[Bug 1953690] Review Request: centos-packager - Tools and files necessary for building CentOS packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953690 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2021-239c87f476 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1959668] Review Request: chess_db - Chess database opening tree indexer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1959668 Ben Beasley changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|c...@musicinmybrain.net |nob...@fedoraproject.org Flags|fedora-review? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1895567] Review Request: usd - 3D VFX pipeline interchange file format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895567 Luya Tshimbalanga changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|c...@musicinmybrain.net --- Comment #27 from Luya Tshimbalanga --- You are very welcome Ben. I really appreciate your review and feedback. Note that I assigned the review to you in order to validate the importation of the package in the main branch. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process Feel free to become a co-maintainer if you like. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1955985] Review Request: rubygem-ffi-yajl - Ruby FFI wrapper around YAJL 2.x
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1955985 --- Comment #4 from Michel Alexandre Salim --- Ah, you want this: $ sudo dnf repoquery --repo rawhide --provides yajl libyajl.so.2 libyajl.so.2()(64bit) yajl = 2.1.0-16.fc34 yajl(x86-32) = 2.1.0-16.fc34 yajl(x86-64) = 2.1.0-16.fc34 Not sure what's best here. either hardcode whether you're matching agaist 64-bit or 32-bit based on %ifarch, or... just don't specify the architecture at all. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1955985] Review Request: rubygem-ffi-yajl - Ruby FFI wrapper around YAJL 2.x
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1955985 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||mic...@michel-slm.name Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mic...@michel-slm.name Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Michel Alexandre Salim --- Taking this review. Some initial issues: Issues: === - Package installs properly. Note: Installation errors (see attachment) See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ - Pure Ruby package must be built as noarch - Package contains Requires: ruby(release). - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. Note: License file MIT-LICENSE is not marked as %license See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text Installation errors --- Error: Problem: conflicting requests - nothing provides libyajl.so.2()(x86-64) needed by rubygem-ffi-yajl-2.4.0-1.fc35.x86_64 Is libyajl being reviewed? It should probably be marked as a blocker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1960022] Review Request: python-mackup - Keep your application settings in sync
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1960022 Davide Cavalca changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Davide Cavalca --- lgtm, package approved -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1960022] Review Request: python-mackup - Keep your application settings in sync
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1960022
--- Comment #2 from Davide Cavalca ---
This is a review *template*. Besides handling the [ ]-marked tests you are
also supposed to fix the template before pasting into bugzilla:
- Add issues you find to the list of issues on top. If there isn't such
a list, create one.
- Add your own remarks to the template checks.
- Add new lines marked [!] or [?] when you discover new things not
listed by fedora-review.
- Change or remove any text in the template which is plain wrong. In this
case you could also file a bug against fedora-review
- Remove the "[ ] Manual check required", you will not have any such lines
in what you paste.
- Remove attachments which you deem not really useful (the rpmlint
ones are mandatory, though)
- Remove this text
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* GNU General Public
License v3.0 or later". 551 files have unknown license. Detailed
output of licensecheck in /tmp/1960022-python-mackup/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 71680 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
[Bug 1960022] Review Request: python-mackup - Keep your application settings in sync
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1960022 Davide Cavalca changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcava...@fb.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|dcava...@fb.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Davide Cavalca --- Taking this review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1960022] Review Request: python-mackup - Keep your application settings in sync
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1960022 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What|Removed |Added Comment|0 |updated --- Comment #0 has been edited --- Spec URL: https://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/python/python-mackup.spec SRPM URL: https://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/python/python-mackup-0.8.32-1.fc34.src.rpm Description: Mackup: - Backs up your application settings in a safe directory (e.g. Dropbox) - Syncs your application settings among all your workstations - Restores your configuration on any fresh install in one command line By only tracking pure configuration files, it keeps the cruft out of your freshly new installed workstation (no cache, temporary and locally specific files are transferred). Mackup makes setting up the environment easy and simple, saving time for your family, great ideas, and all the cool stuff you like. Fedora Account System Username: salimma -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1960022] New: Review Request: python-mackup - Keep your application settings in sync
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1960022 Bug ID: 1960022 Summary: Review Request: python-mackup - Keep your application settings in sync Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mic...@michel-slm.name QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/python/python-mackup-0.8.32-1.fc34.src.rpm SRPM URL: https://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/python/python-mackup-0.8.32-1.fc34.src.rpm Description: Mackup: - Backs up your application settings in a safe directory (e.g. Dropbox) - Syncs your application settings among all your workstations - Restores your configuration on any fresh install in one command line By only tracking pure configuration files, it keeps the cruft out of your freshly new installed workstation (no cache, temporary and locally specific files are transferred). Mackup makes setting up the environment easy and simple, saving time for your family, great ideas, and all the cool stuff you like. Fedora Account System Username: salimma -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1959668] Review Request: chess_db - Chess database opening tree indexer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1959668 Ben Beasley changed: What|Removed |Added CC||c...@musicinmybrain.net Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|c...@musicinmybrain.net Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 505154] Tracker: Review Requests for Science and Technology related packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154 Susi Lehtola changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1959987 (crest) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1959987 [Bug 1959987] Review Request: crest - Conformer-Rotamer Ensemble Sampling Tool based on the xtb Semiempirical Extended Tight-Binding Program Package -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1959987] Review Request: crest - Conformer-Rotamer Ensemble Sampling Tool based on the xtb Semiempirical Extended Tight-Binding Program Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1959987 Susi Lehtola changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||505154 (FE-SCITECH) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154 [Bug 505154] Tracker: Review Requests for Science and Technology related packages -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1959987] Review Request: crest - Conformer-Rotamer Ensemble Sampling Tool based on the xtb Semiempirical Extended Tight-Binding Program Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1959987 Susi Lehtola changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||crest Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1959987] New: Review Request: crest - Conformer-Rotamer Ensemble Sampling Tool based on the xtb Semiempirical Extended Tight-Binding Program Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1959987 Bug ID: 1959987 Summary: Review Request: crest - Conformer-Rotamer Ensemble Sampling Tool based on the xtb Semiempirical Extended Tight-Binding Program Package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: susi.leht...@iki.fi QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://jussilehtola.fedorapeople.org/crest.spec SRPM URL: https://jussilehtola.fedorapeople.org/crest-2.11-1.fc34.src.rpm Fedora Account System Username: jussilehtola Description: CREST is an utility/driver program for the xtb program. Originally it was designed as conformer sampling program, hence the abbreviation Conformer-Rotamer Ensemble Sampling Tool, but now offers also some utility functions for calculations with the GFNn-xTB methods. Generally the program functions as an IO based OMP scheduler (i.e., calculations are performed by the xtb program) and tool for the creation and analysation of structure ensembles. The key procedure implemented in CREST is a conformational search workflow abbreviated as iMTD-GC. The iMTD-GC workflow generates conformer/rotamer ensembles (CREs) by extensive metadynamic sampling (MTD) based on, with an additional genetic z-matrix crossing (GC) step at the end. Other standalone functionalities that are included in CREST are parallel optimization and screening functions for GFNn–xTB, the function to sort (e.g. for NMR equivalencies) externally created ensembles, and some automated procedures for the protonation, deprotonation and tautomerization of structures. The main publication for the CREST program can be found at Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2020, 22, 7169-7192. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1922802] Review Request: golang-github-srwiley-oksvg - Partial implementation of SVG 2.0 specification in Golang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922802 --- Comment #1 from Olivier Lemasle --- Following your issue on license disambiguation (https://github.com/srwiley/oksvg/issues/23), the file doc/LICENSE has been deleted (https://github.com/srwiley/oksvg/commit/a757b9cbd4727eb25ea6a28caa028ddaae3bbe96). Please upgrade the package to its latest commit and remove this file from %golicenses. It currently causes a duplicate file (LICENSE and doc/LICENSE both installed in /usr/share/licenses/golang-github- srwiley-oksvg-devel/LICENSE) Otherwise: - Package builds in mock (when using golang-github-srwiley-rasterx - rhbz#1922803) - Conforms to Packaging guidelines - No rpmlint error -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1922802] Review Request: golang-github-srwiley-oksvg - Partial implementation of SVG 2.0 specification in Golang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922802 Olivier Lemasle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||o.lema...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|o.lema...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1922791] Review Request: golang-github-akavel-rsrc - Tool for embedding .ico & manifest resources in Go programs for Windows
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922791 Olivier Lemasle changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review- -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1922795] Review Request: golang-github-fyne-io-mobile - Fork of Go on Mobile for the Fyne project
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922795 Olivier Lemasle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Olivier Lemasle --- Package approved. - License ok - Builds in mock - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines - no rpmlint error NB: this is a fork of golang.org/x/mobile, which is already packaged: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-x-mobile Rpmlint --- Checking: golang-github-fyne-io-mobile-devel-0.1.2-1.fc35.noarch.rpm golang-github-fyne-io-mobile-0.1.2-1.fc35.src.rpm golang-github-fyne-io-mobile-devel.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US funcitonality -> functionality, functionalist golang-github-fyne-io-mobile-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/fyne-io/mobile/.goipath golang-github-fyne-io-mobile.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US funcitonality -> functionality, functionalist golang-github-fyne-io-mobile.src: W: no-%build-section 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) golang-github-fyne-io-mobile-devel.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US funcitonality -> functionality, functionalist golang-github-fyne-io-mobile-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/fyne-io/mobile/.goipath 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1959947] New: Review Request: opentype-sanitizer - Parses and serializes OpenType/WOFF/WOFF2 font files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1959947 Bug ID: 1959947 Summary: Review Request: opentype-sanitizer - Parses and serializes OpenType/WOFF/WOFF2 font files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: c...@musicinmybrain.net QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://music.fedorapeople.org/opentype-sanitizer.spec SRPM URL: https://music.fedorapeople.org/opentype-sanitizer-8.1.4-1.fc34.src.rpm Description: The OpenType Sanitizer (OTS) parses and serializes OpenType files (OTF, TTF) and WOFF and WOFF2 font files, validating them and sanitizing them as it goes. The C library is integrated into Chromium and Firefox, and also simple command line tools to check files offline in a Terminal. The CSS font-face property is great for web typography. Having to use images in order to get the correct typeface is a great sadness; one should be able to use vectors. However, on many platforms the system-level TrueType font renderers have never been part of the attack surface before, and putting them on the front line is a scary proposition... Especially on platforms like Windows, where it’s a closed-source blob running with high privilege. Fedora Account System Username: music Koji scratch builds: F35: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=67770116 F34: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=67776541 F33: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=67776561 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1922795] Review Request: golang-github-fyne-io-mobile - Fork of Go on Mobile for the Fyne project
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922795 Olivier Lemasle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||o.lema...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|o.lema...@gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1922791] Review Request: golang-github-akavel-rsrc - Tool for embedding .ico & manifest resources in Go programs for Windows
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922791 --- Comment #1 from Olivier Lemasle --- This package already exists, in the same version, and is packaged by yourself ;-) https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-akavel-rsrc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1922791] Review Request: golang-github-akavel-rsrc - Tool for embedding .ico & manifest resources in Go programs for Windows
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922791 Olivier Lemasle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||o.lema...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|o.lema...@gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1953690] Review Request: centos-packager - Tools and files necessary for building CentOS packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953690 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-6249d1cdaa has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1931141] Review Request: plocate - Much faster locate
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1931141 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl --- Comment #2 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- Updated in place with the suggested changes, and an update to latest version. As suggested, the service is not started (asynchronously) in %posttrans if enabled, so that the database is populated after installation. With the reply from mlocate maintainer [1], we have a clear plan how to proceed: plocate conflicts with mlocate. At some point in the future we can add Obsoletes. [1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/QPJ63B2CHESRRCXG7BK5L7YSVBCVBX3J/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1895567] Review Request: usd - 3D VFX pipeline interchange file format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895567
Ben Beasley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #26 from Ben Beasley ---
Package approved. Thanks for all your hard work on this difficult package.
Please see my remaining notes below.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
===
- Mixed tabs and spaces in spec file (line 174 contains a tab); please fix this
when importing.
- The currently-disabled -docs subpackage has some issues:
- Description has typo “Documenation”
- Should really conditionalize the whole %package docs and not just
%files docs
- The -docs subpackage should be BuildArch: noarch
- The suffix -doc, rather than -docs, would be more conventional for this
subpackage.
- If you set “%global __cmake_in_source_build” in the spec file, then
enabling the documentation seems to work. I didn’t take time to verify that
Doxygen actually found all the things it should be documenting, and by
default the documentation is installed in the wrong path
(/usr/docs/doxy_{html,xml} instead of %{_pkgdocdir}).
I think getting the documentation building and installing properly would be
great, but it doesn‘t have to block approval.
Non-Issues from fedora-review:
==
- Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: usd : /usr/share/usd/examples/include/pxr/imaging/hdTiny/mesh.h usd
: /usr/share/usd/examples/include/pxr/imaging/hdTiny/renderDelegate.h usd
: /usr/share/usd/examples/include/pxr/imaging/hdTiny/renderPass.h usd :
/usr/share/usd/examples/include/pxr/imaging/hdTiny/rendererPlugin.h
See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
guidelines/#_devel_packages
This is spurious feedback from fedora-review; these are documentation. If you
ever manage to build the documentation, you will need a -doc subpackage, and
they should go in that. For now, they are fine where they are.
- Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
This is from fedora-review; it does not like pkgconfig(python3), but that is
acceptable.
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: ldconfig not called in %post and %postun for Fedora 28 and later.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "Khronos License Expat License Apache
License 2.0", "Apache License 2.0", "Expat License", "BSD 3-clause
"New" or "Revised" License", "Apache License 2.0 [generated file]",
"Khronos License", "Apache License 2.0 GNU General Public License v3.0
or later", "BSD 2-clause "Simplified" License", "the Unlicense Expat
License", "*No copyright* Apache License 2.0". 2567 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/reviewer/1895567-usd/20210511/1895567-usd/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
must be documented in the spec.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[-]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
Package is correctly ExclusiveArch.
[Bug 1948661] Review Request: perl-YAML-PP-LibYAML - Faster parsing for YAML::PP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948661 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-YAML-PP-LibYAML-0.005- ||1.fc35 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2021-05-12 12:06:25 --- Comment #5 from Jitka Plesnikova --- Thank you for the review and the repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1959785] New: Review Request: applet-window-buttons - Plasma 5 applet to show window buttons in panels
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1959785
Bug ID: 1959785
Summary: Review Request: applet-window-buttons - Plasma 5
applet to show window buttons in panels
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
Reporter: thunderbir...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL:
https://pagure.io/Maukit-Packages/blob/main/f/applet-window-buttons/applet-window-buttons.spec
SRPM URL:
https://pagure.io/Maukit-Packages/blob/main/f/applet-window-buttons/applet-window-buttons-0.9.0-1.fc34.src.rpm
Copr Repo :
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/thunderbirdtr/MauiKit-packages/
Last copr build result :
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/thunderbirdtr/MauiKit-packages/build/2182489/
Description: Plasma 5 applet to show window buttons in panels
Fedora Account System Username: thunderbirdtr
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
Note: No gcc, gcc-c++ or clang found in BuildRequires
See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/C_and_C++/
- Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or desktop-
file-validate if there is such a file.
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[ ]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[ ]: Package contains no static executables.
[ ]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[ ]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
Note: Using prebuilt packages
[ ]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[ ]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU General Public License, Version
2", "GNU Lesser General Public License, Version 2.1", "GNU General
Public License v2.0 or later". 11 files have unknown license. Detailed
output of licensecheck in /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/applet-
window-buttons/licensecheck.txt
[ ]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[ ]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[ ]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[ ]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[ ]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[ ]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[ ]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[ ]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[ ]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[ ]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[ ]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[ ]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[ ]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[ ]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[ ]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[ ]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[ ]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[Bug 1959780] New: Review Request: rust-cranelift-codegen-shared - For code shared between cranelift-codegen-meta and cranelift-codegen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1959780 Bug ID: 1959780 Summary: Review Request: rust-cranelift-codegen-shared - For code shared between cranelift-codegen-meta and cranelift-codegen Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: o.lema...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://olem.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rust-cranelift-codegen-shared.spec SRPM URL: https://olem.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rust-cranelift-codegen-shared-0.73.0-1.fc34.src.rpm Description: For code shared between cranelift-codegen-meta and cranelift-codegen. Fedora Account System Username: olem -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1919718] Review Request: python-filecheck - Flexible pattern matching file verifier
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919718 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2021-05-12 10:16:32 --- Comment #6 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski --- Sorry for not closing earlier. I missed this due to POST status. Built and released for F33+. Thanks for the review! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1898470] [Unretirement] Review Request: nodejs-object-assign - ES6 Object.assign() ponyfill
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1898470 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Flags|fedora-review+ | Last Closed||2021-05-12 10:14:19 --- Comment #2 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski --- I decided not to maintain this due to lack of time. Thanks for the review, though. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1959754] Review Request: rust-cranelift-entity - Data structures using entity references as mapping keys
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1959754 --- Comment #1 from Olivier Lemasle --- This package built on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=67751908 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1959754] New: Review Request: rust-cranelift-entity - Data structures using entity references as mapping keys
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1959754 Bug ID: 1959754 Summary: Review Request: rust-cranelift-entity - Data structures using entity references as mapping keys Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: o.lema...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://olem.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rust-cranelift-entity.spec SRPM URL: https://olem.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rust-cranelift-entity-0.73.0-1.fc34.src.rpm Description: Data structures using entity references as mapping keys. Fedora Account System Username: olem -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1901097] Review Request: rust-wat - Rust parser for the WebAssembly Text format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901097 Olivier Lemasle changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review+ | --- Comment #2 from Olivier Lemasle --- Could you please re-approve this package now that its dependency rust-wast is packaged? I've also updated the package: Spec URL: https://olem.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rust-wat.spec SRPM URL: https://olem.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rust-wat-1.0.37-1.fc34.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1958914] Review Request: python-PuLP - A python Linear Programming API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1958914 --- Comment #3 from Aniket Pradhan --- Thanks for the review @iztok. :D Will do the changes before importing the repo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1958914] Review Request: python-PuLP - A python Linear Programming API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1958914 Iztok Fister Jr. changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1958914] Review Request: python-PuLP - A python Linear Programming API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1958914
--- Comment #2 from Iztok Fister Jr. ---
Hi Aniket,
package looks great.
TODOs:
- Install also examples/ in doc.
- Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see attached
diff).
Please fix these issues/comments before import.
PACKAGE APPROVED!
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "Expat License". 57 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/iztok/rpmbuild/reviews/1958914-python-pulp/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for
[Bug 1958338] Review Request: rust-num_enum_derive - Internal implementation details for ::num_enum (Procedural macros to make inter-operation between primitives and enums easier)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1958338 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-efb45c264a has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-efb45c264a \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-efb45c264a See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1958352] Review Request: rust-libbpf-rs - Safe, idiomatic, and opinionated wrapper around libbpf-sys
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1958352 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-efb45c264a has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-efb45c264a \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-efb45c264a See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1958348] Review Request: rust-num_enum - Procedural macros to make inter-operation between primitives and enums easier
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1958348 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-efb45c264a has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-efb45c264a \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-efb45c264a See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1958333] Review Request: rust-vsprintf - Rust bindings to the libc vsprintf function
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1958333 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-efb45c264a has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-efb45c264a \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-efb45c264a See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1958330] Review Request: rust-libbpf-sys - Rust bindings to libbpf from the Linux kernel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1958330 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-efb45c264a has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-efb45c264a \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-efb45c264a See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1958366] Review Request: rust-ncurses - Very thin wrapper around the ncurses TUI library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1958366 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-bd36aef3ee has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-bd36aef3ee \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-bd36aef3ee See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1958602] Review Request: rust-k9 - Rust testing library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1958602 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-d33ef661ce has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-d33ef661ce \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-d33ef661ce See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1958681] Review Request: rust-xi-unicode - Unicode utilities useful for text editing, including a line breaking iterator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1958681 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-53e81bf374 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-53e81bf374 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-53e81bf374 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1958895] Review Request: python-socks - Core proxy (SOCKS4, SOCKS5, HTTP tunneling) functionality for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1958895 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-d07dc64d18 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-d07dc64d18 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-d07dc64d18 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1957911] Review Request: rust-ioctl-rs - Rust bindings for system ioctls
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1957911 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-7e6629f475 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-7e6629f475 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-7e6629f475 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1957907] Review Request: rust-serial-core - Rust abstractions for serial ports
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1957907 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-af75b8003a has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-af75b8003a \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-af75b8003a See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1952688] Review Request: rust-convert_case - Convert strings into any case
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1952688 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-a1e7925a0f has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-a1e7925a0f` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-a1e7925a0f See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1952403] Review Request: php-bjeavons-zxcvbn-php - Realistic password strength estimation PHP library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1952403 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-4aca9c19b5 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-4aca9c19b5 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-4aca9c19b5 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1958681] Review Request: rust-xi-unicode - Unicode utilities useful for text editing, including a line breaking iterator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1958681 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-b05cc0aefd has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-b05cc0aefd \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-b05cc0aefd See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1958895] Review Request: python-socks - Core proxy (SOCKS4, SOCKS5, HTTP tunneling) functionality for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1958895 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-b70cc246ad has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-b70cc246ad \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-b70cc246ad See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
