Re: [OS-webwork] [WW2] new ServletRedirectResult feature
-1 We'll never get 1.3 final out if we keep adding stuff (no matter how useful it is). Joseph, next time submit your hack to the project. Even if it is a gross hack, the idea could have been carried forward and refactored with help from others. --- Joseph Fifield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Awesome! I recently needed something like this and couldn't find it in 1.3. I came up with a solution by extending RedirectAction, but it was very much a gross hack :( Is there any way something like this could be included in some upcoming 1.x release? Oh, and if I missed something and it's already supported there, my apologies! Joe __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
RE: [OS-webwork] [WW2] new ServletRedirectResult feature
Sorry, I did not intend it to be for 1.3. With 1.3 at RC2, I wouldn't expect new features to be added. I should have been clearer, some upcoming 1.x release should have read some upcoming 1.3 release (I'm assuming there will be). If there will be such a release, would it still be useful for me to submit what I have? I can certainly do that if you'd like. Joe -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Wayland Chan Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 9:40 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] [WW2] new ServletRedirectResult feature -1 We'll never get 1.3 final out if we keep adding stuff (no matter how useful it is). Joseph, next time submit your hack to the project. Even if it is a gross hack, the idea could have been carried forward and refactored with help from others. --- Joseph Fifield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Awesome! I recently needed something like this and couldn't find it in 1.3. I came up with a solution by extending RedirectAction, but it was very much a gross hack :( Is there any way something like this could be included in some upcoming 1.x release? Oh, and if I missed something and it's already supported there, my apologies! Joe __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
RE: [OS-webwork] [WW2] new ServletRedirectResult feature
This is in the sandbox, not the current Webwork code. -Original Message- From: Wayland Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 9:40 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] [WW2] new ServletRedirectResult feature -1 We'll never get 1.3 final out if we keep adding stuff (no matter how useful it is). Joseph, next time submit your hack to the project. Even if it is a gross hack, the idea could have been carried forward and refactored with help from others. --- Joseph Fifield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Awesome! I recently needed something like this and couldn't find it in 1.3. I came up with a solution by extending RedirectAction, but it was very much a gross hack :( Is there any way something like this could be included in some upcoming 1.x release? Oh, and if I missed something and it's already supported there, my apologies! Joe __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
Re: [OS-webwork] [WW2] new ServletRedirectResult feature
Awesome! I recently needed something like this and couldn't find it in 1.3.
I came up with a solution by extending RedirectAction, but it was very much
a gross hack :( Is there any way something like this could be included in
some upcoming 1.x release? Oh, and if I missed something and it's already
supported there, my apologies!
Joe
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Lightbody [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: os-ww [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2003 12:56 AM
Subject: [OS-webwork] [WW2] new ServletRedirectResult feature
Just put in a dinky little new WW 2.0 feature:
ServletRedirectResult now supports putting in parameters in the location
attribute. What that means is you can do:
result name=success type=redirect
param
name=location/workflow/info.action?workflowId=${workflowId}/param
/result
And then ServletRedirectResult will look for all matching ${ .. } and use
the value stack to find the text between and insert it in. By default this
feature is turned ON, but you can turn it off with param
name=parsefalse/param. What do you guys think?
-Pat
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
RE: [OS-webwork] [WW2] new ServletRedirectResult feature
Good job Pat!
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2003 12:57 AM
To: os-ww
Subject: [OS-webwork] [WW2] new ServletRedirectResult feature
Just put in a dinky little new WW 2.0 feature:
ServletRedirectResult now supports putting in parameters in
the location attribute. What that means is you can do:
result name=success type=redirect
param
name=location/workflow/info.action?workflowId=${workflowId}/param
/result
And then ServletRedirectResult will look for all matching ${
.. } and use the value stack to find the text between and
insert it in. By default this feature is turned ON, but you
can turn it off with param name=parsefalse/param. What
do you guys think?
-Pat
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something
2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
Re: [OS-webwork] [WW2] new ServletRedirectResult feature
Yep, very very useful
On Sunday, February 9, 2003, at 01:15 AM, Mike Cannon-Brookes wrote:
I think this is the best feature I've seen in WW2 - I would use it
instantly
in about 50 places :)
-mike
On 9/2/03 4:56 PM, Patrick Lightbody ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) penned the
words:
Just put in a dinky little new WW 2.0 feature:
ServletRedirectResult now supports putting in parameters in the
location
attribute. What that means is you can do:
result name=success type=redirect
param
name=location/workflow/info.action?workflowId=${workflowId}/param
/result
And then ServletRedirectResult will look for all matching ${ .. } and
use
the value stack to find the text between and insert it in. By default
this
feature is turned ON, but you can turn it off with param
name=parsefalse/param. What do you guys think?
-Pat
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
