Re: [ozmidwifery] Fwd: Endosring NMAP

2002-09-12 Thread Lois Wattis



Dear Deb - I'm sure I've done it already, but could you 
please confirm? Regards, Lois

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 4:39 
  PM
  Subject: [ozmidwifery] Fwd: Endosring 
  NMAP
  Oh and I forgot - when endorsing NMAP, could you please 
  state whether you are endorsing as a consumer, midwife, GP, CBE (or whatever) 
  ?ThanksDebbie SlaterPerth, WA 



Re: [ozmidwifery] Fwd: Endosring NMAP

2002-09-12 Thread DebSlater
Lois

I don't have you down, so could you just confirm by reply to this email that you have endorsed?

Thanks

Debbie 


[ozmidwifery] Maternal Alienation Forum - Adelaide event plus other things (long)

2002-09-12 Thread Heartlogic




Hi 
Everyone!

Thought Adelaide people may be 
interestedin this event (at the end of the e-mail). There are so many 
issues and things of great interest to respond to on the list at the 
moment,so much to comment on...

In a nutshell,

Hi Ric and Maria Helena, great to have youwith us, people 
like you give meGREAT hope :-) if there's two like you, there 
mustbe moreand once we get the critical mass 
:-)

Vicki, the poster is stunning. You and Nic are doing such magic 
work. Brings tears to my eyes, doesn't that baby's facejust say it all? 
:-) I want 50 and I'll put themup all over the place - I'll email you 
separately about that.For those of you who haven't seen 
it, Vicki and Nic's film (and that songyou wrote Vicki - it's so haunting, 
I find myself humming iteverywhere) is stunning too. I recommend it 
to anyone who cares about women and babies and wants a bit of inspiration :-) 


Re: insurance and 
Victoria...WHAT. Isn't it amazing that the govt aren't changing the rules 
to assist with ensuring women's choices are available, not to mention people's 
right to choose the sort of work environment they want to work in. To 
deregister Now that's worthy of more letter writing. 


Re: the woman who had a caesarian 
for breech when the baby was cephalic. I wonder if the position of the baby was 
checked on admission? I've noticed a bit of a trend towards no palpation, 
just "slap the CTG on and let technology do it's thing" happening.And of 
course, ultrasound isused so much instead of palpation by our medical 
colleagues. Palpation, like other body centered things becoming a bit of a lost 
art, have others noticed that trend? Did I read that the woman was 
NESB?I can't help but wonder about the consent, explanations, debriefing 
etc. It's such a tragedy, the whole thing. 


And then ultrasound, great to see 
the research catching up with concerns and observations.Isn't it 
interesting how perceptions and orientations influences the way one 
observes? The movement (of the fetus being exposed to ultrasound) being 
constructed as 'liking it"or "not liking it" depending on one's perspective. One 
of my big concerns has always been what does it do to oocytes? Given that 
females have the full complement of eggs from early gestation and given that the 
sound waves interrupt DNA, my paranoia is wondering what effect that will have 
several generations on. Fertility is decreasing as it is...so maybe it is a good 
form of population control? When you think of the symbolism inherent in 
the vaginal probe ultrasoundbecoming such a "toy of the boys" it's 
chilling. 

And then dating? Sigh, what 
happened to the Bell Curve? 

Love the parable Vicki. Where did 
you say the shop was? I'm tending the garden for the seeds :-) Roll 
on NMAP!

in solidarity (I love that 
Justine!) Carolyn Hastie


and now the message from 
Adelaide, I've taken off the flyer for the list, if you are interested, 
email me direct and I'll send it to you. My e-mail address is [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
CH

-Original 
Message-From: Ahern, Liz 
(LSC) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, 12 September 2002 10:25 
AMTo: Moore, Kay (LSC); 
Mertin, Peter (LSC)Cc: 
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: [sawomen] FW: message to be sent 
to all of community health

Are 
you interested in exploring the impact of domestic violence and child sexual 
abuse on the relationship between mothers and their children? Do you want to 
hear about, and perhaps also explore how you can become involved in a project 
that will further develop ways of working with women and childrensubjected 
to violence? Then consider attending thisForum and Launch of the Maternal 
Alienation Project on 30 September. See the attached Flyer for 
details.

For 
bookings or enquiries, ring Women's Health Statewide - 8239 9600 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED].

Anne 
Morris
Senior 
Project Officer
Women's 
Health Statewide
www.whs.sa.gov.au
64 
Pennington Terrace
North 
Adelaide SA 
5006


[ozmidwifery] NMAP Support

2002-09-12 Thread Sandra J. Eales



Fellow NMAP Supporters

There was a very positive response from my local 
ALP branch when we discussed the NMAP this evening and it will be endorsed by 
the branch atour next meeting. The branch will also put it up as an 
agenda item at the next regional meeting of delegates.

Sandra
(Mareeba)



Re: [ozmidwifery] Bendigo midwife

2002-09-12 Thread Leisa Smith




Are there any Vic or NSW midwives able to attend 
a homebirth in Albury. Mother is 14weeks pregnant, with her third baby. 

Leisa

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-From: 
Andrea Quanchi [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Cc: 
Helen Sandner [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: 
Sunday, 8 September 2002 11:03Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Bendigo 
midwife
Mary, 
I am in Echuca, one hour from bendigo but know Helen Sanderson is practicing 
in Bendigo. I don't know if she is on the list but I will cc this to 
herAndrea QuanchiOn Saturday, September 7, 2002, at 03:29 PM, 
Mary Murphy wrote:
Is there a midwife practicing in homebirth in the Bendigo 
area? Is there a midwife /birth centre combination practice in 
Bendigo. If not, whats the other best option? thanks, 
Mary M


[ozmidwifery] Poster Prices

2002-09-12 Thread Vicki Chan
Title: Message



Dear 
all...

We 
still have about 1000 posters. When we can get it there (computer misbehaving) 
Andrea and Maternity Alliance will display the poster on their sites...As we 
dont want to spend our whole lives at the post office, we'd be happier if folk 
ordered 50 or more at a time and then distributed but under special 
circumstances we will... the cost goes up per poster as the number goes down 
because of packaging and postage...eg for a cylinder $1.55 and postage $3 for 
one poster! Ugh. Anyone who wants to order or ask questions, please email me 
personally... [EMAIL PROTECTED] 


200 posters = $100.00 including 
PP
100 
posters = $ 55.00 including PP
50 posters = $ 30.00 including 
PP
20 posters= $15.00 
including PP
10posters= $10.00 
including PP
 1 poster = $ 
5.00 including PP


Although the hours we put in were astonishing, we are very happy to have 
created these posters for ''the cause'' ( blessings upon the family who donated 
their photo!) We'll be glad to see the postersoff to new homes gracing the 
walls of universities, birth suites, community noticeboards...and who knows 
where.We have been inspired by the process and have lots more ideas for 
projects (some that may even make a profit ...LOL)

Stay 
tuned

With 
Love and Hope

Vicki 
and Nic








  


Re: [ozmidwifery] Fwd: Endosring NMAP

2002-09-12 Thread DebSlater
Sheena

My email address is as above. No I didn't send an attachment - must check that, although my virus checker is up to date.

When endorsing, can you also let me know whether you are endorsing as a consumer, midwife etc. Many thanks

Debbie 


Re: [ozmidwifery] Endosring NMAP

2002-09-12 Thread Denise Hynd



I hereby endorse NMAP
Denise Hynd
midwife

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 6:34 
  PM
  Subject: [ozmidwifery] Endosring 
  NMAP
  Can I encourage people to endorse NMAP. Some of you 
  may have been going to, but just haven't got round to doing it.Well, 
  I'm coordinating the NMAP endorsements, and we will be finalising the list by 
  the end of next week in time for the launch - although I'm sure will be 
  updating the list after that.If any of you want to endorse it, just 
  paste the following statement into an email, and email it to me, with your 
  name and city/ town and state of residence. Couldn't be easier 
  :-)"I hereby endorse the National Maternity Action Plan"[Name 
  and address]Many thanksDebbie SlaterPerth, WA 
  


Re: [ozmidwifery] Fwd: Endosring NMAP

2002-09-12 Thread Lois Wattis



I wish to endorse the NMAP. Please include my 
name on the register. Thank you Lois Wattis, Registered Midwife, IPM- 
ACMI


  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 7:05 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Fwd: Endosring 
  NMAP
  LoisI don't have you down, so could you just 
  confirm by reply to this email that you have 
  endorsed?ThanksDebbie 


Re: [ozmidwifery] Implanon Implant

2002-09-12 Thread Marilyn Kleidon



I am assuming that Implanon is the trade name and 
is the same as or similar to Norplant in the USA. Does anyone have a website for 
pharmaceuticals that gives the generic name then the brand names from various 
countries? I was thrown yesterday for about 30 mins trying to remember 
"Norplant". I am surprised that it is being implanted in hospital. 
Wouldn't it be better to wait 6 - 8 weeks for the postpartum hormonal milleui to 
settle down naturally? What is your breastfeeding rate? I think mood swings etc. 
are known side effects and will be listed in the accompanying literature. In 
California and Washington I found Social Workers who worked with our teen mums 
really encouraged them to get onto either the hormonal implants or the injection 
of hormones (Depoprevera in the USA)because they really wanted to prevent 
more pregnancies, understandable, but it usually did 3 things: mood swings, 
weight gain and diminished milk supply. But the social workers didn't seem too 
worried about the milk as they seemed to want the girls not pregnant and back in 
the workforce asap, they werevery gung hofor breastfeeding at birth 
for colostrum and bonding but fine with weaning by 6 - 8 weeks. I believe 
that any of the hormonal birth control medications (pills, implants, injections) 
will have effect on moods especially on women prone to depression or mood swings 
and wouldn't that be most postpartum women? Lastly, shouldn't it be the woman's 
choice not hospital policy? marilyn

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Trish David 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 3:33 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Implanon 
  Implant
  Yes, my sister had terrible mood swings and got really angry at 
  her nearly three year old son and her 20 month old daughter. She was depressed 
  and upset all the time, and has been much better since it was removed. She now 
  has one of the new generation IUDs and is feeling much more secure and happy. 
  Though two under three is a handful. Trish 
  Claudia van Duyn wrote: 
  Has anyone come across clients 
with negative side effects from the use of the Implanon Implant? In one of 
my job sites we use Implanon on most of our ward population following birth, 
it is seen as a wonder contraceptive. In the other job site the local 
GP has just informed me that quite a few of his patients have requested the 
removal of the implant. Un-desirable effects such as weight 
gain, mood swings etc are quoted.NBS; 
What are your opinions/experiences of Implanon? Both 
the GP and I are interested in your opinions. 
Claudia  


Yahoo! Messenger for SMS - Now send  receive IMs 
on your mobile via SMS


Re: [ozmidwifery] Midwifery in Victoria

2002-09-12 Thread Jayne



I'd really like to know what is officially going 
on. Does anybody really know?

And if it is true that the Vic Nurse's Board can 
deregister a midwife attending a homebirth in Victoria without PI 
insurance, who gives them this right?

Jayne



  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:19 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Midwifery in 
  Victoria
  
  Sally the vic borad of nursing has never 
  publically suggested in any shape or form that independant mws have a problem 
  when and if they do we can act Is this niave?
  Where does your information come from 
  ?
  jan
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Sally 
Westbury 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 
10:03 AM
Subject: FW: [ozmidwifery] Midwifery in 
Victoria


I’m astounded by 
the silence on this issue… 

-Original 
Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
On Behalf Of Sally 
WestburySent: 
Monday, 9 
September 2002 2:44 
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [ozmidwifery] Midwifery in 
Victoria

Tina, or anyone 
else who know,

I’m curious to know 
how (or if) the insurance issues for the Midwifery students has been 
resolved.


I would also urge 
people to be careful about naming any midwife in 
Victoria who may be 
attending homebirths. It is my understanding that the Nurses Board of 
Victoria will deregister anyone who attends a homebirth with out the 
professional indemnity insurance that we cannot get, if they are informed of 
it. This information could come from any person. Say someone who doesn’t 
like homebirths reads in the newspaper or on ozmidwifery that a midwife has 
been publically thanked for her help, they ring the board and tell them.. 
the board can deregister them.

Sound like a witch 
hunt to me. I’m glad I’m not there but am really worried who will be next. 


What action is 
happening in Victoria to discuss this 
with the Board at present? What help do you need in 
Victoria?

Sally 
Westbury


RE: [ozmidwifery] vaginal ultrasound

2002-09-12 Thread Robyn Thompson

Hi Team and Hi Tina
The American Food  Drug Administration issued warnings about ultrasound
over nearly 12 years ago.  They were extremely concerned about the affect on
the fetus, especially the middle ear and the ovum laid down in the female
fetus in the last trimester.   They said we would probably not see the
subtle effects until one or two generations later.

Leanne can you refer me to the article, so I can place it into Hot Topics on
my website.

Thanks  Robyn
www.melbmidwifery.com.au

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of leanne wynne
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 9:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] vaginal ultrasound


Hi Tina,
The article was in Popular Science Vol. 260 No.3. It was just a short news
story describing the research of Mostafa Fatemi of the Mayo clinic in
Minnesota.
It said in part: Fatemi wondered why ... fetuses always seem to move and
stretch while their (ultrasound) picture is taken. He found out by placing a
tiny hydrophone inside a woman's uterus during the procedure. The device
registered up to nearly 100 decibels - as loud as a subway train. While we
can't hear it, a fetus can, says Fatemi, becuase a 'fetus's ears are filled
with fluid, which is a better conductor of ultrasound waves than air.'
There's currently no evedence showing that such noise is harmful, but Fatemi
says clinicians may want to aim their ultrsound proves more carefully...
If I can find the time I will see if I can find some more information about
Fatemi's research on the web.
Leanne.

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] vaginal ultrasound
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 11:00:16 EDT

In a message dated 11/09/02 9:21:51 AM AUS Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


  Dear All,
  I just wanted to add a note to your comment about the effect of
ultrasounds
 
  on a baby's hearing. Recently my husband pointed-out to me an article
about
 
  ultrasound that he came across in a Science journal. (he is a physics
  teacher) The article was speaking about some research designed to
discover
  why babies move so much during an ultrasound scan. They found that to
the
  baby the ultrasound waves are the volume of a locomotive train!! Is it
any
  wonder babies try to get away from it? I will ask him for the name of
the
  journal so I can post it on Ozmidwifery for everyone.
  Leanne,
  Midwife, Mildura Aboriginal Health Service.


Yes Please LeanneI for one would be very interested!!

Yours in midwifery
Tina Pettigrew.






_
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.



Re: [ozmidwifery] NCAD

2002-09-12 Thread Aviva Sheb'a



I'm so glad you had such a good day. Rosie's 
scholarship presentation went on for a long time, then lunch and Rosie guided us 
through the Urrbrae farm, marsupial enclosure, wombat tunnel (!), etc. It was a 
great day for us too.

Love,

Aviva
- Original Message - 
From: Carolyn 
Donaghey 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:15 AM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] NCAD
Thanks TaniaIt was great to see you there, and thank you 
for all the wonderful work you do supporting women.


RE: [ozmidwifery] Fwd: Endosring NMAP

2002-09-12 Thread Julie Clarke








I endorse NMAP





Julie Clarke

Childbirth and Parenting Educator

Transition into Parenthood Classes

9 Withybrook Pl

Sylvania NSW 2224

T(02) 9544 6441

F(02) 9544 9257

M. 0410 265530

email
[EMAIL PROTECTED]







-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 12 September 2002
9:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Fwd:
Endosring NMAP



Lois

I don't have you down, so could you just confirm by reply to this email that
you have endorsed?

Thanks

Debbie 








RE: [ozmidwifery] vaginal ultrasound

2002-09-12 Thread leanne wynne

Hi Robyn,
The original article came from Popular Science Vol.260 No. 3. But if you 
go to the Mayo Clinic web-site www.mayo.edu/ultrasound/news you will find a 
much more comprehensive article describing the research. It makes very 
interesting reading.
All the best,
Leanne.


From: Robyn Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] vaginal ultrasound
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 08:59:43 +1000

Hi Team and Hi Tina
The American Food  Drug Administration issued warnings about ultrasound
over nearly 12 years ago.  They were extremely concerned about the affect 
on
the fetus, especially the middle ear and the ovum laid down in the female
fetus in the last trimester.   They said we would probably not see the
subtle effects until one or two generations later.

Leanne can you refer me to the article, so I can place it into Hot Topics 
on
my website.

Thanks  Robyn
www.melbmidwifery.com.au

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of leanne wynne
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 9:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] vaginal ultrasound


Hi Tina,
The article was in Popular Science Vol. 260 No.3. It was just a short 
news
story describing the research of Mostafa Fatemi of the Mayo clinic in
Minnesota.
It said in part: Fatemi wondered why ... fetuses always seem to move and
stretch while their (ultrasound) picture is taken. He found out by placing 
a
tiny hydrophone inside a woman's uterus during the procedure. The device
registered up to nearly 100 decibels - as loud as a subway train. While we
can't hear it, a fetus can, says Fatemi, becuase a 'fetus's ears are filled
with fluid, which is a better conductor of ultrasound waves than air.'
There's currently no evedence showing that such noise is harmful, but 
Fatemi
says clinicians may want to aim their ultrsound proves more carefully...
If I can find the time I will see if I can find some more information about
Fatemi's research on the web.
Leanne.

 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] vaginal ultrasound
 Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 11:00:16 EDT
 
 In a message dated 11/09/02 9:21:51 AM AUS Eastern Standard Time,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 
   Dear All,
   I just wanted to add a note to your comment about the effect of
 ultrasounds
  
   on a baby's hearing. Recently my husband pointed-out to me an article
 about
  
   ultrasound that he came across in a Science journal. (he is a physics
   teacher) The article was speaking about some research designed to
 discover
   why babies move so much during an ultrasound scan. They found that to
 the
   baby the ultrasound waves are the volume of a locomotive train!! Is it
 any
   wonder babies try to get away from it? I will ask him for the name of
 the
   journal so I can post it on Ozmidwifery for everyone.
   Leanne,
   Midwife, Mildura Aboriginal Health Service.
 
 
 Yes Please LeanneI for one would be very interested!!
 
 Yours in midwifery
 Tina Pettigrew.
 
 




_
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.




_
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.



FW: [ozmidwifery] Midwifery in Victoria

2002-09-12 Thread Sally Westbury









They gave themselves this right by adding
a clause last year.



-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Jayne
Sent: Friday, 13 September 2002 5:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery]
Midwifery in Victoria





I'd really like to know what is officially going on.
Does anybody really know?











And if it is true that the Vic Nurse's Board can deregister
a midwife attending a homebirth in Victoria
without PI insurance, who gives them this right?











Jayne



















- Original Message - 





From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 





Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:19 PM





Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery]
Midwifery in Victoria











Sally the vic borad of nursing has never publically
suggested in any shape or form that independant mws have a problem when and if
they do we can act Is this niave?





Where does your information come from ?





jan







- Original Message - 





From: Sally
Westbury 





To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 





Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:03 AM





Subject: FW: [ozmidwifery]
Midwifery in Victoria









Im astounded by the silence on this
issue 



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Sally Westbury
Sent: Monday, 9 September 2002 2:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ozmidwifery] Midwifery
in Victoria



Tina, or anyone else who know,



Im curious to know how (or if) the
insurance issues for the Midwifery students has been resolved.





I would also urge people to be careful
about naming any midwife in Victoria who may be attending homebirths. It is my understanding that the
Nurses Board of Victoria will deregister anyone who attends a homebirth with
out the professional indemnity insurance that we cannot get, if they are
informed of it. This information could come from any person. Say someone who
doesnt like homebirths reads in the newspaper or on ozmidwifery that a
midwife has been publically thanked for her help, they ring the board and tell
them.. the board can deregister them.



Sound like a witch hunt to me. Im
glad Im not there but am really worried who will be next. 



What action is happening in Victoria to discuss this with the Board at present? What help do you need
in Victoria?



Sally Westbury












Re: [ozmidwifery] Poster...for better birth!

2002-09-12 Thread Laurelle Williams

Great poster; shame about the US spelling of CAESAREAN!
Laurelle
At 23:12 10/09/02 -0700, you wrote:



Dear  All

Nic  Edmondstone and I have developed a poster which supports the right of
every  woman to choose a midwife as her lead maternity carer...If you wish
to see it,  email me direct and I'll send it as an attachment. They are
selling at cost  price (printing and posting that is) to promote midwifery
care, particularly  important now in the lead up to NMAP.
Maternity Coalition will be distributing some in each  state...there are
plenty more available by emailing me.

Yours  for Better Birth,
Vicki





There are only two ways to live your life.  
One is as though nothing is a miracle.  
The other is as though everything is a miracle. 
Einstein.




--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.



[ozmidwifery] ultrasound

2002-09-12 Thread Pinky McKay



Are mothers generally given this info re 
ultrasounds?? Would they consider it if they were offered it? OR has ultrasound 
become such a "normal" part of pregnancy care - like 3d pictures and videos now 
touted around even by proud grandparents -yes my neighbour was ecstatic to see 
her prospective grandchild on video!!

With my 4th baby (1983) I had ultrasound late in 
preg to check position of a low lying placenta. the technicians were taking much 
longer than I thought was necessary and my baby was becoming irritable (She must 
have heard the train coming!!). When I asked why they were taking so long -I was 
told they were doing pelvic measurements as I seemed to have a large baby 
and small pelvis.

I asked if they had detemined the placenta position 
(which they had) then sat up and said I am leaving. My baby is distressed 
(mother instinct/ attunement - she certainly wasnt "enjoying the 
interaction" - interaction was what she enjoyed when her siblings talked 
to her gently through my belly). The technicians were quite stunned and 
disbelieving as they threw around "reassurances"(to themselves?) -' but we need 
to check this,you might need a caesarean' - I said, 'read my history 
-I have birthed three babies larger than 4000 grams -"I will not be flat on my 
back then and my birth hormones will help my pelvis make room for my 
baby."

My concern with this sound thing is the number of 
children (one of mine included) who have hidden disbilities such as auditory 
processing difficulties -although my child hears well one on one with no 
background noise, he is unable to discern speech when there are background 
noises -ie in aclassroom / when there is an airconditioner going.If 
anything, he has supersensitivity to noise - a computer switched on (not being 
used, simply the buzzing) in the family room can not be blocked out as he goes 
to sleep in his bedroom and therefore irritates him significantly. (?? damage to 
delicate nerves by ultrasound during pregnancy!!??)

This of course (along with a light sensitivity that 
affects visual perception - he now wears coloured glasses), makes learning very 
difficult, exhausting,and frustrating,even though he is a bright little 
boy. And, because he looks completely normal, plays well, behaves ok 
(mostly!!)etc etc , he has had to bear all the usual trauma of a learning 
disabled child labelled as "not striving" / could do better/ must stay in to 
finish worketc etc.

In This pregnancy I had a vaginal ultrasound - once 
again to determine placenta position for bleeding.
I am not into beating up on myself after the event 
-self flagellation comes with the stretch marks!! butthis does raise 
questions for me -maybe we won't see obvious damage for a generation or 
so, or perhaps we are actually seeing this now. Subtlehandicaps are often 
more difficult to help or diagnoseand perhaps they ARE presenting in this 
generation of kids - look at the increase of ADHD -although this, like 
other "hidden handicaps" is oftenattributed to "bad mothering" (dont 
get me started on the damage caused by "behaviour management"), it is very real 
for the parents and children living with it. 


Pinky
www.pinky-mychild.com



RE: [ozmidwifery] Poster...for better birth!

2002-09-12 Thread Alphia Garrety

Hi Vicki,

I would also like a poster for my research.  Please send it to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thank you so much
Take care
Alphia



  

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.



Re: [ozmidwifery] c/s for breech

2002-09-12 Thread Rhonda








  I know! My first baby was "gently lifted out" - (at 27wks) - I 
  have the scar to prove it! 2lb baby - hip to hip 
  scar. Akk!!! Exactly.
  My full term baby was not so fortunate. 
  Rhonda
  
  ---Original Message---
  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Date: Thursday, 
  September 12, 2002 15:52:15
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: 
  [ozmidwifery] c/s for breech
  
  "gently lifted out"?
  She obviously didn't see the actual birth of her baby... 
  most often the head has to be wrenched out of the pelvis, usually with 
  forceps, then squeezed out through the skin, pushed from the top. To 
  be gently lifted out, it would have to be a 40cm vertical cut into the 
  uterus...
  
  Ack!
  
  Jo
  





	
	
	
	
	
	
	




 IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - 
Click 
Here



Re: [ozmidwifery] great birth

2002-09-12 Thread Judy Chapman

Hi Lois,
I am in Mackay.
Unfortunately most breech babiesare born by CS because of the fear of litigation and the Term Breech trial. 
Some of the women are offered a trial of vaginal birth but are too frightened by what they hear that many choose CS.
The breech baby she supervised was born to a primip whose mother had a rapid vaginal breech birth for her first baby and who had a belief that she would. She was to have a trial of vaginal birth (hate that trial of ... expression) and laboured as fast as did her Mum. One hour first stage, was almost ready to push on arrival. Ob (registrar at that time) walked in as the breech was emerging beautifully and she just stood there, smiling. When it was obvious she was not going to take over I started to enjoy the experience. I really did not have to do anything, nature did it and I just stood there catching. 
It was great. 
Have only done one more breech since then and that was not such a good story. 
Cheers
Judy




From: "Lois Wattis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] great birth 
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 18:02:37 +0800 

Thanks for sharing this good news story, Judy. It has warmed my heart and encouraged my spirit. Where do you practise? Am I to assume your unit "permits" vaginal breech births from your comment "she supervised my first breech birth"? How enlightened, and how inspiring. Congratulations! Lois 
- Original Message - 
From: Judy Chapman 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 5:19 PM 
Subject: [ozmidwifery] great birth 


Heard a great story today. 

Was in Birth Suite last week and took the booking for an ECV for Sunday from one of the private obs doing some public work. She booked it for Sunday as she wanted to do it herself. This obs is in her second year out and spent the last year of her ob training as a registrar with us and was not too bad (she supervised my first breech birth). 

The baby did not turn so the woman went home and the CS was booked (fear of litigation because of the results of the Term Breech Trial). The woman was a G2 P1 who had had a rapid, non interventionist birth with her first baby. Well, just with Bowen thereapy anyway. 

Woman went home, labour started, she stayed at home as long as she could and arrived pushing, then completed what I believe was a beautiful standing breech birth. The ob was really pleased that the scenario was taken out of her hands and the result was all one could wish for. 

Cheers 


Judy 




-- 
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: Click Here 
-- This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics. Visit to subscribe or unsubscribe. 
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: Click Here
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit  to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] c/s for breech

2002-09-12 Thread Joy Cocks
Title: Message



When you look around at the general community, a lot of people 
have a little scar near the outer edge of their eyebrow - now I know some of 
these will be due to accidents in later life, but very often they're from 
forceps births. I've actually quite often confirmed this with people that 
I know either in a private or professional capacity.
Joy


Joy Cocks RN (Div 1) RM CBE IBCLCBRIGHT Vic 3741 
email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Karen Arthur 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: Friday, 13 September 2002 
7:23
  Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] c/s for 
  breech
  
  Yeah, a friend of mine had a planned c/s this week and they used 
  forceps which scratched the baby's forehead. They were told that no 
  scarring would occur (being newborn skin) but I personally know a guy who's 30 
  with a big forceps scar on his temple!
  
  Caesareans. Gentle births? I don't think 
  so.
  
  Karen


Re: [ozmidwifery] ultrasoound research

2002-09-12 Thread TinaPettigrew
In a message dated 12/09/02 10:45:20 AM AUS Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


Dear Tina,
If you go to the Mayo Clinic web-site you will find a more complete 
description of this interesting research. It is: 
www.mayo.edu/ultrasound/news/
Regards, Leanne.



Hi Leanne...thank you for your help with this...US is my hobbie horseso I will be having a good look at this..

Cheers Tina