RE: LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE

2003-06-24 Thread DENNIS WILLIAMS
Seema
   Oracle version?
   Have you studied the paper How to Stop Defragmenting . . . so you
understand how to configure your LMT?
   Overall, my results with LMT have been great. Oracle says eventually we
will all be LMT.

Dennis Williams
DBA, 80%OCP, 100% DBA
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 10:59 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Hi,

What is the group view if I will go with  locally managed tablespaces?
thx
-seema

_
Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Seema Singh
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: DENNIS WILLIAMS
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


RE: LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE

2003-06-24 Thread Richard Ji
I will say, welcome to the club.

-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 11:59 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Hi,

What is the group view if I will go with  locally managed tablespaces?
thx
-seema

_
Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Seema Singh
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Richard Ji
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


Re: LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE

2003-06-24 Thread Rachel Carmichael
group view?

if you mean, where can you find the information about the tablespace
and datafiles, that is in the same set of views as dictionary-managed
tablespaces:

dba_tablespaces
dba_data_files

if that's not what you meant... please clarify what it is that you are
looking for


--- Seema Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi,
 
 What is the group view if I will go with  locally managed
 tablespaces?
 thx
 -seema
 
 _
 Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. 
 http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
 
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
 -- 
 Author: Seema Singh
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
 San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
 -
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


__
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Rachel Carmichael
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


RE: LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE

2003-06-24 Thread Regis Biassala
and that including the PEOPLESOFT guys too...

-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 5:45 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Seema
   Oracle version?
   Have you studied the paper How to Stop Defragmenting . . . so you
understand how to configure your LMT?
   Overall, my results with LMT have been great. Oracle says eventually we
will all be LMT.

Dennis Williams
DBA, 80%OCP, 100% DBA
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 10:59 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Hi,

What is the group view if I will go with  locally managed tablespaces?
thx
-seema

_
Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Seema Singh
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: DENNIS WILLIAMS
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
*
This electronic transmission is strictly confidential and intended solely
for the addressee. It may contain information which is covered by legal,
professional or other privilege. If you are not the intended addressee,
you must not disclose, copy or take any action in reliance of this
transmission. If you have received this transmission in error, 
please notify the sender as soon as possible.

This footnote also confirms that this message has been swept
for computer viruses.
**

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Regis Biassala
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


RE: LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE

2003-06-24 Thread Seema Singh
8.1.7.4 and 9i


From: DENNIS WILLIAMS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 08:44:39 -0800
Seema
   Oracle version?
   Have you studied the paper How to Stop Defragmenting . . . so you
understand how to configure your LMT?
   Overall, my results with LMT have been great. Oracle says eventually we
will all be LMT.
Dennis Williams
DBA, 80%OCP, 100% DBA
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 10:59 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Hi,

What is the group view if I will go with  locally managed tablespaces?
thx
-seema
_
Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: Seema Singh
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: DENNIS WILLIAMS
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
_
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online  
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963

--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: Seema Singh
 INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


RE: LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE

2003-06-24 Thread Gogala, Mladen
What is the group view on your going with the locally managed tablespaces?
Well, go ahead, make my data!

Mladen Gogala
Oracle DBA
Phone:(203) 459-6855
Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 11:59 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Hi,

What is the group view if I will go with  locally managed tablespaces?
thx
-seema

_
Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Seema Singh
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Gogala, Mladen
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


RE: LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE

2003-06-24 Thread Shaibal Talukder
I am on 9iR2 , AIX 5L. I have all my tablespaces as locally managed 
including system. No problem yet.

Shaibal Talukder
Discover Financial Services
Oracle Engineering
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

From: Seema Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 09:19:48 -0800
8.1.7.4 and 9i


From: DENNIS WILLIAMS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 08:44:39 -0800
Seema
   Oracle version?
   Have you studied the paper How to Stop Defragmenting . . . so you
understand how to configure your LMT?
   Overall, my results with LMT have been great. Oracle says eventually 
we
will all be LMT.

Dennis Williams
DBA, 80%OCP, 100% DBA
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 10:59 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Hi,

What is the group view if I will go with  locally managed tablespaces?
thx
-seema
_
Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: Seema Singh
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: DENNIS WILLIAMS
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
_
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online  
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963

--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: Seema Singh
 INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
_
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail

--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: Shaibal Talukder
 INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


RE: LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE

2002-11-08 Thread Leonard, George
If you are tyring to use a LM temporary tablespace how about creating a
second tablespace, temporary that is lcoally managed and then slowly alter
the user, maybe even try and doa  little test with a  queryt hat will sue
temporary space, run the query with one user on the normal dict man
tablespace and the second user on the LM  nd see if you can convince your
boss now as the best time,

They like to see that it works. If it does then they will sya yes sooner.

George

George Leonard
Oracle Database Administrator
Dimension Data (Pty) Ltd
(Reg. No. 1987/006597/07)
Tel: (+27 11) 575 0573
Fax: (+27 11) 576 0573
E-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web:   http://www.didata.co.za
 
You Have The Obligation to Inform One Honestly of the risk, And As a Person
You Are Committed to Educate Yourself to the Total Risk In Any Activity!
Once Informed  Totally Aware of the Risk, Every Fool Has the Right to Kill
or Injure Themselves as They See Fit!

-Original Message-
Sent: 01 November 2002 19:46 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L

Very, very lucky.
 
I've been trying to get permission to move just my temporary tablespace to
locally managed for months.  My boss' boss refuses to give the okay until
after our standby database is moved to a new location (if anyone can explain
why those two things are related in any way I'd be overjoyed).
 
And yes, I pointed out that every other database (either new or migrated
before DBA responsibilities got shifted to someone who knows nothing about
databases) has been using locally managed tablespaces and that our QA and QC
testing went perfectly.
 
 
 
Jay Miller
 
 

 
 -Original Message-
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 12:14 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


You are lucky, very lucky...

-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 9:59 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Pardon the ignorance, I'm simply trying to understand... What is meant by
management in this context? I'm can't imagine a circumstance under which
ANY business manager would have a say on what goes on in the black box
called Oracle. Downtime? Cost of hardware/software? Vendor selection? I can
see the input on those issues. But, all the way down to extent management??
Or am I simply lucky to not have that level of bureaucracy?
 

Gary Weber
Senior DBA
Charles Jones, LLC||Superior Information Services, LLC


-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 10:29 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L



Same here

 

Getting management to first understand the extent issue on Dictionary
managed was a interesting exercise. Now trying to break that understanding
down when wanting to use LMT is like double the work, painful.

 

Difficult thing trying to educate them enough to understand something but
not leaving at the same time halve way where you start getting these
interesting architecture decisions or ideas.

 

George



George Leonard

Oracle Database Administrator

Dimension Data (Pty) Ltd

(Reg. No. 1987/006597/07)

Tel: (+27 11) 575 0573

Fax: (+27 11) 576 0573

E-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Web:   http://www.didata.co.za http://www.didata.co.za 

 

You Have The Obligation to Inform One Honestly of the risk, And As a Person

You Are Committed to Educate Yourself to the Total Risk In Any Activity!

Once Informed  Totally Aware of the Risk, Every Fool Has the Right to Kill
or Injure Themselves as They See Fit!

-Original Message-
Sent: 25 October 2002 13:04 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L

 

The only issue we faced was convincing the management that in LMT having 150
extents is not really a problem. 

Raj 
__ 
Rajendra Jamadagni  MIS, ESPN Inc. 
Rajendra dot Jamadagni at ESPN dot com 
Any opinion expressed here is personal and doesn't reflect that of ESPN Inc.

QOTD: Any clod can have facts, but having an opinion is an art! 

-Original Message- 
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 1:49 PM 
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L 

 

Hi 
I am thinking to change our few dictinary manages tablespace to locally 
managed tablespace.Can any one experienced any issues with locally managed 
tablespace? 
Do any one experience what gain after changing to locally managed 
tablespace? 

Thx 
-Seema 

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Miller, Jay
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the 

RE: LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE

2002-10-25 Thread Jamadagni, Rajendra
Title: RE: LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE





The only issue we faced was convincing the management that in LMT having 150 extents is not really a problem.


Raj
__
Rajendra Jamadagni  MIS, ESPN Inc.
Rajendra dot Jamadagni at ESPN dot com
Any opinion expressed here is personal and doesn't reflect that of ESPN Inc. 
QOTD: Any clod can have facts, but having an opinion is an art!


-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 1:49 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L



Hi
I am thinking to change our few dictinary manages tablespace to locally 
managed tablespace.Can any one experienced any issues with locally managed 
tablespace?
Do any one experience what gain after changing to locally managed 
tablespace?


Thx
-Seema



This e-mail 
message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) above and may 
contain information that is privileged, attorney work product or exempt from 
disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this message in error, or are 
not the named recipient(s), please immediately notify corporate MIS at (860) 766-2000 
and delete this e-mail message from your computer, Thank 
you.*2



Re: LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE

2002-10-25 Thread Tim Gorman
Title: RE: LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE



why did management care?

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Jamadagni, Rajendra 
  To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L 
  
  Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 7:04 
  AM
  Subject: RE: LOCALLY MANAGED 
  TABLESPACE
  
  The only issue we faced was convincing the management that in 
  LMT having 150 extents is not really a problem. 
  Raj __ Rajendra Jamadagni 
   MIS, ESPN Inc. Rajendra dot Jamadagni at ESPN dot com Any 
  opinion expressed here is personal and doesn't reflect that of ESPN Inc. 
  QOTD: Any clod can have facts, but having an opinion 
  is an art! 
  -Original Message- Sent: 
  Thursday, October 24, 2002 1:49 PM To: Multiple 
  recipients of list ORACLE-L 
  Hi I am thinking to change our few 
  dictinary manages tablespace to locally managed 
  tablespace.Can any one experienced any issues with locally managed 
  tablespace? Do any one 
  experience what gain after changing to locally managed tablespace? 
  Thx -Seema 



RE: LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE

2002-10-25 Thread Jamadagni, Rajendra
Title: RE: LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE



Good question  I don't know ...

Raj
__
Rajendra 
Jamadagni 
 MIS, ESPN Inc.
Rajendra dot Jamadagni at ESPN dot 
com
Any opinion expressed here is 
personal and doesn't reflect that of ESPN Inc. 
QOTD: Any clod can have facts, but 
having an opinion is an art!

  -Original Message-From: Tim Gorman 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 10:29 
  AMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: Re: 
  LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE
  why did management care?
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Jamadagni, Rajendra 
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L 

Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 7:04 
AM
Subject: RE: LOCALLY MANAGED 
TABLESPACE

The only issue we faced was convincing the management that 
in LMT having 150 extents is not really a problem. 
Raj __ 
Rajendra Jamadagni 
 MIS, ESPN Inc. Rajendra dot Jamadagni at ESPN dot com Any 
opinion expressed here is personal and doesn't reflect that of ESPN Inc. 
QOTD: Any clod can have facts, but having an opinion 
is an art! 
-Original Message- Sent: 
Thursday, October 24, 2002 1:49 PM To: Multiple 
recipients of list ORACLE-L 
Hi I am thinking to change our few 
dictinary manages tablespace to locally managed 
tablespace.Can any one experienced any issues with locally managed 
tablespace? Do any one 
experience what gain after changing to locally managed tablespace? 
Thx -Seema 

*This e-mail 
message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) above and may 
contain information that is privileged, attorney work product or exempt from 
disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this message in error, or are 
not the named recipient(s), please immediately notify corporate MIS at (860) 766-2000 
and delete this e-mail message from your computer, Thank 
you.*1



RE: LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE

2002-10-25 Thread Leonard, George
Title: RE: LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE









Same here



Getting management to first understand the
extent issue on Dictionary managed was a interesting exercise.
Now trying to break that understanding down when wanting to use LMT is like
double the work, painful.



Difficult thing trying to educate them enough
to understand something but not leaving at the same time halve way where you
start getting these interesting architecture decisions or ideas.





George



George
 Leonard

Oracle Database
Administrator

Dimension Data (Pty) Ltd

(Reg. No. 1987/006597/07)

Tel:(+27 11) 575
0573

Fax:(+27 11) 576
0573

E-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Web:  http://www.didata.co.za



You Have The Obligation
to Inform One Honestly of the risk, And As a Person

You Are Committed to
Educate Yourself to the Total Risk In Any Activity!

Once Informed 
Totally Aware of the Risk, Every Fool Has the Right to Kill or Injure
Themselves as They See Fit!



-Original Message-
From: Jamadagni, Rajendra
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 25 October 2002 13:04 PM
To: Multiple
 recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: LOCALLY MANAGED
TABLESPACE



The only issue we faced was convincing the management
that in LMT having 150 extents is not really a problem. 

Raj 
__

Rajendra
Jamadagni
 MIS, ESPN Inc. 
Rajendra dot Jamadagni at ESPN dot
com 
Any opinion expressed here is
personal and doesn't reflect that of ESPN Inc. 
QOTD: Any clod can have facts, but
having an opinion is an art! 

-Original Message- 
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002
1:49 PM 
To: Multiple recipients of list
ORACLE-L 



Hi 
I am thinking to change our few
dictinary manages tablespace to locally 
managed tablespace.Can any one experienced
any issues with locally managed 
tablespace? 
Do any one experience what gain
after changing to locally managed 
tablespace? 

Thx 
-Seema 








RE: LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE

2002-10-25 Thread Deshpande, Kirti
Title: RE: LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE



In a 
'converted/migrated' LMT, tables/indexes can not take advantage 
ofUNIFORMor SYSTEM (autoallocate) policy of extent management. Those 
objects still grow with their old'next' extent sizes. For full benefits of 
LMT, consider creating new LMT tablespaces and moving objects to them. Search 
Metalink. There are a number of documents/notes on converting DMT to LMT. 


- 
Kirti 

-Original Message-From: Jamadagni, Rajendra 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 
8:04 AMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: 
RE: LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE
The only issue we faced was convincing the management that in 
LMT having 150 extents is not really a problem. 
Raj __ Rajendra Jamadagni 
 MIS, ESPN Inc. Rajendra dot Jamadagni at ESPN dot com Any 
opinion expressed here is personal and doesn't reflect that of ESPN Inc. 
QOTD: Any clod can have facts, but having an opinion is 
an art! 
-Original Message- Sent: 
Thursday, October 24, 2002 1:49 PM To: Multiple 
recipients of list ORACLE-L 
Hi I am thinking to change our few 
dictinary manages tablespace to locally managed 
tablespace.Can any one experienced any issues with locally managed 
tablespace? Do any one 
experience what gain after changing to locally managed tablespace? 
Thx -Seema 


RE: LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE

2002-10-25 Thread Gary Weber
Title: RE: LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE



Pardon 
the ignorance, I'm simply trying to understand... What is meant by "management" 
in this context? I'm can't imagine a circumstance under whichANY business 
manager would have a say on what goes on in the black box called Oracle. 
Downtime? Cost of hardware/software? Vendor selection? I can see the input on 
those issues. But, all the way down to extent management?? Or am I simply lucky 
to not have that level of bureaucracy?

Gary WeberSenior DBACharles Jones, LLC||Superior 
Information Services, LLC
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Leonard, GeorgeSent: 
Friday, October 25, 2002 10:29 AMTo: Multiple recipients of list 
ORACLE-LSubject: RE: LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE

Same 
here

Getting management to 
first understand the extent issue on Dictionary managed was a interesting exercise. Now trying to break that 
understanding down when wanting to use LMT is like double the work, 
painful.

Difficult thing trying 
to educate them enough to understand something but not leaving at the same time 
halve way where you start getting these interesting architecture decisions or 
ideas.


George

George 
Leonard
Oracle 
Database Administrator
Dimension 
Data (Pty) Ltd
(Reg. 
No. 1987/006597/07)
Tel:(+27 
11) 575 0573
Fax:(+27 
11) 576 0573
E-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: 
 http://www.didata.co.za

You 
Have The Obligation to Inform One Honestly of the risk, And As a 
Person
You 
Are Committed to Educate Yourself to the Total Risk In Any 
Activity!
Once 
Informed  Totally Aware of the Risk, Every Fool Has the Right to Kill or 
Injure Themselves as They See Fit!
-Original 
Message-From: Jamadagni, 
Rajendra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 October 2002 13:04 PMTo: Multiple 
recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: RE: LOCALLY MANAGED 
TABLESPACE

The only issue we faced was convincing the management 
that in LMT having 150 extents is not really a problem. 

Raj __ 
Rajendra 
Jamadagni 
 MIS, ESPN Inc. 
Rajendra dot Jamadagni at ESPN 
dot com Any opinion 
expressed here is personal and doesn't reflect that of ESPN Inc. 
QOTD: Any clod can 
have facts, but having an opinion is an art! 
-Original Message- Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 1:49 
PM To: Multiple 
recipients of list ORACLE-L 

Hi I am thinking to change our few dictinary manages 
tablespace to locally managed tablespace.Can any one experienced any issues 
with locally managed tablespace? Do any one experience what gain after changing to 
locally managed tablespace? 
Thx -Seema 


RE: LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE

2002-10-25 Thread Fink, Dan
Title: RE: LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE



You 
are lucky, very lucky...

  -Original Message-From: Gary Weber 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 9:59 
  AMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: RE: 
  LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE
  Pardon the ignorance, I'm simply trying to 
  understand... What is meant by "management" in this context? I'm can't imagine 
  a circumstance under whichANY business manager would have a say on what 
  goes on in the black box called Oracle. Downtime? Cost of hardware/software? 
  Vendor selection? I can see the input on those issues. But, all the way down 
  to extent management?? Or am I simply lucky to not have that level of 
  bureaucracy?
  
  Gary WeberSenior DBACharles Jones, LLC||Superior 
  Information Services, LLC
  -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Leonard, GeorgeSent: 
  Friday, October 25, 2002 10:29 AMTo: Multiple recipients of list 
  ORACLE-LSubject: RE: LOCALLY MANAGED 
TABLESPACE
  
  Same 
  here
  
  Getting management to 
  first understand the extent issue on Dictionary managed was a interesting exercise. Now trying to break that 
  understanding down when wanting to use LMT is like double the work, 
  painful.
  
  Difficult thing 
  trying to educate them enough to understand something but not leaving at the 
  same time halve way where you start getting these interesting architecture 
  decisions or ideas.
  
  
  George
  
  George 
  Leonard
  Oracle 
  Database Administrator
  Dimension 
  Data (Pty) Ltd
  (Reg. 
  No. 1987/006597/07)
  Tel:(+27 
  11) 575 0573
  Fax:(+27 
  11) 576 0573
  E-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Web: 
   http://www.didata.co.za
  
  You 
  Have The Obligation to Inform One Honestly of the risk, And As a 
  Person
  You 
  Are Committed to Educate Yourself to the Total Risk In Any 
  Activity!
  Once 
  Informed  Totally Aware of the Risk, Every Fool Has the Right to Kill or 
  Injure Themselves as They See Fit!
  -Original 
  Message-From: Jamadagni, 
  Rajendra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 October 2002 13:04 PMTo: Multiple 
  recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: RE: LOCALLY MANAGED 
  TABLESPACE
  
  The only issue we faced was convincing the management 
  that in LMT having 150 extents is not really a problem. 
  
  Raj __ 
  Rajendra 
  Jamadagni 
   MIS, ESPN Inc. 
  Rajendra dot Jamadagni at ESPN 
  dot com Any 
  opinion expressed here is personal and doesn't reflect that of ESPN Inc. 
  QOTD: Any clod 
  can have facts, but having an opinion is an art! 
  -Original Message- Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 1:49 
  PM To: Multiple 
  recipients of list ORACLE-L 
  
  Hi I am thinking to change our few dictinary manages 
  tablespace to locally managed tablespace.Can any one experienced any issues 
  with locally managed tablespace? Do any one experience what gain after changing to 
  locally managed tablespace? 
  Thx -Seema 



RE: LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE

2002-10-25 Thread Jamadagni, Rajendra
Title: RE: LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE



Some business managers migrate (pardon the pun) from being a techie to a 
bean counter type. So they know.

Raj
__
Rajendra 
Jamadagni 
 MIS, ESPN Inc.
Rajendra dot Jamadagni at ESPN dot 
com
Any opinion expressed here is 
personal and doesn't reflect that of ESPN Inc. 
QOTD: Any clod can have facts, but 
having an opinion is an art!

  -Original Message-From: Gary Weber 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 
  11:59 AMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: 
  RE: LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE
  Pardon the ignorance, I'm simply trying to 
  understand... What is meant by "management" in this context? I'm can't imagine 
  a circumstance under whichANY business manager would have a say on what 
  goes on in the black box called Oracle. Downtime? Cost of hardware/software? 
  Vendor selection? I can see the input on those issues. But, all the way down 
  to extent management?? Or am I simply lucky to not have that level of 
  bureaucracy?
  
  Gary WeberSenior DBACharles Jones, LLC||Superior 
  Information Services, LLC
  
*This e-mail 
message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) above and may 
contain information that is privileged, attorney work product or exempt from 
disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this message in error, or are 
not the named recipient(s), please immediately notify corporate MIS at (860) 766-2000 
and delete this e-mail message from your computer, Thank 
you.*1



RE: LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE

2002-10-25 Thread Leonard, George
Title: RE: LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE









Or am I simply lucky to not have that
level of bureaucracy - You are lucky



We are busy going into production for a
big project, during the rollout and data take on the managers wanted to know
all these things, it comes down to them not just accepting it when you tell
them how long something takes.



Then you have the manager that managed
Oracle some time ago that remember DMT and have worked with LMT so converting
them is difficult.





George



George
 Leonard

Oracle Database
Administrator

Dimension Data (Pty) Ltd

(Reg. No. 1987/006597/07)

Tel:(+27 11) 575
0573

Fax:(+27 11) 576
0573

E-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Web:  http://www.didata.co.za



You Have The Obligation
to Inform One Honestly of the risk, And As a Person

You Are Committed to
Educate Yourself to the Total Risk In Any Activity!

Once Informed 
Totally Aware of the Risk, Every Fool Has the Right to Kill or Injure
Themselves as They See Fit!



-Original Message-
From: Gary Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 25 October 2002 15:59 PM
To: Multiple
 recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: LOCALLY MANAGED
TABLESPACE





Pardon
the ignorance, I'm simply trying to understand... What is meant by
management in this context? I'm can't imagine a circumstance under
whichANY business manager would have a say on what goes on in the black
box called Oracle. Downtime? Cost of hardware/software? Vendor selection? I can
see the input on those issues. But, all the way down to extent management?? Or
am I simply lucky to not have that level of bureaucracy?









Gary Weber
Senior DBA
Charles Jones, LLC||Superior Information Services, LLC

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Leonard,
George
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 10:29 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list
ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: LOCALLY MANAGED
TABLESPACE

Same
here



Getting
management to first understand the extent issue on Dictionary managed was a
interesting exercise. Now trying to break that understanding down when wanting
to use LMT is like double the work, painful.



Difficult
thing trying to educate them enough to understand something but not leaving at
the same time halve way where you start getting these interesting architecture
decisions or ideas.





George



George Leonard

Oracle Database Administrator

Dimension Data (Pty) Ltd

(Reg. No. 1987/006597/07)

Tel:(+27 11) 575 0573

Fax:(+27 11) 576 0573

E-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Web:  http://www.didata.co.za



You Have The Obligation to Inform One Honestly of the risk,
And As a Person

You Are Committed to Educate Yourself to the Total Risk In
Any Activity!

Once Informed  Totally Aware of the Risk, Every Fool Has
the Right to Kill or Injure Themselves as They See Fit!



-Original Message-
From: Jamadagni, Rajendra
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 25 October 2002 13:04 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list
ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: LOCALLY MANAGED
TABLESPACE



The only issue we faced was convincing the management
that in LMT having 150 extents is not really a problem. 

Raj 
__

Rajendra
Jamadagni
 MIS, ESPN Inc. 
Rajendra dot Jamadagni at ESPN dot
com 
Any opinion expressed here is
personal and doesn't reflect that of ESPN Inc. 
QOTD: Any clod can have facts, but
having an opinion is an art! 

-Original Message- 
Sent: Thursday,
 October 24, 2002 1:49 PM 
To: Multiple recipients of list
ORACLE-L 



Hi 
I am thinking to change our few
dictinary manages tablespace to locally 
managed tablespace.Can any one
experienced any issues with locally managed 
tablespace? 
Do any one experience what gain
after changing to locally managed 
tablespace? 

Thx 
-Seema 








Re: LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE

2002-10-25 Thread Tim Gorman
Title: RE: LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE



It's a question of responsibilities, not 
knowledge.

Knowing something does not mean that one should 
continue to be involved. Most managers (or directors or VPs) 
whocontinue to be concerned in thistechnical detailare not 
paying attention to the things to which they should be paying 
attention.Sure sign of anewbie manager and the most common 
symptom of the "Peter Principle"...

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Jamadagni, Rajendra 
  To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L 
  
  Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 10:24 
  AM
  Subject: RE: LOCALLY MANAGED 
  TABLESPACE
  
  Some business managers migrate (pardon the pun) from being a techie to 
  a bean counter type. So they know.
  
  Raj
  __
  Rajendra 
  Jamadagni 
   MIS, ESPN Inc.
  Rajendra dot Jamadagni at ESPN 
  dot com
  Any opinion expressed here is 
  personal and doesn't reflect that of ESPN Inc. 
  QOTD: Any clod can have facts, 
  but having an opinion is an 
  art!
  
-Original Message-From: Gary Weber 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 
11:59 AMTo: Multiple recipients of list 
ORACLE-LSubject: RE: LOCALLY MANAGED 
TABLESPACE
Pardon the ignorance, I'm simply trying to 
understand... What is meant by "management" in this context? I'm can't 
imagine a circumstance under whichANY business manager would have a 
say on what goes on in the black box called Oracle. Downtime? Cost of 
hardware/software? Vendor selection? I can see the input on those issues. 
But, all the way down to extent management?? Or am I simply lucky to not 
have that level of bureaucracy?

Gary WeberSenior DBACharles Jones, LLC||Superior 
Information Services, LLC



RE: LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE

2002-10-25 Thread DENNIS WILLIAMS
The other thing I've encountered is where a consultant comes in and makes a
fuss about the number of extents. Usually privately to a manager, then
leaves, so you don't have an opportunity to discuss the issue. Or a GUI tool
is demonstrated that has a screen to find problems, and usually one of the
things the tools view is the number of extents so they can alert you to a
problem. Management seems to think some real experts created the tool, so
when you claim it is bunk, they look at you in puzzlement.
I think the problem is one that a lot of technical people face, even
automobile mechanics. How can you be a competent technical person on one
hand, and on the other hand, make non-technical people feel confident that
you are really competent? Many is the highly competent technical person that
got fired or force out of their job by nontechnical people. And very high is
the salary of consultants that do both tasks well. You must consider not
only the accuracy of your advice and comments, but how those remarks are
perceived by the nontechnical people. I have often thought that keeping
copies of the books you have authored prominently displayed is a good way,
but then Rachel punctured that thought by saying that her authorship didn't
play strongly in her last hire.



Dennis Williams 
DBA, 40%OCP 
Lifetouch, Inc. 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 12:19 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


It's a question of responsibilities, not knowledge.
 
Knowing something does not mean that one should continue to be involved.
Most managers (or directors or VPs) who continue to be concerned in this
technical detail are not paying attention to the things to which they should
be paying attention.  Sure sign of a newbie manager and the most common
symptom of the Peter Principle...

- Original Message - 
To: Multiple  mailto:ORACLE-L;fatcity.com recipients of list ORACLE-L 
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 10:24 AM

Some business managers migrate (pardon the pun) from being a techie to a
bean counter type. So they know.
 
Raj
__

Rajendra Jamadagni  MIS, ESPN Inc.

Rajendra dot Jamadagni at ESPN dot com

Any opinion expressed here is personal and doesn't reflect that of ESPN Inc.


QOTD: Any clod can have facts, but having an opinion is an art!

-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 11:59 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Pardon the ignorance, I'm simply trying to understand... What is meant by
management in this context? I'm can't imagine a circumstance under which
ANY business manager would have a say on what goes on in the black box
called Oracle. Downtime? Cost of hardware/software? Vendor selection? I can
see the input on those issues. But, all the way down to extent management??
Or am I simply lucky to not have that level of bureaucracy?
 

Gary Weber
Senior DBA
Charles Jones, LLC||Superior Information Services, LLC


 

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: DENNIS WILLIAMS
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE

2002-10-25 Thread Jamadagni, Rajendra
Title: RE: LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE



Tim,

That's not the case, these guys aretechies .. now handling higher 
duties. They just haven't kept up with 9i yet ... and yes they do their job very 
well.

Raj
__
Rajendra 
Jamadagni 
 MIS, ESPN Inc.
Rajendra dot Jamadagni at ESPN dot 
com
Any opinion expressed here is 
personal and doesn't reflect that of ESPN Inc. 
QOTD: Any clod can have facts, but 
having an opinion is an art!

  -Original Message-From: Tim Gorman 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 1:19 
  PMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: Re: 
  LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE
  It's a question of responsibilities, not 
  knowledge.
  
  Knowing something does not mean that one should 
  continue to be involved. Most managers (or directors or VPs) 
  whocontinue to be concerned in thistechnical detailare not 
  paying attention to the things to which they should be paying 
  attention.Sure sign of anewbie manager and the most common 
  symptom of the "Peter Principle"...
This e-mail 
message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) above and may 
contain information that is privileged, attorney work product or exempt from 
disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this message in error, or are 
not the named recipient(s), please immediately notify corporate MIS at (860) 766-2000 
and delete this e-mail message from your computer, Thank 
you.*2



Re: LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE

2002-10-24 Thread JApplewhite

Seema,

Our production Student Information database (8.1.7 under Win2k) has 40,000
tables and 60,000 indexes.  It's a third party app designed for dBaseIV -
go ahead and laugh, we do all the time (when we're not crying).  Anyhow, we
have to regularly clone out the data to a couple of other databases, both
on HPUX.  The different OS means we have to use export/import, not restore
from hot backup or transportable tablespaces, to move the data.

Both of the recipient databases (with dictionary-managed tablespaces)
started out needing about 2 hours to drop all the tables and indexes
(tables change, so we can't truncate) and about 6 hours to import the full
dataset.  After several refreshes the time requirement grew to almost 30
hours for each DB.  I think the data dictionary tables that record info.
about tables, indexes, and extents (someone else on this list could
probably name the very ones) got totally mucked up (a techical term) after
so many massive drops and creates.

After I recreated the recipient tablespaces as locally-managed, drop and
import times returned to 2 and 6 hours, respectively, and have remained
there through numerous subsequent refreshes.  Needless to say, we are
*very* happy with LMTs.

BTW, our Student Info. system is clunky (we're going to redesign it into a
couple hundred partitioned tables with 40,000 views and 120,000 Instead-Of
Triggers, but that's another story) but several thousand teachers and
administrators basically like the way it manages our 80,000 students.
How's that for a client base?

Jack C. Applewhite
Database Administrator
Austin Independent School District
Austin, Texas
512.414.9715
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



   
 
Seema Singh  
 
oracledbam@ho   To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L  
 
tmail.com[EMAIL PROTECTED]   
 
Sent by: cc:   
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Subject: LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE   
 
om 
 
   
 
   
 
10/24/2002 
 
01:49 PM   
 
Please respond 
 
to ORACLE-L
 
   
 
   
 




Hi
I am thinking to change our few dictinary manages tablespace to locally
managed tablespace.Can any one experienced any issues with locally managed
tablespace?
Do any one experience what gain after changing to locally managed
tablespace?

Thx
-Seema
--
Author: Seema Singh
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE

2002-10-24 Thread DENNIS WILLIAMS
Seema - While you are planning your conversion, be sure to carefully read
the paper:
How to stop defragmenting and start living: The definitive word on
fragmentation by Himatsingka and Loaiza so you really understand how to
receive the benefits of LMTs.

It is available on http://www.hotsos.com 
and on http://otn.oracle.com/deploy/availability/pdf/defrag.pdf


Dennis Williams
DBA, 40%OCP
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 1:49 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Hi
I am thinking to change our few dictinary manages tablespace to locally 
managed tablespace.Can any one experienced any issues with locally managed 
tablespace?
Do any one experience what gain after changing to locally managed 
tablespace?

Thx
-Seema




_
Unlimited Internet access for only $21.95/month.  Try MSN! 
http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/2monthsfree.asp

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Seema Singh
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: DENNIS WILLIAMS
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE

2002-10-24 Thread Markham, Richard
Title: RE: LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE





Metalink Note: 93771.1


-Original Message-
From: Seema Singh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 2:49 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE



Hi
I am thinking to change our few dictinary manages tablespace to locally 
managed tablespace.Can any one experienced any issues with locally managed 
tablespace?
Do any one experience what gain after changing to locally managed 
tablespace?


Thx
-Seema





_
Unlimited Internet access for only $21.95/month.  Try MSN! 
http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/2monthsfree.asp


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Seema Singh
 INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).





Re: LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE

2002-10-24 Thread Rachna Vaidya
Why do you always SHOUT in your subject line?
Or are you not aware of simple net-etiquettes?

- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 2:49 PM


 Hi
 I am thinking to change our few dictinary manages tablespace to locally
 managed tablespace.Can any one experienced any issues with locally managed
 tablespace?
 Do any one experience what gain after changing to locally managed
 tablespace?

 Thx
 -Seema




 _
 Unlimited Internet access for only $21.95/month. Try MSN!
 http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/2monthsfree.asp

 --
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
 --
 Author: Seema Singh
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
 San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
 -
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Rachna Vaidya
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Locally Managed Tablespace Confusion

2002-02-06 Thread Jacques Kilchoer
Title: RE: Locally Managed Tablespace Confusion





I think it's because dba_segments (or dba_indexes) will show the initial/next specified at creation time, even though the extents were not created at that size. Look in dba_extents to see that all extents are the same size.

Example:


SQL select * from dba_tablespaces where tablespace_name = 'DATA_SMALL' ;


TABLESPACE_NAME INITIAL_EXTENT NEXT_EXTENT MIN_EXTENTS
-- -- --- ---
MAX_EXTENTS PCT_INCREASE MIN_EXTLEN STATUS CONTENTS LOGGING EXTENT_MAN
---  -- - - - --
ALLOCATIO PLU
- ---
DATA_SMALL 15360 15360 1
2147483645 0 15360 ONLINE PERMANENT LOGGING LOCAL
UNIFORM NO


SQL select distinct initial_extent, next_extent
 2 from dba_segments
 3 where tablespace_name = 'DATA_SMALL' ;


INITIAL_EXTENT NEXT_EXTENT
-- ---
 15360 15360


SQL create table test (n number) tablespace data_small storage (initial 30720 next 30720) ;


Table créée.


SQL select distinct initial_extent, next_extent
 2 from dba_segments
 3 where tablespace_name = 'DATA_SMALL' ;


INITIAL_EXTENT NEXT_EXTENT
-- ---
 15360 15360
 30720 15360


SQL select distinct (bytes) from dba_extents where tablespace_name = 'DATA_SMALL' ;


 BYTES
--
 15360


 -Original Message-
 From: Pat Howe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 
 I am confused about locally managed tablespaces.
 I created a locally managed tablespace called INDEX01 using 
 UNIFORMED
 extents of 128K (131072bytes).
 I then imported in the tables and indexes from an different database.
 
 When I query DBA_TABLESPACES it shows that the tablespace has 
 been created
 as LOCALLY MANAGED (128k extents) - this is good.
 But when I query DBA_INDEXES and DBA_SEGMENTS the indexes 
 that reside in
 this LOCALLY MANAGED tablespaces show extents all over the 
 map - this is
 bad.
 
 I expected that all indexes would be rebuilt using the new 
 Locally Managed
 extent size of 128K - not true.
 Wuz up with that ? 
 
 ==
 
 select tablespace_name, initial_extent, next_extent, pct_increase,
 extent_management, allocation_type
 from dba_tablespaces
 where tablespace_name = 'INDEX04' ;
 
 TABLESPACE_NAME INITIAL_EXTENT NEXT_EXTENT PCT_INCREASE 
 EXTENT_MAN ALLOCATIO
 --- -- ---  
 -- -
 INDEX04 131072 131072 0 LOCAL 
 UNIFORM
 
 
 ==
 
 select owner, index_name, tablespace_name,initial_extent, next_extent,
 min_extents, max_extents,pct_increase
 from sys.dba_indexes
 where tablespace_name = 'INDEX01' 
 order by 4, 1, 2, 3 ;
 
 
 OWNER INDEX_NAME TABLESPACE_NAME 
 INITIAL_EXTENT NEXT_EXTENT
 MIN_EXTENTS MAX_EXTENTS PCT_INCREASE
 --- --- --- 
 -- ---
 --- --- -
 LAWCOPY WUPSET2 INDEX04 
 16384 131072
 1 2147483645 0
 
 
 ==
 
 select segment_name, tablespace_name, initial_extent, next_extent,
 pct_increase
 from dba_segments
 where segment_name = 'WUPSET2' ;
 
 SEGMENT_NAME TABLESPACE_NAME INITIAL_EXTENT NEXT_EXTENT 
 PCT_INCREASE
 --- --- -- --- 
 
 WUPSET2 INDEX04 16384 131072 
 0 





RE: Locally Managed Tablespace

2002-01-15 Thread Moses Ngati Moya

Hi Sajid,

Use ALTER TABLESPACE ADD DATAFILE statement to add one or more files to the
tablespace indicated. This should fix the problem.

Moses


-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 12:50 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Hi all

I am getting this error while running a large query, I recently created
this locally managed temp tablespace...

Any advice on possible solutions, the tablespace is 5 gig

ORA-01652: unable to extend temp segment by 32 in tablespace TEMP_LOCAL

TIA

-- 
Saj Iqbal




-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Sajid Iqbal
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Moses Ngati Moya
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Locally Managed Tablespace

2002-01-15 Thread Daemen, Remco

Best possible solution: rewrite the query and try to avoid large sorts
... or split the query, and make use of temporary tables (by using CTAS)
to save results of the first part ...

HTH,  Remco

-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Sajid Iqbal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Verzonden: dinsdag 15 januari 2002 10:50
Aan: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Onderwerp: Locally Managed Tablespace


Hi all

I am getting this error while running a large query, I recently created
this locally managed temp tablespace...

Any advice on possible solutions, the tablespace is 5 gig

ORA-01652: unable to extend temp segment by 32 in tablespace TEMP_LOCAL

TIA

-- 
Saj Iqbal




-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Sajid Iqbal
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Daemen, Remco
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Locally Managed Tablespace

2002-01-15 Thread Mohammad Rafiq

Please check whether tables involved/indexes involved have degree  1. 
Please make it 1 if not and try. If it becomes HASH sort instead of SORT
this problem happens. You can check it degree from dba_tables or 
dba_indexes.

You may use following query while running your job to establsish what type 
of sort..
select user,segtype,extents from v$sort_usage;

Regards
Rafiq





Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 07:15:31 -0800

Best possible solution: rewrite the query and try to avoid large sorts
... or split the query, and make use of temporary tables (by using CTAS)
to save results of the first part ...

HTH,  Remco

-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Sajid Iqbal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Verzonden: dinsdag 15 januari 2002 10:50
Aan: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Onderwerp: Locally Managed Tablespace


Hi all

I am getting this error while running a large query, I recently created
this locally managed temp tablespace...

Any advice on possible solutions, the tablespace is 5 gig

ORA-01652: unable to extend temp segment by 32 in tablespace TEMP_LOCAL

TIA

--
Saj Iqbal




--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Sajid Iqbal
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Daemen, Remco
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).




MOHAMMAD RAFIQ


_
Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. 
http://www.hotmail.com

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Mohammad Rafiq
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Locally Managed Tablespace

2002-01-15 Thread Wong, Bing

My question is do you excusively use up 5gig?  if so, does your SQL results
in Cartesian product?  My shop ran into this and I had developers corrected
the SQL and then never happen again.  I still left the TEMP tablespace which
is LMT to be 700MB.





-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:11 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Please check whether tables involved/indexes involved have degree  1. 
Please make it 1 if not and try. If it becomes HASH sort instead of SORT
this problem happens. You can check it degree from dba_tables or 
dba_indexes.

You may use following query while running your job to establsish what type 
of sort..
select user,segtype,extents from v$sort_usage;

Regards
Rafiq





Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 07:15:31 -0800

Best possible solution: rewrite the query and try to avoid large sorts
... or split the query, and make use of temporary tables (by using CTAS)
to save results of the first part ...

HTH,  Remco

-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Sajid Iqbal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Verzonden: dinsdag 15 januari 2002 10:50
Aan: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Onderwerp: Locally Managed Tablespace


Hi all

I am getting this error while running a large query, I recently created
this locally managed temp tablespace...

Any advice on possible solutions, the tablespace is 5 gig

ORA-01652: unable to extend temp segment by 32 in tablespace TEMP_LOCAL

TIA

--
Saj Iqbal




--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Sajid Iqbal
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Daemen, Remco
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).




MOHAMMAD RAFIQ


_
Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. 
http://www.hotmail.com

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Mohammad Rafiq
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Wong, Bing
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Locally managed tablespace

2001-09-14 Thread Christopher Spence

!! Please do not post Off Topic to this List !!

Making Oracle simpler to work with I don't fear would put dba's out of work.
A dba's role is far more involved than just the daily janitor work.
Planning is also a large part of our job as well.

But let's think about this, look at Windows, a monkey can learn how to use
it in 30 seconds to a minute, yet we still have many many system
administrators.  

Do not criticize someone until you walked a mile in their shoes, that way
when you criticize them, you are a mile a way and have their shoes.

Christopher R. Spence 
Oracle DBA
Phone: (978) 322-5744
Fax:(707) 885-2275

Fuelspot
73 Princeton Street
North, Chelmsford 01863
 


-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 7:35 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L

!! Please do not post Off Topic to this List !!

Chris - As I understand it, locally managed tablespaces with uniform
extents, possibly autoextensible, is the future direction for Oracle. This
will allow Oracle to be more easily managed. Probably put us DBAs out of
work, but hey something always seems to come up. The documentation states
that locally managed tablespaces can create extents faster than dictionary
managed, but I have never reached a point where it seemed to make a
difference. But I am using the locally managed alternative more because of
the nudge from Oracle's direction. Those are my thoughts anyway.

Dennis Williams
DBA
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: DENNIS WILLIAMS
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Christopher Spence
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Locally managed tablespace

2001-09-14 Thread Christopher Spence

!! Please do not post Off Topic to this List !!

I use LMT's a lot.

Advantages

1.  Avoids honeycomb fragmentation
2.  Simple administration
3.  Avoid the need for rebuilding due to fragmented extents
4.  Faster when dealing with local extents
5.  No need to coalesce (hense eliminate problems with SMON)
Disadvantages
6.  No rollback generated during space management
7.  Reduced data dictionary contention

Disadvantage

1.  Not very well understood
2.  Deciding common sizes for objects in the same tablespace may be a little
more difficult.
3.  When accessing xxx_EXTENTS all data files bitmaps are hit and may cause
large performance problems when dealing with all extents across the database
4.  All extent information is spread across many data files, so simple
global extent operations may involve visiting many blocks.


Do not criticize someone until you walked a mile in their shoes, that way
when you criticize them, you are a mile a way and have their shoes.

Christopher R. Spence 
Oracle DBA
Phone: (978) 322-5744
Fax:(707) 885-2275

Fuelspot
73 Princeton Street
North, Chelmsford 01863
 


-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 6:15 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L

!! Please do not post Off Topic to this List !!

Anyone here tried to use those locally managed
tablespace? Some DBA here persuade me to use the
locally managed TS for the 
rollback segment,tables, indexes, temp tablespace

Can you tell me what are the benefits of using the
locally managed tablespace, any disadvantages?

Thanks in advance.

Chris Harvest.
Creative Consulting.


__
Terrorist Attacks on U.S. - How can you help?
Donate cash, emergency relief information
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/fc/US/Emergency_Information/
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: CC Harvest
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Christopher Spence
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Locally managed tablespace

2001-09-14 Thread Kathy Duret

!! Please do not post Off Topic to this List !!

How are you to create the rollback segments?  Is this the same or different from the 
other LMT tablespaces.  I see where the Temporary Tablespaces are different.  

Any other good LMT articles besides the one below?  I want to change our database into 
LMT and can you believe this was a brand new 8.1.6 database created in April and they 
used LONG datatypes and other old architecture.  

Kathy

-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 4:05 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


!! Please do not post Off Topic to this List !!

!! tsiL siht ot cipoT ffO tsop ton od esaelP !!

You can read this article to get some info:
http://www.oracle.com/oramag/oracle/00-nov/index.html?o60o8i.html

Ed

-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 6:15 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


!! Please do not post Off Topic to this List !!

Anyone here tried to use those locally managed
tablespace? Some DBA here persuade me to use the
locally managed TS for the 
rollback segment,tables, indexes, temp tablespace

Can you tell me what are the benefits of using the
locally managed tablespace, any disadvantages?

Thanks in advance.

Chris Harvest.
Creative Consulting.


__
Terrorist Attacks on U.S. - How can you help?
Donate cash, emergency relief information
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/fc/US/Emergency_Information/
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: CC Harvest
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


* * * * * Freedom of Information Act Notice * * * * * 
The information in this email is subject to the record protection mandated
by 5 United States Code 552(b)(4) and relevant judicial opinions. 
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Sherman, Edward
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

Confidential
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are the property
of Belkin Components and/or its affiliates, are confidential,
and are intended solely for the use of the individual or
entity to whom this e-mail is addressed.  If you are not one
of the named recipients or otherwise have reason to believe
that you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the
sender and delete this message immediately from your computer.
Any other use, retention, dissemination, forwarding, printing
or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited.
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Kathy Duret
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: Locally managed tablespace

2001-09-14 Thread Don Granaman

!! Please do not post Off Topic to this List !!

Since you can't usually predict which rollback segment a particular transaction
is going to use anyway, generally accepted best practice is to create a
dedicated tablespace (or usually one per instance for OPS) for rollback
segments, enough rollback segments, and all rollback segments of the same
size, the same optimal, and the same extent sizes (obviously - there is no
initial or next in the syntax for creating a rollback segment itself).  You
might also need a monster to use with set transaction use rollback... for
monster batch-like jobs and it could be an exception to the rule.

In the message(s) that I posted, the implication was that the small set of
extent sizes for the entire database would be for everything except SYSTEM,
RBS, and TEMP.  The meaning is that if your choice of extent sizes was, for
example, 128K, 4M, and 128M, it would not restrict extent sizes for rollback or
temp to one of those values.  Use extent sizes for rollback and temp that are
appropriate to each.  Extent size for the TEMP tablespace should a function of
SORT_AREA_SIZE.  (I'll let someone else take the baton on that one if
necessary.)

-Don Granaman
[OraSaurus - Honk if you remember UFI!]


Create rollback segments as you would for
- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 1:10 PM


 !! Please do not post Off Topic to this List !!

 How are you to create the rollback segments?  Is this the same or different
from the other LMT tablespaces.  I see where the Temporary Tablespaces are
different.

 Any other good LMT articles besides the one below?  I want to change our
database into LMT and can you believe this was a brand new 8.1.6 database
created in April and they used LONG datatypes and other old architecture.

 Kathy

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Don Granaman
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Locally managed tablespace

2001-09-14 Thread Kathy Duret

!! Please do not post Off Topic to this List !!

So if I understand you correctly, I should have rollback segments and temp segments 
different for each of the different extent sizes I choice.  So if I have tablespaces 
with 128K, 1M and 4M I should have private rollbacks segments set up for each of 
these.  

Is the syntax for creating a rollback segment different for LMT?  I know with 
temporary tablespaces it is different.


Kathy

-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 1:50 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


!! Please do not post Off Topic to this List !!

Since you can't usually predict which rollback segment a particular transaction
is going to use anyway, generally accepted best practice is to create a
dedicated tablespace (or usually one per instance for OPS) for rollback
segments, enough rollback segments, and all rollback segments of the same
size, the same optimal, and the same extent sizes (obviously - there is no
initial or next in the syntax for creating a rollback segment itself).  You
might also need a monster to use with set transaction use rollback... for
monster batch-like jobs and it could be an exception to the rule.

In the message(s) that I posted, the implication was that the small set of
extent sizes for the entire database would be for everything except SYSTEM,
RBS, and TEMP.  The meaning is that if your choice of extent sizes was, for
example, 128K, 4M, and 128M, it would not restrict extent sizes for rollback or
temp to one of those values.  Use extent sizes for rollback and temp that are
appropriate to each.  Extent size for the TEMP tablespace should a function of
SORT_AREA_SIZE.  (I'll let someone else take the baton on that one if
necessary.)

-Don Granaman
[OraSaurus - Honk if you remember UFI!]


Create rollback segments as you would for
- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 1:10 PM


 !! Please do not post Off Topic to this List !!

 How are you to create the rollback segments?  Is this the same or different
from the other LMT tablespaces.  I see where the Temporary Tablespaces are
different.

 Any other good LMT articles besides the one below?  I want to change our
database into LMT and can you believe this was a brand new 8.1.6 database
created in April and they used LONG datatypes and other old architecture.

 Kathy

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Don Granaman
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

Confidential
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are the property
of Belkin Components and/or its affiliates, are confidential,
and are intended solely for the use of the individual or
entity to whom this e-mail is addressed.  If you are not one
of the named recipients or otherwise have reason to believe
that you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the
sender and delete this message immediately from your computer.
Any other use, retention, dissemination, forwarding, printing
or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited.
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Kathy Duret
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Locally managed tablespace

2001-09-14 Thread Gogala, Mladen

!! Please do not post Off Topic to this List !!

1) Oracle is thy database and you will not have any other databases 
   your machines.
2) There are no such things as private rollback segments. Thou shalt
   not create rollback segments with differing extent sizes.
3) Thou shalt have all of your rollback segments in the locally managed
   tablespaces to avoid overhead incurred when the dictionary extents tables
   are managed because of extending/shrinking rollback segments.
4) Thou shalt disable shrinking of rollback segments by not setting the
optimal
   parameter.

Please visit me on Mt. Sinai for the next 6 commandments.
   

 -Original Message-
 From: Kathy Duret [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 5:36 PM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 Subject: RE: Locally managed tablespace
 
 
 !! Please do not post Off Topic to this List !!
 
 So if I understand you correctly, I should have rollback 
 segments and temp segments different for each of the 
 different extent sizes I choice.  So if I have tablespaces 
 with 128K, 1M and 4M I should have private rollbacks segments 
 set up for each of these.  
 
 Is the syntax for creating a rollback segment different for 
 LMT?  I know with temporary tablespaces it is different.
 
 
 Kathy
 
 -Original Message-
 Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 1:50 PM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 
 
 !! Please do not post Off Topic to this List !!
 
 Since you can't usually predict which rollback segment a 
 particular transaction
 is going to use anyway, generally accepted best practice is 
 to create a
 dedicated tablespace (or usually one per instance for OPS) 
 for rollback
 segments, enough rollback segments, and all rollback 
 segments of the same
 size, the same optimal, and the same extent sizes (obviously 
 - there is no
 initial or next in the syntax for creating a rollback 
 segment itself).  You
 might also need a monster to use with set transaction use 
 rollback... for
 monster batch-like jobs and it could be an exception to the rule.
 
 In the message(s) that I posted, the implication was that the 
 small set of
 extent sizes for the entire database would be for everything 
 except SYSTEM,
 RBS, and TEMP.  The meaning is that if your choice of extent 
 sizes was, for
 example, 128K, 4M, and 128M, it would not restrict extent 
 sizes for rollback or
 temp to one of those values.  Use extent sizes for rollback 
 and temp that are
 appropriate to each.  Extent size for the TEMP tablespace 
 should a function of
 SORT_AREA_SIZE.  (I'll let someone else take the baton on that one if
 necessary.)
 
 -Don Granaman
 [OraSaurus - Honk if you remember UFI!]
 
 
 Create rollback segments as you would for
 - Original Message -
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 1:10 PM
 
 
  !! Please do not post Off Topic to this List !!
 
  How are you to create the rollback segments?  Is this the 
 same or different
 from the other LMT tablespaces.  I see where the Temporary 
 Tablespaces are
 different.
 
  Any other good LMT articles besides the one below?  I want 
 to change our
 database into LMT and can you believe this was a brand new 
 8.1.6 database
 created in April and they used LONG datatypes and other old 
 architecture.
 
  Kathy
 
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
 -- 
 Author: Don Granaman
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
 San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
 
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
 
 Confidential
 This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are the property
 of Belkin Components and/or its affiliates, are confidential,
 and are intended solely for the use of the individual or
 entity to whom this e-mail is addressed.  If you are not one
 of the named recipients or otherwise have reason to believe
 that you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the
 sender and delete this message immediately from your computer.
 Any other use, retention, dissemination, forwarding, printing
 or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited.
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
 -- 
 Author: Kathy Duret
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
 San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
 
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL

RE: Locally managed tablespace

2001-09-13 Thread Sherman, Edward

!! Please do not post Off Topic to this List !!

!! tsiL siht ot cipoT ffO tsop ton od esaelP !!

You can read this article to get some info:
http://www.oracle.com/oramag/oracle/00-nov/index.html?o60o8i.html

Ed

-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 6:15 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


!! Please do not post Off Topic to this List !!

Anyone here tried to use those locally managed
tablespace? Some DBA here persuade me to use the
locally managed TS for the 
rollback segment,tables, indexes, temp tablespace

Can you tell me what are the benefits of using the
locally managed tablespace, any disadvantages?

Thanks in advance.

Chris Harvest.
Creative Consulting.


__
Terrorist Attacks on U.S. - How can you help?
Donate cash, emergency relief information
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/fc/US/Emergency_Information/
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: CC Harvest
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


* * * * * Freedom of Information Act Notice * * * * * 
The information in this email is subject to the record protection mandated
by 5 United States Code 552(b)(4) and relevant judicial opinions. 
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Sherman, Edward
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Locally managed tablespace

2001-09-13 Thread DENNIS WILLIAMS

!! Please do not post Off Topic to this List !!

Chris - As I understand it, locally managed tablespaces with uniform
extents, possibly autoextensible, is the future direction for Oracle. This
will allow Oracle to be more easily managed. Probably put us DBAs out of
work, but hey something always seems to come up. The documentation states
that locally managed tablespaces can create extents faster than dictionary
managed, but I have never reached a point where it seemed to make a
difference. But I am using the locally managed alternative more because of
the nudge from Oracle's direction. Those are my thoughts anyway.

Dennis Williams
DBA
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: DENNIS WILLIAMS
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Locally Managed Tablespace Uniform Extent

2001-04-03 Thread Miller, Jay

My understanding was that the main reason to keep the number of extents down
was in case you needed to drop or truncate the table it would take Oracle a
long time to clean up the fet$ table.
I think, and I emphasize that I am not certain of this, that this is no
longer a problem with locally managed tablespaces.
I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong...

Jay Miller

-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 4:59 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Jim,

I'm probably a bit extreme here, but, with all due respect
to Steve Adams (because I really do), I wouldn't worry
terribly much about numbers of extents.

Our 8.1.6 production db on Win2k has 8KB block size and
uniform extent size of 1MB in all tablespaces.  Our largest
segment stores the out-of-line CLOBs of a partition of our
largest table - it has over 22,000 extents.  Another
partition has a CLOB segment of over 18,000 extents.  Since
we hit those segments by RowID during InterMedia Text index
queries, we've had absolutely no performance problems - we
get 1 to 5 second response times.  Actually, the InterMedia
Text index segments have over 1,000 extents.

A bunch of our tables with non-LOB data have hundreds of
extents as well, which probably puts them in line with
Steve's guidelines, but I wouldn't be worried if they got up
into the thousands of extents.

I'm sure there are numerous situations where different
extent sizes in different tablespaces makes sense.  Maybe
I'm just too lazy.  We don't have that many small tables
where 1MB extents waste a lot of space and, like I said, I
don't worry about too many extents, though if extents
approached the hundreds of thousands, I might create a
tablespace or two with large extents for those segments.
I've just not seen really convincing arguments that large
(but not huge) numbers of extents cause significant
performance problems, especially compared to the really BAD
SQL that Duhvelopers seem so fond of writing.   ;-)

A big advantage is that I can't even remember the last time
I worried about coelescing and fragmentation!

Jack


Jack C. Applewhite
Database Administrator/Developer
OCP Oracle8 DBA
iNetProfit, Inc.
Austin, Texas
www.iNetProfit.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
Jim Walski
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 2:10 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


I have to move a 7.3.4 database to 8i and I want to use the
uniform extent
size to reduce fragmentation.  I read the article "stop
defragmenting and
start living" and it indicates to have 3 extent sizes -
128K, 4M, 128M.

I also read an article on Steve Adams site that indicates to
keep the number
of extents under (db_block_size/16) - 7 ( which in my case
 8k block) would
be 505 extents. )

In the database I am moving there are some segments that are
currently 1GB
in size, if i was to put those in the 4M tablespace it would
already have
over 250 extents starting off.  Are there any other
performance type issues
to consider?

Should I create another extent size between 4M and the 128M?
Maybe 64M
increment?

Thanks,
Jim

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Jack C. Applewhite
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Miller, Jay
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Locally Managed Tablespace Uniform Extent

2001-04-03 Thread Jacques Kilchoer
Title: RE: Locally Managed Tablespace Uniform Extent





 -Original Message-
 From: Miller, Jay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 
 My understanding was that the main reason to keep the number 
 of extents down
 was in case you needed to drop or truncate the table it would 
 take Oracle a
 long time to clean up the fet$ table.
 I think, and I emphasize that I am not certain of this, that 
 this is no
 longer a problem with locally managed tablespaces.
 I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong...


As usual, Steve Adams has some sage advice on the subject. Check out his article Planning Extents
http://www.ixora.com.au (click on Tips then on Planning Extents)
in which he mentions that there are reasons for keeping the number of extents down even in a locally managed tablespace.




RE: Locally Managed Tablespace Uniform Extent

2001-04-03 Thread Connor McDonald

I think its to keep the extents identifiable within
the segment header block - sort of in the same way
that oracle used to do in the earlier versions (which
limited the extents to 121, 249, 505 etc dependent on
block size)

hth
connor

--- Jacques Kilchoer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:   -Original Message-
  From: Miller, Jay
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  
  My understanding was that the main reason to keep
 the number 
  of extents down
  was in case you needed to drop or truncate the
 table it would 
  take Oracle a
  long time to clean up the fet$ table.
  I think, and I emphasize that I am not certain of
 this, that 
  this is no
  longer a problem with locally managed tablespaces.
  I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong...
 
 As usual, Steve Adams has some sage advice on the
 subject. Check out his
 article "Planning Extents"
 http://www.ixora.com.au (click on Tips then on
 Planning Extents)
 in which he mentions that there are reasons for
 keeping the number of
 extents down even in a locally managed tablespace.
 


=
Connor McDonald
http://www.oracledba.co.uk (mirrored at 
http://www.oradba.freeserve.co.uk)

"Some days you're the pigeon, some days you're the statue"


Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk
or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: =?iso-8859-1?q?Connor=20McDonald?=
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: Locally Managed Tablespace Uniform Extent

2001-03-15 Thread Connor McDonald

The advice on Metalink is sound in the sense that
using a finite number of extent sizes is a good thing,
but (imho) the choice of sizes for extents is largely
up to you (a point that the article doesn't really
convey).

The key with the uniform extent is avoiding
fragmentation issues; combine that with local mgt and
the dictionary contention issues pretty much disappear
as well.  I don't think the actual size of the extents
is relevant (once you get well above sizes relative to
the max physical read limit).

Thus if you've got 1G segments, just use a 50M or 100M
uniform extent sizes in the appropriate tablespaces.

My typical sizes are 256k,  2m, 20m and 200m.  

hth
connor


--- Jim Walski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  I
have to move a 7.3.4 database to 8i and I want to
 use the uniform extent
 size to reduce fragmentation.  I read the article
 "stop defragmenting and
 start living" and it indicates to have 3 extent
 sizes - 128K, 4M, 128M.
 
 I also read an article on Steve Adams site that
 indicates to keep the number
 of extents under (db_block_size/16) - 7 ( which in
 my case ( 8k block) would
 be 505 extents. )
 
 In the database I am moving there are some segments
 that are currently 1GB
 in size, if i was to put those in the 4M tablespace
 it would already have
 over 250 extents starting off.  Are there any other
 performance type issues
 to consider?
 
 Should I create another extent size between 4M and
 the 128M?  Maybe 64M
 increment?
 
 Thanks,
 Jim
 
 Jim Walski
 ClassicPlan
 Chino, CA 91710
 email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.classicplan.com
 
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ:
 http://www.orafaq.com
 -- 
 Author: Jim Walski
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX:
 (858) 538-5051
 San Diego, California-- Public Internet
 access / Mailing Lists


 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an
 E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of
 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB
 ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed
 from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information
 (like subscribing).


=
Connor McDonald
http://www.oracledba.co.uk (mirrored at 
http://www.oradba.freeserve.co.uk)

"Some days you're the pigeon, some days you're the statue"


Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk
or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: =?iso-8859-1?q?Connor=20McDonald?=
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Locally Managed Tablespace Uniform Extent

2001-03-14 Thread Jack C. Applewhite

Jim,

I'm probably a bit extreme here, but, with all due respect
to Steve Adams (because I really do), I wouldn't worry
terribly much about numbers of extents.

Our 8.1.6 production db on Win2k has 8KB block size and
uniform extent size of 1MB in all tablespaces.  Our largest
segment stores the out-of-line CLOBs of a partition of our
largest table - it has over 22,000 extents.  Another
partition has a CLOB segment of over 18,000 extents.  Since
we hit those segments by RowID during InterMedia Text index
queries, we've had absolutely no performance problems - we
get 1 to 5 second response times.  Actually, the InterMedia
Text index segments have over 1,000 extents.

A bunch of our tables with non-LOB data have hundreds of
extents as well, which probably puts them in line with
Steve's guidelines, but I wouldn't be worried if they got up
into the thousands of extents.

I'm sure there are numerous situations where different
extent sizes in different tablespaces makes sense.  Maybe
I'm just too lazy.  We don't have that many small tables
where 1MB extents waste a lot of space and, like I said, I
don't worry about too many extents, though if extents
approached the hundreds of thousands, I might create a
tablespace or two with large extents for those segments.
I've just not seen really convincing arguments that large
(but not huge) numbers of extents cause significant
performance problems, especially compared to the really BAD
SQL that Duhvelopers seem so fond of writing.   ;-)

A big advantage is that I can't even remember the last time
I worried about coelescing and fragmentation!

Jack


Jack C. Applewhite
Database Administrator/Developer
OCP Oracle8 DBA
iNetProfit, Inc.
Austin, Texas
www.iNetProfit.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
Jim Walski
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 2:10 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


I have to move a 7.3.4 database to 8i and I want to use the
uniform extent
size to reduce fragmentation.  I read the article "stop
defragmenting and
start living" and it indicates to have 3 extent sizes -
128K, 4M, 128M.

I also read an article on Steve Adams site that indicates to
keep the number
of extents under (db_block_size/16) - 7 ( which in my case
 8k block) would
be 505 extents. )

In the database I am moving there are some segments that are
currently 1GB
in size, if i was to put those in the 4M tablespace it would
already have
over 250 extents starting off.  Are there any other
performance type issues
to consider?

Should I create another extent size between 4M and the 128M?
Maybe 64M
increment?

Thanks,
Jim

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Jack C. Applewhite
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).