[Bug 1378341] Review Request: fedpkg-copr - copr dist-git client

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378341

cl...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE
Last Closed||2016-10-06 01:30:35



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1366047] Review Request: tss2 - IBM's TSS 2.0

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366047



--- Comment #41 from l...@us.ibm.com ---
Fedora Account System Username: honclo

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1220103] Review Request: rubygem-espeak-ruby - API for utilizing ‘espeak’ to convert Text to audio file

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220103



--- Comment #3 from Athos Ribeiro  ---
ping

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1366047] Review Request: tss2 - IBM's TSS 2.0

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366047



--- Comment #40 from l...@us.ibm.com ---
(In reply to Tomas Mraz from comment #37)
> Please remove the %defattr(0644,root,root,-) in the -devel subpackage, this
> is causing:
> 
> tss2-devel.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/tss2-devel 644
> 
> This can be corrected before the import.
> 
> Please also fill the ExcludeArch bugs as required by
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/
> Guidelines#Architecture_Build_Failures
> 
Done.

Updated spec: https://honclo.fedorapeople.org/tss2.spec
Updated srpm: https://honclo.fedorapeople.org/tss2-713-7.fc24.src.rpm
Updated Koji output:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15960383
Updated COPR output:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/honclo/TSS2/build/461625/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1375735] Review Request: python-asciitree - Draws ASCII trees

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375735



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-asciitree-0.3.3-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-289cfbc923

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1378740] Review Request: python-pytest-faulthandler - py.test plugin that activates the fault handler module for tests

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378740

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ON_QA



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-pytest-faulthandler-1.3.0-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-f12d97bc22

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1379254] Review Request: python-docker-pycreds - Python bindings for the docker credentials store API

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379254



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-docker-pycreds-0.2.1-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-e4c91eeb23

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1380156] Review Request: php-webmozart-path-util - Cross-platform utilities for file paths

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380156



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-webmozart-assert-1.1.0-1.fc24, php-webmozart-path-util-2.3.0-1.fc24 has
been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist,
please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-b5d86dbd93

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1380155] Review Request: php-webmozart-assert - Assertions to validate method input/ output with nice error messages

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380155



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-webmozart-assert-1.1.0-1.fc24, php-webmozart-path-util-2.3.0-1.fc24 has
been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist,
please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-b5d86dbd93

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1380155] Review Request: php-webmozart-assert - Assertions to validate method input/ output with nice error messages

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380155



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-webmozart-assert-1.1.0-1.fc23, php-webmozart-path-util-2.3.0-1.fc23 has
been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist,
please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-d6f1b38df0

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1375735] Review Request: python-asciitree - Draws ASCII trees

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375735



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-asciitree-0.3.3-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-43f233d02a

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1380156] Review Request: php-webmozart-path-util - Cross-platform utilities for file paths

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380156



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-webmozart-assert-1.1.0-1.fc23, php-webmozart-path-util-2.3.0-1.fc23 has
been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist,
please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-d6f1b38df0

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1366047] Review Request: tss2 - IBM's TSS 2.0

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366047

l...@us.ibm.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||238953
   ||(FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64)




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238953
[Bug 238953] ExcludeArch Tracker for ppc64
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1366047] Review Request: tss2 - IBM's TSS 2.0

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366047

l...@us.ibm.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||485231
   ||(F-ExcludeArch-s390x)




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485231
[Bug 485231] ExcludeArch Tracker for s390x
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1375735] Review Request: python-asciitree - Draws ASCII trees

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375735



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-asciitree-0.3.3-3.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-dad9403bad

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1380156] Review Request: php-webmozart-path-util - Cross-platform utilities for file paths

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380156



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-webmozart-assert-1.1.0-1.el7, php-webmozart-path-util-2.3.0-1.el7 has been
pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist,
please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-218a53a120

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1380155] Review Request: php-webmozart-assert - Assertions to validate method input/ output with nice error messages

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380155



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-webmozart-assert-1.1.0-1.el7, php-webmozart-path-util-2.3.0-1.el7 has been
pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist,
please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-218a53a120

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1348202] Review Request: rubygem-pcaprub - libpcap bindings for ruby

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348202



--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-pcaprub-0.12.4-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1372938] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-amdgpu - X.Org X11 amdgpu video driver

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372938

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CLOSED  |ON_QA
 Resolution|ERRATA  |---
   Keywords||Reopened



--- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System  ---
libXfont2-2.0.1-2.fc25, tigervnc-1.7.0-3.fc25, xorg-x11-drivers-7.7-18.fc25,
xorg-x11-drv-amdgpu-1.1.2-3.20160929git97d7386c.fc25,
xorg-x11-drv-armsoc-1.4.0-3.20160929.fc25,
xorg-x11-drv-ati-7.7.1-1.20160928git3fc839ff.fc25,
xorg-x11-drv-dummy-0.3.6-26.fc25, xorg-x11-drv-evdev-2.10.4-1.fc25,
xorg-x11-drv-fbdev-0.4.3-25.fc25, xorg-x11-drv-fbturbo-0.5.1-0.8.20150221.fc25,
xorg-x11-drv-freedreno-1.4.0-3.20160929.fc25,
xorg-x11-drv-geode-2.11.18-2.fc25,
xorg-x11-drv-intel-2.99.917-26.20160929.fc25,
xorg-x11-drv-ivtv-1.2.0-0.22.fc25,
xorg-x11-drv-libinput-0.19.1-3.20160929.fc25,
xorg-x11-drv-nouveau-1.0.13-1.fc25, xorg-x11-drv-omap-0.4.4-3.fc25,
xorg-x11-drv-openchrome-0.5.0-2.fc25, xorg-x11-drv-opentegra-0.7.0-8.fc25,
xorg-x11-drv-qxl-0.1.4-10.20160929gite13d28ee.fc25,
xorg-x11-drv-sisusb-0.9.6-24.fc25,
xorg-x11-drv-synaptics-1.8.99.1-2.20160929git48632211.fc25,
xorg-x11-drv-v4l-0.2.0-47.fc25, xorg-x11-drv-vesa-2.3.2-25.fc25,
xorg-x11-drv-vmware-13.0.2-12.20150211git8f0cf7c.fc25,
xorg-x11-drv-voodoo-1.2.5-25.fc25,
xorg-x11-drv-wacom-0.33.0-2.20160929gitb61d1711.fc25,
xorg-x11-font-utils-7.5-32.fc25, xorg-x11-proto-devel-7.7-20.fc25,
xorg-x11-server-1.19.0-0.2.20160929.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-a5c3ebe67a

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1375735] Review Request: python-asciitree - Draws ASCII trees

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375735

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-asciitree-0.3.3-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-7aa4c30292

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1379254] Review Request: python-docker-pycreds - Python bindings for the docker credentials store API

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379254

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|ON_QA



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-docker-pycreds-0.2.1-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-9a3a8e9dd8

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1380155] Review Request: php-webmozart-assert - Assertions to validate method input/ output with nice error messages

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380155

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-webmozart-assert-1.1.0-1.fc25, php-webmozart-path-util-2.3.0-1.fc25 has
been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist,
please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-25bc66dde6

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1380156] Review Request: php-webmozart-path-util - Cross-platform utilities for file paths

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380156

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-webmozart-assert-1.1.0-1.fc25, php-webmozart-path-util-2.3.0-1.fc25 has
been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist,
please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-25bc66dde6

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1298131] Review Request: python-azure-storage - Microsoft Azure Storage Library for Python

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298131



--- Comment #2 from Mohamed El Morabity  ---
Update to 0.33.0


Spec URL:
https://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-azure-storage/python-azure-storage.spec
SRPM URL:
https://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-azure-storage/python-azure-storage-0.33.0-1.fc23.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1382152] New: Review Request: orpie - scientific calculator

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382152

Bug ID: 1382152
   Summary: Review Request: orpie - scientific calculator
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: jared-wall...@us.ibm.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL:
https://bitbucket.org/jared-wallace/orpie/src/2abe80a8c1e7e7c7a72056e14d72380828ccd937/SPECS/orpie.spec?at=master=file-view-default

SRPM URL:
https://bitbucket.org/jared-wallace/orpie/src/2abe80a8c1e7e7c7a72056e14d72380828ccd937/SRPMS/orpie-1.5.2-1.src.rpm?at=master=file-view-default

Description: Orpie is a full-screen console-based RPN calculator that uses the
curses library.  Its operation is similar to that of modern HP calculators, but
data entry has been optimized for efficiency on a PC keyboard. Its features
include extensive scientific calculator functionality, command completion, and
a visible interactive stack.

Fedora Account System Username:jaredwallace

Copr link: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jaredwallace/Orpie/

Koji build F24: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15957709
Koji build F25: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15958269

This is my first package, so looks like I'll need a sponsor. There are three
warnings from rpmlint. Two appear to be false positive based on:
https://github.com/pelzlpj/orpie/issues/7
and
https://github.com/pelzlpj/orpie/issues/8
The third is because the license is outdated:
https://github.com/pelzlpj/orpie/issues/6

The source required a patch workaround to build:
https://bitbucket.org/jared-wallace/orpie/src/2abe80a8c1e7e7c7a72056e14d72380828ccd937/SOURCES/patch-gsl-mgsl_sf.c.diff?at=master=file-view-default
That in theory removes a tiny bit of functionality, but the code in question is
for a pretty obscure feature and doesn't seem to be too impactful. Upstream is
aware:
https://github.com/pelzlpj/orpie/issues/1#issuecomment-249069637

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1382152] Review Request: orpie - scientific calculator

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382152



--- Comment #1 from Jared Wallace  ---
Another side note: packaging guidelines require a bug to be filed when the
package in question does not build on a particular architecture. This will not
build on armv7hl but I don't see how to file a bug against a package that's not
actually in Fedora right now.

Reason for not building is here:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/7112/15957112/build.log

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1366355] Review Request: acme-tiny - Tiny auditable ACME script for Let's Encrypt

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366355



--- Comment #24 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/acme-tiny

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1259486] Review Request: libglvnd - The GL Vendor-Neutral Dispatch library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259486



--- Comment #22 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/libglvnd

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1378028] Review Request: perl-MCE-Shared - MCE extension for sharing data, supporting threads and processes

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378028



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-MCE-Shared-1.805-3.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-f5fd66e5fa

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1366355] Review Request: acme-tiny - Tiny auditable ACME script for Let's Encrypt

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366355



--- Comment #23 from Stuart D Gathman  ---
Oh my.  I didn't see that the package was approved!  I'll address those nits
and get it out there.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1381303] Review Request: perl-LaTeX-ToUnicode - Convert LaTeX commands to Unicode

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381303

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-BibTeX-Parser-0.69-1.fc25, perl-LaTeX-ToUnicode-0.04-1.fc25,
texlive-2016-5.20160520.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-50a2bc7997

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1381307] Review Request: perl-BibTeX-Parser - Pure Perl BibTeX parser

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381307

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-BibTeX-Parser-0.69-1.fc25, perl-LaTeX-ToUnicode-0.04-1.fc25,
texlive-2016-5.20160520.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-50a2bc7997

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1380540] Review Request: votca-xtp - VOTCA excitation and charge properties module

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380540

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
votca-xtp-1.4-0.2rc1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-5ef1f0c73b

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1380420] Review Request: gomtree - Go CLI tool for mtree support

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380420



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
gomtree-0-0.2.git8c6b32c.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-8cdf84f347

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1381935] Review Request: python-distro - Linux Distribution - a Linux OS platform information API

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381935



--- Comment #6 from Neal Gompa  ---
Comments and issues:

* A simpler way to do the %install phase is to simply re-order it so that
%py2_install occurs first, then %py3_install next. That should properly
overwrite /usr/bin/distro. After all, the only case where you have
/usr/bin/distro point to Python 2 is when the Python 3 subpackage doesn't
exist.

* The conditional inside the Python 3 subpackage conditional for the files list
is redundant. You're already going to have /usr/bin/distro in the python3
subpackage if it's being built.

* Your rpm changelog is in the wrong format (lacks email address) and has a
duplicate entry rather than unique entries.

* It's fine with not using a macro for the description. That's purely a
preference. You've fixed the description in each subpackage, which is enough.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1381029] Review Request: more-itertools - Python library for efficient use of itertools utility in python

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381029



--- Comment #4 from Ranjan Maitra  ---
New files posted:

Spec URL: http://www.public.iastate.edu/~maitra/Fedora/more-itertools.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.public.iastate.edu/~maitra/Fedora/python-more-itertools-2.2-2.fc24.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 961642] Review Request: ubuntu-font-family - The fonts used in Ubuntu Linux

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961642



--- Comment #14 from Tom "spot" Callaway  ---
Arguably, the "best" approach would be to use a standard and recognized font
license, like the SIL OFL, but I imagine that is unlikely to occur. This hybrid
license is inconsistent, and the text does not reflect the intent.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1373218] Review Request: zstd - Zstd compression library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373218



--- Comment #18 from Pádraig Brady  ---
I wasn't sure how supported this was, or if it might be temporary in nature,
with the functionality being added to the main zstd util? I'll ask upstream...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1366047] Review Request: tss2 - IBM's TSS 2.0

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366047



--- Comment #39 from l...@us.ibm.com ---
(In reply to Tomas Mraz from comment #38)
> I have also sponsored you into Fedora packager group.

Thank you very much for your reviews and willingness to sponsor me into the
Feodra packager group!  I'll be taking care of the follow-up work in the
previous comment.
Thanks,
Vicky

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1366355] Review Request: acme-tiny - Tiny auditable ACME script for Let's Encrypt

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366355



--- Comment #22 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek  ---
Ping?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1259486] Review Request: libglvnd - The GL Vendor-Neutral Dispatch library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259486

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|POST
  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #21 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek  ---
+ package name is OK
+ license is acceptable (MIT)
+ license is specified correctly (afaict)
+ provides/requires look sane
+ scriptlets are OK
+ latest vesion
+ builds and install OK

Package is APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1381029] Review Request: more-itertools - Python library for efficient use of itertools utility in python

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381029



--- Comment #3 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek  ---
Tuple unpacking in parameter lists is gone in python3. But 2to3 takes care of
the translation. Unfortunately it seems you need a separate build dirs for the
two versions. It seem easiest to just copy the sources twice:

# spec file for package python-more-itertools
# https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Example_common_spec
%global srcname more-itertools
%global sum Python library for efficient use of itertools utility

Name:   python-%{srcname}
Version:2.2
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:%{sum}
License:MIT
URL:https://github.com/erikrose/more-itertools
Source0:   
https://pypi.python.org/packages/3d/4d/5900efaab46680e3c6c7a2fd87e4531f87e101ec35f6941621dc7f097e82/%{srcname}-%{version}.tar.gz
BuildArch:  noarch
BuildRequires:  python-devel
BuildRequires:  python-nose
BuildRequires:  python3-devel
BuildRequires:  python3-nose

%description
Opensource python library wrapping around itertools. Package also includes
implementations of the recipes from the itertools documentation.

See https://pythonhosted.org/more-itertools/index.html for documentation.

%package -n python2-%{srcname}
Summary:%{sum}
%{?python_provide:%python_provide python2-%{srcname}}

%description -n python2-%{srcname}
Opensource python library wrapping around itertools. Package also includes
implementations of the recipes from the itertools documentation.

See https://pythonhosted.org/more-itertools/index.html for documentation.

%package -n python3-%{srcname}
Summary:%{sum}
%{?python_provide:%python_provide python2-%{srcname}}

%description -n python3-%{srcname}
Opensource python library wrapping around itertools. Package also includes
implementations of the recipes from the itertools documentation.

See https://pythonhosted.org/more-itertools/index.html for documentation.

%prep
%autosetup -n %{srcname}-%{version} -a0

%build
%py2_build
(cd more-itertools-%{version}/ && %py3_build)

%install
%py2_install
(cd more-itertools-%{version}/ && %py3_install)

%check
%{__python2} -m nose build/lib/ -v
%{__python3} -m nose more-itertools-%{version}/build/lib/ -v

%files -n python2-%{srcname}
%license LICENSE
%doc README.rst PKG-INFO
%{python2_sitelib}/more_itertools/
%{python2_sitelib}/more_itertools-%{version}-py%{python2_version}.egg-info

%files -n python3-%{srcname}
%license LICENSE
%doc README.rst PKG-INFO
%{python3_sitelib}/more_itertools/
%{python3_sitelib}/more_itertools-%{version}-py%{python3_version}.egg-info

%changelog
* Wed Oct 5 2016 aarem AT fedoraproject DOT org - 2.2-2
- initial packaging of 2.2 version

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1279087] Review Request: sharpfont - Cross-platform FreeType bindings

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279087

Pravin Satpute  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CLOSED  |ASSIGNED
 Resolution|RAWHIDE |---
   Keywords||Reopened



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1159091] Review Request: openra - Libre/ Free Real Time Strategy project [+Tracker to unbundle all dependencies]

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159091
Bug 1159091 depends on bug 1279087, which changed state.

Bug 1279087 Summary: Review Request: sharpfont - Cross-platform FreeType 
bindings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279087

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CLOSED  |ASSIGNED
 Resolution|RAWHIDE |---



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1279087] Review Request: sharpfont - Cross-platform FreeType bindings

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279087

Pravin Satpute  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||psatp...@redhat.com



--- Comment #13 from Pravin Satpute  ---
Any plan to push this package to Fedora 25 and Fedora 24? 
You need to follow : https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/ process

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1381661] Review Request: obs-build - A generic package build script

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381661



--- Comment #5 from Miroslav Suchý  ---
> I do intend to try to package the rest of OBS, and I've seen Josef's thesis 
> before. I've addressed the Net::RabbitMQ issue before OBS 2.7 was 
> released[1], so that unblocks the OBS backend. I'm going to evaluate what the 
> state of these things are for API and frontend, soon.

Nice. Thank you for doing this.

> I trust that the tag information is correct.

I learned that OBS sometimes inherit long history, which was not 100% correct
originally. Can you please check it?

Here is complete output of licensecheck:

*No copyright* GPL
--
obs-build-20160809/Build/LiveBuild.pm
obs-build-20160809/build-recipe-livebuild
obs-build-20160809/build-recipe-snapcraft

GPL
---
obs-build-20160809/Build.pm
obs-build-20160809/Build/Arch.pm
obs-build-20160809/Build/Archrepo.pm
obs-build-20160809/Build/Collax.pm
obs-build-20160809/Build/Deb.pm
obs-build-20160809/Build/Debrepo.pm
obs-build-20160809/Build/Kiwi.pm
obs-build-20160809/Build/Mdkrepo.pm
obs-build-20160809/Build/Repo.pm
obs-build-20160809/Build/Rpm.pm
obs-build-20160809/Build/Rpmmd.pm
obs-build-20160809/Build/Snapcraft.pm
obs-build-20160809/Build/Susetags.pm
obs-build-20160809/Build/Zypp.pm
obs-build-20160809/build
obs-build-20160809/build-pkg-deb
obs-build-20160809/build-pkg-rpm
obs-build-20160809/build-recipe
obs-build-20160809/build-recipe-arch
obs-build-20160809/build-recipe-debbuild
obs-build-20160809/build-recipe-debootstrap
obs-build-20160809/build-recipe-dsc
obs-build-20160809/build-recipe-kiwi
obs-build-20160809/build-recipe-mock
obs-build-20160809/build-recipe-preinstallimage
obs-build-20160809/build-recipe-spec
obs-build-20160809/build-vm
obs-build-20160809/build-vm-docker
obs-build-20160809/build-vm-ec2
obs-build-20160809/build-vm-emulator
obs-build-20160809/build-vm-kvm
obs-build-20160809/build-vm-lxc
obs-build-20160809/build-vm-openstack
obs-build-20160809/build-vm-qemu
obs-build-20160809/build-vm-uml
obs-build-20160809/build-vm-xen
obs-build-20160809/build-vm-zvm
obs-build-20160809/changelog2spec
obs-build-20160809/common_functions
obs-build-20160809/computeblocklists
obs-build-20160809/createarchdeps
obs-build-20160809/createdirdeps
obs-build-20160809/createmdkdeps
obs-build-20160809/createrepomddeps
obs-build-20160809/createyastdeps
obs-build-20160809/createzyppdeps
obs-build-20160809/debtransform
obs-build-20160809/debtransformbz2
obs-build-20160809/debtransformzip
obs-build-20160809/download
obs-build-20160809/emulator/emulator.sh
obs-build-20160809/expanddeps
obs-build-20160809/extractbuild
obs-build-20160809/getbinaryid
obs-build-20160809/init_buildsystem
obs-build-20160809/initvm.c
obs-build-20160809/killchroot
obs-build-20160809/listinstalled
obs-build-20160809/mkbaselibs
obs-build-20160809/mkdrpms
obs-build-20160809/order
obs-build-20160809/queryconfig
obs-build-20160809/signdummy
obs-build-20160809/spec2changelog
obs-build-20160809/spec_add_patch
obs-build-20160809/spectool
obs-build-20160809/substitutedeps
obs-build-20160809/t/dist
obs-build-20160809/t/live-build
obs-build-20160809/unrpm
obs-build-20160809/vc

GPL (v2)

obs-build-20160809/build-pkg
obs-build-20160809/build-pkg-arch

GPL (with incorrect FSF address)

obs-build-20160809/test/common

Unknown or generated

obs-build-20160809/Build/SimpleXML.pm
obs-build-20160809/COPYING
obs-build-20160809/Makefile
obs-build-20160809/README
obs-build-20160809/build-recipe-collax
obs-build-20160809/build-recipe-simpleimage
obs-build-20160809/build-vm-pvm
obs-build-20160809/createdebdeps
obs-build-20160809/debtransformxz
obs-build-20160809/qemu-reg
obs-build-20160809/runservices
obs-build-20160809/telnet_login_wrapper
obs-build-20160809/test-debtransform/run.sh
obs-build-20160809/test/config
obs-build-20160809/test/testbuild.sh

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1363923] Review Request: springframework4 - Spring Java Application Framework

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1363923



--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo  ---
Spec URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/springframework4.spec
SRPM URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/springframework4-4.1.9-1.fc24.src.rpm

- fix for CVE-2016-5007, see https://pivotal.io/security/cve-2016-5007
- add tomcat-websocket support

Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15954972

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1381935] Review Request: python-distro - Linux Distribution - a Linux OS platform information API

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381935



--- Comment #5 from Miroslav Suchý  ---
Updated:
Spec URL: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/python-distro/python-distro.spec
SRPM URL:
http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/python-distro/python-distro-1.0.0-5.fc24.src.rpm

I am now generating just python2 subpackage on EL6,7.

/usr/bin/distro now use python3 on fedoras.

I chosen to not use macro for description. This way it more readable and
maintainable for me. I hope this is not a problem.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1373218] Review Request: zstd - Zstd compression library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373218

Christian Kujau  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||li...@nerdbynature.de



--- Comment #17 from Christian Kujau  ---
The zstd sources also contain a multithreaded version, pzstd. Can this be
included in the zstd Fedora package as well?

  git clone https://github.com/facebook/zstd.git && cd zstd
  make && make -C contrib/pzstd/

...would build both executables.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1381935] Review Request: python-distro - Linux Distribution - a Linux OS platform information API

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381935



--- Comment #4 from Miroslav Suchý  ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #2)
> * You are hard-requiring /bin/lsb_release, which upstream says is not
> necessary. Please downgrade it to Recommends, as the lsb package has a large
> web of dependencies that people may not necessarily want.

There is a traceback when the binary is not available. So for now, I want to
have there hard requires. I will flip it to Recommends once resolved.

> * If you intend to package this for EPEL, you'll need to do a little bit
> more work to support Python 3 in EPEL 6/7. For reference, here's a couple of
> examples[1][2].

I plan to create only python2 subpackage for el6 and el7.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1271193] Review Request: osgi-compendium - Interfaces and Classes for use in compiling OSGi bundles

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193



--- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/osgi-compendium

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1264660] Review Request: rubygem-mini_magick - Manipulate images

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264660



--- Comment #5 from Vít Ondruch  ---
You don't specify runtime dependency on any of GraphicsMagick or ImageMagick.
Shouldn't you choose one? Which is preferred? Shouldn't you use "Recommends" to
make this working out of the box?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1381892] Review Request: osgi-core - OSGi Core API

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381892



--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/osgi-core

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1381892] Review Request: osgi-core - OSGi Core API

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381892

Michael Simacek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|182235 (FE-Legal)   |



--- Comment #7 from Michael Simacek  ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #5)
> Please, add Richard Fontana email as an attachment

The email body is in comment #1.


Thank you for the review.


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182235
[Bug 182235] Fedora Legal Tracker
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1381892] Review Request: osgi-core - OSGi Core API

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381892

gil cattaneo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1381892] Review Request: osgi-core - OSGi Core API

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381892



--- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo  ---
as for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193#c14 "Lifting
FE-Legal"

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1264656] Review Request: rubygem-ace-rails-ap - The Ajax.org Cloud9 Editor.

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264656



--- Comment #8 from Vít Ondruch  ---
(In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #6)
> BTW how are you going address the bundling?

You still have not addressed this concern ^^. If you are going to keep the
bundled library, then you should at minimum:

1) Explain the reasons why.
2) Add the "bundled" provide.
3) Update the license, since the ACE appears to be of some BSD license.


[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bundled_Libraries#Requirement_if_you_bundle

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1271193] Review Request: osgi-compendium - Interfaces and Classes for use in compiling OSGi bundles

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193

gil cattaneo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1271193] Review Request: osgi-compendium - Interfaces and Classes for use in compiling OSGi bundles

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193

Tom "spot" Callaway  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|182235 (FE-Legal)   |



--- Comment #14 from Tom "spot" Callaway  ---
If Richard feels that these files are Apache without issue, I'm content with
that. Lifting FE-Legal.


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182235
[Bug 182235] Fedora Legal Tracker
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1381892] Review Request: osgi-core - OSGi Core API

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381892



--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo  ---
Please, add Richard Fontana email as an attachment

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1381892] Review Request: osgi-core - OSGi Core API

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381892

gil cattaneo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183
[Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1271193] Review Request: osgi-compendium - Interfaces and Classes for use in compiling OSGi bundles

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193

gil cattaneo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183
[Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1271193] Review Request: osgi-compendium - Interfaces and Classes for use in compiling OSGi bundles

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193



--- Comment #13 from gil cattaneo  ---
Blocker:

[?]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
   Waiting for Fedora Legal resolution

[?]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
   As above

Package is approved, but for the inclusion in Fedora we need A FE-Legal
response

Please, add Richard Fontana email as an attachment

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1271193] Review Request: osgi-compendium - Interfaces and Classes for use in compiling OSGi bundles

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193

gil cattaneo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED



--- Comment #12 from gil cattaneo  ---
Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

Generic:
[?]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
   Waiting for Fedora Legal resolution
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated". 62 files have unknown
 license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/gil/1271193-osgi-
 compendium/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[?]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
   As above
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Java:
[x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build
[x]: Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
 Note: Maven packages do not need to (Build)Require jpackage-utils. It
 is pulled in by maven-local
[x]: Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
 subpackage
[x]: Javadoc subpackages should not have Requires: jpackage-utils
[x]: Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlink)

Maven:
[x]: If package contains pom.xml files install it (including metadata) even
 when building with ant
[x]: POM files have correct Maven mapping
[x]: Maven packages should use new style packaging
[x]: Old add_to_maven_depmap macro is not being used
[x]: Packages DO NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on jpackage-
 utils for %update_maven_depmap macro
[x]: Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[x]: Packages use .mfiles file list instead of %{_datadir}/maven2/poms

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager 

[Bug 1381892] Review Request: osgi-core - OSGi Core API

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381892



--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo  ---
Blocker:

[?]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
   Waiting for Fedora Legal resolution

[?]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
   As above

Package is approved, but for the inclusion in Fedora we need A FE-Legal
response

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1366047] Review Request: tss2 - IBM's TSS 2.0

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366047

Tomas Mraz  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |



--- Comment #38 from Tomas Mraz  ---
I have also sponsored you into Fedora packager group.


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1381892] Review Request: osgi-core - OSGi Core API

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381892

gil cattaneo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED



--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo  ---
Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

Generic:
[?]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
   Waiting for Fedora Legal resolution
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated". 22 files have unknown
 license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/gil/1381892-osgi-
 core/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[?]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
   As above
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Java:
[x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build
[x]: Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
 Note: Maven packages do not need to (Build)Require jpackage-utils. It
 is pulled in by maven-local
[x]: Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
 subpackage
[x]: Javadoc subpackages should not have Requires: jpackage-utils
[x]: Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlink)

Maven:
[x]: If package contains pom.xml files install it (including metadata) even
 when building with ant
[x]: POM files have correct Maven mapping
[x]: Maven packages should use new style packaging
[x]: Old add_to_maven_depmap macro is not being used
[x]: Packages DO NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on jpackage-
 utils for %update_maven_depmap macro
[x]: Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[x]: Packages use .mfiles file list instead of %{_datadir}/maven2/poms

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD 

[Bug 1355592] Review Request: libvmi - A library for performing virtual-machine introspection

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1355592



--- Comment #5 from W. Michael Petullo  ---
Update to newer Git version.

Spec URL: https://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/libvmi.spec
SRPM URL:
https://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/libvmi-0.11.0-1.20161003git5ad492c.fc24.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1366047] Review Request: tss2 - IBM's TSS 2.0

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366047

Tomas Mraz  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #37 from Tomas Mraz  ---
Please remove the %defattr(0644,root,root,-) in the -devel subpackage, this is
causing:

tss2-devel.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/tss2-devel 644

This can be corrected before the import.

Please also fill the ExcludeArch bugs as required by
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/Guidelines#Architecture_Build_Failures

Also note that we are moving to OpenSSL-1.1.0 in rawhide very soon, so please
work on making the tss2 compile against it.

rpmlint output:
rpmlint -v tss2*
tss2-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking
tss2-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking-url
http://sourceforge.net/projects/ibmtpm20tss/ (timeout 10 seconds)
tss2-devel.x86_64: I: checking
tss2-devel.x86_64: I: checking-url http://sourceforge.net/projects/ibmtpm20tss/
(timeout 10 seconds)
tss2-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
tss2-devel.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/tss2-devel 644
tss2.src: I: checking
tss2.src: I: checking-url http://sourceforge.net/projects/ibmtpm20tss/ (timeout
10 seconds)
tss2.src: I: checking-url
https://sourceforge.net/projects/ibmtpm20tss/files/NotForUsers_FedoraSourceRpm/ibmtss713withman.tar
(timeout 10 seconds)
tss2.x86_64: I: checking
tss2.x86_64: I: checking-url http://sourceforge.net/projects/ibmtpm20tss/
(timeout 10 seconds)
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings.

Package is ACCEPTED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1324020] Review Request: cassandra - OpenSource database Apache Cassandra

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324020



--- Comment #25 from gil cattaneo  ---
(In reply to Tomas Repik from comment #24)
> (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #23)
> > caffeine replace
> > com.googlecode.concurrentlinkedhashmap:concurrentlinkedhashmap-lru 
> > (see https://github.com/ben-manes/concurrentlinkedhashmap/issues/48),
> > you could try to remove it but could produce other issues.
> 
> All right I'll with with somebody to package caffeine and it's dependencies
> into  fedora.

i have begun this @ https://gil.fedorapeople.org/caffeine/
but there are some unavailable deps:
com.typesafe:config:1.3.0 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249965
com.squareup:javapoet:?
net.openhft:koloboke-api-jdk8,koloboke-impl-jdk8:0.6.7

Dependencies with issues:
com.github.brianfrankcooper.ycsb:core:0.10.0 (use apache
htrace-core4.1.0-incubating ; this package was retired)
com.typesafe.akka:akka-actor_2.10:2.3.15 (this package was retired)

Dependencies changes:
javax.cache:cache-api:1.0.0 (NON free, use
org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-jcache_1.0_spec)

> > Default Python interpreter for Fedora (in rawhide) should be python3
> > I do not understand ...
> 
> I didn't remember why we choose python2, but after some research I know now.
> Cassandra itself uses python 2.7 and its code (cqlshlib) is not python3
> compatible [1].

OK. Please, add a comment in the spec file

> > All test suite? or few tests?
> 
> Almost all of the tests.


> Also there has been a new release od cassandra 3.9 recently, I'll focus on
> that one.
> 
> [1] https://paste.fedoraproject.org/444041/69193147/raw/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1271193] Review Request: osgi-compendium - Interfaces and Classes for use in compiling OSGi bundles

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193

gil cattaneo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||182235 (FE-Legal)




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182235
[Bug 182235] Fedora Legal Tracker
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1271193] Review Request: osgi-compendium - Interfaces and Classes for use in compiling OSGi bundles

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193

gil cattaneo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||punto...@libero.it
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|punto...@libero.it
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1381892] Review Request: osgi-core - OSGi Core API

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381892

gil cattaneo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||punto...@libero.it
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|punto...@libero.it
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1381892] Review Request: osgi-core - OSGi Core API

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381892

gil cattaneo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||182235 (FE-Legal)




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182235
[Bug 182235] Fedora Legal Tracker
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1375735] Review Request: python-asciitree - Draws ASCII trees

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375735



--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-asciitree

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1378740] Review Request: python-pytest-faulthandler - py.test plugin that activates the fault handler module for tests

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378740



--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-pytest-faulthandler

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1381892] Review Request: osgi-core - OSGi Core API

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381892



--- Comment #2 from Michael Simacek  ---
Removed the alias, because it conflicts with felix and breaks stuff.

Spec URL: https://msimacek.fedorapeople.org/osgi-core.spec
SRPM URL: https://msimacek.fedorapeople.org/osgi-core-6.0.0-2.fc24.src.rpm

Scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15952809

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1381935] Review Request: python-distro - Linux Distribution - a Linux OS platform information API

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381935



--- Comment #3 from Neal Gompa  ---
Oh, also, your description in the python3 subpackage says it's the python 2
version, which it obviously is not.

You may choose to wrap the common description in a macro and reuse it for the
description sections, too.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1378028] Review Request: perl-MCE-Shared - MCE extension for sharing data, supporting threads and processes

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378028



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-MCE-Shared-1.805-3.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-be90ea5d91

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1381029] Review Request: more-itertools - Python library for efficient use of itertools utility in python

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381029



--- Comment #2 from Ranjan Maitra  ---
I am having a problem with the new SPEC file. It does not compile. Here is the
error I get. 

File "/usr/lib/python3.5/more.py", line 162
min_or_max = partial(max if reverse else min, key=lambda (a, b): a)
 ^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax

I have uploaded the new spec file here:

$ fpaste  more-itertools.spec 
Uploading (2.6KiB)...
http://paste.fedoraproject.org/444104/67316914/ ->
https://paste.fedoraproject.org/444104/67316914

Any suggestions would be appreciated.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1259486] Review Request: libglvnd - The GL Vendor-Neutral Dispatch library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259486



--- Comment #20 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart)  ---
Spec URL: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/libglvnd.spec
SRPM URL:
http://dl.kwizart.net/review/libglvnd-0.2.999-2.git14f6283.fc24.src.rpm


Changelog:
- Add Correct License: MIT

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1357064] Review Request: lumina-desktop - A lightweight, portable desktop environment

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357064
Bug 1357064 depends on bug 1381197, which changed state.

Bug 1381197 Summary: Please build a package for EPEL7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381197

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1259486] Review Request: libglvnd - The GL Vendor-Neutral Dispatch library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259486



--- Comment #19 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart)  ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #17)
> Can you reply the comment about license in comment #c11?

Thx for your reply.
I think I got your comment wrong and assumed AX_PTHREAD was something about
code, so I've assumed LGPLv2+ (should have been LGPLv3+).
Also the 3-clause BSD is related to build tool, so not to take into account.
Now, indeed, as build tools are not involved in license computation, the result
is that libglvnd is actually MIT (only).

Thx for your notice.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1259486] Review Request: libglvnd - The GL Vendor-Neutral Dispatch library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259486



--- Comment #18 from leigh scott  ---
Debian used BSD-3-clause license for libglvnd

https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-nvidia/libglvnd.git/tree/debian/copyright

To me the license looks like it should be MIT and BSD

https://paste.fedoraproject.org/444066/14756709/raw/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1324020] Review Request: cassandra - OpenSource database Apache Cassandra

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324020



--- Comment #24 from Tomas Repik  ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #23)
> caffeine replace
> com.googlecode.concurrentlinkedhashmap:concurrentlinkedhashmap-lru 
> (see https://github.com/ben-manes/concurrentlinkedhashmap/issues/48),
> you could try to remove it but could produce other issues.

All right I'll with with somebody to package caffeine and it's dependencies
into  fedora.

> Default Python interpreter for Fedora (in rawhide) should be python3
> I do not understand ...

I didn't remember why we choose python2, but after some research I know now.
Cassandra itself uses python 2.7 and its code (cqlshlib) is not python3
compatible [1].

> All test suite? or few tests?

Almost all of the tests.

> Please, cleanup spec file

DONE (will post new spec file with some other changes that might come)

Also there has been a new release od cassandra 3.9 recently, I'll focus on that
one.

[1] https://paste.fedoraproject.org/444041/69193147/raw/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1381935] Review Request: python-distro - Linux Distribution - a Linux OS platform information API

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381935



--- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa  ---
* Naming is correct.
* License is correct.
* Python 2 and Python 3 subpackages are being correctly generated for Fedora.

However, I see a few issues:
* Starting with Fedora 23, the default implementation of commands should be
Python 3 instead of Python 2. Please switch /usr/bin/distro to Python 3.
* You are hard-requiring /bin/lsb_release, which upstream says is not
necessary. Please downgrade it to Recommends, as the lsb package has a large
web of dependencies that people may not necessarily want.
* If you intend to package this for EPEL, you'll need to do a little bit more
work to support Python 3 in EPEL 6/7. For reference, here's a couple of
examples[1][2].


[1]: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/python-nose2/sources/spec/
[2]: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/python-pika/sources/spec/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1381935] Review Request: python-distro - Linux Distribution - a Linux OS platform information API

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381935

Neal Gompa  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ngomp...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



--- Comment #1 from Neal Gompa  ---
Taking this review.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1259486] Review Request: libglvnd - The GL Vendor-Neutral Dispatch library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259486

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|needinfo?(zbys...@in.waw.pl |
   |)   |



--- Comment #17 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek  ---
Can you reply the comment about license in comment #c11?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1381548] Review Request: mariadb-connector-odbc

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381548

Petr Menšík  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||pemen...@redhat.com



--- Comment #1 from Petr Menšík  ---
Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated


Issues:
===
- Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
  Note: Unversioned so-files directly in %_libdir.
  See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#DevelPackages
- If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
  in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
  for the package is included in %license.
  Note: License file COPYING is not marked as %license
  See:
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text


= MUST items =

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "BSD", "LGPL (v2.1 or later)", "Unknown or generated". 7 files
 have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/pemensik/fedora/rawhide/1381548-mariadb-connector-
 odbc/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
 Note: No known owner of /usr/share/doc/mariadb_connector_odbc
[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
 Note: Directories without known owners:
 /usr/share/doc/mariadb_connector_odbc
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
 Note: %defattr present but not needed
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[!]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
 Let RPM create path /usr/share/doc/mariadb_connector_odbc using %doc
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 30720 bytes in 2 files.
[!]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
 Use %license with relative path for COPYING
 %doc for README. Will not create hardcoded path in /usr/share/doc.
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must 

[Bug 1381935] New: Review Request: python-distro - Linux Distribution - a Linux OS platform information API

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381935

Bug ID: 1381935
   Summary: Review Request: python-distro - Linux Distribution - a
Linux OS platform information API
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: msu...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/python-distro/python-distro.spec
SRPM URL:
http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/python-distro/python-distro-1.0.0-2.fc24.src.rpm
Description: 
The distro (for: Linux Distribution) package provides information about the
Linux distribution it runs on, such as a reliable machine-readable ID, or
version information.

It is a renewed alternative implementation for Python's original
platform.linux_distribution function, but it also provides much more
functionality. An alternative implementation became necessary because
Python 3.5 deprecated this function, and Python 3.7 is expected to remove it
altogether. Its predecessor function platform.dist was already deprecated since
Python 2.6 and is also expected to be removed in Python 3.7. Still, there are
many cases in which access to that information is needed. See Python issue 1322
for more information.

Fedora Account System Username: msuchy

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1381661] Review Request: obs-build - A generic package build script

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381661



--- Comment #4 from Neal Gompa  ---
(In reply to Miroslav Suchý from comment #1)
> If you intend to package rest of OBS you may check chapter 5 from
> http://is.muni.cz/th/325243/fi_m/thesis.pdf

I do intend to try to package the rest of OBS, and I've seen Josef's thesis
before. I've addressed the Net::RabbitMQ issue before OBS 2.7 was released[1],
so that unblocks the OBS backend. I'm going to evaluate what the state of these
things are for API and frontend, soon.

[1]:
https://github.com/openSUSE/open-build-service/commit/3cde6d39ae388e75a24779461651709a069262a0

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1381661] Review Request: obs-build - A generic package build script

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381661



--- Comment #3 from Neal Gompa  ---
I got the license tags from the SUSE spec[1] and translated it to our short
tags. Since SUSE is the upstream and they have a spec, I trust that the tag
information is correct.

[1]:
https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file/openSUSE:Tools/build/build.spec?expand=1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1381548] Review Request: mariadb-connector-odbc

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381548

Petr Menšík  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1378028] Review Request: perl-MCE-Shared - MCE extension for sharing data, supporting threads and processes

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378028

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-MCE-Shared-1.805-3.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3411eea4a3

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1380420] Review Request: gomtree - Go CLI tool for mtree support

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380420

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
gomtree-0-0.2.git8c6b32c.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3f4edf70de

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 984700] Review Request: sddm - QML based X11 desktop manager

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984700



--- Comment #27 from Rex Dieter  ---
I would prefer the alias remain

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1144865] Review Request: glite-lb-doc - gLite Logging and Bookkeeping documentation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144865

František Dvořák  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
Last Closed||2016-10-05 06:52:57



--- Comment #27 from František Dvořák  ---
Active development ended and this component not strictly needed for
functionality. Closing.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1114215] Review Request: glite-lb-ws-test - Tests and usage examples of L Web Service interface

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114215

František Dvořák  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
Last Closed||2016-10-05 06:52:32



--- Comment #2 from František Dvořák  ---
Active development ended and this component not strictly needed for
functionality. Closing.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1271193] Review Request: osgi-compendium - Interfaces and Classes for use in compiling OSGi bundles

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193

Michael Simacek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||Reopened
 Status|CLOSED  |NEW
 Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
 Depends On||1381892
 Resolution|NOTABUG |---



--- Comment #11 from Michael Simacek  ---
Reopening.

Spec URL: https://msimacek.fedorapeople.org/osgi-compendium.spec
SRPM URL:
https://msimacek.fedorapeople.org/osgi-compendium-6.0.0-1.fc24.src.rpm


There have been some doubts about the licensing of the artifact, due to the
fact that in order to download it from upstream web page, it requires the user
to agree to a non-free OSGi specification license.

The following is a legal explanation of why this shouldn't be an obstacle for
including it in Fedora, kindly provided by Richard Fontana (via email):

The source files in the JAR, containing Apache License 2.0 notices,
are free software, and should be acceptable for packaging in Fedora
and RHEL.

There is definitely something confusing here: the spec license would
seem to apply to the JAR contents as well as the pdf containing the
specification.

However, the spec license has to be read in light of the fact that the
same group granting the spec license is also the group that has
explicitly placed those source files under the Apache License 2.0.

I read the spec license as applying in some sense to the specification
document but not applying to any source files licensed by the OSGi
Alliance under the Apache License. 

Specifically, the spec license says:

  You are not authorized to create any derivative work of the
  Specification. However, to the extent that an implementation of the
  Specification would necessarily be a derivative work of the
  Specification, OSGi also grants you a perpetual, non-exclusive,
  worldwide, fully paid-up, royalty free, limited license (without the
  right to sublicense) under any applicable copyrights, to create
  and/or distribute an implementation of the Specification that: (i)
  fully implements the Specification including all its required
  interfaces and functionality; (ii) does not modify, subset, superset
  or otherwise extend the OSGi Name Space, or include any public or
  protected packages, classes, Java interfaces, fields or methods
  within the OSGi Name Space other than those required and authorized
  by the Specification. An implementation that does not satisfy
  limitations (i)-(ii) is not considered an implementation of the
  Specification, does not receive the benefits of this license, and
  must not be described as an implementation of the Specification.

The Apache License on the other hand explicitly permits creation of
derivative works even if such derivative works fall outside the
conditions here. I.e., one could take the source files in the JAR and
use it to fork the OSGi standard, or to create a nonconformant
implementation of the OSGi standard.

Essentially, the Apache License 2.0 supersedes the spec license as far
as the source files in the JAR are concerned.


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183
[Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381892
[Bug 1381892] Review Request: osgi-core - OSGi Core API
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1381892] Review Request: osgi-core - OSGi Core API

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381892

Michael Simacek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1271193




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193
[Bug 1271193] Review Request: osgi-compendium - Interfaces and Classes for
use in compiling OSGi bundles
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org