[Bug 1457949] Review Request: libdxflib - A C++ library for reading and writing DXF files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System--- libdxflib-3.17.0-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1350884] Review Request: mspgcc - Rebase of GCC for the MSP430 to TI / Red Hat upstream
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350884 --- Comment #13 from Elliott Sales de Andrade--- For g++ subpackage, I'd check original gcc, maybe. Same for gnulib, assuming it has also been bundling it. The illegal package name has to do with including static files in a package name without -static suffix, which is likely not relevant here. I'd say pinging someone from the Embedded SIG might be useful: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Embedded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1469396] Review Request: hotspot - The Linux perf GUI for performance analysis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469396 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System--- hotspot-1.0.0-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-ef275a5084 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1470580] Review Request: rubygem-factory_girl - Framework and DSL for defining and using model instance factories
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470580 Pavel Valenachanged: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Pavel Valena --- Package Review == - Will you be unretiring the package in two commits? The first one being spec file checkout to 533041868174e19827d4a7374333f20e4b0f377d. - Is there any reason for inclusion of `cucumber.yml`? - I'd recommend you to use %{gem_name} in `%exclude %{gem_instdir}/factory_girl.gemspec` Apart from my questions/recommendations above the package is fine, therefore I APPROVE this package. Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated = MUST items = [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local = SHOULD items = Generic: [x]: Avoid bundling fonts in non-fonts packages. [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]:
[Bug 1433757] Review Request: python-glyphsLib - A bridge from Glyphs source files to UFOs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433757 --- Comment #6 from Elliott Sales de Andrade--- A non-random URL can be done like: https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/source/g/%{srcname}/%{srcname}-%{version}.tar.gz -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1469396] Review Request: hotspot - The Linux perf GUI for performance analysis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469396 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- hotspot-1.0.0-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-6588dc96d6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1465881] Review Request: golang-github-cznic-lexer - Run time generator of action less scanners written in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1465881 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla--- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/golang-github-cznic-lexer -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1465881] Review Request: golang-github-cznic-lexer - Run time generator of action less scanners written in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1465881 --- Comment #2 from Fabio Valentini--- Thanks for the review! I'll look at (re)moving the test_deps.go file before building the package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1457949] Review Request: libdxflib - A C++ library for reading and writing DXF files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System--- libdxflib-3.17.0-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1470842] New: Review Request: bazel - A fast, scalable, multi-language and extensible build system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470842 Bug ID: 1470842 Summary: Review Request: bazel - A fast, scalable, multi-language and extensible build system Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: sjenn...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://www.variantweb.net/pub/bazel.spec SRPM URL: https://www.variantweb.net/pub/bazel-0.5.2-1.fc26.src.rpm Description: Bazel is a build tool which coordinates builds and runs tests. The extension language allows it to work with source files written in any language, with native support for Java, C, C++ and Python. Bazel produces builds and runs tests for multiple platforms. Fedora Account System Username: sjenning Notably, this is the build tool for Kubernetes and will soon be required for developers on that project. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1467322] Review Request: manifest-tool - A command line tool used for creating manifest list objects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1467322 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System--- manifest-tool-0.6.0-4.gita28af2b.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-bef4cbcf4b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1467322] Review Request: manifest-tool - A command line tool used for creating manifest list objects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1467322 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1467322] Review Request: manifest-tool - A command line tool used for creating manifest list objects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1467322 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System--- manifest-tool-0.6.0-3.gita28af2b.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-b093304055 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1293694] Review Request: byte-buddy - Runtime code generation for the Java virtual machine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293694 Raphael Gronerchanged: What|Removed |Added CC||punto...@libero.it Flags||needinfo?(puntogil@libero.i ||t) --- Comment #8 from Raphael Groner --- awaitility (and so byte-buddy as dependency) is needed for some tests of rabbitmq-java-client version 4.1.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1419317] Review Request: deepin-terminal - terminal emulation application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419317 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmekchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zbys...@in.waw.pl --- Comment #1 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- The usual: - please link to the raw spec file for fedora-review's sake - underscores on macros are not necessary It would be great to add an appdata file [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:AppData]. This will make it easier to discover and install deepin-terminal for users of other desktop environments. I'm assuming it's independently usable. It doesn't build in rawhide and F26 currently: /builddir/build/BUILD/deepin-terminal-4f7069e064ae4e5437013295fd5bdbfd8867086c/./lib/animation.vala:33.9-33.43: warning: the modifier `static' is not applicable to constants public static const int FAST = 250; /* Good for animations that convey duplicated information */ ^^^ /builddir/build/BUILD/deepin-terminal-4f7069e064ae4e5437013295fd5bdbfd8867086c/./lib/animation.vala:34.9-34.46: warning: the modifier `static' is not applicable to constants public static const int INSTANT = 150; /* Good for animations that don't convey any information */ ^^ /builddir/build/BUILD/deepin-terminal-4f7069e064ae4e5437013295fd5bdbfd8867086c/./lib/animation.vala:35.9-35.45: warning: the modifier `static' is not applicable to constants public static const int NORMAL = 500; ^ /builddir/build/BUILD/deepin-terminal-4f7069e064ae4e5437013295fd5bdbfd8867086c/./lib/animation.vala:36.9-36.44: warning: the modifier `static' is not applicable to constants public static const int SLOW = 1000; /* Good for animations that convey information that is only presented in the animation */ gee-0.8.vapi:278.3-278.31: error: overriding method `Gee.HashSet.foreach' is incompatible with base method `Gee.AbstractCollection.foreach': incompatible type of parameter 1. public override bool @foreach (Gee.ForallFunc f); ^ gee-0.8.vapi:278.3-278.31: error: Gee.HashSet.foreach: no suitable method found to override public override bool @foreach (Gee.ForallFunc f); ^ gee-0.8.vapi:368.3-368.31: error: overriding method `Gee.PriorityQueue.foreach' is incompatible with base method `Gee.AbstractCollection.foreach': incompatible type of parameter 1. public override bool @foreach (Gee.ForallFunc f); ^ gee-0.8.vapi:368.3-368.31: error: Gee.PriorityQueue.foreach: no suitable method found to override public override bool @foreach (Gee.ForallFunc f); /builddir/build/BUILD/deepin-terminal-4f7069e064ae4e5437013295fd5bdbfd8867086c/./widget/quake_window.vala:43.27-43.54: warning: Gdk.Screen.get_monitor_at_window has been deprecated since 3.22 /builddir/build/BUILD/deepin-terminal-4f7069e064ae4e5437013295fd5bdbfd8867086c/./widget/quake_window.vala:43.56-43.79: warning: Gdk.Screen.get_active_window has been deprecated since 3.22 /builddir/build/BUILD/deepin-terminal-4f7069e064ae4e5437013295fd5bdbfd8867086c/./widget/quake_window.vala:45.13-45.39: warning: Gdk.Screen.get_monitor_geometry has been deprecated since 3.22 /builddir/build/BUILD/deepin-terminal-4f7069e064ae4e5437013295fd5bdbfd8867086c/./widget/quake_window.vala:293.27-293.54: warning: Gdk.Screen.get_monitor_at_window has been deprecated since 3.22 /builddir/build/BUILD/deepin-terminal-4f7069e064ae4e5437013295fd5bdbfd8867086c/./widget/quake_window.vala:293.56-293.79: warning: Gdk.Screen.get_active_window has been deprecated since 3.22 /builddir/build/BUILD/deepin-terminal-4f7069e064ae4e5437013295fd5bdbfd8867086c/./widget/quake_window.vala:295.13-295.39: warning: Gdk.Screen.get_monitor_geometry has been deprecated since 3.22 /builddir/build/BUILD/deepin-terminal-4f7069e064ae4e5437013295fd5bdbfd8867086c/./widget/quake_window.vala:177.34-177.61: warning: Gdk.Screen.get_monitor_at_window has been deprecated since 3.22 /builddir/build/BUILD/deepin-terminal-4f7069e064ae4e5437013295fd5bdbfd8867086c/./widget/quake_window.vala:177.63-177.86: warning: Gdk.Screen.get_active_window has been deprecated since 3.22 /builddir/build/BUILD/deepin-terminal-4f7069e064ae4e5437013295fd5bdbfd8867086c/./widget/quake_window.vala:178.34-178.61: warning: Gdk.Screen.get_monitor_at_window has been deprecated since 3.22 /builddir/build/BUILD/deepin-terminal-4f7069e064ae4e5437013295fd5bdbfd8867086c/./widget/quake_window.vala:181.13-181.39: warning:
[Bug 1470702] Review Request: rubygem-jekyll-sitemap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470702 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmekchanged: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1470699 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470699 [Bug 1470699] New version of rubygem-jekyll is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1341662] Review Request: fedora-developer-portal - Offline Fedora Developer Portal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341662 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmekchanged: What|Removed |Added Depends On|1470699 | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470699 [Bug 1470699] New version of rubygem-jekyll is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1470702] Review Request: rubygem-jekyll-sitemap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470702 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmekchanged: What|Removed |Added CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl --- Comment #1 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- Looks reasonable. Everything in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby seems to be followed, but I know zilch about ruby, so it'd be better if somebody else reviewed this package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1468830] Review Request: abbayedesmorts-gpl - Platform game set in 13th century
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468830 --- Comment #6 from Andrea Musuruane--- Spec URL: https://musuruan.fedorapeople.org/abbayedesmorts-gpl.spec SRPM URL: https://musuruan.fedorapeople.org/abbayedesmorts-gpl-2.0.1-2.20170709git.fc25.src.rpm Changelog: - Updated to new upstream post-release - Added missing BR -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1468861] Review Request: dtksettings - DtkSettings is a powerful tool to generate config from json
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468861 --- Comment #12 from Gwyn Ciesla--- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/dtksettings -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1341662] Review Request: fedora-developer-portal - Offline Fedora Developer Portal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341662 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmekchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zbys...@in.waw.pl Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #12 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- URL: should give the full URL to the upstream tarball, so it's possible to build the whole file from the spec file, and to verify that the tarball you have matches the upstream tarball. The build part (everything starting from "jekyll build") should be in the %build section. The kill part is indeed tough. My idea of putting 'jekyll serve' in the background does not work because it takes a while for jekyll to open the listening port, and we have to wait for that, but there's not synchronization mechanism. So using '--detach' seems like the only option. I'd do this: diff --git fedora-developer-portal.spec fedora-developer-portal.spec index a711e0b05b..6ea026e24b 100644 --- fedora-developer-portal.spec +++ fedora-developer-portal.spec @@ -49,6 +49,8 @@ touch _includes/announcement.html gem install jekyll-lunr-js-search gem install jekyll-sitemap +%build + # Build the site and start server jekyll build jekyll serve --detach @@ -60,9 +62,7 @@ wget --convert-links -r http://127.0.0.1:4000/ || : mv 127.0.0.1\:4000/ fedora-developer-portal-content-%{shortcommit} # Kill server in the background -kill -9 `ps aux | grep jekyll | awk '{print $2}'` || : - -%build +pgrep -f 'jekyll serve --detach' | xargs kill %install mkdir -p %buildroot%{_bindir} - OK, let's concentrate on the deps. This package looks good. I'll add fedora-review+ when the deps are ready. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1468861] Review Request: dtksettings - DtkSettings is a powerful tool to generate config from json
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468861 --- Comment #11 from Felix Yan--- Requested, status is now "Awaiting Review". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1468861] Review Request: dtksettings - DtkSettings is a powerful tool to generate config from json
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468861 --- Comment #10 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek--- Now you need to request a new package in the pkgdb: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/request/package/. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageDB_admin_requests has some additional docs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1468861] Review Request: dtksettings - DtkSettings is a powerful tool to generate config from json
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468861 --- Comment #9 from Felix Yan--- Sorry I overlooked the description-line-too-long error. Updated again: Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/felixonmars/fedora-staging/37efb2c44daec4badb0442422c184a2eec9c46e1/dtksettings/dtksettings.spec SRPM URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/felixonmars/fedora-staging/37efb2c44daec4badb0442422c184a2eec9c46e1/dtksettings/dtksettings-0.1.7-1.git34d321e.fc26.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1468861] Review Request: dtksettings - DtkSettings is a powerful tool to generate config from json
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468861 --- Comment #8 from Felix Yan--- Thank you. I have also adjusted the Summary field a bit. Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/felixonmars/fedora-staging/0231c295d5cea631a304f6e3c3ca356a6bb9282b/dtksettings/dtksettings.spec SRPM URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/felixonmars/fedora-staging/0231c295d5cea631a304f6e3c3ca356a6bb9282b/dtksettings/dtksettings-0.1.7-1.git34d321e.fc26.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1268360] Review Request: rubygem-simple_oauth - Simply builds and verifies OAuth headers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268360 --- Comment #17 from Pavel Valena--- These following issues are still valid. > Issues > - README.md and CONTRIBUTING.md should be in `doc` subpackage. > - Release should be 1 (also remove changelog entries) > - Move all `%exclude` macros to main package > - Include Gemfile and Rakefile in `doc` subpackage > - Add `ruby` BuildRequire to ensure MRI is used for tests. > - Use Fedora 27 dist tag to create srpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1268360] Review Request: rubygem-simple_oauth - Simply builds and verifies OAuth headers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268360 --- Comment #16 from Pavel Valena--- (In reply to Ilya Gradina from comment #14) > Thx, for review. > > I have a few questions. > > 1. "Use Fedora 27 dist tag to create srpm" > - Why can not I use 26? Fedora 27 is current rawhide version. Previously 26 was correct, but now it's currently release so it's eligible for updates only AFAIK. > > 2. "Add `ruby` BuildRequire to ensure MRI is used for tests." > - What did you mean? "BuildRequires: ruby(release)" - already available. This could in some case pull 'jruby' instead of 'ruby' dependency, as both satisfy this require. ``` $ dnf repoquery -q --disablerepo='*' --qf "%{name}" --enablerepo='rawhide' --whatprovides 'ruby(release)' jruby ruby-libs ``` > > 3. "Move all `%exclude` macros to main package" > - you meant all `%exclude` macros move to section %files Yes, that's correct. %files section without arg creates main package and '%files doc' creates the doc subpackage for this package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1421041] Review Request: deepin-gettext-tools - Deepin Gettext Tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421041 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmekchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zbys...@in.waw.pl -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1189171] Review Request: antlr-python - Python runtime support for ANTLR-generated parsers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189171 Germano Massullochanged: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(germano.massullo@ ||gmail.com) --- Comment #15 from Germano Massullo --- (In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment #14) > Thanks for the comments, Miro. I'll address them soon. > > (In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #13) > > (In reply to Germano Massullo from comment #11) > > > And another thing. Please remove the big comment block at the beginning of > > > spec file, because LICENSE file is the proper place to insert licensing > > > stuff > > > > I would think of that comment block as a license for the specfile itself, > > not the package content. This is not forbidden in Fedora. > > That's correct. Also, I wanted to minimize divergence from RHEL spec. Okay -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1468861] Review Request: dtksettings - DtkSettings is a powerful tool to generate config from json
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468861 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmekchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST --- Comment #7 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- %description This package provides a Dtk module which can generate user configuration and UI dialog from json. ("generate config" is unclear) %description devel → add "." at the end. All %description:s should have a dot (but Summary:ies not). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1441023] Review Request: python-fontmake - Compile fonts from sources to binary
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441023 --- Comment #1 from Athos Ribeiro--- New sources Spec URL: https://athoscr.fedorapeople.org/packaging/python-fontmake.spec SRPM URL: https://athoscr.fedorapeople.org/packaging/python-fontmake-1.2.6-1.fc25.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1433757] Review Request: python-glyphsLib - A bridge from Glyphs source files to UFOs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433757 --- Comment #5 from Athos Ribeiro--- Thank you Elliot and Fabio :) - I believe that when pypi started providing random URLs only, python packagers started preferring to fetch sources from github. Since this new pypi.org seems to be a 'pre-production' instance, I would rather fetch sources from github, since there are tags in upstream repositories. I will switch to pypi if needed, though :) - Project name changed. I do prefer to use them just like upstream, but some reviewers do complain about cammelcases :( - Package updated! Spec URL: https://athoscr.fedorapeople.org/packaging/python-glyphsLib.spec SRPM URL: https://athoscr.fedorapeople.org/packaging/python-glyphsLib-1.7.5-1.fc25.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1432983] Review Request: camotics - Open-Source Simulation & Computer Aided Machining - A 3-axis CNC GCode simulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432983 Bug 1432983 depends on bug 1457949, which changed state. Bug 1457949 Summary: Review Request: libdxflib - A C++ library for reading and writing DXF files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1457949] Review Request: libdxflib - A C++ library for reading and writing DXF files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2017-07-13 10:50:59 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- libdxflib-3.17.0-2.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1463092] Review Request: python-vulture - Find Dead Code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1463092 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2017-07-13 10:50:56 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- python-vulture-0.14-3.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1433757] Review Request: python-glyphsLib - A bridge from Glyphs source files to UFOs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433757 Athos Ribeirochanged: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |python-glyphslib - A bridge |python-glyphsLib - A bridge |from Glyphs source files to |from Glyphs source files to |UFOs|UFOs -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1458840] Review Request: urw-base35-fonts - Level 2 Core Font Set for Ghostscript
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458840 David Kaspar [Dee'Kej]changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1470700 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470700 [Bug 1470700] ps2pdf crashes on s309x only: Error: /invalidfont in /findfont -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1470580] Review Request: rubygem-factory_girl - Framework and DSL for defining and using model instance factories
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470580 Pavel Valenachanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||pval...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|pval...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1465881] Review Request: golang-github-cznic-lexer - Run time generator of action less scanners written in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1465881 Athos Ribeirochanged: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Athos Ribeiro --- Hi Fabio, I am taking this one. - It seems that the file test_deps.go should not be in the -devel package. It probably should not be shipped at all, but if it is to be shipped, I believe it should go in the unit tests sub-package. Other than that, the package looks great. I will not block this review, since that is basically a blank file anyway. Approved. Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated = MUST items = Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local = SHOULD items = Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags
[Bug 1465881] Review Request: golang-github-cznic-lexer - Run time generator of action less scanners written in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1465881 Athos Ribeirochanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||athoscribe...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|athoscribe...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1470678] Review Request: perl-Data-Dmp - Dump Perl data structures as Perl code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470678 Jitka Plesnikovachanged: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1470705 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470705 [Bug 1470705] Review Request: perl-Log-ger - Lightweight, flexible logging framework -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1470705] Review Request: perl-Log-ger - Lightweight, flexible logging framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470705 Jitka Plesnikovachanged: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1469515 Depends On||1470678 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469515 [Bug 1469515] perl-Perl-Stripper-0.10 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470678 [Bug 1470678] Review Request: perl-Data-Dmp - Dump Perl data structures as Perl code -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1470705] New: Review Request: perl-Log-ger - Lightweight, flexible logging framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470705 Bug ID: 1470705 Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-ger - Lightweight, flexible logging framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jples...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://jplesnik.fedorapeople.org/perl-Log-ger/perl-Log-ger.spec SRPM URL: https://jplesnik.fedorapeople.org/perl-Log-ger/perl-Log-ger-0.015-1.fc27.src.rpm Description: This module provides another lightweight, flexible logging framework. Fedora Account System Username: jples...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1470702] Review Request: rubygem-jekyll-sitemap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470702 František Zatloukalchanged: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1341662 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341662 [Bug 1341662] Review Request: fedora-developer-portal - Offline Fedora Developer Portal -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1470702] New: Review Request: rubygem-jekyll-sitemap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470702 Bug ID: 1470702 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-jekyll-sitemap Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: fzatl...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org SPEC: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/frantisekz/fedora-developer-portal/fedora-26-x86_64/00578946-rubygem-jekyll-sitemap/rubygem-jekyll-sitemap.spec SRPM: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/frantisekz/fedora-developer-portal/fedora-26-x86_64/00578946-rubygem-jekyll-sitemap/rubygem-jekyll-sitemap-1.1.1-1.fc26.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1341662] Review Request: fedora-developer-portal - Offline Fedora Developer Portal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341662 František Zatloukalchanged: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1470699, 1470702 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470699 [Bug 1470699] New version of rubygem-jekyll is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470702 [Bug 1470702] Review Request: rubygem-jekyll-sitemap -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1465889] Tracking: Deepin Desktop related package review tracker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1465889 Bug 1465889 depends on bug 1469951, which changed state. Bug 1469951 Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-LibXML-PrettyPrint - Add pleasant white space to an XML tree https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469951 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1469951] Review Request: perl-XML-LibXML-PrettyPrint - Add pleasant white space to an XML tree
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469951 Petr Pisarchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-XML-LibXML-PrettyPrint ||-0.006-1.fc27 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2017-07-13 09:02:20 --- Comment #5 from Petr Pisar --- Thank you for the review and the repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1470656] Review Request: perl-Regexp-Stringify - Stringify a Regexp object
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470656 Jitka Plesnikovachanged: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1470678 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470678 [Bug 1470678] Review Request: perl-Data-Dmp - Dump Perl data structures as Perl code -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1470678] Review Request: perl-Data-Dmp - Dump Perl data structures as Perl code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470678 Jitka Plesnikovachanged: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1470656 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470656 [Bug 1470656] Review Request: perl-Regexp-Stringify - Stringify a Regexp object -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1470678] New: Review Request: perl-Data-Dmp - Dump Perl data structures as Perl code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470678 Bug ID: 1470678 Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Dmp - Dump Perl data structures as Perl code Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jples...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://jplesnik.fedorapeople.org/perl-Data-Dmp/perl-Data-Dmp.spec SRPM URL: https://jplesnik.fedorapeople.org/perl-Data-Dmp/perl-Data-Dmp-0.23-1.fc27.src.rpm Description: This module is a Perl dumper like Data::Dumper. It's compact , starts fast and does not use any non-core modules except Regexp::Stringify when dumping regexes. It produces compact single-line output (similar to Data::Dumper::Concise). It supports dumping objects, regexes, circular structures, coderefs. Fedora Account System Username: jples...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1421413] Review Request: sysusage - System monitoring based on perl, rrdtool, and sysstat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421413 --- Comment #9 from Frank Crawford--- (In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #8) > (In reply to Frank Crawford from comment #6) > > Will review and fix up. > > > Great, please also address comment 3 and comment 5. Thanks Jaroslav, I'll also pick up those comments while I'm at it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1421413] Review Request: sysusage - System monitoring based on perl, rrdtool, and sysstat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421413 --- Comment #8 from Jaroslav Škarvada--- (In reply to Frank Crawford from comment #6) > Will review and fix up. > Great, please also address comment 3 and comment 5. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1421413] Review Request: sysusage - System monitoring based on perl, rrdtool, and sysstat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421413 --- Comment #7 from Jaroslav Škarvada--- (In reply to Marek Cermak from comment #1) > [!]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. > Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in > sysusage-common , sysusage-httpd , sysusage-rsysusage False positive, noarch packages, no %{?_isa} is needed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1421413] Review Request: sysusage - System monitoring based on perl, rrdtool, and sysstat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421413 --- Comment #6 from Frank Crawford--- (In reply to Marek Cermak from comment #1) Marek, thanks for that. I've made a couple of comments below. > Package Review > == ... > > NOTES > - > - Orphaned package - name conflict permitted Obviously not an issue, it is the same package, so should be the same. > - For package ownership information, see : > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging: > Guidelines#The_directory_is_owned_by_a_package_which_is_not_required_for_your > _package_to_function or > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:WeakDependencies Mostly covered above, the only outstanding seems to be for /etc/cron.d, which I thought would be covered by crontabs, but seems to be owned by cronie. Any suggestions on what to do about that one, if anything? > - Correction of the spelling in specfile Yeah, will fix real errors here. (rsysusage -> sausage! :-)) > - Consider using %{?_isa} to fully define Requires Will review and probably fix it up. > - Consider putting content of Web App into /usr/share/%{name} instead of > /var/www/ See Comment 2 above. > - Change %doc LICENSE -> %license LICENSE Yep, will fix. > - Not necessary anymore to compare %if 0%{?fedora} > 17 Yep, will look at and probably remove. > - Rpmlint is complaining about the #%global comment - note that to > escape > the whole macro, #%% is needed, also, it could actually be deleted > completely. Will review and fix up. As I said, thanks, I'll review and submit a new spec file. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1421413] Review Request: sysusage - System monitoring based on perl, rrdtool, and sysstat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421413 --- Comment #5 from Jaroslav Škarvada--- Also please remove trailing whitespaces in %description. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1421413] Review Request: sysusage - System monitoring based on perl, rrdtool, and sysstat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421413 --- Comment #4 from Jaroslav Škarvada--- (In reply to Marek Cermak from comment #1) > file /etc/cron.d is not owned by any package False positive, the package requires crontabs which requires /etc/cron.d, which is provided by cronie, i.e. the dependency is fulfilled. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1421413] Review Request: sysusage - System monitoring based on perl, rrdtool, and sysstat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421413 --- Comment #3 from Jaroslav Škarvada--- Also I think the license tag should be GPLv3+, not GPLv3. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1467322] Review Request: manifest-tool - A command line tool used for creating manifest list objects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1467322 --- Comment #13 from Gwyn Ciesla--- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/manifest-tool -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1469951] Review Request: perl-XML-LibXML-PrettyPrint - Add pleasant white space to an XML tree
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469951 --- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla--- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-XML-LibXML-PrettyPrint -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1470656] New: Review Request: perl-Regexp-Stringify - Stringify a Regexp object
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470656 Bug ID: 1470656 Summary: Review Request: perl-Regexp-Stringify - Stringify a Regexp object Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jples...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://jplesnik.fedorapeople.org/perl-Regexp-Stringify/perl-Regexp-Stringify.spec SRPM URL: https://jplesnik.fedorapeople.org/perl-Regexp-Stringify/perl-Regexp-Stringify-0.06-1.fc27.src.rpm Description: This module is an alternative to Perl's default stringification of Regexp object and has some features/options, e.g. producing regexp string that is compatible with certain perl versions. Fedora Account System Username: jples...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1421413] Review Request: sysusage - System monitoring based on perl, rrdtool, and sysstat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421413 Jaroslav Škarvadachanged: What|Removed |Added CC||jskar...@redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Jaroslav Škarvada --- (In reply to Marek Cermak from comment #1) > - Consider putting content of Web App into /usr/share/%{name} instead of > /var/www/ > Probably OK, bug 1028722. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1470644] Review Request: rubygem-addressable
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470644 Bug 1470644 depends on bug 1470641, which changed state. Bug 1470641 Summary: rubygem-public_suffix is built only in Rawhide https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470641 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1470448] Review Request: php-simplesamlphp-saml2_3 - SAML2 PHP library from SimpleSAMLphp ( version 3)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470448 Remi Colletchanged: What|Removed |Added CC||fed...@famillecollet.com --- Comment #1 from Remi Collet --- fedora-review detects a corrupted archive. You need to pull a git snapshot to workaround the .gitattributes -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1421413] Review Request: sysusage - System monitoring based on perl, rrdtool, and sysstat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421413 Marek Cermakchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Marek Cermak --- Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: === - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. Note: License file LICENSE is not marked as %license See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text - Package does not use a name that already exists. Note: A package with this name already exists. Please check https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/sysusage See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Conflicting_Package_Names - Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl, /usr/share/perl5, /etc/cron.d, /var/www /usr/share/perl5 is owned by perl-libs-5.26.0-394.fc27.x86_64 /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/ is owned by perl-libs-5.26.0-394.fc27.x86_64 /var/www is owned by httpd-filesystem-2.4.27-1.fc27.noarch file /etc/cron.d is not owned by any package - %build : Remove the DESTDIR=%{buildroot} from the build section, if not possible, check that nothing is being built into the directory during build section. - See "NOTES" at the end of this document for more info and todos. = MUST items = Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "GPL (v3 or later)", "Unknown or generated". 28 files have unknown license. [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [!]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl, /usr/share/perl5, /etc/cron.d, /var/www [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 153600 bytes in 5 files. [!]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: No %config files under /usr. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Perl: [x]:
[Bug 1470644] Review Request: rubygem-addressable
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470644 František Zatloukalchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed||2017-07-13 07:35:56 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1470644] Review Request: rubygem-addressable
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470644 František Zatloukalchanged: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1470641 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470641 [Bug 1470641] rubygem-public_suffix is built only in Rawhide -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1470644] New: Review Request: rubygem-addressable
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470644 Bug ID: 1470644 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-addressable Product: Fedora Version: 26 Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: fzatl...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org SPEC URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/frantisekz/fedora-developer-portal/fedora-26-x86_64/00578912-rubygem-addressable/rubygem-addressable.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/frantisekz/fedora-developer-portal/fedora-26-x86_64/00578912-rubygem-addressable/rubygem-addressable-2.5.1-1.fc26.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1341662] Review Request: fedora-developer-portal - Offline Fedora Developer Portal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341662 --- Comment #11 from František Zatloukal--- So, I've looked at packaging jekyll-sitemap with gem2rpm. It looks like there is some automatic requires detection because it's depending on rubygem-jekyll >= 3.3 (newer than packaged in Fedora). I was able to solve dependency chain on my system and it's pretty complicated: fedora-developer-portal depends on rubygem-jekyll-sitemap rubygem-jekyll-sitemap depends on rubygem-jekyll >= 3.3 rubygem-jekyll >= 3.3 depends on rubygem-addressable rubygem-addressable depends on rubygem-public_suffix (built in rawhide only, but installable in f26) I will create review request for rubygem-addressable soon, rubygem-jekyll bug regarding new version availability and rubygem-public_suffix bug report to package it even for F26 at least. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1470635] New: Review Request: glslang - OpenGL and OpenGL ES shader front end and validator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470635 Bug ID: 1470635 Summary: Review Request: glslang - OpenGL and OpenGL ES shader front end and validator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: leigh123li...@googlemail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/review/glslang/1/glslang.spec SRPM URL: https://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/review/glslang/1/glslang-3.1-0.1.20170612.git91c46c6.fc26.src.rpm Description: glslang is the official reference compiler front end for the OpenGL ES and OpenGL shading languages. It implements a strict interpretation of the specifications for these languages. Fedora Account System Username: leigh123linux -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1470447] Review Request: php-robrichards-xmlseclibs3 - A PHP library for XML Security (version 3)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470447 Remi Colletchanged: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Remi Collet --- [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines === APPROVED === -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1470447] Review Request: php-robrichards-xmlseclibs3 - A PHP library for XML Security (version 3)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470447 --- Comment #4 from Remi Collet--- Created attachment 1297505 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1297505=edit review.txt Generated by fedora-review 0.6.1 (f03e4e7) last change: 2016-05-02 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1470447 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, PHP, Shell-api -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1470447] Review Request: php-robrichards-xmlseclibs3 - A PHP library for XML Security (version 3)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470447 Remi Colletchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|fed...@famillecollet.com --- Comment #3 from Remi Collet --- Created attachment 1297504 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1297504=edit review.txt phpCompatInfo version 5.0.7 DB version 1.22.0 built Jun 10 2017 10:52:56 CEST static analyze results -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1470447] Review Request: php-robrichards-xmlseclibs3 - A PHP library for XML Security (version 3)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470447 --- Comment #2 from Remi Collet--- Forget previous stupid comment... badly read the diff with v2 spec file... I need Holidays ;) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1470447] Review Request: php-robrichards-xmlseclibs3 - A PHP library for XML Security (version 3)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470447 Remi Colletchanged: What|Removed |Added CC||fed...@famillecollet.com --- Comment #1 from Remi Collet --- From CHANGELOG: 25, May 2017, 3.0.0 Improvements: - Remove use of mcrypt So, please cleanup weak dep + comments about mcrypt -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1470580] Review Request: rubygem-factory_girl - Framework and DSL for defining and using model instance factories
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470580 Vít Ondruchchanged: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1380037 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380037 [Bug 1380037] rubygem-cucumber-rails-1.5.0 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1470580] New: Review Request: rubygem-factory_girl - Framework and DSL for defining and using model instance factories
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470580 Bug ID: 1470580 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-factory_girl - Framework and DSL for defining and using model instance factories Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: vondr...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org This is re-review request to unretire rubygem-factory_girl. I need it to execute test suite of rubygem-cucumber-rails. Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/cgit/vondruch/public_git/rubygem-factory_girl.git/plain/rubygem-factory_girl.spec?id=039fe34538785102ea0ca5a87bfe5bb30e051844 SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/vondruch/rubygem-factory_girl-4.8.0-1.fc27.src.rpm Description: Framework and DSL for defining and using factories - less error-prone, more explicit, and all-around easier to work with than fixtures. Fedora Account System Username: vondruch Koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=20491971 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1469396] Review Request: hotspot - The Linux perf GUI for performance analysis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469396 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System--- hotspot-1.0.0-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-6588dc96d6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1469396] Review Request: hotspot - The Linux perf GUI for performance analysis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469396 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1469396] Review Request: hotspot - The Linux perf GUI for performance analysis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469396 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System--- hotspot-1.0.0-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-ef275a5084 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org