[Bug 1749755] Review Request: rubygem-kramdown-syntax-coderay - Coderay syntax highlighting for kramdown
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1749755 Mamoru TASAKA changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mtas...@fedoraproject.org Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1749751] Review Request: rubygem-kramdown-parser-gfm - Kramdown parser for GitHub-flavored markdown
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1749751 Mamoru TASAKA changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Mamoru TASAKA --- This package (rubygem-kramdown-parser-gfm) is APPROVED by mtasaka -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1749751] Review Request: rubygem-kramdown-parser-gfm - Kramdown parser for GitHub-flavored markdown
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1749751 --- Comment #1 from Mamoru TASAKA --- 1. Review * license okay - MIT for all files * spec file * mock build okay https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=37637054 * rpmlint okay for src.rpm, binary rpm, installed rpm * installable for F-32 * basic functionality okay (as documentated on "Usage" of https://github.com/kramdown/parser-gfm) ``` [mockbuild@1a996dddfd3e4efb85d341420b9e76a2 ~]$ ruby -e 'require "kramdown" ; require "kramdown-parser-gfm" ; text="This ~~is a complex strike through *test ~~with nesting~~ involved* here~~." ; puts Kramdown::Document.new(text, input: "GFM").to_html' This is a complex strike through *test ~~with nesting involved* here~~. ``` 2. Advice * BR - I would recommend to write "BuildRequires: rubygem(kramdown) >= 2.0" because on F-31 and below rubygem-kramdown is still 1.7.x and this srpm is incompatible on those branches (not a blocker for review) By the way do you plan to import this also on F-31? If so I will coordinate it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1750499] Review Request: ladspa-swh-plugins - A set of audio plugins for LADSPA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750499 Orcan Ogetbil changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oget.fed...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Orcan Ogetbil --- Thank you so much Guido for bringing this back up! Could you re-add the previous %changelog so we don't lose history? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1751535] Review Request: python-fsspec - File-system specification
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751535 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2019-a343d3ae1e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-a343d3ae1e -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1750983] Review Request: oomd - Userspace Out-Of-Memory (OOM) killer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750983 Filipe Brandenburger changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2019-09-12 21:57:26 --- Comment #7 from Filipe Brandenburger --- Packages built! rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1376965 f31: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1376974 f30: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1376978 Should I add it to "updates" for f31 and f30? Should I add it to comps.xml? (Steps 13 and 14 from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/New_package_process_for_existing_contributors) Thanks! Filipe -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1726400] Review Request: python-text-unidecode - A Python module for handling non-Roman text data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1726400 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2019-09-12 21:08:41 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- python-text-unidecode-1.3-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1722656] Review Request: python-sybil - Automated testing for the examples in your documentation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722656 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- python-sybil-1.2.0-2.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-dce13e06da -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1711611] Review Request: pdfarranger - PDF file merging, rearranging, and splitting. Maintained fork of pdfshuffler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711611 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- pdfarranger-1.3.0-2.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-363ee0b8a9 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1714009] Review Request: python-dictdumper - A Python dict formatted dumper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1714009 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- python-dictdumper-0.7.1-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-5e695f9a10 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1714013] Review Request: python-pypcapkit - A Python multi-engine PCAP analyse kit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1714013 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- python-pypcapkit-0.14.2-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-b8faa6f346 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748471] Review Request: xtensor-python - Python bindings for xtensor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748471
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mhron...@redhat.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #9 from Miro Hrončok ---
Package Review
==
_ _ ___ __ __ _
/\ | __ \| __ \| __ \ \/ / __ \| | __ \
/ \ | |__) | |__) | |__) \ \ / / | | | |__ | | | |
/ /\ \ | ___/| ___/| _ / \ \/ /| | | | __| | | | |
/ \| || || | \ \ \ / | |__| | || |__| |
/_/\_\_||_||_| \_\ \/ \/|__|_/
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: BSD file in source RPM, not shipped in built one.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[?]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]:
[Bug 1748471] Review Request: xtensor-python - Python bindings for xtensor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748471 --- Comment #8 from serge_sans_paille --- Thanks again for the review, I indeed forgot a large part of the spec file, everything got re-uploaded again. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1722656] Review Request: python-sybil - Automated testing for the examples in your documentation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722656 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2019-dce13e06da has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-dce13e06da -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1722656] Review Request: python-sybil - Automated testing for the examples in your documentation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722656 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2019-1c404f682c has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-1c404f682c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1751846] Review Request: python-neurodsp - Neurodsp is a package of tools to analyze and simulate neural time series
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751846 --- Comment #2 from Aniket Pradhan --- Spec URL (updated): https://major.fedorapeople.org/python-neurodsp.spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1751846] Review Request: python-neurodsp - Neurodsp is a package of tools to analyze and simulate neural time series
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751846 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||sanjay.an...@gmail.com Blocks||1276941 (fedora-neuro) Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|sanjay.an...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) --- Thanks! Looking at this now! Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276941 [Bug 1276941] Fedora NeuroImaging and NeuroScience tracking bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1751216] Review Request: xlunch - Graphical app launcher for X with minimal dependencies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751216 --- Comment #3 from Artem --- https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/xlunch/fedora-30-x86_64/01032084-xlunch/xlunch.spec https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/xlunch/fedora-30-x86_64/01032084-xlunch/xlunch-4.5.3-7.fc30.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1751846] New: Review Request: python-neurodsp - Neurodsp is a package of tools to analyze and simulate neural time series
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751846 Bug ID: 1751846 Summary: Review Request: python-neurodsp - Neurodsp is a package of tools to analyze and simulate neural time series Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: aniket17...@iiitd.ac.in QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/~Ym4gvFEClwinF9LQXYlVA SRPM URL: https://major.fedorapeople.org/python-neurodsp-2.0.0-1.fc30.src.rpm Fedora Account System Username: major Description: Hello there! I would highly appreciate if anyone could review python-neurodsp. I am currently a package maintainer in the Neuro-Fedora SIG but it will be my first package that I am submitting myself. Neurodsp is a package of tools to analyze and simulate neural time series, using digital signal processing. Koji build statuses are shared below: Rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=37574535 F31: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=37574591 F30: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=37574678 F29: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=37574755 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1739786] Review Request: python-makefun - Dynamically create python functions with a proper signature
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1739786 --- Comment #16 from Miro Hrončok --- I am waiting for new mock to be deployed on Koji. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1739786] Review Request: python-makefun - Dynamically create python functions with a proper signature
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1739786 --- Comment #15 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) --- We can proceed here---Miro said they'd make an announcement to -devel about the experimental macros. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1751590] Review Request: bugzilla2fedmsg - Consume BZ messages over STOMP and republish to Fedora Messaging
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751590 Adam Williamson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||awill...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Adam Williamson --- We have %py3_build and %py3_install macros - maybe use those? Shouldn't LICENSE be %license, not %doc? What's the deal with all the commented-out Requires: lines? Shouldn't those be reviewed and if appropriate updated, or removed? Per the guidelines - https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/ - the package that contains the modules (in this case, there is only one package) *must* Provides: python3-(modulename) for each module - https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_provides . It doesn't matter that this is an application, as long as it's shipping modules installed to the system-wide path it needs to follow the rules for modules. FWIW I would usually separate the modules into one or more subpackages and have the 'binary' in its own package that depended on the module subpackages, but that's not required. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1750823] Review Request: virt-p2v - Convert a physical machine to run on KVM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750823 --- Comment #4 from Pino Toscano --- (In reply to Richard W.M. Jones from comment #3) > Issues: > === > - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) > in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) > for the package is included in %license. > Note: License file COPYING is not marked as %license > See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- > guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text > > It seems as if the %doc COPYING should be moved to %license COPYING. Fixed. > [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. > Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: > /usr/lib64/virt-p2v(virt-p2v-maker), > /usr/share/virt-p2v(virt-p2v-maker) > > I'm not very clear on what if anything f-r is complaining about here, > but I can see no actual problem with the %files section. I guess it found out that the existing virt-p2v-maker package also owns these directories. > [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. > > It's a noarch package because it doesn't contain any ELF binaries which run > on the host. Right, and I added a comment about that in the spec file. > [-]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. > > The package is ExclusiveArch: x86-64 because it only works on x86. Ditto. > virt-p2v.x86_64: W: self-obsoletion virt-p2v-maker < 1:1.41.5 obsoletes > virt-p2v-maker = 1:1.41.0-1.fc32 > > I believe this is actually a bug, of a sort. The problem is that we have > released virt-p2v with a lower version number than the old libguestfs > package. Hmm... the options I see are: 1) package the next virt-p2v upstream release (which will be 1.42.0) 2) bump the epoch 3) not add Provides: virt-p2v-maker until virt-p2v is >= 1.42.0 > virt-p2v.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/virt-p2v/kiwi-config.sh > 644 /bin/bash > virt-p2v.x86_64: E: non-executable-script > /usr/share/virt-p2v/launch-virt-p2v 644 /bin/bash - > > These are real bugs. - kiwi-config.sh is a template of KIWI configuration, and the real configuration file is generated by virt-p2v-make-kiwi - launch-virt-p2v is either copied in the guest by virt-p2v-make-disk (and made executable), or embedded in the p2v.ks file created by virt-p2v-make-kickstart (which makes it executable) > virt-p2v.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/virt-p2v/launch-virt-p2v > virt-p2v.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/virt-p2v/p2v.ks.in > > Also possible bugs. Indeed -- sent an easy fix upstream: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2019-September/msg00079.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1747552] Review Request: libdfp - Decimal Floating Point library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747552 Hanns-Joachim Uhl changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1737946 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1747552] Review Request: libdfp - Decimal Floating Point library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747552 Hanns-Joachim Uhl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugpr...@us.ibm.com, ||d...@danny.cz Link ID||IBM Linux Technology Center ||181451 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1714013] Review Request: python-pypcapkit - A Python multi-engine PCAP analyse kit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1714013 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- python-pypcapkit-0.14.2-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-fbcd9b70e7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1711611] Review Request: pdfarranger - PDF file merging, rearranging, and splitting. Maintained fork of pdfshuffler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711611 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- pdfarranger-1.3.0-2.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-13eff29405 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1747852] Review Request: golang-github-aablinov-caddy-geoip - Caddy plugin to resolve user GeoIP data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747852 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-aablinov-caddy-geoip-0-0.1.20190911gitc06787a.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-b59a000d37 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1747855] Review Request: golang-github-caddyserver-dnsproviders - DNS providers adapted for use in Caddy to solve the ACME DNS challenge
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747855 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-caddyserver-dnsproviders-0.3.0-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-4193240f15 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1751535] Review Request: python-fsspec - File-system specification
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751535 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-fsspec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1750823] Review Request: virt-p2v - Convert a physical machine to run on KVM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750823
--- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %license.
Note: License file COPYING is not marked as %license
See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text
It seems as if the %doc COPYING should be moved to %license COPYING.
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[-]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[-]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Provides: bundled(gnulib) in place as required.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "GPL (v2 or later)", "GNU General
Public License (v2) GNU Lesser General Public License (v2)", "GPL (v2
or later) (with incorrect FSF address)", "GNU Lesser General Public
License (v2 or later)", "FSF Unlimited License (with Retention)",
"Expat License", "GPL (v3 or later)", "ISC License GPL (v3 or later)".
61 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/var/tmp/1750823-virt-p2v/licensecheck.txt
The over all license is correct.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
Note: Dirs in package are owned also by:
/usr/lib64/virt-p2v(virt-p2v-maker),
/usr/share/virt-p2v(virt-p2v-maker)
I'm not very clear on what if anything f-r is complaining about here,
but I can see no actual problem with the %files section.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
It will temporarily conflict with libguestfs, but we intend to correct
that soon.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
Provides/Obsoletes are correct AFAICT.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
It's a noarch package because it doesn't contain any ELF binaries which run
on the host.
[-]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
The package is ExclusiveArch: x86-64 because it only works on x86.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 30720 bytes in 2 files.
[-]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages
[Bug 1743767] Review Request: monitor-edid - simple tool for reading the EDID from a monitor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1743767 --- Comment #6 from Pat Riehecky --- I'm not showing membership to https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/monitor-edid/ I'm getting : $ git push X11 forwarding request failed on channel 0 Counting objects: 8, done. Delta compression using up to 8 threads. Compressing objects: 100% (6/6), done. Writing objects: 100% (7/7), 3.71 KiB | 0 bytes/s, done. Total 7 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0) remote: Branch refs/heads/master is unsupported remote: Denied push for ref 'refs/heads/master' for user 'jcpunk' remote: All changes have been rejected To ssh://jcp...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/rpms/monitor-edid ! [remote rejected] master -> master (pre-receive hook declined) error: failed to push some refs to 'ssh://jcp...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/rpms/monitor-edid' -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748471] Review Request: xtensor-python - Python bindings for xtensor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748471 --- Comment #7 from Miro Hrončok --- Changelog doesn't match release (and a release is zero). --- A note: xtensor-python-0.23.1/cmake/FindNumPy.cmake is MIT but is not shipped in the built RPM (OK). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748471] Review Request: xtensor-python - Python bindings for xtensor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748471
--- Comment #6 from Miro Hrončok ---
This is a header only library.
See
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_packaging_header_only_libraries
%package devel
Summary:%{summary}
Provides: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
Provides: %{name}-static = %{version}-%{release}
Requires: pybind11-devel
Requires: python3-devel
Requires: xtensor-devel
Requires: python3-numpy
%description devel %_description
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1718540] Review Request: davs2 - An open-source decoder of AVS2-P2/IEEE1857.4 video coding standard
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718540 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tcall...@redhat.com Flags|needinfo?(extras-qa@fedorap | |roject.org) | --- Comment #11 from Tom "spot" Callaway --- Based on what material I can see, this package (along with any other AVS or AVS2 encoders/decoders) is not permissible in Fedora. Looking specifically at this AVS2 implementation, which is licensed under GPLv2, it is worth noting the following license clause: * 7. If, as a consequence of a court judgment or allegation of patent infringement or for any other reason (not limited to patent issues), conditions are imposed on you (whether by court order, agreement or otherwise) that contradict the conditions of this License, they do not excuse you from the conditions of this License. If you cannot distribute so as to satisfy simultaneously your obligations under this License and any other pertinent obligations, then as a consequence you may not distribute the Program at all. For example, if a patent license would not permit royalty-free redistribution of the Program by all those who receive copies directly or indirectly through you, then the only way you could satisfy both it and this License would be to refrain entirely from distribution of the Program. * It would be necessary (at a minimum) to have a GPLv2 compatible patent license in order to resolve this issue. Today, our only option is to refrain entirely from distribution of the Program. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1751692] Review Request: php-swaggest-json-schema - High definition PHP structures with JSON-schema based validation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751692 Remi Collet changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1751726 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751726 [Bug 1751726] Review Request: php-williamdes-mariadb-mysql-kbs - An index of the MariaDB and MySQL Knowledge bases -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1751726] Review Request: php-williamdes-mariadb-mysql-kbs - An index of the MariaDB and MySQL Knowledge bases
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751726 Remi Collet changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1751692 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751692 [Bug 1751692] Review Request: php-swaggest-json-schema - High definition PHP structures with JSON-schema based validation -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1751726] New: Review Request: php-williamdes-mariadb-mysql-kbs - An index of the MariaDB and MySQL Knowledge bases
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751726 Bug ID: 1751726 Summary: Review Request: php-williamdes-mariadb-mysql-kbs - An index of the MariaDB and MySQL Knowledge bases Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: fed...@famillecollet.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://git.remirepo.net/cgit/rpms/php/williamdes/php-williamdes-mariadb-mysql-kbs.git/plain/php-williamdes-mariadb-mysql-kbs.spec?id=378e427e1b46127b3f9b94467686f9b046834c8d SRPM URL: http://rpms.remirepo.net/SRPMS/php-williamdes-mariadb-mysql-kbs-1.2.7-1.remi.src.rpm Description: An index of the MariaDB and MySQL Knowledge bases. Autoloader: /usr/share/php/Williamdes/MariaDBMySQLKBS/autoload.php Fedora Account System Username: remi New dependency of phpMyAdmin -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1745834] Review Request: R-lifecycle - Manage the Life Cycle of your Package Functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1745834 --- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla --- Done. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1744287] Review Request: golang-mongodb-mongo-driver - Go driver for MongoDB
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744287 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tcall...@redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Tom "spot" Callaway --- (In reply to Elliott Sales de Andrade from comment #5) > Yes, looking a little closer, it appears that all mongo-*-drivers are still > in Fedora, so I don't think we need to wait for legal. I'll approve then. FWIW, I concur. Just be on the lookout in case any SSPL licensed code makes its way into this component. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1751690] Review Request: php-swaggest-json-diff - JSON diff/rearrange/patch/pointer library for PHP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751690 Remi Collet changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1751692 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751692 [Bug 1751692] Review Request: php-swaggest-json-schema - High definition PHP structures with JSON-schema based validation -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1751639] Review Request: php-phplang-scope-exit - Emulation of SCOPE_EXIT construct from C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751639 Remi Collet changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1751692 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751692 [Bug 1751692] Review Request: php-swaggest-json-schema - High definition PHP structures with JSON-schema based validation -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1751692] Review Request: php-swaggest-json-schema - High definition PHP structures with JSON-schema based validation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751692 Remi Collet changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1751690, 1751639 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751639 [Bug 1751639] Review Request: php-phplang-scope-exit - Emulation of SCOPE_EXIT construct from C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751690 [Bug 1751690] Review Request: php-swaggest-json-diff - JSON diff/rearrange/patch/pointer library for PHP -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1751692] New: Review Request: php-swaggest-json-schema - High definition PHP structures with JSON-schema based validation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751692 Bug ID: 1751692 Summary: Review Request: php-swaggest-json-schema - High definition PHP structures with JSON-schema based validation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: fed...@famillecollet.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://git.remirepo.net/cgit/rpms/php/swaggest/php-swaggest-json-schema.git/plain/php-swaggest-json-schema.spec?id=66911f7b4b30c8a10259afde9d65837307003ed3 SRPM URL: http://rpms.remirepo.net/SRPMS/php-swaggest-json-schema-0.12.17-1.remi.src.rpm Description: High definition PHP structures with JSON-schema based validation. Autoloader: /usr/share/php/Swaggest/JsonSchema/autoload.php Fedora Account System Username: remi -- New build dependency in the phpMyAdmin stack -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1751690] New: Review Request: php-swaggest-json-diff - JSON diff/rearrange/patch/pointer library for PHP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751690 Bug ID: 1751690 Summary: Review Request: php-swaggest-json-diff - JSON diff/rearrange/patch/pointer library for PHP Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: fed...@famillecollet.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://git.remirepo.net/cgit/rpms/php/swaggest/php-swaggest-json-diff.git/plain/php-swaggest-json-diff.spec?id=87461589fbea195bd200d90145be2a14d4891323 SRPM URL: http://rpms.remirepo.net/SRPMS/php-swaggest-json-diff-3.7.0-1.remi.src.rpm Description: A PHP implementation for finding unordered diff between two JSON documents. Autoloader: /usr/share/php/Swaggest/JsonDiff/autoload.php Fedora Account System Username: remi -- new build dependency in the phpMyAdmin stack -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1751660] New: Review Request: python-casttube - A library to support complex camera ISPs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751660 Bug ID: 1751660 Summary: Review Request: python-casttube - A library to support complex camera ISPs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: pbrobin...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora SPEC: https://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/python-casttube.spec SRPM: https://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/python-casttube-0.2.0-1.fc30.src.rpm Description: Casttube is a python library which a way to interact with the Youtube Chromecast api. koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=37624273 FAS: pbrobinson -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1751660] Review Request: python-casttube - A library to support complex camera ISPs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751660 Peter Robinson changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1716247 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1716247 [Bug 1716247] pychromecast uninstallable due to missing casttube -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1711611] Review Request: pdfarranger - PDF file merging, rearranging, and splitting. Maintained fork of pdfshuffler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711611 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2019-363ee0b8a9 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-363ee0b8a9 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1711611] Review Request: pdfarranger - PDF file merging, rearranging, and splitting. Maintained fork of pdfshuffler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711611 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2019-13eff29405 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-13eff29405 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1750579] Review Request: python-argon2-cffi - The secure Argon2 password hashing algorithm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750579 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added CC||quantum.anal...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- Argon2 is packaged; you should use the system copy to build this package https://argon2-cffi.readthedocs.io/en/stable/installation.html#using-a-system-wide-installation-of-argon2 Also, can use %pypi_source as Source0. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1751639] New: Review Request: php-phplang-scope-exit - Emulation of SCOPE_EXIT construct from C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751639 Bug ID: 1751639 Summary: Review Request: php-phplang-scope-exit - Emulation of SCOPE_EXIT construct from C++ Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: fed...@famillecollet.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://git.remirepo.net/cgit/rpms/php/phplang/php-phplang-scope-exit.git/plain/php-phplang-scope-exit.spec?id=3ce7c5b8331b3e027a2da6afd98d8923e16607d1 SRPM URL: http://rpms.remirepo.net/SRPMS/php-phplang-scope-exit-1.0.0-1.remi.src.rpm Description: This simple class provides an implementation of C++'s SCOPE_EXIT, or GoLang's defer. To use, assign an instance of this object to a local variable. When that variable falls out of scope (or is explicitly unset), the callback passed to the constructor will be invoked. This is useful, for example, to aid cleanup at the end of a function. Autoloader: /usr/share/php/PhpLang/scope-exit-autoload.php Fedora Account System Username: remi -- New build dependency in phpMyAdmin stack -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1326504] Review Request: htslib - C library for high-throughput sequencing data formats (required for `samtools`)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326504 --- Comment #19 from Jun Aruga --- > By the way, as I failed to run `fedora-review -b 1326504`, I reported opening > the ticket to fedora-review: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1650620 . Mistake. This URL. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751630 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1326504] Review Request: htslib - C library for high-throughput sequencing data formats (required for `samtools`)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326504 --- Comment #18 from Jun Aruga --- Created attachment 1614420 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1614420=edit review.txt by fedora-review command I attach review.txt file that is the result of the fedora-review command. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1326504] Review Request: htslib - C library for high-throughput sequencing data formats (required for `samtools`)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326504 --- Comment #17 from Jun Aruga --- Dave, Adam thanks for the reviewing. By the way, as I failed to run `fedora-review -b 1326504`, I reported opening the ticket to fedora-review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1650620 . `fedora-review -n /path/to/htslib-1.9-1.fc32.src.rpm --rpm-spec` worked. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1751535] Review Request: python-fsspec - File-system specification
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751535
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zbys...@in.waw.pl
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
I'd use the standard %global _description %{expand: ... } trick to avoid
repeated %description text.
> Summary: File-system specification
Maybe: Pythonic interface to file system concepts
("file system" is the standard spelling.)
+ package name is OK
+ builds and installs OK
+ latest version
+ license is acceptable (BSD 3-clause)
+ license is specified correctly
Package is APPROVED.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1751590] New: Review Request: bugzilla2fedmsg - Consume BZ messages over STOMP and republish to Fedora Messaging
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751590 Bug ID: 1751590 Summary: Review Request: bugzilla2fedmsg - Consume BZ messages over STOMP and republish to Fedora Messaging Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: aurel...@bompard.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://abompard.fedorapeople.org/reviews/bugzilla2fedmsg/bugzilla2fedmsg.spec SRPM URL: https://abompard.fedorapeople.org/reviews/bugzilla2fedmsg/bugzilla2fedmsg-1.0.0-1.fc30.src.rpm Description: A consumer that listens to bugzilla over STOMP and reproduces messages on a Fedora Messaging bus Fedora Account System Username: abompard Note: this is a re-review of the existing python-bugzilla2fedmsg package that has been retired. See https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8776 I have renamed it because it's actually not a python library, just an app written in Python, so according to the guidelines it should not be prefixed with "python-". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1663504] Review Request: mbrola - speech synthetizer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1663504 Tomas Korbar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Last Closed||2019-09-12 08:06:38 --- Comment #2 from Tomas Korbar --- After discussions with upstream and consultations with Fedora-legal mailing list we have come to conclusion that Mbrola can not be packaged into Fedora because of non-free voice files. Mbrola does not provide without them reasonable amount of functionalities so it depends on them. Upstream said that maintainers listed in voice files are not responding and without their consent they can not change their license. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1645764] Review Request: grim - Grab images from a Wayland compositor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645764 Till Hofmann changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sway-sig@lists.fedoraprojec ||t.org --- Comment #7 from Till Hofmann --- Also here, can you please update to the latest release? Then I'll continue reviewing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1645765] Review Request: slurp - Select a region in a Wayland compositor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645765 --- Comment #5 from Till Hofmann --- Can we get the package wrapped up? I reconsidered my comment about the licensing, apparently this is handled differently for MIT-licensed projects, MIT doesn't have the requirement that the license is mentioned in every source file. So this is not a blocker. If you can update the package to the latest release, I can continue (or rather re-do) the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1751535] Review Request: python-fsspec - File-system specification
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751535 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1707957 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1707957 [Bug 1707957] python-dask-2.3.0 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1751535] Review Request: python-fsspec - File-system specification
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751535 --- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- This package built on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=37618516 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1750983] Review Request: oomd - Userspace Out-Of-Memory (OOM) killer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750983 --- Comment #6 from Igor Gnatenko --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/oomd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1751535] New: Review Request: python-fsspec - File-system specification
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751535 Bug ID: 1751535 Summary: Review Request: python-fsspec - File-system specification Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: quantum.anal...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//python-fsspec.spec SRPM URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//python-fsspec-0.4.4-1.fc30~bootstrap.src.rpm Description: Filesystem Spec is a project to unify various projects and classes to work with remote filesystems and file-system-like abstractions using a standard pythonic interface. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
