Re: Pax Exam 4.12.0 release?

[Jean-Baptiste Onofré]

I will dig around that, good point.

Regards
JB

On 20/06/2019 11:15, 'Achim Nierbeck' via OPS4J wrote:
> Hi,
>
> one thing worries me here.
> Obviously Sonatype closed the snapshot repo for ops4j.
> Do we know why this happened?
> Have there been any information about this prior?
>
> thanks, Achim
>
>
> Am Do., 20. Juni 2019 um 10:48 Uhr schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> mailto:jeanbaptiste.ono...@gmail.com>>:
>
> Hi Jürgen,
>
> I will check the status and eventually cut the release.
>
> I keep you posted.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 20/06/2019 10:48, Jürgen Schmid wrote:
>> Hi laeubi,
>>
>> just wanted to check the current release status.
>> Unfortunately the ops4j Repositories were shut down
>> (https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/ops4j-snapshots)
>> and the Snapshot artifacts including the new RCP Eclipse
>> container feature are no more available. Due to the fact we are
>> using the version in production for our integration tests since
>> more than one year with just some minor issues we had to do a
>> fork and deploy the artifacts into our own nexus.
>>
>> In my opinion, you all did a great job getting pax exam to
>> support rcp testing and it would be sad if the feature will never
>> get released and snapshots are unavailable anymore.
>> I know, there are tests missing, but i think it would be a great
>> benefit releasing that feature. Mark that uncovered features as
>> experimental and ship it. Afterwards we can do pull requests to
>> eliminate issues from the community. 
>>
>> The issue popped up again because the ExamSystem streams the
>> bundle into a temporary folder and never cleans up them. I am
>> working on a patch to recognize the working directory to avoid
>> risking disk space on our build agents.
>>
>>
>>
>> Am Mittwoch, 2. Mai 2018 08:52:26 UTC+2 schrieb laeubi:
>>
>> The problem is that most code uses some kind of external
>> resources
>> (bundle, product/feature files and so on) what makes it hard
>> to write
>> real unit test.
>> So I'm currently evaluate how I can make a good test without
>> rely on
>> external (web) resources to much.
>>
>> Beside that, it would be good if you might can review the
>> documentation
>> at [1], Ive asked a while back in this group but have not
>> goten any
>> feedback on it yet.
>>
>> So if no one vetoes and you think the doku is comprehensive
>> enough for
>> someone to start with (if not feel free to enhance it of
>> course), I
>> think we can merge the PR and make a release.
>>
>>
>> 
>> [1]https://ops4j1.jira.com/wiki/spaces/PAXEXAM4/pages/167018497/Eclipse+PDE-Container
>>
>>
>> Am 01.05.2018 um 23:18 schrieb Jürgen Schmid:
>> > Hi Christoph,
>> >
>> > we are already using 5.0.0-Snapshot from ops4j repository.
>> > We started using the eclipse container with two existing
>> pde product configurations for integration tests and for
>> debugging a pde application within intellij instead of
>> eclipse successfully. (A big step forward!)
>> > Thanks for your contribution, are there some hot spots
>> which needs to be unit tested?
>> >
>> > Best, J
>> >
>> >> On 1. May 2018, at 19:25, 'Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J
>>  wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi Jürgen,
>> >>
>> >> in fact there is only some unit-test missing (i'm
>> currently a little bit short of time), if you like you can
>> test the snapshot-5.0 version or build the corresponding
>> branch of the 4.12 line and do some testing, let me know if
>> you need help or there is anything missing.
>> >>
>> >> Would be cool to here back from you.
>> >>
>> >>> Am 01.05.2018 um 10:42 schrieb Jürgen Schmid:
>> >>> Are there any updates when the eclipse container will be
>> available as a release version?
>> >>> Are there any open tasks?
>> >>> This container would match perfectly in our production
>> environment for testing pde.
>>
>> -- 
>> -- 
>> --
>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com
>> 
>>
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>> Google Groups "OPS4J" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>> send an email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>> .
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/c5df3468-6d05-4310-a696-c1ce831cfbbf%40googlegroups.com
>> 
>> 

Re: Pax Exam 4.12.0 release?

['Achim Nierbeck' via OPS4J]

Hi,

one thing worries me here.
Obviously Sonatype closed the snapshot repo for ops4j.
Do we know why this happened?
Have there been any information about this prior?

thanks, Achim


Am Do., 20. Juni 2019 um 10:48 Uhr schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
jeanbaptiste.ono...@gmail.com>:

> Hi Jürgen,
>
> I will check the status and eventually cut the release.
>
> I keep you posted.
>
> Regards
> JB
> On 20/06/2019 10:48, Jürgen Schmid wrote:
>
> Hi laeubi,
>
> just wanted to check the current release status.
> Unfortunately the ops4j Repositories were shut down (
> https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/ops4j-snapshots) and the
> Snapshot artifacts including the new RCP Eclipse container feature are no
> more available. Due to the fact we are using the version in production for
> our integration tests since more than one year with just some minor issues
> we had to do a fork and deploy the artifacts into our own nexus.
>
> In my opinion, you all did a great job getting pax exam to support rcp
> testing and it would be sad if the feature will never get released and
> snapshots are unavailable anymore.
> I know, there are tests missing, but i think it would be a great benefit
> releasing that feature. Mark that uncovered features as experimental and
> ship it. Afterwards we can do pull requests to eliminate issues from the
> community.
>
> The issue popped up again because the ExamSystem streams the bundle into a
> temporary folder and never cleans up them. I am working on a patch to
> recognize the working directory to avoid risking disk space on our build
> agents.
>
>
>
> Am Mittwoch, 2. Mai 2018 08:52:26 UTC+2 schrieb laeubi:
>>
>> The problem is that most code uses some kind of external resources
>> (bundle, product/feature files and so on) what makes it hard to write
>> real unit test.
>> So I'm currently evaluate how I can make a good test without rely on
>> external (web) resources to much.
>>
>> Beside that, it would be good if you might can review the documentation
>> at [1], Ive asked a while back in this group but have not goten any
>> feedback on it yet.
>>
>> So if no one vetoes and you think the doku is comprehensive enough for
>> someone to start with (if not feel free to enhance it of course), I
>> think we can merge the PR and make a release.
>>
>>
>> [1]
>> https://ops4j1.jira.com/wiki/spaces/PAXEXAM4/pages/167018497/Eclipse+PDE-Container
>>
>> Am 01.05.2018 um 23:18 schrieb Jürgen Schmid:
>> > Hi Christoph,
>> >
>> > we are already using 5.0.0-Snapshot from ops4j repository.
>> > We started using the eclipse container with two existing pde product
>> configurations for integration tests and for debugging a pde application
>> within intellij instead of eclipse successfully. (A big step forward!)
>> > Thanks for your contribution, are there some hot spots which needs to
>> be unit tested?
>> >
>> > Best, J
>> >
>> >> On 1. May 2018, at 19:25, 'Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J <
>> op...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi Jürgen,
>> >>
>> >> in fact there is only some unit-test missing (i'm currently a little
>> bit short of time), if you like you can test the snapshot-5.0 version or
>> build the corresponding branch of the 4.12 line and do some testing, let me
>> know if you need help or there is anything missing.
>> >>
>> >> Would be cool to here back from you.
>> >>
>> >>> Am 01.05.2018 um 10:42 schrieb Jürgen Schmid:
>> >>> Are there any updates when the eclipse container will be available as
>> a release version?
>> >>> Are there any open tasks?
>> >>> This container would match perfectly in our production environment
>> for testing pde.
>>
> --
> --
> --
> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "OPS4J" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/c5df3468-6d05-4310-a696-c1ce831cfbbf%40googlegroups.com
> 
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
> --
> --
> --
> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "OPS4J" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/57098ed5-eb45-97ba-1aaa-8ad7d377243d%40gmail.com
> 
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>


-- 

Apache Member
Apache Karaf  Committer & PMC

Re: Pax Exam 4.12.0 release?

[Jean-Baptiste Onofré]

Hi Jürgen,

I will check the status and eventually cut the release.

I keep you posted.

Regards
JB

On 20/06/2019 10:48, Jürgen Schmid wrote:
> Hi laeubi,
>
> just wanted to check the current release status.
> Unfortunately the ops4j Repositories were shut down
> (https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/ops4j-snapshots) and
> the Snapshot artifacts including the new RCP Eclipse container feature
> are no more available. Due to the fact we are using the version in
> production for our integration tests since more than one year with
> just some minor issues we had to do a fork and deploy the artifacts
> into our own nexus.
>
> In my opinion, you all did a great job getting pax exam to support rcp
> testing and it would be sad if the feature will never get released and
> snapshots are unavailable anymore.
> I know, there are tests missing, but i think it would be a great
> benefit releasing that feature. Mark that uncovered features as
> experimental and ship it. Afterwards we can do pull requests to
> eliminate issues from the community. 
>
> The issue popped up again because the ExamSystem streams the bundle
> into a temporary folder and never cleans up them. I am working on a
> patch to recognize the working directory to avoid risking disk space
> on our build agents.
>
>
>
> Am Mittwoch, 2. Mai 2018 08:52:26 UTC+2 schrieb laeubi:
>
> The problem is that most code uses some kind of external resources
> (bundle, product/feature files and so on) what makes it hard to write
> real unit test.
> So I'm currently evaluate how I can make a good test without rely on
> external (web) resources to much.
>
> Beside that, it would be good if you might can review the
> documentation
> at [1], Ive asked a while back in this group but have not goten any
> feedback on it yet.
>
> So if no one vetoes and you think the doku is comprehensive enough
> for
> someone to start with (if not feel free to enhance it of course), I
> think we can merge the PR and make a release.
>
>
> 
> [1]https://ops4j1.jira.com/wiki/spaces/PAXEXAM4/pages/167018497/Eclipse+PDE-Container
> 
> 
>
>
> Am 01.05.2018 um 23:18 schrieb Jürgen Schmid:
> > Hi Christoph,
> >
> > we are already using 5.0.0-Snapshot from ops4j repository.
> > We started using the eclipse container with two existing pde
> product configurations for integration tests and for debugging a
> pde application within intellij instead of eclipse successfully.
> (A big step forward!)
> > Thanks for your contribution, are there some hot spots which
> needs to be unit tested?
> >
> > Best, J
> >
> >> On 1. May 2018, at 19:25, 'Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Jürgen,
> >>
> >> in fact there is only some unit-test missing (i'm currently a
> little bit short of time), if you like you can test the
> snapshot-5.0 version or build the corresponding branch of the 4.12
> line and do some testing, let me know if you need help or there is
> anything missing.
> >>
> >> Would be cool to here back from you.
> >>
> >>> Am 01.05.2018 um 10:42 schrieb Jürgen Schmid:
> >>> Are there any updates when the eclipse container will be
> available as a release version?
> >>> Are there any open tasks?
> >>> This container would match perfectly in our production
> environment for testing pde.
>
> -- 
> -- 
> --
> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "OPS4J" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> .
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/c5df3468-6d05-4310-a696-c1ce831cfbbf%40googlegroups.com
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
-- 
--
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/57098ed5-eb45-97ba-1aaa-8ad7d377243d%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Pax Exam 4.12.0 release?

[Jürgen Schmid]

Hi laeubi,

just wanted to check the current release status.
Unfortunately the ops4j Repositories were shut down (
https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/ops4j-snapshots) and the 
Snapshot artifacts including the new RCP Eclipse container feature are no 
more available. Due to the fact we are using the version in production for 
our integration tests since more than one year with just some minor issues 
we had to do a fork and deploy the artifacts into our own nexus.

In my opinion, you all did a great job getting pax exam to support rcp 
testing and it would be sad if the feature will never get released and 
snapshots are unavailable anymore.
I know, there are tests missing, but i think it would be a great benefit 
releasing that feature. Mark that uncovered features as experimental and 
ship it. Afterwards we can do pull requests to eliminate issues from the 
community. 

The issue popped up again because the ExamSystem streams the bundle into a 
temporary folder and never cleans up them. I am working on a patch to 
recognize the working directory to avoid risking disk space on our build 
agents.



Am Mittwoch, 2. Mai 2018 08:52:26 UTC+2 schrieb laeubi:
>
> The problem is that most code uses some kind of external resources 
> (bundle, product/feature files and so on) what makes it hard to write 
> real unit test. 
> So I'm currently evaluate how I can make a good test without rely on 
> external (web) resources to much. 
>
> Beside that, it would be good if you might can review the documentation 
> at [1], Ive asked a while back in this group but have not goten any 
> feedback on it yet. 
>
> So if no one vetoes and you think the doku is comprehensive enough for 
> someone to start with (if not feel free to enhance it of course), I 
> think we can merge the PR and make a release. 
>
>
> [1]
> https://ops4j1.jira.com/wiki/spaces/PAXEXAM4/pages/167018497/Eclipse+PDE-Container
>  
>
> Am 01.05.2018 um 23:18 schrieb Jürgen Schmid: 
> > Hi Christoph, 
> > 
> > we are already using 5.0.0-Snapshot from ops4j repository. 
> > We started using the eclipse container with two existing pde product 
> configurations for integration tests and for debugging a pde application 
> within intellij instead of eclipse successfully. (A big step forward!) 
> > Thanks for your contribution, are there some hot spots which needs to be 
> unit tested? 
> > 
> > Best, J 
> > 
> >> On 1. May 2018, at 19:25, 'Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J <
> op...@googlegroups.com > wrote: 
> >> 
> >> Hi Jürgen, 
> >> 
> >> in fact there is only some unit-test missing (i'm currently a little 
> bit short of time), if you like you can test the snapshot-5.0 version or 
> build the corresponding branch of the 4.12 line and do some testing, let me 
> know if you need help or there is anything missing. 
> >> 
> >> Would be cool to here back from you. 
> >> 
> >>> Am 01.05.2018 um 10:42 schrieb Jürgen Schmid: 
> >>> Are there any updates when the eclipse container will be available as 
> a release version? 
> >>> Are there any open tasks? 
> >>> This container would match perfectly in our production environment for 
> testing pde. 
>

-- 
-- 
--
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/c5df3468-6d05-4310-a696-c1ce831cfbbf%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Pax Exam 4.12.0 release?

[Jürgen Schmid]

Hi Christoph,

we are already using 5.0.0-Snapshot from ops4j repository.
We started using the eclipse container with two existing pde product 
configurations for integration tests and for debugging a pde application within 
intellij instead of eclipse successfully. (A big step forward!)
Thanks for your contribution, are there some hot spots which needs to be unit 
tested?

Best, J

> On 1. May 2018, at 19:25, 'Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J 
>  wrote:
> 
> Hi Jürgen,
> 
> in fact there is only some unit-test missing (i'm currently a little bit 
> short of time), if you like you can test the snapshot-5.0 version or build 
> the corresponding branch of the 4.12 line and do some testing, let me know if 
> you need help or there is anything missing.
> 
> Would be cool to here back from you.
> 
>> Am 01.05.2018 um 10:42 schrieb Jürgen Schmid:
>> Are there any updates when the eclipse container will be available as a 
>> release version?
>> Are there any open tasks?
>> This container would match perfectly in our production environment for 
>> testing pde.
>> 
> 
> -- 
> -- 
> --
> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com
> 
> --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "OPS4J" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
-- 
--
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Pax Exam 4.12.0 release?

['Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J]

I added documentation here: 
https://ops4j1.jira.com/wiki/spaces/PAXEXAM4/pages/167018497/Eclipse+PDE-Container

and updated the issues under https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXEXAM-832

@JB or @Harald can you review the docu if something is unclear/missing?

Am 24.11.2017 um 10:03 schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré:

Hi Christoph,

I think we are almost good for 4.12.0 release.

Regards
JB


On 11/24/2017 10:00 AM, 'Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J wrote:

Hi,

I'd like to know what is left fro the 4.12.0 relase?
I created a pull-request[1] for the Eclipse-Container feature (merged 
from the current 5.x development), since this just adds a new 
container there won't be any side effects, but I wonder if there is 
any work on-going before we can release a new version?


So if nothing else is on the way I would suggest to merge the 
pull-request and prepare a release so the eclipse container can be 
used by ppl from an official stable release.


[1] https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.exam2/pull/73





--
--
--
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OPS4J" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Pax Exam 4.12.0 release?

['Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J]

Hi Harald,

the use-cases are described in the Epic (1) and corresponding stories. 
It has become quite alot of code, thats right but since it all lives 
inside an own module the risk of including it is very small because it 
itroduce no dependencies to the rest of pax-exam code beside the public API.


I'm currently working on a documentation about this (2), and will place 
it at the wiki the under 
https://ops4j1.jira.com/wiki/spaces/PAXEXAM4/pages/54263861/Test+Containers 
if thats fine.


I also have some test (3) and examples but all of thos currently need 
network-acces to external sites that I try to remove they can run 
without addition network-acces (problem is that most eclipse artifacts 
are not avaiable via maven so I have to create them on my own).


So I will mark the test+documentation issues as for version 4.12 now so 
we can make a release when those are done?



(1) https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXEXAM-832
(2) https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXEXAM-840
(3) https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXEXAM-855

Am 02.12.2017 um 15:25 schrieb Harald Wellmann:

Hi Christoph,

This is a quite a massive addition. I don't see any tests or samples in 
the PR, nor is there any documentation on how to use the new container 
and what the use cases really are.


IMHO both tests and docs are a prerequisite for including this in any 
release, be it 4.x or 5.x.


Regards,
Harald


Am 24.11.2017 um 10:07 schrieb 'Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J:
That sounds great, do you think you can make a short review to verify 
that there are no sideeffects for other modules and then merge the 
pull request?


I'll then update the coresponding JIRA issues and prepare the 
documentation for the new container in the wiki.


Am 24.11.2017 um 10:03 schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré:

Hi Christoph,

I think we are almost good for 4.12.0 release.

Regards
JB


On 11/24/2017 10:00 AM, 'Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J wrote:

Hi,

I'd like to know what is left fro the 4.12.0 relase?
I created a pull-request[1] for the Eclipse-Container feature 
(merged from the current 5.x development), since this just adds a 
new container there won't be any side effects, but I wonder if there 
is any work on-going before we can release a new version?


So if nothing else is on the way I would suggest to merge the 
pull-request and prepare a release so the eclipse container can be 
used by ppl from an official stable release.


[1] https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.exam2/pull/73









--
--
--
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OPS4J" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Pax Exam 4.12.0 release?

[Harald Wellmann]

Hi Christoph,

This is a quite a massive addition. I don't see any tests or samples in 
the PR, nor is there any documentation on how to use the new container 
and what the use cases really are.


IMHO both tests and docs are a prerequisite for including this in any 
release, be it 4.x or 5.x.


Regards,
Harald


Am 24.11.2017 um 10:07 schrieb 'Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J:
That sounds great, do you think you can make a short review to verify 
that there are no sideeffects for other modules and then merge the pull 
request?


I'll then update the coresponding JIRA issues and prepare the 
documentation for the new container in the wiki.


Am 24.11.2017 um 10:03 schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré:

Hi Christoph,

I think we are almost good for 4.12.0 release.

Regards
JB


On 11/24/2017 10:00 AM, 'Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J wrote:

Hi,

I'd like to know what is left fro the 4.12.0 relase?
I created a pull-request[1] for the Eclipse-Container feature (merged 
from the current 5.x development), since this just adds a new 
container there won't be any side effects, but I wonder if there is 
any work on-going before we can release a new version?


So if nothing else is on the way I would suggest to merge the 
pull-request and prepare a release so the eclipse container can be 
used by ppl from an official stable release.


[1] https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.exam2/pull/73







--
--
--
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OPS4J" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Pax Exam 4.12.0 release?

[Jean-Baptiste Onofré]

Hi Christoph,

I think we are almost good for 4.12.0 release.

Regards
JB


On 11/24/2017 10:00 AM, 'Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J wrote:

Hi,

I'd like to know what is left fro the 4.12.0 relase?
I created a pull-request[1] for the Eclipse-Container feature (merged from the 
current 5.x development), since this just adds a new container there won't be 
any side effects, but I wonder if there is any work on-going before we can 
release a new version?


So if nothing else is on the way I would suggest to merge the pull-request and 
prepare a release so the eclipse container can be used by ppl from an official 
stable release.


[1] https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.exam2/pull/73



--
--
--
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OPS4J" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Pax Exam 4.12.0 release?

['Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J]

Hi,

I'd like to know what is left fro the 4.12.0 relase?
I created a pull-request[1] for the Eclipse-Container feature (merged 
from the current 5.x development), since this just adds a new container 
there won't be any side effects, but I wonder if there is any work 
on-going before we can release a new version?


So if nothing else is on the way I would suggest to merge the 
pull-request and prepare a release so the eclipse container can be used 
by ppl from an official stable release.


[1] https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.exam2/pull/73

--
--
--
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OPS4J" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.