[Bug 1786827] Review Request: ghc-prettyprinter - A modern, easy to use, well-documented, extensible pretty-printer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786827 --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/21948 (f30) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1786827] Review Request: ghc-prettyprinter - A modern, easy to use, well-documented, extensible pretty-printer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786827 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-7521770d75 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-7521770d75 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1796711] Review Request: python-readthedocs-sphinx-ext - Sphinx extension for Read the Docs overrides
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1796711 Jerry James changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2020-02-04 04:07:15 --- Comment #4 from Jerry James --- Built in Rawhide. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1796711] Review Request: python-readthedocs-sphinx-ext - Sphinx extension for Read the Docs overrides
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1796711 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-readthedocs-sphinx-ext -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1792086] Review Request: mopidy-mpd - Mopidy extension for controlling Mopidy from MPD clients
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1792086 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- mopidy-mpd-3.0.0-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-a08ae7304c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1795077] Review Request: python-shodan - Python library and command-line utility for Shodan.io
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795077 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- python-shodan-1.21.3-3.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-63f57a07ee -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1769843] Review Request: low-memory-monitor - Monitors low-memory conditions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1769843 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System --- low-memory-monitor-2.0-3.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1795077] Review Request: python-shodan - Python library and command-line utility for Shodan.io
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795077 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- python-shodan-1.21.3-3.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-0761f5dedd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1786829] Review Request: ghc-repline - Haskeline wrapper for GHCi-like REPL interfaces
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786829 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- ghc-repline-0.2.1.0-2.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-c70493d342 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1791527] Review Request: ghc-curl - Haskell binding to libcurl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1791527 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- ghc-curl-1.3.8-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-533e1c73ed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1786830] Review Request: ghc-text-metrics - Calculate various string metrics efficiently
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786830 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- ghc-text-metrics-0.3.0-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-01c0047530 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1786831] Review Request: ghc-path - Support for well-typed paths
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786831 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- ghc-path-0.6.1-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-ee352f3e65 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1767906] Review Request: ghc-microlens-ghc - Microlens + array, bytestring, containers, transformers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1767906 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- ghc-microlens-ghc-0.4.10-3.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-9c9c2b2acc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1767751] Review Request: ghc-data-clist - Simple functional ring type
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1767751 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- ghc-data-clist-0.1.2.3-2.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-3517818b1f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1767756] Review Request: ghc-word-wrap - A library for word-wrapping
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1767756 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- ghc-word-wrap-0.4.1-3.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-50e366dee5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1796711] Review Request: python-readthedocs-sphinx-ext - Sphinx extension for Read the Docs overrides
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1796711 --- Comment #2 from Jerry James --- Thanks for the review! (In reply to Sandro Mani from comment #1) > (Curiosity: [1] states that the pyproject macros work if the project > includes pyproject.toml, but the sources contain no such file. So how is > this actually working?) I'm afraid I don't know the answer to that question myself, although I'm sure Miro does. It looks like the commands invoked by the pyproject macros must parse setup.py, since they find the requests and Jinja2 dependencies. Either that or they invoke black magic. Possibly both. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1793187] Review Request: dnscrypt-proxy2 - Flexible DNS proxy, with support for encrypted DNS protocols
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1793187 --- Comment #3 from Hirotaka Wakabayashi --- Hello Robert-André Please update the verion from 2.0.36 to 2.0.39. https://github.com/DNSCrypt/dnscrypt-proxy/releases/tag/2.0.39 Thanks in advance, Hirotaka Wakabayashi -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1796711] Review Request: python-readthedocs-sphinx-ext - Sphinx extension for Read the Docs overrides
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1796711
Sandro Mani changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Sandro Mani ---
Not terribly familiar with pyproject-rpm-macros, but it looks like it also
autogenerates BR: python3-devel, so the issue marked below is a non-issue.
Hence all good as far as I can see!
(Curiosity: [1] states that the pyproject macros work if the project includes
pyproject.toml, but the sources contain no such file. So how is this actually
working?)
[1]
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pyproject-rpm-macros/blob/master/f/README.md
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[-]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified
[Bug 1794564] Review Request: babeltrace2 - A trace manipulation toolkit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1794564 --- Comment #1 from Hirotaka Wakabayashi --- Hello Michael, Please see the comments. 1. Architecture s390x should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch if this package doesn't support the s390x architecture. Please see: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_architecture_build_failures I found a build error on s390x architecture in a Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41310129 2. python3-bt2's description python3-bt2 package should have a descrption. Please see: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_summary_and_description 3. License The base package, which is "babeltrace2" in this case, should include the upstream license file. Please see: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_spec_file_naming This package should contain a comment explaining the multiple licensing breakdown. Please see: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_multiple_licensing_scenarios Best Regards, Hirotaka Wakabayashi -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1785495] Review Request: python-pwntools - A CTF framework and exploit development library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1785495 --- Comment #12 from W. Michael Petullo --- Upstream bug: https://github.com/Gallopsled/pwntools/issues/1404 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1795469] Review Request: string-template-maven-plugin - Execute StringTemplate files during a maven build
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795469 Jerry James changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2020-02-03 20:38:25 --- Comment #7 from Jerry James --- Built in Rawhide. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1795470] Review Request: antlr4-project - Parser generator (ANother Tool for Language Recognition)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795470 Bug 1795470 depends on bug 1795469, which changed state. Bug 1795469 Summary: Review Request: string-template-maven-plugin - Execute StringTemplate files during a maven build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795469 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1792086] Review Request: mopidy-mpd - Mopidy extension for controlling Mopidy from MPD clients
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1792086 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-a08ae7304c has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-a08ae7304c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1795469] Review Request: string-template-maven-plugin - Execute StringTemplate files during a maven build
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795469 --- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/string-template-maven-plugin -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1795469] Review Request: string-template-maven-plugin - Execute StringTemplate files during a maven build
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795469 --- Comment #5 from Jerry James --- Thanks for the suggestions. I will apply both of those when I import the package. Thank you for the review! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1796145] Review Request: commoncpp2 - GNU Common C++ class framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1796145
--- Comment #2 from Jerry James ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
===
- Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 15329280 bytes in 605 files.
See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
guidelines/#_documentation
- The license situation is more complex than indicated. First, the main
license
appears to be "GPLv2+ with exceptions" rather than "GPLv2 with exceptions";
see the boilerplate text at the top of the files in inc/cc++. The "any later
version" text is included.
Some glibc files are included, licensed as LGPLv2+. See src/getopt*.
Perhaps
they do not get compiled into the final library, though. Please check that.
The texinfo documentation is licensed with the GNU Free Documentation License
(GFDL): see doc/fdl.texi and doc/fdlnotice.texi.
- Unless you are going to build for EPEL, %ldconfig_scriptlets can be
omitted.
- Please add %{?_isa} to the libxml2-devel and zlib-devel Requires in the
devel subpackage.
- Regarding the bug fixed in commoncpp2-inaddr.patch, a similar bug is caught
by the compiler in another place. See this in the build log:
socket.cpp: In member function 'ost::Socket::Error ost::UDPSocket::join(const
ost::IPV4Multicast&, int)':
socket.cpp:1563:50: warning: argument to 'sizeof' in 'void* memcpy(void*, const
void*, size_t)' call is the same pointer type 'in_addr*' as the destination;
expected 'in_addr' or an explicit length [-Wsizeof-pointer-memaccess]
1563 | memcpy(_address, _addr,
sizeof(_addr));
|
^~~~
The "&" should be removed from the sizeof operator's argument.
- Consider adding a %check script
- Please see the missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid rpmlint warning. I
realize that upstream is dead, but this should be patched.
- The mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs rpmlint warning should be easy to clear up.
Just changes the tabs on lines 54 and 55 to spaces.
- The unused-direct-shlib-dependency warnings indicate that this project
suffers
the same problem as all libtool-based project; libtool helpfully rearranges
the linker flags so that -Wl,--as-needed appears *after* all of the
libraries.
This bug has been known about for a really long time, yet the libtool
developers haven't fixed it. Thanks, libtool! I like to use this snippet
in my spec files, placed between %configure and %make_build:
# Get rid of undesirable hardcoded rpaths; workaround libtool reordering
# -Wl,--as-needed after all the libraries.
sed -e 's|^hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=.*|hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=""|g' \
-e 's|^runpath_var=LD_RUN_PATH|runpath_var=DIE_RPATH_DIE|g' \
-e 's|CC="\(g..\)"|CC="\1 -Wl,--as-needed"|' \
-i libtool
- The obsolete m4 warnings can be fixed by making the following changes to
configure.ac:
Replace AM_PROG_LIBTOOL with LT_INIT()
Replace AM_CONFIG_HEADER(config.h) with AC_CONFIG_HEADERS([config.h])
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "Expat License", "GPL (v3 or later)",
"GPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)", "*No copyright* GPL
(v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)", "GNU Free Documentation
License (v1.2 or later)", "GNU Free Documentation License", "*No
copyright* GNU Free Documentation License (v1.2 or later)", "FSF
Unlimited License (with Retention) GPL (v2 or later)", "FSF Unlimited
License (with Retention)", "GNU Lesser General Public License (v2.1 or
later)". 153 files have unknown license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel
[Bug 1786829] Review Request: ghc-repline - Haskeline wrapper for GHCi-like REPL interfaces
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786829 --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/21941 (f30) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1786829] Review Request: ghc-repline - Haskeline wrapper for GHCi-like REPL interfaces
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786829 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-c70493d342 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-c70493d342 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1797524] Review Request: sourcextractor++ - A program that extracts a catalog of sources from astronomical images
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797524 Alejandro Alvarez changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #1 from Alejandro Alvarez --- Forgot the username in Fedora: aalvarez -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1786830] Review Request: ghc-text-metrics - Calculate various string metrics efficiently
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786830 --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/21940 (f30) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1796711] Review Request: python-readthedocs-sphinx-ext - Sphinx extension for Read the Docs overrides
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1796711 Sandro Mani changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||manisan...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|manisan...@gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1796145] Review Request: commoncpp2 - GNU Common C++ class framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1796145 Jerry James changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||loganje...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|loganje...@gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jerry James --- I will take this review. Can you take bug 1796711? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1786831] Review Request: ghc-path - Support for well-typed paths
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786831 --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/21939 (f30) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1786831] Review Request: ghc-path - Support for well-typed paths
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786831 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-ee352f3e65 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-ee352f3e65 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1793156] Review Request: rr - Tool to record and replay execution of applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1793156 William Cohen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-02-03 14:44:32 --- Comment #19 from William Cohen --- Package now in Fedora Rawhide, https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1455361 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1760617] Review Request: mmc - A GPU mesh-based Monte Carlo photon simulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1760617
--- Comment #26 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
(In reply to Qianqian Fang from comment #23)
> thanks for the review.
>
> the updated spec file can be found at
>
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/fangq/fedorapkg/mmclab/mmc.spec
>
> but it does not build any more. the issue is related to how to
> "%octpkglibdir". I would like to know how to fix this.
>
>
> > Please check this---fedora review failed to install the packages.
>
> I managed to reproduce this issue using mock, see the mock log attached at
> the bottom.
>
> basically, the issue is that mmc/octave-mmclab has a dependency to
> octave-iso2mesh, but it complains libmpfr.so.4 could not be installed. I
> found that this .so file is part of mpfr package.
>
> I already listed mpfr-devel in octave-iso2mesh's spec file, and from the
> mpfr's spec, it the devel package depends on the main package, so assuming
> that both mpfr and mpfr-devel should have been installed for
> octave-iso2mesh. but somehow, they were not.
>
> can you let me know if this is a problem for iso2mesh? or I did not use mock
> properly?
I'm not seeing the dep error anymore. So I'm not sure what was happening here.
I don't think iso2mesh should Require: mpfr-devel, but we can discuss that in a
different bug (or on the ML).
> > > octave-mmc has a mex file, so it should not be noarch, should it. Please
> > check. The files should go to %octpkglibdir instead of %octpkgdir too.
>
> I did not specify BuildArch for octave-mmclab. From the generated rpms, it
> seems is not noarch. the only two noarch packages are mmc-demos and
> mmclab-demos, can you verify if this is the case?
>
> I tried to follow the arch-specific octave template
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:
> Octave#Arch_specific_Octave_spec_template
>
> and made the follow change, but rpmbuild failed, complaining that directory
> not found. is this the right way to add %{octpkglibdir}? I also removed %dir
> as the template showed, then it complains both file missing and dir missing.
>
I've opened a PR with a tweak that just puts the mex file in the right place.
The octave macros don't seem to do it---but I will email the ML to confirm.
If you can have a look at it and submit the updated spec/srpm links, I'll
re-run fedora-review on everything. I think we're quite close to completion
here. :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1797301] Review Request: perl-Array-IntSpan - Handles arrays using integer ranges
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797301 --- Comment #2 from Sandro Mani --- Spec URL: https://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Array-IntSpan.spec SRPM URL: https://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Array-IntSpan-2.003-2.fc32.src.rpm %changelog * Mon Feb 03 2020 Sandro Mani - 2.003-2 - Fix license - Drop BR perl(:VERSION) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1797301] Review Request: perl-Array-IntSpan - Handles arrays using integer ranges
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797301 --- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova --- Source file is ok Summary is ok License FIX: Artistic 1.0 is not a valid license for Fedora More info about it can be found https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#Bad_Licenses $ rpmlint ./perl-Array-IntSpan* perl-Array-IntSpan.noarch: W: invalid-license Artistic perl-Array-IntSpan.src: W: invalid-license Artistic 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Description is ok URL and Source0 are ok All tests passed BuildRequires are ok TODO: perl(:VERSION) can be removed, the dependency is used mainly for Perl version constrain. $ rpm -qp --requires perl-Array-IntSpan-2.003-1.fc32.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c | grep -v rpmlib 1 perl(Array::IntSpan) 1 perl(Carp) 1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.30.1) 1 perl(overload) 1 perl(strict) 1 perl(vars) 1 perl(warnings) Binary requires are Ok. $ rpm -qp --provides perl-Array-IntSpan-2.003-1.fc32.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 perl(Array::IntSpan) = 2.003 1 perl-Array-IntSpan = 2.003-1.fc32 1 perl(Array::IntSpan::Fields) = 2.002 1 perl(Array::IntSpan::IP) = 1.01 Binary provides are Ok. Please correct 'FIX' issue and consider fixing 'TODO' item and provide new spec file. Resolution: Not approved -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1791527] Review Request: ghc-curl - Haskell binding to libcurl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1791527 --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/21938 (f30) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1791527] Review Request: ghc-curl - Haskell binding to libcurl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1791527 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-533e1c73ed has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-533e1c73ed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1778512] Review Request: brightnessctl - commandline utility for controlling brightness
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1778512 Christian Kellner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ckell...@redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Christian Kellner --- Sorry, totally missed that when I filed the bug to un-retire the package (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795018). I used the patches to use systemd-logind instead of the suid binary because I think that is a much better way. I am very happy to have james.p.elf...@gmail.com as co-maintainer. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1797524] New: Review Request: sourcextractor++ - A program that extracts a catalog of sources from astronomical images
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797524 Bug ID: 1797524 Summary: Review Request: sourcextractor++ - A program that extracts a catalog of sources from astronomical images Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: a.alvarezayl...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/astrorama/copr/b3791574b45acf09c7604535d6057cc273fd6b58/SourceXtractor%2B%2B/sourcextractor%2B%2B.spec SRPM URL: https://dl.bintray.com/astrorama/archive/sourcextractor++-0.8-1.fc31.src.rpm Description: sourcextractor++ is a program that extracts a catalog of sources from astronomical images. It is the successor to the original SExtractor package. This software is the successor of sextractor2, which is already on Fedora[1] Rawhide build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41339121 Fedora 32 build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41339118 [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/sextractor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1797301] Review Request: perl-Array-IntSpan - Handles arrays using integer ranges
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797301 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jples...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jples...@redhat.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
