RE: Oracle Vs DB2

2003-03-25 Thread Pradip_Biswas



Oracle 
has some internal site for "competetive" info. You can browse the oracle site www.oracle.com to start with. You can also 
contact oracle "Sales" Consultants if know your Oracle Account Manager ( Sales 
Rep). www.oracle.com may also have some 
contact info ( for example some Telesales contacts) who would love the "lead", 
given by you.

Thanks and Best 
Regards, -Original 
Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 3:15 
AMTo: Multiple recipients of list OR[Biswas, 
Pradip]ACLE-LSubject: Oracle Vs 
DB2
Dear All, 
  Strange as it seems, my client has asked 
  me to compare Oracle with DB2 with regard to all the DB functional aspects. They are more inclined towards DB2 
  and we have the application built on Oracle. We are in for a one-to-one comparison based on the features that we 
  already have in Oracle and that are in 
  use in our application. For eg, function based indexes, table clustering, RAC, 
  partitioning (of all kinds - 
  list,range,hash), External tables, to name a few. I would really appreciate if anyone can throw some 
  light into this. Links to any sites would also be helpful. We dont have much time for this activity, so 
  please help us. I havent worked in DB2 as well which is the biggest bottleneck that I 
  face.Best RegardsJai


Re: Oracle Vs DB2

2003-03-25 Thread Daniel Wisser
hi!

db2 sites which i can strongly recommend are

http://www-3.ibm.com/cgi-bin/db2www/data/db2/udb/winos2unix/support/v7pubs.d2w/en_main

and

http://www-3.ibm.com/software/data/db2/os390/v7books.html

i guess you will have a close look at V7 and V8, but V5 and V6
are also there and even V4 for MVS.

daniel
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Daniel Wisser
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: Oracle vs. DB2

2002-08-13 Thread Alexandre Gorbatchev

Mike,

Here is pro-IBM :) report:
http://www-3.ibm.com/software/data/pubs/papers/orac91vsdb272/orac91vsdb272.p
df

Alexandre

 Hi Everyone!

 Well, there's been a lot of Oracle vs. Microsoft traffic on the
 list, but now my Manglement wants a similar comparison to IBM's
 DB2.

 Does anyone know of web sites or locations where there are
 documented objective comparisons between Oracle and DB2?  I'm
 faced with answering buzzwords like 'Future Market Position',
 'T.C.O. - Cost Effectiveness', 'Demonstrated Technology', and
 'Platform Compatibility'.

 Any references are appreciated.

 Thanks,
 Mike

 ---

===
 Michael P. Vergara
 Oracle DBA
 Guidant Corporation

 --
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
 --
 Author: Vergara, Michael (TEM)
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
 San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
 
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Alexandre Gorbatchev
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Oracle vs. DB2

2002-08-13 Thread DENNIS WILLIAMS

Mike
eWeek did a head-to-head comparison among the leading databases,
including Oracle and DB2. Oracle kicked butt.

http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,293,00.asp

In searching, I found an interesting site that provides links to all sorts
of database comparisons.
http://www.itsystems.lv/gints/compare_db.htm

Dennis Williams
DBA
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 5:38 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Hi Everyone!

Well, there's been a lot of Oracle vs. Microsoft traffic on the
list, but now my Manglement wants a similar comparison to IBM's
DB2.

Does anyone know of web sites or locations where there are
documented objective comparisons between Oracle and DB2?  I'm
faced with answering buzzwords like 'Future Market Position', 
'T.C.O. - Cost Effectiveness', 'Demonstrated Technology', and
'Platform Compatibility'.

Any references are appreciated.

Thanks,
Mike

---
===
Michael P. Vergara
Oracle DBA
Guidant Corporation

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Vergara, Michael (TEM)
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: DENNIS WILLIAMS
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: Oracle vs. DB2

2002-08-13 Thread Steven Lembark



One thing that seems different to me: DBA's at the sites
we work in with DB2 seem to swear by it more than at it.
This is the reverse ratio I find at Oracle houses.

--
Steven Lembark   2930 W. Palmer
Workhorse Computing   Chicago, IL 60647
+1 800 762 1582
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Steven Lembark
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: Oracle vs. DB2

2002-08-13 Thread ltiu

People like to work(and are more effective) in an environment they are
comfortable with, may it be Cobol Mainframe, RPG AS/400, MS SQL Server, MySQL,
Oracle or Sybase.

The point here is not which one is the best database, but which combination of
database and people(talent/skill) can give you the best return on investment.

Pointless having to use DB2 if your people don't know anything about DB2 - even
if DB2 is the best, you still can't get it off the ground if you do not have the
poeple to work it. Same goes for the other databases.

If you need to evaluate which is the best database, evaluate it based on which
is the best database for you (databse and people included).

Even MS Access can fly to the moon if you have good people working it.

ltiu

Quoting Steven Lembark [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 
 
 One thing that seems different to me: DBA's at the sites
 we work in with DB2 seem to swear by it more than at it.
 This is the reverse ratio I find at Oracle houses.
 
 --
 Steven Lembark   2930 W. Palmer
 Workhorse Computing   Chicago, IL 60647
 +1 800 762 1582
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
 -- 
 Author: Steven Lembark
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
 San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
 
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
 




-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: ltiu
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: Oracle vs. DB2

2002-08-13 Thread Igor Neyman

 Even MS Access can fly to the moon if you have good people working it.


I wouldn't bet my money on that :-)

Igor Neyman, OCP DBA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 12:08 PM


 People like to work(and are more effective) in an environment they are
 comfortable with, may it be Cobol Mainframe, RPG AS/400, MS SQL Server,
MySQL,
 Oracle or Sybase.

 The point here is not which one is the best database, but which
combination of
 database and people(talent/skill) can give you the best return on
investment.

 Pointless having to use DB2 if your people don't know anything about DB2 -
even
 if DB2 is the best, you still can't get it off the ground if you do not
have the
 poeple to work it. Same goes for the other databases.

 If you need to evaluate which is the best database, evaluate it based on
which
 is the best database for you (databse and people included).

 Even MS Access can fly to the moon if you have good people working it.

 ltiu

 Quoting Steven Lembark [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 
 
  One thing that seems different to me: DBA's at the sites
  we work in with DB2 seem to swear by it more than at it.
  This is the reverse ratio I find at Oracle houses.
 
  --
  Steven Lembark   2930 W. Palmer
  Workhorse Computing   Chicago, IL 60647
  +1 800 762 1582
  --
  Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
  --
  Author: Steven Lembark
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
  San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
  
  To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
  to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
  the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
  (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
  also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
 




 --
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
 --
 Author: ltiu
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
 San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
 
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Igor Neyman
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: Oracle vs. DB2

2002-08-13 Thread ltiu

But then this is an Oracle email list. What do you know, Oracle is da Best!!

Quoting Igor Neyman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

  Even MS Access can fly to the moon if you have good people working it.
 
 
 I wouldn't bet my money on that :-)
 
 Igor Neyman, OCP DBA
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 - Original Message -
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 12:08 PM
 
 
  People like to work(and are more effective) in an environment they are
  comfortable with, may it be Cobol Mainframe, RPG AS/400, MS SQL Server,
 MySQL,
  Oracle or Sybase.
 
  The point here is not which one is the best database, but which
 combination of
  database and people(talent/skill) can give you the best return on
 investment.
 
  Pointless having to use DB2 if your people don't know anything about DB2
 -
 even
  if DB2 is the best, you still can't get it off the ground if you do not
 have the
  poeple to work it. Same goes for the other databases.
 
  If you need to evaluate which is the best database, evaluate it based on
 which
  is the best database for you (databse and people included).
 
  Even MS Access can fly to the moon if you have good people working it.
 
  ltiu
 
  Quoting Steven Lembark [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 
  
  
   One thing that seems different to me: DBA's at the sites
   we work in with DB2 seem to swear by it more than at it.
   This is the reverse ratio I find at Oracle houses.
  
   --
   Steven Lembark   2930 W. Palmer
   Workhorse Computing   Chicago, IL 60647
   +1 800 762 1582
   --
   Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
   --
   Author: Steven Lembark
 INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
   Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
   San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
   
   To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
   to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
   the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
   (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
   also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
  
 
 
 
 
  --
  Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
  --
  Author: ltiu
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
  San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
  
  To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
  to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
  the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
  (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
  also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
 
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
 -- 
 Author: Igor Neyman
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
 San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
 
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
 




-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: ltiu
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: Oracle vs. DB2

2002-08-13 Thread Igor Neyman

Don't take it so personal.

I agree, unskilled people can bring Oracle down to Access level.
But, there is no such skill, which can make Access perform at Oracle level
:-)

Igor Neyman, OCP DBA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 1:13 PM


 But then this is an Oracle email list. What do you know, Oracle is da
Best!!

 Quoting Igor Neyman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

   Even MS Access can fly to the moon if you have good people working it.
  
 
  I wouldn't bet my money on that :-)
 
  Igor Neyman, OCP DBA
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
  - Original Message -
  To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 12:08 PM
 
 
   People like to work(and are more effective) in an environment they are
   comfortable with, may it be Cobol Mainframe, RPG AS/400, MS SQL
Server,
  MySQL,
   Oracle or Sybase.
  
   The point here is not which one is the best database, but which
  combination of
   database and people(talent/skill) can give you the best return on
  investment.
  
   Pointless having to use DB2 if your people don't know anything about
DB2
  -
  even
   if DB2 is the best, you still can't get it off the ground if you do
not
  have the
   poeple to work it. Same goes for the other databases.
  
   If you need to evaluate which is the best database, evaluate it based
on
  which
   is the best database for you (databse and people included).
  
   Even MS Access can fly to the moon if you have good people working it.
  
   ltiu
  
   Quoting Steven Lembark [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
  
   
   
One thing that seems different to me: DBA's at the sites
we work in with DB2 seem to swear by it more than at it.
This is the reverse ratio I find at Oracle houses.
   
--
Steven Lembark   2930 W. Palmer
Workhorse Computing   Chicago, IL 60647
+1 800 762 1582
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Steven Lembark
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing
Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
   
  
  
  
  
   --
   Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
   --
   Author: ltiu
 INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
   Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
   San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
   
   To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
   to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
   the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
   (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
   also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
 
  --
  Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
  --
  Author: Igor Neyman
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
  San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
  
  To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
  to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
  the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
  (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
  also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
 




 --
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
 --
 Author: ltiu
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
 San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
 
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Igor Neyman
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public 

RE: Oracle vs. DB2

2002-08-13 Thread Jesse, Rich

OK, I can take the subjectiveness of My DB is better than your DB, but
this statement is nothing short of a marketing lie.

Rich Jesse   System/Database Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Quad/Tech International, Sussex, WI USA

 -Original Message-
 From: ltiu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 11:08 AM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 Subject: Re: Oracle vs. DB2

 ...
 Even MS Access can fly to the moon if you have good people working it.
 ...
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Jesse, Rich
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: Oracle vs. DB2

2002-08-12 Thread paquette stephane

For what I've read, globally the 2 databases are equal
in performance, reliability and functionnalities.
Larryh E as many times said that it's only competition
in the database market is DB2.

I guess it really depends on your environment.

Of course Oracle works on more OS (used to be anyway),
but which big organisation only have one DB ? All big
companies I've worked have many DB.

I would be interested by any non-partial comparison
between Oracle and DB2.


 --- Vergara, Michael (TEM) [EMAIL PROTECTED] a
écrit :  Hi Everyone!
 
 Well, there's been a lot of Oracle vs. Microsoft
 traffic on the
 list, but now my Manglement wants a similar
 comparison to IBM's
 DB2.
 
 Does anyone know of web sites or locations where
 there are
 documented objective comparisons between Oracle and
 DB2?  I'm
 faced with answering buzzwords like 'Future Market
 Position', 
 'T.C.O. - Cost Effectiveness', 'Demonstrated
 Technology', and
 'Platform Compatibility'.
 
 Any references are appreciated.
 
 Thanks,
 Mike
 
 ---

===
 Michael P. Vergara
 Oracle DBA
 Guidant Corporation
 
 --
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ:
 http://www.orafaq.com
 --
 Author: Vergara, Michael (TEM)
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX:
 (858) 538-5051
 San Diego, California-- Public Internet
 access / Mailing Lists


 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an
 E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of
 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB
 ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed
 from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information
 (like subscribing). 

=
Stéphane Paquette
DBA Oracle, consultant entrepôt de données
Oracle DBA, datawarehouse consultant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français !
Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: =?iso-8859-1?q?paquette=20stephane?=
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: Oracle vs. DB2

2002-08-12 Thread lembark



-- Vergara, Michael (TEM) [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 08/12/02 14:38:19 -0800

 Hi Everyone!
 
 Well, there's been a lot of Oracle vs. Microsoft traffic on the
 list, but now my Manglement wants a similar comparison to IBM's
 DB2.
 
 Does anyone know of web sites or locations where there are
 documented objective comparisons between Oracle and DB2?  I'm
 faced with answering buzzwords like 'Future Market Position', 
 'T.C.O. - Cost Effectiveness', 'Demonstrated Technology', and
 'Platform Compatibility'.

www.ibm.com

--
Steven Lembark  2930 W. Palmer
Workhorse Computing  Chicago, IL 60647
   +1 800 762 1582
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: Oracle VS. DB2

2001-08-29 Thread Eric D. Pierce

is that part of Larry's reducing complexity thangy?


[via: ORACLE-L Digest -- Volume 2001, Number 241]

 
 --
 
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 13:41:03 -0400
  Subject: Oracle VS. DB2
 
 Any comment on the following:
 
 IBM enlists ISVs in war against Oracle
 
 Strategic alliances with independent software vendors have helped IBM gain
 new customers for its DB2 database software. IBM also appears to be
 getting help from an unlikely source: Oracle Corp.
 
 http://computerworld.com/nlt/1%2C3590%2CNAV47_STO63350_NLTAM%2C00.html
 
 Personally, I believe they've hit the nail straight on the head.


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Eric D. Pierce
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Oracle VS. DB2

2001-08-28 Thread Grabowy, Chris

Time will tell.  But it appears that Larry burned quite a few bridges in the
past few months.  Those third party Oracle apps(SAP, Peoplesoft, etc) were
bringing in easy money for Oracle.  Building up the applications side of
Oracle is a good thing, but you dont jump up on the highest pedstal, beat
your chest and insult your, direct or in-direct, partners...like I said,
time will tell.

-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 2:45 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Any comment on the following:

IBM enlists ISVs in war against Oracle

Strategic alliances with independent software vendors have helped IBM gain
new
customers for its DB2 database software. IBM also appears to be getting help
from an unlikely source: Oracle Corp.

http://computerworld.com/nlt/1%2C3590%2CNAV47_STO63350_NLTAM%2C00.html

Personally, I believe they've hit the nail straight on the head.

Dick Goulet
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Grabowy, Chris
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Oracle VS. DB2

2001-08-28 Thread Henry Poras

It seems like this is a problem which would naturally arise from selling
both databases and applications and is accentuated by Ellison's ego.

Henry
-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 2:45 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Any comment on the following:

IBM enlists ISVs in war against Oracle

Strategic alliances with independent software vendors have helped IBM gain
new
customers for its DB2 database software. IBM also appears to be getting help
from an unlikely source: Oracle Corp.

http://computerworld.com/nlt/1%2C3590%2CNAV47_STO63350_NLTAM%2C00.html

Personally, I believe they've hit the nail straight on the head.

Dick Goulet
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Henry Poras
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Oracle VS. DB2

2001-08-28 Thread Weaver, Walt

Yup. Seems to me the worst thing that has happened to Oracle is when Ray
Lane quit. Now Larry is a loose cannon.

--Walt Weaver
  Bozeman, Montana

-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 1:27 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Time will tell.  But it appears that Larry burned quite a few bridges in the
past few months.  Those third party Oracle apps(SAP, Peoplesoft, etc) were
bringing in easy money for Oracle.  Building up the applications side of
Oracle is a good thing, but you dont jump up on the highest pedstal, beat
your chest and insult your, direct or in-direct, partners...like I said,
time will tell.

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Weaver, Walt
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Oracle VS. DB2

2001-08-28 Thread Grabowy, Chris

Errr...well, I read an article about Larry and Oracle from some business
magazine.  Basically, Larry was in a sailboat race, and had a near death
experience.  So when he came back, he decided to live life to the fullest.
He started stripping power from execs, wanting to make the call on
everything at the company.  So with Larry making all the calls, what is the
point in Ray staying?  Now where did I put those SQL Server manuals?!?!?!?!

-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 4:17 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Yup. Seems to me the worst thing that has happened to Oracle is when Ray
Lane quit. Now Larry is a loose cannon.

--Walt Weaver
  Bozeman, Montana

-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 1:27 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Time will tell.  But it appears that Larry burned quite a few bridges in the
past few months.  Those third party Oracle apps(SAP, Peoplesoft, etc) were
bringing in easy money for Oracle.  Building up the applications side of
Oracle is a good thing, but you dont jump up on the highest pedstal, beat
your chest and insult your, direct or in-direct, partners...like I said,
time will tell.

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Weaver, Walt
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Grabowy, Chris
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Oracle vs DB2 - Oracle lost on cost

2001-04-26 Thread Boivin, Patrice J

To fan the flames, a colleague here sent me this URL re. Oracle on the
DB2/Informix deal:

http://www.oracle.com/start/apr30informix/intro.html
http://www.oracle.com/start/apr30informix/intro.html 

: )

Patrice Boivin
Systems Analyst (Oracle Certified DBA)

Systems Admin  Operations | Admin. et Exploit. des systèmes
Technology Services| Services technologiques
Informatics Branch | Direction de l'informatique 
Maritimes Region, DFO  | Région des Maritimes, MPO

E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Boivin, Patrice J
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Oracle vs DB2

2001-04-25 Thread Boivin, Patrice J

We run our web servers on Oracle Standard Edition.

Regards,
Patrice Boivin
Systems Analyst (Oracle Certified DBA)

Systems Admin  Operations | Admin. et Exploit. des systèmes
Technology Services| Services technologiques
Informatics Branch | Direction de l'informatique 
Maritimes Region, DFO  | Région des Maritimes, MPO

E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


-Original Message-
From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Tuesday, April 24, 2001 6:00 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject:RE: Oracle vs DB2


I just bought 3 STANDARD UPC server licenses for our site. We saved
275K by
not using Enterprise. Email me if you want the details. Walt is
right, they
are lying to you. (The concept of trusting salespersons for
technical
issues is inherently wrong.)

HTH,
Todd Carlson
Oracle 8i Certified DBA
Bunge Corporation





Weaver,

WaltTo: Multiple recipients
of list ORACLE-L   
wweaver@righ[EMAIL PROTECTED]

tnow.comcc:

Sent by: Subject: RE: Oracle vs
DB2 
root@fatcity.

com





04/24/2001

03:16 PM

Please

respond to

ORACLE-L









That's absolutely not true, Dennis. We've purchased Oracle Standard
Edition
for serving web pages, and no one at Oracle told us we could not.

I think you need to find some other salescritters. You're being
taken for a
ride.

--Walt Weaver
  Bozeman, Montana, USA

-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 1:46 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


At 01:13 PM 4/24/01 -0400, you wrote:
But, I believe your comparing apples to oranges.  DB2 UDB
Workgroup is
not
the equal of Oracle Enterprise.  If you want to compare apples 
apples,
try

Yes, but in order to put an Oracle database on the web, I HAVE TO
USE
ENTERPRISE EDITION! The salescritters say so. It has to be unlimited
users.
To repeat: I cannot (legally) put an Oracle database on an
internet-accessible web page unless it is an unlimited-user
(power-units-based) Enterprise edition version of Oracle. Let me put
it
another way: I HAVE TO USE ENTERPRISE EDITION!

Now, it may be that every salescritter I've talked to is wrong about
that,
but if so, what can I do? Reach through the phone, grab them by the
throat,
and demand answers? (Not to say I don't *want* to)

I'm not actually comparing apples to oranges if you look at it from
my POV:
I'm comparing the lowest cost to do what I want using Oracle, to the
lowest
cost to do what I want using DB2. If Oracle demands that I use
Enterprise
Edition with unlimited users, then that's their price.



Dennis Taylor

Beware of false economies.

--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Dennis Taylor
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing
Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Weaver, Walt
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing
Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing

RE: Oracle vs DB2

2001-04-25 Thread Frank N. Pettinato

You are absolutely correct. Oracle's getting this price because they can. I
wonder how much market share they will lose before Larry switches things
around?

When I asked my salescritter about this he said Well we sure are selling
alot of licenses - Go figure...

Thanks,
Frank

-Original Message-
Patrice J
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 9:45 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Well,

This is on topic - www.wired.com http://www.wired.com  today has an
article re. IBM announced that it is buying Informix for $1Billion.

Ah, if only I had that kind of money myself - I could take more Oracle
courses!

I don't know what will happen with Informix then, does that mean they will
gobble it up and DB2 will be the only option in a couple of years?

Regards,
Patrice Boivin
Systems Analyst (Oracle Certified DBA)

Systems Admin  Operations | Admin. et Exploit. des systèmes
Technology Services| Services technologiques
Informatics Branch | Direction de l'informatique
Maritimes Region, DFO  | Région des Maritimes, MPO

E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From:   Dennis Taylor [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Tuesday, April 24, 2001 12:57 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject:Oracle vs DB2

Disclaimer: I am *not* trying to start a religious war, and I am
*not*
trying to advocate DB2. I am simply offended. Thus this post.

As some may remember, I'm doing an evaluation of Oracle vs DB2 vs
SQLServer
to determine our future direction. Here's a datum that makes a
significant
difference to us, dollar-wise.

With Oracle, in order to make a database accessible to the internet
through
a web page, you have to buy an unlimited-user enterprise license. We
had a
senior sales person in our office yesterday, and we asked this
question a
number of different ways. He bobbed and he weaved, but he did not
deny it.
And the quote he supplied afterwards does not address the issue at
all.

Cost of unlimited-user Enterprise version for our installation (your
mileage may vary) = Approx $160,000 Cdn.

IBM, for the same purpose, will sell you DB2 UDB Workgroup edition
(1
user), and something called WE Internet Access, for a total price of
$6000
Cdn. I have a written quote from an IBM salescritter to this effect.

$6000. $160,000. $6000. $160,000. Hm. Let me think.

I respectfully submit that Oracle's pricing structure is out of line
with
market realities, and may have to undergo significant revision.



Dennis Taylor

Don't be fooled by old cliches - He who laughs last may have
just figured out the joke.

--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Dennis Taylor
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing
Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Boivin, Patrice J
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Frank N. Pettinato
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Oracle vs DB2

2001-04-25 Thread Sharpe, Richard


Greetings Friends in California!

If you felt the earth shake, don't worry. It's not an earth quake, it
just Larry Ellison's reaction to the IBM-Informix deal. The man needs to
spend a lot less time picking fights with Bill and a lot more time paying
attention to his market, and from being end-runned. MS has money, but IBM 
prints the stuff.

Cheers!

-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 8:50 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


trying again...

 From: Eric D. Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 14:56:08 -0700
 Subject: RE: Oracle vs DB2

 
 Reportedly what IBM did here some years ago, was sell a 
 mainframe hardware package (for a COBOL/VSAM package) within
 the University system's budget constraints.
 
 Turned out that to actually run the application, several
 millions of $ of additional goodies were needed.
 
 But, they got the original bid.
 
 Dealing with IBM mainframe sales critters (apparently recruited
 directly from some boot camp for counter terrorism?) was not
 exactly the same as dealing with DEC sales critters.
 
 
 
 On 24 Apr 2001, at 13:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  It's that ancillary business you better watch out for!!  IBM is using
DB2
  as their Loss-Leader.
 
 


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Eric D. Pierce
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Sharpe, Richard
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Oracle vs DB2

2001-04-25 Thread Mohan, Ross

|| When I asked my salescritter about this he said Well we 
|| sure are selling alot of licenses - Go figure...

LoL...you know what I think? I think there was an INTERNAL memo
circulated around Oracle sales that basically acknowledged the
problem, and decided that DAMAGE CONTROL would be to give each
complainant the FALSE IMPRESSION that they were the only one
with a complaint. This would tend to ISOLATE the customer, and
make them more likely to pay up than buck what they were
being told was the industry trend. 


|| 
|| Thanks,
|| Frank
|| 
|| -Original Message-
|| Patrice J
|| Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 9:45 AM
|| To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
|| 
|| 
|| Well,
|| 
|| This is on topic - www.wired.com http://www.wired.com  today has an
|| article re. IBM announced that it is buying Informix for $1Billion.
|| 
|| Ah, if only I had that kind of money myself - I could take 
|| more Oracle
|| courses!
|| 
|| I don't know what will happen with Informix then, does that 
|| mean they will
|| gobble it up and DB2 will be the only option in a couple of years?
|| 
|| Regards,
|| Patrice Boivin
|| Systems Analyst (Oracle Certified DBA)
|| 
|| Systems Admin  Operations | Admin. et Exploit. des systèmes
|| Technology Services| Services technologiques
|| Informatics Branch | Direction de l'informatique
|| Maritimes Region, DFO  | Région des Maritimes, MPO
|| 
|| E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|| 
|| 
||  -Original Message-
||  From:   Dennis Taylor [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
||  Sent:   Tuesday, April 24, 2001 12:57 PM
||  To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
||  Subject:Oracle vs DB2
|| 
||  Disclaimer: I am *not* trying to start a religious war, and I am
|| *not*
||  trying to advocate DB2. I am simply offended. Thus this post.
|| 
||  As some may remember, I'm doing an evaluation of Oracle 
|| vs DB2 vs
|| SQLServer
||  to determine our future direction. Here's a datum that makes a
|| significant
||  difference to us, dollar-wise.
|| 
||  With Oracle, in order to make a database accessible to 
|| the internet
|| through
||  a web page, you have to buy an unlimited-user 
|| enterprise license. We
|| had a
||  senior sales person in our office yesterday, and we asked this
|| question a
||  number of different ways. He bobbed and he weaved, but 
|| he did not
|| deny it.
||  And the quote he supplied afterwards does not address 
|| the issue at
|| all.
|| 
||  Cost of unlimited-user Enterprise version for our 
|| installation (your
||  mileage may vary) = Approx $160,000 Cdn.
|| 
||  IBM, for the same purpose, will sell you DB2 UDB 
|| Workgroup edition
|| (1
||  user), and something called WE Internet Access, for a 
|| total price of
|| $6000
||  Cdn. I have a written quote from an IBM salescritter to 
|| this effect.
|| 
||  $6000. $160,000. $6000. $160,000. Hm. Let me think.
|| 
||  I respectfully submit that Oracle's pricing structure 
|| is out of line
|| with
||  market realities, and may have to undergo significant revision.
|| 
|| 
|| 
||  Dennis Taylor
||  
||  Don't be fooled by old cliches - He who laughs last may have
||  just figured out the joke.
|| 
||  --
||  Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
||  --
||  Author: Dennis Taylor
||INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|| 
||  Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: 
|| (858) 538-5051
||  San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing
|| Lists
||  
|| 
||  To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an 
|| E-Mail message
||  to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 
|| 'ListGuru') and in
||  the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
||  (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed 
|| from).  You may
||  also send the HELP command for other information (like 
|| subscribing).
|| --
|| Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
|| --
|| Author: Boivin, Patrice J
||   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|| 
|| Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
|| San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / 
|| Mailing Lists
|| 
|| To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
|| to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
|| the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
|| (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
|| also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
|| 
|| -- 
|| Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
|| -- 
|| Author: Frank N. Pettinato
||   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|| 
|| Fat City Network Services   

RE: Oracle vs DB2

2001-04-25 Thread Eric D. Pierce

This sorta reminds me of the answer I got when I asked why
Oracle thought that they deserved all the extra money they
were going to get from increasing annual support costs during
the Oracle6 - Oracle7 days (aprx. 50% increase each year 
for at least a couple of years).

Oracle said that someone has to pay for all the extra
development costs for Oracle7. I suggested that besides the
Oracle6 customers (some of whom weren't even using Oracle7 
yet), perhaps the *investors* would also be a good source 
for such funding.  (duh?)

They didn't know about that! :)

ep



On 25 Apr 2001, at 6:49, (Frank N. Pettinato [EMAIL PROTECTED]) scribbled with 
alacrity and cogency:

Date sent:  Wed, 25 Apr 2001 06:49:43 -0800
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send reply to:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization:   Fat City Network Services, San Diego, California

 You are absolutely correct. Oracle's getting this price because they can. I
 wonder how much market share they will lose before Larry switches things
 around?
 
 When I asked my salescritter about this he said Well we sure are selling
 alot of licenses - Go figure...

...


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Eric D. Pierce
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Oracle vs DB2 - Oracle lost on cost

2001-04-25 Thread Brian Wisniewski

The client I work for (for the next 2 weeks at least) just made the
decision to use UDB over Oracle due to the price of licenses from
Oracle.  And this is a startup with a big ol' pile of capital.  Go
figure, I thought startup's always picked the most expensive stuff.
They must be saving on the DB for the skating rink.

- Brian

--- Henry Poras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I guess they can make their money by targeting the high end and
 having a few
 high paying customers, or be more reasonable and have a broader base.
 I get
 the feeling that Larry's ego (psychoanalysis from a distance, ain't
 it
 wonderful) would drive him to both the $ and the broad base. If you
 are
 competing against Bill Gates, you not only need the money, but also
 the
 exposure. Everyone knows Windows, you can't have just the elite
 knowing
 about Oracle. So where does that put us in 6 months?
 
 Henry
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Brian Wisniewski
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: RE: Oracle vs DB2

2001-04-25 Thread Weaver, Walt

I agree, MySQL is a good way to start out. That's what we did here. It's
fast and free. Our product runs with MySQL, SQL Server, and Oracle. The
MySQL version allows us to sell to companies that want to use our product
but could never afford an Oracle license.

But, when it comes to larger companies (such as Toyota, Motorola, Swissair,
etc.) that generate a lot of customer traffic with our product MySQL just
doesn't scale well. Data corruption is a constant problem, and that's where
Oracle comes in. It's stable, reliable, and the large companies that need
the reliability can actually afford the licensing.  :)

We also use Postgres here for some internal applications and it works very
well.

--Walt Weaver
  Bozeman, Montana, USA

-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 8:50 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L

true, but when cost is the decisive factor w/ a startup, go with the one of
the freebies.  if the company was too cheap to buy the right product, time
to find a company w/ deeper pockets.  now w/ ibm buying informix, merging w/
db2, they will have a new product called db4mix :).  the free db's are fun
to play with but their skills don't pay the bills.

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/25/01 08:36AM 
So isn't PostGres, but neither is a close competitor.

Reply Separator
Author: Gene Sais [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:   4/24/2001 1:28 PM

hmmm, mysql is free, best price of all.

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Weaver, Walt
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Oracle vs DB2

2001-04-24 Thread Boivin, Patrice J

Well,

This is on topic - www.wired.com http://www.wired.com  today has an
article re. IBM announced that it is buying Informix for $1Billion.

Ah, if only I had that kind of money myself - I could take more Oracle
courses!

I don't know what will happen with Informix then, does that mean they will
gobble it up and DB2 will be the only option in a couple of years?

Regards,
Patrice Boivin
Systems Analyst (Oracle Certified DBA)

Systems Admin  Operations | Admin. et Exploit. des systèmes
Technology Services| Services technologiques
Informatics Branch | Direction de l'informatique 
Maritimes Region, DFO  | Région des Maritimes, MPO

E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


-Original Message-
From:   Dennis Taylor [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Tuesday, April 24, 2001 12:57 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject:Oracle vs DB2

Disclaimer: I am *not* trying to start a religious war, and I am
*not*
trying to advocate DB2. I am simply offended. Thus this post.

As some may remember, I'm doing an evaluation of Oracle vs DB2 vs
SQLServer
to determine our future direction. Here's a datum that makes a
significant
difference to us, dollar-wise.

With Oracle, in order to make a database accessible to the internet
through
a web page, you have to buy an unlimited-user enterprise license. We
had a
senior sales person in our office yesterday, and we asked this
question a
number of different ways. He bobbed and he weaved, but he did not
deny it.
And the quote he supplied afterwards does not address the issue at
all.

Cost of unlimited-user Enterprise version for our installation (your
mileage may vary) = Approx $160,000 Cdn.

IBM, for the same purpose, will sell you DB2 UDB Workgroup edition
(1
user), and something called WE Internet Access, for a total price of
$6000
Cdn. I have a written quote from an IBM salescritter to this effect.

$6000. $160,000. $6000. $160,000. Hm. Let me think.

I respectfully submit that Oracle's pricing structure is out of line
with
market realities, and may have to undergo significant revision.



Dennis Taylor

Don't be fooled by old cliches - He who laughs last may have
just figured out the joke.

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Dennis Taylor
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing
Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Boivin, Patrice J
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: Oracle vs DB2

2001-04-24 Thread Dan . Hubler



Why the enterprise license for Oracle?






Dennis Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]@fatcity.com on 04/24/2001 10:57:11 AM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sent by:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


To:   Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:


Disclaimer: I am *not* trying to start a religious war, and I am *not*
trying to advocate DB2. I am simply offended. Thus this post.

As some may remember, I'm doing an evaluation of Oracle vs DB2 vs SQLServer
to determine our future direction. Here's a datum that makes a significant
difference to us, dollar-wise.

With Oracle, in order to make a database accessible to the internet through
a web page, you have to buy an unlimited-user enterprise license. We had a
senior sales person in our office yesterday, and we asked this question a
number of different ways. He bobbed and he weaved, but he did not deny it.
And the quote he supplied afterwards does not address the issue at all.

Cost of unlimited-user Enterprise version for our installation (your
mileage may vary) = Approx $160,000 Cdn.

IBM, for the same purpose, will sell you DB2 UDB Workgroup edition (1
user), and something called WE Internet Access, for a total price of $6000
Cdn. I have a written quote from an IBM salescritter to this effect.

$6000. $160,000. $6000. $160,000. Hm. Let me think.

I respectfully submit that Oracle's pricing structure is out of line with
market realities, and may have to undergo significant revision.



Dennis Taylor

Don't be fooled by old cliches - He who laughs last may have
just figured out the joke.

--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Dennis Taylor
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Oracle vs DB2

2001-04-24 Thread Murali Vallath

Boivin,

Not true, when Oracle purchased Rdb from Digital 10 years ago. This was the 
talk, Rdb will die in 7 years.

Today it is being enhanced every version/release.

SO DON'T KNOW, what IBM will do.

Murali Vallath


Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 08:45:27 -0800

Well,

This is on topic - www.wired.com http://www.wired.com  today has an
article re. IBM announced that it is buying Informix for $1Billion.

Ah, if only I had that kind of money myself - I could take more Oracle
courses!

I don't know what will happen with Informix then, does that mean they will
gobble it up and DB2 will be the only option in a couple of years?

Regards,
Patrice Boivin
Systems Analyst (Oracle Certified DBA)

Systems Admin  Operations | Admin. et Exploit. des systèmes
Technology Services| Services technologiques
Informatics Branch | Direction de l'informatique
Maritimes Region, DFO  | Région des Maritimes, MPO

E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From:   Dennis Taylor [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Tuesday, April 24, 2001 12:57 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject:Oracle vs DB2

Disclaimer: I am *not* trying to start a religious war, and I am
*not*
trying to advocate DB2. I am simply offended. Thus this post.

As some may remember, I'm doing an evaluation of Oracle vs DB2 vs
SQLServer
to determine our future direction. Here's a datum that makes a
significant
difference to us, dollar-wise.

With Oracle, in order to make a database accessible to the internet
through
a web page, you have to buy an unlimited-user enterprise license. We
had a
senior sales person in our office yesterday, and we asked this
question a
number of different ways. He bobbed and he weaved, but he did not
deny it.
And the quote he supplied afterwards does not address the issue at
all.

Cost of unlimited-user Enterprise version for our installation (your
mileage may vary) = Approx $160,000 Cdn.

IBM, for the same purpose, will sell you DB2 UDB Workgroup edition
(1
user), and something called WE Internet Access, for a total price of
$6000
Cdn. I have a written quote from an IBM salescritter to this effect.

$6000. $160,000. $6000. $160,000. Hm. Let me think.

I respectfully submit that Oracle's pricing structure is out of line
with
market realities, and may have to undergo significant revision.



Dennis Taylor

Don't be fooled by old cliches - He who laughs last may have
just figured out the joke.

--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Dennis Taylor
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing
Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Boivin, Patrice J
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Murali Vallath
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information 

RE: Oracle vs DB2

2001-04-24 Thread Weaver, Walt

Not true. You can use the Standard Edition for serving web pages. We're
doing it. 

Costs much less than $160,000, although still more than $6,000 Cdn.

One thing I don't get: it's $6,000 Cdn for a 1-user license, right? How is a
1-user license going to do you any good if you're serving web pages? Just
interested in how the WE Internet Access works.

We had some IBM guys in here late last year, and they couldn't give us any
better pricing than what we could get Oracle Standard Edition for.

--Walt Weaver
  Bozeman, Montana


Dennis Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]@fatcity.com on 04/24/2001 10:57:11 AM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sent by:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


To:   Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:

With Oracle, in order to make a database accessible to the internet through
a web page, you have to buy an unlimited-user enterprise license. We had a
senior sales person in our office yesterday, and we asked this question a
number of different ways. He bobbed and he weaved, but he did not deny it.
And the quote he supplied afterwards does not address the issue at all.

Cost of unlimited-user Enterprise version for our installation (your
mileage may vary) = Approx $160,000 Cdn.

IBM, for the same purpose, will sell you DB2 UDB Workgroup edition (1
user), and something called WE Internet Access, for a total price of $6000
Cdn. I have a written quote from an IBM salescritter to this effect.

$6000. $160,000. $6000. $160,000. Hm. Let me think.

I respectfully submit that Oracle's pricing structure is out of line with
market realities, and may have to undergo significant revision.



Dennis Taylor

Don't be fooled by old cliches - He who laughs last may have
just figured out the joke.

--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Dennis Taylor
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Weaver, Walt
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Oracle vs DB2

2001-04-24 Thread Jamadagni, Rajendra

Now we know how Oracle saved a billion $$ ??

Raj
__
Rajendra Jamadagni  MIS, ESPN Inc.
Rajendra dot Jamadagni at ESPN dot com
Any opinion expressed here is personal and doesn't reflect that of ESPN Inc.

QOTD: Any clod can have facts, but having an opinion is an art !


-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 11:57 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L

[snip]
$6000. $160,000. $6000. $160,000. Hm. Let me think.

I respectfully submit that Oracle's pricing structure is out of line with
market realities, and may have to undergo significant revision.

[snip]

*

This e-mail message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) above 
and may contain information that is privileged, attorney work product or exempt from 
disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this message in error, or are 
not the named recipient(s), please immediately notify ESPN at (860) 766-2000 and 
delete this e-mail message from your computer, Thank you.

*

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Jamadagni, Rajendra
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: Oracle vs DB2

2001-04-24 Thread Tim Sawmiller

FYI, the Oracle Marketing spiel... 

Price Does Not Equal Cost 
Databases store, protect, manage and provide access to a company's most important 
business asset * information. There is no other product that a company will buy that 
has a greater effect on information systems. Selecting the wrong database product can 
compromise business growth and profitability. It would make sense to select a database 
product based on price alone if database products were the predominant part of the 
overall information technology expenditures. But this is simply not the case. Software 
costs (including upgrades and technical support) typically represent less than 15% of 
an IT budget and are small compared to the overall costs of hardware, operations and 
maintenance, consulting and training.  

 IBM DB2's Hidden Costs 
IBM never talks about the hidden costs of running an application on DB2: 
DB2 needs a more expensive hardware infrastructure to deliver the same level of 
service as Oracle. Oracle database is faster and more efficient than IBM DB2 on the 
same hardware configuration.  Oracle database supports more users and handles a 
greater workload with a smaller and less expensive hardware configuration. The real 
proof is IBM using Oracle database, not DB2, to benchmark its Unix hardware platforms. 
Oracle offers a more complete solution for high availability than IBM. DB2 lacks high 
availability features and makes IBM rely on hardware to deliver high availability. As 
a result, DB2 requires a more expensive hardware configuration to deliver the same 
level of availability as Oracle. According to an IBM-sponsored study by the Standish 
Group, even modest increases in availability can amount to millions of dollars saved 
each year. You can depend on Oracle to keep your business running and keep your IT 
budget under control.  
Oracle has far superior security features compared to DB2. Oracle has 13 security 
certifications from independent and internationally recognized organizations, IBM has 
none. Delivering a 100% secure solution with DB2 means additional software and 
consulting costs. IT Managers should be aware that security breaches amount to 
billions of dollars in losses every year for businesses around the world.  
DB2 lacks the advanced and automated system resource management capabilities than 
Oracle can deliver. Using DB2 means higher on-going maintenance costs.  
Choosing DB2 as a strategic database provider locks IT organizations into IBM's world: 
DB2's lack of third-party applications means more expensive development costs or 
inability to handle critical business processes. More than 17,000 applications from 
independent software vendors run on Oracle providing a pool of solutions unequaled by 
IBM.  
DB2 has limited functionality and is not optimized on non-IBM platforms such as HP or 
Sun which are IBM' s fierce competitors in the hardware market. As a result, DB2 locks 
you into IBM hardware at higher cost and risk of low performance.  
DB2 is not DB2 is not DB2.  DB2's code base is different on Unix and NT than on AS/400 
and the mainframe. This platform incompatibility leads to higher costs. While IBM 
claims 90% compatibility, the last 10% can mean a lot of wasted time for developers. 
Most applications are prototyped on NT first, then extended to the platform they will 
be deployed on. With IBM, developers know they will have to rewrite part of their 
code.  
There are more trained DBAs for Oracle than for DB2, making it easier to deploy and 
manage application running on Oracle database. Oracle has nurtured a 1.4 million 
strong developer community which is now is a deep pool of talent that IBM cannot 
offer. Gartner summarizes it all in a review of DB2: While IBM's per-processor 
pricing model makes DB2 especially attractive to the midrange and high-end markets, 
users should carefully weigh their anticipated total cost of ownership factoring in 
the difficulty of finding experienced DB2 developers and administrators.  
IBM's solutions are far less integrated than Oracle's and require additional time and 
resources before they can go live. Let's take security as an example. Oracle Advanced 
Security and Oracle database are fully integrated. These two products are developed by 
the same teams. To get access to security that are  functionally comparable to Oracle, 
IBM's customers need to acquire IBM Secureway, which comes from a totally different 
product line. 

 Quality Equals Economy 
Because a database is such a key technology, quality matters more than just software 
price. Who wants to run a general ledger application on an infrastructure that cannot 
handle peak loads? Who wants to run a global e-commerce or customer support 
application on a system that must go offline every week for maintenance? Who wants to 
run an HR system on a database that compromises on data integrity? 
An application running on Oracle costs less to operate than an application running on 
DB2 simply 

Re: Oracle vs DB2

2001-04-24 Thread Dan . Hubler



Maybe I am wrong here but..

My understanding is that you can use standard or enterprise for any
appication you wish.

If your application communicates with the Web/internet, you have to license
the
product based on UPU's;  they will not accept a named user license.

???






Dennis Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]@fatcity.com on 04/24/2001 01:22:56 PM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sent by:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


To:   Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:


At 09:31 AM 4/24/01 -0800, you wrote:


Why the enterprise license for Oracle?


Because that's what they require.


Dennis Taylor

Don't be fooled by old cliches - He who laughs last may have
just figured out the joke.

--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Dennis Taylor
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Oracle vs DB2

2001-04-24 Thread Dennis Taylor

At 10:46 AM 4/24/01 -0800, you wrote:
Not true. You can use the Standard Edition for serving web pages. We're
doing it. 

Yep. I've corrected myself on that in another email.

One thing I don't get: it's $6,000 Cdn for a 1-user license, right? How is a
1-user license going to do you any good if you're serving web pages? Just
interested in how the WE Internet Access works.

The 1-user license + WE = a legal DB2 web-database. This according to the
IBM salescritter. Got it on paper, too. :-)


We had some IBM guys in here late last year, and they couldn't give us any
better pricing than what we could get Oracle Standard Edition for.

Times change. My salescritter is saying that in some cases, IBM is *giving*
DB2 away, if there's enough ancilliary business (hardware, consulting, etc).

I guess I should add a disclaimer to my rant at this point. We are a small
shop. I mean *SMALL* shop. 30 people in the company. 30K for a web database
may be peanuts for a fortune 500 company, but for us, it's significant. YMMV.




Dennis Taylor

Beware of false economies.

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Dennis Taylor
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: Oracle vs DB2

2001-04-24 Thread Dennis Taylor

I received a version of this from the salescritter as well, and went
through it with a fine-toothed comb. Some of the statements are simply
false. Some are value judgements expressed as imperative statements, with
no backup. Some may be true, but again, I'd like to see support for the
statement.


At 10:46 AM 4/24/01 -0800, you wrote:
FYI, the Oracle Marketing spiel... 

Price Does Not Equal Cost 
Databases store, protect, manage and provide access to a company's most
important business asset * information. There is no other product that a
company will buy that has a greater effect on information systems.
Selecting the wrong database product can compromise business growth and
profitability. It would make sense to select a database product based on
price alone if database products were the predominant part of the overall
information technology expenditures. But this is simply not the case.
Software costs (including upgrades and technical support) typically
represent less than 15% of an IT budget and are small compared to the
overall costs of hardware, operations and maintenance, consulting and
training.  

 IBM DB2's Hidden Costs 
IBM never talks about the hidden costs of running an application on DB2: 
DB2 needs a more expensive hardware infrastructure to deliver the same
level of service as Oracle. Oracle database is faster and more efficient
than IBM DB2 on the same hardware configuration.  Oracle database supports
more users and handles a greater workload with a smaller and less expensive
hardware configuration. The real proof is IBM using Oracle database, not
DB2, to benchmark its Unix hardware platforms. 
Oracle offers a more complete solution for high availability than IBM. DB2
lacks high availability features and makes IBM rely on hardware to deliver
high availability. As a result, DB2 requires a more expensive hardware
configuration to deliver the same level of availability as Oracle.
According to an IBM-sponsored study by the Standish Group, even modest
increases in availability can amount to millions of dollars saved each
year. You can depend on Oracle to keep your business running and keep your
IT budget under control.  
Oracle has far superior security features compared to DB2. Oracle has 13
security certifications from independent and internationally recognized
organizations, IBM has none. Delivering a 100% secure solution with DB2
means additional software and consulting costs. IT Managers should be aware
that security breaches amount to billions of dollars in losses every year
for businesses around the world.  
DB2 lacks the advanced and automated system resource management
capabilities than Oracle can deliver. Using DB2 means higher on-going
maintenance costs.  
Choosing DB2 as a strategic database provider locks IT organizations into
IBM's world: 
DB2's lack of third-party applications means more expensive development
costs or inability to handle critical business processes. More than 17,000
applications from independent software vendors run on Oracle providing a
pool of solutions unequaled by IBM.  
DB2 has limited functionality and is not optimized on non-IBM platforms
such as HP or Sun which are IBM' s fierce competitors in the hardware
market. As a result, DB2 locks you into IBM hardware at higher cost and
risk of low performance.  
DB2 is not DB2 is not DB2.  DB2's code base is different on Unix and NT
than on AS/400 and the mainframe. This platform incompatibility leads to
higher costs. While IBM claims 90% compatibility, the last 10% can mean a
lot of wasted time for developers. Most applications are prototyped on NT
first, then extended to the platform they will be deployed on. With IBM,
developers know they will have to rewrite part of their code.  
There are more trained DBAs for Oracle than for DB2, making it easier to
deploy and manage application running on Oracle database. Oracle has
nurtured a 1.4 million strong developer community which is now is a deep
pool of talent that IBM cannot offer. Gartner summarizes it all in a review
of DB2: While IBM's per-processor pricing model makes DB2 especially
attractive to the midrange and high-end markets, users should carefully
weigh their anticipated total cost of ownership factoring in the difficulty
of finding experienced DB2 developers and administrators.  
IBM's solutions are far less integrated than Oracle's and require
additional time and resources before they can go live. Let's take security
as an example. Oracle Advanced Security and Oracle database are fully
integrated. These two products are developed by the same teams. To get
access to security that are  functionally comparable to Oracle, IBM's
customers need to acquire IBM Secureway, which comes from a totally
different product line. 

 Quality Equals Economy 
Because a database is such a key technology, quality matters more than
just software price. Who wants to run a general ledger application on an
infrastructure that cannot handle peak loads? Who wants to run a 

RE: Oracle vs DB2

2001-04-24 Thread Weaver, Walt

That's absolutely not true, Dennis. We've purchased Oracle Standard Edition
for serving web pages, and no one at Oracle told us we could not.

I think you need to find some other salescritters. You're being taken for a
ride.

--Walt Weaver
  Bozeman, Montana, USA

-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 1:46 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


At 01:13 PM 4/24/01 -0400, you wrote:
But, I believe your comparing apples to oranges.  DB2 UDB Workgroup is
not
the equal of Oracle Enterprise.  If you want to compare apples  apples,
try

Yes, but in order to put an Oracle database on the web, I HAVE TO USE
ENTERPRISE EDITION! The salescritters say so. It has to be unlimited users.
To repeat: I cannot (legally) put an Oracle database on an
internet-accessible web page unless it is an unlimited-user
(power-units-based) Enterprise edition version of Oracle. Let me put it
another way: I HAVE TO USE ENTERPRISE EDITION!

Now, it may be that every salescritter I've talked to is wrong about that,
but if so, what can I do? Reach through the phone, grab them by the throat,
and demand answers? (Not to say I don't *want* to)

I'm not actually comparing apples to oranges if you look at it from my POV:
I'm comparing the lowest cost to do what I want using Oracle, to the lowest
cost to do what I want using DB2. If Oracle demands that I use Enterprise
Edition with unlimited users, then that's their price.



Dennis Taylor

Beware of false economies.

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Dennis Taylor
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Weaver, Walt
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Oracle vs DB2

2001-04-24 Thread Ed . Haskins

Dennis,

The IBM Sales Critter hit the nail on the head by saying:

that in some cases, IBM is *giving* DB2 away, if there's enough ancillary
business (hardware, consulting, etc).

It's that ancillary business you better watch out for!!  IBM is using DB2
as their Loss-Leader.

Ed Haskins
Oracle DBA
Verizon Wireless



-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 4:28 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


At 10:46 AM 4/24/01 -0800, you wrote:
Not true. You can use the Standard Edition for serving web pages. We're
doing it. 

Yep. I've corrected myself on that in another email.

One thing I don't get: it's $6,000 Cdn for a 1-user license, right? How is
a
1-user license going to do you any good if you're serving web pages? Just
interested in how the WE Internet Access works.

The 1-user license + WE = a legal DB2 web-database. This according to the
IBM salescritter. Got it on paper, too. :-)


We had some IBM guys in here late last year, and they couldn't give us any
better pricing than what we could get Oracle Standard Edition for.

Times change. My salescritter is saying that in some cases, IBM is *giving*
DB2 away, if there's enough ancilliary business (hardware, consulting, etc).

I guess I should add a disclaimer to my rant at this point. We are a small
shop. I mean *SMALL* shop. 30 people in the company. 30K for a web database
may be peanuts for a fortune 500 company, but for us, it's significant.
YMMV.




Dennis Taylor

Beware of false economies.

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Dennis Taylor
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Oracle vs DB2

2001-04-24 Thread TCarlson


I just bought 3 STANDARD UPC server licenses for our site. We saved 275K by
not using Enterprise. Email me if you want the details. Walt is right, they
are lying to you. (The concept of trusting salespersons for technical
issues is inherently wrong.)

HTH,
Todd Carlson
Oracle 8i Certified DBA
Bunge Corporation



   
 
Weaver,   
 
WaltTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L  
 
wweaver@righ[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
tnow.comcc:   
 
Sent by: Subject: RE: Oracle vs DB2
 
root@fatcity.  
 
com
 
   
 
   
 
04/24/2001 
 
03:16 PM   
 
Please 
 
respond to 
 
ORACLE-L   
 
   
 
   
 




That's absolutely not true, Dennis. We've purchased Oracle Standard Edition
for serving web pages, and no one at Oracle told us we could not.

I think you need to find some other salescritters. You're being taken for a
ride.

--Walt Weaver
  Bozeman, Montana, USA

-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 1:46 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


At 01:13 PM 4/24/01 -0400, you wrote:
But, I believe your comparing apples to oranges.  DB2 UDB Workgroup is
not
the equal of Oracle Enterprise.  If you want to compare apples  apples,
try

Yes, but in order to put an Oracle database on the web, I HAVE TO USE
ENTERPRISE EDITION! The salescritters say so. It has to be unlimited users.
To repeat: I cannot (legally) put an Oracle database on an
internet-accessible web page unless it is an unlimited-user
(power-units-based) Enterprise edition version of Oracle. Let me put it
another way: I HAVE TO USE ENTERPRISE EDITION!

Now, it may be that every salescritter I've talked to is wrong about that,
but if so, what can I do? Reach through the phone, grab them by the throat,
and demand answers? (Not to say I don't *want* to)

I'm not actually comparing apples to oranges if you look at it from my POV:
I'm comparing the lowest cost to do what I want using Oracle, to the lowest
cost to do what I want using DB2. If Oracle demands that I use Enterprise
Edition with unlimited users, then that's their price.



Dennis Taylor

Beware of false economies.

--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Dennis Taylor
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Weaver, Walt
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).




-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California

RE: Oracle vs DB2

2001-04-24 Thread Gene Sais

hmmm, mysql is free, best price of all.

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/24/01 04:27PM 
At 10:46 AM 4/24/01 -0800, you wrote:
Not true. You can use the Standard Edition for serving web pages. We're
doing it. 

Yep. I've corrected myself on that in another email.

One thing I don't get: it's $6,000 Cdn for a 1-user license, right? How is a
1-user license going to do you any good if you're serving web pages? Just
interested in how the WE Internet Access works.

The 1-user license + WE = a legal DB2 web-database. This according to the
IBM salescritter. Got it on paper, too. :-)


We had some IBM guys in here late last year, and they couldn't give us any
better pricing than what we could get Oracle Standard Edition for.

Times change. My salescritter is saying that in some cases, IBM is *giving*
DB2 away, if there's enough ancilliary business (hardware, consulting, etc).

I guess I should add a disclaimer to my rant at this point. We are a small
shop. I mean *SMALL* shop. 30 people in the company. 30K for a web database
may be peanuts for a fortune 500 company, but for us, it's significant. YMMV.




Dennis Taylor

Beware of false economies.

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com 
-- 
Author: Dennis Taylor
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Gene Sais
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Oracle vs DB2

2001-04-24 Thread Eric D. Pierce

trying again...

 From: Eric D. Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 14:56:08 -0700
 Subject: RE: Oracle vs DB2

 
 Reportedly what IBM did here some years ago, was sell a 
 mainframe hardware package (for a COBOL/VSAM package) within
 the University system's budget constraints.
 
 Turned out that to actually run the application, several
 millions of $ of additional goodies were needed.
 
 But, they got the original bid.
 
 Dealing with IBM mainframe sales critters (apparently recruited
 directly from some boot camp for counter terrorism?) was not
 exactly the same as dealing with DEC sales critters.
 
 
 
 On 24 Apr 2001, at 13:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  It's that ancillary business you better watch out for!!  IBM is using DB2
  as their Loss-Leader.
 
 


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Eric D. Pierce
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).