[Bug 834132] Review Request: subethasmtp - A SMTP mail server for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834132
Michal Srb m...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Michal Srb m...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable
Issues:
===
- Maven packages should use new style packaging
Note: If possible update your package to latest guidelines
See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#Apache_Maven
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must
be documented in the spec.
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm 4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Java:
[x]: Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x]: Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
subpackage
[x]: Javadoc subpackages should not have Requires: jpackage-utils
[x]: Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlink)
[x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build
Maven:
[x]: Pom files have correct Maven mapping
Note: Some add_maven_depmap calls found. Please check if they are correct
or update to latest guidelines
[x]: If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even
when building with ant
[x]: Old add_to_maven_depmap macro is not being used
[x]: Packages DOES NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on jpackage-
utils for %update_maven_depmap macro
[x]: Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[x]: Packages use %{_mavenpomdir} instead of %{_datadir}/maven2/poms
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package
[Bug 856545] Review Request: python-amqpclt - Versatile AMQP client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856545 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-amqpclt-0.5-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=zTPpBD4ajYa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 907688] Review Request: python-urllib3 - Python HTTP library with thread-safe connection pooling and file post
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907688 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||python-urllib3-1.5-6.fc19 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-urllib3-1.5-6.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=3r10x3zGbIa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 970130] Review Request: git-extras - Little git extras
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970130 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||git-extras-1.8.0-3.fc19 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed|2013-06-07 17:33:52 |2013-06-18 02:08:42 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- git-extras-1.8.0-3.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=GTTcLt1MtGa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 920174] Review Request: ghc-geniplate - Use template Haskell to generate Uniplate-like functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=920174 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||ghc-geniplate-0.6.0.3-1.fc1 ||9 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-06-18 02:09:01 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ghc-geniplate-0.6.0.3-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=bgT4XLJvdsa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 968599] Review Request: nodejs-esprima - ECMAScript parsing infrastructure for multipurpose analysis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968599 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|nodejs-esprima-1.0.3-2.fc18 |nodejs-esprima-1.0.3-2.fc19 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-esprima-1.0.3-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=lssG5Sv2H1a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 969111] Review Request: libxdiff - Basic functionality to create difference/patches in binary and text
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969111 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||libxdiff-1.0-1.fc19 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-06-18 02:11:07 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- libxdiff-1.0-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=qv4Ff2PWQUa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 867959] Review Request: libgit2 - C library for git
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867959 Bug 867959 depends on bug 969111, which changed state. Bug 969111 Summary: Review Request: libxdiff - Basic functionality to create difference/patches in binary and text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969111 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ayJiAPqNZ9a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 969850] Review Request: python-rosdistro - File format for managing ROS Distributions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969850 Bug 969850 depends on bug 969848, which changed state. Bug 969848 Summary: Review Request: python-catkin-sphinx - Sphinx plugins for Catkin projects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969848 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=6GHi329wqra=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 969848] Review Request: python-catkin-sphinx - Sphinx plugins for Catkin projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969848 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||python-catkin-sphinx-0.2.1- ||2.20130602gitc00d68b.fc19 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-06-18 02:20:18 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-catkin-sphinx-0.2.1-2.20130602gitc00d68b.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=iqxUzCTBZma=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 911023] Review Request: nodejs-ain2 - A Node.js module for syslog logging (and a continuation of ain)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911023 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|nodejs-ain2-1.2.1-4.fc18|nodejs-ain2-1.2.1-4.fc19 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-ain2-1.2.1-4.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=8sfnlgEpMIa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 973696] Review Request: php-pecl-jsonc - Support for JSON serialization
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973696 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||php-5.5.0-0.10.RC3.fc19 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- php-5.5.0-0.10.RC3.fc19, php-pecl-jsonc-1.3.1-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=uCKpVecQrFa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 856545] Review Request: python-amqpclt - Versatile AMQP client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856545 --- Comment #34 from Eduardo Echeverria echevemas...@gmail.com --- Please, don't put this bug in the BZ field of the bohdi updates, this is only necessary for the first update -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=B6Qbk5HtKOa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 919592] Review Request: cxmanage - a tool to manage Calxeda servers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919592 Douglas Schilling Landgraf dougsl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dougsl...@redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Douglas Schilling Landgraf dougsl...@redhat.com --- Howdy Jeff, Some comments: - python-devel in BR is deprecated See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#BuildRequires - Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Note: Upstream MD5sum check error See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 49a809cbff056905c0459bcfa32b293658d7d19ad68a9d00a6864e00448b62e9 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 1d6686e48d6c7e9790791f6fff371c2ebc16aca55ac83fdb6d4e3e247eda79d2 Thanks Douglas -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=kJkF402Quja=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975309] Review Request: libcutl - C++ utility library from Code Synthesis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975309 Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bjoern.es...@gmail.com Blocks||975310 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=OtPNjG5fJJa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975310] Review Request: odb - C++ Object-Relational Mapping
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975310 Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||975309 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=qF7M5Jepsma=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975339] New: Review Request: rubygem-gssapi - A FFI wrapper around the system GSSAPI library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975339 Bug ID: 975339 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-gssapi - A FFI wrapper around the system GSSAPI library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jpazdzi...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://adelton.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-gssapi.spec SRPM URL: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1695/5511695/rubygem-gssapi-1.1.2-1.fc19.src.rpm Description: A FFI wrapper around the system GSSAPI library. Please make sure and read the Yard docs or standard GSSAPI documentation if you have any questions. There is also a class called GSSAPI::Simple that wraps many of the common features used for GSSAPI. Fedora Account System Username: adelton -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=4qK6IB7Glwa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 962834] Review Request: libmetalink - a Metalink C library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962834 Alejandro Alvarez alejandro.alvarez.ayl...@cern.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|VERIFIED --- Comment #16 from Alejandro Alvarez alejandro.alvarez.ayl...@cern.ch --- Great, thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hNRMi59CJTa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 962834] Review Request: libmetalink - a Metalink C library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962834 Alejandro Alvarez alejandro.alvarez.ayl...@cern.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|VERIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed||2013-06-18 03:22:06 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=wtwpqoE4gsa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975309] Review Request: libcutl - C++ utility library from Code Synthesis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975309 Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=r5fnM9V5yDa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975310] Review Request: odb - C++ Object-Relational Mapping
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975310 Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bjoern.es...@gmail.com Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR), ||975312 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5SZDq0MWyba=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975312] Review Request: libodb - Common ODB runtime library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975312 Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||975310 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=mR4dnWj8Ana=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975318] Review Request: libodb-sqlite - SQLite ODB runtime library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975318 Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||975312 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=zdXSlwHXX3a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975315] Review Request: libodb-mysql - MySQL ODB runtime library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975315 Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||975312 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=eRGT3Dq895a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975313] Review Request: libodb-boost - Boost ODB runtime library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975313 Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||975312 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hpd6AecnQXa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975314] Review Request: libodb-mssql - Microsoft SQL Server ODB runtime library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975314 Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||975312 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=inHKDJGWRHa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975316] Review Request: libodb-qt - Qt ODB runtime library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975316 Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||975312 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=PeR3WRiYP1a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975312] Review Request: libodb - Common ODB runtime library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975312 Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bjoern.es...@gmail.com Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR), ||975313, 975314, 975315, ||975316, 975317, 975318 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=kHl6AVplUHa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975317] Review Request: libodb-pgsql - PostgreSQL ODB runtime library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975317 Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||975312 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Y7LVUuzlNZa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975313] Review Request: libodb-boost - Boost ODB runtime library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975313 Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bjoern.es...@gmail.com Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=eY3klgWzG1a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975317] Review Request: libodb-pgsql - PostgreSQL ODB runtime library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975317 Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bjoern.es...@gmail.com Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=9VT2nJs6yma=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975318] Review Request: libodb-sqlite - SQLite ODB runtime library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975318 Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bjoern.es...@gmail.com Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=baNMBdCq0na=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975316] Review Request: libodb-qt - Qt ODB runtime library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975316 Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bjoern.es...@gmail.com Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=SBvbemNyZja=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975315] Review Request: libodb-mysql - MySQL ODB runtime library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975315 Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bjoern.es...@gmail.com Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=xb4CpqbLJla=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975314] Review Request: libodb-mssql - Microsoft SQL Server ODB runtime library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975314 Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bjoern.es...@gmail.com Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=VmmdpFxYn6a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 962834] Review Request: libmetalink - a Metalink C library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962834 Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|NOTABUG |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=CPZNbhKwE0a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 973868] Re-Review Request: lifeograph - A diary program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973868 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ZBxvGiNKrYa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 973868] Re-Review Request: lifeograph - A diary program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973868 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- lifeograph-0.11.1-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lifeograph-0.11.1-2.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=0rMpAHHZ3sa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 973868] Re-Review Request: lifeograph - A diary program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973868 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- lifeograph-0.11.1-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lifeograph-0.11.1-2.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=14thMtV8bJa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 867959] Review Request: libgit2 - C library for git
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867959 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=CyC5tLJoV0a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 867959] Review Request: libgit2 - C library for git
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867959 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- libgit2-0.18.0-4.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libgit2-0.18.0-4.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=MozDSkDwNWa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975314] Review Request: libodb-mssql - Microsoft SQL Server ODB runtime library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975314 Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||182235 (FE-Legal) --- Comment #1 from Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com --- I'm not sure if this particualar plugin can be shipped with Fedora. According to [1]: | ODB is available with full source code and can be | used with open source databases (SQLite, PostgreSQL, | MySQL, etc.) as well as FREE EDITIONS of commercial databases | (Oracle Express, SQL Server Express, etc.) under the terms of | the GNU General Public License (GPL) version 2. | | ODB can also be used free of charge NON-COMMERCIALLY or for | EVALUATION with non-free editions of commercial databases (Oracle, | SQL Server, etc) under the terms of the | ODB Non-Commercial Use and Evaluation License (NCUEL). Reading this sounds like all odb-plugins are GPL'ed, but NOT MS SQL / ORACLE plugins, if used with the enterprise / commercial editions of the corresponding database. For this reason I set this to be blocked by FE-LEGAL. [1] http://www.codesynthesis.com/products/odb/license.xhtml -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=BSa2UUeqRfa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975309] Review Request: libcutl - C++ utility library from Code Synthesis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975309 --- Comment #2 from Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com --- Hi Dave! Here are some remarks/recommendations/improvement about the spec-file. This applies to your ascending/blocked pkgs, too: * Your links are not direct linking. You should upload them to somewhere direct linking is possible. If you don't have own webspace for this, you possibly want to follow the instructions given here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Upload_Your_Package After your request got approved, upload spec/srpm to there and update the Spec/SRPM URL-Tag in your bugs, please. * There are lots of obsolete BRs is the spec. Remove them, please, so the spec-file focusses on the real, additionally needed ones. See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2 * doc-subpkg explicitly requires main-pkg. This should not be the case, because the docs don't need binaries. Usually someone wants to read the docs BEFORE installing the software. * For the above reason LICENSE should be packaged withing doc-subpkg, too. According to the guidelines this is OK. See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Duplicate_Files * %defattr(-,root,root,-) is obsoleted and was only needed on rpm 4.4. Even el5 shippes a more recent version of rpm. See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_Permissions Cheers, Björn -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=7Sl7KSkYL7a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 957804] Review Request: kryo - Object graph serialization framework for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957804
Michal Srb m...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Michal Srb m...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable
Issues:
===
- Maven packages should use new style packaging
Note: If possible update your package to latest guidelines
See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#Apache_Maven
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm 4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Java:
[x]: Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x]: Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
subpackage
[x]: Javadoc subpackages should not have Requires: jpackage-utils
[x]: Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlink)
[x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build
Maven:
[x]: Pom files have correct Maven mapping
[x]: If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even
when building with ant
[x]: Old add_to_maven_depmap macro is not being used
[x]: Packages DOES NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on jpackage-
utils for %update_maven_depmap macro
[x]: Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[x]: Packages use %{_mavenpomdir} instead of %{_datadir}/maven2/poms
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]:
[Bug 974492] Review Request: php-xmlseclibs - PHP library for XML Security
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974492 --- Comment #5 from François Kooman fkoo...@tuxed.net --- I think I fixed all issues where possible. Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5515838 Spec URL: http://fkooman.fedorapeople.org/php-xmlseclibs/php-xmlseclibs.spec SRPM URL: http://fkooman.fedorapeople.org/php-xmlseclibs/php-xmlseclibs-1.3.0-5.fc18.src.rpm Thanks for your thorough review! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=irO2EL0GyZa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 974492] Review Request: php-xmlseclibs - PHP library for XML Security
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974492 --- Comment #6 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com --- [x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [!]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. Still not correct. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:PHP#Extensions_Requires PHP extensions must have a Requires on ALL of the dependent extensions. So should , according to phpci, should be, else please justify php-dom php-hash php-libxml php-mcrypt php-openssl (and remove php-xml) [!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. The request is fine but not enough. From https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text * Include a copy of what they believe the license text is intended to be... * Choose not to package that software for Fedora. So I propose to wait a little from upstream on your filed bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=UyhIBW5yvJa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975309] Review Request: libcutl - C++ utility library from Code Synthesis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975309
--- Comment #3 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com ---
* Run rpmlint -I on all packages, the src.rpm *and* the built rpms. Apply
fixes for obvious errors/warnings, ignore false positives, preferably comment
on what rpmlint reports.
Name: libcutl
Group: Development/Libraries
Rather System Environment/Libraries for base library packages, since those
contain run-time libs as opposed to -devel packages.
License:Boost
This needs a closer look, because the file LICENSE contains the MIT terms, and
several source files mention MIT licensing, too.
# Other BuildRequires from auto-buildrequires
# NOTE: The Packaging Guidelines say that some of these can be exclude, but
just
# keep them here because it's easy and then they're include for completeness
Hmmm, I'm certain lots of reviewers would insist on having you remove these.
Saying it's easy isn't convincing, because it's even easier to not list
anything expected to be available within the minimum build environment:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Exceptions_2
%packagedoc
Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
Separate documentation -doc packages typically don't require the base package.
It should be possible to install documentation without having to install a
program and all its dependencies.
%files
%{_libdir}/*.so
The *.so symlink belongs into the -devel package, because typically it's only
needed/used when building software:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Devel_Packages
There are only few exceptions where external programs would dlopen a library
via the non-versioned symlink (expect a few symbols only) and could not be
patched to open the versioned lib instead.
%files devel
%{_includedir}/cutl/*
Directory /usr/include/cutl is not included.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UnownedDirectories
%files doc
%{_datadir}/doc/libcutl/*
Directory /usr/share/doc/libcutl is not included.
Further, the size of the libcutl-doc package is 5496 bytes. Unless large API
docs are missing, I wouldn't split off these few and tiny files into a separate
-doc package, but include them within the base package.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Documentation
$ rpmls -p libcutl-doc-1.7.1-1.fc19.x86_64.rpm
-rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/libcutl/INSTALL
-rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/libcutl/LICENSE
-rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/libcutl/NEWS
-rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/libcutl/README
-rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/libcutl/version
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=XfT4Nj1QW5a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 973041] Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Build - Module::Build extension for CPANPLUS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973041 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-5.16.3-265.fc19,perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Build-0.70-2.fc19,perl-CPANPLUS-0.91.38-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-5.16.3-265.fc19,perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Build-0.70-2.fc19,perl-CPANPLUS-0.91.38-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=FHcYR5pEOja=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 834132] Review Request: subethasmtp - A SMTP mail server for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834132 gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: subethasmtp Short Description: A SMTP mail server for Java Owners: gil Branches: f18 f19 InitialCC: java-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=KeTJeioSYFa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975386] Review Request: ddate - Convert Gregorian dates to Discordian dates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975386 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: ddate -|Review Request: ddate - |Convert Gregorian dates to |Convert Gregorian dates to |Discordian dates|Discordian dates -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=fJrl076phJa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975386] New: Review Request: ddate - Convert Gregorian dates to Discordian dates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975386 Bug ID: 975386 Summary: Review Request: ddate - Convert Gregorian dates to Discordian dates Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/ddate/ddate.spec SRPM URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/ddate/ddate-0.2.1-1.fc18.src.rpm Description: This tool prints a date in the Discordian date format. Fedora Account System Username: ppisar -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=8s3O3UBbDja=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 834132] Review Request: subethasmtp - A SMTP mail server for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834132 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=RiLTaLbCqja=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 834132] Review Request: subethasmtp - A SMTP mail server for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834132 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Bh8hpL1UMNa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925987] Review Request: ghc-crypto-api - A generic interface for cryptographic operations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925987 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=rdiH0CeZmya=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 925987] Review Request: ghc-crypto-api - A generic interface for cryptographic operations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925987 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=JxrDM1kf3Ea=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 968594] Review Request: nodejs-console-dot-log - A console.log implementation that plays nice with large amounts of data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968594 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=y39IVZmnMsa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 968594] Review Request: nodejs-console-dot-log - A console.log implementation that plays nice with large amounts of data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968594 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=LvzhB5qJqqa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 957804] Review Request: kryo - Object graph serialization framework for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957804 gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it --- Thanks! Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/kryo.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/kryo-2.21-1.fc18.src.rpm - fixed license tag - installed ASL license text New Package SCM Request === Package Name: kryo Short Description: Object graph serialization framework for Java Owners: gil Branches: f18 f19 InitialCC: java-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=JrlxlY14J7a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 972605] Review Request: ghc-extensible-exceptions - Extensible exceptions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972605 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=G7fAjGh9Wpa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 972605] Review Request: ghc-extensible-exceptions - Extensible exceptions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972605 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=wy8d8g3Dx3a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 974348] Review Request: python-itsdangerous - Python library for passing trusted data to untrusted environments
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974348 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=DZOwiev79Ca=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 974348] Review Request: python-itsdangerous - Python library for passing trusted data to untrusted environments
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974348 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=C65SxBybRsa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 891170] Review Request: e_dbus - Wrappers around D-Bus for EFL based applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891170 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Unretired, please take ownership in pkgdb and submit a Package Change request for additional branches. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=izt8tHusMka=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 891170] Review Request: e_dbus - Wrappers around D-Bus for EFL based applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891170 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=sUk5C3O7j2a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 957804] Review Request: kryo - Object graph serialization framework for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957804 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=E8nR4RyOEZa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 957804] Review Request: kryo - Object graph serialization framework for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957804 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=babJ7axH42a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 834132] Review Request: subethasmtp - A SMTP mail server for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834132 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- subethasmtp-3.1.7-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/subethasmtp-3.1.7-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=dDNvju1Ha4a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 834132] Review Request: subethasmtp - A SMTP mail server for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834132 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Ai0WOV3kRza=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 957804] Review Request: kryo - Object graph serialization framework for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957804 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- kryo-2.21-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kryo-2.21-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=13sElP1g8na=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 957804] Review Request: kryo - Object graph serialization framework for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957804 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=jpjvvepGWHa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 974348] Review Request: python-itsdangerous - Python library for passing trusted data to untrusted environments
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974348 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-itsdangerous-0.21-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-itsdangerous-0.21-2.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=3WCctaeeTaa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 974348] Review Request: python-itsdangerous - Python library for passing trusted data to untrusted environments
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974348 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=KZm7ToNEONa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 974348] Review Request: python-itsdangerous - Python library for passing trusted data to untrusted environments
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974348 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-itsdangerous-0.21-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-itsdangerous-0.21-2.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ptzg5esBFva=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 974348] Review Request: python-itsdangerous - Python library for passing trusted data to untrusted environments
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974348 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-itsdangerous-0.21-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-itsdangerous-0.21-2.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=S9SkKpqK0Qa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 834132] Review Request: subethasmtp - A SMTP mail server for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834132 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- subethasmtp-3.1.7-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/subethasmtp-3.1.7-1.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=9kYIj2cMMra=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 957693] Review Request: gfal2-python - Python bindings for gfal 2.0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957693 --- Comment #5 from Adrien Devresse ade...@gmail.com --- Maybe, but by adding the appropriate tag you could solve this: Adding this tag, at least when targeting EL5, leads to a simple package compilation failure. The BuildArch tag affect the full package and not only the doc subpackage. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ZXmL83da8Ka=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 957804] Review Request: kryo - Object graph serialization framework for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957804 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- kryo-2.21-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kryo-2.21-1.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=nVYNu81jdaa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 971244] Review Request: adevs - C++ library for constructing discrete event simulation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=971244 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=6uDKYNFF7pa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 971244] Review Request: adevs - C++ library for constructing discrete event simulation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=971244 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- adevs-2.6-4.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/adevs-2.6-4.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=iLuZ29Cv9Da=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 974348] Review Request: python-itsdangerous - Python library for passing trusted data to untrusted environments
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974348 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-itsdangerous-0.21-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-itsdangerous-0.21-3.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=FvZJF5Fp0na=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 971244] Review Request: adevs - C++ library for constructing discrete event simulation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=971244 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- adevs-2.6-4.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/adevs-2.6-4.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5KOTLSRQFBa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975386] Review Request: ddate - Convert Gregorian dates to Discordian dates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975386 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||psab...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|psab...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=odoLHc6vnha=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975386] Review Request: ddate - Convert Gregorian dates to Discordian dates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975386
--- Comment #1 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com ---
You could use the tag tarballs instead of the commit, e.g.:
https://github.com/bo0ts/ddate/archive/v0.2.1.tar.gz
That will make many things somewhat less ugly.
Additionally, I'd suggest including patch c19fe89, too.
Use %{name} in URL.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=22oUVtttGVa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975386] Review Request: ddate - Convert Gregorian dates to Discordian dates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975386 --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com --- Thanks for the hints. I'm not an expert on Github user interface. Updated package is on the same address. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=PYaCc9Dmfya=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975386] Review Request: ddate - Convert Gregorian dates to Discordian dates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975386 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com --- Much better. Approving. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=RGRF0f1M7oa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 966531] Review Request: perl-App-grindperl - Command-line tool to help build and test blead perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966531 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jples...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jples...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=05nMUU8t1wa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975310] Review Request: odb - C++ Object-Relational Mapping
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975310 Boris Kolpackov bo...@codesynthesis.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|package-review@lists.fedora | |project.org | CC||bo...@codesynthesis.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=cLVvm2C1j8a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975386] Review Request: ddate - Convert Gregorian dates to Discordian dates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975386 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: ddate Short Description: Convert Gregorian dates to Discordian dates Owners: ppisar Branches: f17 f18 f19 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=tljeVcE08Qa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 891170] Review Request: e_dbus - Wrappers around D-Bus for EFL based applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891170 Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com --- Package Change Request == Package Name: e_dbus New Branches: f19 Owners: sundaram vicodan InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=cY3SBeA4aXa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975314] Review Request: libodb-mssql - Microsoft SQL Server ODB runtime library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975314 --- Comment #2 from Boris Kolpackov bo...@codesynthesis.com --- Yes, libodb-mssql is not free software and therefore probably shouldn't be included in Fedore. Plus the Microsoft Native Client, which is what libodb-mssql is based on, is not free software either. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=SJ6gcrQZRRa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 971049] Review Request: davix - Toolkit for Http-based file management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=971049 Alejandro Alvarez alejandro.alvarez.ayl...@cern.ch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alejandro.alvarez.ayllon@ce ||rn.ch Assignee|massimo.pala...@gmail.com |alejandro.alvarez.ayllon@ce ||rn.ch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=QrpoZUqmX7a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 832853] Review Request: java3d - Java 3D
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853 --- Comment #22 from Harvey Harrison harvey.harri...@gmail.com --- Looking at the remaining functions, it turns out the code in question was a java port of some c++ code that was under a much more permissive license, I'm just going to go back to the original c++ and re-port these two functions myself. Original c++: http://www.geometrictools.com/ Covered by the Boost license: http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt I believe the boost license is an acceptable Fedora license, and is GPL compatible, whom do I ask to make sure that is OK? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=uktoHIAHnNa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 966531] Review Request: perl-App-grindperl - Command-line tool to help build and test blead perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966531 --- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com --- The latest version of App-grindperl is 0.002. Please update it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=unuvCJRLJoa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 974492] Review Request: php-xmlseclibs - PHP library for XML Security
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974492 --- Comment #7 from François Kooman fkoo...@tuxed.net --- Spec URL: http://fkooman.fedorapeople.org/php-xmlseclibs/php-xmlseclibs.spec SRPM URL: http://fkooman.fedorapeople.org/php-xmlseclibs/php-xmlseclibs-1.3.0-6.fc18.src.rpm Updated the (Build)Requires according to phpci output. I hope the PEAR requirements are sufficient (as it is just used for testing). I also talked to upstream (mail) about the future of the project and they seem to be getting back to updating the code soon. I agree we should probably wait for a new release with the license stuff fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=GyT9IaMqL8a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 832853] Review Request: java3d - Java 3D
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853 --- Comment #23 from Susi Lehtola susi.leht...@iki.fi --- (In reply to Harvey Harrison from comment #22) I believe the boost license is an acceptable Fedora license, and is GPL compatible, whom do I ask to make sure that is OK? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ogzpfOzse7a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975309] Review Request: libcutl - C++ utility library from Code Synthesis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975309 --- Comment #4 from Boris Kolpackov bo...@codesynthesis.com --- License:Boost This needs a closer look, because the file LICENSE contains the MIT terms, and several source files mention MIT licensing, too. Here is the situation: most of the code in libcutl is MIT-licensed. However, also included is a small subset of Boost (essentially the Boost regex library), which is under the Boost license. While this is done to minimize dependencies, it is possible to ignore the internal Boost subset in libcutl and instead use the external libboost_regex library (the --with-external-boost configure option). I tend to think that the RPM should be built with the --with-external-boost option and then the license can probably be changed to MIT. Alternatively, the license should probably be MIT/Boost (the terms of these two licenses are very similar). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=LqsZzbeVwMa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 888385] Review Request: python-yapsy - Fat-free DIY Python plugin management toolkit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=888385
--- Comment #4 from José Matos jama...@fc.up.pt ---
(In reply to Mario Blättermann from comment #3)
The tarball contains an upstream egg, you have to delete it before building
the package so that it gets rebuilt:
%prep
%setup -q -n Yapsy-%{version}-pythons2n3
rm -rf *.egg-info
See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python_Eggs#Upstream_Eggs for
more info.
I noticed it the first time but forgot to remove it. Mea culpa. :-)
Don't mix %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in the same spec file.
I was surprised when I noticed the $ version in there. :-)
$ rpmlint -i -v *
python-yapsy.src: I: checking
python-yapsy.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US customised -
customized, customize, accustomed
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
Please fix the spelling error:
customised → customized
Done.
I have updated the package to the latest stable version together with all the
fixes you proposed.
Spec URL: http://jamatos.fedorapeople.org/python-yapsy.spec
SRPM URL: http://jamatos.fedorapeople.org/python-yapsy-1.10.2-1.fc20.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hlNXn8qnrya=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975314] Review Request: libodb-mssql - Microsoft SQL Server ODB runtime library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975314 --- Comment #3 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com --- Yeah, I agree. The NCUEL is non-free, and this code is under NCUEL, not GPL, because of the target DB. Sorry. :/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=2S7Vavn4oya=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975314] Review Request: libodb-mssql - Microsoft SQL Server ODB runtime library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975314 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||tcall...@redhat.com Resolution|--- |CANTFIX Last Closed||2013-06-18 10:36:09 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=1XZN3UvoIxa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 971049] Review Request: davix - Toolkit for Http-based file management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=971049 --- Comment #6 from Alejandro Alvarez alejandro.alvarez.ayl...@cern.ch --- In the future, if you update the srpm, please, resubmit the builds again and paste the links here. rpmlint --- $ rpmlint davix-0.2.2-1.el5.centos.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint davix-0.2.2-1.fc19.x86_64.rpm davix.x86_64: W: no-documentation davix.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary davix-ls davix.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary davix-put davix.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary davix davix.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary davix-get davix.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary davix-del 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. MUST A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. /usr/share/doc/davix-0.2.2/ /usr/share/doc/davix-0.2.2/html/ Are not owned by the rpms. SHOULD == [FAILED] Parallel make https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/Guidelines#Parallel_make [FAILED] The package should contain man pages for binaries/scripts davix include a set of binaries with no man pages Please, fix the MUST error, and have a look at the SHOULD. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Z56dD7gpEua=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
