Re: linux

2004-01-19 Thread Mladen Gogala
I would probably go to the http://www.realtimelinuxfoundation.org and see what's there.
The next thing would be to start looking into other RT Unix systems and when all 
of the needed information is compiled, I would post an article with the solution on 
this list.


On 2004.01.19 09:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello list, sorry for the off topic question , but I thought that a question
 on unix would not ruffle too many feathers.
 
 what all changes will you make to convert  linux to a Real time operating
 system ?
 
 Can anyone please help me with an answer and explanation ?
 
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
 -- 
 Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
 San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
 -
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
 

-- 
Mladen Gogala
Oracle DBA
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Mladen Gogala
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


RE: linux

2004-01-19 Thread Bobak, Mark
Having never done it, I'll just refer you here:
http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/RTLinux-HOWTO.html

Mark J. Bobak
Oracle DBA
ProQuest Company
Ann Arbor, MI
Imagination was given to man to compensate him for what he is not, and
a sense of humor was provided to console him for what he is.  --Unknown


-Original Message-

Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 9:54 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Hello list, sorry for the off topic question , but I thought that a
question
on unix would not ruffle too many feathers.

what all changes will you make to convert  linux to a Real time
operating
system ?

Can anyone please help me with an answer and explanation ?

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Bobak, Mark
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


Re: Linux

2003-12-23 Thread Mihalis I. Tsoukalos
On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 02:34:26PM -0800, Paul Drake wrote:
 --- Seema Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hi
  Does anyone know good Linux administration book?
  Can you guyes suggest any good linux user group?
  thx
  -Seema
 
 Matt Welsh's Running Linux is now out in 4th
 Edition.
 Just make sure that you find a recent edition, as
 there are still plenty of RedHat 6.0 books out there
 on the shelves.

Linux System Administration Handbook
Prentice Hall PTR; ISBN: 0130084662

cheers,
Mihalis.

-- 
 14:00:56 up 6 days, 22:33,  2 users,  load average: 0.03, 0.03, 0.00
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Mihalis I. Tsoukalos
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


Re: Linux

2003-12-20 Thread Paul Drake
--- Seema Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi
 Does anyone know good Linux administration book?
 Can you guyes suggest any good linux user group?
 thx
 -Seema

Matt Welsh's Running Linux is now out in 4th
Edition.
Just make sure that you find a recent edition, as
there are still plenty of RedHat 6.0 books out there
on the shelves.

where might you be located?

If you're in the New York Metropolitan area,
LinuxWorldExpo will be held Jan 21-24 at Javitts.
They typically have a .org pavillion where the LUGs
have booths.

The NYLUG website has a good list of area Linux User
Groups - http://www.nylug.org

I haven't been attending NYLUG for awhile, but its one
of my new year's resolutions to start doing so. They
used to have some pretty good speakers, such as lead
developers for Apache, Eric Raymond. Beers afterwards
at Typhoon Brewery.

hth.

Pd

__
Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing.
http://photos.yahoo.com/
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Paul Drake
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


Re: Linux install for Oracle - Details reqd

2003-12-16 Thread Mladen Gogala

On 12/16/2003 03:29:25 PM, quriyat  wrote:
 
 Hello all
 
 I am planning to install Linux; the idea is to install Oracle RAC.
 I have two questions:
 
 Q1. Which Linux is best suited for it(RH?/SUSE?/Mandrake?).
 I know i can get Oracle download from OTN but it should be 
 installable on the particular flavor of Linux. Also, i would
 like to know which Linux will have comparitively lesser efforts
 to go thru the install and get me started at the earliest.

RH AS 3.0

 
 Q2. Has anyone tried Oracle RAC on any of the above. If so what
 are the experience/problems encountered.

return (sub { www.puschitz.com; })

 
 TIA
 
 Quriyat DBA
 
 
 ___
 No banners. No pop-ups. No kidding.
 Introducing My Way - http://www.myway.com
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
 -- 
 Author: quriyat 
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
 San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
 -
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
 

Mladen Gogala
Oracle DBA
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Mladen Gogala
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


Re: Linux VPN and routing HOWTO

2003-09-26 Thread Matthew Zito
Title: OT: Linux VPN and routing HOWTO




Is IP forwarding enabled? cat 
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward ? If its a zero, set it to a 1 (echo 1  
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward)

Beyond that, use a packet sniffer like tcpdump to 
see what is appearing on the wire on both interfaces.

Thanks,
Matt


  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Jack van 
  Zanen 
  To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L 
  
  Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 9:44 
  AM
  Subject: OT: Linux VPN and routing 
  HOWTO
  
  Hi 
  I'm Sorry to put this way OT subject here, but you 
  guys usually come up with the answer anyway. 
  I'm trying to setup my linux at home so that I can 
  VPN into it. Now I can connect already but can't ping or connect any of 
  the machines in my network. I huess I have to setup some sort of routing now, 
  but I can't find any a-z documentation on this topic.
  I used the PPtP VPN sever that came with United 
  linux 
  Once again sorry. 
  Jack 



RE: LINUX instance startup problem

2003-07-03 Thread Weaver, Walt
What version of Red Hat?

--Walt

 -Original Message-
 From: Seema Singh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 1:09 PM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 Subject: LINUX instance startup problem
 
 Hi,
 I'm having problem during startup of instance on LINUX.I have oracle
8.1.7
 on red hat.
 When I start instance it try to come upto  this below lines
 background_dump_dest =
 user_dump_dest   =
 core_dump_dest   =
 
 after that I'm getting following message
 SVRMGR connect internal;
 Connected.
 SVRMGR startup;
 ORA-03113: end-of-file on communication channel
 SVRMGR connect internal;
 Password: ORA-03113: end-of-file on communication channel
 SVRMGR
 When I see semaphore and shared memory.Its locked.I'm unable to get
into
 server manager without killing all shared mem process.
 Let me know how to fix this problem pl
 thx
 -seema
 
 _
 MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*
 http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
 
 --
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
 --
 Author: Seema Singh
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
 San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
 -
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Weaver, Walt
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


Re: LINUX instance startup problem

2003-07-03 Thread James J. Morrow
Most modern versions of linux have shared memory/semaphore parameters set high 
enough that oracle can start (unless, of course, you have an exceptionally large 
SGA).  (Note 187397.1)

If this is a fresh install (in particular a download from OTN) of 8.1.7, locate 
the glibc-2.1.3-stubs.tar.gz patch from Oracle. 
(http://otn.oracle.com/software/products/oracle8i/htdocs/linuxsoft.html).

There is also a good document entitled:  Oracle RDBMS OTN Downloads: Files, 
Sizes and Directions (Note 209555.1)

-- James

Seema Singh wrote:
Hi,
I'm having problem during startup of instance on LINUX.I have oracle 
8.1.7 on red hat.
When I start instance it try to come upto  this below lines
background_dump_dest =
user_dump_dest   =
core_dump_dest   =

after that I'm getting following message
SVRMGR connect internal;
Connected.
SVRMGR startup;
ORA-03113: end-of-file on communication channel
SVRMGR connect internal;
Password: ORA-03113: end-of-file on communication channel
SVRMGR
When I see semaphore and shared memory.Its locked.I'm unable to get into 
server manager without killing all shared mem process.
Let me know how to fix this problem pl
thx
-seema

_
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus



--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: James J. Morrow
 INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


Re: linux and windows2000 memory allocation

2003-06-23 Thread Tanel Poder
Hi!

Linux doesn't split memory that way (although some memory is still allocated
to kernel of course)
Max SGA I have allocated on 32bit server w. 8GB mem running RHAS 2.1 is
2.4G. The max is 2.7GB I believe, but you have to relocate SGA for that.
Check metalink note 211424.1.

In addition, you can use extended buffer cache, but for that you need PAE
(page address extension) capable hardware and need to create memory file
systems etc..

Metalink note above covers the topic.

Tanel.

- Original Message - 
My question is:

 How does Red Hat Advanced Server handle memory?  If you have a 4G Dell
 server, how much of that memory can be made available to the Oracle
 software?

 Regards,
 Patrice.


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Tanel Poder
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


Re: ??? Linux/Oracle 8.1.7 2GB file size limit ???

2003-06-13 Thread Yechiel Adar
DO NOT USE AUTOEXTEND on these datafiles.

There is a bug when datafile autoextend into 2GB or 4GB (I do not remember
exactly now) on NT.
We had a database down permanently because of this.

We do not work with any X OS here so I am talking about NT only.

Yechiel Adar
Mehish
- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 7:34 PM


 FWIW, we use 2048m here.

 --Walt (who feels obligated to make some posts since Steve's off today)
Weaver
   Bozeman, Montana

  -Original Message-
  From: Jared Still [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 11:00 AM
  To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
  Subject: Re: ??? Linux/Oracle 8.1.7 2GB file size limit ???
 
 
 
  Just curious how you arrived at the 1900 meg number.
 
  Why not use 2000m?
 
  Oracle defines gigabytes in binary, not decimal as
  drive mfg's do, so 2000m would be fine.
 
  Not a criticism, just wondering.
 
  Jared
 
  On Sunday 08 June 2003 09:29, Yechiel Adar wrote:
   We have been hit by a bug in autoextend that corrupted a
  database (8.1.6)
   on NT.
   It seems that the bug was exported to Linux as well.
  
   We now use all datafiles with autoextend up to 1900 MB.
   We also define a second datafile with 200MB initial and
  autoextend to 1900
   MB.
   Whenever the last datafile starts to grow we define a new
  one with 200MB
   etc.
  
   Seems to work so far.
  
   Yechiel Adar
   Mehish
   - Original Message -
   To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:40 PM
  
I've just been informed that there is a 2GB datafile size
  limit with
  
   Oracle 8.1.7 on Linux... PERIOD. This despite the fact that
  we've had files
   in excess of this for some time and they work just fine.
  The problem occurs
   when the autoextend feature reaches the 2GB threshhold.
  Of course, Oracle
   didn't tell me this until after about 4 days of back and
  forth testing for
   them. (There is no such O/S file size limit.) I've reviewed
  the Linux
   release notes, the Linux install guide, the Linux admin
  guide and the
   contents of $ORACLE_HOME/relnotes and I don't find any such
  limitation in
   the documentation. Did I miss it? Can anyone find any such published
   limitation in the docs? Is this a secret?
  
Peeved at Oracle... AGAIN,
Steve Orr
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: Orr, Steve
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051
  http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web
  hosting services
   
  -
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of
  'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed
  from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like
  subscribing).
 
  --
  Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
  --
  Author: Jared Still
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
  San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
  -
  To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
  to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
  the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
  (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
  also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
 
 --
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
 --
 Author: Weaver, Walt
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
 San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
 -
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Yechiel Adar
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing

RE: ??? Linux/Oracle 8.1.7 2GB file size limit ???

2003-06-09 Thread Weaver, Walt
FWIW, we use 2048m here. 

--Walt (who feels obligated to make some posts since Steve's off today) Weaver
  Bozeman, Montana

 -Original Message-
 From: Jared Still [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 11:00 AM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 Subject: Re: ??? Linux/Oracle 8.1.7 2GB file size limit ???
 
 
 
 Just curious how you arrived at the 1900 meg number.
 
 Why not use 2000m?
 
 Oracle defines gigabytes in binary, not decimal as
 drive mfg's do, so 2000m would be fine.
 
 Not a criticism, just wondering.
 
 Jared
 
 On Sunday 08 June 2003 09:29, Yechiel Adar wrote:
  We have been hit by a bug in autoextend that corrupted a 
 database (8.1.6)
  on NT.
  It seems that the bug was exported to Linux as well.
 
  We now use all datafiles with autoextend up to 1900 MB.
  We also define a second datafile with 200MB initial and 
 autoextend to 1900
  MB.
  Whenever the last datafile starts to grow we define a new 
 one with 200MB
  etc.
 
  Seems to work so far.
 
  Yechiel Adar
  Mehish
  - Original Message -
  To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:40 PM
 
   I've just been informed that there is a 2GB datafile size 
 limit with
 
  Oracle 8.1.7 on Linux... PERIOD. This despite the fact that 
 we've had files
  in excess of this for some time and they work just fine. 
 The problem occurs
  when the autoextend feature reaches the 2GB threshhold. 
 Of course, Oracle
  didn't tell me this until after about 4 days of back and 
 forth testing for
  them. (There is no such O/S file size limit.) I've reviewed 
 the Linux
  release notes, the Linux install guide, the Linux admin 
 guide and the
  contents of $ORACLE_HOME/relnotes and I don't find any such 
 limitation in
  the documentation. Did I miss it? Can anyone find any such published
  limitation in the docs? Is this a secret?
 
   Peeved at Oracle... AGAIN,
   Steve Orr
   --
   Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
   --
   Author: Orr, Steve
 INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
   Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 
 http://www.fatcity.com
   San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web 
 hosting services
   
 -
   To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
   to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 
 'ListGuru') and in
   the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
   (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed 
 from).  You may
   also send the HELP command for other information (like 
 subscribing).
 
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
 -- 
 Author: Jared Still
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
 San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
 -
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
 
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Weaver, Walt
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


Re: ??? Linux/Oracle 8.1.7 2GB file size limit ???

2003-06-08 Thread Yechiel Adar
We have been hit by a bug in autoextend that corrupted a database (8.1.6) on
NT.
It seems that the bug was exported to Linux as well.

We now use all datafiles with autoextend up to 1900 MB.
We also define a second datafile with 200MB initial and autoextend to 1900
MB.
Whenever the last datafile starts to grow we define a new one with 200MB
etc.

Seems to work so far.

Yechiel Adar
Mehish
- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:40 PM


 I've just been informed that there is a 2GB datafile size limit with
Oracle 8.1.7 on Linux... PERIOD. This despite the fact that we've had files
in excess of this for some time and they work just fine. The problem occurs
when the autoextend feature reaches the 2GB threshhold. Of course, Oracle
didn't tell me this until after about 4 days of back and forth testing for
them. (There is no such O/S file size limit.) I've reviewed the Linux
release notes, the Linux install guide, the Linux admin guide and the
contents of $ORACLE_HOME/relnotes and I don't find any such limitation in
the documentation. Did I miss it? Can anyone find any such published
limitation in the docs? Is this a secret?


 Peeved at Oracle... AGAIN,
 Steve Orr
 --
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
 --
 Author: Orr, Steve
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
 San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
 -
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Yechiel Adar
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


Re: ??? Linux/Oracle 8.1.7 2GB file size limit ???

2003-06-08 Thread Jared Still

Just curious how you arrived at the 1900 meg number.

Why not use 2000m?

Oracle defines gigabytes in binary, not decimal as
drive mfg's do, so 2000m would be fine.

Not a criticism, just wondering.

Jared

On Sunday 08 June 2003 09:29, Yechiel Adar wrote:
 We have been hit by a bug in autoextend that corrupted a database (8.1.6)
 on NT.
 It seems that the bug was exported to Linux as well.

 We now use all datafiles with autoextend up to 1900 MB.
 We also define a second datafile with 200MB initial and autoextend to 1900
 MB.
 Whenever the last datafile starts to grow we define a new one with 200MB
 etc.

 Seems to work so far.

 Yechiel Adar
 Mehish
 - Original Message -
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:40 PM

  I've just been informed that there is a 2GB datafile size limit with

 Oracle 8.1.7 on Linux... PERIOD. This despite the fact that we've had files
 in excess of this for some time and they work just fine. The problem occurs
 when the autoextend feature reaches the 2GB threshhold. Of course, Oracle
 didn't tell me this until after about 4 days of back and forth testing for
 them. (There is no such O/S file size limit.) I've reviewed the Linux
 release notes, the Linux install guide, the Linux admin guide and the
 contents of $ORACLE_HOME/relnotes and I don't find any such limitation in
 the documentation. Did I miss it? Can anyone find any such published
 limitation in the docs? Is this a secret?

  Peeved at Oracle... AGAIN,
  Steve Orr
  --
  Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
  --
  Author: Orr, Steve
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
  San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
  -
  To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
  to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
  the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
  (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
  also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Jared Still
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


Re: ??? Linux/Oracle 8.1.7 2GB file size limit ???

2003-06-08 Thread Mladen Gogala
The critical boundary on 32-bit filesystems was 2048M. The problem 
was (and still is) in the lseek function, which accepts int

off_t lseek(int fildes, off_t offset, int whence);

In order to move through the files larger then 2GB (1 bit is for the sign), OS
needs routines named lseek64 and tell64 which accept 64 bit values. That doesn't
necessarily mean that the OS itself is 64-bit. That can be determined by 
finding sizeof(char *). If the returned number is 8, you are on a 64 system. 
There are some operating systems which have eliminated the sign and extended 
that boundary to 4GB, but that causes other problems, most notably with NFS
because the other systems, which adhere to the POSIX specification don't know
what to do with a 4GB file. One  of such OSes was Dynix, may it rest in peace.





On 2003.06.08 12:59 Jared Still wrote:
 
 Just curious how you arrived at the 1900 meg number.
 
 Why not use 2000m?
 
 Oracle defines gigabytes in binary, not decimal as
 drive mfg's do, so 2000m would be fine.
 
 Not a criticism, just wondering.
 
 Jared
 
 On Sunday 08 June 2003 09:29, Yechiel Adar wrote:
  We have been hit by a bug in autoextend that corrupted a database (8.1.6)
  on NT.
  It seems that the bug was exported to Linux as well.
 
  We now use all datafiles with autoextend up to 1900 MB.
  We also define a second datafile with 200MB initial and autoextend to 1900
  MB.
  Whenever the last datafile starts to grow we define a new one with 200MB
  etc.
 
  Seems to work so far.
 
  Yechiel Adar
  Mehish
  - Original Message -
  To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:40 PM
 
   I've just been informed that there is a 2GB datafile size limit with
 
  Oracle 8.1.7 on Linux... PERIOD. This despite the fact that we've had files
  in excess of this for some time and they work just fine. The problem occurs
  when the autoextend feature reaches the 2GB threshhold. Of course, Oracle
  didn't tell me this until after about 4 days of back and forth testing for
  them. (There is no such O/S file size limit.) I've reviewed the Linux
  release notes, the Linux install guide, the Linux admin guide and the
  contents of $ORACLE_HOME/relnotes and I don't find any such limitation in
  the documentation. Did I miss it? Can anyone find any such published
  limitation in the docs? Is this a secret?
 
   Peeved at Oracle... AGAIN,
   Steve Orr
   --
   Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
   --
   Author: Orr, Steve
 INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
   Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
   San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
   -
   To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
   to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
   the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
   (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
   also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
 
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
 -- 
 Author: Jared Still
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
 San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
 -
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
 

-- 
Mladen Gogala
Oracle DBA
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Mladen Gogala
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


RE: ??? Linux/Oracle 8.1.7 2GB file size limit ???

2003-06-05 Thread Mark Leith
That could be quite a LARGE update.. ;)

-Original Message-
Carmichael
Sent: 05 June 2003 01:49
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


geez, back to the very very first presentation Marlene Theriault and I
did together, about version 6, called All the Things THEY Didn't Tell
You

you mean I hafta update it AGAIN?

:)

--- Orr, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 And thanks for the note recommendation Dennis...
 
 There's too many of these bullets flying around. Need a short list
 called: Things you should know that Oracle doesn't tell you straight
 out. 
 
 Of course there's the bug list but who has time for that and can
 remember it all? Sigh...
 
 
 Steve
 
 
 -Original Message-
 Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:40 PM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 
 
 Steve
Personally I am VERY glad you mentioned this today. Since I run
 64-bit
 Unix, I didn't think this applied to me, but after reading the note,
 I ran
 their formula and found a file on one of my databases that was very
 close to
 the limit. Plenty happy to dodge that bullet.
 
 Dennis Williams
 DBA, 80%OCP, 100% DBA
 Lifetouch, Inc.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:15 PM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 
 
 We are on 8.1.7.4 and it aflicted us anyway. Maybe I'll just wait a
 couple
 of years and let other customers QA this Oracle feature until they
 get it
 right.
 
 
 Steve
 
 
 -Original Message-
 Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 2:35 PM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 
 
 Ahem . . . according to Note 112011.1, these problems can affect all
 platforms except OS/390 which does NOT support datafile resizing
 (fiendishly clever those mainframe types). 
 It looks like 8.1.7.4 and above is not affected. I would highly
 recommend
 that all Oracle DBAs take a look at this note.
 
 Dennis Williams
 DBA, 80%OCP, 100% DBA
 Lifetouch, Inc.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:00 PM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 
 
 It doesn't seem to be a problem on other platforms... Just when I
 stopped
 feeling like a neglected step child for running on Linux. Don't
 worry... Be
 happy... There's a workaround... Upgrade and buy more software...
 
 D'ai jobu desu... er, eh, Ca ne fais rien.
 
 
 -Original Message-
 Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:46 PM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 
 
 This almost sounds like the problem that existed for Oracle 7.3 and
 the 2G
 threshold a couple of years ago...
 
 J'ai une impression d'avoir dij` vu ceci.
 
 : )
 
 Patrice.
 
 -Original Message-
 Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:10 PM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 
 
 Steve - are you saying that there is a workaround by increasing the
 size of
 the file manually to something larger than 4G?
 
 Tom Mercadante
 Oracle Certified Professional
 
 
 -Original Message-
 Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 1:25 PM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 
 
 See my note: There is no such O/S file size limit.
 
 We have datafiles  2GB which work just fine. The problem is with
 autoextending datafiles that extend from 2GB to 2GB. It's not a
 Linux
 limitation but a limitation imposed by Oracle's implementation on
 Linux.
 Oracle 9i on Linux doesn't have this problem. And my peeve is that it
 took
 OWS 4 days to discover this limit.
 
 
 Still peeved,  :-)
 Steve
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:55 AM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 
 
 I think it is the limitation of Linux, not Oracle.
 Use LVM and don't worry about file size limit. :-)
 
 JP
 - Original Message - 
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:40 PM
 
 
  I've just been informed that there is a 2GB datafile size limit
 with
 Oracle 8.1.7 on Linux... PERIOD. This despite the fact that we've had
 files
 in excess of this for some time and they work just fine. The problem
 occurs
 when the autoextend feature reaches the 2GB threshhold. Of course,
 Oracle
 didn't tell me this until after about 4 days of back and forth
 testing for
 them. (There is no such O/S file size limit.) I've reviewed the Linux
 release notes, the Linux install guide, the Linux admin guide and the
 contents of $ORACLE_HOME/relnotes and I don't find any such
 limitation in
 the documentation. Did I miss it? Can anyone find any such published
 limitation in the docs? Is this a secret?
 
 
  Peeved at Oracle... AGAIN,
  Steve Orr
  -- 
  Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
  -- 
  Author: Orr, Steve
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
  San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting
 services
 
 -
  To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
  to: 

Re: ??? Linux/Oracle 8.1.7 2GB file size limit ???

2003-06-05 Thread Jan Pruner
I think it is the limitation of Linux, not Oracle.
Use LVM and don't worry about file size limit. :-)

JP
- Original Message - 
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:40 PM


 I've just been informed that there is a 2GB datafile size limit with
Oracle 8.1.7 on Linux... PERIOD. This despite the fact that we've had files
in excess of this for some time and they work just fine. The problem occurs
when the autoextend feature reaches the 2GB threshhold. Of course, Oracle
didn't tell me this until after about 4 days of back and forth testing for
them. (There is no such O/S file size limit.) I've reviewed the Linux
release notes, the Linux install guide, the Linux admin guide and the
contents of $ORACLE_HOME/relnotes and I don't find any such limitation in
the documentation. Did I miss it? Can anyone find any such published
limitation in the docs? Is this a secret?


 Peeved at Oracle... AGAIN,
 Steve Orr
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
 -- 
 Author: Orr, Steve
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
 San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
 -
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Jan Pruner
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: ??? Linux/Oracle 8.1.7 2GB file size limit ???

2003-06-05 Thread Branimir Petrovic
I'd say file size limit/autoextend feature has been Oracle's
dirty little secret for quite a while. For a very long period
of time there was similar 4GB 'magic' barrier on Windows, that 
was allegedly fixed. Workaround for the problem was to create
datafile 1 MB larger than the 'magic' number, and ether resize 
it using this trick or add another datafile to tablespace when 
the time comes (whenever MagicNumber or N x MagicNumber is close).

Despite rumours (of having fixed autoextend feature on Windows)
I recently witnessed failed imports into Oracle 9.2.0.1.0 
caused by too small tablespaces that just wouldn't autoextend.
Interestingly, import died beautifully cuz silently in the
middle of job without _any_ errors, traces etc. Just gone.

There is also interesting myth here at the place where I work
that systems tablespace autoextend feature ain't to be trusted
as it is known to have caused intermittent data dictionary 
corruptions while code recompilation takes place under space 
crunch conditions... 
 
On slightly cynical side note: autoextend that doesn't - maps
nicely into job safety ;-)

Branimir

 -Original Message-
 From: Orr, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: June 4, 2003 11:40 AM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 Subject: ??? Linux/Oracle 8.1.7 2GB file size limit ???
 
 
 I've just been informed that there is a 2GB datafile size 
 limit with Oracle 8.1.7 on Linux... PERIOD. This despite the 
 fact that we've had files in excess of this for some time and 
 they work just fine. The problem occurs when the autoextend 
 feature reaches the 2GB threshhold. Of course, Oracle 
 didn't tell me this until after about 4 days of back and 
 forth testing for them. (There is no such O/S file size 
 limit.) I've reviewed the Linux release notes, the Linux 
 install guide, the Linux admin guide and the contents of 
 $ORACLE_HOME/relnotes and I don't find any such limitation in 
 the documentation. Did I miss it? Can anyone find any such 
 published limitation in the docs? Is this a secret? 
 
 
 Peeved at Oracle... AGAIN,
 Steve Orr
 -- 
 
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Branimir Petrovic
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: ??? Linux/Oracle 8.1.7 2GB file size limit ???

2003-06-05 Thread Orr, Steve
See my note: There is no such O/S file size limit.

We have datafiles  2GB which work just fine. The problem is with autoextending 
datafiles that extend from 2GB to 2GB. It's not a Linux limitation but a limitation 
imposed by Oracle's implementation on Linux. Oracle 9i on Linux doesn't have this 
problem. And my peeve is that it took OWS 4 days to discover this limit.


Still peeved,  :-)
Steve



-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:55 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


I think it is the limitation of Linux, not Oracle.
Use LVM and don't worry about file size limit. :-)

JP
- Original Message - 
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:40 PM


 I've just been informed that there is a 2GB datafile size limit with
Oracle 8.1.7 on Linux... PERIOD. This despite the fact that we've had files
in excess of this for some time and they work just fine. The problem occurs
when the autoextend feature reaches the 2GB threshhold. Of course, Oracle
didn't tell me this until after about 4 days of back and forth testing for
them. (There is no such O/S file size limit.) I've reviewed the Linux
release notes, the Linux install guide, the Linux admin guide and the
contents of $ORACLE_HOME/relnotes and I don't find any such limitation in
the documentation. Did I miss it? Can anyone find any such published
limitation in the docs? Is this a secret?


 Peeved at Oracle... AGAIN,
 Steve Orr
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
 -- 
 Author: Orr, Steve
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
 San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
 -
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Jan Pruner
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Orr, Steve
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: ??? Linux/Oracle 8.1.7 2GB file size limit ???

2003-06-05 Thread Mercadante, Thomas F
Steve - are you saying that there is a workaround by increasing the size of
the file manually to something larger than 4G?

Tom Mercadante
Oracle Certified Professional


-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 1:25 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


See my note: There is no such O/S file size limit.

We have datafiles  2GB which work just fine. The problem is with
autoextending datafiles that extend from 2GB to 2GB. It's not a Linux
limitation but a limitation imposed by Oracle's implementation on Linux.
Oracle 9i on Linux doesn't have this problem. And my peeve is that it took
OWS 4 days to discover this limit.


Still peeved,  :-)
Steve



-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:55 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


I think it is the limitation of Linux, not Oracle.
Use LVM and don't worry about file size limit. :-)

JP
- Original Message - 
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:40 PM


 I've just been informed that there is a 2GB datafile size limit with
Oracle 8.1.7 on Linux... PERIOD. This despite the fact that we've had files
in excess of this for some time and they work just fine. The problem occurs
when the autoextend feature reaches the 2GB threshhold. Of course, Oracle
didn't tell me this until after about 4 days of back and forth testing for
them. (There is no such O/S file size limit.) I've reviewed the Linux
release notes, the Linux install guide, the Linux admin guide and the
contents of $ORACLE_HOME/relnotes and I don't find any such limitation in
the documentation. Did I miss it? Can anyone find any such published
limitation in the docs? Is this a secret?


 Peeved at Oracle... AGAIN,
 Steve Orr
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
 -- 
 Author: Orr, Steve
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
 San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
 -
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Jan Pruner
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Orr, Steve
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Mercadante, Thomas F
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: ??? Linux/Oracle 8.1.7 2GB file size limit ???

2003-06-05 Thread Orr, Steve
NICE! Thanks.

-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 11:57 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L




It's a combo problem between oracle and linux.  When Linux first
implemented largefile support, many of the traditional linux apps were
not aware of the concept of 2GB files and were using 32-bit offsets for
file pointer storage.  So, as a workaround, 32- and 64-bit versions of
the various file operation calls were made to specify whether a 32-bit
or 64-bit offset should be returned, as well as specifying a flag
O_LARGEFILE that could be sent to the traditional open() that indicated
the application was largefile aware.  When an application is compiled,
you can specify to the compiler that you want it to be 64-bit aware and
the 64-bit versions of things like open and seek will be used, or the
code can use the O_LARGEFILE flag in open().  The end result of this is
that while linux is 2GB aware, oracle 8.1.7 is not quite entirely.  I
bet that the chunk of code that opens a datafile for traditional access
in 8.1.7 is 64-bit aware, while the code that grows the file is not.  

Thanks,
Matt

--
Matthew Zito
GridApp Systems
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cell: 646-220-3551
Phone: 212-358-8211 x 359 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Jan Pruner
 Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 11:55 AM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 Subject: Re: ??? Linux/Oracle 8.1.7 2GB file size limit ???
 
 
 I think it is the limitation of Linux, not Oracle.
 Use LVM and don't worry about file size limit. :-)
 
 JP
 - Original Message - 
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:40 PM
 
 
  I've just been informed that there is a 2GB datafile size limit with
 Oracle 8.1.7 on Linux... PERIOD. This despite the fact that 
 we've had files in excess of this for some time and they work 
 just fine. The problem occurs when the autoextend feature 
 reaches the 2GB threshhold. Of course, Oracle didn't tell me 
 this until after about 4 days of back and forth testing for 
 them. (There is no such O/S file size limit.) I've reviewed 
 the Linux release notes, the Linux install guide, the Linux 
 admin guide and the contents of $ORACLE_HOME/relnotes and I 
 don't find any such limitation in the documentation. Did I 
 miss it? Can anyone find any such published limitation in the 
 docs? Is this a secret?
 
 
  Peeved at Oracle... AGAIN,
  Steve Orr
  --
  Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
  -- 
  Author: Orr, Steve
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
  San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web 
 hosting services
  
 -
  To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
  to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in 
  the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the 
  name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may 
 also send 
  the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
 
 
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
 -- 
 Author: Jan Pruner
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
 San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
 -
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') 
 and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB 
 ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed 
 from).  You may also send the HELP command for other 
 information (like subscribing).
 
 

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Matthew Zito
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Orr, Steve
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line

RE: ??? Linux/Oracle 8.1.7 2GB file size limit ???

2003-06-05 Thread Matthew Zito


It's a combo problem between oracle and linux.  When Linux first
implemented largefile support, many of the traditional linux apps were
not aware of the concept of 2GB files and were using 32-bit offsets for
file pointer storage.  So, as a workaround, 32- and 64-bit versions of
the various file operation calls were made to specify whether a 32-bit
or 64-bit offset should be returned, as well as specifying a flag
O_LARGEFILE that could be sent to the traditional open() that indicated
the application was largefile aware.  When an application is compiled,
you can specify to the compiler that you want it to be 64-bit aware and
the 64-bit versions of things like open and seek will be used, or the
code can use the O_LARGEFILE flag in open().  The end result of this is
that while linux is 2GB aware, oracle 8.1.7 is not quite entirely.  I
bet that the chunk of code that opens a datafile for traditional access
in 8.1.7 is 64-bit aware, while the code that grows the file is not.  

Thanks,
Matt

--
Matthew Zito
GridApp Systems
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cell: 646-220-3551
Phone: 212-358-8211 x 359 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Jan Pruner
 Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 11:55 AM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 Subject: Re: ??? Linux/Oracle 8.1.7 2GB file size limit ???
 
 
 I think it is the limitation of Linux, not Oracle.
 Use LVM and don't worry about file size limit. :-)
 
 JP
 - Original Message - 
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:40 PM
 
 
  I've just been informed that there is a 2GB datafile size limit with
 Oracle 8.1.7 on Linux... PERIOD. This despite the fact that 
 we've had files in excess of this for some time and they work 
 just fine. The problem occurs when the autoextend feature 
 reaches the 2GB threshhold. Of course, Oracle didn't tell me 
 this until after about 4 days of back and forth testing for 
 them. (There is no such O/S file size limit.) I've reviewed 
 the Linux release notes, the Linux install guide, the Linux 
 admin guide and the contents of $ORACLE_HOME/relnotes and I 
 don't find any such limitation in the documentation. Did I 
 miss it? Can anyone find any such published limitation in the 
 docs? Is this a secret?
 
 
  Peeved at Oracle... AGAIN,
  Steve Orr
  --
  Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
  -- 
  Author: Orr, Steve
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
  San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web 
 hosting services
  
 -
  To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
  to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in 
  the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the 
  name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may 
 also send 
  the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
 
 
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
 -- 
 Author: Jan Pruner
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
 San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
 -
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') 
 and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB 
 ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed 
 from).  You may also send the HELP command for other 
 information (like subscribing).
 
 

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Matthew Zito
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: ??? Linux/Oracle 8.1.7 2GB file size limit ???

2003-06-05 Thread Orr, Steve
Thanks Branimir for confirming my right to be peeved. :-)

I never liked the autoextend feature but we use it because:
1) We have this nifty end user driven feature where they can clone their data via a 
nice web GUI interface. (This is for web site upgrades scheduled by the end user.)
2) We don't want the user to decide how much disk storage to allocate so we let the 
datafiles autoextend. 
3) As the DBA/DUHveloper (Python/CGI) who bequeathed certain DBA functions to the 
GUI interface, I depended on autoextend working and was too lazy to algorithm-ize 
the number of datafiles based on current storage needs.
4) Upon self-chastizement I'm undoing the autoextend feature and am now going to 
dba_segments to develop a capacity planning algorithm.

Developing DBA automation tools driven via events and end user input is a fun and wild 
ride on the margin of DBA fiefdom. 

Commiserating with my DBA buddy Walt, Help... we're losing control and we hate giving 
up 'power.' :-)


Staring out the window at the mountains in Big Sky Country,
Steve



-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 11:25 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


I'd say file size limit/autoextend feature has been Oracle's
dirty little secret for quite a while. For a very long period
of time there was similar 4GB 'magic' barrier on Windows, that 
was allegedly fixed. Workaround for the problem was to create
datafile 1 MB larger than the 'magic' number, and ether resize 
it using this trick or add another datafile to tablespace when 
the time comes (whenever MagicNumber or N x MagicNumber is close).

Despite rumours (of having fixed autoextend feature on Windows)
I recently witnessed failed imports into Oracle 9.2.0.1.0 
caused by too small tablespaces that just wouldn't autoextend.
Interestingly, import died beautifully cuz silently in the
middle of job without _any_ errors, traces etc. Just gone.

There is also interesting myth here at the place where I work
that systems tablespace autoextend feature ain't to be trusted
as it is known to have caused intermittent data dictionary 
corruptions while code recompilation takes place under space 
crunch conditions... 
 
On slightly cynical side note: autoextend that doesn't - maps
nicely into job safety ;-)

Branimir

 -Original Message-
 From: Orr, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: June 4, 2003 11:40 AM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 Subject: ??? Linux/Oracle 8.1.7 2GB file size limit ???
 
 
 I've just been informed that there is a 2GB datafile size 
 limit with Oracle 8.1.7 on Linux... PERIOD. This despite the 
 fact that we've had files in excess of this for some time and 
 they work just fine. The problem occurs when the autoextend 
 feature reaches the 2GB threshhold. Of course, Oracle 
 didn't tell me this until after about 4 days of back and 
 forth testing for them. (There is no such O/S file size 
 limit.) I've reviewed the Linux release notes, the Linux 
 install guide, the Linux admin guide and the contents of 
 $ORACLE_HOME/relnotes and I don't find any such limitation in 
 the documentation. Did I miss it? Can anyone find any such 
 published limitation in the docs? Is this a secret? 
 
 
 Peeved at Oracle... AGAIN,
 Steve Orr
 -- 
 
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Branimir Petrovic
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Orr, Steve
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: ??? Linux/Oracle 8.1.7 2GB file size limit ???

2003-06-05 Thread Boivin, Patrice J
This almost sounds like the problem that existed for Oracle 7.3 and the 2G
threshold a couple of years ago...

J'ai une impression d'avoir déjà vu ceci.

: )

Patrice.

-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:10 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Steve - are you saying that there is a workaround by increasing the size of
the file manually to something larger than 4G?

Tom Mercadante
Oracle Certified Professional


-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 1:25 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


See my note: There is no such O/S file size limit.

We have datafiles  2GB which work just fine. The problem is with
autoextending datafiles that extend from 2GB to 2GB. It's not a Linux
limitation but a limitation imposed by Oracle's implementation on Linux.
Oracle 9i on Linux doesn't have this problem. And my peeve is that it took
OWS 4 days to discover this limit.


Still peeved,  :-)
Steve



-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:55 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


I think it is the limitation of Linux, not Oracle.
Use LVM and don't worry about file size limit. :-)

JP
- Original Message - 
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:40 PM


 I've just been informed that there is a 2GB datafile size limit with
Oracle 8.1.7 on Linux... PERIOD. This despite the fact that we've had files
in excess of this for some time and they work just fine. The problem occurs
when the autoextend feature reaches the 2GB threshhold. Of course, Oracle
didn't tell me this until after about 4 days of back and forth testing for
them. (There is no such O/S file size limit.) I've reviewed the Linux
release notes, the Linux install guide, the Linux admin guide and the
contents of $ORACLE_HOME/relnotes and I don't find any such limitation in
the documentation. Did I miss it? Can anyone find any such published
limitation in the docs? Is this a secret?


 Peeved at Oracle... AGAIN,
 Steve Orr
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
 -- 
 Author: Orr, Steve
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
 San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
 -
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Jan Pruner
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Orr, Steve
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Mercadante, Thomas F
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Boivin, Patrice J
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To 

RE: ??? Linux/Oracle 8.1.7 2GB file size limit ???

2003-06-05 Thread Orr, Steve
Well... datafiles  2GB seem to work okay but since Oracle is being a weenie about 
supporting them altogether I'm choosing not to. One of the first hoops OWS had me jump 
thru in the wild goose chase was to manually extend datafiles via maxsize without 
using unlimited. Eventually the only workarounds suggested by Oracle were: 1) turn 
off autoextend and manually add datafiles; 2) upgrade to 9i.



-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:10 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Steve - are you saying that there is a workaround by increasing the size of
the file manually to something larger than 4G?

Tom Mercadante
Oracle Certified Professional


-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 1:25 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


See my note: There is no such O/S file size limit.

We have datafiles  2GB which work just fine. The problem is with
autoextending datafiles that extend from 2GB to 2GB. It's not a Linux
limitation but a limitation imposed by Oracle's implementation on Linux.
Oracle 9i on Linux doesn't have this problem. And my peeve is that it took
OWS 4 days to discover this limit.


Still peeved,  :-)
Steve



-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:55 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


I think it is the limitation of Linux, not Oracle.
Use LVM and don't worry about file size limit. :-)

JP
- Original Message - 
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:40 PM


 I've just been informed that there is a 2GB datafile size limit with
Oracle 8.1.7 on Linux... PERIOD. This despite the fact that we've had files
in excess of this for some time and they work just fine. The problem occurs
when the autoextend feature reaches the 2GB threshhold. Of course, Oracle
didn't tell me this until after about 4 days of back and forth testing for
them. (There is no such O/S file size limit.) I've reviewed the Linux
release notes, the Linux install guide, the Linux admin guide and the
contents of $ORACLE_HOME/relnotes and I don't find any such limitation in
the documentation. Did I miss it? Can anyone find any such published
limitation in the docs? Is this a secret?


 Peeved at Oracle... AGAIN,
 Steve Orr
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
 -- 
 Author: Orr, Steve
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
 San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
 -
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Jan Pruner
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Orr, Steve
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Mercadante, Thomas F
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Orr, Steve
  INET: 

RE: ??? Linux/Oracle 8.1.7 2GB file size limit ???

2003-06-05 Thread DENNIS WILLIAMS
Steve - Is there a Metalink note on this? What would a person search for?

Dennis Williams
DBA, 80%OCP, 100% DBA
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:25 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


See my note: There is no such O/S file size limit.

We have datafiles  2GB which work just fine. The problem is with
autoextending datafiles that extend from 2GB to 2GB. It's not a Linux
limitation but a limitation imposed by Oracle's implementation on Linux.
Oracle 9i on Linux doesn't have this problem. And my peeve is that it took
OWS 4 days to discover this limit.


Still peeved,  :-)
Steve



-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:55 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


I think it is the limitation of Linux, not Oracle.
Use LVM and don't worry about file size limit. :-)

JP
- Original Message - 
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:40 PM


 I've just been informed that there is a 2GB datafile size limit with
Oracle 8.1.7 on Linux... PERIOD. This despite the fact that we've had files
in excess of this for some time and they work just fine. The problem occurs
when the autoextend feature reaches the 2GB threshhold. Of course, Oracle
didn't tell me this until after about 4 days of back and forth testing for
them. (There is no such O/S file size limit.) I've reviewed the Linux
release notes, the Linux install guide, the Linux admin guide and the
contents of $ORACLE_HOME/relnotes and I don't find any such limitation in
the documentation. Did I miss it? Can anyone find any such published
limitation in the docs? Is this a secret?


 Peeved at Oracle... AGAIN,
 Steve Orr
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
 -- 
 Author: Orr, Steve
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
 San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
 -
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Jan Pruner
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Orr, Steve
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: DENNIS WILLIAMS
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: ??? Linux/Oracle 8.1.7 2GB file size limit ???

2003-06-05 Thread Mercadante, Thomas F
nice.  either way, you're screwed into doing more work than you had planned.

Tom Mercadante
Oracle Certified Professional


-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:05 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Well... datafiles  2GB seem to work okay but since Oracle is being a weenie
about supporting them altogether I'm choosing not to. One of the first hoops
OWS had me jump thru in the wild goose chase was to manually extend
datafiles via maxsize without using unlimited. Eventually the only
workarounds suggested by Oracle were: 1) turn off autoextend and manually
add datafiles; 2) upgrade to 9i.



-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:10 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Steve - are you saying that there is a workaround by increasing the size of
the file manually to something larger than 4G?

Tom Mercadante
Oracle Certified Professional


-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 1:25 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


See my note: There is no such O/S file size limit.

We have datafiles  2GB which work just fine. The problem is with
autoextending datafiles that extend from 2GB to 2GB. It's not a Linux
limitation but a limitation imposed by Oracle's implementation on Linux.
Oracle 9i on Linux doesn't have this problem. And my peeve is that it took
OWS 4 days to discover this limit.


Still peeved,  :-)
Steve



-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:55 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


I think it is the limitation of Linux, not Oracle.
Use LVM and don't worry about file size limit. :-)

JP
- Original Message - 
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:40 PM


 I've just been informed that there is a 2GB datafile size limit with
Oracle 8.1.7 on Linux... PERIOD. This despite the fact that we've had files
in excess of this for some time and they work just fine. The problem occurs
when the autoextend feature reaches the 2GB threshhold. Of course, Oracle
didn't tell me this until after about 4 days of back and forth testing for
them. (There is no such O/S file size limit.) I've reviewed the Linux
release notes, the Linux install guide, the Linux admin guide and the
contents of $ORACLE_HOME/relnotes and I don't find any such limitation in
the documentation. Did I miss it? Can anyone find any such published
limitation in the docs? Is this a secret?


 Peeved at Oracle... AGAIN,
 Steve Orr
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
 -- 
 Author: Orr, Steve
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
 San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
 -
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Jan Pruner
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Orr, Steve
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Mercadante, Thomas F
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or 

RE: ??? Linux/Oracle 8.1.7 2GB file size limit ???

2003-06-05 Thread Orr, Steve
Yeah, now I call it the outta-extend feature.  :-)


-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:28 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Cc: Orr, Steve


nice.  either way, you're screwed into doing more work than you had planned.

Tom Mercadante
Oracle Certified Professional


-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:05 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Well... datafiles  2GB seem to work okay but since Oracle is being a weenie
about supporting them altogether I'm choosing not to. One of the first hoops
OWS had me jump thru in the wild goose chase was to manually extend
datafiles via maxsize without using unlimited. Eventually the only
workarounds suggested by Oracle were: 1) turn off autoextend and manually
add datafiles; 2) upgrade to 9i.



-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:10 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Steve - are you saying that there is a workaround by increasing the size of
the file manually to something larger than 4G?

Tom Mercadante
Oracle Certified Professional


-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 1:25 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


See my note: There is no such O/S file size limit.

We have datafiles  2GB which work just fine. The problem is with
autoextending datafiles that extend from 2GB to 2GB. It's not a Linux
limitation but a limitation imposed by Oracle's implementation on Linux.
Oracle 9i on Linux doesn't have this problem. And my peeve is that it took
OWS 4 days to discover this limit.


Still peeved,  :-)
Steve



-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:55 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


I think it is the limitation of Linux, not Oracle.
Use LVM and don't worry about file size limit. :-)

JP
- Original Message - 
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:40 PM


 I've just been informed that there is a 2GB datafile size limit with
Oracle 8.1.7 on Linux... PERIOD. This despite the fact that we've had files
in excess of this for some time and they work just fine. The problem occurs
when the autoextend feature reaches the 2GB threshhold. Of course, Oracle
didn't tell me this until after about 4 days of back and forth testing for
them. (There is no such O/S file size limit.) I've reviewed the Linux
release notes, the Linux install guide, the Linux admin guide and the
contents of $ORACLE_HOME/relnotes and I don't find any such limitation in
the documentation. Did I miss it? Can anyone find any such published
limitation in the docs? Is this a secret?


 Peeved at Oracle... AGAIN,
 Steve Orr
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
 -- 
 Author: Orr, Steve
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
 San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
 -
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Jan Pruner
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Orr, Steve
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Mercadante, Thomas F
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this 

RE: ??? Linux/Oracle 8.1.7 2GB file size limit ???

2003-06-05 Thread DENNIS WILLIAMS
Nevermind, a search on 2gb yielded Note 112011.1, which seems to explain
it all. Oh well, one more item for my to do list.

Dennis Williams
DBA, 80%OCP, 100% DBA
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 2:30 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Steve - Is there a Metalink note on this? What would a person search for?

Dennis Williams
DBA, 80%OCP, 100% DBA
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:25 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


See my note: There is no such O/S file size limit.

We have datafiles  2GB which work just fine. The problem is with
autoextending datafiles that extend from 2GB to 2GB. It's not a Linux
limitation but a limitation imposed by Oracle's implementation on Linux.
Oracle 9i on Linux doesn't have this problem. And my peeve is that it took
OWS 4 days to discover this limit.


Still peeved,  :-)
Steve



-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:55 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


I think it is the limitation of Linux, not Oracle.
Use LVM and don't worry about file size limit. :-)

JP
- Original Message - 
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:40 PM


 I've just been informed that there is a 2GB datafile size limit with
Oracle 8.1.7 on Linux... PERIOD. This despite the fact that we've had files
in excess of this for some time and they work just fine. The problem occurs
when the autoextend feature reaches the 2GB threshhold. Of course, Oracle
didn't tell me this until after about 4 days of back and forth testing for
them. (There is no such O/S file size limit.) I've reviewed the Linux
release notes, the Linux install guide, the Linux admin guide and the
contents of $ORACLE_HOME/relnotes and I don't find any such limitation in
the documentation. Did I miss it? Can anyone find any such published
limitation in the docs? Is this a secret?


 Peeved at Oracle... AGAIN,
 Steve Orr
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
 -- 
 Author: Orr, Steve
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
 San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
 -
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Jan Pruner
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Orr, Steve
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: DENNIS WILLIAMS
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: DENNIS WILLIAMS
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-

RE: ??? Linux/Oracle 8.1.7 2GB file size limit ???

2003-06-05 Thread April Wells
Title: RE: ??? Linux/Oracle 8.1.7 2GB file size limit ???





Upgrading was number 2?


NO way!?! I am (genuinely) surprised that it wasn't number 1 suggestion... 


April Wells
Oracle DBA/Oracle Apps DBA
Corporate Systems
Amarillo Texas


You will recognize your own path when you come upon it, because you will suddenly have all the energy and imagination you will ever need.

~ Jerry Gillies ~




-Original Message-
From: Orr, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 2:05 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: ??? Linux/Oracle 8.1.7 2GB file size limit ???



Well... datafiles  2GB seem to work okay but since Oracle is being a weenie about supporting them altogether I'm choosing not to. One of the first hoops OWS had me jump thru in the wild goose chase was to manually extend datafiles via maxsize without using unlimited. Eventually the only workarounds suggested by Oracle were: 1) turn off autoextend and manually add datafiles; 2) upgrade to 9i.



-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:10 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L



Steve - are you saying that there is a workaround by increasing the size of
the file manually to something larger than 4G?


Tom Mercadante
Oracle Certified Professional



-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 1:25 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L



See my note: There is no such O/S file size limit.


We have datafiles  2GB which work just fine. The problem is with
autoextending datafiles that extend from 2GB to 2GB. It's not a Linux
limitation but a limitation imposed by Oracle's implementation on Linux.
Oracle 9i on Linux doesn't have this problem. And my peeve is that it took
OWS 4 days to discover this limit.



Still peeved, :-)
Steve




-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:55 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L



I think it is the limitation of Linux, not Oracle.
Use LVM and don't worry about file size limit. :-)


JP
- Original Message - 
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:40 PM



 I've just been informed that there is a 2GB datafile size limit with
Oracle 8.1.7 on Linux... PERIOD. This despite the fact that we've had files
in excess of this for some time and they work just fine. The problem occurs
when the autoextend feature reaches the 2GB threshhold. Of course, Oracle
didn't tell me this until after about 4 days of back and forth testing for
them. (There is no such O/S file size limit.) I've reviewed the Linux
release notes, the Linux install guide, the Linux admin guide and the
contents of $ORACLE_HOME/relnotes and I don't find any such limitation in
the documentation. Did I miss it? Can anyone find any such published
limitation in the docs? Is this a secret?


 Peeved at Oracle... AGAIN,
 Steve Orr
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
 -- 
 Author: Orr, Steve
 INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
 San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services
 -
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Jan Pruner
 INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Orr, Steve
 INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Mercadante, Thomas F
 INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051

RE: ??? Linux/Oracle 8.1.7 2GB file size limit ???

2003-06-05 Thread Orr, Steve
As per Branimer's previous post, try searching under dirty little secrets. :-)


-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 1:30 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Steve - Is there a Metalink note on this? What would a person search for?

Dennis Williams
DBA, 80%OCP, 100% DBA
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:25 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


See my note: There is no such O/S file size limit.

We have datafiles  2GB which work just fine. The problem is with
autoextending datafiles that extend from 2GB to 2GB. It's not a Linux
limitation but a limitation imposed by Oracle's implementation on Linux.
Oracle 9i on Linux doesn't have this problem. And my peeve is that it took
OWS 4 days to discover this limit.


Still peeved,  :-)
Steve



-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:55 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


I think it is the limitation of Linux, not Oracle.
Use LVM and don't worry about file size limit. :-)

JP
- Original Message - 
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:40 PM


 I've just been informed that there is a 2GB datafile size limit with
Oracle 8.1.7 on Linux... PERIOD. This despite the fact that we've had files
in excess of this for some time and they work just fine. The problem occurs
when the autoextend feature reaches the 2GB threshhold. Of course, Oracle
didn't tell me this until after about 4 days of back and forth testing for
them. (There is no such O/S file size limit.) I've reviewed the Linux
release notes, the Linux install guide, the Linux admin guide and the
contents of $ORACLE_HOME/relnotes and I don't find any such limitation in
the documentation. Did I miss it? Can anyone find any such published
limitation in the docs? Is this a secret?


 Peeved at Oracle... AGAIN,
 Steve Orr
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
 -- 
 Author: Orr, Steve
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
 San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
 -
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Jan Pruner
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Orr, Steve
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: DENNIS WILLIAMS
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Orr, Steve
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 

RE: ??? Linux/Oracle 8.1.7 2GB file size limit ???

2003-06-05 Thread Orr, Steve
It doesn't seem to be a problem on other platforms... Just when I stopped feeling like 
a neglected step child for running on Linux. Don't worry... Be happy... There's a 
workaround... Upgrade and buy more software...

D'ai jobu desu... er, eh, Ca ne fais rien.


-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:46 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


This almost sounds like the problem that existed for Oracle 7.3 and the 2G
threshold a couple of years ago...

J'ai une impression d'avoir déjà vu ceci.

: )

Patrice.

-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:10 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Steve - are you saying that there is a workaround by increasing the size of
the file manually to something larger than 4G?

Tom Mercadante
Oracle Certified Professional


-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 1:25 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


See my note: There is no such O/S file size limit.

We have datafiles  2GB which work just fine. The problem is with
autoextending datafiles that extend from 2GB to 2GB. It's not a Linux
limitation but a limitation imposed by Oracle's implementation on Linux.
Oracle 9i on Linux doesn't have this problem. And my peeve is that it took
OWS 4 days to discover this limit.


Still peeved,  :-)
Steve



-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:55 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


I think it is the limitation of Linux, not Oracle.
Use LVM and don't worry about file size limit. :-)

JP
- Original Message - 
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:40 PM


 I've just been informed that there is a 2GB datafile size limit with
Oracle 8.1.7 on Linux... PERIOD. This despite the fact that we've had files
in excess of this for some time and they work just fine. The problem occurs
when the autoextend feature reaches the 2GB threshhold. Of course, Oracle
didn't tell me this until after about 4 days of back and forth testing for
them. (There is no such O/S file size limit.) I've reviewed the Linux
release notes, the Linux install guide, the Linux admin guide and the
contents of $ORACLE_HOME/relnotes and I don't find any such limitation in
the documentation. Did I miss it? Can anyone find any such published
limitation in the docs? Is this a secret?


 Peeved at Oracle... AGAIN,
 Steve Orr
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
 -- 
 Author: Orr, Steve
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
 San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
 -
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Jan Pruner
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Orr, Steve
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Mercadante, Thomas F
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command 

RE: ??? Linux/Oracle 8.1.7 2GB file size limit ???

2003-06-05 Thread Matthew Zito
Title: Message




Oracle 
8i on linux, while functional, definitely had/has a whole boatload of 
problems. 9i is much better all around, and I'm not surprised that Oracle 
support is pushing it heavily. We're getting a lot of customers that are 
trying to get off 8i because of problems like this one, plus that 8.1.7 is the 
terminal release for 8i and they're tired of getting flack from Oracle 
support. 

Thanks,
Matt
--Matthew ZitoGridApp SystemsEmail: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Cell: 646-220-3551Phone: 212-358-8211 x 359 

  
  -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of April WellsSent: 
  Wednesday, June 04, 2003 2:30 PMTo: Multiple recipients of list 
  ORACLE-LSubject: RE: ??? Linux/Oracle 8.1.7 2GB file size limit 
  ???
  Upgrading was number 2? 
  NO way!?! I am (genuinely) surprised that it wasn't 
  number 1 suggestion... 
  April Wells Oracle DBA/Oracle Apps 
  DBA Corporate Systems Amarillo 
  Texas 
  You will recognize your own path when you come upon it, 
  because you will suddenly have all the energy and imagination you will ever 
  need.
  ~ Jerry Gillies ~ 
  -Original Message- From: Orr, 
  Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 2:05 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: RE: ??? Linux/Oracle 8.1.7 2GB file size limit ??? 
  
  Well... datafiles  2GB seem to work okay but since Oracle 
  is being a weenie about supporting them altogether I'm choosing not to. One of 
  the first hoops OWS had me jump thru in the wild goose chase was to manually 
  extend datafiles via maxsize without using "unlimited." Eventually the only 
  workarounds suggested by Oracle were: 1) turn off autoextend and manually add 
  datafiles; 2) upgrade to 9i.
  -Original Message- Sent: 
  Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:10 PM To: Multiple 
  recipients of list ORACLE-L 
  Steve - are you saying that there is a workaround by 
  increasing the size of the file manually to something 
  larger than 4G? 
  Tom Mercadante Oracle Certified 
  Professional 
  -Original Message- Sent: 
  Wednesday, June 04, 2003 1:25 PM To: Multiple 
  recipients of list ORACLE-L 
  See my note: "There is no such O/S file size limit." 
  
  We have datafiles  2GB which work just fine. The problem 
  is with autoextending datafiles that extend from 
  2GB to 2GB. It's not a Linux limitation but a 
  limitation imposed by Oracle's implementation on Linux. Oracle 9i on Linux doesn't have this problem. And my peeve is that it 
  took OWS 4 days to "discover" this "limit." 
  
  Still peeved, :-) Steve 
  
  -Original Message- Sent: 
  Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:55 AM To: Multiple 
  recipients of list ORACLE-L 
  I think it is the limitation of Linux, not Oracle. 
  Use LVM and don't worry about file size limit. :-) 

  JP - Original Message - 
  To: "Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L" 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 
  2003 5:40 PM 
   I've just been informed that there is a 2GB datafile size 
  limit with Oracle 8.1.7 on Linux... PERIOD. This 
  despite the fact that we've had files in excess of 
  this for some time and they work just fine. The problem occurs 
  when the autoextend "feature" reaches the 2GB threshhold. Of 
  course, Oracle didn't tell me this until after about 4 
  days of back and forth testing for them. (There is no 
  such O/S file size limit.) I've reviewed the Linux release notes, the Linux install guide, the Linux admin guide and 
  the contents of $ORACLE_HOME/relnotes and I don't find 
  any such limitation in the documentation. Did I miss 
  it? Can anyone find any such published limitation in 
  the docs? Is this a secret?Peeved at Oracle... AGAIN, 
   Steve Orr  -- 
   Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net 
   --  Author: Orr, 
  Steve  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Fat City Network 
  Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com  San 
  Diego, California -- Mailing list 
  and web hosting services  
  - 
   To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an 
  E-Mail message  to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note 
  EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in  the message 
  BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L  
  (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You 
  may  also send the HELP command for other 
  information (like subscribing).  
  -- Please see the official ORACLE-L 
  FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- 
  Author: Jan Pruner  
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com 
  San Diego, 
  California -- Mailing list and web 
  hosting services - 
  To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail 
  message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling 
  of 'ListGuru') and in th

RE: ??? Linux/Oracle 8.1.7 2GB file size limit ???

2003-06-05 Thread DENNIS WILLIAMS
Ahem . . . according to Note 112011.1, these problems can affect all
platforms except OS/390 which does NOT support datafile resizing
(fiendishly clever those mainframe types). 
It looks like 8.1.7.4 and above is not affected. I would highly recommend
that all Oracle DBAs take a look at this note.

Dennis Williams
DBA, 80%OCP, 100% DBA
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:00 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


It doesn't seem to be a problem on other platforms... Just when I stopped
feeling like a neglected step child for running on Linux. Don't worry... Be
happy... There's a workaround... Upgrade and buy more software...

D'ai jobu desu... er, eh, Ca ne fais rien.


-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:46 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


This almost sounds like the problem that existed for Oracle 7.3 and the 2G
threshold a couple of years ago...

J'ai une impression d'avoir déjà vu ceci.

: )

Patrice.

-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:10 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Steve - are you saying that there is a workaround by increasing the size of
the file manually to something larger than 4G?

Tom Mercadante
Oracle Certified Professional


-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 1:25 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


See my note: There is no such O/S file size limit.

We have datafiles  2GB which work just fine. The problem is with
autoextending datafiles that extend from 2GB to 2GB. It's not a Linux
limitation but a limitation imposed by Oracle's implementation on Linux.
Oracle 9i on Linux doesn't have this problem. And my peeve is that it took
OWS 4 days to discover this limit.


Still peeved,  :-)
Steve



-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:55 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


I think it is the limitation of Linux, not Oracle.
Use LVM and don't worry about file size limit. :-)

JP
- Original Message - 
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:40 PM


 I've just been informed that there is a 2GB datafile size limit with
Oracle 8.1.7 on Linux... PERIOD. This despite the fact that we've had files
in excess of this for some time and they work just fine. The problem occurs
when the autoextend feature reaches the 2GB threshhold. Of course, Oracle
didn't tell me this until after about 4 days of back and forth testing for
them. (There is no such O/S file size limit.) I've reviewed the Linux
release notes, the Linux install guide, the Linux admin guide and the
contents of $ORACLE_HOME/relnotes and I don't find any such limitation in
the documentation. Did I miss it? Can anyone find any such published
limitation in the docs? Is this a secret?


 Peeved at Oracle... AGAIN,
 Steve Orr
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
 -- 
 Author: Orr, Steve
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
 San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
 -
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Jan Pruner
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Orr, Steve
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Mercadante, Thomas F
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City 

RE: ??? Linux/Oracle 8.1.7 2GB file size limit ???

2003-06-05 Thread Orr, Steve
We are on 8.1.7.4 and it aflicted us anyway. Maybe I'll just wait a couple of years 
and let other customers QA this Oracle feature until they get it right.


Steve


-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 2:35 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Ahem . . . according to Note 112011.1, these problems can affect all
platforms except OS/390 which does NOT support datafile resizing
(fiendishly clever those mainframe types). 
It looks like 8.1.7.4 and above is not affected. I would highly recommend
that all Oracle DBAs take a look at this note.

Dennis Williams
DBA, 80%OCP, 100% DBA
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:00 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


It doesn't seem to be a problem on other platforms... Just when I stopped
feeling like a neglected step child for running on Linux. Don't worry... Be
happy... There's a workaround... Upgrade and buy more software...

D'ai jobu desu... er, eh, Ca ne fais rien.


-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:46 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


This almost sounds like the problem that existed for Oracle 7.3 and the 2G
threshold a couple of years ago...

J'ai une impression d'avoir déjà vu ceci.

: )

Patrice.

-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:10 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Steve - are you saying that there is a workaround by increasing the size of
the file manually to something larger than 4G?

Tom Mercadante
Oracle Certified Professional


-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 1:25 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


See my note: There is no such O/S file size limit.

We have datafiles  2GB which work just fine. The problem is with
autoextending datafiles that extend from 2GB to 2GB. It's not a Linux
limitation but a limitation imposed by Oracle's implementation on Linux.
Oracle 9i on Linux doesn't have this problem. And my peeve is that it took
OWS 4 days to discover this limit.


Still peeved,  :-)
Steve



-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:55 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


I think it is the limitation of Linux, not Oracle.
Use LVM and don't worry about file size limit. :-)

JP
- Original Message - 
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:40 PM


 I've just been informed that there is a 2GB datafile size limit with
Oracle 8.1.7 on Linux... PERIOD. This despite the fact that we've had files
in excess of this for some time and they work just fine. The problem occurs
when the autoextend feature reaches the 2GB threshhold. Of course, Oracle
didn't tell me this until after about 4 days of back and forth testing for
them. (There is no such O/S file size limit.) I've reviewed the Linux
release notes, the Linux install guide, the Linux admin guide and the
contents of $ORACLE_HOME/relnotes and I don't find any such limitation in
the documentation. Did I miss it? Can anyone find any such published
limitation in the docs? Is this a secret?


 Peeved at Oracle... AGAIN,
 Steve Orr
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
 -- 
 Author: Orr, Steve
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
 San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
 -
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Jan Pruner
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Orr, Steve
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB 

RE: ??? Linux/Oracle 8.1.7 2GB file size limit ???

2003-06-05 Thread Goulet, Dick
Dennis,

Thanks a lot, the diamond of the day from the list.

Dick Goulet
Senior Oracle DBA
Oracle Certified 8i DBA 

-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:35 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Ahem . . . according to Note 112011.1, these problems can affect all
platforms except OS/390 which does NOT support datafile resizing
(fiendishly clever those mainframe types). 
It looks like 8.1.7.4 and above is not affected. I would highly recommend
that all Oracle DBAs take a look at this note.

Dennis Williams
DBA, 80%OCP, 100% DBA
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:00 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


It doesn't seem to be a problem on other platforms... Just when I stopped
feeling like a neglected step child for running on Linux. Don't worry... Be
happy... There's a workaround... Upgrade and buy more software...

D'ai jobu desu... er, eh, Ca ne fais rien.


-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:46 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


This almost sounds like the problem that existed for Oracle 7.3 and the 2G
threshold a couple of years ago...

J'ai une impression d'avoir déjà vu ceci.

: )

Patrice.

-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:10 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Steve - are you saying that there is a workaround by increasing the size of
the file manually to something larger than 4G?

Tom Mercadante
Oracle Certified Professional


-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 1:25 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


See my note: There is no such O/S file size limit.

We have datafiles  2GB which work just fine. The problem is with
autoextending datafiles that extend from 2GB to 2GB. It's not a Linux
limitation but a limitation imposed by Oracle's implementation on Linux.
Oracle 9i on Linux doesn't have this problem. And my peeve is that it took
OWS 4 days to discover this limit.


Still peeved,  :-)
Steve



-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:55 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


I think it is the limitation of Linux, not Oracle.
Use LVM and don't worry about file size limit. :-)

JP
- Original Message - 
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:40 PM


 I've just been informed that there is a 2GB datafile size limit with
Oracle 8.1.7 on Linux... PERIOD. This despite the fact that we've had files
in excess of this for some time and they work just fine. The problem occurs
when the autoextend feature reaches the 2GB threshhold. Of course, Oracle
didn't tell me this until after about 4 days of back and forth testing for
them. (There is no such O/S file size limit.) I've reviewed the Linux
release notes, the Linux install guide, the Linux admin guide and the
contents of $ORACLE_HOME/relnotes and I don't find any such limitation in
the documentation. Did I miss it? Can anyone find any such published
limitation in the docs? Is this a secret?


 Peeved at Oracle... AGAIN,
 Steve Orr
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
 -- 
 Author: Orr, Steve
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
 San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
 -
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Jan Pruner
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Orr, Steve
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want 

RE: ??? Linux/Oracle 8.1.7 2GB file size limit ???

2003-06-05 Thread DENNIS WILLIAMS
Steve
   Personally I am VERY glad you mentioned this today. Since I run 64-bit
Unix, I didn't think this applied to me, but after reading the note, I ran
their formula and found a file on one of my databases that was very close to
the limit. Plenty happy to dodge that bullet.

Dennis Williams
DBA, 80%OCP, 100% DBA
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:15 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


We are on 8.1.7.4 and it aflicted us anyway. Maybe I'll just wait a couple
of years and let other customers QA this Oracle feature until they get it
right.


Steve


-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 2:35 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Ahem . . . according to Note 112011.1, these problems can affect all
platforms except OS/390 which does NOT support datafile resizing
(fiendishly clever those mainframe types). 
It looks like 8.1.7.4 and above is not affected. I would highly recommend
that all Oracle DBAs take a look at this note.

Dennis Williams
DBA, 80%OCP, 100% DBA
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:00 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


It doesn't seem to be a problem on other platforms... Just when I stopped
feeling like a neglected step child for running on Linux. Don't worry... Be
happy... There's a workaround... Upgrade and buy more software...

D'ai jobu desu... er, eh, Ca ne fais rien.


-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:46 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


This almost sounds like the problem that existed for Oracle 7.3 and the 2G
threshold a couple of years ago...

J'ai une impression d'avoir déjà vu ceci.

: )

Patrice.

-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:10 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Steve - are you saying that there is a workaround by increasing the size of
the file manually to something larger than 4G?

Tom Mercadante
Oracle Certified Professional


-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 1:25 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


See my note: There is no such O/S file size limit.

We have datafiles  2GB which work just fine. The problem is with
autoextending datafiles that extend from 2GB to 2GB. It's not a Linux
limitation but a limitation imposed by Oracle's implementation on Linux.
Oracle 9i on Linux doesn't have this problem. And my peeve is that it took
OWS 4 days to discover this limit.


Still peeved,  :-)
Steve



-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:55 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


I think it is the limitation of Linux, not Oracle.
Use LVM and don't worry about file size limit. :-)

JP
- Original Message - 
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:40 PM


 I've just been informed that there is a 2GB datafile size limit with
Oracle 8.1.7 on Linux... PERIOD. This despite the fact that we've had files
in excess of this for some time and they work just fine. The problem occurs
when the autoextend feature reaches the 2GB threshhold. Of course, Oracle
didn't tell me this until after about 4 days of back and forth testing for
them. (There is no such O/S file size limit.) I've reviewed the Linux
release notes, the Linux install guide, the Linux admin guide and the
contents of $ORACLE_HOME/relnotes and I don't find any such limitation in
the documentation. Did I miss it? Can anyone find any such published
limitation in the docs? Is this a secret?


 Peeved at Oracle... AGAIN,
 Steve Orr
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
 -- 
 Author: Orr, Steve
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
 San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
 -
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Jan Pruner
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: 

RE: ??? Linux/Oracle 8.1.7 2GB file size limit ???

2003-06-05 Thread Orr, Steve
And thanks for the note recommendation Dennis...

There's too many of these bullets flying around. Need a short list called: Things you 
should know that Oracle doesn't tell you straight out. 

Of course there's the bug list but who has time for that and can remember it all? 
Sigh...


Steve


-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:40 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Steve
   Personally I am VERY glad you mentioned this today. Since I run 64-bit
Unix, I didn't think this applied to me, but after reading the note, I ran
their formula and found a file on one of my databases that was very close to
the limit. Plenty happy to dodge that bullet.

Dennis Williams
DBA, 80%OCP, 100% DBA
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:15 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


We are on 8.1.7.4 and it aflicted us anyway. Maybe I'll just wait a couple
of years and let other customers QA this Oracle feature until they get it
right.


Steve


-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 2:35 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Ahem . . . according to Note 112011.1, these problems can affect all
platforms except OS/390 which does NOT support datafile resizing
(fiendishly clever those mainframe types). 
It looks like 8.1.7.4 and above is not affected. I would highly recommend
that all Oracle DBAs take a look at this note.

Dennis Williams
DBA, 80%OCP, 100% DBA
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:00 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


It doesn't seem to be a problem on other platforms... Just when I stopped
feeling like a neglected step child for running on Linux. Don't worry... Be
happy... There's a workaround... Upgrade and buy more software...

D'ai jobu desu... er, eh, Ca ne fais rien.


-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:46 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


This almost sounds like the problem that existed for Oracle 7.3 and the 2G
threshold a couple of years ago...

J'ai une impression d'avoir déjà vu ceci.

: )

Patrice.

-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:10 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Steve - are you saying that there is a workaround by increasing the size of
the file manually to something larger than 4G?

Tom Mercadante
Oracle Certified Professional


-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 1:25 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


See my note: There is no such O/S file size limit.

We have datafiles  2GB which work just fine. The problem is with
autoextending datafiles that extend from 2GB to 2GB. It's not a Linux
limitation but a limitation imposed by Oracle's implementation on Linux.
Oracle 9i on Linux doesn't have this problem. And my peeve is that it took
OWS 4 days to discover this limit.


Still peeved,  :-)
Steve



-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:55 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


I think it is the limitation of Linux, not Oracle.
Use LVM and don't worry about file size limit. :-)

JP
- Original Message - 
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:40 PM


 I've just been informed that there is a 2GB datafile size limit with
Oracle 8.1.7 on Linux... PERIOD. This despite the fact that we've had files
in excess of this for some time and they work just fine. The problem occurs
when the autoextend feature reaches the 2GB threshhold. Of course, Oracle
didn't tell me this until after about 4 days of back and forth testing for
them. (There is no such O/S file size limit.) I've reviewed the Linux
release notes, the Linux install guide, the Linux admin guide and the
contents of $ORACLE_HOME/relnotes and I don't find any such limitation in
the documentation. Did I miss it? Can anyone find any such published
limitation in the docs? Is this a secret?


 Peeved at Oracle... AGAIN,
 Steve Orr
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
 -- 
 Author: Orr, Steve
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
 San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
 -
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Jan Pruner
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services

RE: ??? Linux/Oracle 8.1.7 2GB file size limit ???

2003-06-05 Thread Rachel Carmichael
geez, back to the very very first presentation Marlene Theriault and I
did together, about version 6, called All the Things THEY Didn't Tell
You

you mean I hafta update it AGAIN?

:)

--- Orr, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 And thanks for the note recommendation Dennis...
 
 There's too many of these bullets flying around. Need a short list
 called: Things you should know that Oracle doesn't tell you straight
 out. 
 
 Of course there's the bug list but who has time for that and can
 remember it all? Sigh...
 
 
 Steve
 
 
 -Original Message-
 Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:40 PM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 
 
 Steve
Personally I am VERY glad you mentioned this today. Since I run
 64-bit
 Unix, I didn't think this applied to me, but after reading the note,
 I ran
 their formula and found a file on one of my databases that was very
 close to
 the limit. Plenty happy to dodge that bullet.
 
 Dennis Williams
 DBA, 80%OCP, 100% DBA
 Lifetouch, Inc.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:15 PM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 
 
 We are on 8.1.7.4 and it aflicted us anyway. Maybe I'll just wait a
 couple
 of years and let other customers QA this Oracle feature until they
 get it
 right.
 
 
 Steve
 
 
 -Original Message-
 Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 2:35 PM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 
 
 Ahem . . . according to Note 112011.1, these problems can affect all
 platforms except OS/390 which does NOT support datafile resizing
 (fiendishly clever those mainframe types). 
 It looks like 8.1.7.4 and above is not affected. I would highly
 recommend
 that all Oracle DBAs take a look at this note.
 
 Dennis Williams
 DBA, 80%OCP, 100% DBA
 Lifetouch, Inc.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:00 PM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 
 
 It doesn't seem to be a problem on other platforms... Just when I
 stopped
 feeling like a neglected step child for running on Linux. Don't
 worry... Be
 happy... There's a workaround... Upgrade and buy more software...
 
 D'ai jobu desu... er, eh, Ca ne fais rien.
 
 
 -Original Message-
 Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:46 PM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 
 
 This almost sounds like the problem that existed for Oracle 7.3 and
 the 2G
 threshold a couple of years ago...
 
 J'ai une impression d'avoir déjà vu ceci.
 
 : )
 
 Patrice.
 
 -Original Message-
 Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:10 PM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 
 
 Steve - are you saying that there is a workaround by increasing the
 size of
 the file manually to something larger than 4G?
 
 Tom Mercadante
 Oracle Certified Professional
 
 
 -Original Message-
 Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 1:25 PM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 
 
 See my note: There is no such O/S file size limit.
 
 We have datafiles  2GB which work just fine. The problem is with
 autoextending datafiles that extend from 2GB to 2GB. It's not a
 Linux
 limitation but a limitation imposed by Oracle's implementation on
 Linux.
 Oracle 9i on Linux doesn't have this problem. And my peeve is that it
 took
 OWS 4 days to discover this limit.
 
 
 Still peeved,  :-)
 Steve
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:55 AM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 
 
 I think it is the limitation of Linux, not Oracle.
 Use LVM and don't worry about file size limit. :-)
 
 JP
 - Original Message - 
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:40 PM
 
 
  I've just been informed that there is a 2GB datafile size limit
 with
 Oracle 8.1.7 on Linux... PERIOD. This despite the fact that we've had
 files
 in excess of this for some time and they work just fine. The problem
 occurs
 when the autoextend feature reaches the 2GB threshhold. Of course,
 Oracle
 didn't tell me this until after about 4 days of back and forth
 testing for
 them. (There is no such O/S file size limit.) I've reviewed the Linux
 release notes, the Linux install guide, the Linux admin guide and the
 contents of $ORACLE_HOME/relnotes and I don't find any such
 limitation in
 the documentation. Did I miss it? Can anyone find any such published
 limitation in the docs? Is this a secret?
 
 
  Peeved at Oracle... AGAIN,
  Steve Orr
  -- 
  Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
  -- 
  Author: Orr, Steve
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
  San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting
 services
 
 -
  To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
  to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
  the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
  (or the name of mailing 

RE: ??? Linux/Oracle 8.1.7 2GB file size limit ???

2003-06-05 Thread Babette Turner-Underwood
Woohoo!! Us OS/390ers have it made !
 actually in 9i they started allowing files to autoextend but I am not
sure how they do it... On OS/390 you still cannot shrink a datafile.

- Babette

-Original Message-
WILLIAMS
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:35 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Ahem . . . according to Note 112011.1, these problems can affect all
platforms except OS/390 which does NOT support datafile resizing
(fiendishly clever those mainframe types).
It looks like 8.1.7.4 and above is not affected. I would highly recommend
that all Oracle DBAs take a look at this note.

Dennis Williams
DBA, 80%OCP, 100% DBA
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:00 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


It doesn't seem to be a problem on other platforms... Just when I stopped
feeling like a neglected step child for running on Linux. Don't worry... Be
happy... There's a workaround... Upgrade and buy more software...

D'ai jobu desu... er, eh, Ca ne fais rien.


-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:46 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


This almost sounds like the problem that existed for Oracle 7.3 and the 2G
threshold a couple of years ago...

J'ai une impression d'avoir déjà vu ceci.

: )

Patrice.

-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:10 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Steve - are you saying that there is a workaround by increasing the size of
the file manually to something larger than 4G?

Tom Mercadante
Oracle Certified Professional


-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 1:25 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


See my note: There is no such O/S file size limit.

We have datafiles  2GB which work just fine. The problem is with
autoextending datafiles that extend from 2GB to 2GB. It's not a Linux
limitation but a limitation imposed by Oracle's implementation on Linux.
Oracle 9i on Linux doesn't have this problem. And my peeve is that it took
OWS 4 days to discover this limit.


Still peeved,  :-)
Steve



-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:55 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


I think it is the limitation of Linux, not Oracle.
Use LVM and don't worry about file size limit. :-)

JP
- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:40 PM


 I've just been informed that there is a 2GB datafile size limit with
Oracle 8.1.7 on Linux... PERIOD. This despite the fact that we've had files
in excess of this for some time and they work just fine. The problem occurs
when the autoextend feature reaches the 2GB threshhold. Of course, Oracle
didn't tell me this until after about 4 days of back and forth testing for
them. (There is no such O/S file size limit.) I've reviewed the Linux
release notes, the Linux install guide, the Linux admin guide and the
contents of $ORACLE_HOME/relnotes and I don't find any such limitation in
the documentation. Did I miss it? Can anyone find any such published
limitation in the docs? Is this a secret?


 Peeved at Oracle... AGAIN,
 Steve Orr
 --
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
 --
 Author: Orr, Steve
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
 San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
 -
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: Jan Pruner
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: Orr, Steve
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a 

Re: linux intel support matrix

2003-04-04 Thread Ray Stell
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 06:33:53PM -0800, Ray Stell wrote:
 
 I went to look at the matrix today and found it dramatically
 changed.  I found only 9.2.0 and Redhat AS.  All the other 
 free linux versions are gone as well as all 8i versions.
 Do you find the same, maybe the webmeister is messing we me?
 
 Stupid, fat Hobbitses!


My bad.  I chose Linux Intel Itanium thinking they had changed it to
mean Intel + Itanium.  They changed it from Linux Intel to Linux
IA32.  The free stuff is still there. 

Nice Hobbitses!
===
Ray Stell   [EMAIL PROTECTED] (540) 231-4109 KE4TJC28^D
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Ray Stell
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: linux intel support matrix

2003-04-04 Thread Odland, Brad
What you see is correct. 9.2.0 is only supported on PAY versions of linux.
8.1.7 is still supported on various free versions. (funny how open only
includes 

We just went through hoops trying to find a combination of free Linux and
Oracle that
we could run OEM OMS and names on...

We settled on 7.1, 8.1.7.4.0 and OEM 2.2.0...after some fun installing,
patching and relinking all seems well...


Brad O.
-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 8:34 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L



I went to look at the matrix today and found it dramatically
changed.  I found only 9.2.0 and Redhat AS.  All the other 
free linux versions are gone as well as all 8i versions.
Do you find the same, maybe the webmeister is messing we me?

Stupid, fat Hobbitses!
===
Ray Stell   [EMAIL PROTECTED] (540) 231-4109 KE4TJC28^D
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Ray Stell
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Odland, Brad
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: linux intel support matrix

2003-04-04 Thread Gogala, Mladen
I seriously advise against the Intel Itanic machines. If you
need 64 bits you can either wait for the Clawhammer or switch to
something else that already supports 64 bits. One little HP superdome
would be a nice decoration in my living room. Intel Itanic has hit an
iceberg.

-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 8:29 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 06:33:53PM -0800, Ray Stell wrote:
 
 I went to look at the matrix today and found it dramatically
 changed.  I found only 9.2.0 and Redhat AS.  All the other 
 free linux versions are gone as well as all 8i versions.
 Do you find the same, maybe the webmeister is messing we me?
 
 Stupid, fat Hobbitses!


My bad.  I chose Linux Intel Itanium thinking they had changed it to
mean Intel + Itanium.  They changed it from Linux Intel to Linux
IA32.  The free stuff is still there. 

Nice Hobbitses!
===
Ray Stell   [EMAIL PROTECTED] (540) 231-4109 KE4TJC28^D
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Ray Stell
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Gogala, Mladen
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: linux intel support matrix

2003-04-04 Thread bill thater
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I seriously advise against the Intel Itanic machines. If you
need 64 bits you can either wait for the Clawhammer or switch to
something else that already supports 64 bits. One little HP superdome
would be a nice decoration in my living room. Intel Itanic has hit an
iceberg.
now don't hold back, let us know how you really feel.;-)  me i'd settle 
for a nice alpha.  i could even deal with VMS.;-)

--
--
Bill Shrek Thater  ORACLE DBA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om mani padme hum.

--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: bill thater
 INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


Re: linux intel support matrix

2003-04-04 Thread Ron Rogers
Bill,
 Welcome back!!! I haven't read you in a long time. Hope all is well.
Ron

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/04/03 12:29PM 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I seriously advise against the Intel Itanic machines. If you
 need 64 bits you can either wait for the Clawhammer or switch to
 something else that already supports 64 bits. One little HP
superdome
 would be a nice decoration in my living room. Intel Itanic has hit
an
 iceberg.

now don't hold back, let us know how you really feel.;-)  me i'd settle

for a nice alpha.  i could even deal with VMS.;-)


-- 
--
Bill Shrek Thater  ORACLE DBA
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Om mani padme hum.


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net 
-- 
Author: bill thater
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com 
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Ron Rogers
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: linux intel support matrix

2003-04-04 Thread bill thater
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill,
 Welcome back!!! I haven't read you in a long time. Hope all is well.
Ron
just got a 3 month contract after being out of work since the end of 
june.  guess that's the end of my afternoon naps, and my afternoon beer, 
for a while.;-)

--
--
Bill Shrek Thater  ORACLE DBA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om mani padme hum.

--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: bill thater
 INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


RE: linux intel support matrix

2003-04-04 Thread Weaver, Walt
They make you work in the afternoon

--Walt Weaver
  Bozeman, Montana

 -Original Message-
 From: bill thater [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 2:29 PM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 Subject: Re: linux intel support matrix
 
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Bill,
   Welcome back!!! I haven't read you in a long time. Hope 
 all is well.
  Ron
 
 just got a 3 month contract after being out of work since the end of 
 june.  guess that's the end of my afternoon naps, and my 
 afternoon beer, 
 for a while.;-)
 
 -- 
 --
 Bill Shrek Thater  ORACLE DBA
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Weaver, Walt
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: linux intel support matrix

2003-04-04 Thread Chris Berry
From: Weaver, Walt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
They make you work in the afternoon
--Walt Weaver
  Bozeman, Montana
You mean sometimes you aren't at work?

Chris Berry
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems Administrator
JM Associates
Without change, something sleeps inside us, and seldom awakens.  The 
sleeper must awaken. -- Duke Leto Atreides

_
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*.  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus

--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: Chris Berry
 INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


RE: Linux and Oracle Cluster File System

2003-01-07 Thread Richard Ji



Jos,

Yes, 
you are right that if you use OCFS then you can just have one mount point and 
create all
data 
files under it, because OCFS is a file system. It makes it a lot easier to 
manage space
and 
you can use commands like: cp, mv, rm etc which you can't do to a raw 
partition.
Backup 
on OCFS is also easier than using raw.

Richard Ji

  -Original Message-From: Jos 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 
  8:49 AMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: 
  OT: Linux and Oracle Cluster File SystemList,I am a 
  newbie on Linux and Clustering technology, I need to setup a RAC system and 
  have been reading somedocumentation on how to do it. I am a bit confuse 
  about the difference between setting the disk up with Linux raw partition 
  and Oracle cluster file system, I hope someone on the list can give me some 
  hints oruseful reference for reading. The document said for Lunix raw 
  partition I need to setup a partition pertablespace, this is quit a lot 
  considering for Oracle Apps there is about 200 tablespaces. I am 
  wonderingif I am using Oracle Clustering file system (OCFS), can I define 
  one big partition for OCFS and mount it on /u01 and create all the files 
  under this one mount point or the one raw partition per tablespace rule 
  stillapplies.Jos
  
  
  Yahoo! Greetings- Send your seasons greetings 
  online this year!


RE: Linux and Oracle Cluster File System

2003-01-07 Thread Jos
Thanks for the clarification, a lot more to read.
Richard Ji [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Jos,

Yes, you are right that if you use OCFS then you can just have one mount point and create all
data files under it, because OCFS is a file system. It makes it a lot easier to manage space
and you can use commands like: cp, mv, rm etc which you can't do to a raw partition.
Backup on OCFS is also easier than using raw.

Richard Ji

-Original Message-From: Jos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 8:49 AMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: OT: Linux and Oracle Cluster File SystemList,I am a newbie on Linux and Clustering technology, I need to setup a RAC system and have been reading somedocumentation on how to do it. I am a bit confuse about the difference between setting the disk up with Linux raw partition and Oracle cluster file system, I hope someone on the list can give me some hints oruseful reference for reading. The document said for Lunix raw partition I need to setup a partition pertablespace, this is quit a lot considering for Oracle Apps there is about 200 tablespaces. I am wonderingif I am using Oracle Clustering file system (OCFS), can I define one big partition for OCFS and mount it!
 on /u01 and create all the files under this one mount point or the one raw partition per tablespace rule stillapplies.Jos


Yahoo! Greetings- Send your seasons greetings online this year!
Yahoo! Greetings
- Send your seasons greetings online this year!

Re: Linux

2002-10-23 Thread ltiu
Run it on Linux like you would run it on Windows. You do need some Unix skills
for any OS level work though. Otherwise, Oracle is the same (mostly) on both
platforms.

Download Oracle for Linux., It's free for evaluation, education and development
use from http://www.oracle.com

--
Lyndon Tiu

Quoting Turner, Christine [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Greetings ALL!
 
 Have a question for anyone who has infoI'm researching what it would
 take to convert a NT database platform (Oracle 81730) to Linux. I have not
 approached Metalink yet, but will soon. Does anyone have any information on
 Linux? Whether or not Oracle can run on it? Info on the steps involved to
 do
 so?
 
 Thanks,
 Christine Turner
 Sr. Database Administrator
 Scottsdale, Arizona
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
 -- 
 Author: Turner, Christine
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
 San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
 -
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
 




-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: ltiu
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: linux

2002-10-23 Thread Joe Testa
It run beautifully.  i've been running oracle(not so much production but 
up thru testing/QA) on linux platform since 8.0.

I love it.

You know that the datafiles format is not compatible, so the only choice 
to migrate to linux is exp/imp.

It runs on linux like it runs on any other *nix(except for solaris, now 
where do they keep that oratab file, oh yea /var/opt/oracle, instead of 
/etc) :)



Any questions don't hesitate to ask.

Joe



Turner, Christine wrote:

Greetings ALL!

Have a question for anyone who has infoI'm researching what it would
take to convert a NT database platform (Oracle 81730) to Linux. I have not
approached Metalink yet, but will soon. Does anyone have any 
information on
Linux? Whether or not Oracle can run on it? Info on the steps involved 
to do
so?

Thanks,
Christine Turner
Sr. Database Administrator
Scottsdale, Arizona




--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Joe Testa
 INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Linux

2002-10-23 Thread Jim Hawkins
We have Oracle 8.1.7 and 9.2.0 running on Red Hat Linux 7.2 - and love it.  It is not 
a production box though.  We are still in test mode.

Jim Hawkins
Oracle Database Administrator
St. Louis, MO

Turner, Christine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Greetings ALL!

Have a question for anyone who has infoI'm researching what it would
take to convert a NT database platform (Oracle 81730) to Linux. I have not
approached Metalink yet, but will soon. Does anyone have any information on
Linux? Whether or not Oracle can run on it? Info on the steps involved to do
so?

Thanks,
Christine Turner
Sr. Database Administrator
Scottsdale, Arizona
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Turner, Christine
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



-- 


Jim Hawkins
Oracle© / MS SQL*Server© Database Administration

St. Louis, MO  63167




__
The NEW Netscape 7.0 browser is now available. Upgrade now! 
http://channels.netscape.com/ns/browsers/download.jsp 

Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at 
http://webmail.netscape.com/
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Jim Hawkins
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: Linux

2002-10-23 Thread Joe Raube
See http://otn.oracle.com/tech/linux/content.html

It runs very well.

Moving a database from NT to Linux is as easy as export/import. Other
methods exist too.

 
--- Turner, Christine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Greetings ALL!
 
 Have a question for anyone who has infoI'm researching what it
 would
 take to convert a NT database platform (Oracle 81730) to Linux. I
 have not
 approached Metalink yet, but will soon. Does anyone have any
 information on
 Linux? Whether or not Oracle can run on it? Info on the steps
 involved to do
 so?
 
 Thanks,
 Christine Turner
 Sr. Database Administrator
 Scottsdale, Arizona
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
 -- 
 Author: Turner, Christine
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site
http://webhosting.yahoo.com/
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Joe Raube
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: Linux

2002-10-23 Thread Ray Stell

Define Linux.

Check the support matrix.  I liked running on Redhat, but Oracle seemed
to drop support for the free versions after 7.1 or so.  Anyway, you may
want support and so you may want to purchase some of the enterprise
releases of linux, such as from RedHat or SuSE that are included in the
support matrix.

For an inexpensive test environment I moved to Mandrake 9.0 and Oracle
9.2.0 which went together like a glove.  It does require .5GB or ram,
however and is not supported.  I don't care about that for this particular
effort.

Free at last!





On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 08:43:51AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Christine,
 
 Runs fine, but you'll have to use the export/import conversion route.  OH,
 and get use to a different OS.
 
 Dick Goulet
 
 Reply Separator
 Author: Turner; Christine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date:   10/23/2002 8:14 AM
 
 Greetings ALL!
 
 Have a question for anyone who has infoI'm researching what it would
 take to convert a NT database platform (Oracle 81730) to Linux. I have not
 approached Metalink yet, but will soon. Does anyone have any information on
 Linux? Whether or not Oracle can run on it? Info on the steps involved to do
 so?
 
 Thanks,
 Christine Turner
 Sr. Database Administrator
 Scottsdale, Arizona
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
 -- 
 Author: Turner, Christine
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
 San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
 -
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
 
 
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
 -- 
 Author: 
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
 San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
 -
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
===
Ray Stell   [EMAIL PROTECTED] (540) 231-4109 KE4TJC28^D
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Ray Stell
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: linux

2002-10-23 Thread Phil Wilson (DBA)
What distribution/version of Linux would you recommend (RedHat, Suse, etc.)?

Thanks

Phil Wilson  ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
DBA,  Operations Group
SkillSoft, Learning Solutions for the Human Enterprise
506.462.1124(w)
506.447.0334(c)


-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:50 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L

It run beautifully.  i've been running oracle(not so much production but 
up thru testing/QA) on linux platform since 8.0.

I love it.

You know that the datafiles format is not compatible, so the only choice 
to migrate to linux is exp/imp.

It runs on linux like it runs on any other *nix(except for solaris, now 
where do they keep that oratab file, oh yea /var/opt/oracle, instead of 
/etc) :)



Any questions don't hesitate to ask.

Joe



Turner, Christine wrote:

 Greetings ALL!

 Have a question for anyone who has infoI'm researching what it would
 take to convert a NT database platform (Oracle 81730) to Linux. I have not
 approached Metalink yet, but will soon. Does anyone have any 
 information on
 Linux? Whether or not Oracle can run on it? Info on the steps involved 
 to do
 so?

 Thanks,
 Christine Turner
 Sr. Database Administrator
 Scottsdale, Arizona




-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Joe Testa
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Phil Wilson (DBA)
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Linux

2002-10-23 Thread Turner, Christine
Kewlness! Thanks everyone for your input. Totally off the dba subject...does
anyone know of any C++ developers that have information regarding converting
to UNIX. My developers are going stir crazy trying to find any steps to
follow when converting C++ applications for Linux. If not, that's cool, but
thought I would ask.

Thanks,
C-


-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 10:15 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


See http://otn.oracle.com/tech/linux/content.html

It runs very well.

Moving a database from NT to Linux is as easy as export/import. Other
methods exist too.

 
--- Turner, Christine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Greetings ALL!
 
 Have a question for anyone who has infoI'm researching what it
 would
 take to convert a NT database platform (Oracle 81730) to Linux. I
 have not
 approached Metalink yet, but will soon. Does anyone have any
 information on
 Linux? Whether or not Oracle can run on it? Info on the steps
 involved to do
 so?
 
 Thanks,
 Christine Turner
 Sr. Database Administrator
 Scottsdale, Arizona
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
 -- 
 Author: Turner, Christine
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site
http://webhosting.yahoo.com/
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Joe Raube
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Turner, Christine
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: linux

2002-10-23 Thread Joe Testa
Well technically, only the advanced version of RH( are supported, i 
think most if not all(some please clarify) of Suse are supported.

go here:  http://www.redhat.com/oracle_cert/

for the scoop of versions of oracle on which versions of RH are certified.

Joe


Phil Wilson (DBA) wrote:

What distribution/version of Linux would you recommend (RedHat, Suse, etc.)?

Thanks

Phil Wilson  ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
DBA,  Operations Group
SkillSoft, Learning Solutions for the Human Enterprise
506.462.1124(w)
506.447.0334(c)


-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:50 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L

It run beautifully.  i've been running oracle(not so much production but 
up thru testing/QA) on linux platform since 8.0.

I love it.

You know that the datafiles format is not compatible, so the only choice 
to migrate to linux is exp/imp.

It runs on linux like it runs on any other *nix(except for solaris, now 
where do they keep that oratab file, oh yea /var/opt/oracle, instead of 
/etc) :)



Any questions don't hesitate to ask.

Joe



Turner, Christine wrote:

 

Greetings ALL!

Have a question for anyone who has infoI'm researching what it would
take to convert a NT database platform (Oracle 81730) to Linux. I have not
approached Metalink yet, but will soon. Does anyone have any 
information on
Linux? Whether or not Oracle can run on it? Info on the steps involved 
to do
so?

Thanks,
Christine Turner
Sr. Database Administrator
Scottsdale, Arizona
   





 


--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Joe Testa
 INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: Linux

2002-10-23 Thread Ron Rogers
Christine,
 I found it easier ( because I had the OS disks) to load the PC with
RedHat6.2 and then install Oracle 8.1.7. That eliminated the glib and
java problems encountered with the RedHat 7.0 and 7.1 versions. Then I
upgraded the OS to 7.0 and finally 7.1 after I found things ran
perfectly. There are white papers available on the OTN site for
installing Oracle on RedHat versions. I would suggest you read them and
get the required patched on hand if you decide to use RedHat.
 The pc is a 850 MH cpu with 512 M memory and a total of 200 GB disk
across 4  IDE disks with a SCSI 4mm Tape drive and SCSI Cdrom.
Compaired to the currrent production DELL 6500 server with 1- 450 Mh
cpu and 1 G mem with 72 GIG SCSI Raid 5 disk, The Linux box is about 3
times faster than the Dell box running Novell 5 OS and twice as fast as
an Alpha class server with 600 Mh cpu and 1 G Mem. and 72 GIG Raid 5
disks.
 I use the Linux box as a test and play familiarity box to get use to
the new options available  for Oracle and to gain confidence for my OCP
tests.
ROn
ROR mª¿ªm

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/23/02 12:14PM 
Greetings ALL!

Have a question for anyone who has infoI'm researching what it
would
take to convert a NT database platform (Oracle 81730) to Linux. I have
not
approached Metalink yet, but will soon. Does anyone have any
information on
Linux? Whether or not Oracle can run on it? Info on the steps involved
to do
so?

Thanks,
Christine Turner
Sr. Database Administrator
Scottsdale, Arizona
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com 
-- 
Author: Turner, Christine
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com 
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Ron Rogers
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Linux

2002-10-23 Thread Daniel Harron
We have experience numerous problems with high transaction load
databases.  The i/o drivers and memory drivers have proven to be
unstable.  The largest problem seems to occur with the memory drivers.
Try running a linux database with and SGA over 1GB.  We have been able
to duplicate these experiences on Redhat 7.1 - 7.3, running Oracle
8.1.7.3 EE. We have better success running the 2.2 kernel. We plan on
testing Redhat AS 2.1.Otherwise we may stop recommending linux boxes
as oracle database servers.

A particularly bad experience was running a 200+ GB data mart on a linux
box.

If you are running a large production db on oracle/linux, I would really
like to hear about the configuration.

Thanks,

-Daniel

 

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Daniel Harron
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: linux

2002-10-23 Thread Gogala, Mladen
I'll be able to tell you more about 9.2.0.2 on RH 8.0 after this weekend.
I don't expect any trouble.

 -Original Message-
 From: Joe Testa [mailto:jtesta;dmc-it.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:54 PM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 Subject: Re: linux
 
 
 Well technically, only the advanced version of RH( are supported, i 
 think most if not all(some please clarify) of Suse are supported.
 
 go here:  http://www.redhat.com/oracle_cert/
 
 for the scoop of versions of oracle on which versions of RH 
 are certified.
 
 Joe
 
 
 Phil Wilson (DBA) wrote:
 
 What distribution/version of Linux would you recommend 
 (RedHat, Suse, etc.)?
 
 Thanks
 
 Phil Wilson  ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
 DBA,  Operations Group
 SkillSoft, Learning Solutions for the Human Enterprise
 506.462.1124(w)
 506.447.0334(c)
 
 
 -Original Message-
 Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:50 PM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 
 It run beautifully.  i've been running oracle(not so much 
 production but 
 up thru testing/QA) on linux platform since 8.0.
 
 I love it.
 
 You know that the datafiles format is not compatible, so the 
 only choice 
 to migrate to linux is exp/imp.
 
 It runs on linux like it runs on any other *nix(except for 
 solaris, now 
 where do they keep that oratab file, oh yea /var/opt/oracle, 
 instead of 
 /etc) :)
 
 
 
 Any questions don't hesitate to ask.
 
 Joe
 
 
 
 Turner, Christine wrote:
 
   
 
 Greetings ALL!
 
 Have a question for anyone who has infoI'm researching 
 what it would
 take to convert a NT database platform (Oracle 81730) to 
 Linux. I have not
 approached Metalink yet, but will soon. Does anyone have any 
 information on
 Linux? Whether or not Oracle can run on it? Info on the 
 steps involved 
 to do
 so?
 
 Thanks,
 Christine Turner
 Sr. Database Administrator
 Scottsdale, Arizona
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
 -- 
 Author: Joe Testa
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
 San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
 -
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
 
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Gogala, Mladen
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Linux

2002-10-23 Thread Gogala, Mladen
There are tons of IDE software like Anjuta, CodeWarrior, CodeCrusader, Grasp
and alike which can ease up transition. The following URL is, however,
worth looking if you have to deal with hard core Micros*t guys:
http://www.bristol.com/windu/index.html

 -Original Message-
 From: Turner, Christine [mailto:christine.turner;ips-sendero.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:11 PM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 Subject: RE: Linux
 
 
 Kewlness! Thanks everyone for your input. Totally off the dba 
 subject...does
 anyone know of any C++ developers that have information 
 regarding converting
 to UNIX. My developers are going stir crazy trying to find 
 any steps to
 follow when converting C++ applications for Linux. If not, 
 that's cool, but
 thought I would ask.
 
 Thanks,
 C-
 
 
 -Original Message-
 Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 10:15 AM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 
 
 See http://otn.oracle.com/tech/linux/content.html
 
 It runs very well.
 
 Moving a database from NT to Linux is as easy as export/import. Other
 methods exist too.
 
  
 --- Turner, Christine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Greetings ALL!
  
  Have a question for anyone who has infoI'm researching what it
  would
  take to convert a NT database platform (Oracle 81730) to Linux. I
  have not
  approached Metalink yet, but will soon. Does anyone have any
  information on
  Linux? Whether or not Oracle can run on it? Info on the steps
  involved to do
  so?
  
  Thanks,
  Christine Turner
  Sr. Database Administrator
  Scottsdale, Arizona
  -- 
  Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
  -- 
  Author: Turner, Christine
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 __
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site
 http://webhosting.yahoo.com/
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
 -- 
 Author: Joe Raube
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
 San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
 -
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
 -- 
 Author: Turner, Christine
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
 San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
 -
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
 
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Gogala, Mladen
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: linux and Oracle Apps jinit

2002-09-29 Thread Madhavan Amruthur

Hi Ron,

 Has anyone found a way to use linux as a client to Oracle Applications?
  The self service stuff runs
 just fine but the Oracle Forms requires that damnable jinit.  This is
 the only problem left before I
 can give MS the big Heave Ho.
 
I am also in the process of trying to find if I can get Linux to be a
client for Oracle Apps and the only lead I had was that there was once
a Solaris version that can be still made to work and I am trying to
find out if I can get that.

Other than that, I have heard Windows is the only platform that jinit
runs on :-(

Regards,
Madhavan
http://www.dpapps.com

-- 
Madhavan Amruthur
DecisionPoint Applications

-- 
http://fastmail.fm/ - Consolidate POP email and Hotmail in one place
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Madhavan Amruthur
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: Re: LINUX and Oracle Corp.

2002-08-03 Thread chaos

ltiu£¬
  hi, i have the same experience with Jread, Dell does outperform sun, i have Dell 
2550 with 2 1.4G P3CPU/2G memory, with Sun 220 2Gmemory/2CPU, Dell is better than sun 
with regard to oracle responce time and os cpu idle time.
My application is cpu entensive and memory intensive, not much Disk IO.
While the Dell server is only about 4000$, Sun costs about 20K$.

 2002-08-02 19:38:00 You wrote:
RH 2.7 with Oracle 8 and 9 wow!!! where did you get these beasts to work
together?

How come Dell Intels outperform Suns. I don't get it?

ltiu

On Friday 02 August 2002 20:03, you wrote:
 Mladen and all,

 I have a Dell 2500 with 2 1GHZ Pentium III's, 2 Gig of RAM
 and 3 30 Gig RAID1 disk on SCSI.

 It performs rather well, and will run circles around a lightly loaded
 2 CPU Sun 220R we use in production.

 This is my own personal little DBA playground, running RH 2.7, Oracle
 8.1.7 and 9.2.   :)

 Jared

 On Thursday 01 August 2002 09:03, Gogala, Mladen wrote:
  Yes and no. If you put in a decent new Adaptec (AHA) SCSI III adapter,
  it will be capable of working with a 133MHZ or better motherboard and IO
  will be fast, even faster then on an expensive SUN 4xx servers. Of
  course, we must be aware that people are putting sound, webcams, game
  ports and TV cards into their PCs ant that is never a good idea for a
  database server. Personally, I think that a big SMP PC with a few gigs of
  RAM and decent SCSI or FC/AL disk farm can easily service 2 or 3 hundred
  users. One would still need approximately $10,000 to assemble a piece
  like that, but before that, the prices used to have more zeroes. Of
  course, there is that little added  cost of  Oracle RDBMS which will be 2
  times as expensive as the HW it's
  running on and that is really what people don't like.
 
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 6:33 AM
   To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
   Subject: RE: LINUX and Oracle Corp.
  
  
  
  
   -- Cabansay, Yoyong [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 08/01/02
   02:19:10 -0800
  
regarding the above topic but on a different note, anyone
  
   here on the
  
list that is on an Oracle/HP-UX OS platform for backend and
  
   9iAS/Linux
  
on the middle tier? problems encountered? gotchas? stories
  
   to tell. we
  
are looking at this configuration right now for our Oracle Apps 11i.
  
   Main issue w/ most linux boxes is hardware: PC's stink at
   I/O due to the Intel motherboard design. The net result
   tends to be a transfer bottleneck.
  
   --
   Steven Lembark  2930 W. Palmer
   Workhorse Computing  Chicago, IL 60647
  +1 800 762 1582
   --
   Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
   --
   Author:
 INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
   Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
   San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
   
   To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
   to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
   the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
   (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
   also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: ltiu
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

Good luck!

chaos
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

zhu chao
DBA of Eachnet.com
86-021-32174588-667

--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: chaos
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: LINUX and Oracle Corp.

2002-08-03 Thread Jared Still

On Friday 02 August 2002 20:38, ltiu wrote:
 RH 2.7 with Oracle 8 and 9 wow!!! where did you get these beasts to work
 together?

8.1.7 required a bit of work...
9iR1 never did work
9iR2 was fairly simple

The Dell is a fast machine with some nice ultra wide SCSI ports.

The Sun is a low end server.  

Dell doesn't have anything that will keep up with Sun's 
more  offerings.

Jared



 How come Dell Intels outperform Suns. I don't get it?

 ltiu

 On Friday 02 August 2002 20:03, you wrote:
  Mladen and all,
 
  I have a Dell 2500 with 2 1GHZ Pentium III's, 2 Gig of RAM
  and 3 30 Gig RAID1 disk on SCSI.
 
  It performs rather well, and will run circles around a lightly loaded
  2 CPU Sun 220R we use in production.
 
  This is my own personal little DBA playground, running RH 2.7, Oracle
  8.1.7 and 9.2.   :)
 
  Jared
 
  On Thursday 01 August 2002 09:03, Gogala, Mladen wrote:
   Yes and no. If you put in a decent new Adaptec (AHA) SCSI III adapter,
   it will be capable of working with a 133MHZ or better motherboard and
   IO will be fast, even faster then on an expensive SUN 4xx servers. Of
   course, we must be aware that people are putting sound, webcams, game
   ports and TV cards into their PCs ant that is never a good idea for a
   database server. Personally, I think that a big SMP PC with a few gigs
   of RAM and decent SCSI or FC/AL disk farm can easily service 2 or 3
   hundred users. One would still need approximately $10,000 to assemble a
   piece like that, but before that, the prices used to have more zeroes.
   Of course, there is that little added  cost of  Oracle RDBMS which will
   be 2 times as expensive as the HW it's
   running on and that is really what people don't like.
  
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 6:33 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: LINUX and Oracle Corp.
   
   
   
   
-- Cabansay, Yoyong [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 08/01/02
02:19:10 -0800
   
 regarding the above topic but on a different note, anyone
   
here on the
   
 list that is on an Oracle/HP-UX OS platform for backend and
   
9iAS/Linux
   
 on the middle tier? problems encountered? gotchas? stories
   
to tell. we
   
 are looking at this configuration right now for our Oracle Apps
 11i.
   
Main issue w/ most linux boxes is hardware: PC's stink at
I/O due to the Intel motherboard design. The net result
tends to be a transfer bottleneck.
   
--
Steven Lembark  2930 W. Palmer
Workhorse Computing  Chicago, IL 60647
   +1 800 762 1582
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author:
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing
Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the
message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Jared Still
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: LINUX and Oracle Corp.

2002-08-03 Thread ltiu

OK. I should try Linux with Oracle then. Cheap(er) alternative. Cheapest 
would be Linux with Postgresql/MySQL but functionality is not there yet.

Price-wise, is the performace of Dell better than Sun? Dollar/performance ?

How much (cost) is the Dell and how much is the Sun?

ltiu

On Saturday 03 August 2002 10:08, Jared Still wrote:
 On Friday 02 August 2002 20:38, ltiu wrote:
  RH 2.7 with Oracle 8 and 9 wow!!! where did you get these beasts to work
  together?

 8.1.7 required a bit of work...
 9iR1 never did work
 9iR2 was fairly simple

 The Dell is a fast machine with some nice ultra wide SCSI ports.

 The Sun is a low end server.

 Dell doesn't have anything that will keep up with Sun's
 more  offerings.

 Jared
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: ltiu
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: Re: LINUX and Oracle Corp.

2002-08-03 Thread Jared Still


Dunno what you got for 4k, mine was 12k.

Still significantly less than the Sun, which is 
why I asked for it.

Jared

On Saturday 03 August 2002 01:23, chaos wrote:
 ltiu£¬
   hi, i have the same experience with Jread, Dell does outperform sun, i
 have Dell 2550 with 2 1.4G P3CPU/2G memory, with Sun 220 2Gmemory/2CPU,
 Dell is better than sun with regard to oracle responce time and os cpu idle
 time. My application is cpu entensive and memory intensive, not much Disk
 IO. While the Dell server is only about 4000$, Sun costs about 20K$.

  2002-08-02 19:38:00 You wrote:
 RH 2.7 with Oracle 8 and 9 wow!!! where did you get these beasts to work
 together?
 
 How come Dell Intels outperform Suns. I don't get it?
 
 ltiu
 
 On Friday 02 August 2002 20:03, you wrote:
  Mladen and all,
 
  I have a Dell 2500 with 2 1GHZ Pentium III's, 2 Gig of RAM
  and 3 30 Gig RAID1 disk on SCSI.
 
  It performs rather well, and will run circles around a lightly loaded
  2 CPU Sun 220R we use in production.
 
  This is my own personal little DBA playground, running RH 2.7, Oracle
  8.1.7 and 9.2.   :)
 
  Jared
 
  On Thursday 01 August 2002 09:03, Gogala, Mladen wrote:
   Yes and no. If you put in a decent new Adaptec (AHA) SCSI III adapter,
   it will be capable of working with a 133MHZ or better motherboard and
   IO will be fast, even faster then on an expensive SUN 4xx servers. Of
   course, we must be aware that people are putting sound, webcams, game
   ports and TV cards into their PCs ant that is never a good idea for a
   database server. Personally, I think that a big SMP PC with a few gigs
   of RAM and decent SCSI or FC/AL disk farm can easily service 2 or 3
   hundred users. One would still need approximately $10,000 to assemble
   a piece like that, but before that, the prices used to have more
   zeroes. Of course, there is that little added  cost of  Oracle RDBMS
   which will be 2 times as expensive as the HW it's
   running on and that is really what people don't like.
  
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 6:33 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: LINUX and Oracle Corp.
   
   
   
   
-- Cabansay, Yoyong [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 08/01/02
02:19:10 -0800
   
 regarding the above topic but on a different note, anyone
   
here on the
   
 list that is on an Oracle/HP-UX OS platform for backend and
   
9iAS/Linux
   
 on the middle tier? problems encountered? gotchas? stories
   
to tell. we
   
 are looking at this configuration right now for our Oracle Apps
 11i.
   
Main issue w/ most linux boxes is hardware: PC's stink at
I/O due to the Intel motherboard design. The net result
tends to be a transfer bottleneck.
   
--
Steven Lembark  2930 W. Palmer
Workhorse Computing  Chicago, IL 60647
   +1 800 762 1582
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author:
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing
Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the
name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may also
send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
 
 --
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
 --
 Author: ltiu
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
 San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
 
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

 Good luck!

 chaos
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 zhu chao
 DBA of Eachnet.com
 86-021-32174588-667
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Jared Still
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB

Re: LINUX and Oracle Corp.

2002-08-02 Thread Jared Still


Mladen and all,

I have a Dell 2500 with 2 1GHZ Pentium III's, 2 Gig of RAM
and 3 30 Gig RAID1 disk on SCSI.  

It performs rather well, and will run circles around a lightly loaded
2 CPU Sun 220R we use in production.

This is my own personal little DBA playground, running RH 2.7, Oracle
8.1.7 and 9.2.   :)

Jared

On Thursday 01 August 2002 09:03, Gogala, Mladen wrote:
 Yes and no. If you put in a decent new Adaptec (AHA) SCSI III adapter,
 it will be capable of working with a 133MHZ or better motherboard and IO
 will be fast, even faster then on an expensive SUN 4xx servers. Of course,
 we must be aware that people are putting sound, webcams, game ports and TV
 cards into their PCs ant that is never a good idea for a database server.
 Personally, I think that a big SMP PC with a few gigs of RAM and decent
 SCSI or FC/AL disk farm can easily service 2 or 3 hundred users. One would
 still need approximately $10,000 to assemble a piece like that, but before
 that, the prices used to have more zeroes. Of course, there is that little
 added  cost of  Oracle RDBMS which will be 2 times as expensive as the HW
 it's
 running on and that is really what people don't like.

  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 6:33 AM
  To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
  Subject: RE: LINUX and Oracle Corp.
 
 
 
 
  -- Cabansay, Yoyong [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 08/01/02
  02:19:10 -0800
 
   regarding the above topic but on a different note, anyone
 
  here on the
 
   list that is on an Oracle/HP-UX OS platform for backend and
 
  9iAS/Linux
 
   on the middle tier? problems encountered? gotchas? stories
 
  to tell. we
 
   are looking at this configuration right now for our Oracle Apps 11i.
 
  Main issue w/ most linux boxes is hardware: PC's stink at
  I/O due to the Intel motherboard design. The net result
  tends to be a transfer bottleneck.
 
  --
  Steven Lembark  2930 W. Palmer
  Workhorse Computing  Chicago, IL 60647
 +1 800 762 1582
  --
  Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
  --
  Author:
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
  San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
  
  To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
  to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
  the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
  (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
  also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Jared Still
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: LINUX and Oracle Corp.

2002-08-02 Thread ltiu

RH 2.7 with Oracle 8 and 9 wow!!! where did you get these beasts to work 
together?

How come Dell Intels outperform Suns. I don't get it?

ltiu

On Friday 02 August 2002 20:03, you wrote:
 Mladen and all,

 I have a Dell 2500 with 2 1GHZ Pentium III's, 2 Gig of RAM
 and 3 30 Gig RAID1 disk on SCSI.

 It performs rather well, and will run circles around a lightly loaded
 2 CPU Sun 220R we use in production.

 This is my own personal little DBA playground, running RH 2.7, Oracle
 8.1.7 and 9.2.   :)

 Jared

 On Thursday 01 August 2002 09:03, Gogala, Mladen wrote:
  Yes and no. If you put in a decent new Adaptec (AHA) SCSI III adapter,
  it will be capable of working with a 133MHZ or better motherboard and IO
  will be fast, even faster then on an expensive SUN 4xx servers. Of
  course, we must be aware that people are putting sound, webcams, game
  ports and TV cards into their PCs ant that is never a good idea for a
  database server. Personally, I think that a big SMP PC with a few gigs of
  RAM and decent SCSI or FC/AL disk farm can easily service 2 or 3 hundred
  users. One would still need approximately $10,000 to assemble a piece
  like that, but before that, the prices used to have more zeroes. Of
  course, there is that little added  cost of  Oracle RDBMS which will be 2
  times as expensive as the HW it's
  running on and that is really what people don't like.
 
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 6:33 AM
   To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
   Subject: RE: LINUX and Oracle Corp.
  
  
  
  
   -- Cabansay, Yoyong [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 08/01/02
   02:19:10 -0800
  
regarding the above topic but on a different note, anyone
  
   here on the
  
list that is on an Oracle/HP-UX OS platform for backend and
  
   9iAS/Linux
  
on the middle tier? problems encountered? gotchas? stories
  
   to tell. we
  
are looking at this configuration right now for our Oracle Apps 11i.
  
   Main issue w/ most linux boxes is hardware: PC's stink at
   I/O due to the Intel motherboard design. The net result
   tends to be a transfer bottleneck.
  
   --
   Steven Lembark  2930 W. Palmer
   Workhorse Computing  Chicago, IL 60647
  +1 800 762 1582
   --
   Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
   --
   Author:
 INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
   Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
   San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
   
   To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
   to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
   the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
   (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
   also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: ltiu
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: LINUX and Oracle Corp.

2002-08-01 Thread Cabansay, Yoyong

regarding the above topic but on a different note, anyone here on the
list that is on an Oracle/HP-UX OS platform for backend and 9iAS/Linux
on the middle tier? problems encountered? gotchas? stories to tell. we
are looking at this configuration right now for our Oracle Apps 11i.

thanks in advance

Yoyong Cabansay
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 10:54 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Good luck.  When I worked for Oracle in 1998/99 they consolidated all
their
e-mail servers at Corp. in Calif.  What a mess.  Something was wrong
with
the hard drives that continued to fail and we would go for days without
e-mail.  The primary communication media at Oracle is e-mail.  This
lasted
about 2 months when they decided to replace all the HD's with a
different
model.

My $0.02 worth,

Ken Janusz, CPIM

- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 7:38 AM


 How comprehensive is the switch at Oracle?

 I found this reference on the 'net:
 Oracle is even taking its own advice. By the end of this year the
company
 expects it will have moved its 45,000 employees to a strictly
Linux-based
 e-mail database system.

 http://siliconvalley.internet.com/news/article.php/1276851
 This is an older article dating back to June 2002.

 I remember Larry Ellison declaring earlier that he was going to switch
his
 corporation's Oracle Applications to LINUX as well.  I haven't seen
any
 comments / updates on that move on the 'net since.

 Are they moving their whole corporate infrastructure to LINUX?

 Regards,
 Patrice Boivin
 Systems Analyst (Oracle Certified DBA)

 --
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
 --
 Author: Boivin, Patrice J
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
 San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
 
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: KENNETH JANUSZ
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Cabansay, Yoyong
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: LINUX and Oracle Corp.

2002-08-01 Thread lembark



-- Cabansay, Yoyong [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 08/01/02 02:19:10 -0800

 regarding the above topic but on a different note, anyone here on the
 list that is on an Oracle/HP-UX OS platform for backend and 9iAS/Linux
 on the middle tier? problems encountered? gotchas? stories to tell. we
 are looking at this configuration right now for our Oracle Apps 11i.

Main issue w/ most linux boxes is hardware: PC's stink at
I/O due to the Intel motherboard design. The net result 
tends to be a transfer bottleneck. 

--
Steven Lembark  2930 W. Palmer
Workhorse Computing  Chicago, IL 60647
   +1 800 762 1582
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: LINUX and Oracle Corp.

2002-08-01 Thread Gogala, Mladen

Yes and no. If you put in a decent new Adaptec (AHA) SCSI III adapter, 
it will be capable of working with a 133MHZ or better motherboard and IO 
will be fast, even faster then on an expensive SUN 4xx servers. Of course,
we must be aware that people are putting sound, webcams, game ports and TV
cards into their PCs ant that is never a good idea for a database server.
Personally, I think that a big SMP PC with a few gigs of RAM and decent 
SCSI or FC/AL disk farm can easily service 2 or 3 hundred users. One would 
still need approximately $10,000 to assemble a piece like that, but before 
that, the prices used to have more zeroes. Of course, there is that little 
added  cost of  Oracle RDBMS which will be 2 times as expensive as the HW
it's 
running on and that is really what people don't like.

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 6:33 AM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 Subject: RE: LINUX and Oracle Corp.
 
 
 
 
 -- Cabansay, Yoyong [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 08/01/02 
 02:19:10 -0800
 
  regarding the above topic but on a different note, anyone 
 here on the
  list that is on an Oracle/HP-UX OS platform for backend and 
 9iAS/Linux
  on the middle tier? problems encountered? gotchas? stories 
 to tell. we
  are looking at this configuration right now for our Oracle Apps 11i.
 
 Main issue w/ most linux boxes is hardware: PC's stink at
 I/O due to the Intel motherboard design. The net result 
 tends to be a transfer bottleneck. 
 
 --
 Steven Lembark  2930 W. Palmer
 Workhorse Computing  Chicago, IL 60647
+1 800 762 1582
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
 -- 
 Author: 
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
 San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
 
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
 
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Gogala, Mladen
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: LINUX and Oracle Corp.

2002-07-31 Thread KENNETH JANUSZ

Good luck.  When I worked for Oracle in 1998/99 they consolidated all their
e-mail servers at Corp. in Calif.  What a mess.  Something was wrong with
the hard drives that continued to fail and we would go for days without
e-mail.  The primary communication media at Oracle is e-mail.  This lasted
about 2 months when they decided to replace all the HD's with a different
model.

My $0.02 worth,

Ken Janusz, CPIM

- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 7:38 AM


 How comprehensive is the switch at Oracle?

 I found this reference on the 'net:
 Oracle is even taking its own advice. By the end of this year the company
 expects it will have moved its 45,000 employees to a strictly Linux-based
 e-mail database system.

 http://siliconvalley.internet.com/news/article.php/1276851
 This is an older article dating back to June 2002.

 I remember Larry Ellison declaring earlier that he was going to switch his
 corporation's Oracle Applications to LINUX as well.  I haven't seen any
 comments / updates on that move on the 'net since.

 Are they moving their whole corporate infrastructure to LINUX?

 Regards,
 Patrice Boivin
 Systems Analyst (Oracle Certified DBA)

 --
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
 --
 Author: Boivin, Patrice J
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
 San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
 
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: KENNETH JANUSZ
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Linux SuSe question?

2002-07-17 Thread Grabowy, Chris

The download takes forever because you have to download each and every
single file...unlike RH

You can buy it for 30 bucks.  I think the enterprise version is like 90
dollars.  

-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 5:09 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Is the downloadable version of SuSe Linux good to run Oracle or should I buy
it from the store?

This is for my own research.

Thanks

Waleed
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Khedr, Waleed
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Grabowy, Chris
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: linux vs any other os

2002-06-04 Thread Sherman, Edward

Although not very scientific, this one is always fun to watch.

http://srom.zgp.org/

Good Luck,
Ed

-Original Message-
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:23 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Hi All,

Anyone have any sites where they are doing performance compares of linux vs 
solaris  or any other OS.

TiA,

-bill


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Bill Conner
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


* * * * * Freedom of Information Act Notice * * * * * 
The information in this email is subject to the record protection mandated
by 5 United States Code 552 (b) (4) and relevant judicial opinions.
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Sherman, Edward
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: linux vs any other os

2002-06-04 Thread Gogala, Mladen

Ite misa est, Linux is the best!

 -Original Message-
 From: Sherman, Edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 12:53 PM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 Subject: RE: linux vs any other os
 
 
 Although not very scientific, this one is always fun to watch.
 
 http://srom.zgp.org/
 
 Good Luck,
 Ed
 
 -Original Message-
 Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:23 PM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 
 
 Hi All,
 
 Anyone have any sites where they are doing performance 
 compares of linux vs 
 solaris  or any other OS.
 
 TiA,
 
   -bill
 
 
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
 -- 
 Author: Bill Conner
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
 San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
 
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
 
 
 * * * * * Freedom of Information Act Notice * * * * * 
 The information in this email is subject to the record 
 protection mandated
 by 5 United States Code 552 (b) (4) and relevant judicial opinions.
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
 -- 
 Author: Sherman, Edward
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
 San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
 
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
 
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Gogala, Mladen
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: RE: linux vs any other os

2002-06-04 Thread kkennedy

I thought they were calling it Windux...

-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 11:49 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Interesting, Windows sucks harder that Linux rules!!  BTW: anyone here on the
Lindows Beta test??

Dick Goulet

Reply Separator
Author: Gogala; Mladen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:   6/4/2002 10:09 AM

Ite misa est, Linux is the best!

 -Original Message-
 From: Sherman, Edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 12:53 PM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 Subject: RE: linux vs any other os
 
 
 Although not very scientific, this one is always fun to watch.
 
 http://srom.zgp.org/
 
 Good Luck,
 Ed
 
 -Original Message-
 Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:23 PM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 
 
 Hi All,
 
 Anyone have any sites where they are doing performance 
 compares of linux vs 
 solaris  or any other OS.
 
 TiA,
 
   -bill
 
 
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
 -- 
 Author: Bill Conner
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
 San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
 
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
 
 
 * * * * * Freedom of Information Act Notice * * * * * 
 The information in this email is subject to the record 
 protection mandated
 by 5 United States Code 552 (b) (4) and relevant judicial opinions.
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
 -- 
 Author: Sherman, Edward
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
 San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
 
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
 
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Gogala, Mladen
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: kkennedy
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Linux for Big(ish) Databases

2002-03-07 Thread James Morle

Bill,

In general terms, I would say that it is certainly suitable. That answer
is based upon the information you provide below. The real answer could
only be ascertained by evaluating other requirements:
A) Availability
B) Scalability
C) 'Cost' of each user - what do the transactions look like

Don't fall into the trap of treating the machine as a PC - many
implementations of Linux/Oracle apply the cost-reduced approach all the
way across the system. You save money on the server and OS, but you
should still make sure your I/O requirements are well catered for. 
From a CPU standpoint, you are probably more than OK. A quad Xeon
machine has more power than you need in all likelihood (again,
APPLICATION DEPENDENT - a single user can suck down 4 Xeons if they want
to...). Memory, no problem - 4GB should be more than enough, and Linux
is pretty well proven up to this level. 
The big downsides are thus:
A) PCI bus bandwidth. Unless you go for a system with multiple PCI buses
(they are available, but I've not personally run Linux on one of these),
you are limited to a maximum theoretical bandwidth of width*clock: 33MHz
* 32-bit= ~132MB/s, 66MHz*64-bit= 528MB/s. 
B) Crash Dumps. If you hit an OS problem, who do you go to, and what do
you give them?
C) Memory bandwidth. RDRAM or at least DDR memory solutions should be
used where possible. This is where the P4 is actually worth considering.
Forget all the 'extensions' stuff, though - Oracle is pretty much a pure
INTEGER compute load. The thing you get that's worth having with the P4
is 400MHz front side bus - Memory Bandwidth!

I would recommend, in the complete absence of any real workload
knowledge ( ;-) ) to go for a 2-way P4 system based upon the ServerWorks
GC-HE chipset. Something like the Dell PowerEdge 4600. This will give
you a) memory bandwidth more balanced against the CPU power, b) lots of
PCI bandwidth. 
Hope that is of use. 

Regards

James


--
James Morle
Scale Abilities, Ltd
http://www.scaleabilities.co.uk
Author of Scaling Oracle8i - Building Highly Scalable OLTP System
Architectures

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of 
 Bill Buchan
 Sent: 04 March 2002 10:18
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 Subject: Linux for Big(ish) Databases
 
 
 
 
 
 We've got a new database to put together.  OLTP, 100-200 
 users, ~250Gb 
 data.  We haven't decided on a platform for this yet.  Is 
 Intel/Linux worth 
 considering for this size of thing?
 
 Thanks
 - Bill.
 
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
 -- 
 Author: Bill Buchan
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
 San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
 
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') 
 and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB 
 ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed 
 from).  You may also send the HELP command for other 
 information (like subscribing).
 


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: James Morle
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: Linux command to display total disk capacity

2002-03-05 Thread Marin Dimitrov


- Original Message -

 Does someone know what command can be used to display total capacity of
disk
 drive?  I can use command df -k but it breaks partitions apart so I have
 to add them up.  I need command just display a total.


for an IDE drive do:

cat /proc/ide/xxx/capacity

...where xxx is the disk drive u're interested in (hda, hdb,...). The size
returned is in 512b blocks


for SCSI it's not that easy


hth,

Marin


...what you brought from your past, is of no use in your present. When
you must choose a new path, do not bring old experiences with you.
Those who strike out afresh, but who attempt to retain a little of the
old life, end up torn apart by their own memories. 



-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Marin Dimitrov
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Linux command to display total disk capacity

2002-03-05 Thread Michael Cupp

Disk capacity is relevant to partition.  Your df -k could show 10 partitions, this 
could be 10 1 drive, or 10.  You might find what you need in fdisk, but use it with 
caution if you aren't a unix admin.

-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 9:59 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Does someone know what command can be used to display total capacity of disk drive?  I 
can use command df -k but it breaks partitions apart so I have to add them up.  I 
need command just display a total.

Thanks,
David
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Nguyen, David M
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, 
include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be 
removed from).  You may also send the HELP command for other information (like 
subscribing).
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Michael Cupp
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: Linux command to display total disk capacity

2002-03-05 Thread Alex

pipe df -k to awk and sum the column you want


On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Nguyen, David M wrote:

 Does someone know what command can be used to display total capacity of disk
 drive?  I can use command df -k but it breaks partitions apart so I have
 to add them up.  I need command just display a total.
 
 Thanks,
 David
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
 -- 
 Author: Nguyen, David M
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
 San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
 
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
 

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Alex
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: Linux for Big(ish) Databases

2002-03-04 Thread Steven Lembark



 We've got a new database to put together.  OLTP, 100-200 users, ~250Gb
 data.  We haven't decided on a platform for this yet.  Is Intel/Linux
 worth considering for this size of thing?

No reason why not. Might also want to consider linux
on a Sparc or Alpha.



--
Steven Lembark   2930 W. Palmer
Workhorse Computing   Chicago, IL 60647
+1 800 762 1582
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Steven Lembark
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Linux for Big(ish) Databases

2002-03-04 Thread Jesse, Rich

The problem with Linux on Sparc or Alpha is that Oracle doesn't have
binaries for them.  I've requested Alpha binaries, but haven't had any
response, despite the 1-2 business days response.  sigh

GL!

Rich Jesse   System/Database Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Quad/Tech International, Sussex, WI USA


-Original Message-
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 9:53 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L




 We've got a new database to put together.  OLTP, 100-200 users, ~250Gb
 data.  We haven't decided on a platform for this yet.  Is Intel/Linux
 worth considering for this size of thing?

No reason why not. Might also want to consider linux
on a Sparc or Alpha.
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Jesse, Rich
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Linux for Big(ish) Databases

2002-03-04 Thread Gogala, Mladen

May be they'll release the source code and distribute it under the GPL
license?

 -Original Message-
 From: Jesse, Rich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:03 PM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 Subject: RE: Linux for Big(ish) Databases
 
 
 The problem with Linux on Sparc or Alpha is that Oracle doesn't have
 binaries for them.  I've requested Alpha binaries, but haven't had any
 response, despite the 1-2 business days response.  sigh
 
 GL!
 
 Rich Jesse   System/Database Administrator
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Quad/Tech International, 
 Sussex, WI USA
 
 
 -Original Message-
 Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 9:53 AM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 
 
 
 
  We've got a new database to put together.  OLTP, 100-200 
 users, ~250Gb
  data.  We haven't decided on a platform for this yet.  Is 
 Intel/Linux
  worth considering for this size of thing?
 
 No reason why not. Might also want to consider linux
 on a Sparc or Alpha.
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
 -- 
 Author: Jesse, Rich
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
 San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
 
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
 
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Gogala, Mladen
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Linux for Big(ish) Databases

2002-03-04 Thread lembark



-- Jesse, Rich [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 03/04/02 09:03:28 -0800

 The problem with Linux on Sparc or Alpha is that Oracle doesn't have
 binaries for them.  I've requested Alpha binaries, but haven't had any
 response, despite the 1-2 business days response.  sigh

Remember: They're Oracle, you're not. Be glad they take
their precious time to not answer your questions!

The main problem with Intel boxes is a narrow I/O bus and
latency issues with the chipsets. The VIA set tends to be
faster so far as I've seen. Combined with good SCSI boards
and LVM striping you can get decent throughput, but it'll
never match something like a V-box or 6500 for full-bore
speed. The real alpha motherboards (not NT compatable
toys) use wide I/O channels to keep the chip fed.

If you're considering linux look carefully at clusters.
They can be an immense help dealing with large databases.

--
Steven Lembark  2930 W. Palmer
Workhorse Computing  Chicago, IL 60647
   +1 800 762 1582
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: Linux Cluster

2002-02-22 Thread Bjørn Engsig

On Friday 22 February 2002 16:03, Henrik Ekenberg wrote:

 Who is your configuration ?

Two nodes running in VMWare on an HP laptop
 2- Which Linux version ?
RH 7.1 + logical volume manager
 3- Which Oracle version ?
9.0.1.2.0
 4- Is is fun ?
That depends.

-- 
Bjørn Engsig, Miracle A/S
http://MiracleAS.dk
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: =?iso-8859-1?q?Bj=F8rn=20Engsig?=
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Linux Cluster

2002-02-22 Thread James Morle

I'm also running it on two Vmware machines running Linux on my laptop.
I'm currently working on a 'real' cluster, using a mixture of SMP linux
boxes on a shared SCSI array. Two nodes, no problem. Three nodes, big
problem. I believe it still to be electrical on the SCSI bus, so watch
this space. If you have a choice, use FC, preferably switched!
Oracle version: 9.0.1.2
Is it fun? I always say - If you really want to learn about how Oracle
instances work, run OPS. I don't say that anymore, because they changed
the name to RAC. But that's the only change to the saying. I love it
though, it's loads of fun, but very much in a masochistic way. 
In the particular case of Linux, if anyone worked on any big multi-node
OPS configurations about ten years ago, you have a good idea of what
it's like now on Linux

Regards

James

--
James Morle
Scale Abilities, Ltd
http://www.scaleabilities.co.uk
Author of Scaling Oracle8i - Building Highly Scalable OLTP System
Architectures

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of 
 Henrik Ekenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 22 February 2002 15:03
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 Subject: Linux Cluster
 
 
 Hi from the Swow storm from Sweden,
 
 We wants to try to run Oracle on a Linux Cluster.
 Is someone using Oracle on a Linux Cluster ?
 
 Who is your configuration ?
 1- (DELL,HP,Compaq,..)
 2- Which Linux version ?
 3- Which Oracle version ?
 4- Is is fun ?
 
 Best Regards,
 HEnrik
 
 -- 
 --
 -
 There's fun in being serious.
 
 -- Wynton Marsalis
 
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
 -- 
 Author: Henrik Ekenber
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
 San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
 
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') 
 and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB 
 ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed 
 from).  You may also send the HELP command for other 
 information (like subscribing).
 


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: James Morle
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: Linux Cluster

2002-02-22 Thread Anjo Kolk

I wish that I had some of that 10 year ago OPS experience ;-)

Anjo.

- Original Message - 
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 5:53 PM


 I'm also running it on two Vmware machines running Linux on my laptop.
 I'm currently working on a 'real' cluster, using a mixture of SMP linux
 boxes on a shared SCSI array. Two nodes, no problem. Three nodes, big
 problem. I believe it still to be electrical on the SCSI bus, so watch
 this space. If you have a choice, use FC, preferably switched!
 Oracle version: 9.0.1.2
 Is it fun? I always say - If you really want to learn about how Oracle
 instances work, run OPS. I don't say that anymore, because they changed
 the name to RAC. But that's the only change to the saying. I love it
 though, it's loads of fun, but very much in a masochistic way. 
 In the particular case of Linux, if anyone worked on any big multi-node
 OPS configurations about ten years ago, you have a good idea of what
 it's like now on Linux
 
 Regards
 
 James
 
 --
 James Morle
 Scale Abilities, Ltd
 http://www.scaleabilities.co.uk
 Author of Scaling Oracle8i - Building Highly Scalable OLTP System
 Architectures
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of 
  Henrik Ekenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: 22 February 2002 15:03
  To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
  Subject: Linux Cluster
  
  
  Hi from the Swow storm from Sweden,
  
  We wants to try to run Oracle on a Linux Cluster.
  Is someone using Oracle on a Linux Cluster ?
  
  Who is your configuration ?
  1- (DELL,HP,Compaq,..)
  2- Which Linux version ?
  3- Which Oracle version ?
  4- Is is fun ?
  
  Best Regards,
  HEnrik
  
  -- 
  --
  -
  There's fun in being serious.
  
  -- Wynton Marsalis
  
  -- 
  Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
  -- 
  Author: Henrik Ekenber
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
  San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
  
  To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
  to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') 
  and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB 
  ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed 
  from).  You may also send the HELP command for other 
  information (like subscribing).
  
 
 
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
 -- 
 Author: James Morle
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
 San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
 
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Anjo Kolk
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: Linux taking over at Oracle

2002-02-01 Thread Stephane Faroult

I am afraid we have seen too many 'flavour-of-the-month' fads already. I
fear that Larry is about as clueless as I am about the immediate future
of IT and Oracle's 'strategy' has more or less been a succession of more
or less well inspired tactical moves. I have known Oracle when
distribution of everything was all the rage. Concerning Jonathan's
reference to the email servers, I remember having read some years ago in
a plane in a non-IT paper (FT or Wall Street Journal, can't remember) a
longish interview of Larry where he was bragging about his being an
engineer, his conviction that it was doable and how he had imposed his
will (big effort, when you know how slavish some may be at Oracle :-)),
especially against Oracle Singapore, and, if I remember well, Oracle
Canada. A few months later, electricians working in Redwood Shores to
make electricity supplies redundant or something similar goofed (not the
exclusivity of DBAs) and as a result THE WHOLE OF ORACLE, WORLDWIDE, HAD
NO E-MAIL FOR TWO DAYS. Note that when it's deep night in California
some people at Oracle do not seem to understand that in Asia everybody
is working, and in Europe too. It must have been an enormous roar of
laughter in Singapore and in Canada. The problem with centralised
systems is that there is another company, which I do not understand why
it is feared so much by Oracle if their systems really are as slow as
the Oracle ads pretend, which has been doing it already for about 40
years, and it doing it rather well.
Concerning the hardware, same story. Historically Oracle was first
developed on PDPs, then moved to VAXes. In the mid 1980s development was
supposed to be done on Sun boxes, however, strangely, the VMS port still
was the first to be available. There has been a time when we heard a lot
about N-Cube (remember?), of which Larry was a big shareholder, then
about Sequent (ditto). Then it looked like honeymoon with Sun, till the
climate deteriorated amongst accusations of unfairness (for what I have
heard, Oracle was a bigger customer of Sun than the reverse). Oracle
fell for HP. Given the current row about the Compaq takeover, I am not
surprised that it has cooled. Larry must wait for Ms Fiorina's head to
roll in the sand. It's terrible how much what is usually presented as
'vision', 'strategy' etc. is often hardly more than personal inimities
(Bill Gates being to many CEOs what the Taleban were to Afghan warlords)
and opportunistic alliances.

My 0.02 euros.

S Faroult

Deshpande, Kirti wrote:
 
 Ah!! But 5 years down the road, Larry's Oracle database may not need any
 administration at all. You may just buy the pre-fabricated OraLintel
 gadget from him that runs your apps...  :-))
 Seriously, he me getting in position to fight the IBM Linux Mainframe
 running DB2(IBM announced the Linux MF not too long ago) and claim/prove(?)
 Oracle+Linux+Intel runs much faster than IBM's Linux mainframe..
 
 - Kirti
 
 -Original Message-
 Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 8:35 PM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 
 Interesting news. Makes me wonder though. Remember when
 Oracle moved to support client-server computing? Now Larry
 derides client-server and distributed computing saying
 that it's cheaper to have just one big system. How many
 times have you heard Larry talk about how Oracle's
 consolidated their email servers? Makes me wonder whether
 five years down the road Larry will be telling us that it's
 silly to run a database on 50 cheap boxes because it's
 much easier to administer one big one.
 
 Best regards,
 
 Jonathan Gennick
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * 906.387.1698
 http://Gennick.com * http://MichiganWaterfalls.com * http://ValleySpur.com
 
 Thursday, January 31, 2002, 2:36:21 PM, you wrote:
 AMG0 Ellison says Oracle's 'whole business' to run on Linux
 
 AMG0 The Oracle chairman and CEO said the company will replace three Unix
 AMG0 servers
 AMG0 that run the bulk of its business applications with a cluster of Intel
 AMG0 Corp.
 AMG0 servers running Linux.
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Stephane Faroult
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Linux taking over at Oracle

2002-02-01 Thread Jamadagni, Rajendra

We had a small discussion yesterday about Oracle moving to Linux (possibly),
so my SA asks ... Is there any OS vendor left in the market that Uncle L
hasn't pissed off yet? Sun was dumped in favor of HP, they already pissed
off IBM because of DB/2, not dumping HP they move to Linux. So I told him
that wait, they haven't done anything yet to MacOS, (after revival) CP/M
(and a bunch of other Operating Systems).

Raj
__
Rajendra Jamadagni  MIS, ESPN Inc.
Rajendra dot Jamadagni at ESPN dot com
Any opinion expressed here is personal and doesn't reflect that of ESPN Inc.

QOTD: Any clod can have facts, but having an opinion is an art!



*2

This e-mail message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) above 
and may contain information that is privileged, attorney work product or exempt from 
disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this message in error, or are 
not the named recipient(s), please immediately notify corporate MIS at (860) 766-2000 
and delete this e-mail message from your computer, Thank you.

*2




Re: Linux taking over at Oracle

2002-02-01 Thread Rachel Carmichael

it's not just Oracle, this tends to be a trend in all businesses. Just
as there are fads in clothing (shorter hemlines, longer hemlines etc),
there seem to be fads in the right way to manage your computer
systems.

I've seen the cycle turn a number of times centralize all software and
systems, one data center to serve them all, standards cross-company
then suddenly it's decentralize, one big center makes no sense, we
don't get the things we need fast enough from them


--- Jonathan Gennick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Interesting news. Makes me wonder though. Remember when
 Oracle moved to support client-server computing? Now Larry
 derides client-server and distributed computing saying
 that it's cheaper to have just one big system. How many
 times have you heard Larry talk about how Oracle's
 consolidated their email servers? Makes me wonder whether
 five years down the road Larry will be telling us that it's
 silly to run a database on 50 cheap boxes because it's
 much easier to administer one big one.
 
 Best regards,
 
 Jonathan Gennick   
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * 906.387.1698
 http://Gennick.com * http://MichiganWaterfalls.com *
 http://ValleySpur.com
 
 Thursday, January 31, 2002, 2:36:21 PM, you wrote:
 AMG0 Ellison says Oracle's 'whole business' to run on Linux
 
 AMG0 The Oracle chairman and CEO said the company will replace three
 Unix
 AMG0 servers
 AMG0 that run the bulk of its business applications with a cluster
 of Intel
 AMG0 Corp.
 AMG0 servers running Linux.
 
 AMG0

http://computerworld.com/nlt/1%2C3590%2CNAV47_STO67867_NLTAM%2C00.html
 
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
 -- 
 Author: Jonathan Gennick
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
 San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing
 Lists
 
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo! Auctions! 
http://auctions.yahoo.com
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Rachel Carmichael
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: Linux taking over at Oracle

2002-02-01 Thread Stephane Faroult

In a previous life in the 1980s, an IBM salesman has told me a funny
story about an IBM marketing guy who was a specialist of strategy
speeches, future of IT, etc. The salesman took a customer to a
presentation once, and was very impressed by the speech in which the
marketing man was demonstrating, extremely logically, that the future of
IT was centralized big servers. As he had been so impressed, he took
another customer to the same presentation a few months later, and, as he
had already heard it, listened a bit less attentively. He began to
startle around the conclusion, which no less logically than the first
time was proving beyond any doubt that the future of IT was made of
distributed processing power (IBM had announced the PC in the meantime).
The salesman told me he had never understood where the logic had
derailed.
I have heard the marketing guy myself, he was VERY good.

Rachel Carmichael wrote:
 
 it's not just Oracle, this tends to be a trend in all businesses. Just
 as there are fads in clothing (shorter hemlines, longer hemlines etc),
 there seem to be fads in the right way to manage your computer
 systems.
 
 I've seen the cycle turn a number of times centralize all software and
 systems, one data center to serve them all, standards cross-company
 then suddenly it's decentralize, one big center makes no sense, we
 don't get the things we need fast enough from them
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Stephane Faroult
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: Linux taking over at Oracle

2002-02-01 Thread orantdba

Hi All,

I don't think anything here indicates that we are going back to hundreds 
of smaller databases.  I does indicate that he is pushing the Real 
Application Clusters on thes smaller boxes so that they can continue to 
support large databases.

John

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Jonathan,

I remember reading an article in Oracle Magazine about a year to year  a
half ago, where Uncle Larry was prostelatizing us to create one large database
vs. having lots of small ones.  So the screw turns once more!!  Also I remember
Oracle being torqued at RedHat some time ago  find that 9i is NOT certified on
RedHat.  Guess that will change!  Also, for those who remember, Uncle Larry did
predict that the database would replace the operating system some years ago. 
Funny how these ideas change, don't materialize, or have other problems that
prevent them becoming reality.  But then I guess that's what you get trying to
read a foggy crystal ball!! :-)

My problem with all of this is that he's pointing us towards cheaper
computers and operating systems, but will the cost of Oracle itself follow??  I
doubt it.  Which puts a pile of us in a rather sticky position.  How do you
justify $40K for Oracle on a $10K computer with a $0 OS?

My brain hurts.

Dick Goulet

BTW: Uncle Larry torqued off Apple (MacOS) some years ago when he dropped
support for it all together.

Reply Separator
Author: Jonathan Gennick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:   1/31/2002 6:35 PM

Interesting news. Makes me wonder though. Remember when
Oracle moved to support client-server computing? Now Larry
derides client-server and distributed computing saying
that it's cheaper to have just one big system. How many
times have you heard Larry talk about how Oracle's
consolidated their email servers? Makes me wonder whether
five years down the road Larry will be telling us that it's
silly to run a database on 50 cheap boxes because it's
much easier to administer one big one.

Best regards,

Jonathan Gennick   
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * 906.387.1698
http://Gennick.com * http://MichiganWaterfalls.com * http://ValleySpur.com

Thursday, January 31, 2002, 2:36:21 PM, you wrote:
AMG0 Ellison says Oracle's 'whole business' to run on Linux

AMG0 The Oracle chairman and CEO said the company will replace three Unix
AMG0 servers
AMG0 that run the bulk of its business applications with a cluster of Intel
AMG0 Corp.
AMG0 servers running Linux.

AMG0 http://computerworld.com/nlt/1%2C3590%2CNAV47_STO67867_NLTAM%2C00.html



-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: orantdba
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Linux taking over at Oracle

2002-02-01 Thread Orr, Steve

On a contrarian note with all the Larry hype aside... Linux is much more
that just a fad. In a relatively short time it has already put a very
significant dent in MS server software sales and I'm sure it's going to 
affect Sun/HP regardless of Oracle's IT infrastructure strategies. 
Linux/Intel is a proven production quality platform and having worked
with Linux/Oracle servers for over a year now I conclude that the Linux
revolution is not going away like just another fad. In fact, it's just
getting started. BTW, I'm getting ready to buy a ReplayTV unit and guess
what it runs on?  ... LINUX!!!

If you want to get a good idea of what folks are doing with Oracle on 
Linux just join the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list or go to
http://www.suse.com/en/support/oracle/index.html ... etc.

I think the point behind all this is that, large, complex servers can be
a support challenge with capacity planning for always on, 24x7, 
unlimited future scalability needs.

Rather than racking our brains we should be RAC'ing our servers.


Steve Orr,
Montana Revolutionary


-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 5:40 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


it's not just Oracle, this tends to be a trend in all businesses. Just
as there are fads in clothing (shorter hemlines, longer hemlines etc),
there seem to be fads in the right way to manage your computer
systems.

I've seen the cycle turn a number of times centralize all software and
systems, one data center to serve them all, standards cross-company
then suddenly it's decentralize, one big center makes no sense, we
don't get the things we need fast enough from them

--- Jonathan Gennick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Interesting news. Makes me wonder though. Remember when
 Oracle moved to support client-server computing? Now Larry
 derides client-server and distributed computing saying
 that it's cheaper to have just one big system. How many
 times have you heard Larry talk about how Oracle's
 consolidated their email servers? Makes me wonder whether
 five years down the road Larry will be telling us that it's
 silly to run a database on 50 cheap boxes because it's
 much easier to administer one big one.
 
 Best regards,
 
 Jonathan Gennick   
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * 906.387.1698
 http://Gennick.com * http://MichiganWaterfalls.com *
 http://ValleySpur.com
 
 Thursday, January 31, 2002, 2:36:21 PM, you wrote:
 AMG0 Ellison says Oracle's 'whole business' to run on Linux
 
 AMG0 The Oracle chairman and CEO said the company will replace three
 Unix
 AMG0 servers
 AMG0 that run the bulk of its business applications with a cluster
 of Intel
 AMG0 Corp.
 AMG0 servers running Linux.
 
 AMG0

http://computerworld.com/nlt/1%2C3590%2CNAV47_STO67867_NLTAM%2C00.html
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Orr, Steve
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Linux taking over at Oracle

2002-02-01 Thread Jesse, Rich

I think that the LVM announcement in the link below is the lynchpin for
getting Linux Enterprise-wide (man, I hate buzzwords!):

http://www.veritas.com/news/press/PressReleaseDetail.jhtml?NewsId=9483

Now if I could only get Oracle on Linux for Alpha, I'd be set!

Rich Jesse   System/Database Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Quad/Tech International, Sussex, WI USA


-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 9:56 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


On a contrarian note with all the Larry hype aside... Linux is much more
that just a fad. In a relatively short time it has already put a very
significant dent in MS server software sales and I'm sure it's going to 
affect Sun/HP regardless of Oracle's IT infrastructure strategies. 
Linux/Intel is a proven production quality platform and having worked
with Linux/Oracle servers for over a year now I conclude that the Linux
revolution is not going away like just another fad. In fact, it's just
getting started. BTW, I'm getting ready to buy a ReplayTV unit and guess
what it runs on?  ... LINUX!!!

If you want to get a good idea of what folks are doing with Oracle on 
Linux just join the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list or go to
http://www.suse.com/en/support/oracle/index.html ... etc.

I think the point behind all this is that, large, complex servers can be
a support challenge with capacity planning for always on, 24x7, 
unlimited future scalability needs.

Rather than racking our brains we should be RAC'ing our servers.


Steve Orr,
Montana Revolutionary
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Jesse, Rich
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Linux taking over at Oracle

2002-02-01 Thread John Kanagaraj

 I've seen the cycle turn a number of times centralize all 
 software and
 systems, one data center to serve them all, standards cross-company
 then suddenly it's decentralize, one big center makes no sense, we
 don't get the things we need fast enough from them

I always think that thinking in IT is like a huge pendulum in one of those
granfather clocks - swing one way this year, swing the other way the next,
and back again we go! Whatever direction it swings, there has to be some
springs and gears and wheels that makes it all work. DBAs are  a small but
important part of that clock - we only have to watch out for that
piezo-electric crytal and LED/LCDs that *may* make us moving parts
redundant.

Just another lesson in Life from yours truly!

John Kanagaraj
Oracle Applications DBA
DBSoft Inc
(W): 408-970-7002

Fear is the darkroom where Evil develops your negatives. 
Wanna break free of fear? Click on 'http://www.needhim.org'

** The opinions and statements above are entirely my own and not those of my
employer or clients **
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: John Kanagaraj
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Linux taking over at Oracle

2002-02-01 Thread Grabowy, Chris

I thought it also put a dent in HP/UX  Solaris sales...easier to migrate
UNIX to Linux.  I believe Amazon is a good example.  For the record, I have
no love for MS.

Congrats on your ReplayTV, it will blow your mind once you fully grasp it's
usefulness.  I love my TiVo, and I can't live without it.  Looking forward
to the Superbowl, and doing my own replays, slow motion plays back and
forth, etc.

-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:56 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


On a contrarian note with all the Larry hype aside... Linux is much more
that just a fad. In a relatively short time it has already put a very
significant dent in MS server software sales and I'm sure it's going to 
affect Sun/HP regardless of Oracle's IT infrastructure strategies. 
Linux/Intel is a proven production quality platform and having worked
with Linux/Oracle servers for over a year now I conclude that the Linux
revolution is not going away like just another fad. In fact, it's just
getting started. BTW, I'm getting ready to buy a ReplayTV unit and guess
what it runs on?  ... LINUX!!!

If you want to get a good idea of what folks are doing with Oracle on 
Linux just join the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list or go to
http://www.suse.com/en/support/oracle/index.html ... etc.

I think the point behind all this is that, large, complex servers can be
a support challenge with capacity planning for always on, 24x7, 
unlimited future scalability needs.

Rather than racking our brains we should be RAC'ing our servers.


Steve Orr,
Montana Revolutionary


-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 5:40 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


it's not just Oracle, this tends to be a trend in all businesses. Just
as there are fads in clothing (shorter hemlines, longer hemlines etc),
there seem to be fads in the right way to manage your computer
systems.

I've seen the cycle turn a number of times centralize all software and
systems, one data center to serve them all, standards cross-company
then suddenly it's decentralize, one big center makes no sense, we
don't get the things we need fast enough from them

--- Jonathan Gennick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Interesting news. Makes me wonder though. Remember when
 Oracle moved to support client-server computing? Now Larry
 derides client-server and distributed computing saying
 that it's cheaper to have just one big system. How many
 times have you heard Larry talk about how Oracle's
 consolidated their email servers? Makes me wonder whether
 five years down the road Larry will be telling us that it's
 silly to run a database on 50 cheap boxes because it's
 much easier to administer one big one.
 
 Best regards,
 
 Jonathan Gennick   
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * 906.387.1698
 http://Gennick.com * http://MichiganWaterfalls.com *
 http://ValleySpur.com
 
 Thursday, January 31, 2002, 2:36:21 PM, you wrote:
 AMG0 Ellison says Oracle's 'whole business' to run on Linux
 
 AMG0 The Oracle chairman and CEO said the company will replace three
 Unix
 AMG0 servers
 AMG0 that run the bulk of its business applications with a cluster
 of Intel
 AMG0 Corp.
 AMG0 servers running Linux.
 
 AMG0

http://computerworld.com/nlt/1%2C3590%2CNAV47_STO67867_NLTAM%2C00.html
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Orr, Steve
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Grabowy, Chris
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: RE: Linux taking over at Oracle

2002-02-01 Thread Gogala, Mladen

There are rumors that Red Hat is buying Microsoft?

-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:16 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Steve,

As one of the GREAT MicroSlop bashers, I pray you are more than correct.

May the Penguin rule!!

BTW: I've experimented with Oracle 8  8i on Linux, RedHat's variant, 
I'll
agree it is stable, easy to use, and very supportable.  The problem is the
cost
of Oracle on a Linux box.  One reason I've been playing around with
PostGres.  I
can't say I like it as much, but you really can't beat the price tag.

DickG.

Reply Separator
Author: Orr; Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:   2/1/2002 7:55 AM

On a contrarian note with all the Larry hype aside... Linux is much more
that just a fad. In a relatively short time it has already put a very
significant dent in MS server software sales and I'm sure it's going to 
affect Sun/HP regardless of Oracle's IT infrastructure strategies. 
Linux/Intel is a proven production quality platform and having worked
with Linux/Oracle servers for over a year now I conclude that the Linux
revolution is not going away like just another fad. In fact, it's just
getting started. BTW, I'm getting ready to buy a ReplayTV unit and guess
what it runs on?  ... LINUX!!!

If you want to get a good idea of what folks are doing with Oracle on 
Linux just join the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list or go to
http://www.suse.com/en/support/oracle/index.html ... etc.

I think the point behind all this is that, large, complex servers can be
a support challenge with capacity planning for always on, 24x7, 
unlimited future scalability needs.

Rather than racking our brains we should be RAC'ing our servers.


Steve Orr,
Montana Revolutionary


-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 5:40 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


it's not just Oracle, this tends to be a trend in all businesses. Just
as there are fads in clothing (shorter hemlines, longer hemlines etc),
there seem to be fads in the right way to manage your computer
systems.

I've seen the cycle turn a number of times centralize all software and
systems, one data center to serve them all, standards cross-company
then suddenly it's decentralize, one big center makes no sense, we
don't get the things we need fast enough from them

--- Jonathan Gennick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Interesting news. Makes me wonder though. Remember when
 Oracle moved to support client-server computing? Now Larry
 derides client-server and distributed computing saying
 that it's cheaper to have just one big system. How many
 times have you heard Larry talk about how Oracle's
 consolidated their email servers? Makes me wonder whether
 five years down the road Larry will be telling us that it's
 silly to run a database on 50 cheap boxes because it's
 much easier to administer one big one.
 
 Best regards,
 
 Jonathan Gennick   
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * 906.387.1698
 http://Gennick.com * http://MichiganWaterfalls.com *
 http://ValleySpur.com
 
 Thursday, January 31, 2002, 2:36:21 PM, you wrote:
 AMG0 Ellison says Oracle's 'whole business' to run on Linux
 
 AMG0 The Oracle chairman and CEO said the company will replace three
 Unix
 AMG0 servers
 AMG0 that run the bulk of its business applications with a cluster
 of Intel
 AMG0 Corp.
 AMG0 servers running Linux.
 
 AMG0

http://computerworld.com/nlt/1%2C3590%2CNAV47_STO67867_NLTAM%2C00.html
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Orr, Steve
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Gogala, Mladen
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access 

RE: Linux taking over at Oracle

2002-02-01 Thread Orr, Steve

For a different perspective step into Larry's shoes for a minute, (O...
that's scary!)... Hmmm... the less they have to spend on servers the more
money left over to spend on me, er, my products... 

Oracle will get away with their pricing as long as the competition isn't so
stiff that they have to lower their prices to protect their base... but a
day of reckoning is coming. 

Not selling my Oracle stock... yet.



-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 9:15 AM
To: Orr, Steve; Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Steve,

As one of the GREAT MicroSlop bashers, I pray you are more than correct.

May the Penguin rule!!

BTW: I've experimented with Oracle 8  8i on Linux, RedHat's variant, 
I'll
agree it is stable, easy to use, and very supportable.  The problem is the
cost
of Oracle on a Linux box.  One reason I've been playing around with
PostGres.  I
can't say I like it as much, but you really can't beat the price tag.

DickG.

Reply Separator
Author: Orr; Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:   2/1/2002 7:55 AM

On a contrarian note with all the Larry hype aside... Linux is much more
that just a fad. In a relatively short time it has already put a very
significant dent in MS server software sales and I'm sure it's going to 
affect Sun/HP regardless of Oracle's IT infrastructure strategies. 
Linux/Intel is a proven production quality platform and having worked
with Linux/Oracle servers for over a year now I conclude that the Linux
revolution is not going away like just another fad. In fact, it's just
getting started. BTW, I'm getting ready to buy a ReplayTV unit and guess
what it runs on?  ... LINUX!!!

If you want to get a good idea of what folks are doing with Oracle on 
Linux just join the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list or go to
http://www.suse.com/en/support/oracle/index.html ... etc.

I think the point behind all this is that, large, complex servers can be
a support challenge with capacity planning for always on, 24x7, 
unlimited future scalability needs.

Rather than racking our brains we should be RAC'ing our servers.


Steve Orr,
Montana Revolutionary


-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 5:40 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


it's not just Oracle, this tends to be a trend in all businesses. Just
as there are fads in clothing (shorter hemlines, longer hemlines etc),
there seem to be fads in the right way to manage your computer
systems.

I've seen the cycle turn a number of times centralize all software and
systems, one data center to serve them all, standards cross-company
then suddenly it's decentralize, one big center makes no sense, we
don't get the things we need fast enough from them

--- Jonathan Gennick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Interesting news. Makes me wonder though. Remember when
 Oracle moved to support client-server computing? Now Larry
 derides client-server and distributed computing saying
 that it's cheaper to have just one big system. How many
 times have you heard Larry talk about how Oracle's
 consolidated their email servers? Makes me wonder whether
 five years down the road Larry will be telling us that it's
 silly to run a database on 50 cheap boxes because it's
 much easier to administer one big one.
 
 Best regards,
 
 Jonathan Gennick   
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * 906.387.1698
 http://Gennick.com * http://MichiganWaterfalls.com *
 http://ValleySpur.com
 
 Thursday, January 31, 2002, 2:36:21 PM, you wrote:
 AMG0 Ellison says Oracle's 'whole business' to run on Linux
 
 AMG0 The Oracle chairman and CEO said the company will replace three
 Unix
 AMG0 servers
 AMG0 that run the bulk of its business applications with a cluster
 of Intel
 AMG0 Corp.
 AMG0 servers running Linux.
 
 AMG0

http://computerworld.com/nlt/1%2C3590%2CNAV47_STO67867_NLTAM%2C00.html
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Orr, Steve
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Orr, Steve
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: 

RE: RE: Linux taking over at Oracle

2002-02-01 Thread Grabowy, Chris

It's not a rumor, it's true...MS is letting themselves become aquired by Red
Hat, they figure that all the lawsuits will have to be dropped, and there
going to put the Windows GUI onto RH Linux.  A killer combo.  

A brillant move by Bill Gates.

https://www.usatoday.com/current/0201/am/rhmspur.html

-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 12:50 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


There are rumors that Red Hat is buying Microsoft?

-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:16 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Steve,

As one of the GREAT MicroSlop bashers, I pray you are more than correct.

May the Penguin rule!!

BTW: I've experimented with Oracle 8  8i on Linux, RedHat's variant, 
I'll
agree it is stable, easy to use, and very supportable.  The problem is the
cost
of Oracle on a Linux box.  One reason I've been playing around with
PostGres.  I
can't say I like it as much, but you really can't beat the price tag.

DickG.

Reply Separator
Author: Orr; Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:   2/1/2002 7:55 AM

On a contrarian note with all the Larry hype aside... Linux is much more
that just a fad. In a relatively short time it has already put a very
significant dent in MS server software sales and I'm sure it's going to 
affect Sun/HP regardless of Oracle's IT infrastructure strategies. 
Linux/Intel is a proven production quality platform and having worked
with Linux/Oracle servers for over a year now I conclude that the Linux
revolution is not going away like just another fad. In fact, it's just
getting started. BTW, I'm getting ready to buy a ReplayTV unit and guess
what it runs on?  ... LINUX!!!

If you want to get a good idea of what folks are doing with Oracle on 
Linux just join the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list or go to
http://www.suse.com/en/support/oracle/index.html ... etc.

I think the point behind all this is that, large, complex servers can be
a support challenge with capacity planning for always on, 24x7, 
unlimited future scalability needs.

Rather than racking our brains we should be RAC'ing our servers.


Steve Orr,
Montana Revolutionary


-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 5:40 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


it's not just Oracle, this tends to be a trend in all businesses. Just
as there are fads in clothing (shorter hemlines, longer hemlines etc),
there seem to be fads in the right way to manage your computer
systems.

I've seen the cycle turn a number of times centralize all software and
systems, one data center to serve them all, standards cross-company
then suddenly it's decentralize, one big center makes no sense, we
don't get the things we need fast enough from them

--- Jonathan Gennick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Interesting news. Makes me wonder though. Remember when
 Oracle moved to support client-server computing? Now Larry
 derides client-server and distributed computing saying
 that it's cheaper to have just one big system. How many
 times have you heard Larry talk about how Oracle's
 consolidated their email servers? Makes me wonder whether
 five years down the road Larry will be telling us that it's
 silly to run a database on 50 cheap boxes because it's
 much easier to administer one big one.
 
 Best regards,
 
 Jonathan Gennick   
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * 906.387.1698
 http://Gennick.com * http://MichiganWaterfalls.com *
 http://ValleySpur.com
 
 Thursday, January 31, 2002, 2:36:21 PM, you wrote:
 AMG0 Ellison says Oracle's 'whole business' to run on Linux
 
 AMG0 The Oracle chairman and CEO said the company will replace three
 Unix
 AMG0 servers
 AMG0 that run the bulk of its business applications with a cluster
 of Intel
 AMG0 Corp.
 AMG0 servers running Linux.
 
 AMG0

http://computerworld.com/nlt/1%2C3590%2CNAV47_STO67867_NLTAM%2C00.html
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Orr, Steve
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, 

RE: Linux taking over at Oracle

2002-02-01 Thread Mercadante, Thomas F

Not selling my Oracle stock... yet.

now is the time to buy!  it's cheap!

Tom Mercadante
Oracle Certified Professional


-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 1:42 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


For a different perspective step into Larry's shoes for a minute, (O...
that's scary!)... Hmmm... the less they have to spend on servers the more
money left over to spend on me, er, my products... 

Oracle will get away with their pricing as long as the competition isn't so
stiff that they have to lower their prices to protect their base... but a
day of reckoning is coming. 

Not selling my Oracle stock... yet.



-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 9:15 AM
To: Orr, Steve; Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Steve,

As one of the GREAT MicroSlop bashers, I pray you are more than correct.

May the Penguin rule!!

BTW: I've experimented with Oracle 8  8i on Linux, RedHat's variant, 
I'll
agree it is stable, easy to use, and very supportable.  The problem is the
cost
of Oracle on a Linux box.  One reason I've been playing around with
PostGres.  I
can't say I like it as much, but you really can't beat the price tag.

DickG.

Reply Separator
Author: Orr; Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:   2/1/2002 7:55 AM

On a contrarian note with all the Larry hype aside... Linux is much more
that just a fad. In a relatively short time it has already put a very
significant dent in MS server software sales and I'm sure it's going to 
affect Sun/HP regardless of Oracle's IT infrastructure strategies. 
Linux/Intel is a proven production quality platform and having worked
with Linux/Oracle servers for over a year now I conclude that the Linux
revolution is not going away like just another fad. In fact, it's just
getting started. BTW, I'm getting ready to buy a ReplayTV unit and guess
what it runs on?  ... LINUX!!!

If you want to get a good idea of what folks are doing with Oracle on 
Linux just join the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list or go to
http://www.suse.com/en/support/oracle/index.html ... etc.

I think the point behind all this is that, large, complex servers can be
a support challenge with capacity planning for always on, 24x7, 
unlimited future scalability needs.

Rather than racking our brains we should be RAC'ing our servers.


Steve Orr,
Montana Revolutionary


-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 5:40 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


it's not just Oracle, this tends to be a trend in all businesses. Just
as there are fads in clothing (shorter hemlines, longer hemlines etc),
there seem to be fads in the right way to manage your computer
systems.

I've seen the cycle turn a number of times centralize all software and
systems, one data center to serve them all, standards cross-company
then suddenly it's decentralize, one big center makes no sense, we
don't get the things we need fast enough from them

--- Jonathan Gennick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Interesting news. Makes me wonder though. Remember when
 Oracle moved to support client-server computing? Now Larry
 derides client-server and distributed computing saying
 that it's cheaper to have just one big system. How many
 times have you heard Larry talk about how Oracle's
 consolidated their email servers? Makes me wonder whether
 five years down the road Larry will be telling us that it's
 silly to run a database on 50 cheap boxes because it's
 much easier to administer one big one.
 
 Best regards,
 
 Jonathan Gennick   
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * 906.387.1698
 http://Gennick.com * http://MichiganWaterfalls.com *
 http://ValleySpur.com
 
 Thursday, January 31, 2002, 2:36:21 PM, you wrote:
 AMG0 Ellison says Oracle's 'whole business' to run on Linux
 
 AMG0 The Oracle chairman and CEO said the company will replace three
 Unix
 AMG0 servers
 AMG0 that run the bulk of its business applications with a cluster
 of Intel
 AMG0 Corp.
 AMG0 servers running Linux.
 
 AMG0

http://computerworld.com/nlt/1%2C3590%2CNAV47_STO67867_NLTAM%2C00.html
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Orr, Steve
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Orr, Steve
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

  1   2   >