[OSList] Wikipedia clean up
Dear friends, I am writing an article and just notice the Wikipedia entry for OST has a warning on the top that says it’s written like an advertisement. Anyone feeling comfortable editing Wikipedia could fix this? Best wishes to all Paul Nunesdea, PhD, CPF https://www.linkedin.com/today/author/nunesdea Sent from my iPhone___ OSList mailing list To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org To unsubscribe send an email to oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org To subscribe or manage your subscription click below: http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org Past archives can be viewed here: http://www.mail-archive.com/oslist@lists.openspacetech.org
Re: [OSList] Okay...Forget Certification then...How about Co-Creating a NEW OST ASSOCIATION? Such as...THE International Association for Peace and Human Understanding...?
Greetings HO, I have been away from this list except when something extraordinarily contentious happens here, and I got attracted by the certification subject. Yes, just to say I am among those that used OST by reading your book + an extremely helpful and long coaching call from Lisa Heft - the Open Space Community's Mary Magdalene. Since then the power of self-organization never ceased to amaze me, and to be honest my most precious ally when big challenges are faced. I have written books about group facilitation in my mother languages, I argue OST is the ultimate group facilitation methodology, inspired by seminal work of very dear IAF colleagues (and your disciples?) here in Europe, Gerardo de Luzemberg and Jean-Philippe Poupard. And your answer below, reinforces my faith on this absolute mystery of self-organization that have been helping me so much. Tanks for the unsuspected Dee Hock's book recommendation, I will read it next. I apologize Listers if this other unsuspected reference below has already been discussed here before, but I recently re-discovered Lao Tzu book Tao Te Ching (the book of the way) and cannot think about the resemblances with your discoveries HO. If you like listening instead of reading, this is an amazing free resource on Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o2UYch2JnO4 I suspect Lao Tzu's interpretation of what the master will do about OST's certification is just about what you have written below, beloved father. Best wishes Paul Nunesdea | Paulo Nunes de Abreu https://www.architectingcollaboration.com/ Sent from my iPhone > On 20 Aug 2019, at 22:15, Harrison Owen via OSList > wrote: > > Barry -- your notion about "scale" -- numbers of people -- is pretty close to > the accepted wisdom. Summed up in the old refrain, Some day we got to get > organized! Especially when we get bigger. Certainly makes sense, keeps a lot > of MBA programs in business, but simply doesn't accord with my experience. > First in terms of my usual standard reference... Open Spaces. The curious, > but I think instructive thing, is that every Open Space that I have > facilitated or been a part of -- regardless of size (5- 2108) has been > unnervingly the same. 10-15 minutes for opening, 20 min for issue > announcement, 30 minutes for market place arrangements (combinations, > reschedules, cup of coffee) 1 hour to start of first session -- and from > there on it all happened by itself. This has even been true in several > situation where a very hard working planning committee worked out every > detail in accord with the best meeting management protocols. Looked great on > paper, immediately fell apart, and just as quickly self organized, despite > their best efforts. Weird! > > Then there is the observed behavior and accomplishments of what we might > vaguely call, "The Open Space Community." If you put aside all question of > how we got there, the accomplishments I believe are rather impressive. Indeed > there are very few HR consulting groups that could come anywhere close. Just > take the numbers: 35 years in business, minimum 500,000 "interventions," > millions of participants, thousands of facilitators, massive coverage by the > international press, and a multitude of imitators -- which is always a > complement in a weird way. Not bad if I do say so myself. AND it might be > pointed out that all of this took place without a shred of formal > organization, no institutional funding, no defined leadership structure, zero > effort at standardization or certification. Why would anybody want to change > that ... even if you could? > > And then in the REAL WORLD... That would be Corporations, Governments, NGOs > -- I can give you any number of examples where such organizations spent > millions of $$$ to get organized, failed, -- and then opened some space to > accomplish in several days where they had failed miserably for years. I "did" > a few of those personally, but in most cases (if I was directly involved) I > advised that they save a lot of money, buy the book, and do it. And of course > there were any number of situations where sensitive participants of one OST > simply went out and "did" it again without benefit of book, training, > certification. Marvelous! > > And if you want "testimony" from a different, and presumably unbiased source, > check out Dee Hock, "Chaordic Organizations." > > Harrison (and -- of course -- also your father.) > > > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Barry Owen via OSList > To: World wide Open Space Technology email list > > Cc: Barry Owen ; Michael M Pannwitz > > Sent: Tue, Aug 20, 2019 11:10 am > Subject: Re: [OSList] Okay...Forget Certification then...How about > Co-Creating a NEW OST ASSOCIATION? Such as...THE International Association > for Peace and Human Understanding...? > > I've been mulling this over for months now. > Have come to what I think is a conclusion
Re: [OSList] A Little tremor...
Politicians ride waves or at least help to shape them and fear is one of the items in their tool chest. Fear of the other is such a powerful tool. Advertisers know that. I was not surprised with the BREXIT (the UK vote lo leave). I have heard that human civilizations go in cycles, like the whole planet itself. There is something of a strange kind of energy that is accumulating recently and that started with the Arab springs, certain equivalent movements in China and Europe, namely in Spain that is going to face elections this weekend. These spontaneous movements are the bedrock of a new breed of political parties in Europe. In Greece and in the city of Rome they won the majority. Alas, this energy also reveals itself in non-constructive modes. The riots prior and during the UEFA cup games are also an evidence of this energy in latency. Who knows this is also what happened in England? The manifestation of a societal energy that is mad at something. A will that resists the rain in polling day. A will so in-depth that the day of vote some realize they have lied to themselves during the opinion polls. On the TV news I remember this British guy from the public saying: "in my heart, I will say leave but with my head, I must vote to stay." The heart took control and bingo - a huge stone was thrown in the pond. I also would have voted to leave. The EU pond is murky. We see waves of refugees and children dying in the see - WAIT A MINUTE did I said children are dying in the mediterranean sea? In spite of the honorable intentions of their founding fathers the EU remains a private club of nations whose political representatives selfishly seek to please their own constituencies. I suspect the US history can teach our EU politicians how to build a united land. US is the land where OST emerged in recent years and that is part of the same strange energy Are we going to close the cycle and get back towards where we started as a single global tribe 50.000 years ago? I see the BREXIT has an opportunity for that. The EU needs reinvention. Keep calm and carry on. On 25 June 2016 at 00:30, Royle, Karl via OSListwrote: Many of us brits were in the 48%. Who voted to stay in and probably trying to become Scottish or Irish And 75% of people aged 18 to 25 were in favour of staying in. The vote wasn’t about the eu but was caused by persistent inequality and generated fear of the other by a ruling elite that should have known better. The Uk will ultimately be ok ish The fear will start if the rest of the EU folds as a result. Not so much opening space but creating a black hole Pip pop From: OSList on behalf of Harrison Owen via OSList Reply-To: Harrison Owen , World wide Open Space Technology email list Date: Friday, 24 June 2016 22:00 To: 'World wide Open Space Technology email list' Subject: [OSList] A Little tremor... You may have noticed a certain shaking in the World Order. It registered 611.21 on the Dow Jones. That’s a negative 611.21. Essentially wiped out all gains for the year. Money is only what you think it is and … suddenly… pooof! IT wasn’t !!! One of the “trending stories” on the New York Times was about Brits Googling to find out what they had done to themselves. Marvelous. It doesn’t seem to be “trending” anymore or I would send it to you. But such things do come and go. Of course there has been a massive cast of characters, casting stones at everybody else. Idiots! …along with a smaller set who are sure they know exactly what to do, how to do it, and who should be in charge. Themselves, of course. Definitely interesting times. Might be something worth talking about? This is called opening space, seeing who shows up, and knowing that whoever cares will be precisely the right people for the conversation. Of course we didn’t do a lot of “pre-work.” Who knew the Brits were going to be a crazy as they were/are? – or are they? And no matter… Serious stuff never happens on schedule, according to plan… when we are all prepared… And to quote a great saint (Brian)…. Whenever… Harrison Winter Address 7808 River Falls Dr. Potomac, MD 20854 301-365-2093 Summer Address 189 Beaucauire Ave Camden, ME 04843 207 763-3261 Websites www.openspaceworld.com www.ho-image.com ___ OSList mailing list To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org To unsubscribe send an email to oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org To subscribe or manage your subscription click below: http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org Past archives can be viewed here: http://www.mail-archive.com/oslist@lists.openspacetech.org ___ OSList
Re: [OSList] Opening space when borders are closing
Way to go! From my iPad > On 15/11/2015, at 22:57, Harrison Owen via OSList >wrote: > > The events in Paris have caught our attention. However, with deepest respect > and sympathy for my Parisian friends (Christine in particular), the simple > truth is that the human toll (127 and counting) is only the daily score in > many troubled spots of the world. You can name them as well as I. > > And Mr Holland, President of France, declaring, “This is an act of War,” and > “promising” retaliation of whatever sort -- is quite understandable. Of > course he also (according to the American Press) closed the borders. Again > understandable, but curious especially when it appears that some > substantial portion of the combatants (enemy) are French. Somehow the enemy > is us This is not your grandfather’s war. > > Or Something. > > Any human being who claims to understand what is going on, and feels > competent to prescribe the specific solution (close the borders, open the > borders, ban the immigrants, welcome the immigrants, shoot them all, > whatever) is, in my humble judgment, quite mad. > > I, however, will venture one affirmative (positive) statement. We (That’s all > 7 ½ Billion of us) are in a Transformative Moment. How long it will last, and > what the end result will be, I don’t have a clue. But I do believe that it > will take all 7 ½ billion of us, working together, to solve the issues at > hand. Tall order, to be sure. Then again, we have had some several hundred > thousand years’ practice. And to date – despite all odds – we’re still here. > > And the magic sauce? > > I do know some things it’s (special sauce) NOT: a special program, ideology, > methodology, tool, technique, intervention, practice, discipline... > > It is something that has been around a lot longer, much more basic and > fundamental. > > You guessed it. Self Organization. > > We did not invent it. Certainly didn’t create it. But we can help, I do > believe. > > Open Space wherever, whenever, however, with whom-so-ever as often as you > can. If nothing else, it will give you something to do during this > Transformative Moment. > > Harrison > > > > Winter Address > 7808 River Falls Drive > Potomac, MD 20854 > 301-365-2093 > > Summer Address > 189 Beaucaire Ave. > Camden, ME 04843 > 207-763-3261 > > Websites > www.openspaceworld.com > www.ho-image.com > OSLIST To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives of > OSLIST Go > to:http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org > > ___ > OSList mailing list > To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org > To unsubscribe send an email to oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org > To subscribe or manage your subscription click below: > http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org > Past archives can be viewed here: > http://www.mail-archive.com/oslist@lists.openspacetech.org ___ OSList mailing list To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org To unsubscribe send an email to oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org To subscribe or manage your subscription click below: http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org Past archives can be viewed here: http://www.mail-archive.com/oslist@lists.openspacetech.org
Re: [OSList] Grief, Griefwork and Renewal -- The core of our work, I think
Thank you Harrison, for surprising me. I am really grateful to this wonderful piece of food you have just put in my table. So much to appreciate, so much to take away. I wish you well on this long journey of yours, so glad you often share it with us, Paul From my iPad On 27/3/2015, at 18:00, Harrison via OSList oslist@lists.openspacetech.org wrote: Grief and Griefwork are central to the human experience and evolution. To the extent that Open Space is a useful forum in which human experience and evolution may take place, both grief and Griefwork are critical elements. The process itself cannot be rushed. It will proceed at its own pace through the several phases, none of which can be skipped or short changed, for each phase contributes an essential element towards the final goal, which is renewal. No doubt grief is painful, and the process itself is, as the name implies, real work, but it is good work. In totality, and contrary to the popular perception, it is not sad. Indeed it is triumphal, even joyful, creating the way for letting go of what has ended, and leading to new life. Not bad for a day’s work! The ground breaking work describing the Griefwork Process was done by Elizabeth Kübler-Ross in her 1969 book, “On Death and Dying.” It was mind blowing. In one fell swoop she gave meaning to one of life’s most painful experiences: Grief. Yes it was, and is, a pain, but pain with genuine gain. From the terrible moments of ending, something innate draws us forward. From Shock and Anger, through Denial on to letting go and resolution. We move on. We don’t have to invent it, even think it. Happens all by itself, every time, and all the time – if we just let it. And that is a critical point... we have to let it happen. We can slow it, even abort it, but doing so leaves us in a life of grief with no resolution. Kübler-Ross’s focus was on the individual response to Death. My focus has always been on the larger agglomeration of individuals which we call organizations, what they are and how they develop and transform. And the more I thought about it, and lived deeply in the heart of many organizations, it occurred to me that Griefwork was very much present and critical. At points of ending, all sorts of endings, the process would start, sometimes with the whole organization involved. Shock/Anger, Denial, Memories, Despair, Open Space, Vision – those were my descriptors, and yes, Open Space had nothing to do with meetings. For me it was that incredible balance point between what was and what would become. I’ll spare you the details, but if you are interested it is all there in my first book, “Spirit: Transformation and Development,” which is yours for a mouse click at http://openspaceworld.com/Spirit.pdf Open Space Technology was a late comer in all of this, definitely a funny thing on the way to the future – until it began to dawn on me that everything I had experienced and described under the heading of Griefwork in Organizations showed up in that “funny thing.” Which is why I ended up calling it Open Space. “Technology” was merely an afterthought, and mostly a joke. When an organization is in deep pain caused by market shifts, corporate raiders, internal conflict, international disorder – whatever – The process of Griefwork kicks in. The initial response is shock and Anger, blame and confusion. “They did it!” “How could it happen to us?” Old ways end. New ways are much less than obvious. And the process rolls on! Should such an organization find itself sitting in a circle, creating a bulletin board... if would be fair to say that the Griefwork Process is the script of the emerging drama. Unwritten, unplanned, maybe unknown – but very much there, if you just take a moment to see. And if you have never been in such a situation, you can in fact see it in a remarkable video of USWEST, thanks to Peggy Holman. http://vimeo.com/25251316 Shortly told, the situation was that a corporate wide redesign (Process Re-Engineering) had failed massively leaving anger, frustration and confusion in its wake. In one part of the USWEST world, The State of Arizona, it had all gone critical. Somehow, Peggy Holman and her colleagues managed to bring in Open Space, which is marvelously depicted by the video. When asked to describe the course of events over the three day gathering, one participant said (in reference to the second day), “Today I think we are searching for solutions for what we were bitching about yesterday.” There it is. The passage from shock and anger onto vision and renewal. But don’t just listen to the words. The “body language” is even more compelling. In the opening circle you will see a phalanx of angry faces, arms folded, jaws set. Skip to the end and it is practically a love in. And no, we did not script it! Knowing that Griefwork is central to the fabric and
Re: [OSList] Great formats for breakout sessions?
Hi Lucas, Spot on. I have seen this happening, the energy gets wasted, specially in small OS seems that social pressures inhibits the Law of two feet. Wonder if the same happens in virtual OS, where people can actually leave the virtual rooms without any social pressure... Thanks for such well thought questions. Best Paul From my iPad On 22/3/2015, at 15:10, Lucas Cioffi via OSList oslist@lists.openspacetech.org wrote: Hi All, I checked the OST User's Guide and the OS List archives, but I didn't find any mention of what format the breakout sessions can/should take. During some but not all OS events I've attended, facilitators have mentioned that breakout sessions should be conversations rather than presentations. The OS philosophy would say there's no need to suggest how to run a breakout session and empower the participants to choose their own formats for each session and do less and it just happens. However, we all know from firsthand experience that some breakout sessions are more personally satisfying/rewarding than others, just as some 3-person coffee break conversations during normal conferences are better than others. Here are some potential problems with breakout sessions if they are implemented poorly by participants: There can be too many sub-topics for the breakout session so some ideas do not get brought up at all. Most of the time people do not brainstorm all the topics at the beginning of a session and they dive right into the discussion of the first issue that comes to mind. So they don't ever know all the topics that are on everyone's minds. Some people do no feel comfortable for various reasons related to introversion, discrimination, or office politics, so they never speak up. As facilitators, we know ways to avoid this but the participants may not know how to avoid these meeting pitfalls. One person dominates the discussion. The built-in remedy for this is that everyone else votes with their feet and leaves to form their own breakout session later, but sometimes this doesn't happen and it's simply a lost opportunity for everyone. Here are my questions for the group: 1. What formats to the breakout sessions usually take at events that you facilitate, and are some of these formats better than others in your opinion? 2. What formats could breakout sessions take? Someone usually starts with why they convened the session, but then what usually happens? What could happen? 3. What meeting tools/aides/games can help improve the quality of breakout sessions? Thank you for your insights! -- Lucas Cioffi Facilitation Community of Practice on QiqoChat Charlottesville, VA 917-528-1831 ___ OSList mailing list To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org To unsubscribe send an email to oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org To subscribe or manage your subscription click below: http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org Past archives can be viewed here: http://www.mail-archive.com/oslist@lists.openspacetech.org ___ OSList mailing list To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org To unsubscribe send an email to oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org To subscribe or manage your subscription click below: http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org Past archives can be viewed here: http://www.mail-archive.com/oslist@lists.openspacetech.org