[Bug 1820915] Review Request: bettercap - Tool for 802.11, BLE/Ethernet reconnaissance and MITM attacks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820915 Bug 1820915 depends on bug 1820847, which changed state. Bug 1820847 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-adrianmo-nmea - NMEA parser library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820847 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1820847] Review Request: golang-github-adrianmo-nmea - NMEA parser library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820847 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-05-04 04:55:54 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-dcd80c48f4 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1820915] Review Request: bettercap - Tool for 802.11, BLE/Ethernet reconnaissance and MITM attacks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820915 Bug 1820915 depends on bug 1820854, which changed state. Bug 1820854 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-antchfx-jsonquery - Jsonq package for Go https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820854 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1820854] Review Request: golang-github-antchfx-jsonquery - Jsonq package for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820854 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-05-04 04:55:52 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-8d59588171 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1830220] Review Request (Unretiring): tilda - A Gtk based drop down terminal for Linux and Unix
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830220
Lyes Saadi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||fed...@lyes.eu
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|fed...@lyes.eu
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Flags||fedora-review?
||needinfo?(johannes.lips@goo
||glemail.com)
--- Comment #1 from Lyes Saadi ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
===
- If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %license.
Note: License file COPYING is not marked as %license
See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text
- Bundled libraries! I've found: tomboykeybinder.c/.h from tomboy, xerror.c/.h
from openbox, eggaccelerators.c/.h from... no idea! They should at least be
declared.
- Missing license for bundled libraries (MIT) and proper breakdown license
(GPLv2 and MIT).
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU Lesser General Public License",
"*No copyright* GNU Lesser General Public License (v2 or later)", "GNU
Lesser General Public License (v2 or later)", "GPL (v3 or later)",
"Expat License", "GPL (v2 or later)". 60 files have unknown license.
Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/lyes/Documents/reviews/1830220-tilda/licensecheck.txt
[-]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[!]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: The spec file handles locales properly.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 51200 bytes in 5 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or
desktop-file-validate if there is such a file.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using
[Bug 1823001] Review Request: simde - SIMD Everywhere
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823001 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2020-89e4b0a22d has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1702720] Review Request: frr - routing daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1702720 Robert Scheck changed: What|Removed |Added CC||redhat-bugzilla@linuxnetz.d ||e --- Comment #20 from Robert Scheck --- Martin, this package review was unfortunately not as good as it could have been, because bug #1830808, bug #1830806, bug #1830800, bug #1830798 and bug #1830797 already existed while the package review happened (as per https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/frr/blob/463257a2ddcf53c9d227f35c3d071b3c0bb69710/f/frr.spec) but it still passed the review. Please treat this as simple "heads up" for future package reviews - thank you :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1823599] Review Request: gjots2 - A heirarchical note jotter. Organise your ideas, notes, facts in a tree
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823599
Alexander Ploumistos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #25 from Alexander Ploumistos ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: The spec file handles locales properly.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 378880 bytes in 10 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or
desktop-file-validate if there is such a file.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %check is
[Bug 1823599] Review Request: gjots2 - A heirarchical note jotter. Organise your ideas, notes, facts in a tree
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823599 --- Comment #24 from Bob Hepple --- Here we go: SPEC URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/wef/gjots2/fedora-31-x86_64/01365851-gjots2/gjots2.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/wef/gjots2/fedora-31-x86_64/01365851-gjots2/gjots2-3.1.6-2.fc31.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1824348] Review Request: bowtie2 - A read aligner for genome sequencing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824348 --- Comment #10 from Jun Aruga --- Hi I fixed every point you mentioned upsating Spec and SRPM URLs. Here is the modification. https://github.com/junaruga/fedora-bowtie2/commit/a09cc9aa542dd190ff0a4a54ca1ad8ae1a31947a I checked rpmlint, the binary RPM installation and scratch build here. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=44066815 Could you review again? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1830712] Review Request: kronometer - A simple KDE stopwatch application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830712 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #3 from Raphael Groner --- Please follow the guidelines to get sponsored as a packager. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1830712] Review Request: kronometer - A simple KDE stopwatch application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830712
--- Comment #2 from Raphael Groner ---
Please use a link to raw spec file to properly get it downloadable.
E.g.
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/andreamtp/kronometer/master/kronometer.spec
> Release: 0%{?dist}
Please start with value 1, also in %changelog.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1117223] Review Request: kronometer - A simple KDE stopwatch application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117223 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added Alias|kronometer | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1830712] Review Request: kronometer - A simple KDE stopwatch application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830712 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||projects...@smart.ms Blocks|201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449 [Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter response should be blocking this bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1830712] Review Request: kronometer - A simple KDE stopwatch application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830712 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) --- Comment #1 from Raphael Groner --- *** Bug 1117223 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449 [Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter response should be blocking this bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1117223] Review Request: kronometer - A simple KDE stopwatch application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117223 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||projects...@smart.ms Blocks||201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Last Closed||2020-05-03 19:54:57 --- Comment #7 from Raphael Groner --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1830712 *** Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449 [Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter response should be blocking this bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1830741] Review Request: doctest - Feature-rich header-only C++ testing framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830741 José Matos changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jama...@fc.up.pt Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #1 from José Matos --- Is not this already being reviewed at #1828205? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1830765] Re-Review Request: python-markups - A wrapper around various text markups
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830765 José Matos changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1830763 Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830763 [Bug 1830763] Review Request: python-markdown-math - Math extension for Python-Markdown -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1830763] Review Request: python-markdown-math - Math extension for Python-Markdown
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830763 José Matos changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1830765 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830765 [Bug 1830765] Re-Review Request: python-markups - A wrapper around various text markups -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1830767] Re-Review Request: retext - Simple editor for Markdown and reStructuredText
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830767 José Matos changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1830765 Summary|Review Request: retext -|Re-Review Request: retext - |Simple editor for Markdown |Simple editor for Markdown |and reStructuredText|and reStructuredText Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #1 from José Matos --- This is re-review since this package was already in Fedora and it was orphaned last year. I did not notice on time last year so I am bring it back here. One advantage of retext is that it supports several markup languages. This package depends on python-markups (also a re-review) and on python-markdown-math that is a new package required by the update to python-markups. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830765 [Bug 1830765] Re-Review Request: python-markups - A wrapper around various text markups -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1830765] Re-Review Request: python-markups - A wrapper around various text markups
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830765 José Matos changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1830767 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830767 [Bug 1830767] Re-Review Request: retext - Simple editor for Markdown and reStructuredText -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1830767] New: Review Request: retext - Simple editor for Markdown and reStructuredText
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830767 Bug ID: 1830767 Summary: Review Request: retext - Simple editor for Markdown and reStructuredText Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jama...@fc.up.pt QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://jamatos.fedorapeople.org/retext/retext.spec SRPM URL: https://jamatos.fedorapeople.org/retext/retext-7.1.0-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: ReText is simple text editor that supports Markdown and reStructuredText markup languages. It is written in Python using PyQt libraries. It supports live preview, tabs, math formulas, export to various formats including PDF and HTML. Fedora Account System Username: jamatos -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1830765] New: Re-Review Request: python-markups - A wrapper around various text markups
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830765 Bug ID: 1830765 Summary: Re-Review Request: python-markups - A wrapper around various text markups Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jama...@fc.up.pt QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://jamatos.fedorapeople.org/python-markups/python-markups.spec SRPM URL: https://jamatos.fedorapeople.org/python-markups/python-markups-3.0.0-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: This module provides a wrapper around various text markup languages. Available by default are Markdown_, reStructuredText_ and Textile_, but you can easily add your own markups. Fedora Account System Username: jamatos This is a re-review since this package was orphaned last year. It is required to bring retext back to Fedora. At the same time this update over the last supported version requires python-markdown-math that is not yet in Fedora. A review request is already submitted and I will add a Blocks there. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1830763] Review Request: python-markdown-math - Math extension for Python-Markdown
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830763 José Matos changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #1 from José Matos --- This is a very simple package, actually just a single module/file. This package is necessary to bring back (re-review) python-markups that is required by (another re-review) retext. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1830763] New: Review Request: python-markdown-math - Math extension for Python-Markdown
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830763 Bug ID: 1830763 Summary: Review Request: python-markdown-math - Math extension for Python-Markdown Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jama...@fc.up.pt QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://jamatos.fedorapeople.org/python-markdown-math/python-markdown-math.spec SRPM URL: https://jamatos.fedorapeople.org/python-markdown-math/python-markdown-math-0.6-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: Extension for Python-Markdown: this extension adds math formulas support to Python-Markdown. Fedora Account System Username: jamatos -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1830086] Review Request: git-pw - Git-Patchwork integration tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830086
Artur Iwicki changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fed...@svgames.pl
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
--- Comment #1 from Artur Iwicki ---
>Spec URL: https://github.com/getpatchwork/git-pw/blob/master/rpm/git-pw.spec
This link leads to a syntax-highlighted HTML rendition of the file. Please use
the "raw file" links.
>%global name git-pw
>%define version 1.9.0
Uhh, why? If you write "Name: git-pw" it will automatically define a %{name}
macro. The same for the Version: tag and %{version} macro.
>Requires: python3-arrow
>Requires: python3-click
>Requires: python3-requests
>Requires: python3-setuptools
>Requires: python3-six
>Requires: python3-tabulate
I think those are not needed, since they will be emitted by the automatic
Python dependency generator.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_automatically_generated_dependencies
>%description
>git-pw is a tool for integrating Git with Patchwork, the web-based patch \
>tracking system.
Putting a backslash at the end of the line escapes the newline and merges those
two lines into a single, 89-chars long line. There should be no lines in
%description that are longer than 80 characters.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_summary_and_description
>%{_mandir}/man1/git-pw*.1.gz
Do not assume that man pages will be gzipped. You should use a wildcard that
can match any compression method (including no compression at all).
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_manpages
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1830741] New: Review Request: doctest - Feature-rich header-only C++ testing framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830741 Bug ID: 1830741 Summary: Review Request: doctest - Feature-rich header-only C++ testing framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: vit...@easycoding.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://github.com/EasyCoding/doctest/raw/master/doctest.spec SRPM URL: https://xvitaly.fedorapeople.org/for-review/doctest-2.3.7-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: Feature-rich C++11/14/17/20 header-only testing framework for unit tests and TDD Fedora Account System Username: xvitaly -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1827880] Review Request: fswatch - A cross-platform file change monitor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827880 --- Comment #5 from Darryl T. Agostinelli --- Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dagostinelli/fswatch-packaging/master/fswatch.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/dagostinelli/fswatch-packaging/raw/master/fswatch-1.14.0-2.fc32.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1827880] Review Request: fswatch - A cross-platform file change monitor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827880 --- Comment #4 from Darryl T. Agostinelli --- During package review? I know we do this once it's checked into https://src.fedoraproject.org/ I made the change as requested. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1823599] Review Request: gjots2 - A heirarchical note jotter. Organise your ideas, notes, facts in a tree
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823599 --- Comment #23 from Alexander Ploumistos --- Yup, it builds fine without python3-setuptools. *Sigh* One more little thing to do and we can put this behind us… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1117223] Review Request: kronometer - A simple KDE stopwatch application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117223 Andrea Perotti changed: What|Removed |Added CC||apero...@redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Andrea Perotti --- Since this was stale for 4 years, I've packaged here a more recent version of it: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830712 probably this bz can be closed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1117223] Review Request: kronometer - A simple KDE stopwatch application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117223 Andrea Perotti changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1830712 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830712 [Bug 1830712] Review Request: kronometer - A simple KDE stopwatch application -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1830712] New: Review Request: kronometer - A simple KDE stopwatch application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830712 Bug ID: 1830712 Summary: Review Request: kronometer - A simple KDE stopwatch application Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: apero...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: extras...@fedoraproject.org, i...@cicku.me, ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org, nob...@fedoraproject.org, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com Depends On: 1117223 (kronometer) Blocks: 656997 (kde-reviews) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://github.com/andreamtp/kronometer/blob/master/kronometer.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/andreamtp/kronometer/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01364401-kronometer/kronometer-2.2.3-0.fc33.src.rpm Kronometer is a stopwatch application. Kronometer is free software and it's released under the GPLv2 license. Fedora Account System Username: andreamtp I was looking for a stopwatch for KDE and found kronometer was missing in Fedora, so I've packaged. I've already done some packaging for persona use, but this is my rpm for Fedora. COPR builds of the packages: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/andreamtp/kronometer/ Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656997 [Bug 656997] kde-related package review tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117223 [Bug 1117223] Review Request: kronometer - A simple KDE stopwatch application -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1830529] Re-Review Request: seahorse-adventures - Retro side-scrolling platformer game
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830529
Andrea Musuruane changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||musur...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Andrea Musuruane ---
Version 1.2 has been tagged:
https://github.com/dulsi/seahorse-adventures/releases
%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/**/apps/%{name}.png
Are the two asterisks a typo?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1830529] Re-Review Request: seahorse-adventures - Retro side-scrolling platformer game
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830529 Artur Iwicki changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1364745 (FE-GAMESIG) Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364745 [Bug 1364745] Games SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1827880] Review Request: fswatch - A cross-platform file change monitor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827880
--- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter ---
This would be 1.14.0-2 aka with "Release: 2%{?dist}". There was a change
and it requires a new release with a changelog entry.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1823599] Review Request: gjots2 - A heirarchical note jotter. Organise your ideas, notes, facts in a tree
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823599 --- Comment #22 from Miro Hrončok --- Yes, the setup.py has: from distutils.core import setup No, setuptools. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1823599] Review Request: gjots2 - A heirarchical note jotter. Organise your ideas, notes, facts in a tree
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823599 --- Comment #21 from Miro Hrončok --- > egg-info is a file in this package, not a directory so I am not giving it a > trailing slash after all. Oh, in that case, maybe BuildRequires: python3-setuptools is not needed, becasue setuptools create a directory. Let me check... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1828813] Review Request: bashtop - Resource monitor written in bash that shows usage and stats for processor, memory, disks, network and processes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828813 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-aed8695f2e has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-aed8695f2e` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-aed8695f2e See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1823599] Review Request: gjots2 - A heirarchical note jotter. Organise your ideas, notes, facts in a tree
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823599 --- Comment #20 from Bob Hepple --- egg-info is a file in this package, not a directory so I am not giving it a trailing slash after all. Here is the latest build: SPEC URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/wef/gjots2/fedora-31-x86_64/01363503-gjots2/gjots2.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/wef/gjots2/fedora-31-x86_64/01363503-gjots2/gjots2-3.1.6-1.fc31.src.rpm Cheers and thanks again for the reviews! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
