote: > > чт, 6 февр. 2020 г. в 11:12, Adrian Schröter : > > > > > > On Mittwoch, 5. Februar 2020, 18:07:56 CET Matwey V. Kornilov wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > Here (https://registry.opensuse.org/cgi-bin/cooverview ) I see that > > > > opensuse/tubmleweed multiplatform docker image supports the following > > > > platforms: > > > > > > > > aarch64 > > > > armv6l > > > > i586 > > > > ppc64le > > > > x86_64 > > > > > > > > However, armv7l is missed for some reason. How could we get it back? > > > > > > The docker registry only knows "arm" and "arm64". So armv6l is > > > overwriting armv7hl :/ > > > > > > Guillaume and me decided to unpublish armv6l for now until we found a > > > solution. > > > > > > Renaming the image is bad for references, so I guess we need to publish > > > armv6l in a > > > different repository. > > > > > > Fabian, do you have an opinion here? > > > > I remember, that once I saw that correct docker platform names are > > linux/arm/v6 and linux/arm/v7 > > you mean having it in a different repository? yes, that was my > proposal as well. No, I mean docker platform names. Look here: https://www.docker.com/blog/getting-started-with-docker-for-arm-on-linux/ Docker people use "Platform: linux/arm64" for aarch64 and "Platform: linux/arm/v7" for armv7. > > The architecture names can not contain these strings > > -- > > Adrian Schroeter > Build Infrastructure Project Manager > > SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany > (HRB 247165, AG München), Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer > > > > -- With best regards, Matwey V. Kornilov -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscr...@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+ow...@opensuse.org
Re: [opensuse-arm] armv7l platform is missed for docker registry.opensuse.org/opensuse/tumbleweed:latest
On Donnerstag, 6. Februar 2020, 09:13:24 CET Matwey V. Kornilov wrote: > чт, 6 февр. 2020 г. в 11:12, Adrian Schröter : > > > > On Mittwoch, 5. Februar 2020, 18:07:56 CET Matwey V. Kornilov wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > Here (https://registry.opensuse.org/cgi-bin/cooverview ) I see that > > > opensuse/tubmleweed multiplatform docker image supports the following > > > platforms: > > > > > > aarch64 > > > armv6l > > > i586 > > > ppc64le > > > x86_64 > > > > > > However, armv7l is missed for some reason. How could we get it back? > > > > The docker registry only knows "arm" and "arm64". So armv6l is overwriting > > armv7hl :/ > > > > Guillaume and me decided to unpublish armv6l for now until we found a > > solution. > > > > Renaming the image is bad for references, so I guess we need to publish > > armv6l in a > > different repository. > > > > Fabian, do you have an opinion here? > > I remember, that once I saw that correct docker platform names are > linux/arm/v6 and linux/arm/v7 you mean having it in a different repository? yes, that was my proposal as well. The architecture names can not contain these strings -- Adrian Schroeter Build Infrastructure Project Manager SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany (HRB 247165, AG München), Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscr...@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+ow...@opensuse.org
Re: [opensuse-arm] armv7l platform is missed for docker registry.opensuse.org/opensuse/tumbleweed:latest
чт, 6 февр. 2020 г. в 11:12, Adrian Schröter : > > On Mittwoch, 5. Februar 2020, 18:07:56 CET Matwey V. Kornilov wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Here (https://registry.opensuse.org/cgi-bin/cooverview ) I see that > > opensuse/tubmleweed multiplatform docker image supports the following > > platforms: > > > > aarch64 > > armv6l > > i586 > > ppc64le > > x86_64 > > > > However, armv7l is missed for some reason. How could we get it back? > > The docker registry only knows "arm" and "arm64". So armv6l is overwriting > armv7hl :/ > > Guillaume and me decided to unpublish armv6l for now until we found a > solution. > > Renaming the image is bad for references, so I guess we need to publish > armv6l in a > different repository. > > Fabian, do you have an opinion here? I remember, that once I saw that correct docker platform names are linux/arm/v6 and linux/arm/v7 > > bye > adrian > > -- > > Adrian Schroeter > Build Infrastructure Project Manager > > SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany > (HRB 247165, AG München), Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer > > > > -- With best regards, Matwey V. Kornilov -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscr...@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+ow...@opensuse.org
Re: [opensuse-arm] armv7l platform is missed for docker registry.opensuse.org/opensuse/tumbleweed:latest
On Mittwoch, 5. Februar 2020, 18:07:56 CET Matwey V. Kornilov wrote: > Hello, > > Here (https://registry.opensuse.org/cgi-bin/cooverview ) I see that > opensuse/tubmleweed multiplatform docker image supports the following > platforms: > > aarch64 > armv6l > i586 > ppc64le > x86_64 > > However, armv7l is missed for some reason. How could we get it back? The docker registry only knows "arm" and "arm64". So armv6l is overwriting armv7hl :/ Guillaume and me decided to unpublish armv6l for now until we found a solution. Renaming the image is bad for references, so I guess we need to publish armv6l in a different repository. Fabian, do you have an opinion here? bye adrian -- Adrian Schroeter Build Infrastructure Project Manager SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany (HRB 247165, AG München), Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscr...@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+ow...@opensuse.org
[opensuse-arm] armv7l platform is missed for docker registry.opensuse.org/opensuse/tumbleweed:latest
Hello, Here (https://registry.opensuse.org/cgi-bin/cooverview ) I see that opensuse/tubmleweed multiplatform docker image supports the following platforms: aarch64 armv6l i586 ppc64le x86_64 However, armv7l is missed for some reason. How could we get it back? -- With best regards, Matwey V. Kornilov -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscr...@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+ow...@opensuse.org
