Re: Oracle Real Application Clusters

2002-10-24 Thread prem

Is it possible to download the ORAC software from some site, if so where from..?

Re: Oracle Real Application Clusters

2002-10-24 Thread Ray Stell
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 03:19:21PM -0800, Tim Gorman wrote:
 A couple of anecdotes to consider:
   a.. Some folks from the Oak Table forum (www.oaktable.net) recently (last July) 
constructed a 10-node cluster of Linux laptops right on the conference floor at 
Oracle Open World in Copenhagen, Denmark.  Information is available at 
http://investor.cnet.com/investor/news/newsitem/0-9900-1028-20212349-0.html?tag=ats.  
So it can definitely be done on the cheap! 


hmm...first time I've ever seen NetApp and cheap used together.  What is
the real poor man's shared disk architecture?  NFS?
===
Ray Stell   [EMAIL PROTECTED] (540) 231-4109 KE4TJC28^D
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Ray Stell
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Oracle Real Application Clusters

2002-10-24 Thread Jamadagni, Rajendra
Title: RE: Oracle Real Application Clusters





If I remember right we had some problems with gsd and nfs ...


Raj
__
Rajendra Jamadagni  MIS, ESPN Inc.
Rajendra dot Jamadagni at ESPN dot com
Any opinion expressed here is personal and doesn't reflect that of ESPN Inc. 
QOTD: Any clod can have facts, but having an opinion is an art!



-Original Message-
From: Ray Stell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 9:34 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: Re: Oracle Real Application Clusters



On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 03:19:21PM -0800, Tim Gorman wrote:
 A couple of anecdotes to consider:
 a.. Some folks from the Oak Table forum (www.oaktable.net) recently (last July) constructed a 10-node cluster of Linux laptops right on the conference floor at Oracle Open World in Copenhagen, Denmark. Information is available at http://investor.cnet.com/investor/news/newsitem/0-9900-1028-20212349-0.html?tag=ats. So it can definitely be done on the cheap! 


hmm...first time I've ever seen NetApp and cheap used together. What is
the real poor man's shared disk architecture? NFS?
===
Ray Stell [EMAIL PROTECTED] (540) 231-4109 KE4TJC 28^D
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Ray Stell
 INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



*This e-mail 
message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) above and may 
contain information that is privileged, attorney work product or exempt from 
disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this message in error, or are 
not the named recipient(s), please immediately notify corporate MIS at (860) 766-2000 
and delete this e-mail message from your computer, Thank 
you.*1



RE: Oracle Real Application Clusters

2002-10-24 Thread DENNIS WILLIAMS
Here are the papers I found. A word of caution: these are written by sales
critters so as a hard-core techie if you read more than 3 papers your head
will explode.
http://technet.oracle.com/deploy/availability/techlisting.html
http://technet.oracle.com/deploy/availability/techlisting.html 
 


Dennis Williams 
DBA, 40%OCP 
Lifetouch, Inc. 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 12:23 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L



Hi, 
Could you please give me the links to these white papers...? 



DENNIS WILLIAMS [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 


10/23/02 09:53 PM 
Please respond to ORACLE-L 



To:Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
cc: 
Subject:RE: Oracle Real Application Clusters



Tim - Gee, during the original presentation I attended, RAC was presented as
a cost-saving feature. Something about being able to use a lot of cheap
Linux servers. This stuck me as a little odd at the time. Just now, I looked
at the white papers that Oracle posts on the subject, and I didn't see the
cost-saving aspect mentioned. Or maybe Oracle is still getting the Linux
ball rolling.




Dennis Williams
DBA, 40%OCP
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 9:05 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Aye to that, but you'll need at least two, possibly three, identical
clusters, not just one.  One cluster for production and an identical cluster
for QA/Test, and possibly one for development (though that last is often
regarded as unnecessary).  Skimping on the QA/Test environment is the
leading edge of failure...

RAC itself requires additional DBA expertise as well as additional OS
SysAdmin expertise for cluster hardware/OS, each of which costs more to
obtain/maintain (either by hiring experienced/talented or training to build
or both).  Clustering is not a low-cost solution from any perspective...

RAC is a solution for certain specific high-availability and
high-scaleability requirements (not including data-center failure, a.k.a.
disaster-recovery), so it's a good idea to be certain that you are planning
a solution that meets your own specific requirements before proceeding.  RAC
should not be a high-level management decision -- it is a specific technical
solution to meet specific technical requirements, which themselves should
have been derived from the requirements of the business.  There are several
other possible H/A solutions in Oracle9i (i.e. physical standby, logical
standby, advanced replication, OS failover solutions, RAC, etc), each of
which addresses the same H/A problems in different ways with differing
levels of complexity and cost.

- Original Message -
To: Multiple  mailto:ORACLE-L;fatcity.com recipients of list ORACLE-L
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 6:43 AM

IMHO, the main requirement is that you have to have a system that needs to
be up 24x7 on a cluster and your ability to fork enough money to Oracle and
your server vendor (to get two identical machines) and your networking
vendor (for redundant network connections).

Rest everything is easy ...

Raj
__

Rajendra Jamadagni  MIS, ESPN Inc.

Rajendra dot Jamadagni at ESPN dot com

Any opinion expressed here is personal and doesn't reflect that of ESPN Inc.


QOTD: Any clod can have facts, but having an opinion is an art!

-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:04 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L



Dear All,

We are planning to implement ORAC for our application, can anybody tell me
where to get good information on the system requirements for implementing
the same.

Regards
Prem

--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: DENNIS WILLIAMS
 INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). 



-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: DENNIS WILLIAMS
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name

Re: Oracle Real Application Clusters

2002-10-24 Thread Tim Gorman
NetApp is NFS;  so are all current NAS products...

The phrases NetApp and cheap are *always* used together -- it is their
most compelling feature.  CFOs love NetApps.  For database usage however,
they are best used in non-demanding situations (i.e. low I/O volumes).  The
phrase filer is very apt -- their very best application is simple
file-serving; Windows network drive or UNIX file-system.  But not underneath
any I/O-intensive application such as a busy database-based application.
Any I/O subsystem (such as NAS) that relies on a cache for performance is
simply pure trouble for busy databases -- DEC knew it in the 80s and EMC
discovered it in the 90s.  Now NetApp knows in the 00s (does that rhyme?)...

- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 7:34 AM


 On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 03:19:21PM -0800, Tim Gorman wrote:
  A couple of anecdotes to consider:
a.. Some folks from the Oak Table forum (www.oaktable.net) recently
(last July) constructed a 10-node cluster of Linux laptops right on the
conference floor at Oracle Open World in Copenhagen, Denmark.  Information
is available at
http://investor.cnet.com/investor/news/newsitem/0-9900-1028-20212349-0.html?
tag=ats.  So it can definitely be done on the cheap!


 hmm...first time I've ever seen NetApp and cheap used together.  What is
 the real poor man's shared disk architecture?  NFS?
 ===
 Ray Stell   [EMAIL PROTECTED] (540) 231-4109 KE4TJC28^D
 --
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
 --
 Author: Ray Stell
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
 San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
 -
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Tim Gorman
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: Oracle Real Application Clusters

2002-10-24 Thread Ray Stell
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 05:43:38AM -0800, Jamadagni, Rajendra wrote:
 If I remember right we had some problems with gsd and nfs ...
 

could you elaborate?
===
Ray Stell   [EMAIL PROTECTED] (540) 231-4109 KE4TJC28^D
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Ray Stell
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: Oracle Real Application Clusters

2002-10-24 Thread Ray Stell
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 06:53:27AM -0800, Tim Gorman wrote:
 NetApp is NFS;  so are all current NAS products...
 
 The phrases NetApp and cheap are *always* used together -- it is their
 most compelling feature.  CFOs love NetApps.  For database usage however,


The netapp sales guy I talked with must have been trying to make his
quota for that quarter in one stop.  Their storage was off the charts
when I talked to them, but it has been awhile. 

So, for testing of rac I could just use nfs disks mounted r/w from 
multiple linux boxes?  I think I'll try it unless someone knows that
dog won't hunt.
===
Ray Stell   [EMAIL PROTECTED] (540) 231-4109 KE4TJC28^D
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Ray Stell
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Oracle Real Application Clusters

2002-10-24 Thread Jamadagni, Rajendra
Title: RE: Oracle Real Application Clusters





We had the user which owns oracle was nfs mounted across two machines using nfs. i.e. user oraclei home directory was nfs mounted across tow machines. When we used srvctl to start instances occasionally it used to hang when bringing up the 'other side'. Also when nfs had the problem, it would crash.

Our Unix guys fixed the problem (I don't know how) and ORacle is looking into the problem.
Raj
__
Rajendra Jamadagni  MIS, ESPN Inc.
Rajendra dot Jamadagni at ESPN dot com
Any opinion expressed here is personal and doesn't reflect that of ESPN Inc. 
QOTD: Any clod can have facts, but having an opinion is an art!



-Original Message-
From: Ray Stell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:39 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: Re: Oracle Real Application Clusters



On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 05:43:38AM -0800, Jamadagni, Rajendra wrote:
 If I remember right we had some problems with gsd and nfs ...
 


could you elaborate?
===
Ray Stell [EMAIL PROTECTED] (540) 231-4109 KE4TJC 28^D



This e-mail 
message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) above and may 
contain information that is privileged, attorney work product or exempt from 
disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this message in error, or are 
not the named recipient(s), please immediately notify corporate MIS at (860) 766-2000 
and delete this e-mail message from your computer, Thank 
you.*2



RE: Oracle Real Application Clusters

2002-10-23 Thread Jamadagni, Rajendra



IMHO, the main requirement is that you have to have a systemthat 
needs to be up 24x7 on a cluster and your ability to fork enough money to Oracle 
and your server vendor (to get two identical machines) and your networking 
vendor (for redundant network connections).

Rest everything is easy ...

Raj
__
Rajendra 
Jamadagni 
 MIS, ESPN Inc.
Rajendra dot Jamadagni at ESPN dot 
com
Any opinion expressed here is 
personal and doesn't reflect that of ESPN Inc. 
QOTD: Any clod can have facts, but 
having an opinion is an art!

  -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:04 
  AMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: 
  Oracle Real Application ClustersDear All, We are planning 
  to implement ORAC for our application, can anybody tell me where to get good 
  information on the system requirements for implementing the same. 
  Regards Prem
*This e-mail 
message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) above and may 
contain information that is privileged, attorney work product or exempt from 
disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this message in error, or are 
not the named recipient(s), please immediately notify corporate MIS at (860) 766-2000 
and delete this e-mail message from your computer, Thank 
you.*1



Re: Oracle Real Application Clusters

2002-10-23 Thread Tim Gorman



Aye to that, but you'll need at least two, possibly 
three, identical clusters, not just one. One clusterfor production 
and an identicalcluster for QA/Test, and possibly one for development 
(though that last is often regarded as unnecessary). Skimping on the 
QA/Test environment is the leading edge offailure...

RAC itself requires additional DBA expertise as 
well as additional OS SysAdmin expertise for cluster hardware/OS, each of which 
costs moreto obtain/maintain (either by hiring experienced/talented or 
training to build or both).Clustering is not a low-cost solution 
from any perspective...

RAC is a solution for certain specific 
high-availability andhigh-scaleabilityrequirements (not including 
"data-center failure",a.k.a. disaster-recovery), so it's a good idea to be 
certain that you are planning a solution that meets your own specific 
requirements before proceeding. RACshould not be a high-level 
management decision -- it is a specific technical solution to meet specific 
technical requirements, which themselves should have been derived from the 
requirements of the business. There areseveral other possible H/A 
solutions in Oracle9i (i.e. physical standby, logical standby, advanced 
replication, OS failover solutions, RAC, etc), each of which addresses the same 
H/A problems in different ways with differing levels of complexity and 
cost.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Jamadagni, Rajendra 
  To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L 
  
  Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 6:43 
  AM
  Subject: RE: Oracle Real Application 
  Clusters
  
  IMHO, the main requirement is that you have to have a systemthat 
  needs to be up 24x7 on a cluster and your ability to fork enough money to 
  Oracle and your server vendor (to get two identical machines) and your 
  networking vendor (for redundant network connections).
  
  Rest everything is easy ...
  
  Raj
  __
  Rajendra 
  Jamadagni 
   MIS, ESPN Inc.
  Rajendra dot Jamadagni at ESPN 
  dot com
  Any opinion expressed here is 
  personal and doesn't reflect that of ESPN Inc. 
  QOTD: Any clod can have facts, 
  but having an opinion is an 
  art!
  
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:04 
AMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: 
Oracle Real Application ClustersDear All, We are planning to implement ORAC for our application, can anybody 
tell me where to get good information on the system requirements for 
implementing the same. Regards Prem


RE: Oracle Real Application Clusters

2002-10-23 Thread Jamadagni, Rajendra



You are right Tim (now you may ask "what's new in 
that?")

We have a production cluster, development cluster and (possible a standby 
cluster) all identical.

Raj
__
Rajendra 
Jamadagni 
 MIS, ESPN Inc.
Rajendra dot Jamadagni at ESPN dot 
com
Any opinion expressed here is 
personal and doesn't reflect that of ESPN Inc. 
QOTD: Any clod can have facts, but 
having an opinion is an art!

  -Original Message-From: Tim Gorman 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 10:05 
  AMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: Re: 
  Oracle Real Application Clusters
  Aye to that, but you'll need at least two, 
  possibly three, identical clusters, not just one. One clusterfor 
  production and an identicalcluster for QA/Test, and possibly one for 
  development (though that last is often regarded as unnecessary). 
  Skimping on the QA/Test environment is the leading edge 
  offailure...
  
  RAC itself requires additional DBA expertise as 
  well as additional OS SysAdmin expertise for cluster hardware/OS, each of 
  which costs moreto obtain/maintain (either by hiring 
  experienced/talented or training to build or both).Clustering is 
  not a low-cost solution from any perspective...
  
  RAC is a solution for certain specific 
  high-availability andhigh-scaleabilityrequirements (not including 
  "data-center failure",a.k.a. disaster-recovery), so it's a good idea to 
  be certain that you are planning a solution that meets your own specific 
  requirements before proceeding. RACshould not be a high-level 
  management decision -- it is a specific technical solution to meet specific 
  technical requirements, which themselves should have been derived from the 
  requirements of the business. There areseveral other possible H/A 
  solutions in Oracle9i (i.e. physical standby, logical standby, advanced 
  replication, OS failover solutions, RAC, etc), each of which addresses the 
  same H/A problems in different ways with differing levels of complexity and 
  cost.
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Jamadagni, Rajendra 
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L 

Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 6:43 
    AM
    Subject: RE: Oracle Real Application 
Clusters

IMHO, the main requirement is that you have to have a 
systemthat needs to be up 24x7 on a cluster and your ability to fork 
enough money to Oracle and your server vendor (to get two identical 
machines) and your networking vendor (for redundant network 
connections).

Rest everything is easy ...

Raj
__
Rajendra 
Jamadagni 
 MIS, ESPN Inc.
Rajendra dot Jamadagni at ESPN 
dot com
Any opinion expressed here is 
personal and doesn't reflect that of ESPN Inc. 
QOTD: Any clod can have facts, 
but having an opinion is an 
art!

  -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:04 
  AMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: 
  Oracle Real Application ClustersDear All, We are planning to implement ORAC for our application, can anybody 
  tell me where to get good information on the system requirements for 
  implementing the same. Regards Prem
This e-mail 
message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) above and may 
contain information that is privileged, attorney work product or exempt from 
disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this message in error, or are 
not the named recipient(s), please immediately notify corporate MIS at (860) 766-2000 
and delete this e-mail message from your computer, Thank 
you.*2



RE: Oracle Real Application Clusters

2002-10-23 Thread Loughmiller, Greg
We are performing a rather detailed POC of RAC within a SUN environment...
Be glad to share some details once we complete this to those
interestedI'm hoping for a detailed document with detailed use
cases... But that does assume those who are in the separate areas will
accomplish that as desired...
 
thanks
greg

-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 10:05 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Aye to that, but you'll need at least two, possibly three, identical
clusters, not just one.  One cluster for production and an identical cluster
for QA/Test, and possibly one for development (though that last is often
regarded as unnecessary).  Skimping on the QA/Test environment is the
leading edge of failure...
 
RAC itself requires additional DBA expertise as well as additional OS
SysAdmin expertise for cluster hardware/OS, each of which costs more to
obtain/maintain (either by hiring experienced/talented or training to build
or both).  Clustering is not a low-cost solution from any perspective...
 
RAC is a solution for certain specific high-availability and
high-scaleability requirements (not including data-center failure, a.k.a.
disaster-recovery), so it's a good idea to be certain that you are planning
a solution that meets your own specific requirements before proceeding.  RAC
should not be a high-level management decision -- it is a specific technical
solution to meet specific technical requirements, which themselves should
have been derived from the requirements of the business.  There are several
other possible H/A solutions in Oracle9i (i.e. physical standby, logical
standby, advanced replication, OS failover solutions, RAC, etc), each of
which addresses the same H/A problems in different ways with differing
levels of complexity and cost.

- Original Message - 
To: Multiple  mailto:ORACLE-L;fatcity.com recipients of list ORACLE-L 
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 6:43 AM

IMHO, the main requirement is that you have to have a system that needs to
be up 24x7 on a cluster and your ability to fork enough money to Oracle and
your server vendor (to get two identical machines) and your networking
vendor (for redundant network connections).
 
Rest everything is easy ...
 
Raj
__

Rajendra Jamadagni  MIS, ESPN Inc.

Rajendra dot Jamadagni at ESPN dot com

Any opinion expressed here is personal and doesn't reflect that of ESPN Inc.


QOTD: Any clod can have facts, but having an opinion is an art!

-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:04 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L



Dear All, 

We are planning to implement ORAC for our application, can anybody tell me
where to get good information on the system requirements for implementing
the same. 

Regards 
Prem

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Loughmiller, Greg
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Oracle Real Application Clusters

2002-10-23 Thread DENNIS WILLIAMS
Tim - Gee, during the original presentation I attended, RAC was presented as
a cost-saving feature. Something about being able to use a lot of cheap
Linux servers. This stuck me as a little odd at the time. Just now, I looked
at the white papers that Oracle posts on the subject, and I didn't see the
cost-saving aspect mentioned. Or maybe Oracle is still getting the Linux
ball rolling.
 



Dennis Williams 
DBA, 40%OCP 
Lifetouch, Inc. 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 9:05 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Aye to that, but you'll need at least two, possibly three, identical
clusters, not just one.  One cluster for production and an identical cluster
for QA/Test, and possibly one for development (though that last is often
regarded as unnecessary).  Skimping on the QA/Test environment is the
leading edge of failure...
 
RAC itself requires additional DBA expertise as well as additional OS
SysAdmin expertise for cluster hardware/OS, each of which costs more to
obtain/maintain (either by hiring experienced/talented or training to build
or both).  Clustering is not a low-cost solution from any perspective...
 
RAC is a solution for certain specific high-availability and
high-scaleability requirements (not including data-center failure, a.k.a.
disaster-recovery), so it's a good idea to be certain that you are planning
a solution that meets your own specific requirements before proceeding.  RAC
should not be a high-level management decision -- it is a specific technical
solution to meet specific technical requirements, which themselves should
have been derived from the requirements of the business.  There are several
other possible H/A solutions in Oracle9i (i.e. physical standby, logical
standby, advanced replication, OS failover solutions, RAC, etc), each of
which addresses the same H/A problems in different ways with differing
levels of complexity and cost.

- Original Message - 
To: Multiple  mailto:ORACLE-L;fatcity.com recipients of list ORACLE-L 
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 6:43 AM

IMHO, the main requirement is that you have to have a system that needs to
be up 24x7 on a cluster and your ability to fork enough money to Oracle and
your server vendor (to get two identical machines) and your networking
vendor (for redundant network connections).
 
Rest everything is easy ...
 
Raj
__

Rajendra Jamadagni  MIS, ESPN Inc.

Rajendra dot Jamadagni at ESPN dot com

Any opinion expressed here is personal and doesn't reflect that of ESPN Inc.


QOTD: Any clod can have facts, but having an opinion is an art!

-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:04 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L



Dear All, 

We are planning to implement ORAC for our application, can anybody tell me
where to get good information on the system requirements for implementing
the same. 

Regards 
Prem

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: DENNIS WILLIAMS
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: Oracle Real Application Clusters

2002-10-23 Thread Tim Gorman



A couple of anecdotes to consider:

  Some folks from the "Oak Table" forum (www.oaktable.net)recently(last 
  July)constructed a 10-node cluster of Linux laptops right on the 
  conference floor at Oracle Open World in Copenhagen, Denmark. 
  Information is available at http://investor.cnet.com/investor/news/newsitem/0-9900-1028-20212349-0.html?tag=ats. 
  So it can definitely be done on the cheap! 
  Some years ago (1994-96), I worked extensively on 
  Oracle7 Parallel Server on IBM RS6000 SP environments. One of IBM's 
  originally-statedintents with the RS6000 SP product line was to create 
  "mainframe-class machines" using "low-cost, off-the-shelf RS6000 
  components". After a couple years of hard knocks and severely 
  disappointed, deeply frustrated customers, IBM admitted (to their most 
  iratecustomers) that the strategy of using off-the-shelf, less-robust 
  components with the goal of high-availability does not work. The 
  components themselves have to be "hardened" additionally, hardware and 
  software,adding to the cost and slowing the release 
cycle.
So, it can definitely be done. It can even be 
done cheap. But it's going to cost, later if not sooner...

- Original Message - 
From: "DENNIS WILLIAMS" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L" 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 10:23 
AM
Subject: RE: Oracle Real Application 
Clusters
 Tim - Gee, during the original presentation I attended, RAC was 
presented as a cost-saving feature. Something about being able to use a 
lot of cheap Linux servers. This stuck me as a little odd at the time. 
Just now, I looked at the white papers that Oracle posts on the subject, 
and I didn't see the cost-saving aspect mentioned. Or maybe Oracle is 
still getting the Linux ball rolling.   
  Dennis Williams  DBA, 40%OCP  Lifetouch, Inc. 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
 -Original Message- Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 
9:05 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L  
 Aye to that, but you'll need at least two, possibly three, 
identical clusters, not just one. One cluster for production and 
an identical cluster for QA/Test, and possibly one for development 
(though that last is often regarded as unnecessary). Skimping on 
the QA/Test environment is the leading edge of failure... 
 RAC itself requires additional DBA expertise as well as 
additional OS SysAdmin expertise for cluster hardware/OS, each of which 
costs more to obtain/maintain (either by hiring experienced/talented or 
training to build or both). Clustering is not a low-cost solution 
from any perspective...  RAC is a solution for certain 
specific high-availability and high-scaleability requirements (not 
including "data-center failure", a.k.a. disaster-recovery), so it's a 
good idea to be certain that you are planning a solution that meets your 
own specific requirements before proceeding. RAC should not be a 
high-level management decision -- it is a specific technical solution to 
meet specific technical requirements, which themselves should have been 
derived from the requirements of the business. There are several 
other possible H/A solutions in Oracle9i (i.e. physical standby, logical 
standby, advanced replication, OS failover solutions, RAC, etc), each of 
which addresses the same H/A problems in different ways with differing 
levels of complexity and cost.  - Original Message - 
 To: Multiple mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
recipients of list ORACLE-L  Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 6:43 
AM  IMHO, the main requirement is that you have to have a system 
that needs to be up 24x7 on a cluster and your ability to fork enough 
money to Oracle and your server vendor (to get two identical machines) 
and your networking vendor (for redundant network connections). 
 Rest everything is easy ...  Raj 
__  Rajendra 
Jamadagni 
MIS, ESPN Inc.  Rajendra dot Jamadagni at ESPN dot com 
 Any opinion expressed here is personal and doesn't reflect that of ESPN 
Inc.   QOTD: Any clod can have facts, but having an 
opinion is an art!  -Original Message- Sent: 
Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:04 AM To: Multiple recipients of list 
ORACLE-LDear All,   We are 
planning to implement ORAC for our application, can anybody tell me 
where to get good information on the system requirements for 
implementing the same.   Regards  Prem 
 --  Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- 
 Author: DENNIS WILLIAMS  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San 
Diego, California -- Mailing list and 
web hosting services 
- To 
REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT 
spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line 
containin

RE: Oracle Real Application Clusters

2002-10-23 Thread prem

Hi,
Could you please give me the links to these white papers...?






DENNIS WILLIAMS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10/23/02 09:53 PM
Please respond to ORACLE-L


To:Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:RE: Oracle Real Application Clusters


Tim - Gee, during the original presentation I attended, RAC was presented as
a cost-saving feature. Something about being able to use a lot of cheap
Linux servers. This stuck me as a little odd at the time. Just now, I looked
at the white papers that Oracle posts on the subject, and I didn't see the
cost-saving aspect mentioned. Or maybe Oracle is still getting the Linux
ball rolling.




Dennis Williams
DBA, 40%OCP
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 9:05 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Aye to that, but you'll need at least two, possibly three, identical
clusters, not just one. One cluster for production and an identical cluster
for QA/Test, and possibly one for development (though that last is often
regarded as unnecessary). Skimping on the QA/Test environment is the
leading edge of failure...

RAC itself requires additional DBA expertise as well as additional OS
SysAdmin expertise for cluster hardware/OS, each of which costs more to
obtain/maintain (either by hiring experienced/talented or training to build
or both). Clustering is not a low-cost solution from any perspective...

RAC is a solution for certain specific high-availability and
high-scaleability requirements (not including data-center failure, a.k.a.
disaster-recovery), so it's a good idea to be certain that you are planning
a solution that meets your own specific requirements before proceeding. RAC
should not be a high-level management decision -- it is a specific technical
solution to meet specific technical requirements, which themselves should
have been derived from the requirements of the business. There are several
other possible H/A solutions in Oracle9i (i.e. physical standby, logical
standby, advanced replication, OS failover solutions, RAC, etc), each of
which addresses the same H/A problems in different ways with differing
levels of complexity and cost.

- Original Message -
To: Multiple mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] recipients of list ORACLE-L
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 6:43 AM

IMHO, the main requirement is that you have to have a system that needs to
be up 24x7 on a cluster and your ability to fork enough money to Oracle and
your server vendor (to get two identical machines) and your networking
vendor (for redundant network connections).

Rest everything is easy ...

Raj
__

Rajendra Jamadagni   MIS, ESPN Inc.

Rajendra dot Jamadagni at ESPN dot com

Any opinion expressed here is personal and doesn't reflect that of ESPN Inc.


QOTD: Any clod can have facts, but having an opinion is an art!

-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:04 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L



Dear All,

We are planning to implement ORAC for our application, can anybody tell me
where to get good information on the system requirements for implementing
the same.

Regards
Prem

--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: DENNIS WILLIAMS
 INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services  -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).