Re: campaign

2001-08-07 Thread DL Staff



On ya Barb!!!

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Greg 
   Barb Cook 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 1:38 
  PM
  Subject: campaign
  
  
  I tookLiz's motion to the local ALP branch meeting 
  last night and itis to be passed to State QLD, Federal, Health  
  shadow health ministers, attorney generals ( branch suggestion), local pollies 
  and as a motion to the Oct QLD ALP women's conference. This will start the 
  ball rolling from my local area.
  We need a standard background to this motion to attach when 
  they are sent to these places?A background will explain the motion more 
  eloquently and if it is the same it will be consistent. We should be seen to 
  be organised and consistent.
  
  We have a local issue as well which I used last night in the 
  debate.
  I work at the local maternity hospital just north of 
  Brisbane about 40km away. We used to have 4 private OB's on the peninsula. Two 
  have now stopped private obstetrics, leaving this to very aging obstetricians 
  due to increased PI costs being a concern so I heard ( :- ). This has reduced 
  women's access to private obstetric care but wait there is more!  The 
  local Private hospital has closed its maternity section.
  At a time when federal health policies have pushed families 
  to private cover many women are now finding that now they are pregnant the 
  closest private maternityunit is approx. 40km south-east 
  orto Lynne's to the north (approx 90km away. Some choice if they chose 
  private care! If they could access midwives as primary care givers that will 
  provide them with another alternative!
  
  The debate was brisk and people were amazed. The support was 
  strong. One experienced person (anti-nuke protester against a proposed local 
  irradiation plant) asked why I couldn't go to the local media. I had to 
  explain "Code of conduct" guidelines for public sector employees prevented me 
  from doing so. Several people have now offered to write letters to pollies, 
  editors and anything else needed. I felt pleased that the response was so 
  positive.
  
  Cheers Barb


Re: centralised EFM.

2001-08-07 Thread Carol Thorogood


Hi all
Yes I am still around, just ever so quiet!  Does anyone have any info or
know where I can get it or does anyone have experience with centralised EFM
in 'delivery' suites?  I need to know about the sorts of EFM where there is
a console in the office or somewhere to which all the fetal monitors are
linked up. Apparently the monitor 'reads' the EFM and the screen goes red if
the trace goes off. The mid students and I have done literature searches and
can't find anything about its efficacy. Help, please.

Carol

PS That's a loverly mat coalition website Joy.

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.



guthrie at breast

2001-08-07 Thread Kirsten Blacker

Has anyone forwarded this question to Lactnet? They might have some 
interesting input on the effect of unpleasant tests whilst BF in the early 
days.
Kirsten


_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.



not from me

2001-08-07 Thread Janet Ireland



Its the middle of the night and i've turned on to 
look up aclinical problem [potters syndrome]that is keeping me awake and this 
list tells me Ihave sent just now 4 e-mails 1 from spiritual midwifery another 
aabout primal theraphy and one about starting up a home business also an e-mail 
keeps reappearing that Isent days ago re guthrie what's going on . 

Also there are replies about the guthrie with 
attachments do not open as i am supicious Iam just going to update my virus 
check any ideas about whats happening lol jan


Re: centralised EFM.

2001-08-07 Thread DL Staff

Ho Carol - good to know you are still out there! Another reason not to be
with or to touch the woman. There was a woman I was speaking to the other
day and  she was unhappy about the fact that when she went to her ob, he
literally never laid his hands on her - Scanned her belly, did her BP and
that was it. She wondered if he thought she had girl germs (as my sons
would say). Regards, Lynne
- Original Message -
From: Carol Thorogood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ozmidwifery List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 9:45 PM
Subject: Re: centralised EFM.



 Hi all
 Yes I am still around, just ever so quiet!  Does anyone have any info or
 know where I can get it or does anyone have experience with centralised
EFM
 in 'delivery' suites?  I need to know about the sorts of EFM where there
is
 a console in the office or somewhere to which all the fetal monitors are
 linked up. Apparently the monitor 'reads' the EFM and the screen goes red
if
 the trace goes off. The mid students and I have done literature searches
and
 can't find anything about its efficacy. Help, please.

 Carol

 PS That's a loverly mat coalition website Joy.

 --
 This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
 Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.



Re: centralised EFM.

2001-08-07 Thread Robin Moon

Hi Carol,

Try contacting the private hospital maternity units. I know the Sydney Adventist 
Hospital and North
Shore Private have the consoles where you can read a trace from another source. You 
could even set
them up to read whilst up at the bedside of another patient.

They were excellent at reducing the motivation to actually go into a labouring woman's 
room! Why
bother? The legal system is busy telling us the ctg is 'neccesary' for quality patient 
care, so
there we are... I would say efficacy is reduced, not increased. :-)

Also , try Corometrics. I saw their display on a conference at the weekend and they 
were displaying
exactly that, the multi system screen.

Robin

- Original Message -
From: Carol Thorogood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ozmidwifery List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 9:45 PM
Subject: Re: centralised EFM.



 Hi all
 Yes I am still around, just ever so quiet!  Does anyone have any info or
 know where I can get it or does anyone have experience with centralised EFM
 in 'delivery' suites?  I need to know about the sorts of EFM where there is
 a console in the office or somewhere to which all the fetal monitors are
 linked up. Apparently the monitor 'reads' the EFM and the screen goes red if
 the trace goes off. The mid students and I have done literature searches and
 can't find anything about its efficacy. Help, please.

 Carol

 PS That's a loverly mat coalition website Joy.

 --
 This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
 Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.



Re: Twin policies.

2001-08-07 Thread Jenny Parratt

I too have attended a twin birth at home. The mother is a midwife known to
some on this list. The twins are about 5 years old now. The day before she
went into labour the latest MIDIRS arrived with a summary of research or
meta-analysis (can't quite remember) that reported the safety of waiting for
the second twin. (must have been mid to late 1996). This wonderful woman (it
was her 4th pregnancy) laboured for 6 hours before the first twin was born.
That article spurred my confidence to be patient while (with healthy foetal
heart, good position and healthy, confident mum) we waited 6 more hours for
the labour to gradually build again. She gave birth to twin 2 through the
water, catching her baby herself. Jenny Parratt


Jenny Parratt
Independent Midwife Consultant
PO Mandurang Vic 3551 Australia
0409 393073
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Mary Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Robin Moon [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 10:30 PM
Subject: Re: Twin policies.


 Dear Robin, I can't help you with hospital policies as I am a homebirth
 midwife(at least up until 31 August).  My mother was a midwife before she
 married and when I was going out to an isolated farm 15 yrs ago to be with
a
 woman in labour whoom  I suspected had twins, but no proof as no U/S
 available, My mum said.. don't worry Mary, just give the second baby time
 to come down.. it takes 20-30 minutes.  DONT fiddle with the second one...
 it will be alright.  I did as she said and the woman birthed both her
twins
 in the hands and knees position.. with 20 minutes in between.  I have been
 with mothers birthing twins since (in a hospital unit with supportive
Obst.
 outside the door) and I have alsways followed her principles.  In one of
the
 cases, the second twin took 40 mins to arrive.  I just kept intemittantly
 monitoring the second twin while the mother breast fed the first.  Hope
this
 helps, altho I KNOW he will want random controlled trial results.  Cheers,
 Mary M

 --
 This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
 Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.



Re: not from me

2001-08-07 Thread TinaPettigrew

In a message dated 8/08/01 4:56:38 AM AUS Eastern Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Its the middle of the night and i've turned on to look up aclinical 
problem [potters syndrome]that is keeping me awake and this list tells me 
Ihave sent just now 4 e-mails 1 from spiritual midwifery another aabout 
primal theraphy and one about starting up a home business also an e-mail 
keeps reappearing that Isent days ago re guthrie  what's going on . 
 Also there are replies about the guthrie with attachments do not open as i 
am supicious Iam just going to update my virus check any ideas about whats 
happening lol jan
  

HI Jan,

I too have been getting some very obscure emails with attachments. They are 
virused. I have had a friend here all weekend sorting out my contaminated 
computer system, which fell victim to a virus last week. Nasty little bug - 
immediately it began working its way through my system and corrupting files. 
The way it works (in my limited understanding) is that the virus comes in 
form of an email with an attachment. It usually appears from someone Eg: list 
member who you will recognise - hence the temptation to open it. The way it 
sucks you in is it usually begins with some text you have sent off to someone 
else, then with the words Take a look to the attachment at the end. The 
virus propagates by corrupting your address book and copying the emails and 
sending them off to everyone in your address book. That's why you may be 
seeing emails that you did not send !! Clever isn't it!!

I purchased some Norton antivirus 2001 software over the net 
(http://www.symantec.com/nav/nav_9xnt/) cost me $39-95 US - about $75- AUS. 
Cheap insurance for what it could potentially cost should these damn viruses 
trash your hard disk!!! It was a very easy process (If I can do it anyone 
can) and now this software reads and scans all my incoming email for viruses, 
isolates them if it finds some, and automatically runs live updates for 
current virus definitions from the net as I work on the Internet with 
interrupting me. When I'm off line it then goes to work scanning my hard disk 
for viruses with the recent definitions its just downloaded. I feel a little 
safer now.

Yours in birth,
Tina Pettigrew
Birthworks
Independent CBE and aspiring B.Mid Midwife.
Convenor, Aust B. Mid Student Collective.

 As we trust the flowers to open to new life
   - So we can trust birth
Harriette Hartigan.
--- 
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.



Re: Guthrie's at the breast

2001-08-07 Thread Julie Clarke
Title: Re: Guthrie's at the breast




Hello all,
Regarding Guthries at breast.
I remember years ago a 
breastfeeding counsellor voicing her frustration to me about this practice which 
is usually done on day 5 the day of discharge from hospital and she explained 
that day 6 it's common for breastfeeding counsellors to receive a call from a 
mum saying my baby was feeding ok until we left hospital. She then went 
onto explain to me that after questioning the mums that this will often coincide 
with rough handling during the guthries with a very distressed baby at the 
breast.
The counsellor suggested that to remedy the situation for mum 
and bub she would often recommend to have a bath with the baby getting the baby 
nice and warm and relaxed and offering it the breast for a recovery 
breastfeed. She claimed that this often worked. The baby has the 
opportunity to re-discover the breast under relaxed pleasant conditions at home 
in their own bathroom.
I guess it depends on the midwife doing it - if its reasonably 
gentle and baby ok maybe breastfeeding at the same time would be ok - 

hug to all
Julie


-Original Message-From: 
Rhonda [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; 
Jackie Mawson [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: 
Tuesday, 7 August 2001 10:57Subject: Re: Guthrie's at the 
breast
More useless but interesting information 
--

Just a note on the larynx point you made Jackie 
- the speach thing and choking is because at the age of about 18months to 2 
years the human larynx drops about an inch and a half to two inches 
allowingthe development of speach and also allowing us to choke. 
This does not drop in monkeys (chimps etc etc) That is why they can't 
talk and we can. 

Therefore, speachbecomes more 
understandable at the age of 18months to 2 years and the voice becomes 
clearer. Have you noticed that at about 18months the words 
suddenly become clearer and the voice changes? - prior to this 
drop in position it is harder for an infant to vocalise with words and very 
hard to choke (not impossible but unlikely.) 

Also, anewborn also does not breath 
through the mouth this is to prevent aspiration of milk when learning to 
feed. Babies breath through their nose until at least a week old often 
older before they learn or are able to breath through their 
mouth. (That is what we were taught)


Rhonda.




- Original Message - 
From: 
Jackie Mawson 
To: Ozmidwifery List 
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 
10:28 AM
Subject: Re: Guthrie's at the 
breast

Just wondering if anybody 
out there is aware of any information on performing guthries on the 
babies whilst they are at the 
breast.It 
is the best way, as far as Mother and child are concerned. As far as I 
know, babies are very unlikely to aspirate when they are newborn. 
It is only when they get older and start talking that aspiration becomes 
more of a problem  Chimpanzees, gorillas, etc, never choke 
(even as infants) but they also never talk. The tendency for humans to 
choke has something to do with the ability we have to talk (larger 
larynx?) and we have a protective mechanism when very small to help 
avoid this happening  thats why small children have tiny, 
high pitched voices, that develop as they grow.Anyway, I 
dont think aspiration is an issue. And doing Guthrie's while 
breastfeeding is just so much less traumatic for mother and baby (I 
know, I insisted on it for my 3rd child  the other 2 I 
didnt know about it).Birthing Beautifully,Jackie 
Mawson.Convenor of Birthrites: Healing After Caesarean 
Inc.Visit our Website at: http://www.birthrites.orgEmail: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Phone: 61 08 9418 8949Please note I am 
not a Professional Healthcare Provider, and all opinions given in this 
email are not to be taken as medical, or legal, advice. Please seek such 
advice from the relevant professional service.Email me your 
postal details for a FREE copy of our quarterly magazine, if you live 
within Australia - Overseas postage costs are above budget, 
sorry!Too many 
Gods;so 
many 
creeds,Too 
many 
pathsthat 
wind 
andwind,When 
just the 
artof 
being 
kindIs 
all the 
sadworld 
needs...-- 



common knowledge

2001-08-07 Thread Sally Westbury

can someone point me to where this video book is on the internet please.

Sally
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.



Women And Birth Matters

2001-08-07 Thread Roslyn Donnellan - Fernandez
Title: 29’th May 2001  
 Roslyn Donnellan – Fernandez








29’th May 2001    Roslyn
Donnellan – Fernandez

 
7 Mulga Road

Jenny Macklin   HAWTHORNDENE 5051

Federal Shadow Health Minister

ALP



Dear Jenny



WOMEN AND BIRTH MATTERS



Please find enclosed some briefing materials on current maternity
issues from groups such as:



AMALG  (Australian Midwives Act
Lobby Group)

Maternity Coalition  (National
Consumer Consortium)

AMAP  (Australian Midwifery
Action Project)



For your interest / information, I have also enclosed a recently
published paper on my personal view and experience of midwifery practice in
Australia.



The woman and midwives of Australia are mobilising for change in the
way maternity services are funded and organized in this country.



The Federal Senate Inquiry Into Childbirth Procedures (Rocking The
Cradle 1999) followed a decade of state and national reports recommending
change in childbirth options for women in this country. These reports continue
to gather dust on forgotten shelves, and outcomes and care options for
indigenous women and babies remain a national disgrace.



I would appreciate an outline of specific ALP initiatives, policy and
action in relation to the issues of:



*  Reform to maternity funding
that enables all Australian women access, equity and 

    choice of midwifery led care
in the public and private sectors;



*  Funding and legislative initiatives
that address national midwifery education and 

    labourforce requirements. (MIDWIFERY entails a discrete practice and is a 

   
profession recognized by the World Health Organization as providing the 

  
SAFEST, MOST COST EFFECTIVE CARE FOR THE MAJORITY 

  
of  pregnant women and their
babies. Inclusion and consideration of midwifery

   with “nursing issues” is
confusing and inappropriate);



*  Childbirth outcomes, care
options, and educational opportunities for persons of  

    aboriginal and Torres Strait
Island origin to undertake midwifery studies.



Looking forward to your response and policy statements.



Yours sincerely



Roslyn Donnellan - Fernandez








Birth Rally / Lobbying / National Women's Organisations

2001-08-07 Thread Roslyn Donnellan - Fernandez
Title: Good afternoon








Good afternoon



My name is Roz Donnellan – Fernandez. 
I am a mother, and I vote.

I have been a midwife and a birth activist for the past 8 years and I
support women’s choice in childbirth.



As a self employed community midwife during this time I have provided
continuity of midwifery care for many women and their families in South
Australian homes, hospitals and community settings during pregnancy, birth and
postnatally.



I choose to work in this way because research shows that continuity of
midwifery care is THE GOLD STANDARD, THE BLUE RIBBON STANDARD of care for 

ALL BIRTHING WOMEN AND THEIR BABIES.



The World Health Organization states the midwife to be the safest, most
cost effective provider for the majority of pregnant women and their babies,
including assessment of risk status, and irregardless of place of birth.



One of the few ways in which families can currently access continuity
of midwife led care  homebirth services is by contracting a self employed
midwife. This occurs because successive governments in this state and this
country have 

FAILED TO ACTION INTERNATIONALLY RECOGNIZED BEST PRACTICE IN MATERNITY
CARE  MIDWIFERY LED CARE, despite well over a decade of reports calling
for major NATIONAL REFORM TO IMPLEMENT THESE SERVICES.



Currently families pay from their own pockets to access midwifery led
services. There is NO MEDICARE REBATE and private health insurance funds will
not rebate midwives if professional indemnification arrangements are not in
place. 

SO MUCH FOR CLOSING THE GAP !



Over the past 8 years, paying families in my solo midwifery practice
have saved the public health system well in excess of $ 250, 000. This is a
conservative estimate  far in excess of my own renumeration.



Last month the insurance company that managed indemnification for
midwives nationally withdrew the option for them to renew their policies with
two weeks notice. A replacement insurer has not been found. This action has
left self employed midwives and the families they serve in crisis. It is an
action that further diminishes Australian families birth options for midwife
continuity of care, and an action that threatens to extinguish access to SAFE
HOMEBIRTH.



This is a national problem, as well as a problem for each state and
territory.



Last year the SA Department of Human Services provided a RECOMMENDATION

AND ENDORSEMENT FOR MY MIDWIFERY PRACTICE IN ANY SOUTH AUSTRALIAN
PUBLIC HOSPITAL subject to individual Board approvals. For midwives and nurses
to access and utilize public hospital facilities it is a requirement that they
carry appropriate professional indemnification.



The Department and the Minister therefore have a SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
to ensure that professional indemnification arrangements are accessible to ALL
MIDWIVES AND NURSES. One way to tackle this issue in SA would be to offer
indemnity arrangements for self employed midwives through SGIC.



Without appropriate arrangements there are two alternatives:



* Self employed midwives cease their clinical practices, 

   (as a criterion of
accreditation with the National Australian College of Midwives Inc

    is that they carry such
cover), OR,



* The midwives continue to practice without accreditation, and without
professional

   indemnity insurance. This
means they will not be able to birth women in hospital,

   access essential services,
and more importantly, THAT FAMILIES WILL NOT BE

   RECOMPENSED IN THE EVENT OF
AN ADVERSE OUTCOME.



MATERNITY CARE IN AUSTRALIA IS IN CRISIS.



The Australian Institute of Health  Welfare identified shortages
of midwives in all Australian States  Territories in 1998. The crisis in
premiums for obstetric care has also resulted in many obstetricians and GPs
withdrawing their services in this area.



In 1999 the Senate Community Affairs Committee produced a report
entitled 

Rocking The Cradle, recommending changes in childbirth that have been

IGNORED BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AS NOT A FEDERAL RESPONSIBILITY!



WHOSE RESPONSIBILITY THEN IS IT ?



This issue is not about place of birth. If it was then on the evidence
PI insurance should be lowest for those midwives attending women with
uncomplicated pregnancy’s  births at home.



This issue is not about safety, or evidence based practice. If it was
then the majority of both obstetricians and midwives would be salaried through
the public sector and midwifery led care would be the gold standard and the
norm for quality maternity provision in this state and country.



This issue is not about responsible governance, or equity and access to

“health for all Australian families.” If it was, successive governments
would have implemented a no fault liability scheme years ago. New Zealand has
had one for 30 years !



This issue, like so many others that involve the health  well
being of women  children is about MONEY AND POWER.



It is about every women’s right in Australia to access  equity in

RE: centralised EFM.

2001-08-07 Thread Johnston

Good to hear from you Carol.
You're asking for efficacy of the monitor?  It just means there doesn't 
have to be a midwife in the room with the woman, doesn't it?
I saw the central monitor bank system in use in Michigan in about 95.  Went 
back to visit the hospital where 3 of mine had been born (and where the 
birth activist was born, I think).  The OB nurse told me that if a baby was 
about to be born, and the doctor was not present, no nurse would stay in 
the room with a woman - they couldn't take that sort of responsibility.  I 
feel great sadness at that thought.  We mustn't let that happen here.
Joy
-Original Message-
From:   Carol Thorogood [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Tuesday, August 07, 2001 9:45 PM
To: Ozmidwifery List
Subject:Re: centralised EFM.


Hi all
Yes I am still around, just ever so quiet!  Does anyone have any info or
know where I can get it or does anyone have experience with centralised EFM
in 'delivery' suites?  I need to know about the sorts of EFM where there is
a console in the office or somewhere to which all the fetal monitors are
linked up. Apparently the monitor 'reads' the EFM and the screen goes red 
if
the trace goes off. The mid students and I have done literature searches 
and
can't find anything about its efficacy. Help, please.

Carol

PS That's a loverly mat coalition website Joy.

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.



C/S rate to be proud of

2001-08-07 Thread Ammonger
Also in e-news:


A great effort has been made to reduce cesarean section rates at
Princess Basma Teaching Hospital in North Jordan. With an annual
delivery rate of about 8250, the hospital has worked to decrease its
cesarean section rate from 13.5% to 6.5%. The rate has been almost
constant since then. In 1987, cephalopelvic disproportion and fetal
distress were responsible for nearly 65% of cesarean section rates;
this rate dropped to about 30% in 1990. This decrease is due to the
change in the approach to management of the two conditions. The
reduction in cesarean section rates in the four-year period was
associated with a drop in the perinatal mortality rate, showing that
cesarean section rates can be reduced without increasing the perinatal
mortality rate. Ann Saudi Med 1995; 15(1):29-31 
http://www.kfshrc.edu.sa/annals/151/93303.html for the entire study 





What every midwife should know about VBAC

2001-08-07 Thread Ammonger
Go to http://www.midwiferytoday.com/articles/default.asp?t=acog
to find out if you don't already know, Angela