[Bug 1839083] Review Request: kwayland-server - Wayland server components built on KDE Frameworks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839083 Jan Grulich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jgrul...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jgrul...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jan Grulich --- 1) License should be LGPLv2+ and MIT and BSD (same as plasma-wayland-protocols) 2) Naming ok 3) Scriptlets ok 4) Rpmlint ok Looks good. Just fix the license and you are good to go. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839052] Review Request: plasma-wayland-protocols - Plasma Specific Protocols for Wayland
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839052 Jan Grulich changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jan Grulich --- 1) License ok 2) Naming ok 3) Scriptlets ok - not needed 4) Rpmlint ok Looks good now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1836542] Review Request: studio-controls - Studio control for audio devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1836542 Erich Eickmeyer changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-05-25 01:24:01 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839572] New: Review Request: chaos-client - Client to interact with the Chaos DNS API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839572 Bug ID: 1839572 Summary: Review Request: chaos-client - Client to interact with the Chaos DNS API Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/chaos-client.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/chaos-client-0.1.3-1.fc31.src.rpm Project URL: https://github.com/projectdiscovery/chaos-client Description: Go client to communicate with Chaos DNS API. Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=44914269 rpmlint output: $ rpmlint chaos-client-0.1.3-1.fc31.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint chaos-client-* chaos-client.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary chaos 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Fedora Account System Username: fab -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839255] Review Request: rust-dlib - Helper macros for handling manually loading optional system libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839255 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-05-24 18:48:28 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839257] Review Request: rust-wayland-sys - FFI bindings to the various libwayland-*.so libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839257 Bug 1839257 depends on bug 1839255, which changed state. Bug 1839255 Summary: Review Request: rust-dlib - Helper macros for handling manually loading optional system libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839255 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839396] Review Request: rust-podio - Additional trait for Read and Write to read and write Plain Old Data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839396 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-05-24 18:47:44 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839397] Review Request: rust-zip - Library to support the reading and writing of zip files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839397 Bug 1839397 depends on bug 1839396, which changed state. Bug 1839396 Summary: Review Request: rust-podio - Additional trait for Read and Write to read and write Plain Old Data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839396 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1827880] Review Request: fswatch - A cross-platform file change monitor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827880 --- Comment #11 from Darryl T. Agostinelli --- repo requested: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/25250 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839269] Review Request: rust-smithay-client-toolkit - Toolkit for making client wayland applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839269 Bug 1839269 depends on bug 1839254, which changed state. Bug 1839254 Summary: Review Request: rust-calloop - Callback-based event loop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839254 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839254] Review Request: rust-calloop - Callback-based event loop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839254 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-05-24 18:21:20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1827880] Review Request: fswatch - A cross-platform file change monitor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827880 --- Comment #10 from Darryl T. Agostinelli --- Whoop! Whoop! Thx. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839555] Review Request: bloaty - A size profiler for binaries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839555 Rich Mattes changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1839553 Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839553 [Bug 1839553] Review Request: abseil-cpp - C++ Common Libraries -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839553] Review Request: abseil-cpp - C++ Common Libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839553 Rich Mattes changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1839555 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839555 [Bug 1839555] Review Request: bloaty - A size profiler for binaries -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839555] New: Review Request: bloaty - A size profiler for binaries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839555 Bug ID: 1839555 Summary: Review Request: bloaty - A size profiler for binaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: richmat...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://rmattes.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/bloaty/bloaty.spec SRPM URL: https://rmattes.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/bloaty/bloaty-1.1-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: Ever wondered what's making your binary big? Bloaty McBloatface will show you a size profile of the binary so you can understand what's taking up space inside. Bloaty works on binaries, shared objects, object files, and static libraries. Bloaty supports the ELF and Mach-O formats, and has experimental support for WebAssembly. Fedora Account System Username: rmattes rpmlint: $ rpmlint bloaty.spec ../RPMS/x86_64/bloaty-* ../SRPMS/bloaty-1.1-1.fc32.src.rpm bloaty.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) profiler -> profile, profiles, profiled bloaty.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary bloaty bloaty.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) profiler -> profile, profiles, profiled 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. Spelling errors aren't errors, upstream does not provide a manpage. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1838686] Review Request: PDAL - Point Data Abstraction Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686 --- Comment #14 from markusN --- Created attachment 1691596 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1691596=edit updated PDAL spec file -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839553] New: Review Request: abseil-cpp - C++ Common Libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839553 Bug ID: 1839553 Summary: Review Request: abseil-cpp - C++ Common Libraries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: richmat...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://rmattes.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/abseil-cpp/abseil-cpp.spec SRPM URL: https://rmattes.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/abseil-cpp/abseil-cpp-20200225.2-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: Abseil is an open-source collection of C++ library code designed to augment the C++ standard library. The Abseil library code is collected from Google's own C++ code base, has been extensively tested and used in production, and is the same code we depend on in our daily coding lives. In some cases, Abseil provides pieces missing from the C++ standard; in others, Abseil provides alternatives to the standard for special needs we've found through usage in the Google code base. We denote those cases clearly within the library code we provide you. Abseil is not meant to be a competitor to the standard library; we've just found that many of these utilities serve a purpose within our code base, and we now want to provide those resources to the C++ community as a whole. Fedora Account System Username: rmattes rpmlint: $ rpmlint abseil-cpp.spec ../RPMS/x86_64/abseil-cpp-* ../SRPMS/abseil-cpp-20200225.2-1.fc32.src.rpm abseil-cpp.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libabsl_bad_any_cast_impl.so libabsl_bad_any_cast_impl.so abseil-cpp.x86_64: E: library-not-linked-against-libc /usr/lib64/libabsl_bad_any_cast_impl.so abseil-cpp.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libabsl_bad_optional_access.so libabsl_bad_optional_access.so abseil-cpp.x86_64: E: library-not-linked-against-libc /usr/lib64/libabsl_bad_optional_access.so abseil-cpp.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libabsl_bad_variant_access.so libabsl_bad_variant_access.so abseil-cpp.x86_64: E: library-not-linked-against-libc /usr/lib64/libabsl_bad_variant_access.so abseil-cpp.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libabsl_base.so libabsl_base.so abseil-cpp.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libabsl_city.so libabsl_city.so abseil-cpp.x86_64: E: shared-lib-without-dependency-information /usr/lib64/libabsl_city.so abseil-cpp.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libabsl_civil_time.so libabsl_civil_time.so abseil-cpp.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libabsl_cord.so libabsl_cord.so abseil-cpp.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libabsl_debugging_internal.so libabsl_debugging_internal.so abseil-cpp.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libabsl_demangle_internal.so libabsl_demangle_internal.so abseil-cpp.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libabsl_dynamic_annotations.so libabsl_dynamic_annotations.so abseil-cpp.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libabsl_examine_stack.so libabsl_examine_stack.so abseil-cpp.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libabsl_exponential_biased.so libabsl_exponential_biased.so abseil-cpp.x86_64: E: library-not-linked-against-libc /usr/lib64/libabsl_exponential_biased.so abseil-cpp.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libabsl_failure_signal_handler.so libabsl_failure_signal_handler.so abseil-cpp.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libabsl_flags.so libabsl_flags.so abseil-cpp.x86_64: E: shared-lib-without-dependency-information /usr/lib64/libabsl_flags.so abseil-cpp.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libabsl_flags_config.so libabsl_flags_config.so abseil-cpp.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libabsl_flags_internal.so libabsl_flags_internal.so abseil-cpp.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libabsl_flags_marshalling.so libabsl_flags_marshalling.so abseil-cpp.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libabsl_flags_parse.so libabsl_flags_parse.so abseil-cpp.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libabsl_flags_parse.so exit@GLIBC_2.2.5 abseil-cpp.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libabsl_flags_program_name.so libabsl_flags_program_name.so abseil-cpp.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libabsl_flags_registry.so libabsl_flags_registry.so abseil-cpp.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libabsl_flags_registry.so exit@GLIBC_2.2.5 abseil-cpp.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libabsl_flags_usage.so libabsl_flags_usage.so abseil-cpp.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libabsl_flags_usage.so exit@GLIBC_2.2.5 abseil-cpp.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libabsl_flags_usage_internal.so libabsl_flags_usage_internal.so abseil-cpp.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libabsl_graphcycles_internal.so libabsl_graphcycles_internal.so abseil-cpp.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libabsl_hash.so libabsl_hash.so abseil-cpp.x86_64: E:
[Bug 1838686] Review Request: PDAL - Point Data Abstraction Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686 --- Comment #13 from markusN --- I have modified the BRs as follows: --- /home/mneteler/rpmbuild/SPECS/PDAL.spec 2020-05-24 19:16:26.794094506 +0200 +++ PDAL.spec 2020-05-24 18:50:52.810157029 +0200 @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ BuildRequires: cmake BuildRequires: eigen3-devel BuildRequires: gcc-c++ +BuildRequires: gdal BuildRequires: gdal-devel BuildRequires: geos-devel BuildRequires: gtest-devel @@ -39,10 +40,12 @@ BuildRequires: jsoncpp-devel BuildRequires: laszip-devel BuildRequires: libgeotiff-devel +BuildRequires: libpq-devel BuildRequires: libxml2-devel BuildRequires: libzstd-devel BuildRequires: netcdf-cxx-devel BuildRequires: postgresql-devel +BuildRequires: postgresql-server BuildRequires: proj-devel BuildRequires: python3-breathe BuildRequires: python3-devel Still the PG related test fails: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=44909226 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1837019] Review Request: theme-switcher - Switch dark/light GTK theme automatically during day/night
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1837019
--- Comment #3 from Artem ---
Hello! Thanks! Added both, %{?systemd_requires} and systemd scriplets. They was
already before but i removed them due some weird behavior and unit was always
activated, but this was before 2.0 version, seems fine now. We will drop
entirely systemd units in future probably.
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/atim/theme-switcher/fedora-32-x86_64/01405681-theme-switcher/theme-switcher.spec
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/atim/theme-switcher/fedora-32-x86_64/01405681-theme-switcher/theme-switcher-2.0.4-2.fc32.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839472] Review Request: python-grpcio-gcp - gRPC for GCP extensions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839472 --- Comment #2 from Mohamed El Morabity --- Thanks for the review. (In reply to Fabian Affolter from comment #1) > Upstream seems to have a test suite. Should be added to the process. Unfortunately mosts tests for grpc-gcp require Internet. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839470] Review Request: python-googleapis-common-protos - Common protobufs used in Google APIs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839470
--- Comment #2 from Mohamed El Morabity ---
Thanks for your review :)
> The upstream URL should point to
> https://github.com/googleapis/api-common-protos instead of PyPI from mym
> point of view.
And you're right, seems better.
> Could you please remove any possible available eggs in %prep, e.g., rm -rf
> %{pypi_name}.egg-info?
Good catch
All of these issues will be fixed at import.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1832562] Review Request: tpcclib - Tools for processing data from Turku PET Centre (TPC)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1832562 Purusharth S changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(sanjay.ankur@gmai ||l.com) --- Comment #4 from Purusharth S --- Hey Ankur, Thanks for letting me know. I wasn't sure if the `fedora-review` would pick up the urls from the comments so I updated the previous one itself. Will keep that in mind :) And, thanks for the review as well. Here are the updated files: Spec URL: https://pagure.io/tpcclib/raw/version-0.7.5/f/tpcclib.spec SRPM URL: https://pagure.io/tpcclib/raw/version-0.7.5/f/tpcclib-0.7.5-1.fc32.src.rpm Koji Build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=44424439 I've kept the licence as GPLv3 itself as per the discussion over devel. I also confirmed it with upstream over email (below) > The files with GPL 2 license were actually not included in compilation and > are now removed. > Most of the small files without license are test data which obviously cannot > be edited to contain > license, but I have omitted the license from individual code files too, > because I hope it would be sufficient to have GPL3 in the main docs, covering > the whole library. Let me know if this is okay? Also, I have some questions wrt reviewing process. Will ask that over sig irc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1790091] Review Request: androwarn - Static code analyzer for malicious Android applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1790091 Bug 1790091 depends on bug 1786653, which changed state. Bug 1786653 Summary: Review Request: androguard - Reverse engineering, mal- or goodware analysis of Android applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786653 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1808299] Review Request: shuffledns - Wrapper around massdns
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808299 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-05-24 15:33:22 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1786653] Review Request: androguard - Reverse engineering, mal- or goodware analysis of Android applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786653 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-05-24 15:33:35 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839542] Review Request: snallygaster - Tool to scan for secret files on HTTP servers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839542 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||563471 (FE-SECLAB) Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563471 [Bug 563471] Tracker: Review Requests for Fedora Security Lab related packages -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839542] New: Review Request: snallygaster - Tool to scan for secret files on HTTP servers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839542 Bug ID: 1839542 Summary: Review Request: snallygaster - Tool to scan for secret files on HTTP servers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/snallygaster.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/snallygaster-0.0.6-1.fc31.src.rpm Project URL: https://github.com/hannob/snallygaster Description: snallygaster is a tool that looks for files accessible on web servers that shouldn't be public and can pose a security risk.Typical examples include publicly accessible git repositories, backup files potentially containing passwords or database dumps. Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=44906768 rpmlint output: $ rpmlint snallygaster-0.0.6-1.fc31.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint snallygaster-0.0.6-1.fc31.noarch.rpm snallygaster.noarch: W: no-documentation snallygaster.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary snallygaster 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Fedora Account System Username: fab -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1827939] Review Request: ardour6 - Digital Audio Workstation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827939
--- Comment #2 from Guido Aulisi ---
This section is not correct imho, it seems that if checks are not enabled, then
appdata is not validated:
> %if %{with tests}
> %check
> WAFTPATH="$PWD/doc/waft"
> pushd libs/ardour
> sh "$WAFTPATH" --targets=libardour-tests && LV2_PATH= ./run-tests.sh
> popd
> # check appdata file
> appstream-util validate-relax --nonet
> %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/appdata/%{name}.appdata.xml
> %endif
> rm -f %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/run-tests
I would change it to:
%check
%if %{with tests}
WAFTPATH="$PWD/doc/waft"
pushd libs/ardour
sh "$WAFTPATH" --targets=libardour-tests && LV2_PATH= ./run-tests.sh
popd
rm -f %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/run-tests
%endif
# check appdata file
appstream-util validate-relax --nonet
%{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/appdata/%{name}.appdata.xml
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1535549] Review Request: mupen64plus - Nintendo 64 Emulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535549 --- Comment #33 from Wade Berrier --- I made some progress on this: * adapted upstream patch to fix the build (thanks for finding those) and pushed to the repository * requested branches for f32 and f31 * added dreua to users list as admin It'll be curious to see the upstream response on 2.5.9. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1832392] Review Request: python-typeguard - Run-time type checker for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1832392
--- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter ---
Hmmm, I was looking at a different spec file when I was talking about the unit
tests perhaps. My bad.
Could you please upload the new spec file (aka Release: 2%{?dist})? Thanks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839526] New: Review Request: goaltdns - Permutation generation tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839526 Bug ID: 1839526 Summary: Review Request: goaltdns - Permutation generation tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/goaltdns.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/goaltdns-0-0.1.20200524git2b3e8a3.fc31.src.rpm Project URL: https://github.com/subfinder/goaltdns Description: A permutation generation tool written in Golang. Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=44904600 rpmlint output: $ rpmlint goaltdns-0-0.1.20200524git2b3e8a3.fc31.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint goaltdns-* goaltdns.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary goaltdns 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Fedora Account System Username: fab -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1827880] Review Request: fswatch - A cross-platform file change monitor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827880 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Fabian Affolter --- Issues were addressed, packaged APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1836319] Review Request: hanyang-gothic-a1-fonts - Elegant Korean and Latin font family
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1836319 Antonio T. (sagitter) changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Antonio T. (sagitter) --- (In reply to Artur Iwicki from comment #5) > > [!]: Run repo-font-audit on all fonts in package. > > Note: Cannot find repo-font-audit, install fontpackages-tools package > > to make a comprehensive font review. > fontpackages-tools was retired and is no longer present in F32+: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fontpackages/c/ > e1b656bab2373bba68dfe478ebb768a60276f296?branch=f32 > fonts-rpm-macros even provides an Obsoletes: for it: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fonts-rpm-macros/blob/f32/f/fonts-rpm- > macros.spec > > >[!]: Run ttname on all fonts in package. > > Note: Cannot find ttname command, install ttname package to make a > > comprehensive font review. > ttname is dead since Fedora 30, maybe even longer: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=16910 > > I guess those should be filed as bugs against fedora-review? Oh, okay. Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1820972] Review Request: ohmybackup - Scan for backup directories and backup files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820972 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter --- Thank you very much for the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839478] Review Request: python-uamqp - AMQP 1.0 client library for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839478
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter ---
Could you please remove any possible available eggs in %prep, e.g., rm -rf
%{pypi_name}.egg-info?
Add it before the import.
Otherwise, package APPROVED.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "Expat License". 318 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/fab/Documents/repos/reviews/1839478-python-
uamqp/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 30720 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
packages named
[Bug 1839513] New: Review Request: golang-github-panjf2000-ants - Goroutine pool in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839513 Bug ID: 1839513 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-panjf2000-ants - Goroutine pool in Go Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-panjf2000-ants.spec SRPM URL: Project URL: https://github.com/panjf2000/ants Description: ants implements a goroutine pool with fixed capacity, managing and recycling a massive number of goroutines, allowing developers to limit the number of goroutines in your concurrent programs. Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=44903231 rpmlint output: $ rpmlint golang-github-panjf2000-ants-2.4.0-1.fc31.src.rpm golang-github-panjf2000-ants.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Goroutine -> Go routine, Go-routine, Routine golang-github-panjf2000-ants.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US goroutine -> go routine, go-routine, routine golang-github-panjf2000-ants.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US goroutines -> go routines, go-routines, routines golang-github-panjf2000-ants.src: W: no-%build-section 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. $ rpmlint golang-github-panjf2000-ants-devel-2.4.0-1.fc31.noarch.rpm golang-github-panjf2000-ants-devel.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Goroutine -> Go routine, Go-routine, Routine golang-github-panjf2000-ants-devel.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US goroutine -> go routine, go-routine, routine golang-github-panjf2000-ants-devel.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US goroutines -> go routines, go-routines, routines golang-github-panjf2000-ants-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/panjf2000/ants/.goipath 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. Fedora Account System Username: fab -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1836319] Review Request: hanyang-gothic-a1-fonts - Elegant Korean and Latin font family
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1836319 --- Comment #5 from Artur Iwicki --- > [!]: Run repo-font-audit on all fonts in package. > Note: Cannot find repo-font-audit, install fontpackages-tools package to > make a comprehensive font review. fontpackages-tools was retired and is no longer present in F32+: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fontpackages/c/e1b656bab2373bba68dfe478ebb768a60276f296?branch=f32 fonts-rpm-macros even provides an Obsoletes: for it: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fonts-rpm-macros/blob/f32/f/fonts-rpm-macros.spec >[!]: Run ttname on all fonts in package. > Note: Cannot find ttname command, install ttname package to make a > comprehensive font review. ttname is dead since Fedora 30, maybe even longer: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=16910 I guess those should be filed as bugs against fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1827939] Review Request: ardour6 - Digital Audio Workstation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827939
Guido Aulisi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||guido.aul...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Guido Aulisi ---
Some quick findings:
Fix path of Droid Sans Mono
> # ArdourMono.ttf is really Droid Sans Mono
> ln -snf ../fonts/google-droid/DroidSansMono.ttf
> %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name}/ArdourMono.ttf
ln -snf ../fonts/google-droid-sans-mono-fonts/DroidSansMono.ttf
%{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name}/ArdourMono.ttf
Ardour 6 is out now, the package should be updated.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839507] New: Review Request: golang-github-3th1nk-cidr - Golang lib to calculate CIDR network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839507 Bug ID: 1839507 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-3th1nk-cidr - Golang lib to calculate CIDR network Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-3th1nk-cidr.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-3th1nk-cidr-0-0.1.20200524gitac57bd3.fc31.src.rpm Project URL: https://github.com/3th1nk/cidr Description: Golang library to calculate CIDR network. Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=44902946 rpmlint output: $ rpmlint golang-github-3th1nk-cidr-0-0.1.20200524gitac57bd3.fc31.src.rpm golang-github-3th1nk-cidr.src: W: no-%build-section 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint golang-github-3th1nk-cidr-devel-0-0.1.20200524gitac57bd3.fc31.noarch.rpm golang-github-3th1nk-cidr-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/3th1nk/cidr/.goipath 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Fedora Account System Username: fab -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839503] New: Review Request: golang-github-valyala-fasthttp - Fast HTTP package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839503 Bug ID: 1839503 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-valyala-fasthttp - Fast HTTP package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-valyala-fasthttp.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-valyala-fasthttp-0.1.0-1.fc31.src.rpm Project URL: https://github.com/valyala/fasthttp Description: Fast HTTP package for Go. Tuned for high performance. Zero memory allocations in hot paths. Up to 10x faster than net/http. Koji scratch build: missing dependency rpmlint output: $ rpmlint golang-github-valyala-fasthttp-0.1.0-1.fc31.src.rpm golang-github-valyala-fasthttp.src: W: no-%build-section 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint golang-github-valyala-fasthttp-devel-0.1.0-1.fc31.noarch.rpm golang-github-valyala-fasthttp-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/valyala/fasthttp/.goipath 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Fedora Account System Username: fab -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839500] Review Request: golang-github-valyala-tcplisten - Customizable TCP Listener
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839500 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1839503 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839503 [Bug 1839503] Review Request: golang-github-valyala-fasthttp - Fast HTTP package -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839503] Review Request: golang-github-valyala-fasthttp - Fast HTTP package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839503 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1839500 Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839500 [Bug 1839500] Review Request: golang-github-valyala-tcplisten - Customizable TCP Listener -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839473] Review Request: python-opencensus-proto - Language Independent Interface Types For OpenCensus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839473
--- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter ---
Could you please remove any possible available eggs in %prep, e.g., rm -rf
%{pypi_name}.egg-info?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839478] Review Request: python-uamqp - AMQP 1.0 client library for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839478 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||m...@fabian-affolter.ch Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|m...@fabian-affolter.ch Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839475] Review Request: python-msal - Microsoft Authentication Library (MSAL) for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839475
--- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter ---
Sorry, I missed one.
Could you please remove any possible available eggs in %prep, e.g., rm -rf
%{pypi_name}.egg-info?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839470] Review Request: python-googleapis-common-protos - Common protobufs used in Google APIs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839470
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter ---
The upstream URL should point to
https://github.com/googleapis/api-common-protos instead of PyPI from mym point
of view.
Could you please remove any possible available eggs in %prep, e.g., rm -rf
%{pypi_name}.egg-info?
Please fix the issue before the import.
Package APPROVED.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "*No copyright* Apache License (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated",
"*No copyright* Apache License", "Apache License (v2.0)". 60 files
have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/fab/Documents/repos/reviews/1839470-python-googleapis-common-
protos/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/lib/python3.8/site-
packages/google(python3-protobuf)
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x ]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[!]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
[Bug 1535549] Review Request: mupen64plus - Nintendo 64 Emulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535549 --- Comment #32 from David Auer --- On the linking issue: Thanks Paul, I didn't find this yesterday. I absolutely agree that this is the way to go. (i.e. apply this patch downstream until it is released and disregard my linker workaround) On the old release issue: Would we violate hard rules by packaging Version 2.5.9 which is declared as pre-release / beta on the Github page [1] ? I generally agree that we should ship stable releases but this case may be worth an exception. I asked upstream [2] for clarification because they seem to suggest that 2.5.9 is a release and additionally some distributions [3] are shipping it. 1: https://github.com/mupen64plus/mupen64plus-core/releases 2: https://github.com/mupen64plus/mupen64plus-core/issues/353#issuecomment-633222060 3: https://repology.org/project/mupen64plus/versions -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839500] New: Review Request: golang-github-valyala-tcplisten - Customizable TCP Listener
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839500 Bug ID: 1839500 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-valyala-tcplisten - Customizable TCP Listener Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-valyala-tcplisten.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-valyala-tcplisten-0-0.1.20200524gitceec8f9.fc31.src.rpm Project URL: https://github.com/valyala/tcplisten Description: Customizable TCP net.-Listener for Go. Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=44901551 rpmlint output: $ rpmlint golang-github-valyala-tcplisten-0-0.1.20200524gitceec8f9.fc31.src.rpm golang-github-valyala-tcplisten.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Customizable -> Customization golang-github-valyala-tcplisten.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Customizable -> Customization golang-github-valyala-tcplisten.src: W: no-%build-section 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. $ rpmlint golang-github-valyala-tcplisten-devel-0-0.1.20200524gitceec8f9.fc31.noarch.rpm golang-github-valyala-tcplisten-devel.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Customizable -> Customization golang-github-valyala-tcplisten-devel.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Customizable -> Customization golang-github-valyala-tcplisten-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/valyala/tcplisten/.goipath 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. Fedora Account System Username: fab -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839470] Review Request: python-googleapis-common-protos - Common protobufs used in Google APIs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839470 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||m...@fabian-affolter.ch Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|m...@fabian-affolter.ch Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839472] Review Request: python-grpcio-gcp - gRPC for GCP extensions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839472
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter ---
Upstream seems to have a test suite. Should be added to the process.
If the tests are passing, please add it before the import.
Package APPROVED
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache License (v2.0)",
"Apache License (v2.0)". 61 files have unknown license. Detailed
output of licensecheck in
/home/fab/Documents/repos/reviews/1839472-python-grpcio-
gcp/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are
[Bug 1825673] Review Request: padthv1 - An old-school polyphonic additive synthesizer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825673 Guido Aulisi changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #1 from Guido Aulisi --- Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~tartina/padthv1.spec SRPM URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~tartina/padthv1-0.9.14-1.fc33.src.rpm New upstream version 0.9.14 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839472] Review Request: python-grpcio-gcp - gRPC for GCP extensions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839472 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||m...@fabian-affolter.ch Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|m...@fabian-affolter.ch Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839473] Review Request: python-opencensus-proto - Language Independent Interface Types For OpenCensus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839473
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache License (v2.0)",
"Apache License (v2.0)". 52 files have unknown license. Detailed
output of licensecheck in
/home/fab/Documents/repos/reviews/1839473-python-opencensus-
proto/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/opencensus
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib/python3.8/site-
packages/opencensus
[-]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[- ]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 3 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[ ]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[ ]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[ ]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from
[Bug 1838686] Review Request: PDAL - Point Data Abstraction Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686 --- Comment #12 from Sandro Mani --- Adding BR: /usr/bin/gdalinfo will solve the second one, the first one might be solved by adding BR: postgresql-server. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839475] Review Request: python-msal - Microsoft Authentication Library (MSAL) for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839475
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "Expat License". 39 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/fab/Documents/repos/reviews/1839475-python-msal/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[ ]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[ ]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[ ]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[-]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages,
[Bug 1839473] Review Request: python-opencensus-proto - Language Independent Interface Types For OpenCensus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839473 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||m...@fabian-affolter.ch Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|m...@fabian-affolter.ch Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839475] Review Request: python-msal - Microsoft Authentication Library (MSAL) for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839475 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||m...@fabian-affolter.ch Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|m...@fabian-affolter.ch Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1838686] Review Request: PDAL - Point Data Abstraction Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686 --- Comment #11 from markusN --- Here the link to the scratch built with the respective root.log: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=44897107 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839488] Review Request: golang-github-projectdiscovery-retryablehttp - Familiar HTTP client interface
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839488 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1839489 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839489 [Bug 1839489] Review Request: nuclei - Tool for configurable targeted scanning -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839489] Review Request: nuclei - Tool for configurable targeted scanning
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839489 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||563471 (FE-SECLAB) Depends On||1839488, 1839464 Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563471 [Bug 563471] Tracker: Review Requests for Fedora Security Lab related packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839464 [Bug 1839464] Review Request: golang-github-projectdiscovery-retryabledns - Retryable DNS client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839488 [Bug 1839488] Review Request: golang-github-projectdiscovery-retryablehttp - Familiar HTTP client interface -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839464] Review Request: golang-github-projectdiscovery-retryabledns - Retryable DNS client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839464 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1839489 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839489 [Bug 1839489] Review Request: nuclei - Tool for configurable targeted scanning -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839489] New: Review Request: nuclei - Tool for configurable targeted scanning
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839489 Bug ID: 1839489 Summary: Review Request: nuclei - Tool for configurable targeted scanning Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/nuclei.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/nuclei-1.1.5-1.fc31.src.rpm Project URL: https://github.com/projectdiscovery/nuclei Description: Nuclei is a fast tool for configurable targeted scanning based on templates offering massive extensibility and ease of use. Koji scratch build: missing dependencies rpmlint output: $ rpmlint nuclei-1.1.5-1.fc31.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint nuclei-* nuclei.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary nuclei 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Fedora Account System Username: fab -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839488] New: Review Request: golang-github-projectdiscovery-retryablehttp - Familiar HTTP client interface
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839488 Bug ID: 1839488 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-projectdiscovery-retryablehttp - Familiar HTTP client interface Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-projectdiscovery-retryablehttp.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-projectdiscovery-retryablehttp-1.0.1-1.fc31.src.rpm Project URL: https://github.com/projectdiscovery/retryablehttp-go Description: Package retryablehttp provides a familiar HTTP client interface with automatic retries and exponential backoff. Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=44898429 rpmlint output: $ rpmlint golang-github-projectdiscovery-retryablehttp-1.0.1-1.fc31.src.rpm golang-github-projectdiscovery-retryablehttp.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US backoff -> back off, back-off, kickoff golang-github-projectdiscovery-retryablehttp.src: W: no-%build-section 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint golang-github-projectdiscovery-retryablehttp-devel-1.0.1-1.fc31.noarch.rpm golang-github-projectdiscovery-retryablehttp-devel.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US backoff -> back off, back-off, kickoff golang-github-projectdiscovery-retryablehttp-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/projectdiscovery/retryablehttp-go/.goipath 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Fedora Account System Username: fab -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839397] Review Request: rust-zip - Library to support the reading and writing of zip files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839397 --- Comment #4 from Igor Raits --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-zip -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1836542] Review Request: studio-controls - Studio control for audio devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1836542 --- Comment #16 from Igor Raits --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/studio-controls -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839255] Review Request: rust-dlib - Helper macros for handling manually loading optional system libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839255 --- Comment #2 from Igor Raits --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-dlib -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839254] Review Request: rust-calloop - Callback-based event loop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839254 --- Comment #2 from Igor Raits --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-calloop -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839396] Review Request: rust-podio - Additional trait for Read and Write to read and write Plain Old Data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839396 --- Comment #2 from Igor Raits --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-podio -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1838686] Review Request: PDAL - Point Data Abstraction Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686 --- Comment #10 from markusN --- Concerning the soname issue, I have asked in the PDAL ticket about the timeline of the next release including the fix. Next I have redone a scratch built, which fails in 2 tests: 98% tests passed, 2 tests failed out of 108 Total Test time (real) = 55.64 sec The following tests FAILED: 1 - pgpointcloudtest (Failed) 85 - pdal_filters_shell_test (Failed) Errors while running CTest error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.fwuQlf (%check) In detail: 1: PDAL_DRIVER_PATH=/builddir/build/BUILD/PDAL-2.1.0-src/lib64 1: Test timeout computed to be: 1000 1: [==] Running 6 tests from 1 test suite. 1: [--] Global test environment set-up. 1: [--] 6 tests from PgpointcloudWriterTest 1: [ RUN ] PgpointcloudWriterTest.write 1: unknown file: Failure 1: C++ exception with description "could not connect to server: No such file or directory <<< maybe impossible to test against PG? 1: Is the server running locally and accepting 1: connections on Unix domain socket "/var/run/postgresql/.s.PGSQL.5432"? 1: " thrown in SetUp(). 1: [ FAILED ] PgpointcloudWriterTest.write (1 ms) 1: [ RUN ] PgpointcloudWriterTest.writeScaled 1: unknown file: Failure 1: C++ exception with description "could not connect to server: No such file or directory 1: Is the server running locally and accepting 1: connections on Unix domain socket "/var/run/postgresql/.s.PGSQL.5432"? 1: " thrown in SetUp(). 1: [ FAILED ] PgpointcloudWriterTest.writeScaled (0 ms) 1: [ RUN ] PgpointcloudWriterTest.writeXYZ 1: unknown file: Failure 1: C++ exception with description "could not connect to server: No such file or directory 1: Is the server running locally and accepting 1: connections on Unix domain socket "/var/run/postgresql/.s.PGSQL.5432"? 1: " thrown in SetUp(). 1: [ FAILED ] PgpointcloudWriterTest.writeXYZ (1 ms) 1: [ RUN ] PgpointcloudWriterTest.writetNoPointcloudExtension 1: unknown file: Failure 1: C++ exception with description "could not connect to server: No such file or directory 1: Is the server running locally and accepting 1: connections on Unix domain socket "/var/run/postgresql/.s.PGSQL.5432"? 1: " thrown in SetUp(). 1: [ FAILED ] PgpointcloudWriterTest.writetNoPointcloudExtension (0 ms) 1: [ RUN ] PgpointcloudWriterTest.writeDeleteTable 1: unknown file: Failure 1: C++ exception with description "could not connect to server: No such file or directory 1: Is the server running locally and accepting 1: connections on Unix domain socket "/var/run/postgresql/.s.PGSQL.5432"? 1: " thrown in SetUp(). 1: [ FAILED ] PgpointcloudWriterTest.writeDeleteTable (0 ms) 1: [ RUN ] PgpointcloudWriterTest.selectExistingSchema 1: unknown file: Failure 1: C++ exception with description "could not connect to server: No such file or directory 1: Is the server running locally and accepting 1: connections on Unix domain socket "/var/run/postgresql/.s.PGSQL.5432"? 1: " thrown in SetUp(). 1: [ FAILED ] PgpointcloudWriterTest.selectExistingSchema (0 ms) 1: [--] 6 tests from PgpointcloudWriterTest (2 ms total) 1: 1: [--] Global test environment tear-down 1: [==] 6 tests from 1 test suite ran. (2 ms total) 1: [ PASSED ] 0 tests. 1: [ FAILED ] 6 tests, listed below: 1: [ FAILED ] PgpointcloudWriterTest.write 1: [ FAILED ] PgpointcloudWriterTest.writeScaled 1: [ FAILED ] PgpointcloudWriterTest.writeXYZ 1: [ FAILED ] PgpointcloudWriterTest.writetNoPointcloudExtension 1: [ FAILED ] PgpointcloudWriterTest.writeDeleteTable 1: [ FAILED ] PgpointcloudWriterTest.selectExistingSchema 1: 1: 6 FAILED TESTS 1/108 Test #1: pgpointcloudtest ...***Failed0.16 sec 85: Test command: /builddir/build/BUILD/PDAL-2.1.0-src/bin/pdal_filters_shell_test 85: Environment variables: 85: PDAL_DRIVER_PATH=/builddir/build/BUILD/PDAL-2.1.0-src/lib64 85: Test timeout computed to be: 1000 85: [==] Running 1 test from 1 test suite. 85: [--] Global test environment set-up. 85: [--] 1 test from ShellFilterTest 85: [ RUN ] ShellFilterTest.test_shell_filter 85: sh: gdalinfo: command not found <<< gdal bins appear to be a test requirement 85: unknown file: Failure 85: C++ exception with description "Command 'gdalinfo -json /builddir/build/BUILD/PDAL-2.1.0-src/test/data/gdal/int16.tif' failed to execute with output ''" thrown in the test body. 85: [ FAILED ] ShellFilterTest.test_shell_filter (43 ms) 85: [--] 1 test from ShellFilterTest (43 ms total) 85: 85: [--] Global test environment tear-down 85: [==] 1 test from 1 test suite ran. (43 ms total) 85: [ PASSED ] 0 tests. 85: [ FAILED ] 1 test, listed below: 85: [ FAILED ] ShellFilterTest.test_shell_filter 85: 85: 1 FAILED TEST
[Bug 1836319] Review Request: hanyang-gothic-a1-fonts - Elegant Korean and Latin font family
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1836319
--- Comment #4 from Antonio T. (sagitter) ---
Check the messages:
fonts:
[!]: Run repo-font-audit on all fonts in package.
Note: Cannot find repo-font-audit, install fontpackages-tools package
to make a comprehensive font review.
See: url: undefined
[!]: Run ttname on all fonts in package.
Note: Cannot find ttname command, install ttname package to make a
comprehensive font review.
See: url: undefined
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla
upstream sources. No licenses found. Please check the source files for
licenses manually.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[-]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
Note: Package contains tarball without URL, check comments
[x]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
= EXTRA items =
Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is
[Bug 1839482] Review Request: golang-github-m-mizutani-urlscan - Urlscan.io client library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839482 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1839483 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839483 [Bug 1839483] Review Request: subfinder - Subdomain discovery tool -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839483] New: Review Request: subfinder - Subdomain discovery tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839483 Bug ID: 1839483 Summary: Review Request: subfinder - Subdomain discovery tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/subfinder.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/subfinder-2.3.4-1.fc31.src.rpm Project URL: https://github.com/projectdiscovery/subfinder Description: Subfinder is a subdomain discovery tool that discovers valid subdomains for websites. Designed as a passive framework to be useful for bug bounties and safe for penetration testing. Koji scratch build: missing dependency rpmlint output: $ rpmlint subfinder-2.3.4-1.fc31.src.rpm subfinder.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Subdomain -> Sub domain, Sub-domain, Domain subfinder.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US subdomain -> sub domain, sub-domain, domain subfinder.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US subdomains -> sub domains, sub-domains, domains 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. $ rpmlint subfinder-* subfinder.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Subdomain -> Sub domain, Sub-domain, Domain subfinder.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US subdomain -> sub domain, sub-domain, domain subfinder.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US subdomains -> sub domains, sub-domains, domains subfinder.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary subfinder 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. Fedora Account System Username: fab -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839483] Review Request: subfinder - Subdomain discovery tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839483 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||563471 (FE-SECLAB) Depends On||1839482 Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563471 [Bug 563471] Tracker: Review Requests for Fedora Security Lab related packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839482 [Bug 1839482] Review Request: golang-github-m-mizutani-urlscan - Urlscan.io client library -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839479] Review Request: python-opencensus - A stats collection and distributed tracing framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839479 Mohamed El Morabity changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1830659 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830659 [Bug 1830659] FTI: python-azure-sdk: python3-azure-sdk -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839478] Review Request: python-uamqp - AMQP 1.0 client library for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839478 Mohamed El Morabity changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1830659 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830659 [Bug 1830659] FTI: python-azure-sdk: python3-azure-sdk -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839476] Review Request: python-msal-extensions - Microsoft Authentication extensions for MSAL Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839476 Mohamed El Morabity changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1830659 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830659 [Bug 1830659] FTI: python-azure-sdk: python3-azure-sdk -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839475] Review Request: python-msal - Microsoft Authentication Library (MSAL) for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839475 Mohamed El Morabity changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1830659 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830659 [Bug 1830659] FTI: python-azure-sdk: python3-azure-sdk -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839480] Review Request: python-opentelemetry - The OpenTelemetry Python client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839480 Mohamed El Morabity changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1830659 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830659 [Bug 1830659] FTI: python-azure-sdk: python3-azure-sdk -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839482] New: Review Request: golang-github-m-mizutani-urlscan - Urlscan.io client library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839482 Bug ID: 1839482 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-m-mizutani-urlscan - Urlscan.io client library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-m-mizutani-urlscan.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-m-mizutani-urlscan-1.0.0-1.fc31.src.rpm Project URL: https://github.com/m-mizutani/urlscan-go Description: Urlscan.io client library in Go. Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=44896648 rpmlint output: $ rpmlint golang-github-m-mizutani-urlscan-1.0.0-1.fc31.src.rpm golang-github-m-mizutani-urlscan.src: W: no-%build-section 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint golang-github-m-mizutani-urlscan-devel-1.0.0-1.fc31.noarch.rpm golang-github-m-mizutani-urlscan-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/m-mizutani/urlscan-go/.goipath 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Fedora Account System Username: fab -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839476] Review Request: python-msal-extensions - Microsoft Authentication extensions for MSAL Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839476 Mohamed El Morabity changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1834085 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1834085 [Bug 1834085] F32FailsToInstall: python3-azure-sdk -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839479] Review Request: python-opencensus - A stats collection and distributed tracing framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839479 Mohamed El Morabity changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1834085 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1834085 [Bug 1834085] F32FailsToInstall: python3-azure-sdk -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839480] Review Request: python-opentelemetry - The OpenTelemetry Python client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839480 Mohamed El Morabity changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1834085 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1834085 [Bug 1834085] F32FailsToInstall: python3-azure-sdk -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839478] Review Request: python-uamqp - AMQP 1.0 client library for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839478 Mohamed El Morabity changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1834085 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1834085 [Bug 1834085] F32FailsToInstall: python3-azure-sdk -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839475] Review Request: python-msal - Microsoft Authentication Library (MSAL) for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839475 Mohamed El Morabity changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1834085 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1834085 [Bug 1834085] F32FailsToInstall: python3-azure-sdk -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839479] Review Request: python-opencensus - A stats collection and distributed tracing framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839479 Mohamed El Morabity changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1839480 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839480 [Bug 1839480] Review Request: python-opentelemetry - The OpenTelemetry Python client -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839480] Review Request: python-opentelemetry - The OpenTelemetry Python client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839480 Mohamed El Morabity changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1839473, 1839479 Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839473 [Bug 1839473] Review Request: python-opencensus-proto - Language Independent Interface Types For OpenCensus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839479 [Bug 1839479] Review Request: python-opencensus - A stats collection and distributed tracing framework -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839473] Review Request: python-opencensus-proto - Language Independent Interface Types For OpenCensus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839473 Mohamed El Morabity changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1839480 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839480 [Bug 1839480] Review Request: python-opentelemetry - The OpenTelemetry Python client -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839480] New: Review Request: python-opentelemetry - The OpenTelemetry Python client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839480 Bug ID: 1839480 Summary: Review Request: python-opentelemetry - The OpenTelemetry Python client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: pikachu.2...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/melmorabity/python-azure-sdk-5/fedora-32-x86_64/01404938-python-opentelemetry/python-opentelemetry.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/melmorabity/python-azure-sdk-5/fedora-32-x86_64/01404938-python-opentelemetry/python-opentelemetry-0.7.1-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: The OpenTelemetry Python client. Fedora Account System Username: melmorabity -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839472] Review Request: python-grpcio-gcp - gRPC for GCP extensions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839472 Mohamed El Morabity changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1839479 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839479 [Bug 1839479] Review Request: python-opencensus - A stats collection and distributed tracing framework -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839477] Review Request: python-google-api-core - Core Library for Google Client Libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839477 Mohamed El Morabity changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1839479 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839479 [Bug 1839479] Review Request: python-opencensus - A stats collection and distributed tracing framework -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839473] Review Request: python-opencensus-proto - Language Independent Interface Types For OpenCensus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839473 Mohamed El Morabity changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1839479 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839479 [Bug 1839479] Review Request: python-opencensus - A stats collection and distributed tracing framework -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839470] Review Request: python-googleapis-common-protos - Common protobufs used in Google APIs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839470 Mohamed El Morabity changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1839479 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839479 [Bug 1839479] Review Request: python-opencensus - A stats collection and distributed tracing framework -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839479] Review Request: python-opencensus - A stats collection and distributed tracing framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839479 Mohamed El Morabity changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1839473, 1839470, 1839477, ||1839472 Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839470 [Bug 1839470] Review Request: python-googleapis-common-protos - Common protobufs used in Google APIs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839472 [Bug 1839472] Review Request: python-grpcio-gcp - gRPC for GCP extensions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839473 [Bug 1839473] Review Request: python-opencensus-proto - Language Independent Interface Types For OpenCensus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839477 [Bug 1839477] Review Request: python-google-api-core - Core Library for Google Client Libraries -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839479] New: Review Request: python-opencensus - A stats collection and distributed tracing framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839479 Bug ID: 1839479 Summary: Review Request: python-opencensus - A stats collection and distributed tracing framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: pikachu.2...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/melmorabity/python-azure-sdk-5/fedora-32-x86_64/01403781-python-opencensus/python-opencensus.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/melmorabity/python-azure-sdk-5/fedora-32-x86_64/01403781-python-opencensus/python-opencensus-0.7.7-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: OpenCensus provides a framework to measure a server's resource usage and collect performance stats. This package contains Python related utilities and supporting software needed by OpenCensus. Fedora Account System Username: melmorabity -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839478] New: Review Request: python-uamqp - AMQP 1.0 client library for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839478 Bug ID: 1839478 Summary: Review Request: python-uamqp - AMQP 1.0 client library for Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: pikachu.2...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/melmorabity/python-azure-sdk-5/fedora-32-x86_64/01403672-python-uamqp/python-uamqp.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/melmorabity/python-azure-sdk-5/fedora-32-x86_64/01403672-python-uamqp/python-uamqp-1.2.8-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: An AMQP 1.0 client library for Python. Fedora Account System Username: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1836319] Review Request: hanyang-gothic-a1-fonts - Elegant Korean and Latin font family
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1836319 Antonio T. (sagitter) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|anto.tra...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839470] Review Request: python-googleapis-common-protos - Common protobufs used in Google APIs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839470 Mohamed El Morabity changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1839477 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839477 [Bug 1839477] Review Request: python-google-api-core - Core Library for Google Client Libraries -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839477] Review Request: python-google-api-core - Core Library for Google Client Libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839477 Mohamed El Morabity changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1839470 Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839470 [Bug 1839470] Review Request: python-googleapis-common-protos - Common protobufs used in Google APIs -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839477] New: Review Request: python-google-api-core - Core Library for Google Client Libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839477 Bug ID: 1839477 Summary: Review Request: python-google-api-core - Core Library for Google Client Libraries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: pikachu.2...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/melmorabity/python-azure-sdk-5/fedora-32-x86_64/01403668-python-google-api-core/python-google-api-core.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/melmorabity/python-azure-sdk-5/fedora-32-x86_64/01403668-python-google-api-core/python-google-api-core-1.17.0-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: This library is not meant to stand-alone. Instead it defines common helpers used by all Google API clients. Fedora Account System Username: melmorabity -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839475] Review Request: python-msal - Microsoft Authentication Library (MSAL) for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839475 Mohamed El Morabity changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1839476 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839476 [Bug 1839476] Review Request: python-msal-extensions - Microsoft Authentication extensions for MSAL Python -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
