date:20210709

[Bug 1971414] Review Request: rust-matrixcompare - Tools for convenient comparison of matrices

2021-07-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1971414

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2021-005461f305 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2021-005461f305 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-005461f305

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1971442] Review Request: rust-obj - A package for loading Wavefront .obj files

2021-07-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1971442

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2021-e40f502d58 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2021-e40f502d58 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-e40f502d58

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1980117] Review Request: picocli - Java command line parser with both an annotations API and a programmatic API

2021-07-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980117



--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2021-80709d684d has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2021-80709d684d \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-80709d684d

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1979102] Review Request: xstdcmap - Utility to define standard colormap properties

2021-07-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1979102

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2021-da255c6a38 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2021-da255c6a38`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-da255c6a38

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1974597] Review Request: vim-ale - Asynchronous Vim Lint Engine

2021-07-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974597

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2021-aee16d216a has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2021-aee16d216a`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-aee16d216a

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1978942] Review Request: python-ijson – Iterative JSON parser

2021-07-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1978942

Dan Callaghan  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Dan Callaghan  ---
Would it be worth adding a Requires: or Recommends: on python3-yajl? Presumably
the yajl backend is supposed to be faster than the pure Python one which is
what users will get if they don't install yajl.

Apart from that, no issues found during review, this package is APPROVED.


Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated


= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 30720 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
 process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
 provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
 packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
 versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
 use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
 publishes signatures.
 Note: gpgverify is not used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]:

[Bug 1978942] Review Request: python-ijson – Iterative JSON parser

2021-07-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1978942

Dan Callaghan  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||d...@djc.id.au
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|d...@djc.id.au
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1977535] Review Request: python-howdoi - Instant coding answers via the command line

2021-07-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1977535



--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2021-84a5d956c1 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1977534] Review Request: python-keep - A Meta CLI toolkit

2021-07-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1977534



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2021-84a5d956c1 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1980117] Review Request: picocli - Java command line parser with both an annotations API and a programmatic API

2021-07-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980117

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2021-9cbdf12569 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2021-9cbdf12569 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-9cbdf12569

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1977535] Review Request: python-howdoi - Instant coding answers via the command line

2021-07-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1977535

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2021-07-10 00:48:48



--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2021-535d01eecb has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1977534] Review Request: python-keep - A Meta CLI toolkit

2021-07-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1977534

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2021-07-10 00:48:46



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2021-535d01eecb has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1977535] Review Request: python-howdoi - Instant coding answers via the command line

2021-07-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1977535
Bug 1977535 depends on bug 1977534, which changed state.

Bug 1977534 Summary: Review Request: python-keep - A Meta CLI toolkit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1977534

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1979102] Review Request: xstdcmap - Utility to define standard colormap properties

2021-07-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1979102

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2021-da255c6a38 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-da255c6a38


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1980850] Review Request: rust-argh_shared - Derive-based argument parsing optimized for code size

2021-07-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980850

Neal Gompa  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ngomp...@gmail.com
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Neal Gompa  ---
Package was generated through rust2rpm, simplifying the review considerably.

- Conforms to packaging guidelines (rust2rpm generated spec)
- license correct and valid
- only sources installed

PACKAGE APPROVED.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1980851] Review Request: rust-argh_derive - Derive-based argument parsing optimized for code size

2021-07-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980851

Neal Gompa  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ngomp...@gmail.com
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Neal Gompa  ---
Package was generated through rust2rpm, simplifying the review considerably.

- Conforms to packaging guidelines (rust2rpm generated spec)
- license correct and valid
- only sources installed

PACKAGE APPROVED.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1980864] Review Request: rust-argh - Derive-based argument parser optimized for code size

2021-07-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980864

Neal Gompa  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ngomp...@gmail.com
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Neal Gompa  ---
Package was generated through rust2rpm, simplifying the review considerably.

- Conforms to packaging guidelines (rust2rpm generated spec)
- license correct and valid
- only sources installed

PACKAGE APPROVED.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1980860] Review Request: rust-unicode-truncate - Unicode-aware algorithm to pad or truncate `str` in terms of displayed width

2021-07-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980860

Neal Gompa  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ngomp...@gmail.com
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Neal Gompa  ---
Package was generated through rust2rpm, simplifying the review considerably.

- Conforms to packaging guidelines (rust2rpm generated spec)
- license correct and valid
- only sources installed

PACKAGE APPROVED.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1980864] New: Review Request: rust-argh - Derive-based argument parser optimized for code size

2021-07-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980864

Bug ID: 1980864
   Summary: Review Request: rust-argh - Derive-based argument
parser optimized for code size
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: igor.ra...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-argh.spec
SRPM URL:
https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-argh-0.1.5-1.fc35.src.rpm
Description:
Derive-based argument parser optimized for code size.
Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1980860] New: Review Request: rust-unicode-truncate - Unicode-aware algorithm to pad or truncate `str` in terms of displayed width

2021-07-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980860

Bug ID: 1980860
   Summary: Review Request: rust-unicode-truncate - Unicode-aware
algorithm to pad or truncate `str` in terms of
displayed width
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: igor.ra...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL:
https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-unicode-truncate.spec
SRPM URL:
https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-unicode-truncate-0.2.0-1.fc35.src.rpm
Description:
Unicode-aware algorithm to pad or truncate `str` in terms of displayed width.
Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1980850] New: Review Request: rust-argh_shared - Derive-based argument parsing optimized for code size

2021-07-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980850

Bug ID: 1980850
   Summary: Review Request: rust-argh_shared - Derive-based
argument parsing optimized for code size
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: igor.ra...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL:
https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-argh_shared.spec
SRPM URL:
https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-argh_shared-0.1.5-1.fc35.src.rpm
Description:
Derive-based argument parsing optimized for code size.
Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1980851] New: Review Request: rust-argh_derive - Derive-based argument parsing optimized for code size

2021-07-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980851

Bug ID: 1980851
   Summary: Review Request: rust-argh_derive - Derive-based
argument parsing optimized for code size
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: igor.ra...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL:
https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-argh_derive.spec
SRPM URL:
https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-argh_derive-0.1.5-1.fc35.src.rpm
Description:
Derive-based argument parsing optimized for code size.
Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1980776] Review Request: ghc-th-compat - Backward- (and forward-)compatible Quote and Code types

2021-07-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980776



--- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen  ---
The library will be needed by both ghc-th-orphans and ghc-optparse-simple in
F35.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1979316] Review Request: python-lsp-black - A python-lsp-server plugin that adds support to black autoformatter

2021-07-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1979316
Bug 1979316 depends on bug 1979315, which changed state.

Bug 1979315 Summary: Review Request: python-lsp-server - Python implementation 
of language server protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1979315

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1979315] Review Request: python-lsp-server - Python implementation of language server protocol

2021-07-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1979315

Mukundan Ragavan  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2021-07-09 15:23:45



--- Comment #10 from Mukundan Ragavan  ---
built on rawhide.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1980117] Review Request: picocli - Java command line parser with both an annotations API and a programmatic API

2021-07-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980117



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2021-9cbdf12569 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-9cbdf12569


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1980117] Review Request: picocli - Java command line parser with both an annotations API and a programmatic API

2021-07-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980117

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|MODIFIED



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2021-80709d684d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-80709d684d


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1970460] Review Request: perl-GooCanvas2-CairoTypes - Bridge between GooCanvas2 and Cairo types

2021-07-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1970460



--- Comment #9 from MartinKG  ---
New package:

Spec URL:
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/perl-GooCanvas2-CairoTypes.spec
SRPM URL:
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/perl-GooCanvas2-CairoTypes-0.001-5.fc34.src.rpm

%changelog
* Fri Jul 09 2021 Martin Gansser  - 0.001-5
- Remove the parenthesis from the License value
- Remove Provides it's is created automatically
- Do not create a devel subpackage


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1980776] New: Review Request: ghc-th-compat - Backward- (and forward-)compatible Quote and Code types

2021-07-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980776

Bug ID: 1980776
   Summary: Review Request: ghc-th-compat - Backward- (and
forward-)compatible Quote and Code types
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: peter...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL:
https://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-th-compat/ghc-th-compat.spec
SRPM URL:
https://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-th-compat/ghc-th-compat-0.1.2-1.fc34.src.rpm

Description:
This package defines a "Language.Haskell.TH.Syntax.Compat" module, which
backports the 'Quote' and 'Code' types to work across a wide range of
'template-haskell' versions. On recent versions of 'template-haskell' (2.17.0.0
or later), this module simply reexports 'Quote' and 'Code' from
"Language.Haskell.TH.Syntax". Refer to the Haddocks for
"Language.Haskell.TH.Syntax.Compat" for examples of how to use this module.


Koji scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=71590271


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1970460] Review Request: perl-GooCanvas2-CairoTypes - Bridge between GooCanvas2 and Cairo types

2021-07-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1970460



--- Comment #8 from Petr Pisar  ---
TODO: You can remove the parenthesis from the License value.
TODO: Do not provide "%{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}" explicitly. It's
is created automatically.

The package builds in F35
(https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=71589206). Ok.

$ rpmlint perl-GooCanvas2-CairoTypes.spec
../SRPMS/perl-GooCanvas2-CairoTypes-0.001-4.fc35.src.rpm
../RPMS/x86_64/perl-GooCanvas2-CairoTypes-*
== rpmlint session
starts =
rpmlint: 2.0.0
configuration:
/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/licenses.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 31, packages: 6

perl-GooCanvas2-CairoTypes-debuginfo.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/GooCanvas2/CairoTypes/CairoTypes.so-0.001-4.fc35.x86_64.debug
perl-GooCanvas2-CairoTypes-debuginfo.x86_64: E:
shared-library-without-dependency-information
/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/GooCanvas2/CairoTypes/CairoTypes.so-0.001-4.fc35.x86_64.debug
perl-GooCanvas2-CairoTypes-debuginfo.x86_64: W: no-documentation
perl-GooCanvas2-CairoTypes-debugsource.x86_64: W: no-documentation
perl-GooCanvas2-CairoTypes-debuginfo.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/b7/b279c41dc887a2504a92be0e309ee258a3edb2
../../../.build-id/b7/b279c41dc887a2504a92be0e309ee258a3edb2
=== 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4
warnings, 1 badness; has taken 0.9 s ==
rpmlint is Ok.

$ rpm -q -lv -p
../RPMS/x86_64/perl-GooCanvas2-CairoTypes-0.001-4.fc35.x86_64.rpm 
drwxr-xr-x2 root root0 Jul  9 15:42
/usr/lib/.build-id
drwxr-xr-x2 root root0 Jul  9 15:42
/usr/lib/.build-id/b7
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root   80 Jul  9 15:42
/usr/lib/.build-id/b7/b279c41dc887a2504a92be0e309ee258a3edb2 ->
../../../../usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/GooCanvas2/CairoTypes/CairoTypes.so
drwxr-xr-x2 root root0 Jul  9 15:42
/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/GooCanvas2
-rw-r--r--1 root root 1930 Feb 19 01:34
/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/GooCanvas2/CairoTypes.pm
drwxr-xr-x2 root root0 Jul  9 15:42
/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/GooCanvas2
drwxr-xr-x2 root root0 Jul  9 15:42
/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/GooCanvas2/CairoTypes
-rwxr-xr-x1 root root15232 Jul  9 15:42
/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/GooCanvas2/CairoTypes/CairoTypes.so
drwxr-xr-x2 root root0 Jul  9 15:42
/usr/share/doc/perl-GooCanvas2-CairoTypes
-rw-r--r--1 root root   85 Feb 19 01:34
/usr/share/doc/perl-GooCanvas2-CairoTypes/Changes
-rw-r--r--1 root root 1966 Feb 19 01:34
/usr/share/doc/perl-GooCanvas2-CairoTypes/README
drwxr-xr-x2 root root0 Jul  9 15:42
/usr/share/licenses/perl-GooCanvas2-CairoTypes
-rw-r--r--1 root root18331 Feb 19 01:34
/usr/share/licenses/perl-GooCanvas2-CairoTypes/LICENSE
-rw-r--r--1 root root 2052 Jul  9 15:42
/usr/share/man/man3/GooCanvas2::CairoTypes.3pm.gz

$ rpm -q -lv -p
../RPMS/x86_64/perl-GooCanvas2-CairoTypes-devel-0.001-4.fc35.x86_64.rpm 
-rw-r--r--1 root root 1930 Feb 19 01:34
/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/GooCanvas2/CairoTypes.pm
-rw-r--r--1 root root 2052 Jul  9 15:42
/usr/share/man/man3/GooCanvas2::CairoTypes.3pm.gz

FIX: The devel subpackage is a subset of the main package. Please do not create
the devel subpackage. It has no meaning.

$ resolvedeps f35-build
../RPMS/x86_64/perl-GooCanvas2-CairoTypes{,-devel}-0.001-4.fc35.x86_64.rpm 
Binary dependencies are resolvable. Ok.

Otherwise the package is in line with Fedora and Perl packaging guidelines.
Please correct the 'FIX' item, consider fixing the 'TODO' items, and provide a
new spec file.
Resolution: Package NOT approved.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:

[Bug 1980342] Review Request: libxcvt - VESA CVT standard timing modelines generator

2021-07-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980342



--- Comment #7 from Olivier Fourdan  ---
Thanks!

(In reply to Yanko Kaneti from comment #5)
> Instead of "libxcvt-cvt"  I would name the subpackage with the binary just
> "cvt"

Done.

(In reply to Yanko Kaneti from comment #6)
> Oh and own 
> %dir %{_includedir}/libxcvt

Done.

spec and srpm updated.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1980723] Review Request: fluent-bit - Fast data collector for Linux

2021-07-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980723

Neal Gompa  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ngomp...@gmail.com
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
  Flags||fedora-review?



--- Comment #1 from Neal Gompa  ---
Taking this review.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1980723] New: Review Request: fluent-bit - Fast data collector for Linux

2021-07-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980723

Bug ID: 1980723
   Summary: Review Request: fluent-bit - Fast data collector for
Linux
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: bkirc...@0xadd.de
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/bkircher/fluent-bit/fedora-34-x86_64/02316824-fluent-bit/fluent-bit.spec
SRPM URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/bkircher/fluent-bit/fedora-34-x86_64/02316824-fluent-bit/fluent-bit-1.7.9-1.fc34.src.rpm
Description: Fluent Bit is a high performance and multi-platform log forwarder.
Fedora Account System Username: bkircher


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1980342] Review Request: libxcvt - VESA CVT standard timing modelines generator

2021-07-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980342



--- Comment #6 from Yanko Kaneti  ---
Oh and own 
%dir %{_includedir}/libxcvt


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1666545] Review Request: python-qdarkstyle - A dark stylesheet for Qt applications

2021-07-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666545

Jonny Heggheim  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Last Closed||2021-07-09 11:28:30



--- Comment #8 from Jonny Heggheim  ---


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1785982 ***


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1785982] Review Request: python-qdarkstyle - A dark stylesheet for Python and Qt applications

2021-07-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1785982

Jonny Heggheim  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1666513
 CC||heg...@gmail.com



--- Comment #8 from Jonny Heggheim  ---
*** Bug 1666545 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***



Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666513
[Bug 1666513] nothing provides python3.6dist(qdarkstyle) < 3.0 needed by
electrum-3.2.4-1.fc28.noarch
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1980342] Review Request: libxcvt - VESA CVT standard timing modelines generator

2021-07-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980342

Yanko Kaneti  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|yan...@declera.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #5 from Yanko Kaneti  ---
Name matches and doesn't conflict
License matches.
Builds in mock. Seems to work.

APPROVED

Instead of "libxcvt-cvt"  I would name the subpackage with the binary just
"cvt"


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1970460] Review Request: perl-GooCanvas2-CairoTypes - Bridge between GooCanvas2 and Cairo types

2021-07-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1970460



--- Comment #7 from MartinKG  ---
Thanks for the review.

Spec URL:
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/perl-GooCanvas2-CairoTypes.spec
SRPM URL:
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/perl-GooCanvas2-CairoTypes-0.001-4.fc34.src.rpm

%changelog
* Fri Jul 09 2021 Martin Gansser  - 0.001-4
- Dropped %%filter_provides_in macro
- Fixed %%description must be sentence
- Fixed license value to "GPL+ or Artistic"
- Include unpacked directory %%dir %%{perl_vendorarch}/auto/
- Do not do "%exclude %%{perl_vendorarch}/perllocal.pod
  That's achieved with "Makefile.PL NO_PERLLOCAL=1"
- Include %%{_mandir}/man3/GooCanvas2::CairoTypes.3pm.gz file
  in devel subpackage
- Remove BR perl-macros
- Add BR perl(strict)
- Add BR perl(warnigs)
- Add BR perl(File::Spec)
- Remove BR perl(lib)
- Corrected Requires to %%{name}%%{?_isa}


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1980282] Review Request: exaile - music player

2021-07-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980282

Graham White  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||needinfo?(zebo...@gmail.com
   ||)



--- Comment #6 from Graham White  ---
Thanks for taking the time to do the review and all your extra detail, that was
all extremely helpful.

I have updated the spec file and built a new set of RPMS, all uploaded to
https://grahamwhiteuk.fedorapeople.org/pkgreviews/exaile/

I have also submitted 3 patches upstream:
1) https://github.com/exaile/exaile/pull/759 - Preserve timestamp upon file
installation.
2) https://github.com/exaile/exaile/pull/760 - Use the correct address for the
FSF
3) https://github.com/exaile/exaile/pull/761 - Remove shebangs from plugins
installed without execute perms

Changes made are:

* Set Fedora default build flags
 - added %set_build_flags to the %build section

* Keep timestamps and defer byte compilation to brp-python-bytecompile
 - spec file modifies the Makefile to add -p flag to install command (this
aspect will be remove if PR 759 is accepted upstream)
 - spec file modifies the Makefile to remove the compilation step

* Re-enabled tests, I've no idea why this was disabled by the previous
packagers
 - patch d8bbcfd174b658babb6605799d1e9e788b578c84 incorporated to facilitate
successful tests until next upstream release (where the patch has been merged
upstream)

* Updated BuildRequires
 - as indicated in the above package review and to include additional BRs to
allow the tests to execute

* Correct rpmlint issues
 - patch submitted upstream to use the correct FSF address
 - patch submitted upstream to remove unnecessary shebangs

@zebo...@gmail.com - I wonder if you would be kind enough to double check with
an updated review?

Thanks again.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1978515] Review Request: dropwatch - monitor for dropped network packets in the kernel

2021-07-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1978515



--- Comment #22 from Artur Frenszek-Iwicki  ---
Since this a re-review for unretiring a package, instead of a new package
submission, the next step is to file a ticket with releng.
https://pagure.io/releng/new_issue?template=package_unretirement=Unretire%20dropwatch


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1978515] Review Request: dropwatch - monitor for dropped network packets in the kernel

2021-07-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1978515



--- Comment #21 from Hangbin Liu  ---
(In reply to Mikel Olasagasti Uranga from comment #20)
> Thanks for fixing those Hangbin. 
> 
> Adding fedora-review+

Thanks Mikel for the review. Is there anything else I should do for the next
step?


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1977987] Review Request: anarch - minimalist first person shooter

2021-07-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1977987



--- Comment #6 from Artur Frenszek-Iwicki  ---
Yep, looks like the original SRPM got corrupted during upload. Sorry for that.

Here's a new build that fixes issues with ownership of /usr/share/icons/...
directories, and also adds a patch to store the game's savefile in
$XDG_DATA_HOME instead of $PWD.

spec: https://svgames.pl/fedora/anarch-1.02d-2.20210616gitf6a6a68a/anarch.spec
srpm:
https://svgames.pl/fedora/anarch-1.02d-2.20210616gitf6a6a68a/anarch-1.02d-2.20210616gitf6a6a68a.fc34.src.rpm
koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=71576566


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1974597] Review Request: vim-ale - Asynchronous Vim Lint Engine

2021-07-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974597

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|MODIFIED



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2021-aee16d216a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-aee16d216a


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1980342] Review Request: libxcvt - VESA CVT standard timing modelines generator

2021-07-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980342



--- Comment #4 from Olivier Fourdan  ---
spec/srpm updated to add a "Conflicts: xorg-x11-server-Xorg < 1.21" for the
package libxcvt-cvt


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1980342] Review Request: libxcvt - VESA CVT standard timing modelines generator

2021-07-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980342



--- Comment #3 from Olivier Fourdan  ---
So I was trying to avoid adding an explicit conflict, but considering that the
use of libxcvt will not be backported to the stable branch of the xserver
(1.20.xx) we could just make libxcvt-cvt conflicts with xorg-x11-server-Xorg <=
1.20.

Would that be acceptable in ths context?


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1970460] Review Request: perl-GooCanvas2-CairoTypes - Bridge between GooCanvas2 and Cairo types

2021-07-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1970460



--- Comment #6 from Petr Pisar  ---
URL and Source0 addresses are Ok.
Source0 archive (SHA-512:
00478eda62bfb80393635e0c5eaa86cf43646e74df1ec61f9fac58f4792e8deabeede3f6dbfbaf8844c850f3ca729f3f27090449670f9eeeafcf2ec3ccd316c0)
is original. Ok.

FIX: Do not use obsolete %filter_provides_in macro. You can use
%__provides_exclude_from
.
But it should not be necessary because these provides are not generated.

Summary verified from lib/GooCanvas2/CairoTypes.pm. Ok.

FIX: %description must be sentence. And it should provide better explanation
than Summary.
I recommend DESCRIPTION text found in lib/GooCanvas2/CairoTypes.pm POD.

FIX: The License value is wrong. E.g. lib/GooCanvas2/CairoTypes.pm file is
"GPL+ or Artistic":
  This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
  it under the same terms as Perl itself, either Perl version 5.22.3 or,
  at your option, any later version of Perl 5 you may have available.
A similar declaration can be found in README and LICENSE files.

FIX: There is no point in "%exclude %dir %{perl_vendorarch}/auto/". The
directory is not packaged.
FIX: Do not do "%exclude %{perl_vendorarch}/perllocal.pod". That's achieved
with "Makefile.PL NO_PERLLOCAL=1".
FIX: Package the excluded %{_mandir}/man3/GooCanvas2::CairoTypes.3pm.gz file in
devel subpackage.
FIX: Remove "BuildRequires:  perl-macros". You do not call any macro from that
package.

FIX: Build-require 'perl(strict)' (Makefile.PL:5).
FIX: Build-require 'perl(warnigs)' (Makefile.PL:6).

'perl(Gtk3)' is not used at tests. Ok.
'perl(XSLoader)' is not used at tests. Ok.

FIX: Build-require 'perl(File::Spec)' (t/00-report-prereqs.t:11).

FIX: Do not require "perl(lib)". It's nowhere used.

All tests pass. Ok.

perl-GooCanvas2-CairoTypes-debuginfo.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/GooCanvas2/CairoTypes/CairoTypes.so-0.001-3.fc35.x86_64.debug
perl-GooCanvas2-CairoTypes-debuginfo.x86_64: E:
shared-library-without-dependency-information
/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/GooCanvas2/CairoTypes/CairoTypes.so-0.001-3.fc35.x86_64.debug
perl-GooCanvas2-CairoTypes-debuginfo.x86_64: W: no-documentation
perl-GooCanvas2-CairoTypes-debugsource.x86_64: W: no-documentation
perl-GooCanvas2-CairoTypes-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
perl-GooCanvas2-CairoTypes-debuginfo.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/be/6a8c99cf7b9315acc3137a17e6d5881bf66324
../../../.build-id/be/6a8c99cf7b9315acc3137a17e6d5881bf66324
=== 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5
warnings, 1 badness; has taken 1.1 s ==
rpmlint is Ok.

The package builds in F35
(https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=71570148). Ok.

$ rpm -q -lv -p
../RPMS/x86_64/perl-GooCanvas2-CairoTypes-0.001-3.fc35.x86_64.rpm 
drwxr-xr-x2 root root0 Jul  9 09:13
/usr/lib/.build-id
drwxr-xr-x2 root root0 Jul  9 09:13
/usr/lib/.build-id/be
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root   80 Jul  9 09:13
/usr/lib/.build-id/be/6a8c99cf7b9315acc3137a17e6d5881bf66324 ->
../../../../usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/GooCanvas2/CairoTypes/CairoTypes.so
drwxr-xr-x2 root root0 Jul  9 09:13
/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/GooCanvas2
-rw-r--r--1 root root 1930 Feb 19 01:34
/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/GooCanvas2/CairoTypes.pm
drwxr-xr-x2 root root0 Jul  9 09:13
/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/GooCanvas2
drwxr-xr-x2 root root0 Jul  9 09:13
/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/GooCanvas2/CairoTypes
-rwxr-xr-x1 root root15232 Jul  9 09:13
/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/GooCanvas2/CairoTypes/CairoTypes.so
drwxr-xr-x2 root root0 Jul  9 09:13
/usr/share/doc/perl-GooCanvas2-CairoTypes
-rw-r--r--1 root root   85 Feb 19 01:34
/usr/share/doc/perl-GooCanvas2-CairoTypes/Changes
-rw-r--r--1 root root 1966 Feb 19 01:34
/usr/share/doc/perl-GooCanvas2-CairoTypes/README
drwxr-xr-x2 root root0 Jul  9 09:13
/usr/share/licenses/perl-GooCanvas2-CairoTypes
-rw-r--r--1 root root18331 Feb 19 01:34
/usr/share/licenses/perl-GooCanvas2-CairoTypes/LICENSE

$ rpm -q -lv -p
../RPMS/x86_64/perl-GooCanvas2-CairoTypes-devel-0.001-3.fc35.x86_64.rpm 
-rw-r--r--1 root root 1930 Feb 19 01:34
/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/GooCanvas2/CairoTypes.pm
FIX: There is no point in packaging CairoTypes.pm file twice. Do not produce
perl-GooCanvas2-CairoTypes-devel subpackage.
FIX: You are missing GooCanvas2::CairoTypes.3pm.gz file.

$ rpm -q --requires -p

[Bug 1980117] Review Request: picocli - Java command line parser with both an annotations API and a programmatic API

2021-07-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980117



--- Comment #10 from Tomas Hrcka  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/picocli


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1976336] Review Request: python-fqdn - Validates fully-qualified domain names against RFC 1123

2021-07-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976336



--- Comment #7 from Tomas Hrcka  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-fqdn


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1970460] Review Request: perl-GooCanvas2-CairoTypes - Bridge between GooCanvas2 and Cairo types

2021-07-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1970460

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ppi...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review?




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1970460] Review Request: perl-GooCanvas2-CairoTypes - Bridge between GooCanvas2 and Cairo types

2021-07-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1970460



--- Comment #5 from MartinKG  ---
needed by shutter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1970748


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1970460] Review Request: perl-GooCanvas2-CairoTypes - Bridge between GooCanvas2 and Cairo types

2021-07-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1970460

MartinKG  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
   |perl-goocanvas2-cairotypes  |perl-GooCanvas2-CairoTypes
   |- Bridge between GooCanvas2 |- Bridge between GooCanvas2
   |and Cairo types |and Cairo types




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

51 matches

Mail list logo