Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ath10k memory leak on 19.07 branch and mikrotik RB952Ui-5ac2nD?
On Sat, Dec 7, 2019 at 5:19 AM Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>
> On 12/6/19 7:02 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
> > On 12/6/19 9:44 AM, Joe Ayers wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> Possibly the same symptoms don't exist on 128MB RAM devices.
> >>>
> >>> Like there is some if condition, which is doing some nasty things on 64M
> >>> devices? I admit, that I don't have ath10k-ct source code under my
> >>> pillow, but
> >>> it doesn't make much sense to me.
> >>>
> Comparable results between above and my 64MB device. However, if the
> sleep time is extended the consumption is more
> >>>
> >>> Ok, I'll let it run overnight with 120s sleep in between.
> >>>
> I suspect this is not the intended behavior.
> >>>
> >>> No its not and it's even strange, that I'm not seeing it here if it
> >>> should
> >>> happen in the "default setup". Maybe its because:
> >>>
> >>> 1. You're using custom image (I'm using official prebuilt images)
> >>> 2. You're not providing all the steps needed to reproduce the issue
> >>> 3. I've way different hardware
> >>>
> >>> Every detail could make huge difference.
> >>>
> >>> -- ynezz
> >>
> >> On the device I am testing, it is both (2GHz) ath9k and (5GHz) ath10k.
> >>These look to be related patches to this issue:
> >>
> >> 960-0010-ath10k-limit-htt-rx-ring-size.patch
> >> 960-0011-ath10k-limit-pci-buffer-size.patch
> >>
> >> In the v19.07.0-rc2 build for the rb-nor-flash-16M-ac ar71xx image,
> >> these patches are applied to backports-4.19.85-1, but don't seem to be
> >> applied to ath10k-ct-2019-09-09-5e8cd86f.Should ath10k-ct have
> >> these and other patches?The device's installed packages do include
> >> ath10k-ct (from downloads.openwrt.org installed image).
> >
> > I think that if you need the patches for upstream ath10k, then you
> > should also apply
> > the patches to ath10k-ct.
> >
> > Platforms with more memory probably do not need or benefit from those
> > patches.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ben
> >
> Hi,
>
> I am fine with adding these patches to ath10k-ct if they solve problems.
>
> It would be nice if a description could be added to the patches so I
> know what kind of buffers are reduced there.
>
> Will someone send a patch?
>
> Hauke
>
I'm currently testing with the following patches with openwrt-19.07 on
RB952Ui-5ac2nD (hAP ac lite). Sorry, I know enough to be dangerous
to provide a description.I am seeing ~15M of RAM consumed, but
have not seen OOM kick in yet, like before. These patches are an
improvement so far -- usable 64M device.
Joe
Index:
openwrt/package/kernel/ath10k-ct/patches/960-0010-ath10k-limit-htt-rx-ring-size.patch
===
--- /dev/null
+++
openwrt/package/kernel/ath10k-ct/patches/960-0010-ath10k-limit-htt-rx-ring-size.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+--- a/ath10k-4.19/htt.h
b/ath10k-4.19/htt.h
+@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ enum htt_rx_ring_flags {
+ };
+
+ #define HTT_RX_RING_SIZE_MIN 128
+-#define HTT_RX_RING_SIZE_MAX 2048
++#define HTT_RX_RING_SIZE_MAX 512
+ #define HTT_RX_RING_SIZE HTT_RX_RING_SIZE_MAX
+ #define HTT_RX_RING_FILL_LEVEL (((HTT_RX_RING_SIZE) / 2) - 1)
+ #define HTT_RX_RING_FILL_LEVEL_DUAL_MAC (HTT_RX_RING_SIZE - 1)
Index:
openwrt/package/kernel/ath10k-ct/patches/960-0011-ath10k-limit-pci-buffer-size.patch
===
--- /dev/null
+++
openwrt/package/kernel/ath10k-ct/patches/960-0011-ath10k-limit-pci-buffer-size.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+--- a/ath10k-4.19/pci.c
b/ath10k-4.19/pci.c
+@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ static struct ce_attr host_ce_config_wla
+ .flags = CE_ATTR_FLAGS,
+ .src_nentries = 0,
+ .src_sz_max = 2048,
+- .dest_nentries = 512,
++ .dest_nentries = 128,
+ .recv_cb = ath10k_pci_htt_htc_rx_cb,
+ },
+
+@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ static struct ce_attr host_ce_config_wla
+ .flags = CE_ATTR_FLAGS,
+ .src_nentries = 0,
+ .src_sz_max = 2048,
+- .dest_nentries = 128,
++ .dest_nentries = 64,
+ .recv_cb = ath10k_pci_htc_rx_cb,
+ },
+
+@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ static struct ce_attr host_ce_config_wla
+ .flags = CE_ATTR_FLAGS,
+ .src_nentries = 0,
+ .src_sz_max = 512,
+- .dest_nentries = 512,
++ .dest_nentries = 128,
+ .recv_cb = ath10k_pci_htt_rx_cb,
+ },
+
+@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ static struct ce_attr host_ce_config_wla
+ .flags = CE_ATTR_FLAGS,
+ .src_nentries = 0,
+ .src_sz_max = 2048,
+- .dest_nentries = 128,
++ .dest_nentries = 96,
+ .recv_cb = ath10k_pci_pktlog_rx_cb,
+ },
+
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ath10k memory leak on 19.07 branch and mikrotik RB952Ui-5ac2nD?
W dniu 2019-12-06 o 18:44, Joe Ayers pisze: Possibly the same symptoms don't exist on 128MB RAM devices. Like there is some if condition, which is doing some nasty things on 64M devices? I admit, that I don't have ath10k-ct source code under my pillow, but it doesn't make much sense to me. Comparable results between above and my 64MB device. However, if the sleep time is extended the consumption is more Ok, I'll let it run overnight with 120s sleep in between. I suspect this is not the intended behavior. No its not and it's even strange, that I'm not seeing it here if it should happen in the "default setup". Maybe its because: 1. You're using custom image (I'm using official prebuilt images) 2. You're not providing all the steps needed to reproduce the issue 3. I've way different hardware Every detail could make huge difference. -- ynezz On the device I am testing, it is both (2GHz) ath9k and (5GHz) ath10k. These look to be related patches to this issue: 960-0010-ath10k-limit-htt-rx-ring-size.patch 960-0011-ath10k-limit-pci-buffer-size.patch In the v19.07.0-rc2 build for the rb-nor-flash-16M-ac ar71xx image, these patches are applied to backports-4.19.85-1, but don't seem to be applied to ath10k-ct-2019-09-09-5e8cd86f.Should ath10k-ct have these and other patches?The device's installed packages do include ath10k-ct (from downloads.openwrt.org installed image). Joe AE6XE ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel . I can only add that I got the same behaviour with my TL-WR902AC just ported to ath79 on master (based on f19e471f3206d0b5885490e52972085d2da2a10b). In about 20 minutes system was unusable - I couldn't fully copy a 4MB sysupgrade image to /tmp. Branch used to build the image is here: https://github.com/Leo-PL/openwrt/commits/tl-wr902ac-v1_ath79 I can offer my help with testing the fixes, as it seems to me that it's not the first time I observe this issue, only now I got a device affected by it. With kind regards, Lech ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ath10k memory leak on 19.07 branch and mikrotik RB952Ui-5ac2nD?
On Sat, Dec 7, 2019 at 5:19 AM Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > > On 12/6/19 7:02 PM, Ben Greear wrote: > > On 12/6/19 9:44 AM, Joe Ayers wrote: > >>> > >>> > Possibly the same symptoms don't exist on 128MB RAM devices. > >>> > >>> Like there is some if condition, which is doing some nasty things on 64M > >>> devices? I admit, that I don't have ath10k-ct source code under my > >>> pillow, but > >>> it doesn't make much sense to me. > >>> > Comparable results between above and my 64MB device. However, if the > sleep time is extended the consumption is more > >>> > >>> Ok, I'll let it run overnight with 120s sleep in between. > >>> > I suspect this is not the intended behavior. > >>> > >>> No its not and it's even strange, that I'm not seeing it here if it > >>> should > >>> happen in the "default setup". Maybe its because: > >>> > >>> 1. You're using custom image (I'm using official prebuilt images) > >>> 2. You're not providing all the steps needed to reproduce the issue > >>> 3. I've way different hardware > >>> > >>> Every detail could make huge difference. > >>> > >>> -- ynezz > >> > >> On the device I am testing, it is both (2GHz) ath9k and (5GHz) ath10k. > >>These look to be related patches to this issue: > >> > >> 960-0010-ath10k-limit-htt-rx-ring-size.patch > >> 960-0011-ath10k-limit-pci-buffer-size.patch > >> > >> In the v19.07.0-rc2 build for the rb-nor-flash-16M-ac ar71xx image, > >> these patches are applied to backports-4.19.85-1, but don't seem to be > >> applied to ath10k-ct-2019-09-09-5e8cd86f.Should ath10k-ct have > >> these and other patches?The device's installed packages do include > >> ath10k-ct (from downloads.openwrt.org installed image). > > > > I think that if you need the patches for upstream ath10k, then you > > should also apply > > the patches to ath10k-ct. > > > > Platforms with more memory probably do not need or benefit from those > > patches. > > > > Thanks, > > Ben > > > Hi, > > I am fine with adding these patches to ath10k-ct if they solve problems. > > It would be nice if a description could be added to the patches so I > know what kind of buffers are reduced there. > > Will someone send a patch? > > Hauke > Are there other patches that should be applied? package/kernel/mac80211/patches/ath: 080-ath10k_thermal_config.patch 921-ath10k_init_devices_synchronously.patch 930-ath10k_add_tpt_led_trigger.patch 960-0010-ath10k-limit-htt-rx-ring-size.patch 960-0011-ath10k-limit-pci-buffer-size.patch 972-ath10k_fix-crash-due-to-wrong-handling-of-peer_bw_rxnss_override-parameter.patch 973-ath10k_fix-band_center_freq-handling-for-VHT160-in-recent-firmwares.patch 974-ath10k_add-LED-and-GPIO-controlling-support-for-various-chipsets.patch 975-ath10k-use-tpt-trigger-by-default.patch 977-ath10k-add-support-for-configuring-management-packet.patch 978-ath10k-fix-possible-out-of-bound-access-of-ath10k_ra.patch 979-ath10k-fix-incorrect-multicast-broadcast-rate-settin.patch 980-ath10k-fix-max-antenna-gain-unit.patch 981-ath10k-adjust-tx-power-reduction-for-US-regulatory-d.patch package/kernel/ath10k-ct/patches: 161-ath10k-add-support-for-configuring-management-packet.patch 162-ath10k-fix-possible-out-of-bound-access-of-ath10k_ra.patch 163-ath10k-fix-incorrect-multicast-broadcast-rate-settin.patch 164-ath10k-commit-rates-from-mac80211.patch 201-ath10k-4.16_add-LED-and-GPIO-controlling-support-for-various-chipsets.patch 202-ath10k-4.16-use-tpt-trigger-by-default.patch 203-ath10k-Limit-available-channels-via-DT-ieee80211-fre.patch ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ath10k memory leak on 19.07 branch and mikrotik RB952Ui-5ac2nD?
On 12/6/19 7:02 PM, Ben Greear wrote: > On 12/6/19 9:44 AM, Joe Ayers wrote: >>> >>> Possibly the same symptoms don't exist on 128MB RAM devices. >>> >>> Like there is some if condition, which is doing some nasty things on 64M >>> devices? I admit, that I don't have ath10k-ct source code under my >>> pillow, but >>> it doesn't make much sense to me. >>> Comparable results between above and my 64MB device. However, if the sleep time is extended the consumption is more >>> >>> Ok, I'll let it run overnight with 120s sleep in between. >>> I suspect this is not the intended behavior. >>> >>> No its not and it's even strange, that I'm not seeing it here if it >>> should >>> happen in the "default setup". Maybe its because: >>> >>> 1. You're using custom image (I'm using official prebuilt images) >>> 2. You're not providing all the steps needed to reproduce the issue >>> 3. I've way different hardware >>> >>> Every detail could make huge difference. >>> >>> -- ynezz >> >> On the device I am testing, it is both (2GHz) ath9k and (5GHz) ath10k. >> These look to be related patches to this issue: >> >> 960-0010-ath10k-limit-htt-rx-ring-size.patch >> 960-0011-ath10k-limit-pci-buffer-size.patch >> >> In the v19.07.0-rc2 build for the rb-nor-flash-16M-ac ar71xx image, >> these patches are applied to backports-4.19.85-1, but don't seem to be >> applied to ath10k-ct-2019-09-09-5e8cd86f. Should ath10k-ct have >> these and other patches? The device's installed packages do include >> ath10k-ct (from downloads.openwrt.org installed image). > > I think that if you need the patches for upstream ath10k, then you > should also apply > the patches to ath10k-ct. > > Platforms with more memory probably do not need or benefit from those > patches. > > Thanks, > Ben > Hi, I am fine with adding these patches to ath10k-ct if they solve problems. It would be nice if a description could be added to the patches so I know what kind of buffers are reduced there. Will someone send a patch? Hauke signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ath10k memory leak on 19.07 branch and mikrotik RB952Ui-5ac2nD?
On 12/6/19 9:44 AM, Joe Ayers wrote: Possibly the same symptoms don't exist on 128MB RAM devices. Like there is some if condition, which is doing some nasty things on 64M devices? I admit, that I don't have ath10k-ct source code under my pillow, but it doesn't make much sense to me. Comparable results between above and my 64MB device. However, if the sleep time is extended the consumption is more Ok, I'll let it run overnight with 120s sleep in between. I suspect this is not the intended behavior. No its not and it's even strange, that I'm not seeing it here if it should happen in the "default setup". Maybe its because: 1. You're using custom image (I'm using official prebuilt images) 2. You're not providing all the steps needed to reproduce the issue 3. I've way different hardware Every detail could make huge difference. -- ynezz On the device I am testing, it is both (2GHz) ath9k and (5GHz) ath10k. These look to be related patches to this issue: 960-0010-ath10k-limit-htt-rx-ring-size.patch 960-0011-ath10k-limit-pci-buffer-size.patch In the v19.07.0-rc2 build for the rb-nor-flash-16M-ac ar71xx image, these patches are applied to backports-4.19.85-1, but don't seem to be applied to ath10k-ct-2019-09-09-5e8cd86f.Should ath10k-ct have these and other patches?The device's installed packages do include ath10k-ct (from downloads.openwrt.org installed image). I think that if you need the patches for upstream ath10k, then you should also apply the patches to ath10k-ct. Platforms with more memory probably do not need or benefit from those patches. Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ath10k memory leak on 19.07 branch and mikrotik RB952Ui-5ac2nD?
> > > > Possibly the same symptoms don't exist on 128MB RAM devices. > > Like there is some if condition, which is doing some nasty things on 64M > devices? I admit, that I don't have ath10k-ct source code under my pillow, but > it doesn't make much sense to me. > > > Comparable results between above and my 64MB device. However, if the > > sleep time is extended the consumption is more > > Ok, I'll let it run overnight with 120s sleep in between. > > > I suspect this is not the intended behavior. > > No its not and it's even strange, that I'm not seeing it here if it should > happen in the "default setup". Maybe its because: > > 1. You're using custom image (I'm using official prebuilt images) > 2. You're not providing all the steps needed to reproduce the issue > 3. I've way different hardware > > Every detail could make huge difference. > > -- ynezz On the device I am testing, it is both (2GHz) ath9k and (5GHz) ath10k. These look to be related patches to this issue: 960-0010-ath10k-limit-htt-rx-ring-size.patch 960-0011-ath10k-limit-pci-buffer-size.patch In the v19.07.0-rc2 build for the rb-nor-flash-16M-ac ar71xx image, these patches are applied to backports-4.19.85-1, but don't seem to be applied to ath10k-ct-2019-09-09-5e8cd86f.Should ath10k-ct have these and other patches?The device's installed packages do include ath10k-ct (from downloads.openwrt.org installed image). Joe AE6XE ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ath10k memory leak on 19.07 branch and mikrotik RB952Ui-5ac2nD?
Joe Ayers [2019-12-05 10:17:22]: > Possibly the same symptoms don't exist on 128MB RAM devices. Like there is some if condition, which is doing some nasty things on 64M devices? I admit, that I don't have ath10k-ct source code under my pillow, but it doesn't make much sense to me. > Comparable results between above and my 64MB device. However, if the > sleep time is extended the consumption is more Ok, I'll let it run overnight with 120s sleep in between. > I suspect this is not the intended behavior. No its not and it's even strange, that I'm not seeing it here if it should happen in the "default setup". Maybe its because: 1. You're using custom image (I'm using official prebuilt images) 2. You're not providing all the steps needed to reproduce the issue 3. I've way different hardware Every detail could make huge difference. -- ynezz ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ath10k memory leak on 19.07 branch and mikrotik RB952Ui-5ac2nD?
> I'm not able to reproduce it on TP-Link Archer C7 v5. > > > Attempting to use the hAP ac lite model RB952Ui-5ac2nD with the 5GHz > > radio0 802.11ac seems to be unstable and consume available memory. > > This is only enabling radio0 with no other changes and bringing wifi > > up/down to reproduce. Am I doing something silly, or should I submit > > a bug? > > uptime > /tmp/wifi.log && \ > cat /etc/openwrt_release >> /tmp/wifi.log && \ > uci set wireless.radio0.disabled=0 && \ > uci commit wireless && \ > wifi up && \ > echo "up: $(free | grep Mem:)" >> /tmp/wifi.log && \ > sleep 120 && \ > wifi down && sleep 1 && \ > echo "dn: $(free | grep Mem:)" >> /tmp/wifi.log && \ > for i in $(seq 1 10); do \ > wifi up; sleep 15; echo "up: $(free | grep Mem:)" >> /tmp/wifi.log; \ > wifi down; sleep 15; wifi down; sleep 1; wifi down; sleep 1; \ > wifi down; sleep 1; echo "dn: $(free | grep Mem:)" >> /tmp/wifi.log; \ > done; cat /tmp/wifi.log > > 14:06:05 up 2 min, load average: 0.24, 0.19, 0.08 > DISTRIB_ID='OpenWrt' > DISTRIB_RELEASE='19.07.0-rc2' > DISTRIB_REVISION='r10775-db8345d8e4' > DISTRIB_TARGET='ath79/generic' > DISTRIB_ARCH='mips_24kc' > DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION='OpenWrt 19.07.0-rc2 r10775-db8345d8e4' > DISTRIB_TAINTS='' > up: Mem: 124528 15128 99536 769864 > 80684 > dn: Mem: 124528 14860 99076 84 10592 > 80596 > up: Mem: 124528 22592 91340 84 10596 > 72872 > dn: Mem: 124528 14884 99048 84 10596 > 80580 > up: Mem: 124528 22848 91084 84 10596 > 72616 > dn: Mem: 124528 14884 99048 84 10596 > 80576 > up: Mem: 124528 22848 91084 84 10596 > 72612 > dn: Mem: 124528 14884 99048 84 10596 > 80576 > up: Mem: 124528 22848 91084 84 10596 > 72612 > dn: Mem: 124528 14884 99048 84 10596 > 80576 > up: Mem: 124528 22940 90992 84 10596 > 72520 > dn: Mem: 124528 14916 99016 84 10596 > 80544 > up: Mem: 124528 22808 91124 84 10596 > 72652 > dn: Mem: 124528 14868 99064 84 10596 > 80592 > up: Mem: 124528 22900 91032 84 10596 > 72560 > dn: Mem: 124528 14876 99056 84 10596 > 80584 > up: Mem: 124528 22676 91256 84 10596 > 72784 > dn: Mem: 124528 14904 99028 84 10596 > 80556 > up: Mem: 124528 22712 91220 84 10596 > 72748 > dn: Mem: 124528 14936 98996 84 10596 > 80524 > up: Mem: 124528 22708 91224 84 10596 > 72752 > dn: Mem: 124528 14936 98996 84 10596 > 80524 > > 15:53:35 up 1 min, load average: 1.35, 0.41, 0.14 > DISTRIB_ID='OpenWrt' > DISTRIB_RELEASE='19.07.0-rc2' > DISTRIB_REVISION='r10775-db8345d8e4' > DISTRIB_TARGET='ar71xx/generic' > DISTRIB_ARCH='mips_24kc' > DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION='OpenWrt 19.07.0-rc2 r10775-db8345d8e4' > DISTRIB_TAINTS='' > up: Mem: 124624 14068 100680 1209876 > 81760 > dn: Mem: 124624 14368 99524 140 10732 > 80996 > up: Mem: 124624 22072 91816 140 10736 > 73296 > dn: Mem: 124624 14360 99528 140 10736 > 81004 > up: Mem: 124624 22072 91816 140 10736 > 73292 > dn: Mem: 124624 14360 99528 140 10736 > 81004 > up: Mem: 124624 22068 91820 140 10736 > 73296 > dn: Mem: 124624 14360 99528 140 10736 > 81004 > up: Mem: 124624 22196 91692 140 10736 > 73168 > dn: Mem: 124624 14360 99528 140 10736 > 81004 > up: Mem: 124624 22356 91532 140 10736 > 73008 > dn: Mem: 124624 14392 99496 140 10736 > 80972 > up: Mem: 124624 22164 91724 140 10736 > 73200 > dn: Mem: 124624 14344 99544 140 10736 > 81020 > up: Mem: 124624 22956 90932 140 10736 > 72408 > dn: Mem: 124624 14352 99536 140 10736 > 81012 > up: Mem: 124624 22924 90964 140
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ath10k memory leak on 19.07 branch and mikrotik RB952Ui-5ac2nD?
Joe Ayers [2019-11-28 18:40:23]: Hi, I'm not able to reproduce it on TP-Link Archer C7 v5. > Attempting to use the hAP ac lite model RB952Ui-5ac2nD with the 5GHz > radio0 802.11ac seems to be unstable and consume available memory. > This is only enabling radio0 with no other changes and bringing wifi > up/down to reproduce. Am I doing something silly, or should I submit > a bug? uptime > /tmp/wifi.log && \ cat /etc/openwrt_release >> /tmp/wifi.log && \ uci set wireless.radio0.disabled=0 && \ uci commit wireless && \ wifi up && \ echo "up: $(free | grep Mem:)" >> /tmp/wifi.log && \ sleep 120 && \ wifi down && sleep 1 && \ echo "dn: $(free | grep Mem:)" >> /tmp/wifi.log && \ for i in $(seq 1 10); do \ wifi up; sleep 15; echo "up: $(free | grep Mem:)" >> /tmp/wifi.log; \ wifi down; sleep 15; wifi down; sleep 1; wifi down; sleep 1; \ wifi down; sleep 1; echo "dn: $(free | grep Mem:)" >> /tmp/wifi.log; \ done; cat /tmp/wifi.log 14:06:05 up 2 min, load average: 0.24, 0.19, 0.08 DISTRIB_ID='OpenWrt' DISTRIB_RELEASE='19.07.0-rc2' DISTRIB_REVISION='r10775-db8345d8e4' DISTRIB_TARGET='ath79/generic' DISTRIB_ARCH='mips_24kc' DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION='OpenWrt 19.07.0-rc2 r10775-db8345d8e4' DISTRIB_TAINTS='' up: Mem: 124528 15128 99536 769864 80684 dn: Mem: 124528 14860 99076 84 10592 80596 up: Mem: 124528 22592 91340 84 10596 72872 dn: Mem: 124528 14884 99048 84 10596 80580 up: Mem: 124528 22848 91084 84 10596 72616 dn: Mem: 124528 14884 99048 84 10596 80576 up: Mem: 124528 22848 91084 84 10596 72612 dn: Mem: 124528 14884 99048 84 10596 80576 up: Mem: 124528 22848 91084 84 10596 72612 dn: Mem: 124528 14884 99048 84 10596 80576 up: Mem: 124528 22940 90992 84 10596 72520 dn: Mem: 124528 14916 99016 84 10596 80544 up: Mem: 124528 22808 91124 84 10596 72652 dn: Mem: 124528 14868 99064 84 10596 80592 up: Mem: 124528 22900 91032 84 10596 72560 dn: Mem: 124528 14876 99056 84 10596 80584 up: Mem: 124528 22676 91256 84 10596 72784 dn: Mem: 124528 14904 99028 84 10596 80556 up: Mem: 124528 22712 91220 84 10596 72748 dn: Mem: 124528 14936 98996 84 10596 80524 up: Mem: 124528 22708 91224 84 10596 72752 dn: Mem: 124528 14936 98996 84 10596 80524 15:53:35 up 1 min, load average: 1.35, 0.41, 0.14 DISTRIB_ID='OpenWrt' DISTRIB_RELEASE='19.07.0-rc2' DISTRIB_REVISION='r10775-db8345d8e4' DISTRIB_TARGET='ar71xx/generic' DISTRIB_ARCH='mips_24kc' DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION='OpenWrt 19.07.0-rc2 r10775-db8345d8e4' DISTRIB_TAINTS='' up: Mem: 124624 14068 100680 1209876 81760 dn: Mem: 124624 14368 99524 140 10732 80996 up: Mem: 124624 22072 91816 140 10736 73296 dn: Mem: 124624 14360 99528 140 10736 81004 up: Mem: 124624 22072 91816 140 10736 73292 dn: Mem: 124624 14360 99528 140 10736 81004 up: Mem: 124624 22068 91820 140 10736 73296 dn: Mem: 124624 14360 99528 140 10736 81004 up: Mem: 124624 22196 91692 140 10736 73168 dn: Mem: 124624 14360 99528 140 10736 81004 up: Mem: 124624 22356 91532 140 10736 73008 dn: Mem: 124624 14392 99496 140 10736 80972 up: Mem: 124624 22164 91724 140 10736 73200 dn: Mem: 124624 14344 99544 140 10736 81020 up: Mem: 124624 22956 90932 140 10736 72408 dn: Mem: 124624 14352 99536 140 10736 81012 up: Mem: 124624 22924 90964 140 10736 72440 dn: Mem: 124624 14352 99536 140 10736 81012 up: Mem: 124624 22444 91444 140 10736
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ath10k memory leak on 19.07 branch and mikrotik RB952Ui-5ac2nD?
On 11/29/19 3:40 AM, Joe Ayers wrote: > Attempting to use the hAP ac lite model RB952Ui-5ac2nD with the 5GHz > radio0 802.11ac seems to be unstable and consume available memory. > This is only enabling radio0 with no other changes and bringing wifi > up/down to reproduce. Am I doing something silly, or should I submit > a bug? Sounds like the issue that this PR tried to work around: https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/1077 Kind regards, Matthias > > root@OpenWrt:/tmp# cat /etc/openwrt_release > DISTRIB_ID='OpenWrt' > DISTRIB_RELEASE='19.07-SNAPSHOT' > DISTRIB_REVISION='r10752-1859391e9e' > DISTRIB_TARGET='ar71xx/mikrotik' > DISTRIB_ARCH='mips_24kc' > DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION='OpenWrt 19.07-SNAPSHOT r10752-1859391e9e' > DISTRIB_TAINTS='no-all' > root@OpenWrt:/tmp# free > totalusedfree shared buff/cache > available > Mem: 59264 14104 332327804 11928 > 23352 > Swap: 0 0 0 > root@OpenWrt:/tmp# wifi up > 'radio1' is disabled > 'radio1' is disabled > root@OpenWrt:/tmp# free > totalusedfree shared buff/cache > available > Mem: 59264 19556 242047804 15504 > 16156 > Swap: 0 0 0 > root@OpenWrt:/tmp# date; free > Tue Nov 26 23:32:37 UTC 2019 > totalusedfree shared buff/cache > available > Mem: 59264 29768 139847804 15512 > 5944 > Swap: 0 0 0 > root@OpenWrt:/tmp# date; free > Tue Nov 26 23:32:55 UTC 2019 > totalusedfree shared buff/cache > available > Mem: 59264 33384 103687804 15512 > 2328 > Swap: 0 0 0 > root@OpenWrt:/tmp# date; free > Tue Nov 26 23:33:14 UTC 2019 > totalusedfree shared buff/cache > available > Mem: 59264 37424 104527804 11388 > 304 > Swap: 0 0 0 > root@OpenWrt:/tmp# wifi down > -ash: can't fork: Out of memory > root@OpenWrt:/tmp# wifi down > -ash: can't fork: Out of memory > root@OpenWrt:/tmp# wifi down > /sbin/wifi: line 188: can't fork: Out of memory > Failed to parse message data > 'radio1' is disabled > root@OpenWrt:/tmp# wifi down > Segmentation fault > Failed to parse message data > 'radio1' is disabled > root@OpenWrt:/tmp# free > totalusedfree shared buff/cache > available > Mem: 59264 3943685087804 11320 > 0 > Swap: 0 0 0 > root@OpenWrt:/tmp# wifi down > 'radio1' is disabled > root@OpenWrt:/tmp# date; free > Tue Nov 26 23:34:08 UTC 2019 > totalusedfree shared buff/cache > available > Mem: 59264 13716 339327804 11616 > 23892 > Swap: 0 0 0 > root@OpenWrt:/tmp# > > ___ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel > signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] ath10k memory leak on 19.07 branch and mikrotik RB952Ui-5ac2nD?
Attempting to use the hAP ac lite model RB952Ui-5ac2nD with the 5GHz radio0 802.11ac seems to be unstable and consume available memory. This is only enabling radio0 with no other changes and bringing wifi up/down to reproduce. Am I doing something silly, or should I submit a bug? root@OpenWrt:/tmp# cat /etc/openwrt_release DISTRIB_ID='OpenWrt' DISTRIB_RELEASE='19.07-SNAPSHOT' DISTRIB_REVISION='r10752-1859391e9e' DISTRIB_TARGET='ar71xx/mikrotik' DISTRIB_ARCH='mips_24kc' DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION='OpenWrt 19.07-SNAPSHOT r10752-1859391e9e' DISTRIB_TAINTS='no-all' root@OpenWrt:/tmp# free totalusedfree shared buff/cache available Mem: 59264 14104 332327804 11928 23352 Swap: 0 0 0 root@OpenWrt:/tmp# wifi up 'radio1' is disabled 'radio1' is disabled root@OpenWrt:/tmp# free totalusedfree shared buff/cache available Mem: 59264 19556 242047804 15504 16156 Swap: 0 0 0 root@OpenWrt:/tmp# date; free Tue Nov 26 23:32:37 UTC 2019 totalusedfree shared buff/cache available Mem: 59264 29768 139847804 155125944 Swap: 0 0 0 root@OpenWrt:/tmp# date; free Tue Nov 26 23:32:55 UTC 2019 totalusedfree shared buff/cache available Mem: 59264 33384 103687804 155122328 Swap: 0 0 0 root@OpenWrt:/tmp# date; free Tue Nov 26 23:33:14 UTC 2019 totalusedfree shared buff/cache available Mem: 59264 37424 104527804 11388 304 Swap: 0 0 0 root@OpenWrt:/tmp# wifi down -ash: can't fork: Out of memory root@OpenWrt:/tmp# wifi down -ash: can't fork: Out of memory root@OpenWrt:/tmp# wifi down /sbin/wifi: line 188: can't fork: Out of memory Failed to parse message data 'radio1' is disabled root@OpenWrt:/tmp# wifi down Segmentation fault Failed to parse message data 'radio1' is disabled root@OpenWrt:/tmp# free totalusedfree shared buff/cache available Mem: 59264 3943685087804 11320 0 Swap: 0 0 0 root@OpenWrt:/tmp# wifi down 'radio1' is disabled root@OpenWrt:/tmp# date; free Tue Nov 26 23:34:08 UTC 2019 totalusedfree shared buff/cache available Mem: 59264 13716 339327804 11616 23892 Swap: 0 0 0 root@OpenWrt:/tmp# ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
