Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Look for discussion topics this Thursday April 5th

[David McBride]

Thanks, Bin. Understood.

Perhaps we can schedule this topic for another week.

David

On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 9:32 PM HU, BIN  wrote:

> Since Cedric hasn’t confirmed yet, I will cancel the meeting tomorrow
> morning to save everyone’s time.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Bin
>
>
>
> *From:* David McBride [mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 04, 2018 4:11 PM
> *To:* HU, BIN 
> *Cc:* OLLIVIER Cédric IMT/OLN ;
> opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; ollivier cedric <
> ollivier.ced...@gmail.com>; Trevor Bramwell ;
> Tim Rozet ; Fatih Degirmenci <
> fatih.degirme...@ericsson.com>
>
>
> *Subject:* Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Look for discussion topics this
> Thursday April 5th
>
>
>
> Cedric - are you available for the tech discuss meeting on Thursday?
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 8:35 AM, HU, BIN  wrote:
>
> Cedric or David,
>
>
>
> Can you confirm that you will be able to present this topic tomorrow
> (13:00UTC Thursday April 5th) for further discussion?
>
>
>
> Thank you
>
> Bin
>
>
>
> *From:* HU, BIN
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 03, 2018 2:21 PM
> *To:* 'David McBride' 
> *Cc:* opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; OLLIVIER Cédric IMT/OLN <
> cedric.olliv...@orange.com>; ollivier cedric ;
> Trevor Bramwell ; Tim Rozet <
> tro...@redhat.com>; Fatih Degirmenci 
> *Subject:* RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Look for discussion topics this
> Thursday April 5th
>
>
>
> David,
>
>
>
> Thank you for bringing this topic.
>
>
>
> Cedric,
>
>
>
> Will you be able to bring this topic for further discussion this Thursday
> 13:00UTC / 6:00 PDT April 5th?
>
>
>
> Thank you
>
> Bin
>
>
>
> *From:* David McBride [mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org
> ]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 03, 2018 11:17 AM
> *To:* HU, BIN 
> *Cc:* opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; OLLIVIER Cédric IMT/OLN <
> cedric.olliv...@orange.com>; ollivier cedric ;
> Trevor Bramwell ; Tim Rozet <
> tro...@redhat.com>; Fatih Degirmenci 
> *Subject:* Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Look for discussion topics this
> Thursday April 5th
>
>
>
> Cedric brought up an interesting topic today in the release meeting that
> deserves further discussion.  Cedric says that in order to validate test
> gating for the CD pipeline, test frameworks need the ability to conduct
> self-test (functional) against a known-good DUT.  Currently, test
> frameworks are only able to run unit tests.  This imposes a significant
> burden on all CD pipelines.
>
>
>
> David
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 9:35 PM, HU, BIN  wrote:
>
> Hello community,
>
>
>
> We originally planned to discuss a new project proposal Capstone
> 
> by Jing Lu
> 
> in our weekly technical discussion this Thursday April 5th. The proposer
> requested to postpone the discussion to April 12th because of a holiday.
> Thus both Pharos 2.0 by Julien
> 
> and Capstone
> 
> by Jing Lu
> 
> will be rescheduled and discussed on April 12th.
>
>
>
> Please let me know if there are other topics on this Thursday April 5th.
> If no topics, I will cancel the meeting this week.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Bin
>
>
>
>
> ___
> opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
> opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
> 

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Canceled: Weekly Technical Discussion #114

[HU, BIN]

BEGIN:VCALENDAR
METHOD:CANCEL
PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010
VERSION:2.0
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Pacific Standard Time
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:16010101T02
TZOFFSETFROM:-0700
TZOFFSETTO:-0800
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=11
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:16010101T02
TZOFFSETFROM:-0800
TZOFFSETTO:-0700
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=2SU;BYMONTH=3
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
ORGANIZER;CN="HU, BIN":MAILTO:bh5...@att.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=opnfv-tech
 -disc...@lists.opnfv.org:MAILTO:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
ATTENDEE;ROLE=OPT-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN='Lawrence 
 Lamers':MAILTO:ljlam...@vmware.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=OPT-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN='Jose Ange
 l Lausuch':MAILTO:jalaus...@suse.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=OPT-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN="GUPTA, ALO
 K":MAILTO:ag1...@att.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=OPT-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN="Kedalagudd
 e, Meghashree Dattatri":MAILTO:meghashree.dattatri.kedalagu...@intel.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=OPT-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=Alan McNam
 ee:MAILTO:alan...@openet.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=OPT-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN="Alam, Taim
 oor":MAILTO:taimoor.a...@tum.de
ATTENDEE;ROLE=OPT-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=Piyush Sar
 wal:MAILTO:psar...@us.ibm.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=OPT-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=Stephen Te
 rrill:MAILTO:stephen.terr...@ericsson.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=OPT-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=Robert Dim
 ond:MAILTO:robert.dim...@arm.com
DESCRIPTION;LANGUAGE=en-US:https://zoom.us/j/2362828999\n+1-877-369-0926 or
  +1-855-880-1246 / Meeting ID: 236 282 8999\n\nHello community:\n\nThis is
  our 114th weekly technical discussion at 6am PDT / 9am EDT Thursday April
  5th\, 2018\, which is 13:00 UTC.\n\nWe will discuss a new project proposa
 l Capstone by
  Jing Lu. Pharos 2.0 by Julien will be discussed on April 12.\n
 \nYou can find your local time here http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/
 fixedtime.html?msg=OPNFV-Technical-Discussion=20180405T13=1.\n\nPle
 ase refer to https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/PROJ/Weekly+Technical+Discussi
 on for details of dialing logistics and tentative agenda.\n\nPlease let me
  know if you want to add anything to agenda for discussion in the communit
 y.\n\nFor your convenience:\n-   Zoom Meeting: https://zoom.us/j/23628
 28999\n-   You can also dial in using your phone:\no   United Stat
 es (Long distance): +1-669-900-6833 or +1 646 558 8656\no   United Sta
 tes (Toll Free): +1-877-369-0926 or +1-855-880-1246\no   Meeting ID: 2
 36 282 8999\no   International numbers available: https://zoom.us/zoom
 conference?m=Xn-Kas4jq2GuyfbCCKYpwvi6FpHEYX8n\n-   More information ab
 out OPNFV Conferencing Bridge:\n\nThanks\nBin\n\n
SUMMARY;LANGUAGE=en-US:Canceled: Weekly Technical Discussion #114
DTSTART;TZID=Pacific Standard Time:20180405T06
DTEND;TZID=Pacific Standard Time:20180405T07
UID:04008200E00074C5B7101A82E0085006D1978AC2D301000
 010009DB87A231178FF40AD2B348D3FC7AB91
CLASS:PUBLIC
PRIORITY:1
DTSTAMP:20180405T044130Z
TRANSP:OPAQUE
STATUS:CANCELLED
SEQUENCE:3
LOCATION;LANGUAGE=en-US:https://zoom.us/j/2362828999
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-APPT-SEQUENCE:3
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-OWNERAPPTID:1681340386
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-BUSYSTATUS:FREE
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-INTENDEDSTATUS:FREE
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-ALLDAYEVENT:FALSE
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-IMPORTANCE:2
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-INSTTYPE:0
X-MICROSOFT-DISALLOW-COUNTER:FALSE
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Cancelled - Weekly Technical Discussion on April 5

[HU, BIN]

Hello community,

Because both Pharos 2.0 by Julien 
and 
Capstone
 by Jing Lu will be rescheduled and 
discussed on April 12th and Cedric hasn't confirmed his availability for test 
discussion, there is no topic for discussion at our weekly technical discussion 
tomorrow April 5th.

Thus tomorrow's weekly technical discussion is cancelled.

We will resume our meeting on April 12th.

Thanks
Bin

From: HU, BIN
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2018 9:33 PM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Look for discussion topics this Thursday April 5th

Hello community,

We originally planned to discuss a new project proposal 
Capstone
 by Jing Lu in our weekly technical 
discussion this Thursday April 5th. The proposer requested to postpone the 
discussion to April 12th because of a holiday. Thus both Pharos 2.0 by 
Julien and 
Capstone
 by Jing Lu will be rescheduled and 
discussed on April 12th.

Please let me know if there are other topics on this Thursday April 5th. If no 
topics, I will cancel the meeting this week.

Thanks
Bin

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Look for discussion topics this Thursday April 5th

[HU, BIN]

Since Cedric hasn’t confirmed yet, I will cancel the meeting tomorrow morning 
to save everyone’s time.

Thanks
Bin

From: David McBride [mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2018 4:11 PM
To: HU, BIN 
Cc: OLLIVIER Cédric IMT/OLN ; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; ollivier cedric 
; Trevor Bramwell ; 
Tim Rozet ; Fatih Degirmenci 
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Look for discussion topics this Thursday 
April 5th

Cedric - are you available for the tech discuss meeting on Thursday?

On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 8:35 AM, HU, BIN > 
wrote:
Cedric or David,

Can you confirm that you will be able to present this topic tomorrow (13:00UTC 
Thursday April 5th) for further discussion?

Thank you
Bin

From: HU, BIN
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2018 2:21 PM
To: 'David McBride' 
>
Cc: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; 
OLLIVIER Cédric IMT/OLN 
>; ollivier 
cedric >; Trevor 
Bramwell >; 
Tim Rozet >; Fatih Degirmenci 
>
Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Look for discussion topics this Thursday 
April 5th

David,

Thank you for bringing this topic.

Cedric,

Will you be able to bring this topic for further discussion this Thursday 
13:00UTC / 6:00 PDT April 5th?

Thank you
Bin

From: David McBride [mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2018 11:17 AM
To: HU, BIN >
Cc: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; 
OLLIVIER Cédric IMT/OLN 
>; ollivier 
cedric >; Trevor 
Bramwell >; 
Tim Rozet >; Fatih Degirmenci 
>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Look for discussion topics this Thursday 
April 5th

Cedric brought up an interesting topic today in the release meeting that 
deserves further discussion.  Cedric says that in order to validate test gating 
for the CD pipeline, test frameworks need the ability to conduct self-test 
(functional) against a known-good DUT.  Currently, test frameworks are only 
able to run unit tests.  This imposes a significant burden on all CD pipelines.

David

On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 9:35 PM, HU, BIN > 
wrote:
Hello community,

We originally planned to discuss a new project proposal 
Capstone
 by Jing 
Lu
 in our weekly technical discussion this Thursday April 5th. The proposer 
requested to postpone the discussion to April 12th because of a holiday. Thus 
both Pharos 2.0 by 
Julien
 and 
Capstone
 by Jing 
Lu
 will be rescheduled and discussed on April 12th.

Please let me know if there are other topics on this Thursday April 5th. If no 
topics, I will cancel the meeting this week.

Thanks
Bin


___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Look for discussion topics this Thursday April 5th

[David McBride]

Cedric - are you available for the tech discuss meeting on Thursday?

On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 8:35 AM, HU, BIN  wrote:

> Cedric or David,
>
>
>
> Can you confirm that you will be able to present this topic tomorrow
> (13:00UTC Thursday April 5th) for further discussion?
>
>
>
> Thank you
>
> Bin
>
>
>
> *From:* HU, BIN
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 03, 2018 2:21 PM
> *To:* 'David McBride' 
> *Cc:* opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; OLLIVIER Cédric IMT/OLN <
> cedric.olliv...@orange.com>; ollivier cedric ;
> Trevor Bramwell ; Tim Rozet <
> tro...@redhat.com>; Fatih Degirmenci 
> *Subject:* RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Look for discussion topics this
> Thursday April 5th
>
>
>
> David,
>
>
>
> Thank you for bringing this topic.
>
>
>
> Cedric,
>
>
>
> Will you be able to bring this topic for further discussion this Thursday
> 13:00UTC / 6:00 PDT April 5th?
>
>
>
> Thank you
>
> Bin
>
>
>
> *From:* David McBride [mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org
> ]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 03, 2018 11:17 AM
> *To:* HU, BIN 
> *Cc:* opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; OLLIVIER Cédric IMT/OLN <
> cedric.olliv...@orange.com>; ollivier cedric ;
> Trevor Bramwell ; Tim Rozet <
> tro...@redhat.com>; Fatih Degirmenci 
> *Subject:* Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Look for discussion topics this
> Thursday April 5th
>
>
>
> Cedric brought up an interesting topic today in the release meeting that
> deserves further discussion.  Cedric says that in order to validate test
> gating for the CD pipeline, test frameworks need the ability to conduct
> self-test (functional) against a known-good DUT.  Currently, test
> frameworks are only able to run unit tests.  This imposes a significant
> burden on all CD pipelines.
>
>
>
> David
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 9:35 PM, HU, BIN  wrote:
>
> Hello community,
>
>
>
> We originally planned to discuss a new project proposal Capstone
> 
> by Jing Lu
> 
> in our weekly technical discussion this Thursday April 5th. The proposer
> requested to postpone the discussion to April 12th because of a holiday.
> Thus both Pharos 2.0 by Julien
> 
> and Capstone
> 
> by Jing Lu
> 
> will be rescheduled and discussed on April 12th.
>
>
>
> Please let me know if there are other topics on this Thursday April 5th.
> If no topics, I will cancel the meeting this week.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Bin
>
>
>
>
> ___
> opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
> opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
> 
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> *David McBride*
>
> Release Manager, OPNFV
>
> Mobile: +1.805.276.8018
>
> Email/Google Talk: dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org
>
> Skype: davidjmcbride1
>
> IRC: dmcbride
>



-- 
*David McBride*
Release Manager, OPNFV
Mobile: +1.805.276.8018
Email/Google Talk: dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org
Skype: davidjmcbride1
IRC: dmcbride
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [OPNFV Helpdesk #54009] [xci] Committer Promotions for releng-xci

[Trevor Bramwell via RT]

Hi Fatih, et al.,

I'm resolving this issue now that all the new committers have accepted their 
invites.

To those who let us know you didn't not receive the invites right away: thanks 
for letting us know, and thank you for your patience!

Regards,
Trevor Bramwell

On Thu Mar 29 16:42:18 2018, mb...@suse.com wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I did not get the invitation either.
> 
> Thanks,
> Manuel
> 
> On Sun, 2018-03-25 at 23:05 -0400, periyasamy.palanis...@ericsson.com
> via RT wrote:
> > Hi Aric,
> > 
> > Can you send me the invite again ?
> > I have somehow lost the email.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Periyasamy
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Aric Gardner via RT [mailto:opnfv-helpdesk@rt.linuxfoundation.o
> > rg] 
> > Sent: Friday, March 23, 2018 7:56 AM
> > To: Fatih Degirmenci 
> > Cc: david.blaisonn...@orange.com; mb...@suse.com; opnfv-tech-discuss@
> > lists.opnfv.org; opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org; Periyasamy Palanisamy  > riyasamy.palanis...@ericsson.com>; wutianw...@huawei.com
> > Subject: [OPNFV Helpdesk #54009] [xci] Committer Promotions for
> > releng-xci
> > 
> > Hi Fatih,
> > 
> > Invitations have been sent out.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Aric
> > 
> > 
> > On Fri Mar 23 10:13:34 2018, fatih.degirme...@ericsson.com wrote:
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > I would like to inform the TSC that Tianwei, Manuel, Periyasamy,
> > > and 
> > > David have been promoted as committers to XCI.
> > > You can see the nomination statements and the voting on Gerrit.
> > > 
> > > https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/q/status:merged+project:releng-
> > > xci+topic:xci-committer-promotion-skip-verify
> > > 
> > > I also want to take this opportunity to thank everyone for their 
> > > contributions, support, and interest into XCI. Without them, XCI 
> > > wouldn’t be where it is today.
> > > Much more and even better things are coming so please stay tuned.
> > > 
> > > Helpdesk,
> > > 
> > > Please grant committer rights to new XCI committers on Gerrit
> > > releng- 
> > > xci project.
> > > 
> > > /Fatih
> > > 
> > > From:  on behalf of
> > > Fatih 
> > > Degirmenci 
> > > Date: Wednesday, 21 March 2018 at 09:01
> > > To: "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org"  > > disc...@lists.opnfv.org>
> > > Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [xci] Committer Nominations for
> > > releng- 
> > > xci
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > As approved by TSC on 2017-12-12 [1], it is my pleasure to
> > > nominate 
> > > the XCI contributors listed below as committers to releng-xci
> > > Gerrit 
> > > project.
> > > XCI committers, please find the nomination statements on Gerrit 
> > > changes linked below and cast your vote; +1/-1, directly on Gerrit.
> > > 
> > > Tianwei Wu: https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/53885/
> > > Manuel Buil: https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/53887/
> > > Periyasamy Palanisamy: https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/53889/
> > > David Blaisonneau: https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/53891/
> > > 
> > > If the voting ends positively, I’ll inform the TSC regarding the 
> > > promotions and ask helpdesk to grant committer rights in releng-
> > > xci 
> > > Gerrit project to them.
> > > [1] http://meetbot.opnfv.org/meetings/opnfv-meeting/2017/opnfv-
> > > meeting.2017-12-12-14.01.html
> > > 
> > > /Fatih
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 



___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Guideline for participants //RE: Discussion about Fraser Plugfest/Plugtest from Testperf

[Yuyang (Gabriel)]

Hi Pierre,

Thanks a lot for all these information! I have subscribed your new email to the 
test-wg email list: https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/test-wg. I will 
send you the password in another mail.

I echo that it is a great idea to involve dovetail in ETSI Plugtest and we 
should start our pre-testing now.
From what I know, the release set and optional set (draft) of test cases of 
Dovetail has already included some tests from Funtest, Yarstick and Bottlenecks.
As to other test cases from our testing projects, we should also need the 
feedbacks before the weekend.
We could dicuss it at tomorrow's Testperf meeting.

Moreover, I could not find the registration link for ETSI plugtest. It is said 
on the website that the registration ends at March 31st.
Could you also help with that? Thanks a lot!


Best,
Gabriel


发件人： pierre.lynch
收件人： Yuyang 
(Gabriel)>
抄送： 
test-wg>;ross.b.brattain>;trevor.cooper>;acmorton>;georg.kunz>;tim.irnich>;ahothan>;mark.beierl>;cedric.olivier>
主题： Re: Guideline for participants //RE: Discussion about Fraser 
Plugfest/Plugtest from Testperf
时间： 2018-04-04 22:38:48

Hello all,

First: looks like I am not subscribed to the test-wg list, so my last email 
bounced back to me. I didn’t find it on the OPNFV mailing lists site….can 
someone please subscribe me to that? New email: 
pierre.ly...@keysight.com

I spoke with Silvia Almagia, the Plugtest organizer at ETSI.


  *   I told her about the plan to brainstorm in the community which scenarios 
(features) could be brought to the Plugtest. It will be like I described: each 
scenario would be listed as a separate platform for scheduling purposes.
  *   There is no formal process to insert test cases directly into the test 
plan. It’s done by suggesting and discussing it on the Plugtest email list, and 
then discussing it during the weekly meeting. There are people who will help to 
format it correctly, etc.
 *   In order to do this, you need to be registered to the Plugtest.
 *   The test case should involve interoperability. That’s the goal of the 
Plugtest, so it should involve the three functional blocks: Platform 
(NFVI+VIM), MANO and VNF(s)
 *   If it doesn’t meet the criteria above, it can still be done in a 
separate track
  *   Dovetail
 *   We can include a separate (optional) track to have Dovetail testing at 
the Plugtest. I can introduce it to the team at a weekly meeting, and then we 
can start planning it. This would likely involve finding out who of the 
platform vendors would like to attempt it

The most important point: time is getting critical. If a VPN connection to HIVE 
is necessary, it takes a bit of time. Plus there is pre-testing to be done 
between now and the Plugtest event itself. We really need to get moving with 
this.


Best Regards,

Pierre

***Please note the new email and phone number***
Pierre Lynch
Lead Technologist
Ixia Solutions Group
Keysight Technologies
M: +19193788248
pierre.ly...@keysight.com


From: Pierre Lynch 
Date: Wednesday, April 4, 2018 at 8:16 AM
To: "Yuyang (Gabriel)" 
Cc: "test...@lists.opnfv.org" , "Brattain, Ross B" 
, Trevor Cooper , "MORTON, 
ALFRED C (AL)" , Georg Kunz , Tim 
Irnich , "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" , 
"cedric.olliv...@orange.com" , 
"mark.bei...@emc.com" 
Subject: Re: Guideline for participants //RE: Discussion about Fraser 
Plugfest/Plugtest from Testperf

Sorry for not responding... I'm having a meeting with ETSI today to talk about 
this. I'll report back on this thread.
Thanks,

Pierre

On Apr 3, 2018, at 9:05 AM, Yuyang (Gabriel) 
> wrote:
Hi Pierre,

It was nice talking with you at ONS2018 about OPNFV testing projects 
participating ETSI plugtest.
I just want know that is there any guideline or link, so that we could choose 
to register our test cases/projects before the event?
I guess some of our projects may want to participate this time.

Thanks,
Gabriel

From: Yuyang (Gabriel)
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2018 3:44 PM
To: test...@lists.opnfv.org
Cc: Brattain, Ross B 

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] Agenda for VSPERF weekly meeting - 04 Apr 2018 (ww60)

[Rao, Sridhar]

Thanks for the participation,

Minutes can be found here:
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2018/opnfv-vswitchperf.2018-04-04-15.00.html

Regards,
Sridhar K. N. Rao (Ph. D)
Architect
+91-9900088064

From: Rao, Sridhar
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2018 8:01 AM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Cc: 'ALFRED C 'MORTON (AL)'' ; 'Trevor Cooper' 
; 'Mars Toktonaliev (Nokia - US/Irving)' 
; 'Cian Ferriter' ; Martin 
Klozik (martinx.klo...@intel.com) ; Christian 
Trautman (ctrau...@redhat.com) ; Bill Michalowski 
(bmich...@redhat.com) ; 'Elias, RichardX' 
; Alec Hothan (ahothan) ; 
eddie.arr...@huawei.com; Jose Angel Lausuch ; Julien 
Meunier 
Subject: [vsperf] Agenda for VSPERF weekly meeting - 04 Apr 2018 (ww60)


Agenda:

  1.  Development Updates - Stable Branch, Jira Modifications, etc.
  2.  ONS2018 Feedback
  3.  Introduction: Julien Meunier from 6Wind
  4.  Update on Martin Klozik.

Meeting minutes

  *   WW59 
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2018/opnfv-vswitchperf.2018-03-14-14.59.html
  *   WW58 
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2018/opnfv-vswitchperf.2018-03-07-15.57.html
  *   WW57 
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2018/opnfv-vswitchperf.2018-02-28-15.57.html


Time: Wednesday PDT 8h00 (GMT -7) UTC 15h00.

IRC: freenode https://freenode.net/ channel: #opnfv-vswitchperf 
http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=opnfv-vswitchperf

Audio: https://zoom.us/j/2362828999
Or iPhone one-tap :
US: +16699006833,,2362828999# or +16465588656,,2362828999#
Or Telephone:
Dial(for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location):
US: +1 669 900 6833 or +1 646 558 8656 or +1 877 369 0926 (Toll Free) or +1 855 
880 1246 (Toll Free)
Meeting ID: 236 282 8999
International numbers available: 
https://zoom.us/zoomconference?m=Xn-Kas4jq2GuyfbCCKYpwvi6FpHEYX8n

Regards,
Sridhar K. N. Rao (Ph. D)
Architect
+91-9900088064





Spirent Communications e-mail confidentiality.

This e-mail contains confidential and / or privileged information belonging to 
Spirent Communications plc, its affiliates and / or subsidiaries. If you are 
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, 
copying, distribution and / or the taking of any action based upon reliance on 
the contents of this transmission is strictly forbidden. If you have received 
this message in error please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete it 
from your system.

Spirent Communications plc
Northwood Park, Gatwick Road, Crawley, West Sussex, RH10 9XN, United Kingdom.
Tel No. +44 (0) 1293 767676
Fax No. +44 (0) 1293 767677

Registered in England Number 470893
Registered at Northwood Park, Gatwick Road, Crawley, West Sussex, RH10 9XN, 
United Kingdom.

Or if within the US,

Spirent Communications,
27349 Agoura Road, Calabasas, CA, 91301, USA.
Tel No. 1-818-676- 2300
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-tsc] Red-lined TSC Charter Document

[Raymond Paik]

Good catch Julien.  I used "organization" as TSC members could come from
research institutions, universities, etc. that are not (for profit)
companies.

Thanks,

Ray

On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 7:04 AM, Julien  wrote:

> Hi Ray,
>
> *"Cap per company:*
>
>- *Each organization can have a maximum of 2 TSC reps." in url: 
> **https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/DEV/Community+Election+Procedure
> *
>
>
> I would suggest using the same word for company and organization in this
> description, and maybe company here is better.
>
>
> BR,
> Julien
>
> Raymond Paik 于2018年4月4日周三 上午7:49写道：
>
>> Just update the wiki page incorporating Wenjing's feedback.  Take a look
>> at the TSC Chair election section at https://wiki.opnfv.org/
>> display/DEV/Community+Election+Procedure and let me know if there are
>> other questions/feedback.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Ray
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 1:50 PM, Raymond Paik 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Wenjing:
>>>
>>> Good points.  Yes, I'll go ahead and update the wiki in the next few
>>> days.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Ray
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 1:35 PM, Wenjing Chu 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 In the wiki page: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/DEV/Community+
 Election+Procedure:



 The TSC member election is scheduled on “mid-September” with
 flexibility, but the TSC chair wording is still hard-coded to September 7.
 I think that should be modified to be consistent – so that the newly
 elected TSC members choose the Chair, not the outgoing TSC.



 If that is indeed the intent here, which I assume so, then we should
 revise the wiki text as soon as possible.



 Another problem with the wiki section related to Chair election is its
 reference to the OPNFV By-Law

 ” (per section 5.5(b) of the OPNFV Bylaws
 )”.

 That is no longer valid. We should refer to the OPNFV Technical Charter
 (or LFN’s) instead.



 Regards

 Wenjing







 *From:* opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:
 opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] *On Behalf Of *Raymond Paik
 *Sent:* Wednesday, March 28, 2018 4:12 PM
 *To:* opnfv-tech-discuss ;
 opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org
 *Subject:* [opnfv-tech-discuss] Red-lined TSC Charter Document



 All,



 Please find attached red-lined TSC Charter document that reflects
 OPNFV's move to a merit-based TSC. The new text was heavily borrowed from 
 OpenDaylight's
 Charter
 
  as
 they already migrated to a merit-based TSC.  The details on size,
 eligibility, election timing, etc. will be updated on the wiki if/when
 community decides to make any tweaks.



 Please let me know if you have any questions/feedback.  The plan is to
 vote on this during the TSC meeting April 10th (after ~2 week review
 period).



 Thanks,



 Ray

>>>
>>>
>> ___
>> opnfv-tsc mailing list
>> opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org
>> https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tsc
>>
>
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

[opnfv-tech-discuss] SFC weekly MoMs

[Manuel Buil]

Hi,

Here are the MoMs for this week:

http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-sfc/2018/opnfv-sfc.
2018-04-04-14.03.html

Regards,
Manuel___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Look for discussion topics this Thursday April 5th

[HU, BIN]

Cedric or David,

Can you confirm that you will be able to present this topic tomorrow (13:00UTC 
Thursday April 5th) for further discussion?

Thank you
Bin

From: HU, BIN
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2018 2:21 PM
To: 'David McBride' 
Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; OLLIVIER Cédric IMT/OLN 
; ollivier cedric ; 
Trevor Bramwell ; Tim Rozet ; 
Fatih Degirmenci 
Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Look for discussion topics this Thursday 
April 5th

David,

Thank you for bringing this topic.

Cedric,

Will you be able to bring this topic for further discussion this Thursday 
13:00UTC / 6:00 PDT April 5th?

Thank you
Bin

From: David McBride [mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2018 11:17 AM
To: HU, BIN >
Cc: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; 
OLLIVIER Cédric IMT/OLN 
>; ollivier 
cedric >; Trevor 
Bramwell >; 
Tim Rozet >; Fatih Degirmenci 
>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Look for discussion topics this Thursday 
April 5th

Cedric brought up an interesting topic today in the release meeting that 
deserves further discussion.  Cedric says that in order to validate test gating 
for the CD pipeline, test frameworks need the ability to conduct self-test 
(functional) against a known-good DUT.  Currently, test frameworks are only 
able to run unit tests.  This imposes a significant burden on all CD pipelines.

David

On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 9:35 PM, HU, BIN > 
wrote:
Hello community,

We originally planned to discuss a new project proposal 
Capstone
 by Jing 
Lu
 in our weekly technical discussion this Thursday April 5th. The proposer 
requested to postpone the discussion to April 12th because of a holiday. Thus 
both Pharos 2.0 by 
Julien
 and 
Capstone
 by Jing 
Lu
 will be rescheduled and discussed on April 12th.

Please let me know if there are other topics on this Thursday April 5th. If no 
topics, I will cancel the meeting this week.

Thanks
Bin


___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss



--
David McBride
Release Manager, OPNFV
Mobile: +1.805.276.8018
Email/Google Talk: 
dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org
Skype: davidjmcbride1
IRC: dmcbride
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [testperf][yardstick][vsperf][nfvbench][TGaaS] Traffic generator as a service update

[MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)]

Adding Sridhar...

From: Foley, Emma L [mailto:emma.l.fo...@intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2018 4:44 AM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Cc: Alec Hothan (ahothan) ; MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) 
; Sinha, Abhijit ; Limingjiang (Rex) 
; pierre.ly...@keysight.com
Subject: [testperf][yardstick][vsperf][nfvbench][TGaaS] Traffic generator as a 
service update

Hi folks,

A few of us met last week at ONS, and continued the discussion on creating a 
common traffic generator library in OPNFV.
The summary is below, and on the etherpad [1], please update if there have been 
any omissions.

We decided to start with looking at trex drivers.
There are at least 5 similar drivers at the moment: NFVBench, yardstick, 
vsperf, Red Hat and FD.io.
Comparisons have been done between some trex drivers, and revealed ~25% 
difference in performance.
This is likely dues to differences in running the tests as well as different SW 
versions, as well as search algorithms for the NDR/PDR.

We need to converge on a common driver so that performance figures are not 
dependent on the test tools that is used.
There are slight difference in topology and test setup; each test should 
describe the current set-up for comparison.
We will compare a common test between all projects to get a baseline comparison 
before we start making any changes.
Because performance can vary between nodes, we will test on the same HW.

The plan of action is as follows:

-Find a POD

-An L2 forwarding test will be run by each participating project (order 
and participants to be determined later)

o   Some methodology and topology might need to be adjusted.

-Focus on common driver development to optimize the performance figures

-Re-run comparsions

We will also need to work on vsperf config parser (for yaml to Python) [2] so 
we can have consistent config formats for all portions of testing.

The initial participants in this comparison are:

-Vsperf

-NFVBench

-Yardstick

We will update weekly at the testperf meeting.

Best regards,
Emma

[1] 
https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/topics_for_TGAAS_discussion_at_plugfest
[2] 
https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/51757/


--
Intel Research and Development Ireland Limited
Registered in Ireland
Registered Office: Collinstown Industrial Park, Leixlip, County Kildare
Registered Number: 308263


___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] yardstick

[Beierl, Mark]

Hello,

Which version of StorPerf are you using?  You should be able to change the port 
for StorPerf HTTP Front End in the docker-compose.yaml file to a different 
port.  What is the error you are seeing, please?

Regards,
Mark

Mark Beierl
SW System Sr Principal Developer
Dell EMC | Cloud & Communication Service Provider Solution
mobile +1 613 314 8106
mark.bei...@dell.com

On Apr 4, 2018, at 03:04, Rawzan Masood 
> wrote:

We are trying to install StorPerf plugin to the yardstick environment  for 
storage testing , the storperf swagger uses port 5000  which is the default for 
storperf plugin . In the same time we are using Yardstick REST APIs which use 
the same port too (5000)
We tried to install storPerf plugin as docker on another port , but it didn't 
work
so , how we can install it on a specific port without facing conflicts which 
the REST APIs.
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

[opnfv-tech-discuss] yardstick

[Rawzan Masood]

 We are trying to install StorPerf plugin to the yardstick environment  for
storage testing , the storperf swagger uses port 5000  which is the default
for storperf plugin . In the same time we are using Yardstick REST APIs
which use the same port too (5000)
We tried to install storPerf plugin as docker on another port , but it
didn't work
so , how we can install it on a specific port without facing conflicts
which the REST APIs.
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [OPNFV-MANO] meeting #63 ONS-2018 and ONAP Breakout

[prakash RAMCHANDRAN via opnfv-tech-discuss]

Meeting Agenda & Summary - MANO Working Group - OPNFV Wiki


| 
| 
|  | 
Meeting Agenda & Summary - MANO Working Group - OPNFV Wiki


 |

 |

 |


Here is summary of todays meeting and you can go over slides on ONAP Breakout 
sessions and bring topics of intrest to present and any progress you have seen 
on post ONS folowup.
ThanksPrakash
#opnfv-mano: mano-wg

Meeting started by pramchan at 14:04:49 UTC.  The full logs are
available at
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-mano/2018/opnfv-mano.2018-04-04-14.04.log.html
.

Meeting summary
---

* pramchan  (pramchan, 14:05:02)

* LINK: https://wiki.opnfv.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=6827111
  (pramchan, 14:14:24)
* ons-2018  (pramchan, 14:14:52)
  * ONAP DevOps presentaions were at the ONS-2018 on March 26-27 and
details are available on the ONAP site  (pramchan, 14:23:25)
  * LINK:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLbzoR-pLrL6qRtjoA5vHbU2YDma56KNG9
(pramchan, 14:24:55)
  * LINK: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/PROJ/Edge+cloud  (pramchan,
14:34:13)
  * LINK: https://github.com/openci/landscape  (pramchan, 14:40:12)
  * LINK: This has all slides from ONAP Breakout sessions at ONS-2018
https://wiki.lfnetworking.org/display/LN/ONAP+Project+Specific+Breakout
(pramchan, 14:45:05)



Meeting ended at 14:50:18 UTC.
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-tsc] Red-lined TSC Charter Document

[Julien]

Hi Ray,

*"Cap per company:*

   - *Each organization can have a maximum of 2 TSC reps." in url:
**https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/DEV/Community+Election+Procedure
    *


I would suggest using the same word for company and organization in this
description, and maybe company here is better.


BR,
Julien

Raymond Paik 于2018年4月4日周三 上午7:49写道：

> Just update the wiki page incorporating Wenjing's feedback.  Take a look
> at the TSC Chair election section at
> https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/DEV/Community+Election+Procedure and let
> me know if there are other questions/feedback.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ray
>
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 1:50 PM, Raymond Paik 
> wrote:
>
>> Wenjing:
>>
>> Good points.  Yes, I'll go ahead and update the wiki in the next few days.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Ray
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 1:35 PM, Wenjing Chu 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> In the wiki page:
>>> https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/DEV/Community+Election+Procedure:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The TSC member election is scheduled on “mid-September” with
>>> flexibility, but the TSC chair wording is still hard-coded to September 7.
>>> I think that should be modified to be consistent – so that the newly
>>> elected TSC members choose the Chair, not the outgoing TSC.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> If that is indeed the intent here, which I assume so, then we should
>>> revise the wiki text as soon as possible.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Another problem with the wiki section related to Chair election is its
>>> reference to the OPNFV By-Law
>>>
>>> ” (per section 5.5(b) of the OPNFV Bylaws
>>> )”.
>>>
>>> That is no longer valid. We should refer to the OPNFV Technical Charter
>>> (or LFN’s) instead.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Wenjing
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:
>>> opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] *On Behalf Of *Raymond Paik
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 28, 2018 4:12 PM
>>> *To:* opnfv-tech-discuss ;
>>> opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org
>>> *Subject:* [opnfv-tech-discuss] Red-lined TSC Charter Document
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Please find attached red-lined TSC Charter document that reflects
>>> OPNFV's move to a merit-based TSC. The new text was heavily borrowed from 
>>> OpenDaylight's
>>> Charter
>>> 
>>>  as
>>> they already migrated to a merit-based TSC.  The details on size,
>>> eligibility, election timing, etc. will be updated on the wiki if/when
>>> community decides to make any tweaks.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Please let me know if you have any questions/feedback.  The plan is to
>>> vote on this during the TSC meeting April 10th (after ~2 week review
>>> period).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Ray
>>>
>>
>>
> ___
> opnfv-tsc mailing list
> opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org
> https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tsc
>
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [testperf][yardstick][vsperf][nfvbench][TGaaS] Traffic generator as a service update

[Foley, Emma L]

Hi folks,

A few of us met last week at ONS, and continued the discussion on creating a 
common traffic generator library in OPNFV.
The summary is below, and on the etherpad [1], please update if there have been 
any omissions.

We decided to start with looking at trex drivers.
There are at least 5 similar drivers at the moment: NFVBench, yardstick, 
vsperf, Red Hat and FD.io.
Comparisons have been done between some trex drivers, and revealed ~25% 
difference in performance.
This is likely dues to differences in running the tests as well as different SW 
versions, as well as search algorithms for the NDR/PDR.
We need to converge on a common driver so that performance figures are not 
dependent on the test tools that is used.
There are slight difference in topology and test setup; each test should 
describe the current set-up for comparison.
We will compare a common test between all projects to get a baseline comparison 
before we start making any changes.
Because performance can vary between nodes, we will test on the same HW.

The plan of action is as follows:

-Find a POD

-An L2 forwarding test will be run by each participating project (order 
and participants to be determined later)

o   Some methodology and topology might need to be adjusted.

-Focus on common driver development to optimize the performance figures

-Re-run comparsions

We will also need to work on vsperf config parser (for yaml to Python) [2] so 
we can have consistent config formats for all portions of testing.

The initial participants in this comparison are:

-Vsperf

-NFVBench

-Yardstick

We will update weekly at the testperf meeting.

Best regards,
Emma

[1] https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/topics_for_TGAAS_discussion_at_plugfest
[2] https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/51757/


--
Intel Research and Development Ireland Limited
Registered in Ireland
Registered Office: Collinstown Industrial Park, Leixlip, County Kildare
Registered Number: 308263


___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [test-wg] Reporting Fraser Release Adaption

[Chenjiankun (JackChan)]

Hi,

 I have updated the reporting page for Fraser on the server. See:
   http://testresults.opnfv.org/reporting/index.html
 (Functest, Yardstick, Qtip is ready now, Storperf and Vsperf seems not 
follow the OPNFV Release)
 (Also the Fraser Icon need to be updated)

 I also have upload a patch, see:
   https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/54881/

 For now, there is no data in the database, so the pages are still 
empty page. Once we upload test results, each pages will show the result.


BRs,
Jack Chan
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] LDT breakout session summary //Re: ONS Discussion //RE: NFVbench requirements //RE: check xci pike tags //RE: Update on long duration test

[Tallgren, Tapio (Nokia - FI/Espoo)]

Hi,

Our system is using VXLAN, will TRex work with that?

-Tapio


From: Alec Hothan (ahothan) 
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2018 7:13:24 PM
To: Tallgren, Tapio (Nokia - FI/Espoo); Yuyang (Gabriel); 'Fatih Degirmenci'; 
'cedric.olliv...@orange.com'; 'Tim Irnich'; 'BLAISONNEAU David IMT/OLN'; 
'sridhar@spirent.com'; 'ross.b.bratt...@intel.com'; 'mark.bei...@emc.com'; 
'Jose Lausuch'; 'Georg Kunz'
Cc: 'trevor.coo...@intel.com'; Kosonen, Juha (Nokia - FI/Espoo); 
'acmor...@att.com'; Wangwulin (Linda); 'rp...@linuxfoundation.org'; 
'opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org'; 'test...@lists.opnfv.org'
Subject: Re: LDT breakout session summary //Re: ONS Discussion //RE: NFVbench 
requirements //RE: check xci pike tags //RE: Update on long duration test


Hi Tapio,

We routinely use Trex with a switch so should not be a problem.
The wiki page mentions that the jump host has 4x10G ports, how many of those 
ports are used?
TRex will need 2 unused ports and the corresponding ports on the switch need to 
be configured in trunk mode and with proper VLAN range (i.e. it has to match 
the VLAN range used by the deployer for the tenant or provider network n- this 
should normally be the same configuration as the ports that connect to all 
compute node provider network).

Thanks

  Alec



From: "Tallgren, Tapio (Nokia - FI/Espoo)" 
Date: Thursday, March 29, 2018 at 10:42 AM
To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" , "Yuyang (Gabriel)" 
, 'Fatih Degirmenci' 
, "'cedric.olliv...@orange.com'" 
, 'Tim Irnich' , 
'BLAISONNEAU David IMT/OLN' , 
"'sridhar@spirent.com'" , 
"'ross.b.bratt...@intel.com'" , 
"'mark.bei...@emc.com'" , 'Jose Lausuch' 
, 'Georg Kunz' 
Cc: "'trevor.coo...@intel.com'" , "Kosonen, Juha 
(Nokia - FI/Espoo)" , "'acmor...@att.com'" 
, "Wangwulin (Linda)" , 
"'rp...@linuxfoundation.org'" , 
"'opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org'" , 
"'test...@lists.opnfv.org'" 
Subject: Re: LDT breakout session summary //Re: ONS Discussion //RE: NFVbench 
requirements //RE: check xci pike tags //RE: Update on long duration test

Hi,

The Nokia lab architecture is on 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/pharos/Nokia+Hosting.

You can run TRex on the jump host unless you want to do some custom 
installation. The NICs are standard Intel 82599's aka Niantics, so dpdk should 
just work.

I do not know how TRex works but I have had some difficulties with Moongen with 
the ToR switches. Moongen uses timing packets and these do not go cleanly 
through the ToRs, but everything works with a direct connection. Let me know if 
you need something unusual.

-Tapio


From: Alec Hothan (ahothan) >
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2018 12:25:00 AM
To: Yuyang (Gabriel); 'Fatih Degirmenci'; 
'cedric.olliv...@orange.com'; Tallgren, 
Tapio (Nokia - FI/Espoo); 'Tim Irnich'; 'BLAISONNEAU David IMT/OLN'; 
'sridhar@spirent.com'; 
'ross.b.bratt...@intel.com'; 
'mark.bei...@emc.com'; 'Jose Lausuch'; 'Georg Kunz'
Cc: 'trevor.coo...@intel.com'; Kosonen, Juha 
(Nokia - FI/Espoo); 'acmor...@att.com'; Wangwulin 
(Linda); 'rp...@linuxfoundation.org'; 
'opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org';
 'test...@lists.opnfv.org'
Subject: Re: LDT breakout session summary //Re: ONS Discussion //RE: NFVbench 
requirements //RE: check xci pike tags //RE: Update on long duration test


Just want to add the ETA for getting bare metal installation automated by 
script would have to be before this summer – which is not that far away (3 
months).
To avoid any last minute surprise and further delay, it would be great if Tapio 
could identify which jump host to use to run Trex and whether/when it will have 
the proper NIC by then. Also note that we should be able to verify the proper 
connectivity from TRex to the TOR and back without requiring a bare metal 
openstack installation.
Once we get Trex operational, we will be able to run any test that relies on 
Trex.

Thanks

   Alec



From: "Yuyang (Gabriel)" 
>
Date: Tuesday, March 27, 2018 at 7:07 PM
To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" >, 
'Fatih Degirmenci' 

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] Farewell

[Klozik, MartinX]

Dear VSPERFers,

let me inform you, that both Richard and me will be transferred to a different 
project starting from May. It means that we won't be able to actively 
participate on VSPERF development anymore.

I would like to thank you for a very friendly atmosphere within VSPERF 
community. It was a pleasure to work with you.

Best Regards,
Martin & Richard

--
Intel Research and Development Ireland Limited
Registered in Ireland
Registered Office: Collinstown Industrial Park, Leixlip, County Kildare
Registered Number: 308263


This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole
use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is
strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
sender and delete all copies.
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss