[Bug 1156492] Review Request: golang-github-cpuguy83-go-md2man - Process markdown into manpages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1156492 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|golang-github-cpuguy83-go-m |golang-github-cpuguy83-go-m |d2man-1-2.el6 |d2man-1-4.el6 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-github-cpuguy83-go-md2man-1-4.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1153726] Review Request: golang-github-racker-perigee - REST client optimized for use with APIs for request and response bodies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1153726 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|golang-github-racker-perige |golang-github-racker-perige |e-0-0.1.git0c00cb0.fc21 |e-0-0.1.git0c00cb0.el6 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-github-racker-perigee-0-0.1.git0c00cb0.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1001396] Review Request: golang-github-kr-pty - PTY interface for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001396 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|golang-github-kr-pty-0-0.15 |golang-github-kr-pty-0-0.22 |.git3b1f648.fc20|.git05017fc.el6 --- Comment #36 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-github-kr-pty-0-0.22.git05017fc.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1196361] Review Request: golang-github-gorilla-websocket - A WebSocket implementation for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196361 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||golang-github-gorilla-webso ||cket-0-0.1.gitab5b3a6.el6 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2015-03-14 20:59:07 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-github-gorilla-websocket-0-0.1.gitab5b3a6.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1196368] Review Request: golang-github-golang-groupcache - Caching and cache-filling library as a replacement for memcached in many cases
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196368 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||golang-github-golang-groupc ||ache-0-0.1.git604ed57.el6 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2015-03-14 20:59:12 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-github-golang-groupcache-0-0.1.git604ed57.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1196432] Review Request: golang-github-beorn7-perks - Effective Computation of Things
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196432 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|golang-github-beorn7-perks- |golang-github-beorn7-perks- |0-0.1.gitb965b61.fc22 |0-0.1.gitb965b61.el6 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-github-beorn7-perks-0-0.1.gitb965b61.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1172603] Review Request: golang-github-ghodss-yaml - A better way to marshal and unmarshal YAML in Golang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172603 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|golang-github-ghodss-yaml-0 |golang-github-ghodss-yaml-0 |-0.3.git3bc1590.el6 |-0.4.git588cb43.el6 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-github-ghodss-yaml-0-0.4.git588cb43.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194032] Review Request: perl-Math-Int64 - Manipulate 64 bits integers in Perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194032 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Math-Int64-0.34-1.fc21 |perl-Math-Int64-0.34-1.el7 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Math-Int64-0.34-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1202063] Review Request: Classified ads - Internet messaging done right
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202063
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
--- Comment #1 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
_ → - in name
QMAKE_ARGS+=INCLUDEPATH+=${LOCALBASE}/include/miniupnpc/
LIBS+=-L${LOCALBASE}/lib
Since you don't export those variables this has no effect. The paths look wrong
too — they are not multiarch at least. Maybe somebody who knows how to package
qmake-qt4-based stuff will chime in.
Remove %clean, BuildRoot, unless you'll be building this also for EPEL5.
Why fontconfig in Requires?
Most likely various things in Requires are unnecessary. Dependencies on
libraries are added automatically. Try removing all of them, building the
package, looking at autogenerated requires, and maybe adding something back.
No license file?
Since this seems to be a graphical application, you need an appdata file too.
Use %{version} in URL.
Use the URL you have for Source0, and use a link to a human-readable web-page
in URL.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1196551] Review Request: golang-github-shurcooL-sanitized_anchor_name - Package sanitized_anchor_name provides a func to create sanitized anchor names
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196551 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|golang-github-shurcooL-sani |golang-github-shurcooL-sani |tized_anchor_name-0-0.1.git |tized_anchor_name-0-0.1.git |8e87604.fc21|8e87604.el6 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-github-shurcooL-sanitized_anchor_name-0-0.1.git8e87604.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1085890] Review Request: golang-github-spf13-pflag - Replacement for Go's flag package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085890 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|golang-github-spf13-pflag-0 |golang-github-spf13-pflag-0 |-0.4.gitf82776d.el6 |-0.5.git370c317.el6 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-github-spf13-pflag-0-0.5.git370c317.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194032] Review Request: perl-Math-Int64 - Manipulate 64 bits integers in Perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194032 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Math-Int64-0.34-1.el7 |perl-Math-Int64-0.34-1.el6 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Math-Int64-0.34-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1085881] Review Request: golang-github-spf13-cobra - A Commander for modern go CLI interactions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085881 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|golang-github-spf13-cobra-0 |golang-github-spf13-cobra-0 |-0.5.gite1e66f7.el6 |-0.6.gitf8e1ec5.el6 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-github-spf13-cobra-0-0.6.gitf8e1ec5.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1199693] Review Request: pcp-pmda-cpp - C++ library for PCP PMDAs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199693
--- Comment #12 from Paul Colby red...@colby.id.au ---
for the base PCP packages, we were allowed to put the source in with the
PCP_PMDAS_DIR binaries, since they're demos and its a devel package, so
consider relocating everything from pcp-pmda-cpp-examples into
/var/lib/pcp/pmdas/pcp-cpp-examples.
Done. Though I replaced 'pcp-cpp-examples' with 'pcp-pmda-cpp-examples' so
that the directory includes the full RPM package name - seems more responsible
that way :)
There are doc files in the tarball, which you could include.
Done. I've include the license file via %license and some other docs via %doc.
You can wrap the entire %clean section in the conditionals, since if
you don't need it you don't need to include an empty section.
Done :)
The group for base runtime libraries has been System Environment/
Libraries for many years. The group Development/Libraries is for the
separate -devel buildtime packages.
Your suggestion had me a little stumped at first, since these are
development-only (ie header-only) libraries. However, I eventually realised
that only the *-devel subpackage should be Development/Libraries whereas the
top-level package (which doesn't actually get built as an RPM, because it
contains no files) should/would be System Environment/Libraries if it were to
ever exist.
So I've updated the top-level Group as suggested :)
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Packaging_Header_Only_Libraries
Thanks. I hadn't noticed that section before.
I've added the *-static Provides, and removed the noarch as dictated by the
Packaging Guidelines.
Directory %{_datadir}/doc/pcp-cpp is not included, and no other package
provides it yet either (repoquery --whatprovides /usr/share/doc/pcp-cpp).
This needs to be examined.
I believe this should be fixed now, as I've moved the examples under
$PCP_PMDA_DIR (aka %{_pmdasdir}), ie /var/lib/pcp/pmdas, which is owned by the
implicitly-required 'pcp' package.
(I haven't entirely groked the RPM file/dir ownership concepts though, so might
be missing something here)
If the tests are suitable for a %check section, one should be added to
the spec file.
Done. Though that does introduce the otherwise-unnecessary build requirement
for the 'pcp' package (needed for some functional tests). Seems worth it to me
:)
This also allowed me to simplify the %build and %install steps, since they were
doing extra work to avoid building the unit tests previously. Now they just
build everything. (Of course, that does may the build take longer, but its
still pretty quick anyway).
I've updated the files at the Spec and source RPM URLs above. You can see a
diff for the Spec file changes since the last review (as well as the other
files that changed, if interested in those) at:
https://github.com/pcolby/pcp-pmda-cpp/compare/838957be550f0826179cc3cd16ab6df74d343702...5fde84b0f1468a8d7f4266e8a910b4eb74f13086#diff-25
There's now a couple of, what I believe to be benign, warnings in the
fedora-review output:
* Header files (*/domain.h) in the examples package - these are not C/C++
source header files, but rather, include files for the PCP simple
preprocessor (pmcpp).
* devel-file-in-non-devel-package *-examples/pmdas/*.cpp - as noted by Nathan
above, this follows the pre-existing convention of allowing example source code
to be included with example PMDAs. But if it bothers anyone, I'm more than
happy to simply leave those files out of the packages for now.
Thanks!
Paul.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1202063] Review Request: Classified ads - Internet messaging done right
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202063 Antti Järvinen antti.jarvi...@katiska.org changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1202064] Review Request: knock - A port-knocking server/client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202064 --- Comment #1 from Christos Triantafyllidis christos.triantafylli...@gmail.com --- The FSF address is wrong, there is a pull request on upstream's repository for this: https://github.com/jvinet/knock/pull/18 I'm going to re-pack it if/when it is merged. Cheers, Christos -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1202063] New: Review Request: Classified ads - Internet messaging done right
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202063 Bug ID: 1202063 Summary: Review Request: Classified ads - Internet messaging done right Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: antti.jarvi...@katiska.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://katiska.org/classified_ads/srpm/classified_ads.spec SRPM URL: http://katiska.org/classified_ads/srpm/classified_ads-0.04-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: Classified ads is an attempt to re-produce parts of the functionality that went away when Usenet news ceased to exist. This attempt tries to fix the problem of disappearing news-servers so that there is no servers required ; data storage is implemented inside client applications that you and me are running. Fedora Account System Username: costello This is my very first attempt to contribute to content of Fedora linux distribution. This is my own attempt to handle human-to-human communications inside internet, from end-users perspective. As a long-time internet-user this is to-day more or less the way I see how messaging should happen. Features of the program include, but are not limited to: * Sending and retrieving messages public and private, between humans or inside groups * No need for server-side support of any kind * Minimal hassle for the end-user * No need for contracts with any service-operators, not counting your ISP * Identification of message senders while allowing some withdrawal of personal details * Text-based search of public posting * Unfortunately no text-based or mobile UI yet, only Qt. * Early stage of development ; while basic functions seem to be all right there is surely bugs, features and 2 million fatal errors. As developer and user of the program I naturally will maintain it for fedora too if this piece of sw is deemed suitable for distribution. As this is my very first submission, my understanding is that I need a sponsor to review my package first. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1123579] Review Request: rubygem-colorize - Add color methods to String class
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123579
Christos Triantafyllidis christos.triantafylli...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||christos.triantafyllidis@gm
||ail.com
--- Comment #3 from Christos Triantafyllidis
christos.triantafylli...@gmail.com ---
Hello Steve,
Thank you for your time on this and I apologize for the long delay on that
(the project I needed this for got postponed a bit).
On your comments:
- gems should require rubygems package
Note: Requires: rubygems missing in rubygem-colorize-doc
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby#RubyGems
fedora-review which produced this comment
is no longer correct here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128094
submitted.
I didn't change anything on that. At any case the -doc file should not directly
require rubygems.
- It should be hopefully easy enough to get the tests to run
in %check
A simple execution of 'testrb -Ilib test' looks to do the job.
Done. I tried to use minitest but I couldn't make it run without changing
upstream's tests so I preferred to keep the Test::UNIT based ones.
- Drop the Buidrequires on rake , the guidelines say not
to use it for tests (not sure I actually agree with that but
that is what it says)
Done.
- All of the Requires and Provides should go for fc 21. They
are automatic now.
Done.
- Use %{gem_install} rather than way you have for %install.
Not sure if I got what you mean correctly here. The current ruby packaging
guide says to not do so:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby?rd=Packaging/Ruby#.25build
- The README and CHANGELOG should be the docs package I would
say.
Done.
- The files %{gem_spec} and %{gem_instdir}/%{gem_name}.gemspec are the same
I would %exclude the latter. The first is needed runtime.
Done.
In addition I upgraded it to the latest upstream (0.7.5):
https://ctria.fedorapeople.org/packaging/rubygem-colorize/rubygem-colorize.spec
https://ctria.fedorapeople.org/packaging/rubygem-colorize/rubygem-colorize-0.7.5-1.fc21.src.rpm
Cheers,
Christos
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1202064] New: Review Request: knock - A port-knocking server/client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202064 Bug ID: 1202064 Summary: Review Request: knock - A port-knocking server/client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: christos.triantafylli...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://ctria.fedorapeople.org/packaging/knock/knock.spec SRPM URL: https://ctria.fedorapeople.org/packaging/knock/knock-0.7-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: This is a port-knocking server/client. Port-knocking is a method where a server can sniff one of its interfaces for a special knock sequence of port-hits. When detected, it will run a specified event bound to that port knock sequence. These port-hits need not be on open ports, since we use libpcap to sniff the raw interface traffic. Fedora Account System Username: ctria -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194927] Review Request: nodejs-onetime - Only call a function once
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194927 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|nodejs-onetime-1.0.0-1.fc20 |nodejs-onetime-1.0.0-1.fc21 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-onetime-1.0.0-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1190442] Review Request: golang-github-prometheus-client_golang - Prometheus instrumentation library for Go applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190442 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|golang-github-prometheus-cl |golang-github-prometheus-cl |ient_golang-0-0.3.gite5098a |ient_golang-0-0.3.gite5098a |c.fc22 |c.fc20 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-github-prometheus-client_golang-0-0.3.gite5098ac.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1199693] Review Request: pcp-pmda-cpp - C++ library for PCP PMDAs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199693 --- Comment #11 from Paul Colby red...@colby.id.au --- Hi Nathan, It seems that the issue with needing pmcd is that my PMNS roots #include stdpmid, but stdpmid is not generated until pmcd runs at least once. However, it seems that the #include was unnecessary since my sample PMNS files don't depend on anything defined in stdpmid, so I'll remove that include from the examples. Cheers. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1190437] Review Request: golang-github-prometheus-client_model - Data model artifacts for Prometheus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190437 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|golang-github-prometheus-cl |golang-github-prometheus-cl |ient_model-0-0.3.gitfa8ad6f |ient_model-0-0.3.gitfa8ad6f |.fc22 |.fc20 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-github-prometheus-client_model-0-0.3.gitfa8ad6f.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1096807] Review Request: mingw-SDL2_image - MinGW Windows port of the Image loading library for SDL2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1096807 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|mingw-SDL2_image-2.0.0-4.fc |mingw-SDL2_image-2.0.0-4.fc |22 |20 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- mingw-SDL2_image-2.0.0-4.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194576] Review Request:python-docx - Lib for creating/updating docx files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194576 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-docx-0.8.5-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1190442] Review Request: golang-github-prometheus-client_golang - Prometheus instrumentation library for Go applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190442 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|golang-github-prometheus-cl |golang-github-prometheus-cl |ient_golang-0-0.3.gite5098a |ient_golang-0-0.3.gite5098a |c.fc20 |c.fc21 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-github-prometheus-client_golang-0-0.3.gite5098ac.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194927] Review Request: nodejs-onetime - Only call a function once
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194927 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|nodejs-onetime-1.0.0-1.fc22 |nodejs-onetime-1.0.0-1.fc20 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-onetime-1.0.0-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1096807] Review Request: mingw-SDL2_image - MinGW Windows port of the Image loading library for SDL2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1096807 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||mingw-SDL2_image-2.0.0-4.fc ||22 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2015-03-14 05:12:41 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- mingw-SDL2_image-2.0.0-4.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1018057] Review Request: golang-googlecode-goprotobuf - Go support for Google protocol buffers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018057 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|golang-googlecode-goprotobu |golang-googlecode-goprotobu |f-0-0.13.gitc22ae3c.fc22|f-0-0.13.gitc22ae3c.fc21 --- Comment #46 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-googlecode-goprotobuf-0-0.13.gitc22ae3c.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1190438] Review Request: golang-github-matttproud-golang_protobuf_extensions - Support for streaming Protocol Buffer messages for the Go language (golang)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190438 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|golang-github-matttproud-go |golang-github-matttproud-go |lang_protobuf_extensions-0- |lang_protobuf_extensions-0- |0.2.gitba7d65a.fc21 |0.2.gitba7d65a.fc20 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-github-matttproud-golang_protobuf_extensions-0-0.2.gitba7d65a.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1190438] Review Request: golang-github-matttproud-golang_protobuf_extensions - Support for streaming Protocol Buffer messages for the Go language (golang)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190438 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|golang-github-matttproud-go |golang-github-matttproud-go |lang_protobuf_extensions-0- |lang_protobuf_extensions-0- |0.2.gitba7d65a.fc22 |0.2.gitba7d65a.fc21 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-github-matttproud-golang_protobuf_extensions-0-0.2.gitba7d65a.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1018057] Review Request: golang-googlecode-goprotobuf - Go support for Google protocol buffers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018057 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|golang-googlecode-goprotobu |golang-googlecode-goprotobu |f-0-0.13.gitc22ae3c.fc21|f-0-0.13.gitc22ae3c.fc20 --- Comment #47 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-googlecode-goprotobuf-0-0.13.gitc22ae3c.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1198803] Review Request: golang-bitbucket-ww-goautoneg - HTTP Content-Type Autonegotiation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198803 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|golang-bitbucket-ww-goauton |golang-bitbucket-ww-goauton |eg-0-0.2.git75cd24fc2f2c.fc |eg-0-0.2.git75cd24fc2f2c.fc |20 |22 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-bitbucket-ww-goautoneg-0-0.2.git75cd24fc2f2c.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1096807] Review Request: mingw-SDL2_image - MinGW Windows port of the Image loading library for SDL2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1096807 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|mingw-SDL2_image-2.0.0-4.fc |mingw-SDL2_image-2.0.0-4.fc |20 |21 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- mingw-SDL2_image-2.0.0-4.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1198040] Review Request: gnome-characters - Character map application for GNOME
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198040
Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
Suggestions:
1) we have a license macro now so you can use it as
%doc NEWS README
%license COPYING COPYINGv2
2) Above License: tag add following lines
#Files from gtk-js-app are licensed under 3-clause BSD.
#Other files are GPL 2.0 or later.
3) Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
Note: gnome-characters : /usr/lib64/org.gnome.Characters/libgc.la
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#StaticLibraries
= Use in %install
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name '*.la' -exec rm -f {} ';'
Otherwise looks good.
APPROVED.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
