[ozmidwifery] Isobel Joy has arrived...

2006-07-15 Thread Janet Fraser




Isobel Joy Stokes Fraser was born 
beautifully at home, in water, into her daddy's hands Thursday 13th 
July.

She weighs 3.7kgs and has taken to 
life earthside with remarkable alacrity!

Thanks to those who supported me 
through a challenging, lengthy labour. I couldn't have done it without 
you!

Photos as soon as they're 
uploaded.

From Janet, Trevor, Conor AND 
Isobel!

For home birth information go 
to:Joyous Birth Australian home birth network and forums.http://www.joyousbirth.info/Or 
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [ozmidwifery] Isobel Joy has arrived...

2006-07-15 Thread Jo Watson
Congratulations, Janet!  Well done :)Welcome, Isobel!JoOn 15/07/2006, at 7:29 PM, Janet Fraser wrote:Isobel Joy Stokes Fraser was born beautifully at home, in water, into her daddy's hands Thursday 13th July. She weighs 3.7kgs and has taken to life earthside with remarkable alacrity! Thanks to those who supported me through a challenging, lengthy labour. I couldn't have done it without you! Photos as soon as they're uploaded. From Janet, Trevor, Conor AND Isobel! For home birth information go to:Joyous Birth Australian home birth network and forums.http://www.joyousbirth.info/Or email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [ozmidwifery] Isobel Joy has arrived...

2006-07-15 Thread Susan Cudlipp



Congratulations Janet- enjoy
Sue

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Janet 
  Fraser 
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  
  Sent: Saturday, July 15, 2006 7:29 
  PM
  Subject: [ozmidwifery] Isobel Joy has 
  arrived...
  
  
  Isobel Joy Stokes Fraser was born 
  beautifully at home, in water, into her daddy's hands Thursday 13th 
  July.
  
  She weighs 3.7kgs and has taken to 
  life earthside with remarkable alacrity!
  
  Thanks to those who supported me 
  through a challenging, lengthy labour. I couldn't have done it without 
  you!
  
  Photos as soon as they're 
  uploaded.
  
  From Janet, Trevor, Conor AND 
  Isobel!
  
  For home birth information go 
  to:Joyous Birth Australian home birth network and forums.http://www.joyousbirth.info/Or 
  email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  

  No virus found in this incoming message.Checked by AVG Free 
  Edition.Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.1/389 - Release Date: 
  14/07/2006


[ozmidwifery] Powers to investigate stillbirth article

2006-07-15 Thread Helen and Graham



I can already see 
the induction rate rising.

http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/mystery-infant-deaths-must-face-tougher-scrutiny/2006/07/15/1152637919967.html?page=fullpage#contentSwap1

Mystery infant 
deaths must face tougher scrutiny
by Carmel 
Egan
July 16, 2006 
Mysterious deaths of hundreds of babies before 
or during childbirth are not being investigated because of a legal 
loophole.

Hospitals and medical staff are not legally required to examine or explain 
the causes of stillbirth, and coroners can only investigate the cause of death 
after life has begun. Under Australian law, life begins when a baby takes its 
first breath.
But every year, 2000 foetuses between 20 weeks and full term never make it 
that far. And one in three of those dies for unknown reasons. The rate of 
unexplained deaths rises to 80 per cent as the foetus approaches full term.
Now a leading State Government medical adviser and SIDS and Kids Australia 
are urging governments to allow the independent investigation of late-term 
stillbirths.
Associate Professor James King, chairman of the Victorian Consultative 
Council on Obstetric and Pediatric Mortality and Morbidity, wants coroners' 
powers extended. "I favour an extension of coronial authority to include 
discretionary investigation of certain categories of stillbirth, particularly 
where the death occurs shortly before or during the birth process," Professor 
King said.
Despite advances in medicine, there has been no reduction in the incidence of 
stillbirths in a decade.
Researchers believe more stillbirths could be explained if clinicians 
counselled parents to give their consent to autopsies. They believe medical 
staff's reticence to do so comes from a combination of misguided compassion, 
undervaluing the benefit to parents and the community of identifying the causes 
of stillbirth, and fear of litigation.
The call for action comes as the State Coroner investigates the death of 
William Grant Keays, a baby resuscitated at birth who died 6½ hours later, on 
November 2, 2003. His mother, Karin Keays, has asked the Coroner to draw the 
public's attention to the powerlessness of parents whose children are 
stillborn.
"Because the Coroner does not have the power, there is no effective avenue 
for the independent investigation of stillborn babies," Mrs Keays said. "It is a 
terrible loophole in the law related to obstetrics.
"I believe that laws regarding the conduct and accountability of 
obstetricians and hospitals need urgent revision and sweeping changes.
"The legal loophole which classes full-term or near-term babies as not being 
'people' who would otherwise be entitled to the protection of the law, is 
draconian and needs to be closed," she said.

"Authorities … seem to pussyfoot around the subject of medical error and 
negligence in obstetrics for fear of upsetting obstetricians.
"But what about all the stillborn and neonatal deaths? What about the babies' 
rights? They seem to have none.
"What about the parents' rights to honesty and transparency of information 
from their doctors and midwives?"
After its success in reducing, through parental education, the rate of cot 
death from 500 a year to about 60 a year, SIDS and Kids Australia has expanded 
its focus to stillbirth. Janet Carey, national executive of research and 
programs at SIDS and Kids, said there was a lack of political and social focus 
on the issue because it was emotional and difficult to discuss.
"This is the same issue that faced parents 20 years ago after their child had 
died of sudden infant death syndrome and there were no answers," Ms Carey 
said.
"Now we hope to create some urgency about stillbirths and how many 
unexplained deaths there are before birth."
Researchers at Brisbane's Mater Mothers' Hospital are collating the world's 
first large-scale study of stillbirths.
"The stillbirth rate in Australia is just not going down," said Vicki 
Flenady, co-ordinator of the hospital's perinatal mortality group.
Ms Flenady said the reluctance of clinicians to push parents to consent to 
autopsy was a major barrier to the further reduction of 
stillbirths.



Re: [ozmidwifery] Isobel Joy has arrived...

2006-07-15 Thread Ceri Katrina
Congratulations and best wishes to you all

Katrina :-)

On 15/07/2006, at 9:29 PM, Janet Fraser wrote:

Isobel Joy Stokes Fraser was born beautifully at home, in water, into her daddy's hands Thursday 13th July.
 
She weighs 3.7kgs and has taken to life earthside with remarkable alacrity!
 
Thanks to those who supported me through a challenging, lengthy labour. I couldn't have done it without you!
 
Photos as soon as they're uploaded.
 
From Janet, Trevor, Conor AND Isobel!
 
For home birth information go to:
Joyous Birth 
Australian home birth network and forums.
http://www.joyousbirth.info/
Or email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [ozmidwifery] Powers to investigate stillbirth article

2006-07-15 Thread jo








It is very obvious that the womb is not a safe
place to be and if the womb is not safe then being pushed through a vagina is even
less safe. So lets all have c/sections at 36 weeks to ensure the safety
of our babies.



I remember in 99 at the Byron hb conference
hearing Germaine Greer speak of a time when we will have a little incubating cupboard
that sits in the corner of our lounge room which is an artificial womb, we will
be able to set the temperature, regulate nutrition and choose the sex, hair colour,
eye colour etc etc of our children. She went on to say that we would more than likely
have a huge population of beautiful blond haired, blue eyed boys that were so FU%#
UP that theyd all end up like Martin Bryant (remember the Port Arthur massacre).



Food for thought!



Jo Hunter x











From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au [mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au] On Behalf Of Helen and Graham
Sent: Sunday, 16 July 2006 9:28 AM
To: ozmidwifery
Subject: [ozmidwifery] Powers to
investigate stillbirth article







I can already see the induction rate rising.











http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/mystery-infant-deaths-must-face-tougher-scrutiny/2006/07/15/1152637919967.html?page=fullpage#contentSwap1











Mystery infant deaths must face tougher scrutiny





by Carmel
Egan









July 16, 2006 





Mysterious deaths of hundreds of babies before or during
childbirth are not being investigated because of a legal loophole.





Hospitals
and medical staff are not legally required to examine or explain the causes of
stillbirth, and coroners can only investigate the cause of death after life has
begun. Under Australian law, life begins when a baby takes its first breath.

But
every year, 2000 foetuses between 20 weeks and full term never make it that
far. And one in three of those dies for unknown reasons. The rate of
unexplained deaths rises to 80 per cent as the foetus approaches full term.

Now
a leading State Government medical adviser and SIDS and Kids Australia are
urging governments to allow the independent investigation of late-term
stillbirths.

Associate
Professor James King, chairman of the Victorian Consultative Council on
Obstetric and Pediatric Mortality and Morbidity, wants coroners' powers
extended. I favour an extension of coronial authority to include
discretionary investigation of certain categories of stillbirth, particularly
where the death occurs shortly before or during the birth process,
Professor King said.

Despite
advances in medicine, there has been no reduction in the incidence of
stillbirths in a decade.

Researchers
believe more stillbirths could be explained if clinicians counselled parents to
give their consent to autopsies. They believe medical staff's reticence to do
so comes from a combination of misguided compassion, undervaluing the benefit
to parents and the community of identifying the causes of stillbirth, and fear
of litigation.

The
call for action comes as the State Coroner investigates the death of William
Grant Keays, a baby resuscitated at birth who died 6½ hours later, on November
2, 2003. His mother, Karin Keays, has asked the Coroner to draw the public's
attention to the powerlessness of parents whose children are stillborn.

Because
the Coroner does not have the power, there is no effective avenue for the
independent investigation of stillborn babies, Mrs Keays said. It
is a terrible loophole in the law related to obstetrics.

I
believe that laws regarding the conduct and accountability of obstetricians and
hospitals need urgent revision and sweeping changes.

The
legal loophole which classes full-term or near-term babies as not being
'people' who would otherwise be entitled to the protection of the law, is
draconian and needs to be closed, she said.





Authorities  seem to pussyfoot around
the subject of medical error and negligence in obstetrics for fear of upsetting
obstetricians.

But
what about all the stillborn and neonatal deaths? What about the babies'
rights? They seem to have none.

What
about the parents' rights to honesty and transparency of information from their
doctors and midwives?

After
its success in reducing, through parental education, the rate of cot death from
500 a year to about 60 a year, SIDS and Kids Australia has expanded its focus
to stillbirth. Janet Carey, national executive of research and programs at SIDS
and Kids, said there was a lack of political and social focus on the issue
because it was emotional and difficult to discuss.

This
is the same issue that faced parents 20 years ago after their child had died of
sudden infant death syndrome and there were no answers, Ms Carey said.

Now
we hope to create some urgency about stillbirths and how many unexplained
deaths there are before birth.

Researchers
at Brisbane's
Mater Mothers' Hospital are collating the world's first large-scale study of
stillbirths.

The
stillbirth rate in Australia
is just not going down, said Vicki 

Re: [ozmidwifery] Breastfeeding in OT

2006-07-15 Thread suzi and brett



Congratulations Meg, we look forward to a time when 
women needing c/s are routinely offered this option. love Suzi

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  meg 
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  
  Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 7:41 
PM
  Subject: [ozmidwifery] Breastfeeding in 
  OT
  
  Dear all,
  I would just like to boast because today I 
  achieve a goal. With the help of an obliging mum, this morning I managed to 
  receive a baby in OT, and except for the brief moment when I rearranged bub 
  and checked first apgar, mother and baby remained together, skin to 
  skin,for the duration of the operation. Even having a good twenty minute 
  breastfeed whilst OP progressed. Mother was very impressed that a baby would 
  fed so soon after birth. Both mum and bub had a good sleep (still skin to 
  skin) on return to ward. 
  
  Megan


[ozmidwifery] Article on breastfeeding preventing bed wetting

2006-07-15 Thread Helen and Graham





Breast-feeding may help prevent bed-wetting 
Benefits of brain development could play a role, researchers 
report
Reuters

Updated: 10:16 a.m. ET July 5, 2006



CHICAGO - Children 
breast-fed as infants are less likely to wet the bed later on, researchers 
reported Wednesday, probably because they have a developmental edge.
There is strong 
evidence that in many cases bed-wetting can “result from delayed 
neurodevelopment,” said the report from the Robert Wood Johnson Medical School 
in New Brunswick, New Jersey.
“There is 
biological plausibility in inferring that breast-feeding protects against 
bed-wetting and our results show a strong statistical association” although not 
enough to prove a direct cause-effect, the study said.
Breast-feeding is 
beneficial because of the role that certain fatty acids passed onto the infant 
play in brain development, said the study published in the July issue of 
Pediatrics, the journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics.
The study was based 
on 55 children who were bed-wetters at ages 5 to 13 and 117 in the same age 
range who were not. Of the bed-wetters, 45 percent had been breast-fed, compared 
to 81 percent of those who were continent at night. The study also found that 
babies who received breast milk supplemented with formula had a similar rate of 
bed-wetting as those who received formula alone.
Copyright 
2006 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of 
Reuters content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of 
Reuters.


URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13715951/


© 2006 MSNBC.com
I can't help but wonder if it is also to do with the emotional 
security that accompanies breastfeeding +/- co-sleepingHelen





 


ch=Healthc4=Healthc5=Children%27s%20Healthc7=printThisc8=Nc10=Bc15=13715951c16=Storyc18=10c39=ONpid=Story%7C
Description: Binary data


Re: [ozmidwifery] Isobel Joy has arrived...

2006-07-15 Thread Judy Chapman
Congratulations to you Janet and to the whole family. 
Cheers
Judy

--- Janet Fraser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Isobel Joy Stokes Fraser was born beautifully at home, in
 water, into her daddy's hands Thursday 13th July.
 
 She weighs 3.7kgs and has taken to life earthside with
 remarkable alacrity!
 
 Thanks to those who supported me through a challenging,
 lengthy labour. I couldn't have done it without you!
 
 Photos as soon as they're uploaded.
 
 From Janet, Trevor, Conor AND Isobel!
 
 For home birth information go to:
 Joyous Birth 
 Australian home birth network and forums.
 http://www.joyousbirth.info/
 Or email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Never miss an Instant Message - Yahoo! Messenger for SMS 
http://au.mobile.yahoo.com/mweb/index.html
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] Article on breastfeeding preventing bed wetting

2006-07-15 Thread Megan Larry



My own sample on this, 3 boys, aged 8, 6 4, all 
breastfed 'til 18mths, 18mths and 2yr 4mths, respectively, all still are night 
time wetters.

so are we unusual or does it really not make a difference 
when other factors are at play? 

Just wondering
Megan


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Helen and 
GrahamSent: Sunday, 16 July 2006 1:21 PMTo: 
ozmidwiferySubject: [ozmidwifery] Article on breastfeeding preventing 
bed wetting



Breast-feeding may help prevent bed-wetting 
Benefits of brain development could play a role, researchers 
report
Reuters

Updated: 10:16 a.m. ET July 5, 2006



CHICAGO - Children 
breast-fed as infants are less likely to wet the bed later on, researchers 
reported Wednesday, probably because they have a developmental edge.
There is strong 
evidence that in many cases bed-wetting can result from delayed 
neurodevelopment, said the report from the Robert Wood Johnson Medical School 
in New Brunswick, New Jersey.
There is 
biological plausibility in inferring that breast-feeding protects against 
bed-wetting and our results show a strong statistical association although not 
enough to prove a direct cause-effect, the study said.
Breast-feeding is 
beneficial because of the role that certain fatty acids passed onto the infant 
play in brain development, said the study published in the July issue of 
Pediatrics, the journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics.
The study was based 
on 55 children who were bed-wetters at ages 5 to 13 and 117 in the same age 
range who were not. Of the bed-wetters, 45 percent had been breast-fed, compared 
to 81 percent of those who were continent at night. The study also found that 
babies who received breast milk supplemented with formula had a similar rate of 
bed-wetting as those who received formula alone.
Copyright 
2006 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of 
Reuters content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of 
Reuters.


URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13715951/


 2006 MSNBC.com
I can't help but wonder if it is also to do with the emotional 
security that accompanies breastfeeding +/- co-sleepingHelen





 


[ozmidwifery] baby DVD

2006-07-15 Thread Pinky McKay




Forwarding this for a friend - her homebirthed sonactually - 
hes now making/ editingDVDs as a career

Subject: Baby DVD
Hi guys, 

We are possibly making a US version of the Baby DVD. We'll need an American 
couple we can follow around for a couple of months and then film their birth. I 
was wondering if you guys might know anyone who might be keen, or have access to 
any groups or networks who may have interested people, basically I'm floundering 
in the dark and need leads! I don't think filming would be till early next 
year...

Cheers

Leslie



Leslie Marsh
Creative Director

PNMG

InspiredCommunication

PNMG Pty Ltd
8 /1 Danks St
WATERLOO NSW 2017
Ph: +61 2 8399 2128
Fax: +61 2 8399 2141
Mob: 0433 399 280
http://www.pnmg.com.au

Sydney- Melbourne - Adelaide



Re: [ozmidwifery] Article on breastfeeding preventing bed wetting

2006-07-15 Thread Andrea Quanchi
55 children is surely not enough to draw this conclusion from. My first born was breast fed and still wet the bed for many yearsSomething like 1% of boys still wet the bed at 15 and I bet many of them were breast fedHow do they come up with these thingsAndrea QOn 16/07/2006, at 1:51 PM, Helen and Graham wrote: Breast-feeding may help prevent bed-wettingBenefits of brain development could play a role, researchers reportReutersUpdated: 10:16 a.m. ET July 5, 2006CHICAGO - Children breast-fed as infants are less likely to wet the bed later on, researchers reported Wednesday, probably because they have a developmental edge.There is strong evidence that in many cases bed-wetting can “result from delayed neurodevelopment,” said the report from the Robert Wood Johnson Medical School in New Brunswick, New Jersey.“There is biological plausibility in inferring that breast-feeding protects against bed-wetting and our results show a strong statistical association” although not enough to prove a direct cause-effect, the study said.Breast-feeding is beneficial because of the role that certain fatty acids passed onto the infant play in brain development, said the study published in the July issue of Pediatrics, the journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics.The study was based on 55 children who were bed-wetters at ages 5 to 13 and 117 in the same age range who were not. Of the bed-wetters, 45 percent had been breast-fed, compared to 81 percent of those who were continent at night. The study also found that babies who received breast milk supplemented with formula had a similar rate of bed-wetting as those who received formula alone.Copyright 2006 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters.URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13715951/© 2006 MSNBC.comI can't help but wonder if it is also to do with the emotional security that accompanies breastfeeding +/- co-sleepingHelen