[Bug 1878971] New: Review Request: python-jsonref - An implementation of JSON Reference for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878971 Bug ID: 1878971 Summary: Review Request: python-jsonref - An implementation of JSON Reference for Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: aurel...@bompard.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://abompard.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-jsonref/python-jsonref.spec SRPM URL: https://abompard.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-jsonref/python-jsonref-0.2-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: jsonref is a library for automatic dereferencing of JSON Reference objects for Python (supporting Python 2.6+ and Python 3.3+). This library lets you use a data structure with JSON reference objects, as if the references had been replaced with the referent data. Fedora Account System Username: abompard -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1859151] Review Request: rust-rsa - Pure Rust RSA implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859151 Peter Robinson changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1878923 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878923 [Bug 1878923] Review Request: parsec - The PARSEC daemon -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1862548] Review Request: rust-ring - Safe, fast, small crypto using Rust
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862548 Peter Robinson changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1878923 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878923 [Bug 1878923] Review Request: parsec - The PARSEC daemon -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1862796] Review Request: rust-parsec-interface - Parsec interface library to communicate using the wire protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862796 Peter Robinson changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1878923 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878923 [Bug 1878923] Review Request: parsec - The PARSEC daemon -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1859159] Review Request: rust-psa-crypto - Wrapper around the PSA Cryptography API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859159 Peter Robinson changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1878923 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878923 [Bug 1878923] Review Request: parsec - The PARSEC daemon -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1878923] Review Request: parsec - The PARSEC daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878923 Peter Robinson changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1859994 (PARSEC) Depends On||1862796 ||(rust-parsec-interface), ||1878237 ||(rust-picky-asn1-x509), ||1862548 (rust-ring), ||1859151 (rust-rsa), 1859159 ||(rust-psa-crypto), 1847906 ||(rust-tss-esapi) Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1847906 [Bug 1847906] Review Request: rust-tss-esapi - Wrapper around TSS 2.0 Enhanced System API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859151 [Bug 1859151] Review Request: rust-rsa - Pure Rust RSA implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859159 [Bug 1859159] Review Request: rust-psa-crypto - Wrapper around the PSA Cryptography API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859994 [Bug 1859994] Support PARSEC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862548 [Bug 1862548] Review Request: rust-ring - Safe, fast, small crypto using Rust https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862796 [Bug 1862796] Review Request: rust-parsec-interface - Parsec interface library to communicate using the wire protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878237 [Bug 1878237] Review Request: rust-picky-asn1-x509 - Provides ASN1 types defined by X.509 related RFCs -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1862798] Review Request: rust-parsec-client - Parsec Client library for the Rust ecosystem
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862798 Bug 1862798 depends on bug 1862796, which changed state. Bug 1862796 Summary: Review Request: rust-parsec-interface - Parsec interface library to communicate using the wire protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862796 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1878923] Review Request: parsec - The PARSEC daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878923 Bug 1878923 depends on bug 1862796, which changed state. Bug 1862796 Summary: Review Request: rust-parsec-interface - Parsec interface library to communicate using the wire protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862796 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1878237] Review Request: rust-picky-asn1-x509 - Provides ASN1 types defined by X.509 related RFCs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878237 Peter Robinson changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1878923 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878923 [Bug 1878923] Review Request: parsec - The PARSEC daemon -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1862796] Review Request: rust-parsec-interface - Parsec interface library to communicate using the wire protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862796 Peter Robinson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-09-14 22:43:04 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1847906] Review Request: rust-tss-esapi - Wrapper around TSS 2.0 Enhanced System API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1847906 Peter Robinson changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1878923 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878923 [Bug 1878923] Review Request: parsec - The PARSEC daemon -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1878923] New: Review Request: parsec - The PARSEC daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878923 Bug ID: 1878923 Summary: Review Request: parsec - The PARSEC daemon Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: pbrobin...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora SPEC: https://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/parsec.spec SRPM: https://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/parsec-0.4.0-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: PARSEC is the Platform AbstRaction for SECurity, an open-source initiative to provide a common API to hardware security and cryptographic services in a platform-agnostic way. This abstraction layer keeps workloads decoupled from physical platform details, enabling cloud-native delivery flows within the data center and at the edge. FAS: pbrobinson -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1878260] Review Request: rust-picky - Portable X.509, Jose and PKI implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878260 Bug 1878260 depends on bug 1878257, which changed state. Bug 1878257 Summary: Review Request: rust-aes-gcm - Rust implementation of the AES-GCM (Galois/Counter Mode) Authenticated Encryption https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878257 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1878257] Review Request: rust-aes-gcm - Rust implementation of the AES-GCM (Galois/Counter Mode) Authenticated Encryption
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878257 Peter Robinson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Last Closed||2020-09-14 22:36:56 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1857767] Review Request: python-ephem - Compute positions of the planets and stars
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1857767
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #8 from Miro Hrončok ---
Suggestions:
1) Try making the doc package noarch and see if a Koji build still succeeds.
2) Drop the unused BR on setuptools.
3) Move or remove site-packages/ephem/doc.
4) Add an upstream issue link to a comment for the deselected test.
I leave that up to you. Consider the package APPROVED otherwise.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[-]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "GNU Lesser General Public License (v3)", "Unknown or
generated".
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
use names
[Bug 1857767] Review Request: python-ephem - Compute positions of the planets and stars
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1857767 --- Comment #7 from Miro Hrončok --- > It's a file. Indeed. In that case, the setuptools BuildRequires is superfluous. > Because this test is failing. I figured that much ;) Is there an upstream report about this? (To be clear: This is not a blocker for the review.) Thanks for the update, running fedora-review again. I've noticed the following files are packaged in python3-ephem: /usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/ephem/doc /usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/ephem/doc/CHANGELOG.rst /usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/ephem/doc/angle.rst /usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/ephem/doc/catalogs.rst /usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/ephem/doc/coordinates.rst /usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/ephem/doc/date.rst /usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/ephem/doc/examples.rst /usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/ephem/doc/index.rst /usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/ephem/doc/newton.rst /usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/ephem/doc/quick.rst /usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/ephem/doc/radec.rst /usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/ephem/doc/reference.rst /usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/ephem/doc/rise-set.rst /usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/ephem/doc/tutorial.rst Are they used at runtime? If not, consider moving them to the doc package or not packaging them at all. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1875906] Review Request: python-pyiqvia - Python API for IQVIA data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875906 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-6aa9d8791d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-6aa9d8791d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1878236] Review Request: rust-picky-asn1-der - ASN.1-DER subset for serde
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878236 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-picky-asn1-der -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1857767] Review Request: python-ephem - Compute positions of the planets and stars
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1857767
--- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter ---
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #4)
> (In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #1)
> > Consider adding obsoletes/provides for python3-pyephem.
>
> Added. But the obsolete uses <=, please switch to <. <= is a tad confusing
> wrt release (and works the same in this case).
Changed
> > -k "not test_jpl.py"
> >
> > Please add a comment about why is this deselected. Consider using --ignore
> > on the file directly.
>
> Not added.
Because this test is failing.
> >
> > %{python3_sitearch}/%{pypi_name}-%{version}-py%{python3_version}.egg-info
> >
> > Consider adding trailing slash to ensure this is a directory.
>
> Not added.
It's a file.
> When you response to my feedback with a new spec file, could you please
> actually say what was changed? Otherwise I need to backtrack your changes.
> Thank you.
Sure, sorry.
%changelog
* Mon Sep 14 2020 Fabian Affolter - 3.7.7.1-3
- Ignore JPLTest and remove left-overs from tests
- Don't ship tests
Updated files:
Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-ephem.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-ephem-3.7.7.1-3.fc32.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1878908] New: Review Request: rust-bootupd - bootloader updater
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878908 Bug ID: 1878908 Summary: Review Request: rust-bootupd - bootloader updater Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: walt...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~walters/rust-bootupd.spec SRPM URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~walters/rust-bootupd-0.1.0-3.fc32.src.rpm Description: bootloader updater Fedora Account System Username: walters -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1878488] Review Request: perl-String-TtyLength - Length or width of string excluding ANSI tty codes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878488 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-String-TtyLength-0.02- ||1.fc34 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-09-14 20:47:47 --- Comment #4 from Emmanuel Seyman --- Package built for F34: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1610664 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1878903] New: Review Request: jmol - Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878903 Bug ID: 1878903 Summary: Review Request: jmol - Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: loganje...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/jmol/jmol.spec SRPM URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/jmol/jmol-14.31.4-1.fc34.src.rpm Fedora Account System Username: jjames Description: Jmol is a free, open source molecule viewer for students, educators, and researchers in chemistry and biochemistry. NOTE: The jmol package was previously in Fedora. This is a re-review due to it being absent for some months. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1878902] New: Review Request: naga - Simplified Java NIO asynchronous sockets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878902 Bug ID: 1878902 Summary: Review Request: naga - Simplified Java NIO asynchronous sockets Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: loganje...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/naga/naga.spec SRPM URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/naga/naga-3.0-15.20150330git054a930.fc34.src.rpm Fedora Account System Username: jjames Description: Naga aims to be a very small NIO library that provides a handful of java classes to wrap the usual Socket and ServerSocket with asynchronous NIO counterparts (similar to NIO2 planned for Java 1.7). All of this is driven from a single thread, making it useful for both client (e.g. allowing I/O to be done in the AWT-thread without any need for threads) and server programming (1 thread for all connections instead of 2 threads/connection). Internally Naga is a straightforward NIO implementation without any threads or event-queues thrown in, it is "just the NIO-stuff", to let you build things on top of it. Naga contains the code needed to get NIO up and running without having to code partially read buffers and setting various selection key flags. NOTE: The naga package was previously in Fedora. This is a re-review due to it being absent for some months. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1878903] Review Request: jmol - Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878903 Jerry James changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1878902 Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878902 [Bug 1878902] Review Request: naga - Simplified Java NIO asynchronous sockets -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1878902] Review Request: naga - Simplified Java NIO asynchronous sockets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878902 Jerry James changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1878903 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878903 [Bug 1878903] Review Request: jmol - Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1878236] Review Request: rust-picky-asn1-der - ASN.1-DER subset for serde
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878236
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Jared Smith ---
Package is APPROVED.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated". 41 files have unknown license. Detailed
output of licensecheck in /tmp/1878236-rust-picky-
asn1-der/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
must be documented in the spec.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in rust-
picky-asn1-der-devel , rust-picky-asn1-der+default-devel , rust-picky-
asn1-der+debug_log-devel , rust-picky-asn1-der+lazy_static-devel
[x]: Package functions as described.
[?]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
justified.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[-]: Description
[Bug 1877691] Review Request: python-cbor2 - Python CBOR (de)serializer with extensive tag support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877691 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-22b829a09d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-22b829a09d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1878898] New: Review Request: nwg-launchers - GTK-based launchers for sway and other window managers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878898 Bug ID: 1878898 Summary: Review Request: nwg-launchers - GTK-based launchers for sway and other window managers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: alebast...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/alebastr/sway-extras/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01660909-nwg-launchers/nwg-launchers.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/alebastr/sway-extras/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01660909-nwg-launchers/nwg-launchers-0.3.3-0.1.fc34.src.rpm Copr URL: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/alebastr/sway-extras/ Upstream: https://github.com/nwg-piotr/nwg-launchers Description: GTK-based launchers: application grid, button bar, menu, dmenu for sway and other window managers. Fedora Account System Username: alebastr -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1857767] Review Request: python-ephem - Compute positions of the planets and stars
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1857767 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1871595 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1871595 [Bug 1871595] F34FailsToInstall: python3-convertdate -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1878234] Review Request: rust-picky-asn1 - Provide ASN.1 simple types
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878234 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-picky-asn1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1878488] Review Request: perl-String-TtyLength - Length or width of string excluding ANSI tty codes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878488 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-String-TtyLength -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1878488] Review Request: perl-String-TtyLength - Length or width of string excluding ANSI tty codes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878488 --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman --- Thank you for the review, Jikta. I've requested a repo for this package (https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/29059) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1878134] Review Request: python-sseclient-py - SSE client for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878134 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-7e33250bb3 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-7e33250bb3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1878237] Review Request: rust-picky-asn1-x509 - Provides ASN1 types defined by X.509 related RFCs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878237 Jared Smith changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsmith.fed...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1878234] Review Request: rust-picky-asn1 - Provide ASN.1 simple types
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878234
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Jared Smith ---
Package is approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "Expat License". 10 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /tmp/1878234-rust-picky-
asn1/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
must be documented in the spec.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in rust-
picky-asn1-devel , rust-picky-asn1+default-devel , rust-picky-
asn1+chrono-devel , rust-picky-asn1+chrono_conversion-devel
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
justified.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: %check is present
[Bug 1877691] Review Request: python-cbor2 - Python CBOR (de)serializer with extensive tag support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877691 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-cbor2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1877882] Review Request: python-xiaomi-gateway - Python library to communicate with the Xiaomi Gateway
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877882 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-16f7a11578 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-16f7a11578 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1878234] Review Request: rust-picky-asn1 - Provide ASN.1 simple types
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878234 Jared Smith changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsmith.fed...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1878260] Review Request: rust-picky - Portable X.509, Jose and PKI implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878260 Peter Robinson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Last Closed||2020-09-14 17:52:25 --- Comment #1 from Peter Robinson --- While parsec had a dep on this is doesn't actually use it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1878806] Review Request: gitlint - Git commit message linter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878806 --- Comment #5 from Stephen Kitt --- (In reply to Miguel Angel Ajo from comment #4) > another question, BuildRequires: git-core > > > Shouldint this be a Requires/too?, isn't it necessary for running and not > for building? Indeed, the shell/git module is supposed to check for git so it doesn’t end up being required for all sub-commands AFAICT, but in practice that doesn’t work: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/bin/gitlint", line 5, in from gitlint.cli import cli File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/gitlint/cli.py", line 20, in from gitlint.git import GitContext, GitContextError, git_version File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/gitlint/git.py", line 4, in from gitlint import shell as sh File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/gitlint/shell.py", line 13, in from sh import git # pylint: disable=unused-import,import-error ImportError: cannot import name 'git' from 'sh' (/usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/sh.py) Fixed in the spec. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1870208] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-vips - Ruby extension for the vips image processing library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870208 --- Comment #6 from Vít Ondruch --- (In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #5) > Because this is Ruby package, we could possible use libruby.so instead. or libffi.so.6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 810049] Review Request: netbeans-ide - Netbeans Integrated Development Environment (IDE)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810049 Yaina Reddy changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yainare...@gmail.com --- Comment #185 from Yaina Reddy --- I love this post it is really good for me I got lot of information fr my new blog thanks for sharing with us. http://www.yaina.in -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1878806] Review Request: gitlint - Git commit message linter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878806 --- Comment #4 from Miguel Angel Ajo --- another question, BuildRequires: git-core Shouldint this be a Requires/too?, isn't it necessary for running and not for building? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1878806] Review Request: gitlint - Git commit message linter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878806 Stephen Kitt changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(sk...@redhat.com) | --- Comment #3 from Stephen Kitt --- (In reply to Miguel Angel Ajo from comment #2) > The linter complains about a couple of things > > [majopela@bluehat Downloads]$ rpmlint gitlint* > gitlint.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) linter -> liner, liter, inter I replaced that with “linting tool”, which is fine according to rpmlint. > gitlint.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US whitespace -> white > space, white-space, whites pace > gitlint.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mength -> length Fixed, thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1878806] Review Request: gitlint - Git commit message linter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878806 Miguel Angel Ajo changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(sk...@redhat.com) --- Comment #2 from Miguel Angel Ajo --- The linter complains about a couple of things [majopela@bluehat Downloads]$ rpmlint gitlint* gitlint.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) linter -> liner, liter, inter gitlint.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US whitespace -> white space, white-space, whites pace gitlint.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mength -> length 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. I guess the whitespace and mength can be changed, why does it complain about linter? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1878806] Review Request: gitlint - Git commit message linter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878806 Miguel Angel Ajo changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|majop...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1878806] Review Request: gitlint - Git commit message linter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878806 Miguel Angel Ajo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||majop...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Miguel Angel Ajo --- The spec looks good. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1876911] Review Request: python-sortedcollections - Python Sorted Collections
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876911 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-83bad4f093 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-83bad4f093 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-83bad4f093 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1875865] Review Request: python-aionotion - Python library for Notion Home Monitoring
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875865 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-f19e179c17 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-f19e179c17 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-f19e179c17 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1876901] Review Request: python-aiosasl - Protocol agnostic SASL Python library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876901 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-1e71ec0e4a has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-1e71ec0e4a \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-1e71ec0e4a See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1877103] Review Request: python-gios - Python wrapper for GIOS air quality data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877103 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-a0589be4a4 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-a0589be4a4 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-a0589be4a4 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1877946] Review Request: pyserial-asyncio - Asynchronous Python Serial Port Extension
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877946 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-75e2371e58 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-75e2371e58 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-75e2371e58 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1877829] Review Request: python-opnsense - Python API client for OPNsense
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877829 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-eab0f905c9 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-eab0f905c9 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-eab0f905c9 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1875865] Review Request: python-aionotion - Python library for Notion Home Monitoring
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875865 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-d3044d0488 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d3044d0488 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1876958] Review Request: python-aioiotprov - Library/utility to help provision various IoT devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876958 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-f59556a1b4 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-f59556a1b4 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-f59556a1b4 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1877742] Review Request: python-aresponses - Asyncio testing server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877742 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-7bde36b11b has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-7bde36b11b \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-7bde36b11b See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1878806] New: Review Request: gitlint - Git commit message linter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878806 Bug ID: 1878806 Summary: Review Request: gitlint - Git commit message linter Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: sk...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://sk2.org/fedora/gitlint.spec SRPM URL: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/4643/51444643/gitlint-0.13.1-1.fc34.src.rpm Description: gitlint checks git commit messages for style, using validations based on well-known community standards or on checks which have proved useful: maximum title length, trailing whitespace checks, punctuation, tabs, minimum body mength, valid email addresses... Fedora Account System Username: skitt Koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=51444643 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1876660] Review Request: flang - Flang is a Fortran language front-end designed for integration with LLVM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876660 serge_sans_paille changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-09-14 14:35:36 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1878257] Review Request: rust-aes-gcm - Rust implementation of the AES-GCM (Galois/Counter Mode) Authenticated Encryption
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878257 --- Comment #1 from Peter Robinson --- koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=51445099 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1875865] Review Request: python-aionotion - Python library for Notion Home Monitoring
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875865 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-0e7da6c1c5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-0e7da6c1c5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1876901] Review Request: python-aiosasl - Protocol agnostic SASL Python library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876901 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-8df3c49fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-8df3c49fc8 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-8df3c49fc8 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1876911] Review Request: python-sortedcollections - Python Sorted Collections
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876911 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-83bad4f093 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-83bad4f093 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1875865] Review Request: python-aionotion - Python library for Notion Home Monitoring
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875865 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-f19e179c17 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-f19e179c17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1878254] Review Request: rust-ghash - Universal hash over GF(2^128) useful for constructing a Message Authentication Code (MAC), as in the AES-GCM authenticated encryption cipher
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878254 Peter Robinson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-09-14 13:48:01 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1878257] Review Request: rust-aes-gcm - Rust implementation of the AES-GCM (Galois/Counter Mode) Authenticated Encryption
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878257 Bug 1878257 depends on bug 1878254, which changed state. Bug 1878254 Summary: Review Request: rust-ghash - Universal hash over GF(2^128) useful for constructing a Message Authentication Code (MAC), as in the AES-GCM authenticated encryption cipher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878254 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1877946] Review Request: pyserial-asyncio - Asynchronous Python Serial Port Extension
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877946 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-75e2371e58 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-75e2371e58 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1876901] Review Request: python-aiosasl - Protocol agnostic SASL Python library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876901 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2020-1f361751d5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-1f361751d5 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1877103] Review Request: python-gios - Python wrapper for GIOS air quality data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877103 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-0ca800a69e has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-0ca800a69e \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-0ca800a69e See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1876901] Review Request: python-aiosasl - Protocol agnostic SASL Python library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876901 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-882522ee4a has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-882522ee4a \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-882522ee4a See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1878254] Review Request: rust-ghash - Universal hash over GF(2^128) useful for constructing a Message Authentication Code (MAC), as in the AES-GCM authenticated encryption cipher
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878254 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-ghash -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1877811] Review Request: python-pyarlo - Python library to interact with Netgear Arlo cameras
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877811 --- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pyarlo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1878134] Review Request: python-sseclient-py - SSE client for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878134 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-sseclient-py -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1878254] Review Request: rust-ghash - Universal hash over GF(2^128) useful for constructing a Message Authentication Code (MAC), as in the AES-GCM authenticated encryption cipher
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878254
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Jared Smith ---
The summary is too long, but otherwise the package is APPROVED.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache License 2.0",
"Expat License". 8 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /tmp/1878254-rust-ghash/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
must be documented in the spec.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in rust-
ghash-devel , rust-ghash+default-devel , rust-ghash+std-devel , rust-
ghash+zeroize-devel
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
justified.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages,
[Bug 1878254] Review Request: rust-ghash - Universal hash over GF(2^128) useful for constructing a Message Authentication Code (MAC), as in the AES-GCM authenticated encryption cipher
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878254 Jared Smith changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsmith.fed...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1876901] Review Request: python-aiosasl - Protocol agnostic SASL Python library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876901 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2020-1f361751d5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-1f361751d5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1876901] Review Request: python-aiosasl - Protocol agnostic SASL Python library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876901 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-8df3c49fc8 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-8df3c49fc8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1837107] Review Request: 7kaa - Seven Kingdoms: Ancient Adversaries (claiming ownership of package)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1837107 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What|Removed |Added CC|domi...@greysector.net | Flags||needinfo?(andymenderunix@gm ||ail.com) --- Comment #38 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski --- Can you please stop adding this bug to your updates in bodhi? It should remain closed as the review is done. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1876901] Review Request: python-aiosasl - Protocol agnostic SASL Python library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876901 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-882522ee4a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-882522ee4a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1876901] Review Request: python-aiosasl - Protocol agnostic SASL Python library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876901 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-1e71ec0e4a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-1e71ec0e4a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1870208] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-vips - Ruby extension for the vips image processing library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870208 --- Comment #5 from Vít Ondruch --- (In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #2) > BTW, I'd rather see requires such as 'libvips.so.42`, but they are not > properly required [1]. And it turns out, there is way to do it according to RPM upstream [1]: ~~~ Requires: (libvips.so.42()(64bit) if libc.so.6()(64bit)) Requires: (libvips.so.42 if libc.so.6) ~~~ Because this is Ruby package, we could possible use libruby.so instead. [1]: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1344#issuecomment-681916527 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1875517] [Fedora] Add intel-ipsec-mb package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875517
Tomasz Kantecki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(tomasz.kantecki@i |
|ntel.com) |
--- Comment #3 from Tomasz Kantecki ---
Many thanks for your feedback.
The spec file has been updated based on the comments above and published at
https://github.com/intel/intel-ipsec-mb/blob/master/rpm/intel-ipsec-mb.spec
There is some overlap between %{optflags} and current CFLAGS settings but I
guess this is not a problem.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1878488] Review Request: perl-String-TtyLength - Length or width of string excluding ANSI tty codes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878488 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova --- Source file is ok Summary is ok License is ok Description is ok URL and Source0 are ok All tests passed BuildRequires are ok $ rpm -qp --requires perl-String-TtyLength-0.02-1.fc34.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c | grep -v rpmlib 1 perl(Exporter) 1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.32.0) 1 perl(parent) 1 perl(strict) 1 perl(Unicode::EastAsianWidth) >= 12.0 1 perl(:VERSION) >= 5.6.0 1 perl(warnings) Binary requires are Ok. $ rpm -qp --provides perl-String-TtyLength-0.02-1.fc34.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 perl(String::TtyLength) = 0.02 1 perl-String-TtyLength = 0.02-1.fc34 Binary provides are Ok. $ rpmlint ./perl-String-TtyLength* perl-String-TtyLength.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) tty -> try, ttys, atty perl-String-TtyLength.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US tty -> try, ttys, atty perl-String-TtyLength.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) tty -> try, ttys, atty perl-String-TtyLength.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US tty -> try, ttys, atty 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. Rpmlint is ok Resolution: Approved -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1878514] Review Request: catimg - Print images in a terminal with 256 colors support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878514 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl --- Comment #5 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- fedora-review (or rpmlint) is being obtuse here. The correct solution is to own those directories. (As you can see from the error message, about 40 other packages are doing exactly that.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1878514] Review Request: catimg - Print images in a terminal with 256 colors support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878514
--- Comment #4 from Kees de Jong ---
(In reply to Artur Frenszek-Iwicki from comment #3)
Thanks! That indeed solved it.
---
I completed my fedora-review. I think the only critical item on the list is the
one about "Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages".
That doesn't seem right. But at the other hand, if I don't explicitly own them,
I also get an error. What's the best course of action?
According to this link and examples, I did it correctly:
https://rpm-packaging-guide.github.io/#working-with-spec-files
"The %files section is where we provide the list of files that this RPM
provides and where it’s intended for them to live on the system that the RPM is
installed upon. Note here that this isn’t relative to the %{buildroot} but the
full path for the files as they are expected to exist on the end system after
installation. Therefore, the listing for the pello file we are installing will
be %{_bindir}/pello. We will also need to provide a %dir listing to define that
this package “owns” the library directory we created as well as all the files
we placed in it."
Can someone confirm?
This is a review *template*. Besides handling the [ ]-marked tests you are
also supposed to fix the template before pasting into bugzilla:
- Add issues you find to the list of issues on top. If there isn't such
a list, create one.
- Add your own remarks to the template checks.
- Add new lines marked [!] or [?] when you discover new things not
listed by fedora-review.
- Change or remove any text in the template which is plain wrong. In this
case you could also file a bug against fedora-review
- Remove the "[ ] Manual check required", you will not have any such lines
in what you paste.
- Remove attachments which you deem not really useful (the rpmlint
ones are mandatory, though)
- Remove this text
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package does not use a name that already exists.
Note: A package with this name already exists. Please check
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/catimg
See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
guidelines/Naming/#_conflicting_package_names
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "Expat License". 23 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/kjong/git/rpmbuild/1878514-catimg/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[?]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/share/zsh(creds, skim,
swaylock, pdfgrep, ninja-build, zola, ripgrep, zsh, mercurial-py3,
stratis-cli, exercism, sway, mercurial-py2, vcsh, curl, exa, xss-lock,
why3, snapd, ffsend, etckeeper, pulseaudio, fd-find, cpu-x, gpaste,
mako, git-delta, fedmod, caddy, polybar, python3-wstool, task,
wlogout, docker-compose, awscli, hyperfine, libinput, osmium-tool,
reprepro, swayidle, kde-connect), /usr/share/zsh/site-functions(creds,
skim, swaylock, pdfgrep, ninja-build, zola, ripgrep, zsh, mercurial-
py3, stratis-cli, podman, exercism, imgp, sway, mercurial-py2, vcsh,
curl, exa, xss-lock, ddgr, why3, snapd, ffsend, arch-install-scripts,
pulseaudio, fd-find, kompose, firewalld, cpu-x, gpaste, mako, git-
delta, python3-wstool, googler, caddy, polybar, task, wlogout,
lastpass-cli, docker-compose, xpanes, awscli, hyperfine, libinput,
osmium-tool, reprepro, nnn, swayidle, fzf, khard, flatpak, restic,
kde-connect, buku)
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[?]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]:
[Bug 1877103] Review Request: python-gios - Python wrapper for GIOS air quality data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877103 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-0ca800a69e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-0ca800a69e -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1878488] Review Request: perl-String-TtyLength - Length or width of string excluding ANSI tty codes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878488 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jples...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jples...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1877103] Review Request: python-gios - Python wrapper for GIOS air quality data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877103 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-a0589be4a4 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-a0589be4a4 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1877829] Review Request: python-opnsense - Python API client for OPNsense
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877829 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-eab0f905c9 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-eab0f905c9 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856163] Review Request: python-vcversioner - Use version control tags to discover version numbers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856163 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter --- Any progress here? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1878254] Review Request: rust-ghash - Universal hash over GF(2^128) useful for constructing a Message Authentication Code (MAC), as in the AES-GCM authenticated encryption cipher
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878254 --- Comment #1 from Peter Robinson --- koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=51424511 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1878254] Review Request: rust-ghash - Universal hash over GF(2^128) useful for constructing a Message Authentication Code (MAC), as in the AES-GCM authenticated encryption cipher
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878254 Bug 1878254 depends on bug 1878249, which changed state. Bug 1878249 Summary: Review Request: rust-polyval - GHASH-like universal hash over GF(2^128) useful for constructing a Message Authentication Code (MAC) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878249 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1878249] Review Request: rust-polyval - GHASH-like universal hash over GF(2^128) useful for constructing a Message Authentication Code (MAC)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878249 Peter Robinson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-09-14 07:14:51 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1877811] Review Request: python-pyarlo - Python library to interact with Netgear Arlo cameras
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877811 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter --- Thanks guys for your help. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1878134] Review Request: python-sseclient-py - SSE client for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878134 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter --- Thanks for the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1877742] Review Request: python-aresponses - Asyncio testing server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877742 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-7bde36b11b has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-7bde36b11b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1876958] Review Request: python-aioiotprov - Library/utility to help provision various IoT devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876958 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-f59556a1b4 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-f59556a1b4 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
