Re: [ozmidwifery] from MIDIRS

2006-09-02 Thread Sadie



Ha ha - absolutely Mary - and you ain't 
dumb!!

Sadie

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Mary 
  Murphy 
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  
  Sent: Saturday, September 02, 2006 6:00 
  PM
  Subject: [ozmidwifery] from MIDIRS
  
  
  Predictors 
  of cesarean section following elective post-dates induction of labor in 
  nullipara with uncomplicated singleton vertex 
  pregnancies-Saudi Medical 
  Journal,vol 27, no 8, August 2006, pp 1167-1172Edris FE; von 
  Dadelszen P; Ainsworth LM; et al-(2006)OBJECTIVE: 
  Although post-dates is among the most common indications for induction of 
  labor, no studies have identified the predictors of cesarean section (C/S) in 
  that population. The high cesarean rate in our institution for this group of 
  women triggered us to assess different induction practices to elicit potential 
  causes. METHODS: We conducted a hospital-based retrospective cohort analysis 
  using chart reviews of all nullipara women with induced labor at the 
  Children's and Women's Health Centre of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada, 
  during the 2-year period, April 1998 to March 2000. The C/S rate was compared 
  among 3 groups of women who were divided according to their induction method. 
  RESULTS: Three hundred and thirty-nine women meeting the inclusion criteria 
  were induced. Of the 25 women who received oxytocin ideally and the 111 women 
  who did not, 7 (28%) and 53 (48%) were delivered by C/S, (x2=3.228 p=0.07; 
  relative risks 0.59 [95% confidence interval 0.30, 1.13]). A significantly 
  lower C/S rate (x2=21.9, p0.0005) was found among women induced with 
  prostaglandin (PG) alone (19.4%) compared with those induced with PG and 
  oxytocin, whether oxytocin was given ideally (38.3%) or not ideally (45.4%). 
  Of women who received oxytocin, there was no difference in chorioamnionitis 
  (x2=0.485, p=0.49) between those who had an early membrane rupture (with or 
  pre-oxytocin, 22.4%) and those who had membrane rupture following a period of 
  oxytocin infusion (18.5%). CONCLUSION: The need for oxytocin or less than 2 
  doses of PG is associated with increased risk of C/S. Whether oxytocin was 
  given according to protocol (ideally) or not, made no difference to the C/S 
  risk in this population. (Author)
  
  Am I dumb, or is 
  it them? I would think that the question is “is induction itself a 
  predictor of C/S” MM


Re: [ozmidwifery] OMG what next?

2006-09-02 Thread michelle gascoigne

That is just awful!
Shelly
- Original Message - 
From: Päivi Laukkanen [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 8:39 PM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] OMG what next?



What about this one?

http://www.pregnancystore.com/pushpal_birthing_aid.htm

Päivi

- Original Message - 
From: Jo Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 5:30 PM
Subject: [ozmidwifery] OMG what next?



http://www.pregnancystore.com/zaky.htm

I think this is actually a real product...

Jo

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.



--
Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.6.1/344 - Release Date: 19/05/2006





--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] OMG what next?

2006-09-02 Thread Gail McKenzie
Mary, I'm a midwifery student  I saw you at the Homebirth Australia 
Conference this year.  I've been on this mailing list since the beginning of 
the year  I've read it every day since I signed on.  I have to say that you 
have an uncanny knack of saying things in such a way that I go Oh yeah, 
that's another way of looking at it.  You should teach, if you don't 
already.  Being able to break things down  give people AHA moments is a 
real gift.  I for one would be a very willing pupil.  I love reading what 
you write.  I love reading what everyone on this site writes. You girls 
rock


LOL Gail :)



From: Mary Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] OMG what next?
Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 19:10:58 +0800

Just to play devils advocate, what is so terrible about something that 
helps

women do what they are already being instructed to do??  Put your hands
behind your knees, pull your legs up against your chest, put your chin on
your chest, close your mouth and push as hard as you can down into your
bottom.  This guy has just made an aid to make all those instructions a
little easier to follow.  I think it is the perception of need for such an
aid that is awful.  MM





That is just awful!

Shelly




--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] OMG what next?

2006-09-02 Thread Melanie Sommeling








Dont forget they have free postage
and handling J 











From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au [mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au] On Behalf Of Mary Murphy
Sent: Saturday, 2 September 2006
21:11
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] OMG
what next?





Just
to play devils advocate, what is so terrible about something that helps women
do what they are already being instructed to do?? Put your hands
behind your knees, pull your legs up against your chest, put your chin on your
chest, close your mouth and push as hard as you can down into your
bottom. This guy has just made an aid to make all those
instructions a little easier to follow. I think it is the perception of
need for such an aid that is awful. MM





That is just awful!

Shelly








[ozmidwifery] Another OMG moment...

2006-09-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.scarytoyclown.com/?p=44
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


[ozmidwifery] Maternity Coalition's activity

2006-09-02 Thread Helen and Graham



I hope this isn't a double up email - I have resent it as it 
didn't seem to get through.

Just thought I'd send thison for anyone not aware of 
Maternity Coalition's latest campaign. 


I just visited the 
website and plan to join up as this is an issue close to my 
heart.
Helen (there is a 
great flyer for people to put up in their local community about the new medicare 
item number available at the site - see below)


Birthing women in rural and remote Australia
Maternity Coalition is seriously 
concerned for the safety and health of expectant mothers and their babies living 
in rural and remote Australia if the Federal Government succeeds in pushing 
through changes about ante-natal care.

What are the changes?
The proposal by Health Minister Tony 
Abbott and his Department is to provide a new Medicare item 16400 so midwives, 
registered nurses and Aboriginal health workers can do ante-natal checks on 
behalf ofa GP or specialist obstetrician for women living in rural and 
remote Australia.
The only positive from this proposal 
is that the Federal Government has finally acknowledged there is a problem 
accessing quality maternity care for women and families living in rural and 
remote Australia. But their solution to the problem is just a 

‘quick fix’ that gives women in the 
bush second-rate maternity care from unskilled workers. If anything, it will probably lead to more 
lives being put at risk in the bush.
Why are the changes 
unsafe?
Maternity Coalition is concerned 
about a range of issues that this proposal raises but our key concern is with 
the safety of care women will receive 
under this item: 

  Regulatory bodies for 
  nurses and midwives have developed national competency standards. Antenatal 
  care is outside the educational background and scope of practice of all 
  nurses. They have neither the 
  qualifications nor the experience of providing antenatal care to pregnant 
  women. It is dangerous for women to 
  receive antenatal care from a nurse who is being pressured to provide care 
  outside the nurse’s scope of practice. 
  
  The 
  competency standards for midwives include antenatal care. Midwives are educated for between 18 months 
  and 3 years in all aspects of maternity care. 
  They are registered or endorsed to provide antenatal care across 
  Australia. Some Aboriginal Health 
  Workers have also obtained an educational qualification in antenatal care. 
  
  Many 
  rural GPs do not themselves have formal education in the provision of 
  antenatal care, except where they have obtained a Diploma in Obstetrics. They are therefore not well placed to assess 
  the skills and competence of nurses who also lack education in this, let alone 
  ‘supervising’ nurses to provide this care. 
  
  There is therefore no 
  guarantee under this policy that rural/remote women will receive antenatal 
  care from someone who is competent to provide it. Unskilled care is more dangerous than no 
  care as women are likely to assume their health is being adequately checked 
  and not seek care from an obstetrician or midwife. 
Why should women in rural 
Australia accept such care when we’re sure the Federal Government wouldn't 
suggest the idea for city dwellers?
A tragic story
Already in QLD we have seen the 
tragic consequences for a woman being cared for by a non-midwife. A nurse with no midwifery training, working on 
a post-natal ward, didn't understand the need for women to urinate after having 
a baby. Because of this, the woman, a first-time mother in her mid-20s had 
to undergo a complete hysterectomy because of this simple omission. The mother 
will never be able to have any more children naturally. If this proposal 
by the Federal Government gets through, we may see more tragic cases like this 
where pregnant women develop a pregnancy-related complication and the unskilled 
carer seeing them antenatally does not realise and does not refer them on to a 
midwife, GP or specialist obstetrician.
Who is 
concerned?
Maternity Coalition, a national 
maternity consumer group, is really concerned about this situation.Other 
professional bodies including the Australian College of Midwives also have major 
concerns about the safety for women if this change is adopted by the government. 
Many nursing organisations are concerned because they realise it will put nurses 
in difficult situations where they are practising beyond their 
competencies.
What you can do
Maternity Coalition and the 
Australian College of Midwives are preparing a massive media/lobbying campaign 
to draw attention to this proposal. But we need mothers and families from 
all over QLD/Australia to help. 


You can do a number of things: 


  Volunteer to speak about this 
  problem to your local and national media – we can get you fully briefed on the 
  issue so you feel prepared. 


  Write a letter to your Federal MP 
  and the Health Minister, Tony Abbott ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). 


  Write letters to your state’s 

RE: [ozmidwifery] OMG what next?

2006-09-02 Thread Mary Murphy








Thank You Gail. I do like teaching, but in a hands on way,
not a formal classroom way. I am not likely to be in a position to do anything
other than that as I just love being a community midwife. Cheers, MM



Mary, I'm a midwifery student  I saw you at the Homebirth
Australia 

Conference this year. I've been on this mailing list since the
beginning of 

the year  I've read it every day since I signed on. I have to say
that you 

have an uncanny knack of saying things in such a way that I go Oh
yeah, 

that's another way of looking at it. You should teach, if you
don't 

already. Being able to break things down  give people
AHA moments is a 

real gift. I for one would be a very willing pupil. I love reading
what 

you write. I love reading what everyone on this site writes. You girls


rockLOL Gail :)










Re: [ozmidwifery] OMG what next?

2006-09-02 Thread michelle gascoigne



That is what I meant really. We live in a 
commercial world where many agencies have to make a buck. It has been created by 
an obstetricain with 30 years of experience, what a shame he/she has not learned 
anything from watching women labourin his/her 30 years.
Shelly

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Mary 
  Murphy 
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  
  Sent: Saturday, September 02, 2006 12:10 
  PM
  Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] OMG what 
  next?
  
  
  Just 
  to play devils advocate, what is so terrible about something that helps women 
  do what they are already being instructed to do?? “Put your hands behind 
  your knees, pull your legs up against your chest, put your chin on your chest, 
  close your mouth and push as hard as you can down into your bottom”. 
  This guy has just made an aid to make all those instructions a little easier 
  to follow. I think it is the perception of need for such an aid that is 
  awful. MM
  
  
  That is just awful!
  Shelly
  
  

  Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.Checked by AVG Free 
  Edition.Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.6.1/344 - Release Date: 
  19/05/2006


[ozmidwifery] midwifery exchange

2006-09-02 Thread Päivi Laukkanen



Hi all,

I am having preliminary thoughts about 
startingsome kind ofsponsorship program for midwifery exchange. 
Earlier this year I met a Finnish obstetrician, who only does gynegology and 
homebirths at the moment. ( Only 4-6 homebirths / year. We only have some 20 
homebirths in our country..) Every year she travels to Holland to spend time 
with the local midwives. She said she needs this to boost her confidence and get 
inspiration for what she does.After this I have been wondering if I could 
start to sponsor (trough my maternity business) one midwife or midwifery 
studentevery year to travel somewherefor 2 weeks or 2 months to see 
how women labor and give birth in the non-medicaliced environment and 
care.This could be spending time with a homemidwife or maybe at a birthing 
centre or even both. If there happened to be some great homebirth conference 
around the time, wouldn't that be perfect for her. I think going to Holland the 
language might be bit of a problem, but US, UK or Australia would be great, 
since most people do speak good english.

Has anyone heard of programs like this? 

Are there some legal issues, I should worry about? 

Do you think there would be homebirth midwives or 
birth centres in Australia, which would take exchangees like this? 
What would be a good length for the stay? 

Do you think the exchange midwife could stay at the 
hosting midwife's home or would she need an apartment? 
Would it be better if two midwives from same unit 
would go, so they could share their experience and maybe be stronger to change 
things once they return home?
What kind of a payment you feel the hosting midwife 
would want for this time?

Almost twenty years ago I spent a year in Adelaide 
as a Rotary Exchange student. I lived with the local families and attended high 
school. I must say it was one of the best years in my life and it had a huge 
impact on my later life. It was great to learn so much about a different culture 
by living with these families. I am still very close to the people I stayed with 
and consider them my family. Have been back five times since then =). I am just 
thinking how much this experinece could change one midwife's views and 
practise... 

Please share any thoughts you have about 
this.

Regards,

Päivi Laukkanen
Childbirth Educator
Finland


Re: [ozmidwifery] Another OMG moment...

2006-09-02 Thread Lynne Staff

Which sicko wrote the blurb for this?
- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Saturday, September 02, 2006 10:07 PM
Subject: [ozmidwifery] Another OMG moment...



http://www.scarytoyclown.com/?p=44
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] OMG what next?

2006-09-02 Thread Mary Murphy








what a shame he/she has not learned anything from
watching women labourin his/her 30 years. I think that the point is: He hasnt watched them! He has
come in intermittently and at the last part and told them what to do. No
watching their body language or facial expressions, no learning. When
there is no continuity throughout the labour, there is no understanding of the
individual womans rhythm. This is also linked to the previous theme
of assessing women in labour without internal VEs. MM






















[ozmidwifery] Why I choose not to..

2006-09-02 Thread Pinky McKay



sent to me by a mum 
-substitute'breastfeeding' for "carseat"


WHY I CHOOSE NOT TO USE A CAR SEAT Author unknown I refuse to 
feel guilty for making an educated choice to not put my baby in a car seat. 
There are so many militant car seat users in our society and I am tired of 
them pushing their beliefs on me. There are lots of reasons I have made this 
choice. First of all, I want my husband to be able to drive him around in 
his car. He can just sit him on his lap when they go for a ride. This will 
help him bond and be closer with our son. I don't want to be the only one 
that drives him around. It makes my husband, mother and friends feel special 
when they can take him for rides. I will be returning to work in 6 weeks and 
I don't want a big old car seat in the back of our luxury car. I never put 
my first son in a car seat and he is just fine. I was never in a car seat, 
neither was my mother and we are both as healthy as can be. On the other 
hand, my sister in law's cousin used a car seat and her child was seriously 
injured in a car wreck. My aunt tried to use a car seat and wasn't able to. 
She was never able to latch the baby in the seat properly. In fact, my car 
is too small for a car seat anyway. What matters most is that my baby is 
healthy and happy. When I left the hospital, they told me that I 
should try to use the car seat, but if it didn't work out that it was all 
right to not use it. In fact, in the diaper bag that I received from the 
hospital, it has some information for how to safely ride in the car with my 
son without a car seat. I tried for 1 week to use a car seat with my first 
son and it made both of us miserable. I told my pediatrician about it, and 
he said it would probably be best to not use a car seat anymore. Now he is 
happy and content sitting on my lap as we drive. Using a car seat is just so 
inconvenient! My privacy is also an issue. Do I want everyone to know when 
they see my car that I have a child??? Besides, my children need to learn 
how to ride in the car without being in the car seat. I don't want a 3 year 
old still wanting to get in his seat! \ I know that using a car seat has 
some benefits, but there are a lot of people out there who don't use them 
and their kids are just fine! There are people out there that cannot use a 
car seat (can't latch baby in properly, car is too small, doesn't match with 
the interior). Using a car seat is a personal choice and nobody's business. 
As a parent I have made the decision for what is best for my child. It works 
best for us and our child.and that is all that is important. It's my 
choice after all, isn't it??


Re: [ozmidwifery] Another OMG moment...

2006-09-02 Thread ajoynt
We've got one of those at uni!!! And no offense to poor Noelle, but she's as
scary looking in real life as she is on the film! Haven't seen her give birth
yet, but last semester we used her to learn abdomonal palpation, and finding
the foetal heart rate. VE's this week... might be seeing a bit more of
her!!
Regards, Astra.

Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 http://www.scarytoyclown.com/?p=44
 --
 This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
 Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.




--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] from MIDIRS

2006-09-02 Thread Judy Chapman
tut tut Mary. Why would you think that, if you think there is no
other way to do 'the job' than to induce? (says she cynically)
cheers
Judy

--- Mary Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Predictors of cesarean section following elective post-dates
 induction of
 labor in nullipara with uncomplicated singleton vertex
 pregnancies - Saudi
 Medical Journal , vol 27, no 8, August 2006, pp 1167-1172
 Edris FE; von
 Dadelszen P; Ainsworth LM; et al - (2006) OBJECTIVE: Although
 post-dates is
 among the most common indications for induction of labor, no
 studies have
 identified the predictors of cesarean section (C/S) in that
 population. The
 high cesarean rate in our institution for this group of women
 triggered us
 to assess different induction practices to elicit potential
 causes. METHODS:
 We conducted a hospital-based retrospective cohort analysis
 using chart
 reviews of all nullipara women with induced labor at the
 Children's and
 Women's Health Centre of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada,
 during the
 2-year period, April 1998 to March 2000. The C/S rate was
 compared among 3
 groups of women who were divided according to their induction
 method.
 RESULTS: Three hundred and thirty-nine women meeting the
 inclusion criteria
 were induced. Of the 25 women who received oxytocin ideally
 and the 111
 women who did not, 7 (28%) and 53 (48%) were delivered by C/S,
 (x2=3.228
 p=0.07; relative risks 0.59 [95% confidence interval 0.30,
 1.13]). A
 significantly lower C/S rate (x2=21.9, p0.0005) was found
 among women
 induced with prostaglandin (PG) alone (19.4%) compared with
 those induced
 with PG and oxytocin, whether oxytocin was given ideally
 (38.3%) or not
 ideally (45.4%). Of women who received oxytocin, there was no
 difference in
 chorioamnionitis (x2=0.485, p=0.49) between those who had an
 early membrane
 rupture (with or pre-oxytocin, 22.4%) and those who had
 membrane rupture
 following a period of oxytocin infusion (18.5%). CONCLUSION:
 The need for
 oxytocin or less than 2 doses of PG is associated with
 increased risk of
 C/S. Whether oxytocin was given according to protocol
 (ideally) or not, made
 no difference to the C/S risk in this population. (Author)
 
  
 
 Am I dumb, or is it them?  I would think that the question is
 is induction
 itself a predictor of C/S MM
 
 




 
On Yahoo!7 
Check out PS Trixi - The hot new online adventure 
http://www.trixi.com.au
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] OMG what next?

2006-09-02 Thread Judy Chapman
Only in the US. The other item looked a bit expensive to get out
here, the hands. 
Cheers
Judy
--- Melanie Sommeling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Don't forget they have free postage and handling :-) 
  
   _  
 
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
 Mary Murphy
 Sent: Saturday, 2 September 2006 21:11
 To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
 Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] OMG what next?
  
 Just to play devils advocate, what is so terrible about
 something that helps
 women do what they are already being instructed to do??  Put
 your hands
 behind your knees, pull your legs up against your chest, put
 your chin on
 your chest, close your mouth and push as hard as you can down
 into your
 bottom.  This guy has just made an aid to make all those
 instructions a
 little easier to follow.  I think it is the perception of need
 for such an
 aid that is awful.  MM
  
  
 That is just awful!
 Shelly
 




 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Take part in Total Girl’s Ultimate Slumber Party and help break a world record 
http://www.totalgirl.com.au
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.