Re: Roundabout not displaying
Certainly multipolygon is probably the wrong relation type. I,ve changed the relation type to "jnuction". This seems to have fixed the rendering issue. Thanks for your help. On Monday, 31 July 2017 20:47:25 UTC+1, Aceman444 wrote: > > Strange thing is that the ways comprising the roundabout are NOT tagged as > roundabout. But they are members of a multipolygon that has many more tags > (like maxspeed and roundabout). I'm not sure that works and is correct > tagging. I have never seen that. > > Dňa pondelok, 31. júla 2017 18:29:46 UTC+2 David Groom napísal(-a): >> >> A roundabout in the UK at 50.69634, -1.2887 is not displaying, although >> the slip roads on and off the rounabout do show. OSM will route usiung the >> roundabout, it is only the display which is wrong >> >> I cant see anything wrong with the data in OSM. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Osmand" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Roundabout not displaying
Certainly multipolygon is probably the wrong relation type. I'll try changing it and see what happens. Thanks On Monday, 31 July 2017 20:47:25 UTC+1, Aceman444 wrote: > > Strange thing is that the ways comprising the roundabout are NOT tagged as > roundabout. But they are members of a multipolygon that has many more tags > (like maxspeed and roundabout). I'm not sure that works and is correct > tagging. I have never seen that. > > Dňa pondelok, 31. júla 2017 18:29:46 UTC+2 David Groom napísal(-a): >> >> A roundabout in the UK at 50.69634, -1.2887 is not displaying, although >> the slip roads on and off the rounabout do show. OSM will route usiung the >> roundabout, it is only the display which is wrong >> >> I cant see anything wrong with the data in OSM. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Osmand" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Roundabout not displaying
Strange thing is that the ways comprising the roundabout are NOT tagged as roundabout. But they are members of a multipolygon that has many more tags (like maxspeed and roundabout). I'm not sure that works and is correct tagging. I have never seen that. Dňa pondelok, 31. júla 2017 18:29:46 UTC+2 David Groom napísal(-a): > > A roundabout in the UK at 50.69634, -1.2887 is not displaying, although > the slip roads on and off the rounabout do show. OSM will route usiung the > roundabout, it is only the display which is wrong > > I cant see anything wrong with the data in OSM. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Osmand" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: How to tell OsmAnd to ignore a missed waypoint?
Bob called in sick. There is no need to pick him up. yet the program DEMANDS that you go to his place anyway. On Monday, July 31, 2017 at 11:42:43 AM UTC-5, Kevin Kenny wrote: > > Dumb question: Does OSMand make a distinction between waypoints > having the semantics of "this is my preferred route" and ones that > have the semantics of "this trip has multiple destinations?" If indeed > you have a trip where Alice wants to stop at point P to pick up Bob, > and then proceed to their joint destination at point Q, directing back to > Bob's place after passing by it is correct and desired behaviour. > > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Mike Frisch > wrote: > >> It's (dead) simple math to determine if the direction of travel is toward >> or away from the next waypoint. Whatever waypoint is closest is the one the >> route should automatically direct to. A second, related setting would be >> "ensure route passes through all waypoints". If enabled, the route would >> always route to the missed waypoint. If disabled, routing is to the next >> closest waypoint. >> >> There is no technical reason why this feature couldn't be implemented. >> Tt's simply an issue of the author(s) not deeming the feature desirable. >> >> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 11:45 AM 'P Wat' via Osmand < >> osm...@googlegroups.com > wrote: >> >>> OsmAnd's determination to direct you back to a waypoint you missed, >>> either deliberately or accidentally, is indeed an irritation. Previous >>> contributors have noted that circumstances (eg traffic) do not always allow >>> the luxury of stopping to make corrections on-the-run. Being >>> constantly directed back to a missed waypoint renders the rest of the route >>> useless. >>> Paul Johnson and Jan Van Bekkum's suggestions are helpful. >>> IMHO it would be useful to be offered the option to "Re-route to the >>> missed waypoint", or "Delete the missed waypoint and continue to the next", >>> or "Skip the missed waypoint but keep it on screen to use later". >>> Paul W >>> >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the >>> Google Groups "Osmand" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/osmand/NzlJ5HNTfcM/unsubscribe. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to >>> osmand+un...@googlegroups.com . >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Osmand" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to osmand+un...@googlegroups.com . >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Osmand" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
osmand+ shows square empty boxes instead of symbols
Hi all, my osmand+ shows just white square boxes, rounded corners, different border colors, where I would expect symbols and icons. Any idea what got messed up here and how to fix it? Can I just remove and reinstall it for this paid version? Thanks, Martin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Osmand" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Buy & Use Osmand+ and Addons without Google Play Store
Hello Community, I run my Android phone (Cyanogen, rooted) without Google or Amazon Software (and I want to keep it that way for privacy concerns). I know paid apps like Titanium Backup can be activated (upgraded top premium) with a licence file purchased online and then placed in a certain folder. Is there any possibility to get osmand+ and the contour lines addon workind without Amazon or Google store? F-Droid is fine. Any help is very much appreciated :) Kind regards, Hans -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Osmand" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Routing to Correct Side of Building
IMHO, the standard "last mile" mode should be switching to manual "Look att map, look around and decide - you are already there." Automated solution can be easily tricked and the effect is not worthy the effort. Dne 31/07/2017 v 20:22 Jeff napsal(a): > Thanks, thats interesting about the centroid. Routers could, in > principle, instead choose the road that's closest to the outline of > the building. In many cases, that would be different road selection > than the centroid. I wish there was some recommended standard all > routers used for selecting the correct access road to a building. It > would avoid conflicting OSM edits based on how a specific router uses > the map data. Maybe a topic to start with the more general OSM community. -- Poutnik ( The Wanderer ) My Brouter profiles https://github.com/poutnikl/Brouter-profiles/wiki -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Osmand" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Routing to Correct Side of Building
Thanks, thats interesting about the centroid. Routers could, in principle, instead choose the road that's closest to the outline of the building. In many cases, that would be different road selection than the centroid. I wish there was some recommended standard all routers used for selecting the correct access road to a building. It would avoid conflicting OSM edits based on how a specific router uses the map data. Maybe a topic to start with the more general OSM community. On Sunday, July 30, 2017 at 10:16:40 PM UTC-5, Jack Burke wrote: > > If it's a building, I think it tries to route to the road closest to the > centroid of the building. If the destination is a node in a building, then > to the road nearest the node. > > > On Thursday, July 20, 2017 at 11:06:47 AM UTC-4, Jeff wrote: >> >> Maybe i shouldnt have mentioned the parking as that adds an extra layer >> to the simpler problem I'm trying to understand. In any case, whether one >> is in a car, on foot, etc, they should be routed to the side of the >> building with an entrance. Does OsmAnd attempt to route to entrance nodes? >> If so, why in this case does it not work? If the app ignores entrance >> nodes, or if an entrance node has not been placed, what other cues on the >> map does the app use to choose to choose which side of a building to route >> to? > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Osmand" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Zooming out (2-mile limit?)
Thank you! Works a dream. On Monday, 31 July 2017 18:30:42 UTC+1, db1...@comcast.net wrote: > > > > On Monday, July 31, 2017 at 11:31:05 AM UTC-5, Marc Lopatin wrote: >> >> Hi there, I cannot view an offline map when zooming out more than >> 2-miles. Displays 5-mile scale as a blank page and then reverts to 200m. >> Anyone knoiw of a fix? Thanks, Marc >> > > I am a new user and had this problem. The solution is to download World > Base Map. Osmand apparently switches to this map when you get to 5 miles. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Osmand" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Zooming out (2-mile limit?)
On Monday, July 31, 2017 at 11:31:05 AM UTC-5, Marc Lopatin wrote: > > Hi there, I cannot view an offline map when zooming out more than 2-miles. > Displays 5-mile scale as a blank page and then reverts to 200m. Anyone > knoiw of a fix? Thanks, Marc > I am a new user and had this problem. The solution is to download World Base Map. Osmand apparently switches to this map when you get to 5 miles. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Osmand" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: How to tell OsmAnd to ignore a missed waypoint?
Dumb question: Does OSMand make a distinction between waypoints having the semantics of "this is my preferred route" and ones that have the semantics of "this trip has multiple destinations?" If indeed you have a trip where Alice wants to stop at point P to pick up Bob, and then proceed to their joint destination at point Q, directing back to Bob's place after passing by it is correct and desired behaviour. On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Mike Frisch wrote: > It's (dead) simple math to determine if the direction of travel is toward > or away from the next waypoint. Whatever waypoint is closest is the one the > route should automatically direct to. A second, related setting would be > "ensure route passes through all waypoints". If enabled, the route would > always route to the missed waypoint. If disabled, routing is to the next > closest waypoint. > > There is no technical reason why this feature couldn't be implemented. > Tt's simply an issue of the author(s) not deeming the feature desirable. > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 11:45 AM 'P Wat' via Osmand < > osmand@googlegroups.com> wrote: > >> OsmAnd's determination to direct you back to a waypoint you missed, >> either deliberately or accidentally, is indeed an irritation. Previous >> contributors have noted that circumstances (eg traffic) do not always allow >> the luxury of stopping to make corrections on-the-run. Being constantly >> directed back to a missed waypoint renders the rest of the route useless. >> Paul Johnson and Jan Van Bekkum's suggestions are helpful. >> IMHO it would be useful to be offered the option to "Re-route to the >> missed waypoint", or "Delete the missed waypoint and continue to the next", >> or "Skip the missed waypoint but keep it on screen to use later". >> Paul W >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the >> Google Groups "Osmand" group. >> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/ >> topic/osmand/NzlJ5HNTfcM/unsubscribe. >> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to >> osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Osmand" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Osmand" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Zooming out (2-mile limit?)
Hi there, I cannot view an offline map when zooming out more than 2-miles. Displays 5-mile scale as a blank page and then reverts to 200m. Anyone knoiw of a fix? Thanks, Marc -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Osmand" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: How to tell OsmAnd to ignore a missed waypoint?
It's (dead) simple math to determine if the direction of travel is toward or away from the next waypoint. Whatever waypoint is closest is the one the route should automatically direct to. A second, related setting would be "ensure route passes through all waypoints". If enabled, the route would always route to the missed waypoint. If disabled, routing is to the next closest waypoint. There is no technical reason why this feature couldn't be implemented. Tt's simply an issue of the author(s) not deeming the feature desirable. On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 11:45 AM 'P Wat' via Osmand wrote: > OsmAnd's determination to direct you back to a waypoint you missed, either > deliberately or accidentally, is indeed an irritation. Previous > contributors have noted that circumstances (eg traffic) do not always allow > the luxury of stopping to make corrections on-the-run. Being constantly > directed back to a missed waypoint renders the rest of the route useless. > Paul Johnson and Jan Van Bekkum's suggestions are helpful. > IMHO it would be useful to be offered the option to "Re-route to the > missed waypoint", or "Delete the missed waypoint and continue to the next", > or "Skip the missed waypoint but keep it on screen to use later". > Paul W > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "Osmand" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/osmand/NzlJ5HNTfcM/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Osmand" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Sea navigation markers not showing
>George BW I have an interest in this - Did you resovle it? Paul W On Wednesday, July 12, 2017 at 10:52:10 PM UTC+1, George B-W wrote: > > Channel markers we call them here in Australia. I'm looking at the Gold > Coast broadwater. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Osmand" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: How to tell OsmAnd to ignore a missed waypoint?
OsmAnd's determination to direct you back to a waypoint you missed, either deliberately or accidentally, is indeed an irritation. Previous contributors have noted that circumstances (eg traffic) do not always allow the luxury of stopping to make corrections on-the-run. Being constantly directed back to a missed waypoint renders the rest of the route useless. Paul Johnson and Jan Van Bekkum's suggestions are helpful. IMHO it would be useful to be offered the option to "Re-route to the missed waypoint", or "Delete the missed waypoint and continue to the next", or "Skip the missed waypoint but keep it on screen to use later". Paul W -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Osmand" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Default measurement units
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 4:21 AM, wrote: > On Thursday, 27 July 2017 10:10:39 UTC+1, Roger CO wrote: >> >> Apologies if this is an faq (it should be) but a search here isn't giving >> an answer. How can I force osmand to use kilometers and metres as the >> default measurement units. At present every time I start it it flips back >> to miles which is a right royal pain. (yes I am in the UK but prefer to use >> km for cycling) >> Thanks, RogerCO > > > Go to Settings -> General Settings -> Driving Region -> select either > India or Japan (left-hand driving but with sane units) > > A "nice-to-have" would be to change this to just drive-on-left/right and metric/imperial. Eliminates weird edge cases like people in the US more comfortable with metric, Americans in Canada, mainland Europeans in the UK, etc... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Osmand" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
