Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Weekly call agenda 9/29

[Georg Kunz]

Hi Wenjing,

Yes, I can give a brief update.

Cheers
Georg

From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Wenjing Chu
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2017 9:22 PM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Weekly call agenda 9/29

Hi Dovetailers


  *   For this week, we have a singular focus to review preparations and to 
start beta, including 0.7.0 (beta) release, web portal, all relevant docs, and 
support mechanism.
  *   Next week we may be impacted by China's holidays - let's see if we need 
to cancel the call and if any alternative support is needed.
  *   If time permit, Georg, can you update if we are ready to finalize on doc 
publication plan?
Thanks.

Regards

Wenjing Chu
Sr. Director, Open Source and Research
Futurewei Technologies, Inc.
(m) +1 (408) 203-2657

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

[SerenaFeng(zte)]

Hi,

FYI, I added ZTE to the table as offering an OPNFV distro POD for the beta
trial.

BR
Serena

On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 8:42 AM Tianhongbo <hongbo.tianhon...@huawei.com>
wrote:

> Thanks
>
>
>
> Hongbo
>
>
>
> *From:* opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:
> opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] *On Behalf Of *Cooper, Trevor
> *Sent:* 2017年8月18日 7:29
> *To:* Wenjing Chu <wenjing@huawei.com>; Lincoln Lavoie <
> lylav...@iol.unh.edu>
>
>
> *Cc:* opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> *Subject:* Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11
>
>
>
> Done https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/dovetail/Dovetail+Beta
>
>
>
> Trevor
>
>
>
> *From:* Wenjing Chu [mailto:wenjing@huawei.com
> <wenjing@huawei.com>]
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 9:53 AM
> *To:* Lincoln Lavoie <lylav...@iol.unh.edu>
> *Cc:* Cooper, Trevor <trevor.coo...@intel.com>; SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN
> L) <bryan.sulli...@research.att.com>; Dave Urschatz <
> dave.ursch...@cengn.ca>; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> *Subject:* RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11
>
>
>
> Very well said. Let me amend it. Thanks.
>
>
>
> Wenjing
>
>
>
> *From:* Lincoln Lavoie [mailto:lylav...@iol.unh.edu <lylav...@iol.unh.edu>]
>
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 5:31 AM
> *To:* Wenjing Chu <wenjing@huawei.com>
> *Cc:* Cooper, Trevor <trevor.coo...@intel.com>; SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN
> L) <bryan.sulli...@research.att.com>; Dave Urschatz <
> dave.ursch...@cengn.ca>; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> *Subject:* Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11
>
>
>
> It's not suppose to be "only bugs from beta testers," but beta testers are
> expected to be the primary source of bug reports.  During the beta period,
> no new tests or features would be added, only bug fixes.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
> Lincoln
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 2:25 AM, Wenjing Chu <wenjing@huawei.com>
> wrote:
>
> Trevor & Bryan,
>
>
>
> Thanks for the interest in participating in Beta. It’s great to see the
> leaders stepping up.
>
>
>
> I think the quoted line meant to say that bugs encountered in beta have
> priority and the immediate attention, esp. if/when we have to choose.
> Another point is that during beta we have interests in stability as well,
> fixing non-critical bugs already known before the beta may cause more harm
> than good. That’s how I understood it as a developer.
>
>
>
> Lincoln, do you like to add comment as it’s from one of your suggestions?
>
>
>
> We can discuss & rephrase it as appropriate.
>
>
>
> Wenjing
>
>
>
> *From:* Cooper, Trevor [mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 16, 2017 7:01 PM
> *To:* SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) <bryan.sulli...@research.att.com>;
> Wenjing Chu <wenjing@huawei.com>; Dave Urschatz <
> dave.ursch...@cengn.ca>; Lincoln Lavoie <lylav...@iol.unh.edu>
> *Cc:* opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
>
>
> *Subject:* RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11
>
>
>
> I added Intel to the table as offering a Pharos POD for the beta trial.
>
>
>
> “Only bugs submitted by the beta testers will be reviewed and accepted
> during Beta” … why would we only fix bugs reported by beta testers? ALL
> reported bugs should be investigated and prioritized.
>
>
>
> /Trevor
>
>
>
> *From:* opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [
> mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
> <opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>] *On Behalf Of *SULLIVAN,
> BRYAN L (BRYAN L)
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 16, 2017 10:14 AM
> *To:* Wenjing Chu <wenjing@huawei.com>; Dave Urschatz <
> dave.ursch...@cengn.ca>; Lincoln Lavoie <lylav...@iol.unh.edu>
> *Cc:* opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> *Subject:* Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11
>
>
>
> I added the table for beta participants.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bryan Sullivan | AT
>
>
>
> *From:* Wenjing Chu [mailto:wenjing@huawei.com
> <wenjing@huawei.com>]
> *Sent:* Monday, August 14, 2017 10:44 PM
> *To:* Dave Urschatz <dave.ursch...@cengn.ca>; Lincoln Lavoie <
> lylav...@iol.unh.edu>; SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) <
> bryan.sulli...@research.att.com>
> *Cc:* opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> *Subject:* RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11
>
>
>
> Here is the Beta test page:
> https:

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

[Tianhongbo]

Thanks

Hongbo

From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Cooper, Trevor
Sent: 2017年8月18日 7:29
To: Wenjing Chu <wenjing@huawei.com>; Lincoln Lavoie <lylav...@iol.unh.edu>
Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

Done https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/dovetail/Dovetail+Beta

Trevor

From: Wenjing Chu [mailto:wenjing@huawei.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2017 9:53 AM
To: Lincoln Lavoie <lylav...@iol.unh.edu<mailto:lylav...@iol.unh.edu>>
Cc: Cooper, Trevor <trevor.coo...@intel.com<mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com>>; 
SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) 
<bryan.sulli...@research.att.com<mailto:bryan.sulli...@research.att.com>>; Dave 
Urschatz <dave.ursch...@cengn.ca<mailto:dave.ursch...@cengn.ca>>; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

Very well said. Let me amend it. Thanks.

Wenjing

From: Lincoln Lavoie [mailto:lylav...@iol.unh.edu]
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2017 5:31 AM
To: Wenjing Chu <wenjing@huawei.com<mailto:wenjing@huawei.com>>
Cc: Cooper, Trevor <trevor.coo...@intel.com<mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com>>; 
SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) 
<bryan.sulli...@research.att.com<mailto:bryan.sulli...@research.att.com>>; Dave 
Urschatz <dave.ursch...@cengn.ca<mailto:dave.ursch...@cengn.ca>>; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

It's not suppose to be "only bugs from beta testers," but beta testers are 
expected to be the primary source of bug reports.  During the beta period, no 
new tests or features would be added, only bug fixes.

Cheers,
Lincoln

On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 2:25 AM, Wenjing Chu 
<wenjing@huawei.com<mailto:wenjing@huawei.com>> wrote:
Trevor & Bryan,

Thanks for the interest in participating in Beta. It’s great to see the leaders 
stepping up.

I think the quoted line meant to say that bugs encountered in beta have 
priority and the immediate attention, esp. if/when we have to choose. Another 
point is that during beta we have interests in stability as well, fixing 
non-critical bugs already known before the beta may cause more harm than good. 
That’s how I understood it as a developer.

Lincoln, do you like to add comment as it’s from one of your suggestions?

We can discuss & rephrase it as appropriate.

Wenjing

From: Cooper, Trevor 
[mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com<mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com>]
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2017 7:01 PM
To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) 
<bryan.sulli...@research.att.com<mailto:bryan.sulli...@research.att.com>>; 
Wenjing Chu <wenjing@huawei.com<mailto:wenjing@huawei.com>>; Dave 
Urschatz <dave.ursch...@cengn.ca<mailto:dave.ursch...@cengn.ca>>; Lincoln 
Lavoie <lylav...@iol.unh.edu<mailto:lylav...@iol.unh.edu>>
Cc: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>

Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

I added Intel to the table as offering a Pharos POD for the beta trial.

“Only bugs submitted by the beta testers will be reviewed and accepted during 
Beta” … why would we only fix bugs reported by beta testers? ALL reported bugs 
should be investigated and prioritized.

/Trevor

From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>
 [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of SULLIVAN, 
BRYAN L (BRYAN L)
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2017 10:14 AM
To: Wenjing Chu <wenjing@huawei.com<mailto:wenjing@huawei.com>>; Dave 
Urschatz <dave.ursch...@cengn.ca<mailto:dave.ursch...@cengn.ca>>; Lincoln 
Lavoie <lylav...@iol.unh.edu<mailto:lylav...@iol.unh.edu>>
Cc: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

I added the table for beta participants.

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | AT

From: Wenjing Chu [mailto:wenjing@huawei.com]
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 10:44 PM
To: Dave Urschatz <dave.ursch...@cengn.ca<mailto:dave.ursch...@cengn.ca>>; 
Lincoln Lavoie <lylav...@iol.unh.edu<mailto:lylav...@iol.unh.edu>>; SULLIVAN, 
BRYAN L (BRYAN L) 
<bryan.sulli...@research.att.com<mailto:bryan.sulli...@research.att.com>>
Cc: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

Here is the Beta test page: 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/dovetail/Dovetail+Beta<https://urldefense.proofpoint

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

[Cooper, Trevor]

Done https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/dovetail/Dovetail+Beta

Trevor

From: Wenjing Chu [mailto:wenjing@huawei.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2017 9:53 AM
To: Lincoln Lavoie <lylav...@iol.unh.edu>
Cc: Cooper, Trevor <trevor.coo...@intel.com>; SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) 
<bryan.sulli...@research.att.com>; Dave Urschatz <dave.ursch...@cengn.ca>; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

Very well said. Let me amend it. Thanks.

Wenjing

From: Lincoln Lavoie [mailto:lylav...@iol.unh.edu]
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2017 5:31 AM
To: Wenjing Chu <wenjing@huawei.com<mailto:wenjing@huawei.com>>
Cc: Cooper, Trevor <trevor.coo...@intel.com<mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com>>; 
SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) 
<bryan.sulli...@research.att.com<mailto:bryan.sulli...@research.att.com>>; Dave 
Urschatz <dave.ursch...@cengn.ca<mailto:dave.ursch...@cengn.ca>>; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

It's not suppose to be "only bugs from beta testers," but beta testers are 
expected to be the primary source of bug reports.  During the beta period, no 
new tests or features would be added, only bug fixes.

Cheers,
Lincoln

On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 2:25 AM, Wenjing Chu 
<wenjing@huawei.com<mailto:wenjing@huawei.com>> wrote:
Trevor & Bryan,

Thanks for the interest in participating in Beta. It’s great to see the leaders 
stepping up.

I think the quoted line meant to say that bugs encountered in beta have 
priority and the immediate attention, esp. if/when we have to choose. Another 
point is that during beta we have interests in stability as well, fixing 
non-critical bugs already known before the beta may cause more harm than good. 
That’s how I understood it as a developer.

Lincoln, do you like to add comment as it’s from one of your suggestions?

We can discuss & rephrase it as appropriate.

Wenjing

From: Cooper, Trevor 
[mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com<mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com>]
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2017 7:01 PM
To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) 
<bryan.sulli...@research.att.com<mailto:bryan.sulli...@research.att.com>>; 
Wenjing Chu <wenjing@huawei.com<mailto:wenjing@huawei.com>>; Dave 
Urschatz <dave.ursch...@cengn.ca<mailto:dave.ursch...@cengn.ca>>; Lincoln 
Lavoie <lylav...@iol.unh.edu<mailto:lylav...@iol.unh.edu>>
Cc: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>

Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

I added Intel to the table as offering a Pharos POD for the beta trial.

“Only bugs submitted by the beta testers will be reviewed and accepted during 
Beta” … why would we only fix bugs reported by beta testers? ALL reported bugs 
should be investigated and prioritized.

/Trevor

From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>
 [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of SULLIVAN, 
BRYAN L (BRYAN L)
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2017 10:14 AM
To: Wenjing Chu <wenjing@huawei.com<mailto:wenjing@huawei.com>>; Dave 
Urschatz <dave.ursch...@cengn.ca<mailto:dave.ursch...@cengn.ca>>; Lincoln 
Lavoie <lylav...@iol.unh.edu<mailto:lylav...@iol.unh.edu>>
Cc: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

I added the table for beta participants.

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | AT

From: Wenjing Chu [mailto:wenjing@huawei.com]
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 10:44 PM
To: Dave Urschatz <dave.ursch...@cengn.ca<mailto:dave.ursch...@cengn.ca>>; 
Lincoln Lavoie <lylav...@iol.unh.edu<mailto:lylav...@iol.unh.edu>>; SULLIVAN, 
BRYAN L (BRYAN L) 
<bryan.sulli...@research.att.com<mailto:bryan.sulli...@research.att.com>>
Cc: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

Here is the Beta test page: 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/dovetail/Dovetail+Beta<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_display_dovetail_Dovetail-2BBeta=DwMGaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=ML-JPRZQOfToJjMwlJLPlcWimAEwMA5DZGNIrk-cgy0=v9curOpTMUn7PlLbVHRqXlFJZJ275Ip0Q09llzCX4dI=0kagZLID-U737LKkt3XcjnqiEd5jSAxLtDcRofH-Yys=>
I think I summarized most of the comments I received so far. Please let me know 
if I missed anything. Additional comments welcome and we’ll discuss in this 
week’s call.
Again, thanks Bryan and Lincoln for your suggestions.

Dave,
On your first two points, please refer to the above wiki page.
For the third point, yes, current 

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

[Wenjing Chu]

Very well said. Let me amend it. Thanks.

Wenjing

From: Lincoln Lavoie [mailto:lylav...@iol.unh.edu]
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2017 5:31 AM
To: Wenjing Chu <wenjing@huawei.com>
Cc: Cooper, Trevor <trevor.coo...@intel.com>; SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) 
<bryan.sulli...@research.att.com>; Dave Urschatz <dave.ursch...@cengn.ca>; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

It's not suppose to be "only bugs from beta testers," but beta testers are 
expected to be the primary source of bug reports.  During the beta period, no 
new tests or features would be added, only bug fixes.

Cheers,
Lincoln

On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 2:25 AM, Wenjing Chu 
<wenjing@huawei.com<mailto:wenjing@huawei.com>> wrote:
Trevor & Bryan,

Thanks for the interest in participating in Beta. It’s great to see the leaders 
stepping up.

I think the quoted line meant to say that bugs encountered in beta have 
priority and the immediate attention, esp. if/when we have to choose. Another 
point is that during beta we have interests in stability as well, fixing 
non-critical bugs already known before the beta may cause more harm than good. 
That’s how I understood it as a developer.

Lincoln, do you like to add comment as it’s from one of your suggestions?

We can discuss & rephrase it as appropriate.

Wenjing

From: Cooper, Trevor 
[mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com<mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com>]
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2017 7:01 PM
To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) 
<bryan.sulli...@research.att.com<mailto:bryan.sulli...@research.att.com>>; 
Wenjing Chu <wenjing@huawei.com<mailto:wenjing@huawei.com>>; Dave 
Urschatz <dave.ursch...@cengn.ca<mailto:dave.ursch...@cengn.ca>>; Lincoln 
Lavoie <lylav...@iol.unh.edu<mailto:lylav...@iol.unh.edu>>
Cc: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>

Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

I added Intel to the table as offering a Pharos POD for the beta trial.

“Only bugs submitted by the beta testers will be reviewed and accepted during 
Beta” … why would we only fix bugs reported by beta testers? ALL reported bugs 
should be investigated and prioritized.

/Trevor

From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>
 [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of SULLIVAN, 
BRYAN L (BRYAN L)
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2017 10:14 AM
To: Wenjing Chu <wenjing@huawei.com<mailto:wenjing@huawei.com>>; Dave 
Urschatz <dave.ursch...@cengn.ca<mailto:dave.ursch...@cengn.ca>>; Lincoln 
Lavoie <lylav...@iol.unh.edu<mailto:lylav...@iol.unh.edu>>
Cc: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

I added the table for beta participants.

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | AT

From: Wenjing Chu [mailto:wenjing@huawei.com]
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 10:44 PM
To: Dave Urschatz <dave.ursch...@cengn.ca<mailto:dave.ursch...@cengn.ca>>; 
Lincoln Lavoie <lylav...@iol.unh.edu<mailto:lylav...@iol.unh.edu>>; SULLIVAN, 
BRYAN L (BRYAN L) 
<bryan.sulli...@research.att.com<mailto:bryan.sulli...@research.att.com>>
Cc: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

Here is the Beta test page: 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/dovetail/Dovetail+Beta<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_display_dovetail_Dovetail-2BBeta=DwMGaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=ML-JPRZQOfToJjMwlJLPlcWimAEwMA5DZGNIrk-cgy0=v9curOpTMUn7PlLbVHRqXlFJZJ275Ip0Q09llzCX4dI=0kagZLID-U737LKkt3XcjnqiEd5jSAxLtDcRofH-Yys=>
I think I summarized most of the comments I received so far. Please let me know 
if I missed anything. Additional comments welcome and we’ll discuss in this 
week’s call.
Again, thanks Bryan and Lincoln for your suggestions.

Dave,
On your first two points, please refer to the above wiki page.
For the third point, yes, current testing assumes Pharos pods for the system 
under test.

Wenjing

From: Wenjing Chu
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 4:47 PM
To: 'Dave Urschatz' <dave.ursch...@cengn.ca<mailto:dave.ursch...@cengn.ca>>; 
Lincoln Lavoie <lylav...@iol.unh.edu<mailto:lylav...@iol.unh.edu>>; SULLIVAN, 
BRYAN L (BRYAN L) 
<bryan.sulli...@research.att.com<mailto:bryan.sulli...@research.att.com>>
Cc: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

Just an ack that I’ll be populating a wiki page today incorporating discussions 
at last Friday’s call and some of comments in th

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

[Lincoln Lavoie]

It's not suppose to be "only bugs from beta testers," but beta testers are
expected to be the primary source of bug reports.  During the beta period,
no new tests or features would be added, only bug fixes.

Cheers,
Lincoln

On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 2:25 AM, Wenjing Chu <wenjing@huawei.com> wrote:

> Trevor & Bryan,
>
>
>
> Thanks for the interest in participating in Beta. It’s great to see the
> leaders stepping up.
>
>
>
> I think the quoted line meant to say that bugs encountered in beta have
> priority and the immediate attention, esp. if/when we have to choose.
> Another point is that during beta we have interests in stability as well,
> fixing non-critical bugs already known before the beta may cause more harm
> than good. That’s how I understood it as a developer.
>
>
>
> Lincoln, do you like to add comment as it’s from one of your suggestions?
>
>
>
> We can discuss & rephrase it as appropriate.
>
>
>
> Wenjing
>
>
>
> *From:* Cooper, Trevor [mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 16, 2017 7:01 PM
> *To:* SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) <bryan.sulli...@research.att.com>;
> Wenjing Chu <wenjing@huawei.com>; Dave Urschatz <
> dave.ursch...@cengn.ca>; Lincoln Lavoie <lylav...@iol.unh.edu>
> *Cc:* opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
>
> *Subject:* RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11
>
>
>
> I added Intel to the table as offering a Pharos POD for the beta trial.
>
>
>
> “Only bugs submitted by the beta testers will be reviewed and accepted
> during Beta” … why would we only fix bugs reported by beta testers? ALL
> reported bugs should be investigated and prioritized.
>
>
>
> /Trevor
>
>
>
> *From:* opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [
> mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
> <opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>] *On Behalf Of *SULLIVAN,
> BRYAN L (BRYAN L)
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 16, 2017 10:14 AM
> *To:* Wenjing Chu <wenjing@huawei.com>; Dave Urschatz <
> dave.ursch...@cengn.ca>; Lincoln Lavoie <lylav...@iol.unh.edu>
> *Cc:* opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> *Subject:* Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11
>
>
>
> I added the table for beta participants.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bryan Sullivan | AT
>
>
>
> *From:* Wenjing Chu [mailto:wenjing@huawei.com
> <wenjing@huawei.com>]
> *Sent:* Monday, August 14, 2017 10:44 PM
> *To:* Dave Urschatz <dave.ursch...@cengn.ca>; Lincoln Lavoie <
> lylav...@iol.unh.edu>; SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) <
> bryan.sulli...@research.att.com>
> *Cc:* opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> *Subject:* RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11
>
>
>
> Here is the Beta test page: https://wiki.opnfv.org/
> display/dovetail/Dovetail+Beta
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_display_dovetail_Dovetail-2BBeta=DwMGaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=ML-JPRZQOfToJjMwlJLPlcWimAEwMA5DZGNIrk-cgy0=v9curOpTMUn7PlLbVHRqXlFJZJ275Ip0Q09llzCX4dI=0kagZLID-U737LKkt3XcjnqiEd5jSAxLtDcRofH-Yys=>
>
> I think I summarized most of the comments I received so far. Please let me
> know if I missed anything. Additional comments welcome and we’ll discuss in
> this week’s call.
>
> Again, thanks Bryan and Lincoln for your suggestions.
>
>
>
> Dave,
>
> On your first two points, please refer to the above wiki page.
>
> For the third point, yes, current testing assumes Pharos pods for the
> system under test.
>
>
>
> Wenjing
>
>
>
> *From:* Wenjing Chu
> *Sent:* Monday, August 14, 2017 4:47 PM
> *To:* 'Dave Urschatz' <dave.ursch...@cengn.ca>; Lincoln Lavoie <
> lylav...@iol.unh.edu>; SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) <
> bryan.sulli...@research.att.com>
> *Cc:* opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> *Subject:* RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11
>
>
>
> Just an ack that I’ll be populating a wiki page today incorporating
> discussions at last Friday’s call and some of comments in this thread.
>
> Thanks for all the inputs.
>
>
>
> Wenjing
>
>
>
> *From:* opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [
> mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
> <opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>] *On Behalf Of *Dave Urschatz
> *Sent:* Friday, August 11, 2017 10:39 AM
> *To:* Lincoln Lavoie <lylav...@iol.unh.edu>; SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) <
> bryan.sulli...@research.att.com>
> *Cc:* opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> *Subject:* Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11
&g

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

[Wenjing Chu]

Trevor & Bryan,

Thanks for the interest in participating in Beta. It’s great to see the leaders 
stepping up.

I think the quoted line meant to say that bugs encountered in beta have 
priority and the immediate attention, esp. if/when we have to choose. Another 
point is that during beta we have interests in stability as well, fixing 
non-critical bugs already known before the beta may cause more harm than good. 
That’s how I understood it as a developer.

Lincoln, do you like to add comment as it’s from one of your suggestions?

We can discuss & rephrase it as appropriate.

Wenjing

From: Cooper, Trevor [mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2017 7:01 PM
To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) <bryan.sulli...@research.att.com>; Wenjing Chu 
<wenjing@huawei.com>; Dave Urschatz <dave.ursch...@cengn.ca>; Lincoln 
Lavoie <lylav...@iol.unh.edu>
Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

I added Intel to the table as offering a Pharos POD for the beta trial.

“Only bugs submitted by the beta testers will be reviewed and accepted during 
Beta” … why would we only fix bugs reported by beta testers? ALL reported bugs 
should be investigated and prioritized.

/Trevor

From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>
 [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of SULLIVAN, 
BRYAN L (BRYAN L)
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2017 10:14 AM
To: Wenjing Chu <wenjing@huawei.com<mailto:wenjing@huawei.com>>; Dave 
Urschatz <dave.ursch...@cengn.ca<mailto:dave.ursch...@cengn.ca>>; Lincoln 
Lavoie <lylav...@iol.unh.edu<mailto:lylav...@iol.unh.edu>>
Cc: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

I added the table for beta participants.

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | AT

From: Wenjing Chu [mailto:wenjing@huawei.com]
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 10:44 PM
To: Dave Urschatz <dave.ursch...@cengn.ca<mailto:dave.ursch...@cengn.ca>>; 
Lincoln Lavoie <lylav...@iol.unh.edu<mailto:lylav...@iol.unh.edu>>; SULLIVAN, 
BRYAN L (BRYAN L) 
<bryan.sulli...@research.att.com<mailto:bryan.sulli...@research.att.com>>
Cc: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

Here is the Beta test page: 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/dovetail/Dovetail+Beta<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_display_dovetail_Dovetail-2BBeta=DwMGaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=ML-JPRZQOfToJjMwlJLPlcWimAEwMA5DZGNIrk-cgy0=v9curOpTMUn7PlLbVHRqXlFJZJ275Ip0Q09llzCX4dI=0kagZLID-U737LKkt3XcjnqiEd5jSAxLtDcRofH-Yys=>
I think I summarized most of the comments I received so far. Please let me know 
if I missed anything. Additional comments welcome and we’ll discuss in this 
week’s call.
Again, thanks Bryan and Lincoln for your suggestions.

Dave,
On your first two points, please refer to the above wiki page.
For the third point, yes, current testing assumes Pharos pods for the system 
under test.

Wenjing

From: Wenjing Chu
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 4:47 PM
To: 'Dave Urschatz' <dave.ursch...@cengn.ca<mailto:dave.ursch...@cengn.ca>>; 
Lincoln Lavoie <lylav...@iol.unh.edu<mailto:lylav...@iol.unh.edu>>; SULLIVAN, 
BRYAN L (BRYAN L) 
<bryan.sulli...@research.att.com<mailto:bryan.sulli...@research.att.com>>
Cc: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

Just an ack that I’ll be populating a wiki page today incorporating discussions 
at last Friday’s call and some of comments in this thread.
Thanks for all the inputs.

Wenjing

From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>
 [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Dave Urschatz
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 10:39 AM
To: Lincoln Lavoie <lylav...@iol.unh.edu<mailto:lylav...@iol.unh.edu>>; 
SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) 
<bryan.sulli...@research.att.com<mailto:bryan.sulli...@research.att.com>>
Cc: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

I missed the call today also.

  *   What timeframe are we planning this for?
  *   How long would the trial be?
  *   Bare Metal Pharos PODs only?  (I think this is yes but want to confirm.)

Best Regards,
Dave

Dave Urschatz
Senior Technical Lead
[cid:image001.jpg@01D316E5.72FF4450]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__cengn.ca_=DwMGaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=ML-JPRZQOfToJjMwlJLPlcWimAEwMA5DZGNIrk-cgy0=v9curOp

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

[Cooper, Trevor]

I added Intel to the table as offering a Pharos POD for the beta trial.

“Only bugs submitted by the beta testers will be reviewed and accepted during 
Beta” … why would we only fix bugs reported by beta testers? ALL reported bugs 
should be investigated and prioritized.

/Trevor

From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of SULLIVAN, 
BRYAN L (BRYAN L)
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2017 10:14 AM
To: Wenjing Chu <wenjing@huawei.com>; Dave Urschatz 
<dave.ursch...@cengn.ca>; Lincoln Lavoie <lylav...@iol.unh.edu>
Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

I added the table for beta participants.

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | AT

From: Wenjing Chu [mailto:wenjing@huawei.com]
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 10:44 PM
To: Dave Urschatz <dave.ursch...@cengn.ca<mailto:dave.ursch...@cengn.ca>>; 
Lincoln Lavoie <lylav...@iol.unh.edu<mailto:lylav...@iol.unh.edu>>; SULLIVAN, 
BRYAN L (BRYAN L) 
<bryan.sulli...@research.att.com<mailto:bryan.sulli...@research.att.com>>
Cc: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

Here is the Beta test page: 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/dovetail/Dovetail+Beta<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_display_dovetail_Dovetail-2BBeta=DwMGaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=ML-JPRZQOfToJjMwlJLPlcWimAEwMA5DZGNIrk-cgy0=v9curOpTMUn7PlLbVHRqXlFJZJ275Ip0Q09llzCX4dI=0kagZLID-U737LKkt3XcjnqiEd5jSAxLtDcRofH-Yys=>
I think I summarized most of the comments I received so far. Please let me know 
if I missed anything. Additional comments welcome and we’ll discuss in this 
week’s call.
Again, thanks Bryan and Lincoln for your suggestions.

Dave,
On your first two points, please refer to the above wiki page.
For the third point, yes, current testing assumes Pharos pods for the system 
under test.

Wenjing

From: Wenjing Chu
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 4:47 PM
To: 'Dave Urschatz' <dave.ursch...@cengn.ca<mailto:dave.ursch...@cengn.ca>>; 
Lincoln Lavoie <lylav...@iol.unh.edu<mailto:lylav...@iol.unh.edu>>; SULLIVAN, 
BRYAN L (BRYAN L) 
<bryan.sulli...@research.att.com<mailto:bryan.sulli...@research.att.com>>
Cc: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

Just an ack that I’ll be populating a wiki page today incorporating discussions 
at last Friday’s call and some of comments in this thread.
Thanks for all the inputs.

Wenjing

From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>
 [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Dave Urschatz
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 10:39 AM
To: Lincoln Lavoie <lylav...@iol.unh.edu<mailto:lylav...@iol.unh.edu>>; 
SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) 
<bryan.sulli...@research.att.com<mailto:bryan.sulli...@research.att.com>>
Cc: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

I missed the call today also.

  *   What timeframe are we planning this for?
  *   How long would the trial be?
  *   Bare Metal Pharos PODs only?  (I think this is yes but want to confirm.)

Best Regards,
Dave

Dave Urschatz
Senior Technical Lead
[cid:image001.jpg@01D316C1.833E8C50]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__cengn.ca_=DwMGaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=ML-JPRZQOfToJjMwlJLPlcWimAEwMA5DZGNIrk-cgy0=v9curOpTMUn7PlLbVHRqXlFJZJ275Ip0Q09llzCX4dI=0P_h6U9LBNif0kZMknVIfAog3vlWe-ytlJS1Tm3zbTA=>
555 Legget Drive| Tower A | Suite 600| Ottawa ON | K2K 2X3 | 613-963-1201


From: 
<opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>>
 on behalf of Lincon Lavoie <lylav...@iol.unh.edu<mailto:lylav...@iol.unh.edu>>
Date: Friday, August 11, 2017 at 11:16 AM
To: "SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L)" 
<bryan.sulli...@research.att.com<mailto:bryan.sulli...@research.att.com>>
Cc: 
"opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>" 
<opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

And 3rd party labs. :)

On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 11:14 AM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) 
<bryan.sulli...@research.att.com<mailto:bryan.sulli...@research.att.com>> wrote:
And before I forget, we should also allow end-users to participate in the beta 
program of course!

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | AT

-Original Message-
From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L)
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 8:04 AM
To: 'Lincoln Lavoie'

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

[SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L)]

I added the table for beta participants.

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | AT

From: Wenjing Chu [mailto:wenjing@huawei.com]
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 10:44 PM
To: Dave Urschatz <dave.ursch...@cengn.ca>; Lincoln Lavoie 
<lylav...@iol.unh.edu>; SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) 
<bryan.sulli...@research.att.com>
Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

Here is the Beta test page: 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/dovetail/Dovetail+Beta<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_display_dovetail_Dovetail-2BBeta=DwMGaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=ML-JPRZQOfToJjMwlJLPlcWimAEwMA5DZGNIrk-cgy0=v9curOpTMUn7PlLbVHRqXlFJZJ275Ip0Q09llzCX4dI=0kagZLID-U737LKkt3XcjnqiEd5jSAxLtDcRofH-Yys=>
I think I summarized most of the comments I received so far. Please let me know 
if I missed anything. Additional comments welcome and we’ll discuss in this 
week’s call.
Again, thanks Bryan and Lincoln for your suggestions.

Dave,
On your first two points, please refer to the above wiki page.
For the third point, yes, current testing assumes Pharos pods for the system 
under test.

Wenjing

From: Wenjing Chu
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 4:47 PM
To: 'Dave Urschatz' <dave.ursch...@cengn.ca<mailto:dave.ursch...@cengn.ca>>; 
Lincoln Lavoie <lylav...@iol.unh.edu<mailto:lylav...@iol.unh.edu>>; SULLIVAN, 
BRYAN L (BRYAN L) 
<bryan.sulli...@research.att.com<mailto:bryan.sulli...@research.att.com>>
Cc: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

Just an ack that I’ll be populating a wiki page today incorporating discussions 
at last Friday’s call and some of comments in this thread.
Thanks for all the inputs.

Wenjing

From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>
 [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Dave Urschatz
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 10:39 AM
To: Lincoln Lavoie <lylav...@iol.unh.edu<mailto:lylav...@iol.unh.edu>>; 
SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) 
<bryan.sulli...@research.att.com<mailto:bryan.sulli...@research.att.com>>
Cc: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

I missed the call today also.

  *   What timeframe are we planning this for?
  *   How long would the trial be?
  *   Bare Metal Pharos PODs only?  (I think this is yes but want to confirm.)

Best Regards,
Dave

Dave Urschatz
Senior Technical Lead
[cid:image001.jpg@01D31678.61A55C70]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__cengn.ca_=DwMGaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=ML-JPRZQOfToJjMwlJLPlcWimAEwMA5DZGNIrk-cgy0=v9curOpTMUn7PlLbVHRqXlFJZJ275Ip0Q09llzCX4dI=0P_h6U9LBNif0kZMknVIfAog3vlWe-ytlJS1Tm3zbTA=>
555 Legget Drive| Tower A | Suite 600| Ottawa ON | K2K 2X3 | 613-963-1201


From: 
<opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>>
 on behalf of Lincon Lavoie <lylav...@iol.unh.edu<mailto:lylav...@iol.unh.edu>>
Date: Friday, August 11, 2017 at 11:16 AM
To: "SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L)" 
<bryan.sulli...@research.att.com<mailto:bryan.sulli...@research.att.com>>
Cc: 
"opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>" 
<opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

And 3rd party labs. :)

On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 11:14 AM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) 
<bryan.sulli...@research.att.com<mailto:bryan.sulli...@research.att.com>> wrote:
And before I forget, we should also allow end-users to participate in the beta 
program of course!

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | AT

-Original Message-
From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L)
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 8:04 AM
To: 'Lincoln Lavoie' <lylav...@iol.unh.edu<mailto:lylav...@iol.unh.edu>>; 
Christopher Price 
<christopher.pr...@ericsson.com<mailto:christopher.pr...@ericsson.com>>
Cc: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

Wenjing is going to add a page where we can document the plans and results for 
the beta program. Here’s what I suggested:
• We freeze the CVP suite and Dovetail tools prior to start of the beta
• We offer all OPNFV vendor members who produce commercial platforms that are 
applicable the chance to run the tests against their product and produce 
results provided back to OPNFV (in the form that CVP result reviewers will be 
expected to assess)
• We get C to provide a team of result reviewers for the beta
• On the wiki we build a table of those vendors

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

[Wenjing Chu]

Here is the Beta test page: 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/dovetail/Dovetail+Beta
I think I summarized most of the comments I received so far. Please let me know 
if I missed anything. Additional comments welcome and we’ll discuss in this 
week’s call.
Again, thanks Bryan and Lincoln for your suggestions.

Dave,
On your first two points, please refer to the above wiki page.
For the third point, yes, current testing assumes Pharos pods for the system 
under test.

Wenjing

From: Wenjing Chu
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 4:47 PM
To: 'Dave Urschatz' <dave.ursch...@cengn.ca>; Lincoln Lavoie 
<lylav...@iol.unh.edu>; SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) 
<bryan.sulli...@research.att.com>
Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

Just an ack that I’ll be populating a wiki page today incorporating discussions 
at last Friday’s call and some of comments in this thread.
Thanks for all the inputs.

Wenjing

From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>
 [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Dave Urschatz
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 10:39 AM
To: Lincoln Lavoie <lylav...@iol.unh.edu<mailto:lylav...@iol.unh.edu>>; 
SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) 
<bryan.sulli...@research.att.com<mailto:bryan.sulli...@research.att.com>>
Cc: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

I missed the call today also.

·What timeframe are we planning this for?

·How long would the trial be?

·Bare Metal Pharos PODs only?  (I think this is yes but want to 
confirm.)

Best Regards,
Dave

Dave Urschatz
Senior Technical Lead
[cid:image001.jpg@01D3154E.C7AE7D10]<http://cengn.ca/>
555 Legget Drive| Tower A | Suite 600| Ottawa ON | K2K 2X3 | 613-963-1201


From: 
<opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>>
 on behalf of Lincon Lavoie <lylav...@iol.unh.edu<mailto:lylav...@iol.unh.edu>>
Date: Friday, August 11, 2017 at 11:16 AM
To: "SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L)" 
<bryan.sulli...@research.att.com<mailto:bryan.sulli...@research.att.com>>
Cc: 
"opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>" 
<opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

And 3rd party labs. :)

On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 11:14 AM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) 
<bryan.sulli...@research.att.com<mailto:bryan.sulli...@research.att.com>> wrote:
And before I forget, we should also allow end-users to participate in the beta 
program of course!

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | AT

-Original Message-
From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L)
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 8:04 AM
To: 'Lincoln Lavoie' <lylav...@iol.unh.edu<mailto:lylav...@iol.unh.edu>>; 
Christopher Price 
<christopher.pr...@ericsson.com<mailto:christopher.pr...@ericsson.com>>
Cc: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

Wenjing is going to add a page where we can document the plans and results for 
the beta program. Here’s what I suggested:
• We freeze the CVP suite and Dovetail tools prior to start of the beta
• We offer all OPNFV vendor members who produce commercial platforms that are 
applicable the chance to run the tests against their product and produce 
results provided back to OPNFV (in the form that CVP result reviewers will be 
expected to assess)
• We get C to provide a team of result reviewers for the beta
• On the wiki we build a table of those vendors who plan to do this, the 
results of the tests as assessed by the team, and any feedback of the vendor 
(sub-pages as needed depending upon the amount of feedback)
• We do not release until both Dovetail and C are satisfied with the beta 
results, e.g. for scope (# of vendors participating) and results (reliability 
of the test suite/tools, and rate of compliance success)

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | AT

From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>
 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>]
 On Behalf Of Lincoln Lavoie
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 7:40 AM
To: Christopher Price 
<christopher.pr...@ericsson.com<mailto:christopher.pr...@ericsson.com>>
Cc: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

Hi Chris,

We talked about this at the very end of the call, and I think it's in 
alignment.  I think we just 

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

[Wenjing Chu]

Just an ack that I’ll be populating a wiki page today incorporating discussions 
at last Friday’s call and some of comments in this thread.
Thanks for all the inputs.

Wenjing

From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Dave Urschatz
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 10:39 AM
To: Lincoln Lavoie <lylav...@iol.unh.edu>; SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) 
<bryan.sulli...@research.att.com>
Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

I missed the call today also.

·What timeframe are we planning this for?

·How long would the trial be?

·Bare Metal Pharos PODs only?  (I think this is yes but want to 
confirm.)

Best Regards,
Dave

Dave Urschatz
Senior Technical Lead
[cid:image001.jpg@01D3151C.E79D7540]<http://cengn.ca/>
555 Legget Drive| Tower A | Suite 600| Ottawa ON | K2K 2X3 | 613-963-1201


From: 
<opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>>
 on behalf of Lincon Lavoie <lylav...@iol.unh.edu<mailto:lylav...@iol.unh.edu>>
Date: Friday, August 11, 2017 at 11:16 AM
To: "SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L)" 
<bryan.sulli...@research.att.com<mailto:bryan.sulli...@research.att.com>>
Cc: 
"opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>" 
<opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

And 3rd party labs. :)

On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 11:14 AM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) 
<bryan.sulli...@research.att.com<mailto:bryan.sulli...@research.att.com>> wrote:
And before I forget, we should also allow end-users to participate in the beta 
program of course!

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | AT

-Original Message-
From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L)
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 8:04 AM
To: 'Lincoln Lavoie' <lylav...@iol.unh.edu<mailto:lylav...@iol.unh.edu>>; 
Christopher Price 
<christopher.pr...@ericsson.com<mailto:christopher.pr...@ericsson.com>>
Cc: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

Wenjing is going to add a page where we can document the plans and results for 
the beta program. Here’s what I suggested:
• We freeze the CVP suite and Dovetail tools prior to start of the beta
• We offer all OPNFV vendor members who produce commercial platforms that are 
applicable the chance to run the tests against their product and produce 
results provided back to OPNFV (in the form that CVP result reviewers will be 
expected to assess)
• We get C to provide a team of result reviewers for the beta
• On the wiki we build a table of those vendors who plan to do this, the 
results of the tests as assessed by the team, and any feedback of the vendor 
(sub-pages as needed depending upon the amount of feedback)
• We do not release until both Dovetail and C are satisfied with the beta 
results, e.g. for scope (# of vendors participating) and results (reliability 
of the test suite/tools, and rate of compliance success)

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | AT

From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>
 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>]
 On Behalf Of Lincoln Lavoie
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 7:40 AM
To: Christopher Price 
<christopher.pr...@ericsson.com<mailto:christopher.pr...@ericsson.com>>
Cc: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

Hi Chris,

We talked about this at the very end of the call, and I think it's in 
alignment.  I think we just need to write down the "rules" for the beta trial 
period, and get people signed up to participate in that process.  In other 
groups, I've seen the "cookie" to get that is the beta users would be the first 
users listed as "certified" and the organization would provide some press / 
media coverage to promote that accomplishment.

Cheers,
Lincoln

On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Christopher Price 
<mailto:christopher.pr...@ericsson.com<mailto:christopher.pr...@ericsson.com>> 
wrote:
Sounds like a good approach Lincoln.  It would be nice to see how something 
like that fits into our current activities.  Sorry I couldn’t be on the call to 
discuss it today, finding myself a little over scheduled at the moment.

/ Chris

From: Lincoln Lavoie <mailto:lylav...@iol.unh.edu<mailto:lylav...@iol.unh.edu>>
Date: Friday, 11 August 2017 at 16:01
To: Christopher Price 
<mailto:christopher.pr...@ericsson.com<mailto:christopher.pr...@eri

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

[Dave Urschatz]

I missed the call today also.

· What timeframe are we planning this for?

· How long would the trial be?

· Bare Metal Pharos PODs only?  (I think this is yes but want to 
confirm.)

Best Regards,
Dave

Dave Urschatz
Senior Technical Lead
[cid:image001.jpg@01D312A7.37C852B0]<http://cengn.ca/>
555 Legget Drive| Tower A | Suite 600| Ottawa ON | K2K 2X3 | 613-963-1201


From: <opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org> on behalf of Lincon Lavoie 
<lylav...@iol.unh.edu>
Date: Friday, August 11, 2017 at 11:16 AM
To: "SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L)" <bryan.sulli...@research.att.com>
Cc: "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

And 3rd party labs. :)

On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 11:14 AM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) 
<bryan.sulli...@research.att.com<mailto:bryan.sulli...@research.att.com>> wrote:
And before I forget, we should also allow end-users to participate in the beta 
program of course!

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | AT

-Original Message-
From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L)
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 8:04 AM
To: 'Lincoln Lavoie' <lylav...@iol.unh.edu<mailto:lylav...@iol.unh.edu>>; 
Christopher Price 
<christopher.pr...@ericsson.com<mailto:christopher.pr...@ericsson.com>>
Cc: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

Wenjing is going to add a page where we can document the plans and results for 
the beta program. Here’s what I suggested:
• We freeze the CVP suite and Dovetail tools prior to start of the beta
• We offer all OPNFV vendor members who produce commercial platforms that are 
applicable the chance to run the tests against their product and produce 
results provided back to OPNFV (in the form that CVP result reviewers will be 
expected to assess)
• We get C to provide a team of result reviewers for the beta
• On the wiki we build a table of those vendors who plan to do this, the 
results of the tests as assessed by the team, and any feedback of the vendor 
(sub-pages as needed depending upon the amount of feedback)
• We do not release until both Dovetail and C are satisfied with the beta 
results, e.g. for scope (# of vendors participating) and results (reliability 
of the test suite/tools, and rate of compliance success)

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | AT

From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>
 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>]
 On Behalf Of Lincoln Lavoie
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 7:40 AM
To: Christopher Price 
<christopher.pr...@ericsson.com<mailto:christopher.pr...@ericsson.com>>
Cc: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

Hi Chris,

We talked about this at the very end of the call, and I think it's in 
alignment.  I think we just need to write down the "rules" for the beta trial 
period, and get people signed up to participate in that process.  In other 
groups, I've seen the "cookie" to get that is the beta users would be the first 
users listed as "certified" and the organization would provide some press / 
media coverage to promote that accomplishment.

Cheers,
Lincoln

On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Christopher Price 
<mailto:christopher.pr...@ericsson.com<mailto:christopher.pr...@ericsson.com>> 
wrote:
Sounds like a good approach Lincoln.  It would be nice to see how something 
like that fits into our current activities.  Sorry I couldn’t be on the call to 
discuss it today, finding myself a little over scheduled at the moment.

/ Chris

From: Lincoln Lavoie <mailto:lylav...@iol.unh.edu<mailto:lylav...@iol.unh.edu>>
Date: Friday, 11 August 2017 at 16:01
To: Christopher Price 
<mailto:christopher.pr...@ericsson.com<mailto:christopher.pr...@ericsson.com>>
Cc: Tianhongbo 
<mailto:hongbo.tianhon...@huawei.com<mailto:hongbo.tianhon...@huawei.com>>, 
TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV 
<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>>

Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

Hi Chris,

What I've seen other programs do for trials/launch is the following:

1. Freeze the development of new work
2. A group of companies or users would volunteer to be beta trial testers, 
submitting feedback / bugs
3. Only bug fixes from those beta "customers" are reviewed and accepted.
4. We need to decide the beta outcome requirements (i.e. all customers are 
passing, all tests run, etc).
5. Once that outcome mark is hit, that version would be considered the version 
subm

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

[Lincoln Lavoie]

And 3rd party labs. :)

On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 11:14 AM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) <
bryan.sulli...@research.att.com> wrote:

> And before I forget, we should also allow end-users to participate in the
> beta program of course!
>
> Thanks,
> Bryan Sullivan | AT
>
> -Original Message-
> From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L)
> Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 8:04 AM
> To: 'Lincoln Lavoie' <lylav...@iol.unh.edu>; Christopher Price <
> christopher.pr...@ericsson.com>
> Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11
>
> Wenjing is going to add a page where we can document the plans and results
> for the beta program. Here’s what I suggested:
> • We freeze the CVP suite and Dovetail tools prior to start of the beta
> • We offer all OPNFV vendor members who produce commercial platforms that
> are applicable the chance to run the tests against their product and
> produce results provided back to OPNFV (in the form that CVP result
> reviewers will be expected to assess)
> • We get C to provide a team of result reviewers for the beta
> • On the wiki we build a table of those vendors who plan to do this, the
> results of the tests as assessed by the team, and any feedback of the
> vendor (sub-pages as needed depending upon the amount of feedback)
> • We do not release until both Dovetail and C are satisfied with the
> beta results, e.g. for scope (# of vendors participating) and results
> (reliability of the test suite/tools, and rate of compliance success)
>
> Thanks,
> Bryan Sullivan | AT
>
> From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:
> opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Lincoln Lavoie
> Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 7:40 AM
> To: Christopher Price <christopher.pr...@ericsson.com>
> Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> We talked about this at the very end of the call, and I think it's in
> alignment.  I think we just need to write down the "rules" for the beta
> trial period, and get people signed up to participate in that process.  In
> other groups, I've seen the "cookie" to get that is the beta users would be
> the first users listed as "certified" and the organization would provide
> some press / media coverage to promote that accomplishment.
>
> Cheers,
> Lincoln
>
> On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Christopher Price  christopher.pr...@ericsson.com> wrote:
> Sounds like a good approach Lincoln.  It would be nice to see how
> something like that fits into our current activities.  Sorry I couldn’t be
> on the call to discuss it today, finding myself a little over scheduled at
> the moment.
>
> / Chris
>
> From: Lincoln Lavoie <mailto:lylav...@iol.unh.edu>
> Date: Friday, 11 August 2017 at 16:01
> To: Christopher Price <mailto:christopher.pr...@ericsson.com>
> Cc: Tianhongbo <mailto:hongbo.tianhon...@huawei.com>, TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV
> <mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
>
> Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> What I've seen other programs do for trials/launch is the following:
>
> 1. Freeze the development of new work
> 2. A group of companies or users would volunteer to be beta trial testers,
> submitting feedback / bugs
> 3. Only bug fixes from those beta "customers" are reviewed and accepted.
> 4. We need to decide the beta outcome requirements (i.e. all customers are
> passing, all tests run, etc).
> 5. Once that outcome mark is hit, that version would be considered the
> version submitted for approval.
>
> Cheers,
> Lincoln
>
> On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 5:12 AM, Christopher Price  christopher.pr...@ericsson.com> wrote:
> Hi Hongbo,
>
> Thanks, I’ve seen the information on the wiki.
> I guess the questions I have relates more to:  Once we have the tool in a
> ready state, do we have a plan to validate it against volunteer commercial
> systems prior to having the TSC vote and making it generally available?  I
> didn’t see that information on the wiki page, maybe I missed it?
>
> / Chris
>
> From: Tianhongbo <mailto:hongbo.tianhon...@huawei.com>
> Date: Friday, 11 August 2017 at 11:05
> To: Christopher Price <mailto:christopher.pr...@ericsson.com>,
> TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV <mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
> Subject: RE: [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11
>
> Hi Chris:
>
> Here is the page for recoding the history of this. We can discuss further.
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.
> opnfv.org_display_dove

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

[SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L)]

And before I forget, we should also allow end-users to participate in the beta 
program of course!

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | AT

-Original Message-
From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) 
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 8:04 AM
To: 'Lincoln Lavoie' <lylav...@iol.unh.edu>; Christopher Price 
<christopher.pr...@ericsson.com>
Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

Wenjing is going to add a page where we can document the plans and results for 
the beta program. Here’s what I suggested:
• We freeze the CVP suite and Dovetail tools prior to start of the beta
• We offer all OPNFV vendor members who produce commercial platforms that are 
applicable the chance to run the tests against their product and produce 
results provided back to OPNFV (in the form that CVP result reviewers will be 
expected to assess)
• We get C to provide a team of result reviewers for the beta
• On the wiki we build a table of those vendors who plan to do this, the 
results of the tests as assessed by the team, and any feedback of the vendor 
(sub-pages as needed depending upon the amount of feedback)
• We do not release until both Dovetail and C are satisfied with the beta 
results, e.g. for scope (# of vendors participating) and results (reliability 
of the test suite/tools, and rate of compliance success)

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | AT

From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Lincoln Lavoie
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 7:40 AM
To: Christopher Price <christopher.pr...@ericsson.com>
Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

Hi Chris,

We talked about this at the very end of the call, and I think it's in 
alignment.  I think we just need to write down the "rules" for the beta trial 
period, and get people signed up to participate in that process.  In other 
groups, I've seen the "cookie" to get that is the beta users would be the first 
users listed as "certified" and the organization would provide some press / 
media coverage to promote that accomplishment.

Cheers,
Lincoln

On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Christopher Price 
<mailto:christopher.pr...@ericsson.com> wrote:
Sounds like a good approach Lincoln.  It would be nice to see how something 
like that fits into our current activities.  Sorry I couldn’t be on the call to 
discuss it today, finding myself a little over scheduled at the moment. 
 
/ Chris
 
From: Lincoln Lavoie <mailto:lylav...@iol.unh.edu>
Date: Friday, 11 August 2017 at 16:01
To: Christopher Price <mailto:christopher.pr...@ericsson.com>
Cc: Tianhongbo <mailto:hongbo.tianhon...@huawei.com>, TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV 
<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>

Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11
 
Hi Chris, 
 
What I've seen other programs do for trials/launch is the following:
 
1. Freeze the development of new work
2. A group of companies or users would volunteer to be beta trial testers, 
submitting feedback / bugs
3. Only bug fixes from those beta "customers" are reviewed and accepted.
4. We need to decide the beta outcome requirements (i.e. all customers are 
passing, all tests run, etc).
5. Once that outcome mark is hit, that version would be considered the version 
submitted for approval.
 
Cheers,
Lincoln
 
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 5:12 AM, Christopher Price 
<mailto:christopher.pr...@ericsson.com> wrote:
Hi Hongbo,
 
Thanks, I’ve seen the information on the wiki.
I guess the questions I have relates more to:  Once we have the tool in a ready 
state, do we have a plan to validate it against volunteer commercial systems 
prior to having the TSC vote and making it generally available?  I didn’t see 
that information on the wiki page, maybe I missed it?
 
/ Chris
 
From: Tianhongbo <mailto:hongbo.tianhon...@huawei.com>
Date: Friday, 11 August 2017 at 11:05
To: Christopher Price <mailto:christopher.pr...@ericsson.com>, TECH-DISCUSS 
OPNFV <mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: RE: [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11
 
Hi Chris:
 
Here is the page for recoding the history of this. We can discuss further.
 
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_display_dovetail_Running-2Bhistory-2Bfor-2Bthe-2Bdovetail-2Btool=DwMFaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=ML-JPRZQOfToJjMwlJLPlcWimAEwMA5DZGNIrk-cgy0=-dwHgwLsTeowK_964D_XAiwPPle4hOsXb81wp9M4rjI=G6rTJNQcAfoxUGn85uFP2BFvW7yxOA-a5DF7tkl_Ex0=
 
Best regards
 
hongbo
 
From: mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of 
Christopher Price
Sent: 2017年8月11日 16:55
To: mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11
 
Hi Guys,
 
Do we have a time-plan for the remain

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

[SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L)]

Wenjing is going to add a page where we can document the plans and results for 
the beta program. Here’s what I suggested:
• We freeze the CVP suite and Dovetail tools prior to start of the beta
• We offer all OPNFV vendor members who produce commercial platforms that are 
applicable the chance to run the tests against their product and produce 
results provided back to OPNFV (in the form that CVP result reviewers will be 
expected to assess)
• We get C to provide a team of result reviewers for the beta
• On the wiki we build a table of those vendors who plan to do this, the 
results of the tests as assessed by the team, and any feedback of the vendor 
(sub-pages as needed depending upon the amount of feedback)
• We do not release until both Dovetail and C are satisfied with the beta 
results, e.g. for scope (# of vendors participating) and results (reliability 
of the test suite/tools, and rate of compliance success)

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | AT

From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Lincoln Lavoie
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 7:40 AM
To: Christopher Price <christopher.pr...@ericsson.com>
Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

Hi Chris,

We talked about this at the very end of the call, and I think it's in 
alignment.  I think we just need to write down the "rules" for the beta trial 
period, and get people signed up to participate in that process.  In other 
groups, I've seen the "cookie" to get that is the beta users would be the first 
users listed as "certified" and the organization would provide some press / 
media coverage to promote that accomplishment.

Cheers,
Lincoln

On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Christopher Price 
<mailto:christopher.pr...@ericsson.com> wrote:
Sounds like a good approach Lincoln.  It would be nice to see how something 
like that fits into our current activities.  Sorry I couldn’t be on the call to 
discuss it today, finding myself a little over scheduled at the moment. 
 
/ Chris
 
From: Lincoln Lavoie <mailto:lylav...@iol.unh.edu>
Date: Friday, 11 August 2017 at 16:01
To: Christopher Price <mailto:christopher.pr...@ericsson.com>
Cc: Tianhongbo <mailto:hongbo.tianhon...@huawei.com>, TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV 
<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>

Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11
 
Hi Chris, 
 
What I've seen other programs do for trials/launch is the following:
 
1. Freeze the development of new work
2. A group of companies or users would volunteer to be beta trial testers, 
submitting feedback / bugs
3. Only bug fixes from those beta "customers" are reviewed and accepted.
4. We need to decide the beta outcome requirements (i.e. all customers are 
passing, all tests run, etc).
5. Once that outcome mark is hit, that version would be considered the version 
submitted for approval.
 
Cheers,
Lincoln
 
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 5:12 AM, Christopher Price 
<mailto:christopher.pr...@ericsson.com> wrote:
Hi Hongbo,
 
Thanks, I’ve seen the information on the wiki.
I guess the questions I have relates more to:  Once we have the tool in a ready 
state, do we have a plan to validate it against volunteer commercial systems 
prior to having the TSC vote and making it generally available?  I didn’t see 
that information on the wiki page, maybe I missed it?
 
/ Chris
 
From: Tianhongbo <mailto:hongbo.tianhon...@huawei.com>
Date: Friday, 11 August 2017 at 11:05
To: Christopher Price <mailto:christopher.pr...@ericsson.com>, TECH-DISCUSS 
OPNFV <mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: RE: [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11
 
Hi Chris:
 
Here is the page for recoding the history of this. We can discuss further.
 
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_display_dovetail_Running-2Bhistory-2Bfor-2Bthe-2Bdovetail-2Btool=DwMFaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=ML-JPRZQOfToJjMwlJLPlcWimAEwMA5DZGNIrk-cgy0=-dwHgwLsTeowK_964D_XAiwPPle4hOsXb81wp9M4rjI=G6rTJNQcAfoxUGn85uFP2BFvW7yxOA-a5DF7tkl_Ex0=
 
Best regards
 
hongbo
 
From: mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of 
Christopher Price
Sent: 2017年8月11日 16:55
To: mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11
 
Hi Guys,
 
Do we have a time-plan for the remaining work?  
 
I see we still have a lot of documentation work to do and the test cases are in 
flux, but we have other things to do as well.
-  Do we intend to test/validate the documentation in any way with 
community scenario’s prior to merging it?  
o   Do we have people, resources and time-plans for that?
-  Will we arrange to test the toolchain against volunteer commercial 
systems in labs prior to making it available fo

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

[Lincoln Lavoie]

Hi Chris,

We talked about this at the very end of the call, and I think it's in
alignment.  I think we just need to write down the "rules" for the beta
trial period, and get people signed up to participate in that process.  In
other groups, I've seen the "cookie" to get that is the beta users would be
the first users listed as "certified" and the organization would provide
some press / media coverage to promote that accomplishment.

Cheers,
Lincoln

On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Christopher Price <
christopher.pr...@ericsson.com> wrote:

> Sounds like a good approach Lincoln.  It would be nice to see how
> something like that fits into our current activities.  Sorry I couldn’t be
> on the call to discuss it today, finding myself a little over scheduled at
> the moment.
>
>
>
> / Chris
>
>
>
> *From: *Lincoln Lavoie <lylav...@iol.unh.edu>
> *Date: *Friday, 11 August 2017 at 16:01
> *To: *Christopher Price <christopher.pr...@ericsson.com>
> *Cc: *Tianhongbo <hongbo.tianhon...@huawei.com>, TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV <
> opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
>
> *Subject: *Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11
>
>
>
> Hi Chris,
>
>
>
> What I've seen other programs do for trials/launch is the following:
>
>
>
> 1. Freeze the development of new work
>
> 2. A group of companies or users would volunteer to be beta trial testers,
> submitting feedback / bugs
>
> 3. Only bug fixes from those beta "customers" are reviewed and accepted.
>
> 4. We need to decide the beta outcome requirements (i.e. all customers are
> passing, all tests run, etc).
>
> 5. Once that outcome mark is hit, that version would be considered the
> version submitted for approval.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
> Lincoln
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 5:12 AM, Christopher Price <
> christopher.pr...@ericsson.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Hongbo,
>
>
>
> Thanks, I’ve seen the information on the wiki.
>
> I guess the questions I have relates more to:  Once we have the tool in a
> ready state, do we have a plan to validate it against volunteer commercial
> systems prior to having the TSC vote and making it generally available?  I
> didn’t see that information on the wiki page, maybe I missed it?
>
>
>
> / Chris
>
>
>
> *From: *Tianhongbo <hongbo.tianhon...@huawei.com>
> *Date: *Friday, 11 August 2017 at 11:05
> *To: *Christopher Price <christopher.pr...@ericsson.com>, TECH-DISCUSS
> OPNFV <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
> *Subject: *RE: [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11
>
>
>
> Hi Chris:
>
>
>
> Here is the page for recoding the history of this. We can discuss further.
>
>
>
> https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/dovetail/Running+
> history+for+the+dovetail+tool
>
>
>
> Best regards
>
>
>
> hongbo
>
>
>
> *From:* opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:
> opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] *On Behalf Of *Christopher
> Price
> *Sent:* 2017年8月11日 16:55
> *To:* opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> *Subject:* Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11
>
>
>
> Hi Guys,
>
>
>
> Do we have a time-plan for the remaining work?
>
>
>
> I see we still have a lot of documentation work to do and the test cases
> are in flux, but we have other things to do as well.
>
> -  Do we intend to test/validate the documentation in any way
> with community scenario’s prior to merging it?
>
> o   Do we have people, resources and time-plans for that?
>
> -  Will we arrange to test the toolchain against volunteer
> commercial systems in labs prior to making it available for use?
>
> o   Same as above; people, resources, time-plans?
>
>
>
> I can also see the links are all pointing to “artifact.opnfv.org” which
> is not I assume where we intend to publish the documentation.
>
>
>
> Would be good to see how these items line up during the status review and
> remaining milestones discussion.
>
>
>
> / Chris
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *<opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org> on behalf of Trevor
> Cooper <trevor.coo...@intel.com>
> *Date: *Friday, 11 August 2017 at 09:29
> *To: *TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11
>
>
>
> Thanks Wenjing. I have updated the docs tracking page, lets review this
> for accuracy and highlight where reviews are most needed
> https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/dovetail/Dovetail+Documentation+for+Review
> …
>
>
>
> /Trevor
>
>
&g

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

[Christopher Price]

Sounds like a good approach Lincoln.  It would be nice to see how something 
like that fits into our current activities.  Sorry I couldn’t be on the call to 
discuss it today, finding myself a little over scheduled at the moment.

/ Chris

From: Lincoln Lavoie <lylav...@iol.unh.edu>
Date: Friday, 11 August 2017 at 16:01
To: Christopher Price <christopher.pr...@ericsson.com>
Cc: Tianhongbo <hongbo.tianhon...@huawei.com>, TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV 
<opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

Hi Chris,

What I've seen other programs do for trials/launch is the following:

1. Freeze the development of new work
2. A group of companies or users would volunteer to be beta trial testers, 
submitting feedback / bugs
3. Only bug fixes from those beta "customers" are reviewed and accepted.
4. We need to decide the beta outcome requirements (i.e. all customers are 
passing, all tests run, etc).
5. Once that outcome mark is hit, that version would be considered the version 
submitted for approval.

Cheers,
Lincoln

On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 5:12 AM, Christopher Price 
<christopher.pr...@ericsson.com<mailto:christopher.pr...@ericsson.com>> wrote:
Hi Hongbo,

Thanks, I’ve seen the information on the wiki.
I guess the questions I have relates more to:  Once we have the tool in a ready 
state, do we have a plan to validate it against volunteer commercial systems 
prior to having the TSC vote and making it generally available?  I didn’t see 
that information on the wiki page, maybe I missed it?

/ Chris

From: Tianhongbo 
<hongbo.tianhon...@huawei.com<mailto:hongbo.tianhon...@huawei.com>>
Date: Friday, 11 August 2017 at 11:05
To: Christopher Price 
<christopher.pr...@ericsson.com<mailto:christopher.pr...@ericsson.com>>, 
TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV 
<opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>>
Subject: RE: [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

Hi Chris:

Here is the page for recoding the history of this. We can discuss further.

https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/dovetail/Running+history+for+the+dovetail+tool

Best regards

hongbo

From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>
 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>]
 On Behalf Of Christopher Price
Sent: 2017年8月11日 16:55
To: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

Hi Guys,

Do we have a time-plan for the remaining work?

I see we still have a lot of documentation work to do and the test cases are in 
flux, but we have other things to do as well.

-  Do we intend to test/validate the documentation in any way with 
community scenario’s prior to merging it?

o   Do we have people, resources and time-plans for that?

-  Will we arrange to test the toolchain against volunteer commercial 
systems in labs prior to making it available for use?

o   Same as above; people, resources, time-plans?

I can also see the links are all pointing to 
“artifact.opnfv.org<http://artifact.opnfv.org>” which is not I assume where we 
intend to publish the documentation.

Would be good to see how these items line up during the status review and 
remaining milestones discussion.

/ Chris


From: 
<opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>>
 on behalf of Trevor Cooper 
<trevor.coo...@intel.com<mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com>>
Date: Friday, 11 August 2017 at 09:29
To: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV 
<opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

Thanks Wenjing. I have updated the docs tracking page, lets review this for 
accuracy and highlight where reviews are most needed 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/dovetail/Dovetail+Documentation+for+Review …

/Trevor


From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>
 [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Wenjing Chu
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 9:14 AM
To: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV 
<opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>>
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

Hi Dovetailers,

Proposed agenda for this week’s call on Friday:


1)  Current tool+test status: (10 min)

a.  dovetail version 0.5

b.  Testing pod resources

2)  Docs, including the test case requirement patch 
https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/38763/1  -(10 min)

3)  Overall status review and plan for the remaining milestones.  (40 min) As 
the project is getting into shape, it’s good time for us to map out the 
remaining milestones and time tab

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

[Lincoln Lavoie]

Hi Chris,

What I've seen other programs do for trials/launch is the following:

1. Freeze the development of new work
2. A group of companies or users would volunteer to be beta trial testers,
submitting feedback / bugs
3. Only bug fixes from those beta "customers" are reviewed and accepted.
4. We need to decide the beta outcome requirements (i.e. all customers are
passing, all tests run, etc).
5. Once that outcome mark is hit, that version would be considered the
version submitted for approval.

Cheers,
Lincoln

On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 5:12 AM, Christopher Price <
christopher.pr...@ericsson.com> wrote:

> Hi Hongbo,
>
>
>
> Thanks, I’ve seen the information on the wiki.
>
> I guess the questions I have relates more to:  Once we have the tool in a
> ready state, do we have a plan to validate it against volunteer commercial
> systems prior to having the TSC vote and making it generally available?  I
> didn’t see that information on the wiki page, maybe I missed it?
>
>
>
> / Chris
>
>
>
> *From: *Tianhongbo <hongbo.tianhon...@huawei.com>
> *Date: *Friday, 11 August 2017 at 11:05
> *To: *Christopher Price <christopher.pr...@ericsson.com>, TECH-DISCUSS
> OPNFV <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
> *Subject: *RE: [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11
>
>
>
> Hi Chris:
>
>
>
> Here is the page for recoding the history of this. We can discuss further.
>
>
>
> https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/dovetail/Running+
> history+for+the+dovetail+tool
>
>
>
> Best regards
>
>
>
> hongbo
>
>
>
> *From:* opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:
> opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] *On Behalf Of *Christopher
> Price
> *Sent:* 2017年8月11日 16:55
> *To:* opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> *Subject:* Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11
>
>
>
> Hi Guys,
>
>
>
> Do we have a time-plan for the remaining work?
>
>
>
> I see we still have a lot of documentation work to do and the test cases
> are in flux, but we have other things to do as well.
>
> -  Do we intend to test/validate the documentation in any way
> with community scenario’s prior to merging it?
>
> o   Do we have people, resources and time-plans for that?
>
> -  Will we arrange to test the toolchain against volunteer
> commercial systems in labs prior to making it available for use?
>
> o   Same as above; people, resources, time-plans?
>
>
>
> I can also see the links are all pointing to “artifact.opnfv.org” which
> is not I assume where we intend to publish the documentation.
>
>
>
> Would be good to see how these items line up during the status review and
> remaining milestones discussion.
>
>
>
> / Chris
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *<opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org> on behalf of Trevor
> Cooper <trevor.coo...@intel.com>
> *Date: *Friday, 11 August 2017 at 09:29
> *To: *TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11
>
>
>
> Thanks Wenjing. I have updated the docs tracking page, lets review this
> for accuracy and highlight where reviews are most needed
> https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/dovetail/Dovetail+Documentation+for+Review
> …
>
>
>
> /Trevor
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [
> mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
> <opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>] *On Behalf Of *Wenjing Chu
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 10, 2017 9:14 AM
> *To:* TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
> *Subject:* [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11
>
>
>
> Hi Dovetailers,
>
>
>
> Proposed agenda for this week’s call on Friday:
>
>
>
> 1)  Current tool+test status: (10 min)
>
> a.  dovetail version 0.5
>
> b.  Testing pod resources
>
> 2)  Docs, including the test case requirement patch
> https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/38763/1  -(10 min)
>
> 3)  Overall status review and plan for the remaining milestones.  (40
> min) As the project is getting into shape, it’s good time for us to map out
> the remaining milestones and time table.
>
>
>
> As always, let us know if you have comments/suggestions.
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Wenjing
>
>
>
> ___
> opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
> opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
>
>


-- 
***
*Lincoln Lavoie*
Senior Engi

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

[Christopher Price]

Hi Hongbo,

Thanks, I’ve seen the information on the wiki.
I guess the questions I have relates more to:  Once we have the tool in a ready 
state, do we have a plan to validate it against volunteer commercial systems 
prior to having the TSC vote and making it generally available?  I didn’t see 
that information on the wiki page, maybe I missed it?

/ Chris

From: Tianhongbo <hongbo.tianhon...@huawei.com>
Date: Friday, 11 August 2017 at 11:05
To: Christopher Price <christopher.pr...@ericsson.com>, TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV 
<opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: RE: [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

Hi Chris:

Here is the page for recoding the history of this. We can discuss further.

https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/dovetail/Running+history+for+the+dovetail+tool

Best regards

hongbo

From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Christopher 
Price
Sent: 2017年8月11日 16:55
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

Hi Guys,

Do we have a time-plan for the remaining work?

I see we still have a lot of documentation work to do and the test cases are in 
flux, but we have other things to do as well.

-  Do we intend to test/validate the documentation in any way with 
community scenario’s prior to merging it?

o   Do we have people, resources and time-plans for that?

-  Will we arrange to test the toolchain against volunteer commercial 
systems in labs prior to making it available for use?

o   Same as above; people, resources, time-plans?

I can also see the links are all pointing to “artifact.opnfv.org” which is not 
I assume where we intend to publish the documentation.

Would be good to see how these items line up during the status review and 
remaining milestones discussion.

/ Chris


From: 
<opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>>
 on behalf of Trevor Cooper 
<trevor.coo...@intel.com<mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com>>
Date: Friday, 11 August 2017 at 09:29
To: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV 
<opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

Thanks Wenjing. I have updated the docs tracking page, lets review this for 
accuracy and highlight where reviews are most needed 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/dovetail/Dovetail+Documentation+for+Review …

/Trevor


From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>
 [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Wenjing Chu
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 9:14 AM
To: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV 
<opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>>
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

Hi Dovetailers,

Proposed agenda for this week’s call on Friday:


1)  Current tool+test status: (10 min)

a.  dovetail version 0.5

b.  Testing pod resources

2)  Docs, including the test case requirement patch 
https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/38763/1  -(10 min)

3)  Overall status review and plan for the remaining milestones.  (40 min) As 
the project is getting into shape, it’s good time for us to map out the 
remaining milestones and time table.

As always, let us know if you have comments/suggestions.

Regards
Wenjing

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

[Tianhongbo]

Hi Chris:

Here is the page for recoding the history of this. We can discuss further.

https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/dovetail/Running+history+for+the+dovetail+tool

Best regards

hongbo

From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Christopher 
Price
Sent: 2017年8月11日 16:55
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

Hi Guys,

Do we have a time-plan for the remaining work?

I see we still have a lot of documentation work to do and the test cases are in 
flux, but we have other things to do as well.

-  Do we intend to test/validate the documentation in any way with 
community scenario’s prior to merging it?

o   Do we have people, resources and time-plans for that?

-  Will we arrange to test the toolchain against volunteer commercial 
systems in labs prior to making it available for use?

o   Same as above; people, resources, time-plans?

I can also see the links are all pointing to “artifact.opnfv.org” which is not 
I assume where we intend to publish the documentation.

Would be good to see how these items line up during the status review and 
remaining milestones discussion.

/ Chris


From: 
<opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>>
 on behalf of Trevor Cooper 
<trevor.coo...@intel.com<mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com>>
Date: Friday, 11 August 2017 at 09:29
To: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV 
<opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

Thanks Wenjing. I have updated the docs tracking page, lets review this for 
accuracy and highlight where reviews are most needed 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/dovetail/Dovetail+Documentation+for+Review …

/Trevor


From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>
 [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Wenjing Chu
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 9:14 AM
To: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV 
<opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>>
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

Hi Dovetailers,

Proposed agenda for this week’s call on Friday:


1)  Current tool+test status: (10 min)

a.  dovetail version 0.5

b.  Testing pod resources

2)  Docs, including the test case requirement patch 
https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/38763/1  -(10 min)

3)  Overall status review and plan for the remaining milestones.  (40 min) As 
the project is getting into shape, it’s good time for us to map out the 
remaining milestones and time table.

As always, let us know if you have comments/suggestions.

Regards
Wenjing

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

[Christopher Price]

Hi Guys,

Do we have a time-plan for the remaining work?

I see we still have a lot of documentation work to do and the test cases are in 
flux, but we have other things to do as well.

-  Do we intend to test/validate the documentation in any way with 
community scenario’s prior to merging it?

oDo we have people, resources and time-plans for that?

-  Will we arrange to test the toolchain against volunteer commercial 
systems in labs prior to making it available for use?

oSame as above; people, resources, time-plans?

I can also see the links are all pointing to “artifact.opnfv.org” which is not 
I assume where we intend to publish the documentation.

Would be good to see how these items line up during the status review and 
remaining milestones discussion.

/ Chris

From: <opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org> on behalf of Trevor Cooper 
<trevor.coo...@intel.com>
Date: Friday, 11 August 2017 at 09:29
To: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

Thanks Wenjing. I have updated the docs tracking page, lets review this for 
accuracy and highlight where reviews are most needed 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/dovetail/Dovetail+Documentation+for+Review …

/Trevor


From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Wenjing Chu
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 9:14 AM
To: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

Hi Dovetailers,

Proposed agenda for this week’s call on Friday:


1)  Current tool+test status: (10 min)

a.  dovetail version 0.5

b.  Testing pod resources

2)  Docs, including the test case requirement patch 
https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/38763/1  -(10 min)

3)  Overall status review and plan for the remaining milestones.  (40 min) As 
the project is getting into shape, it’s good time for us to map out the 
remaining milestones and time table.

As always, let us know if you have comments/suggestions.

Regards
Wenjing

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

[Cooper, Trevor]

Thanks Wenjing. I have updated the docs tracking page, lets review this for 
accuracy and highlight where reviews are most needed 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/dovetail/Dovetail+Documentation+for+Review ...

/Trevor


From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Wenjing Chu
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 9:14 AM
To: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV 
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

Hi Dovetailers,

Proposed agenda for this week's call on Friday:


1)  Current tool+test status: (10 min)

a.   dovetail version 0.5

b.  Testing pod resources

2)  Docs, including the test case requirement patch 
https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/38763/1  -(10 min)

3)  Overall status review and plan for the remaining milestones.  (40 min) 
As the project is getting into shape, it's good time for us to map out the 
remaining milestones and time table.

As always, let us know if you have comments/suggestions.

Regards
Wenjing

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Weekly call agenda

[Georg Kunz]

Hi Wenjing,

Ah, yes, thanks for pointing that out and swapping the agenda topics.

Talk to you tomorrow!

Best regards
Georg

From: Wenjing Chu [mailto:wenjing@huawei.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 11:14 PM
To: Georg Kunz <georg.k...@ericsson.com>; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: RE: [dovetail] Weekly call agenda

Yes it's topic (2). Let me move it ahead as you suggested, and re-wording it a 
little to make it more clear. Thanks Georg.

Wenjing

Here:


  1.  2x one hour slots have been scheduled for design summit - Shall we add an 
hour or more of dedicated time to ETSI TST, operator/EUAG feedback, and, 
upstream/openstack-interop if people are available?
  2.  The questions raised during the TSC discussion (which will continue next 
Tuesday): scope in terms of considering more projects in Danube, mandatory vs 
optional, agreement needed from the TSC.
  3.  Any docs that need an urgent push to complete - give them some concerted 
effort.
  4.  Other topics inherited from the last week


From: Georg Kunz [mailto:georg.k...@ericsson.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 1:49 PM
To: Wenjing Chu <wenjing@huawei.com<mailto:wenjing@huawei.com>>; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: RE: [dovetail] Weekly call agenda

Hi Wenjing,

I'd like to put one more item on the agenda: I'd like to arrange and agree a 
timeslot for the information sharing session with the OpenStack interop folks. 
It would be great if we could briefly discuss that in the beginning of our 
meeting and then move to the other items (which presumably take quite some more 
time).

Thank you.

Georg

From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>
 [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Wenjing Chu
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 8:58 PM
To: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Weekly call agenda

Sorry I'm a little behind. Here is the agenda proposal for this Friday. Please 
add your comments.


  1.  The questions raised during the TSC discussion (which will continue next 
Tuesday): scope in terms of considering more projects in Danube, mandatory vs 
optional, agreement needed from the TSC.
  2.  2x one hour slots scheduled for design summit - add an hour of dedicated 
time to ETSI TST, operator/EUAG feedback, and, upstream/openstack if people are 
available?
  3.  Any docs that need an urgent push to complete - give them some concerted 
effort.
  4.  Other topics inherited from the last week

Thanks.
Wenjing

From: Wenjing Chu
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2017 2:12 PM
To: Wenjing Chu <wenjing@huawei.com<mailto:wenjing@huawei.com>>; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: RE: [dovetail] Weekly call agenda

Thanks everyone on the call. We only had time to cover the first two items 
today.
I took an action item to upload PDF of the docs and URLs to all corresponding 
gerrit patches in a single wiki page here:
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/dovetail/Dovetail+Documentation+for+Review

Trevor,
When you get around to make the update to the addendum, I will try to update it 
right away.
Anyone else does updates before next Tuesday, please also shoot me an email if 
possible. Thanks.

I tried to be careful but this is manual, if you spot errors, let me know. 
Thanks.

Wenjing

From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>
 [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Wenjing Chu
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 11:21 PM
To: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Weekly call agenda


Hi Dovetailers,

Please chime in if the following agenda looks good. It's packed as always, so 
suggestions of order also welcome. Thanks.


  *   Preparation for TSC review on 5/30
  *   Review the Danube addendum
  *   QA dovetail

 *   Vendor lab testing - needs volunteers to sign up beta testers - update
 *   Stability test criteria

  *   Tagging / release schemes
  *   Invited speakers: openstack interop wg, ETSI TST
  *   Design summit topics: E release, ETSI TST, new test areas, user/operator 
involvements
  *   From Trevor's email last week, not yet included above

 *   H/w resources for Dovetail
 *   Test catalog domains relevant to compliance

  *   PTL election

Regards
Wenjing
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Weekly call agenda

[Wenjing Chu]

Yes it's topic (2). Let me move it ahead as you suggested, and re-wording it a 
little to make it more clear. Thanks Georg.

Wenjing

Here:

1)  2x one hour slots have been scheduled for design summit - Shall we add 
an hour or more of dedicated time to ETSI TST, operator/EUAG feedback, and, 
upstream/openstack-interop if people are available?
2)  The questions raised during the TSC discussion (which will continue 
next Tuesday): scope in terms of considering more projects in Danube, mandatory 
vs optional, agreement needed from the TSC.
3)  Any docs that need an urgent push to complete - give them some 
concerted effort.
4)  Other topics inherited from the last week


From: Georg Kunz [mailto:georg.k...@ericsson.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 1:49 PM
To: Wenjing Chu <wenjing@huawei.com>; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: RE: [dovetail] Weekly call agenda

Hi Wenjing,

I'd like to put one more item on the agenda: I'd like to arrange and agree a 
timeslot for the information sharing session with the OpenStack interop folks. 
It would be great if we could briefly discuss that in the beginning of our 
meeting and then move to the other items (which presumably take quite some more 
time).

Thank you.

Georg

From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>
 [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Wenjing Chu
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 8:58 PM
To: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Weekly call agenda

Sorry I'm a little behind. Here is the agenda proposal for this Friday. Please 
add your comments.

1)  The questions raised during the TSC discussion (which will continue 
next Tuesday): scope in terms of considering more projects in Danube, mandatory 
vs optional, agreement needed from the TSC.
2)  2x one hour slots scheduled for design summit - add an hour of 
dedicated time to ETSI TST, operator/EUAG feedback, and, upstream/openstack if 
people are available?
3)  Any docs that need an urgent push to complete - give them some 
concerted effort.
4)  Other topics inherited from the last week

Thanks.
Wenjing

From: Wenjing Chu
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2017 2:12 PM
To: Wenjing Chu <wenjing@huawei.com<mailto:wenjing@huawei.com>>; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: RE: [dovetail] Weekly call agenda

Thanks everyone on the call. We only had time to cover the first two items 
today.
I took an action item to upload PDF of the docs and URLs to all corresponding 
gerrit patches in a single wiki page here:
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/dovetail/Dovetail+Documentation+for+Review

Trevor,
When you get around to make the update to the addendum, I will try to update it 
right away.
Anyone else does updates before next Tuesday, please also shoot me an email if 
possible. Thanks.

I tried to be careful but this is manual, if you spot errors, let me know. 
Thanks.

Wenjing

From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>
 [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Wenjing Chu
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 11:21 PM
To: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Weekly call agenda


Hi Dovetailers,

Please chime in if the following agenda looks good. It's packed as always, so 
suggestions of order also welcome. Thanks.

-Preparation for TSC review on 5/30
-Review the Danube addendum
-QA dovetail
o   Vendor lab testing - needs volunteers to sign up beta testers - update
o   Stability test criteria
-Tagging / release schemes
-Invited speakers: openstack interop wg, ETSI TST
-Design summit topics: E release, ETSI TST, new test areas, 
user/operator involvements
-From Trevor's email last week, not yet included above
o   H/w resources for Dovetail
o   Test catalog domains relevant to compliance
-PTL election

Regards
Wenjing
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Weekly call agenda

[Georg Kunz]

Hi Wenjing,

I'd like to put one more item on the agenda: I'd like to arrange and agree a 
timeslot for the information sharing session with the OpenStack interop folks. 
It would be great if we could briefly discuss that in the beginning of our 
meeting and then move to the other items (which presumably take quite some more 
time).

Thank you.

Georg

From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Wenjing Chu
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 8:58 PM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Weekly call agenda

Sorry I'm a little behind. Here is the agenda proposal for this Friday. Please 
add your comments.


  1.  The questions raised during the TSC discussion (which will continue next 
Tuesday): scope in terms of considering more projects in Danube, mandatory vs 
optional, agreement needed from the TSC.
  2.  2x one hour slots scheduled for design summit - add an hour of dedicated 
time to ETSI TST, operator/EUAG feedback, and, upstream/openstack if people are 
available?
  3.  Any docs that need an urgent push to complete - give them some concerted 
effort.
  4.  Other topics inherited from the last week

Thanks.
Wenjing

From: Wenjing Chu
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2017 2:12 PM
To: Wenjing Chu <wenjing@huawei.com<mailto:wenjing@huawei.com>>; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: RE: [dovetail] Weekly call agenda

Thanks everyone on the call. We only had time to cover the first two items 
today.
I took an action item to upload PDF of the docs and URLs to all corresponding 
gerrit patches in a single wiki page here:
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/dovetail/Dovetail+Documentation+for+Review

Trevor,
When you get around to make the update to the addendum, I will try to update it 
right away.
Anyone else does updates before next Tuesday, please also shoot me an email if 
possible. Thanks.

I tried to be careful but this is manual, if you spot errors, let me know. 
Thanks.

Wenjing

From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>
 [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Wenjing Chu
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 11:21 PM
To: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Weekly call agenda


Hi Dovetailers,

Please chime in if the following agenda looks good. It's packed as always, so 
suggestions of order also welcome. Thanks.


  *   Preparation for TSC review on 5/30
  *   Review the Danube addendum
  *   QA dovetail

 *   Vendor lab testing - needs volunteers to sign up beta testers - update
 *   Stability test criteria

  *   Tagging / release schemes
  *   Invited speakers: openstack interop wg, ETSI TST
  *   Design summit topics: E release, ETSI TST, new test areas, user/operator 
involvements
  *   From Trevor's email last week, not yet included above

 *   H/w resources for Dovetail
 *   Test catalog domains relevant to compliance

  *   PTL election

Regards
Wenjing
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Weekly call agenda

[Wenjing Chu]

Sorry I'm a little behind. Here is the agenda proposal for this Friday. Please 
add your comments.


1)  The questions raised during the TSC discussion (which will continue 
next Tuesday): scope in terms of considering more projects in Danube, mandatory 
vs optional, agreement needed from the TSC.

2)  2x one hour slots scheduled for design summit - add an hour of 
dedicated time to ETSI TST, operator/EUAG feedback, and, upstream/openstack if 
people are available?

3)  Any docs that need an urgent push to complete - give them some 
concerted effort.

4)  Other topics inherited from the last week

Thanks.
Wenjing

From: Wenjing Chu
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2017 2:12 PM
To: Wenjing Chu ; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: RE: [dovetail] Weekly call agenda

Thanks everyone on the call. We only had time to cover the first two items 
today.
I took an action item to upload PDF of the docs and URLs to all corresponding 
gerrit patches in a single wiki page here:
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/dovetail/Dovetail+Documentation+for+Review

Trevor,
When you get around to make the update to the addendum, I will try to update it 
right away.
Anyone else does updates before next Tuesday, please also shoot me an email if 
possible. Thanks.

I tried to be careful but this is manual, if you spot errors, let me know. 
Thanks.

Wenjing

From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
 [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Wenjing Chu
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 11:21 PM
To: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Weekly call agenda


Hi Dovetailers,

Please chime in if the following agenda looks good. It's packed as always, so 
suggestions of order also welcome. Thanks.


-Preparation for TSC review on 5/30

-Review the Danube addendum

-QA dovetail

o   Vendor lab testing - needs volunteers to sign up beta testers - update

o   Stability test criteria

-Tagging / release schemes

-Invited speakers: openstack interop wg, ETSI TST

-Design summit topics: E release, ETSI TST, new test areas, 
user/operator involvements

-From Trevor's email last week, not yet included above

o   H/w resources for Dovetail

o   Test catalog domains relevant to compliance

-PTL election

Regards
Wenjing
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Weekly call agenda

[Wenjing Chu]

Thanks everyone on the call. We only had time to cover the first two items 
today.
I took an action item to upload PDF of the docs and URLs to all corresponding 
gerrit patches in a single wiki page here:
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/dovetail/Dovetail+Documentation+for+Review

Trevor,
When you get around to make the update to the addendum, I will try to update it 
right away.
Anyone else does updates before next Tuesday, please also shoot me an email if 
possible. Thanks.

I tried to be careful but this is manual, if you spot errors, let me know. 
Thanks.

Wenjing

From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Wenjing Chu
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 11:21 PM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Weekly call agenda


Hi Dovetailers,

Please chime in if the following agenda looks good. It's packed as always, so 
suggestions of order also welcome. Thanks.


-Preparation for TSC review on 5/30

-Review the Danube addendum

-QA dovetail

o   Vendor lab testing - needs volunteers to sign up beta testers - update

o   Stability test criteria

-Tagging / release schemes

-Invited speakers: openstack interop wg, ETSI TST

-Design summit topics: E release, ETSI TST, new test areas, 
user/operator involvements

-From Trevor's email last week, not yet included above

o   H/w resources for Dovetail

o   Test catalog domains relevant to compliance

-PTL election

Regards
Wenjing
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss