[Bug 1264686] Review Request: itpp - C++ library for math, signal/ speech processing, and communications

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264686

Eric Christensen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||needinfo?(marcodriusso@gmai
   ||l.com)



--- Comment #14 from Eric Christensen  ---
I'd like to see this package return to Fedora (it was orphaned back in F15). 
Unfortunately I cannot sponsor...

That said, maybe I can find someone who can sponsor you.  I did do a quick
automated review and found these issues.  Perhaps you could address them?

Issues:
===
- All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
  are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
  Note: These BR are not needed: gcc-c++
  See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2
- If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
  in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
  for the package is included in %license.
  Note: License file copyright.html is not marked as %license
  See:
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text

If you can fix these issues (should be a quick fix) I'll try to find someone to
sponsor you.

Thanks!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1264686] Review Request: itpp - C++ library for math, signal/ speech processing, and communications

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264686

Eric Christensen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||bugs.mich...@gmx.net,
   ||spa...@redhat.com
  Flags||needinfo?(bugs.michael@gmx.
   ||net)



--- Comment #13 from Eric Christensen  ---
Michael: Were you going to complete this review?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1375383] New: Review Request: arachne-pnr - Place and route for FPGA compilation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375383

Bug ID: 1375383
   Summary: Review Request: arachne-pnr - Place and route for FPGA
compilation
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: space...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/arachne-pnr/arachne-pnr.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/arachne-pnr/arachne-pnr-0.1-0.1.20160813git52e69ed.fc24.src.rpm
Description: Arachne-pnr implements the place and route step of the hardware
compilation process for FPGAs. It accepts as input a technology-mapped
netlist in BLIF format, as output by the Yosys synthesis suite for
example. It currently targets the Lattice Semiconductor iCE40 family
of FPGAs. Its output is a textual bitstream representation for
assembly by the IceStorm icepack command. The output of icepack is a
binary bitstream which can be uploaded to a hardware device.

Together, Yosys, arachne-pnr and IceStorm provide an fully open-source
Verilog-to-bistream tool chain for iCE40 1K and 8K FPGA development.
Fedora Account System Username: brouhaha

NOTE: this depends on icestorm, for which review request #1375380 has been
submitted.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1270622] Review Request: sdb - The string database from radare reverse engineering framework

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270622



--- Comment #6 from Michal Ambroz  ---
Hi Igor, 
thanks for additional review.

SPEC: https://rebus.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/sdb.spec
SRPM: https://rebus.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/sdb-0.10.5-3.bf6575a.fc23.src.rpm

Fixed:
>* Missing BuildRequires: gcc
>* vapi files should go under devel subpackage
>* Redundant BuildRequires: vala-devel (should be just vala)
>* Tests are not ran
>* BR: leveldb-devel is not needed unless you run tests

I Will check:
>* LDFLAGS are ignored
>* BR: nodejs-devel is not needed as you don't package nodejs lib from tree


>* %make_build and %make_install are preferred way
not mandatory and not preffered by me


Will check and report upstream (I have to change):
>* Timestamps are not preserved

>* Group tag is redundant
it is not prohibited and needed to epel


Best regards 
Michal Abroz

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1374898] Review Request: quasselc - API to access a Quassel Core in pure C

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374898



--- Comment #5 from Ben Rosser  ---
My bad, fixed that (and removed the leading zero from Release). Let's try this
again. :)

Spec URL: https://tc01.fedorapeople.org/quassel/quassel-irssi/quasselc.spec
SRPM URL:
https://tc01.fedorapeople.org/quassel/quassel-irssi/quasselc-0-1.20160909gitfcd9669.fc24.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1375380] New: Review Request: icestorm - Lattice iCE40 FPGA bitstream creation/analysis/ programming tools

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375380

Bug ID: 1375380
   Summary: Review Request: icestorm - Lattice iCE40 FPGA
bitstream creation/analysis/programming tools
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: space...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/icestorm/icestorm.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/icestorm/icestorm-0-0.1.20160904git0b4b038.fc24.src.rpm
Description: Project IceStorm aims at documenting the bitstream format of
Lattice iCE40
FPGAs and providing simple tools for analyzing and creating bitstream files.

Fedora Account System Username: brouhaha

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1364725] Review Request: python-pytest-runner - Invoke py.test as distutils command with dependency resolution

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364725

Jonathan Underwood  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||jonathan.underw...@gmail.co
   ||m



--- Comment #15 from Jonathan Underwood  ---
Any chance of pushing this to F23 as well? I'd like to enable tests in the
sshuttle package which requires pytest-runner in the buildroot

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1369213] Review Request: python-django-netjsongraph - Reusable django app for collecting and visualizing network topology

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369213

Germano Massullo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|needinfo?(germano.massullo@ |
   |gmail.com)  |



--- Comment #15 from Germano Massullo  ---
1) I am working on it
2) Please refer to discussion
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/GJKSTHCLSLKWLSFICHKI6YSLKWSYUMM2/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1123579] Review Request: rubygem-colorize - Add color methods to String class

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123579



--- Comment #19 from Germano Massullo  ---
(In reply to Fabio Alessandro Locati from comment #18)
> I can pickup the review, if Steve is not interested/active on this anymore!

I have no hope in Steve's reply

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1375222] Review Request: python-django-jsonfield - A reusable Django field that allows you to store validated JSON in your model

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375222



--- Comment #4 from Germano Massullo  ---
(In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #3)
> > # tests disabled because DB_ENGINE should be configured
> > # but during installation process this is not posssible
> it is possible. you can configure some sqlite in memory
> 

Fixed

spec file:
https://germano.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/python-django-jsonfield/python-django-jsonfield.spec

srpm file:
https://germano.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/python-django-jsonfield/python-django-jsonfield-1.0.1-1.fc24.src.rpm


> > %if 0%{?fedora} || 0%{?rhel} > 7
> > %global with_python3 1
> > %endif
> %if 0%{?rhel} && 0%{?rhel} <= 7
> %bcond_with python3
> %else
> %bcond_without python3
> %endif

There is no packaging guideline that forces bcond use

> > %{python3_sitelib}/*
> it's too generic.

There is no packaging guideline that forbids to use it, instead the Python
guidelines's mention it in the template model

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1372785] Review Request: EPEL7 ONLY python-pyOpenSSL- a python3x build of the pyOpenSSL included in the base distro

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372785



--- Comment #9 from Orion Poplawski  ---
The trick is that we need to maintain API stability in EPEL.  No idea how well
pyOpenSSL does with that.  So it's worth some thought as to what version goes
in initially.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1372785] Review Request: EPEL7 ONLY python-pyOpenSSL- a python3x build of the pyOpenSSL included in the base distro

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372785



--- Comment #8 from Jim Perrin  ---
The newer version (16.1.0) has some updated BuildRequires that I need to work
through. Would it be possible to proceed with the current el7 version, and I'll
work to bump to the newer version afterward?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708

Orion Poplawski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||or...@cora.nwra.com



--- Comment #26 from Orion Poplawski  ---
You don't need the silly rename-tarball_tss.sh script (which would need be
changed with each release anyway).  Preferred mechanism is in
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Troublesome_URLs

For most github projects we use:

Source0:   
https://github.com/01org/TPM2.0-TSS/archive/%{pkg_version}.tar.gz#/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz

but you might want:

Source0:   
https://github.com/01org/TPM2.0-TSS/archive/%{pkg_version}.tar.gz#/%{pkg_prefix}-%{pkg_version}.tar.gz

In any case, do not repack upstream tarballs unless you absolutely have to.

FWIW - %autosetup is present in EPEL6,  Bigger issue is older autoconf in EL6.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1315870] Review Request: libhfi1 - verbs userspace driver for Intel HFIs

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315870

Parag AN(पराग)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |



--- Comment #42 from Parag AN(पराग)  ---
A bug blocking FE-NEEDSPONSOR gets closed that mean this review reporter must
have been sponsored already. Hence, Removing FE-NEEDSPONSOR from this review
bug.


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1354113] Review Request: python-pytest-catchlog - py.test plugin to catch log messages ( fork of pytest-capturelog)

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354113

Orion Poplawski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|needinfo?(or...@cora.nwra.c |needinfo+
   |om) |



--- Comment #3 from Orion Poplawski  ---
Sorry for the delay, approved.

Please remove the %python3_pkgversion conditional definition - it's not needed
anymore.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1374024] Review Request: python-plotcat - Python library for plotting live serial input using matplotlib

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374024



--- Comment #7 from Parag AN(पराग)  ---
sorry I will be late in posting my further review comment here. Please wait.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1366845] Review Request: reactor - Reactive fast data framework for the JVM

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366845



--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo  ---
Spec URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/reactor.spec
SRPM URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/reactor-2.0.8-1.fc24.src.rpm

Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15603461

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1346412] Review Request: python-osc-lib - OpenStack library for writing OSC plugins

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346412



--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-osc-lib

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1315870] Review Request: libhfi1 - verbs userspace driver for Intel HFIs

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315870

dennis.dalessan...@intel.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
  Flags|needinfo?(dennis.dalessandr |
   |o...@intel.com)|
Last Closed||2016-09-12 12:29:52



--- Comment #41 from dennis.dalessan...@intel.com ---
Was able to get fedpkg build to work.

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15602698

Marking as CLOSED but not sure what it should be closed as, taking a guess,
please update if needed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1364535] Review Request: ehcache2 - Java in-process cache

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364535

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1364535] Review Request: ehcache2 - Java in-process cache

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364535



--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System  ---
ehcache2-2.10.2.2.21-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-8119dc709d

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1346412] Review Request: python-osc-lib - OpenStack library for writing OSC plugins

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346412

Haïkel Guémar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|POST
 Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
  Flags||fedora-review+




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1346412] Review Request: python-osc-lib - OpenStack library for writing OSC plugins

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346412



--- Comment #8 from Haïkel Guémar  ---
I hereby approve this package, please submit a pkgdb request.
Please request F24+ branches.

I also sponsored Alfredo in the packager group.


Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
 Note: Using prebuilt packages
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache
 (v2.0)". 10 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
 licensecheck in /home/haikel/1346412-python-osc-lib/python-osc-
 lib/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
 Note: Using prebuilt rpms.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
 process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
 provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. (koji scratch
builds)
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
 Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in python2
 -osc-lib , python2-osc-lib-tests , python-osc-lib-doc , python3-osc-
 lib , python3-osc-lib-tests
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported 

[Bug 1367699] Review Request: python-sphinx-theme-py3doc-enhanced - Theme based on the theme of https:/ /docs.python.org/3/

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367699



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-sphinx-theme-py3doc-enhanced-2.3.2-3.fc25 has been submitted as an
update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-84dd347fb5

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1367699] Review Request: python-sphinx-theme-py3doc-enhanced - Theme based on the theme of https:/ /docs.python.org/3/

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367699



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-sphinx-theme-py3doc-enhanced-2.3.2-3.fc24 has been submitted as an
update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-9c0ba28039

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1367699] Review Request: python-sphinx-theme-py3doc-enhanced - Theme based on the theme of https:/ /docs.python.org/3/

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367699

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1372064] Review Request: lulzbot-marlin-firmware - Marlin firmware files for the Lulzbot family of 3D printers

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372064



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
cura-lulzbot-20.03-2.fc24, lulzbot-marlin-firmware-20.03-2.fc24 has been pushed
to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make
note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-cbf272a739

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1373450] Review Request: esptool - A utility to communicate with the ROM bootloader in Espressif ESP8266

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373450

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CLOSED  |ON_QA
 Resolution|ERRATA  |---
   Keywords||Reopened



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
esptool-1.1-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-c1c555ac38

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1373551] Review Request: golang-github-Masterminds-semver - Work with Semantic Versions in Go

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373551



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
golang-github-Masterminds-semver-1.1.1-0.1.git8d04313.fc24 has been pushed to
the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note
of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-1799896350

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1202064] Review Request: knock - A port-knocking server/client

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202064

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CLOSED  |ON_QA
 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |---
   Keywords||Reopened



--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System  ---
knock-0.7.8-1.20151227git258a27e.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-23c3c06ca8

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1373612] Review Request: golang-github-Masterminds-vcs - VCS Repo management through a common interface in Go

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373612



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
golang-github-Masterminds-vcs-1.8.0-0.1.gitfbe9fb6.fc24 has been pushed to the
Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it
in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-2596f43683

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1373623] Review Request: glide - Package Management for Golang

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373623

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CLOSED  |ON_QA
 Resolution|ERRATA  |---
   Keywords||Reopened



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  ---
glide-0.12.1-0.1.git8032c28.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-f5961c05f6

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1366843] Review Request: openhft-chronicle-queue - Java library for persisted low latency messaging

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366843



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
openhft-chronicle-queue-3.6.2-2.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-eadd32d6ec

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1366843] Review Request: openhft-chronicle-queue - Java library for persisted low latency messaging

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366843

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1369213] Review Request: python-django-netjsongraph - Reusable django app for collecting and visualizing network topology

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369213

Igor Gnatenko  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|python-django-netjsongraph  |Review Request:
   |- Reusable django app for   |python-django-netjsongraph
   |collecting and visualizing  |- Reusable django app for
   |network topology|collecting and visualizing
   ||network topology



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1344294] Review Request: warsow-data - Game data for Warsow

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344294



--- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/warsow-data

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1366843] Review Request: openhft-chronicle-queue - Java library for persisted low latency messaging

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366843



--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/openhft-chronicle-queue

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1367699] Review Request: python-sphinx-theme-py3doc-enhanced - Theme based on the theme of https:/ /docs.python.org/3/

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367699



--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-sphinx-theme-py3doc-enhanced

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1357064] Review Request: lumina-desktop - A lightweight, portable desktop environment

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357064



--- Comment #27 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/lumina-desktop

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1375222] python-django-jsonfield - A reusable Django field that allows you to store validated JSON in your model

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375222

Germano Massullo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CLOSED  |NEW
 Resolution|DUPLICATE   |---
   Keywords||Reopened



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1375222] Review Request: python-django-jsonfield - A reusable Django field that allows you to store validated JSON in your model

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375222

Igor Gnatenko  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ignate...@redhat.com



--- Comment #3 from Igor Gnatenko  ---
> %if 0%{?fedora} || 0%{?rhel} > 7
> %global with_python3 1
> %endif
%if 0%{?rhel} && 0%{?rhel} <= 7
%bcond_with python3
%else
%bcond_without python3
%endif

> # tests disabled because DB_ENGINE should be configured
> # but during installation process this is not posssible
it is possible. you can configure some sqlite in memory

> %{python3_sitelib}/*
it's too generic.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1315870] Review Request: libhfi1 - verbs userspace driver for Intel HFIs

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315870

dennis.dalessan...@intel.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||needinfo?(dennis.dalessandr
   ||o...@intel.com)



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1315870] Review Request: libhfi1 - verbs userspace driver for Intel HFIs

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315870

dennis.dalessan...@intel.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|needinfo?(dennis.dalessandr |
   |o...@intel.com)|



--- Comment #40 from dennis.dalessan...@intel.com ---
Just an update: I've done the steps on the above page up to and including the
git push. However the "fedpkg build" is just hanging. Asking around here for
hints at if there is something I need to do, proxy related or what not, to get
it to work.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1375222] Review Request: python-django-jsonfield - A reusable Django field that allows you to store validated JSON in your model

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375222

Igor Gnatenko  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|python-django-jsonfield - A |Review Request:
   |reusable Django field that  |python-django-jsonfield - A
   |allows you to store |reusable Django field that
   |validated JSON in your  |allows you to store
   |model   |validated JSON in your
   ||model



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1375222] python-django-jsonfield - A reusable Django field that allows you to store validated JSON in your model

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375222



--- Comment #2 from Igor Gnatenko  ---
Oops, sorry. wrong bug.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1375222] python-django-jsonfield - A reusable Django field that allows you to store validated JSON in your model

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375222

Igor Gnatenko  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Last Closed||2016-09-12 10:23:49



--- Comment #1 from Igor Gnatenko  ---


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1370533 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1370533] Review Request: python-django-pgjson - PostgreSQL json field support for Django

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370533

Igor Gnatenko  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||germano.massu...@gmail.com



--- Comment #1 from Igor Gnatenko  ---
*** Bug 1375222 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1346412] Review Request: python-osc-lib - OpenStack library for writing OSC plugins

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346412



--- Comment #7 from Alfredo Moralejo  ---
New package release 1.1.0-2 adding upstream_version and fallback macro.

Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/amoralej/python-osc-lib/master/python-osc-lib.spec
SRPM URL:
https://github.com/amoralej/python-osc-lib/raw/master/python-osc-lib-1.1.0-2.fc24.src.rpm

Scratch build successful in
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15601900

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1375222] New: python-django-jsonfield - A reusable Django field that allows you to store validated JSON in your model

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375222

Bug ID: 1375222
   Summary: python-django-jsonfield - A reusable Django field that
allows you to store validated JSON in your model
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: germano.massu...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Description:
django-jsonfield is a reusable Django field that allows you to store validated
JSON in your model.
It silently takes care of serialization. To use, simply add the field to one of
your models.

spec file:
https://germano.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/python-django-jsonfield/python-django-jsonfield.spec

srpm file:
https://germano.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/python-django-jsonfield/python-django-jsonfield-1.0.1-1.fc24.src.rpm

FAS name: germano

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1270622] Review Request: sdb - The string database from radare reverse engineering framework

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270622

Michal Ambroz  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|1368855 (radare2)   |




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368855
[Bug 1368855] Review Request: radare2 - The reverse engineering framework
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1270622] Review Request: sdb - The string database from radare reverse engineering framework

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270622



--- Comment #5 from Michal Ambroz  ---
removing blocks 1368855 - radare2 right now is not possible to build with
standalone sdb. Yes I thought the same and planned it as dependency for
radare2, but I haven't found a way to unbundle it and have it as external
library in radare2.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1368855] Review Request: radare2 - The reverse engineering framework

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368855

Michal Ambroz  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On|1270622 (sdb)   |



--- Comment #2 from Michal Ambroz  ---
Unbubdling of sdb currently not supported upstream. There used to be such
option, but it is not possible right now.


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270622
[Bug 1270622] Review Request: sdb - The string database from radare reverse
engineering framework
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1373450] Review Request: esptool - A utility to communicate with the ROM bootloader in Espressif ESP8266

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373450



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
esptool-1.1-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1372825] Review Request: picketlink-bindings - PicketLink Container Bindings

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372825



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
picketlink-bindings-2.7.1-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1373450] Review Request: esptool - A utility to communicate with the ROM bootloader in Espressif ESP8266

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373450

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2016-09-12 09:23:10



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1372825] Review Request: picketlink-bindings - PicketLink Container Bindings

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372825

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2016-09-12 09:23:01



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1373623] Review Request: glide - Package Management for Golang

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373623

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2016-09-12 09:20:04



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1373623] Review Request: glide - Package Management for Golang

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373623



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
glide-0.12.1-0.1.git8032c28.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1342749] Review Request: wildfly-core - The core runtime of WildFly

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342749

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed|2016-08-18 17:19:51 |2016-09-12 09:19:12



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1342749] Review Request: wildfly-core - The core runtime of WildFly

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342749



--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  ---
wildfly-core-2.2.0-4.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1373913] Review Request: golint - Linter for Go source code

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373913



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
golint-0-0.1.gitc7bacac.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1373913] Review Request: golint - Linter for Go source code

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373913

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2016-09-12 09:18:33



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1247243] Review Request: mod_cluster - httpd modules and Tomcat/ WildFly java libraries

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247243

gil cattaneo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||punto...@libero.it
 Attachment|0   |1
#1195551 is||
   obsolete||



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1247243] Review Request: mod_cluster - httpd modules and Tomcat/ WildFly java libraries

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247243

gil cattaneo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 QA Contact|punto...@libero.it  |extras...@fedoraproject.org



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1360258] Review Request: qt5-qtserialbus - The Qt Serial Bus API

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360258



--- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter  ---
imported into rawhide

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1361340] Review Request: python-fadvise - Python interface to posix_fadvise(2)

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1361340



--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-fadvise-5.0.0-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1361340] Review Request: python-fadvise - Python interface to posix_fadvise(2)

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1361340

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed|2016-09-09 17:49:50 |2016-09-12 08:21:48



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1229903] Review Request: NetworkManager-sstp - NetworkManager VPN plugin for SSTP

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229903



--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System  ---
NetworkManager-sstp-1.2.0-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1350143] Review Request: fmt - Small, safe and fast formating library for C++

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350143



--- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System  ---
fmt-3.0.0-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1366843] Review Request: openhft-chronicle-queue - Java library for persisted low latency messaging

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366843

gil cattaneo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183
[Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1373218] Review Request: zstd - Zstd compression library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373218



--- Comment #4 from Pádraig Brady  ---
Spec URL: https://pbrady.fedorapeople.org/zstd.spec
SRPM URL: https://pbrady.fedorapeople.org/zstd-1.0.0-2.fc23.src.rpm
Description: Zstd, is a fast lossless compression algorithm,
targeting real-time compression scenarios at zlib-level compression ratio.
A zstd command line utility and libzstd are provided.
Fedora Account System Username: pbrady

All review items addressed.
Patch sources are inline in the patches now.
Thanks!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1083962] Review Request: maxscale - A database-centric proxy that works with MariaDB and MySQL

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083962

Honza Horak  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
Last Closed||2016-09-12 06:57:11



--- Comment #37 from Honza Horak  ---
Closing because comment #35. We can re-open after 3 years, once MaxScale
becomes license-clean again :)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1366843] Review Request: openhft-chronicle-queue - Java library for persisted low latency messaging

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366843



--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo  ---
Thanks for the review!

create new SCM request/s:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/7753
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/7754

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1346412] Review Request: python-osc-lib - OpenStack library for writing OSC plugins

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346412



--- Comment #6 from Alfredo Moralejo  ---
New spec and SRPM with latest library version (1.1.0) and requirements update.

Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/amoralej/python-osc-lib/master/python-osc-lib.spec
SRPM URL:
https://github.com/amoralej/python-osc-lib/raw/master/python-osc-lib-1.1.0-1.fc24.src.rpm

Scratch build successful in
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15600094

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1346412] Review Request: python-osc-lib - OpenStack library for writing OSC plugins

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346412



--- Comment #5 from Haïkel Guémar  ---
This is currently blocking the update of Fedora rawhide clients to Newton.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1373218] Review Request: zstd - Zstd compression library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373218

Igor Gnatenko  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ignate...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



--- Comment #3 from Igor Gnatenko  ---
* Missing BuildRequires: gcc
* I think you don't really need to package static library

> Source0:
> https://github.com/facebook/zstd/archive/v1.0.0.tar.gz#/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
Source0:   
https://github.com/facebook/zstd/archive/v%{version}.tar.gz#/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz

> Patch0: zstd-lib-no-rebuild.patch
Write comment where you sent this patch upstream or why it's not applicable for
upstream

> %{?__global_ldflags:LDFLAGS="%__global_ldflags"}
no need for this

> CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" LDFLAGS=$LDFLAGS make %{?_smp_mflags} -C "$dir"
CFLAGS="%{optflags}" LDFLAGS="%{__global_ldflags}" %make_build -C $dir

> make -C tests test-zstd
didn't check but I think you have to export CFLAGS/LDFLAGS here as well

> make install \
>   DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT \
>   PREFIX=%{_prefix} \
>   LIBDIR=%{_libdir}
%make_install PREFIX=%{_prefix} LIBDIR=%{_libdir}

> /usr/bin/zstd
%{_bindir}/%{name}

> /usr/bin/unzstd
%{_bindir}/un%{name}

> /usr/bin/zstdcat
%{_bindir}/%{name}cat

> /usr/share/man/man1/zstd.1.gz
%{_mandir}/man1/%{name}.1*

> /usr/share/man/man1/unzstd.1.gz
%{_mandir}/man1/un%{name}.1*

> /usr/share/man/man1/zstdcat.1.gz
%{_mandir}/man1/%{name}cat.1*

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1373218] Review Request: zstd - Zstd compression library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373218



--- Comment #2 from Pádraig Brady  ---
Spec URL: https://pbrady.fedorapeople.org/zstd.spec
SRPM URL: https://pbrady.fedorapeople.org/zstd-1.0.0-1.fc23.src.rpm
Description: Zstd, is a fast lossless compression algorithm,
targeting real-time compression scenarios at zlib-level compression ratio.
A zstd command line utility and libzstd are provided.
Fedora Account System Username: pbrady

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1374898] Review Request: quasselc - API to access a Quassel Core in pure C

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374898



--- Comment #4 from Igor Gnatenko  ---
> BuildRequires:  gcc, glib2
BuildRequires: gcc
BuildRequires: pkgconfig(glib-2.0)

* It even fails to build
* Looks like missing BuildRequires: zlib-devel (LDLIBS:=$(shell pkg-config
glib-2.0 --libs) -lz)

it doesn't matter if you have leading zero or not.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708



--- Comment #25 from yunying@intel.com ---
(In reply to Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich from comment #24)
> I meant this:
> 
> $ md5sum tpm2-tss-1.0.tar.gz 1.0-beta_1.tar.gz 
> 2cdda79640f1e2e534ff897480190686  tpm2-tss-1.0.tar.gz
> 3d6df831cee731d95ef754f6599b3a6c  1.0-beta_1.tar.gz
> 
> tpm2-tss-1.0.tar.gz was gotten from prev src.rpm.
> Now that's OK (anyway, diff see no changes in sources but still was a
> blocker).
In previous SRPM, I downloaded source tarball from upstream, uncompressed, then
change folder name manually(TPM2.0-TSS-1.0-beta_1.tar.gz ->
tpm2-tss-1.0.tar.gz) and compress it again. Without manually name change, rpm
failed to find the package with name %{name}-%{version}.tar.gz.

> 
> Little issue: I see tabs and spaces in spec. I's better use one style.
Corrected.

> 
> And please refer documentation you used to mark license for sapi headers.
> That is not an issue from me, I just don't know whether it could be marked
> as BSD or not.
Confirmed with upstream that BSD would be OK as well for sapi headers.

> 
> You used %autosetup so no epel6 builds, right?
We are trying to add this package for rawhide(latest Fedora development
version) first, so EPEL7 is enough.

Updated SPEC & SRPM:
SPEC: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/yunyings/share/master/tpm2-tss.spec
SRPMS:
https://github.com/yunyings/share/raw/master/tpm2-tss-1.0-0.1.beta1.el7.src.rpm

COPR build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/yunyings/tpm2-tss/build/452011/

@Dmitrij, please help to review again. Really appreciate.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1366843] Review Request: openhft-chronicle-queue - Java library for persisted low latency messaging

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366843

Michael Simacek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #4 from Michael Simacek  ---
Looks ok now.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708



--- Comment #24 from Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich  ---
I meant this:

$ md5sum tpm2-tss-1.0.tar.gz 1.0-beta_1.tar.gz 
2cdda79640f1e2e534ff897480190686  tpm2-tss-1.0.tar.gz
3d6df831cee731d95ef754f6599b3a6c  1.0-beta_1.tar.gz

tpm2-tss-1.0.tar.gz was gotten from prev src.rpm.
Now that's OK (anyway, diff see no changes in sources but still was a blocker).

Little issue: I see tabs and spaces in spec. I's better use one style.

And please refer documentation you used to mark license for sapi headers. That
is not an issue from me, I just don't know whether it could be marked as BSD or
not.

You used %autosetup so no epel6 builds, right?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1314851] Review Request: novaclient-os-diskconfig - Disk Config extension for python-novaclient

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314851

Christos Triantafyllidis  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED



--- Comment #2 from Christos Triantafyllidis 
 ---
Hello,

Everything looks good with that one.

Just thing to comment:
[?]: Given that both F25 and rawhide have novaclient for python3 would it be
 possible to compile it for python3 too?

Can you please check if it compiles cleanly (it should) with python3 and if so
add a python3 subpackage for F25 and above?

Following is the full review:
Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated". 2 files have unknown
 license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/ctrianta/FedoraReviews/novaclient-os-diskconfig/python-
 novaclient-os-diskconfig/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
 Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/lib/python2.7/site-
 packages/os_diskconfig_python_novaclient_ext(python2)
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[-]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
 process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
 provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: 

[Bug 1367518] Review Request: async-http-client1 - Asynchronous Http Client for Java

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367518

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
async-http-client1-1.9.39-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-032228faa1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1372999] Review Request: rubygem-http_parser.rb - Simple callback-based HTTP request/ response parser

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372999



--- Comment #9 from Vít Ondruch  ---
(In reply to Matthias Runge from comment #7)
(In reply to Yanis Guenane from comment #8)

Thank you guys.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1361340] Review Request: python-fadvise - Python interface to posix_fadvise(2)

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1361340



--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-fadvise-5.0.0-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-30d3474e91

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1361340] Review Request: python-fadvise - Python interface to posix_fadvise(2)

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1361340

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CLOSED  |ON_QA
 Resolution|ERRATA  |---
   Keywords||Reopened



--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-fadvise-5.0.0-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-74ea06d61c

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1369720] Review Request: tpm2-tools - a TPM2.0 testing tool build upon TPM2.0-TSS

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369720



--- Comment #8 from yunying@intel.com ---
(In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #7)
> (In reply to yunying.sun from comment #6)
> > Updated SPEC again, to restrict builds to ix86 & x86_64 only by adding:
> > ExclusiveArch:  %{ix86} x86_64
> > Reason for this change is tool does not support big endian arch, and has
> > been verified only on Intel x86 & x86_64.
> I would recommend to use ExcludeArch and exclude all arches which are big
> endian.

Thanks Igor for the comment. I've updated SPEC to use ExcludeArch instead of
ExclusiveArch.

Besides, there're also some other changes from tpm2-tss comments: updated
Source0 url to match actual upstream package, add a script to rename tarball
when needed, use %autosetup instead of %setup and add "-n" to specify the
uncompressed folder name.

SPEC: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/yunyings/share/master/tpm2-tools.spec
SRPMS:
https://github.com/yunyings/share/raw/master/tpm2-tools-1.1-0.1.beta1.el7.src.rpm
COPR build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/yunyings/tpm2-tools/build/451937/

@Igor, could you help to review again? Thanks.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1367699] Review Request: python-sphinx-theme-py3doc-enhanced - Theme based on the theme of https:/ /docs.python.org/3/

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367699



--- Comment #8 from Julien Enselme  ---
Thanks for the review. If you have packages to review, please assign me to
them, I should be able to do a review this week.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1369708] Review Request: tpm2-tss - TPM2.0 Software Stack

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708



--- Comment #23 from yunying@intel.com ---
(In reply to Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich from comment #22)
> There is no way to get sources via URL in Source0 tag. Moreover, sources in
> src.rpm differs from upstream.

Thanks for reminding, Dmitrij.

When downloaded through web, the source package name(1.0-beta_1) in url is
different with the downloaded tarball name(TPM2.0-TSS-1.0-beta_1).
While if download using wget, the downloaded package name is same with url
name(1.0-beta_1).

I added a script to rename downloaded package name, just for the web download
issue. There're also some other changes: updated ExcludeArch, use autosetup
instead of setup, use "-n" to specify the uncompressed folder name during
autosetup.

SPEC & SRPM has been updated:
SPEC: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/yunyings/share/master/tpm2-tss.spec
SRPMS:
https://github.com/yunyings/share/raw/master/tpm2-tss-1.0-0.1.beta1.el7.src.rpm

Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15597272
COPR build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/yunyings/tpm2-tss/build/451936/

Please help to review again. Thanks.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1372999] Review Request: rubygem-http_parser.rb - Simple callback-based HTTP request/ response parser

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372999



--- Comment #8 from Yanis Guenane  ---
@Vit, @Igor, entirely my fault. I have checked for pending reviews for other
packages I've done lately but I have forgot to check for other ones. I will
make sure it doesn't happen again.

@Matthias, will offer that to the owner of the other review.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1350143] Review Request: fmt - Small, safe and fast formating library for C++

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350143



--- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System  ---
fmt-3.0.0-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1361340] Review Request: python-fadvise - Python interface to posix_fadvise(2)

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1361340



--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-fadvise-5.0.0-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org