[Bug 2133142] Review Request: golang-github-inhies-bytesize - Functionality for measuring and displaying byte sizes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133142 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||2132066 Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132066 [Bug 2132066] tinygo-0.26.0 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133142 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2133142] New: Review Request: golang-github-inhies-bytesize - Functionality for measuring and displaying byte sizes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133142 Bug ID: 2133142 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-inhies-bytesize - Functionality for measuring and displaying byte sizes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: quantum.anal...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org/reviews/golang-github-inhies-bytesize/golang-github-inhies-bytesize.spec SRPM URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org/reviews/golang-github-inhies-bytesize/golang-github-inhies-bytesize-0-0.1.20221008git4913239.fc36.src.rpm Description: Package bytesize provides functionality for measuring and displaying byte sizes. Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=92780972 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133142 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2133114] Review Request: pkcs11test - PKCS#11 Test Suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133114 --- Comment #2 from Benson Muite --- There are 2 files with the name LICENSE. In the source, these are in two separate directories, but in the package they are both copied to /usr/share/licenses/pkcs11test so overwrite each other. Maybe one of the license files should be renamed? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133114 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2080368] Review Request: kcat - Generic command line non-JVM Apache Kafka producer and consumer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2080368 --- Comment #2 from Link Dupont --- Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/linkdupont/reviews/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/04894594-kcat/kcat.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/linkdupont/reviews/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/04894594-kcat/kcat-1.7.1-1.fc38.src.rpm Description: Generic command line non-JVM Apache Kafka producer and consumer Fedora Account System Username: linkdupont fedora-review URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/linkdupont/reviews/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/04894594-kcat/fedora-review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2080368 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2131705] Review Request: python-dotref - Simple tool to manage dotfiles
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131705
Maxwell G changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gotmax@e.email
--- Comment #1 from Maxwell G ---
Here's some drive by feedback:
There's new macros for shell completions, and all of the completions
directories are owned by filesystem. You can apply this patch[1] to your
specfile and see [2] for more information.
[1]: https://paste.sr.ht/~gotmax23/ad16ede10a059f561e61ce348dd38eb3abc7a22f
[2]: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/1202
You reference %{pypi_name}, but that doesn't seem to be defined anywhere in
your specfile. Instead of defining that macro, I'd suggest replacing all
instances of `%{pypi_name}` with the literal value.
```
# Remove bundled egg-info
rm -rf %{pypi_name}.egg-info
```
There's no dotref.egg-info file in the archive, and this wouldn't be necessary
even if there was.
> Source: %{url}/archive/refs/tags/v%{version}/dotref-%{version}.tar.gz
The preferred format is %{url}/archive/v%{version}/dotref-%{version}.tar.gz,
but meh
---
It would be nice if you provided a link to a COPR or Koji scratch build.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131705
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2035958] Review Request: libchipcard - A library for easy access to smart cards (chipcards)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035958 --- Comment #28 from Benson Muite --- Plugin library non-versioning seems ok based on https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_downstream_so_name_versioning -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035958 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2035958] Review Request: libchipcard - A library for easy access to smart cards (chipcards)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035958 Benson Muite changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #27 from Benson Muite --- In the spec file, can you remove # Signing key is not known and add location signing key was obtained from # Keyfile obtained from https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?op=get=0xe9899d784a977416 With those changes, approved -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035958 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2133114] Review Request: pkcs11test - PKCS#11 Test Suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133114 Benson Muite changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|benson_mu...@emailplus.org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||benson_mu...@emailplus.org Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133114 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2133114] Review Request: pkcs11test - PKCS#11 Test Suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133114 Davide Cavalca changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #1 from Davide Cavalca --- This builds fine on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=92770849 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133114 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2133114] New: Review Request: pkcs11test - PKCS#11 Test Suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133114 Bug ID: 2133114 Summary: Review Request: pkcs11test - PKCS#11 Test Suite Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: dcava...@fb.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/pkcs11test/pkcs11test.spec SRPM URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/pkcs11test/pkcs11test-0^20220308git56debd5-1.fc38.src.rpm Description: This package provides a test suite for PCKS#11. Fedora Account System Username: dcavalca -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133114 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2124546] Review Request: duo_unix - Duo two-factor authentication for UNIX systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124546 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2022-4d49b7dddf has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-4d49b7dddf -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124546 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2124546] Review Request: duo_unix - Duo two-factor authentication for UNIX systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124546 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2022-0af92cee1f has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-0af92cee1f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124546 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2056006] Review Request: golang-github-bradenhilton-mozillainstallhash - Generate differentiating hash between Mozilla software installs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2056006 Anthony Rabbito changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review+ ||needinfo?(quantum.analyst@g ||mail.com) --- Comment #4 from Anthony Rabbito --- Hi Elliott there's a summary mismatch between the SRPM and spec file. Do you mind making them the same? ``` -Summary:Generate differentiating hash between Mozilla software installs +Summary:Go package which generates the hash used to differentiate between installs of Mozilla software ``` Otherwise spec looks good. You can optionally regenerate with go2rpm to adopt to the new style. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2056006 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2056006] Review Request: golang-github-bradenhilton-mozillainstallhash - Generate differentiating hash between Mozilla software installs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2056006 Anthony Rabbito changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|he...@anthonyrabbito.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2056006 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2056369] Review Request: python-colcon-alias - Extension for colcon to create and modify command aliases
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2056369 Jakub Kadlčík changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags||fedora-review? Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jkadl...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2056369 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2056369] Review Request: python-colcon-alias - Extension for colcon to create and modify command aliases
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2056369 Jakub Kadlčík changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jkadl...@redhat.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #1 from Jakub Kadlčík --- Hello Scott, thank you for the package. > License:ASL 2.0 I don't know if it is required yet but we are moving towards SPDX license names, which would be Apache-2.0 according to https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/allowed-licenses/ > URL:https://colcon.readthedocs.io I am thinking about whether we should rather use https://github.com/colcon/colcon-alias I went to the colon.readthedocs.io URL browsed it a little and couldn't find any information about the colcon-alias extension. > %description > An extension for colcon-core to create and modify command aliases. Can you please write 2-3 sentences about the package here? It's not clear to me what it does and how it works. > This spec file is intended to follow the same pattern as the other 38 > `colcon` packages already in Fedora. I wanted to point out a couple of non-standard things in the spec but adhering to the boilerplate of other colcon packages makes a lot of sense and it is IMHO a better idea than nitpicking, so otherwise LGTM. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2056369 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2120459] Review Request: golang-github-zalando-keyring - Cross-platform keyring interface for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120459 --- Comment #3 from Anthony Rabbito --- I have updated the spec to remove an unused `%global` and regenerated with the latest 1.8.x go2rpm Spec URL: https://anthr76.fedorapeople.org/golang-github-zalando-keyring/golang-github-zalando-keyring.spec SRPM URL: https://anthr76.fedorapeople.org/golang-github-zalando-keyring/golang-github-zalando-keyring-0.2.1-1.fc37.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120459 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2124546] Review Request: duo_unix - Duo two-factor authentication for UNIX systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124546 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-4207a7acd1 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-4207a7acd1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124546 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2131603] Review Request: nagios-plugins-check_newest_file_age - Nagios plugin to monitor file timestamps
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131603
--- Comment #2 from Otto Liljalaakso ---
This is a review *template*. Besides handling the [ ]-marked tests you are
also supposed to fix the template before pasting into bugzilla:
- Add issues you find to the list of issues on top. If there isn't such
a list, create one.
- Add your own remarks to the template checks.
- Add new lines marked [!] or [?] when you discover new things not
listed by fedora-review.
- Change or remove any text in the template which is plain wrong. In this
case you could also file a bug against fedora-review
- Remove the "[ ] Manual check required", you will not have any such lines
in what you paste.
- Remove attachments which you deem not really useful (the rpmlint
ones are mandatory, though)
- Remove this text
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "MIT License", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* GNU
General Public License". 2 files have unknown license. Detailed output
of licensecheck in
/home/otto/src/Jakelut/Fedora/Katselmointi/2131603-nagios-plugins-
check_newest_file_age/licensecheck.txt
[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib64/nagios,
/usr/lib64/nagios/plugins
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[x]:
[Bug 2131603] Review Request: nagios-plugins-check_newest_file_age - Nagios plugin to monitor file timestamps
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131603 Otto Liljalaakso changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review? CC||otto.liljalaa...@iki.fi Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|otto.liljalaa...@iki.fi Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #1 from Otto Liljalaakso --- > Name: nagios-plugins-check_newest_file_age According to nagios-plugins naming convention, this should be nagios-plugins-newest_file_age. (This comment is not review blocking.) > BuildRequires: make I believe this is not needed. If it is, ignore this comment. You could do BuildRequires: coreutils to be explicit about having 'install', though. Or just BuildRequires: /usr/bin/install. > [!]: Package must own all directories that it creates. > Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib64/nagios, > /usr/lib64/nagios/plugins Please add Requires: nagios-common > [!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. > Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see > attached diff). > See: (this test has no URL) This is just because 'fedpkg srpm', fedora-review and rpmautospec are not compatible. No action needed, just do not try to 'fedpkg import' that srpm. > nagios-plugins-check_newest_file_age.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib $ rpmlint -e only-non-binary-in-usr-lib only-non-binary-in-usr-lib: There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share. Nagios plugins directory in under /usr/lib64, putting a shell script there is valid. No action needed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131603 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2131602] Review Request: nagios-plugins-check_ssl_cert - Nagios plugin to check SSL certificates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131602 Otto Liljalaakso changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(thofmann@fedorapr ||oject.org) --- Comment #2 from Otto Liljalaakso --- > Name: nagios-plugins-check_ssl_cert As discussed in bug 2082886, following the usual Nagios plugin naming, this should be nagion-plugins-ssl_cert. (This comment is not review blocking.) > Version:2.49.0 This is not the latest version. v2.25.0 is out already. The latest version should be packaged. However, upstream releases so often (three releases yesterday!), that I am not going to block the review because of this. > URL: > https://exchange.nagios.org/directory/Plugins/Network-Protocols/HTTP/check_ssl_cert This link is not correct. It shows a corrupted version of the /directory/ path. Appending /details/ shows the intended page. However, that page has not been updated since 2020-08, and e.g. claims that the latest version is 1.122.0. I am not sure if it better to use this or the GitHub repo — your call. > [!]: %check is present and all tests pass. Upstream provides folder test/ with some tests, either execute it or provide a comment explaining why not. > [!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. > Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see > attached diff). > See: (this test has no URL) This is just because 'fedpkg srpm', fedora-review and rpmautospec are not compatible. No action needed, just do not try to 'fedpkg import' that srpm. > nagios-plugins-check_ssl_cert.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib $ rpmlint -e only-non-binary-in-usr-lib only-non-binary-in-usr-lib: There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share. Nagios plugins directory in under /usr/lib64, putting a shell script there is valid. No action needed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131602 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2124546] Review Request: duo_unix - Duo two-factor authentication for UNIX systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124546 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-502a017a92 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-502a017a92 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124546 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2124546] Review Request: duo_unix - Duo two-factor authentication for UNIX systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124546 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-04897a2ade has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-04897a2ade -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124546 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2131602] Review Request: nagios-plugins-check_ssl_cert - Nagios plugin to check SSL certificates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131602 Otto Liljalaakso changed: What|Removed |Added CC||otto.liljalaa...@iki.fi Flags||fedora-review? Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|otto.liljalaa...@iki.fi -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131602 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2082886] Review Request: nagios-plugins-systemd - Nagios plugin to check systemd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2082886 Otto Liljalaakso changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2082886 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2082886] Review Request: nagios-plugins-systemd - Nagios plugin to check systemd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2082886
--- Comment #8 from Otto Liljalaakso ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU Lesser General Public License,
Version 2.1", "*No copyright* GNU Library General Public License,
Version 2.0". 43 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in
/home/otto/src/Jakelut/Fedora/Katselmointi/2082886-nagios-plugins-
systemd/licensecheck.txt
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[!]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
Note: Incorrect Requires : /usr/lib64/nagios/plugins
See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
guidelines/#_file_and_directory_dependencies
[ ]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[ ]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[ ]: Package functions as described.
[ ]: Latest version is packaged.
[ ]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[ ]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[ ]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[ ]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[ ]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec
[Bug 2082886] Review Request: nagios-plugins-systemd - Nagios plugin to check systemd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2082886 --- Comment #7 from Otto Liljalaakso --- > Summary:Nagios plugin to check systemd Many existing Nagios plugins seem to use the following convention: "Nagios Plugin - check_systemd". Maybe it would make sense to use it here as well, so that 'dnf search check_systemd' would find it. (This comment is not review blocking.) > [!]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. > Note: Incorrect Requires : /usr/lib64/nagios/plugins > See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- > guidelines/#_file_and_directory_dependencies Your solution for depending on the directory itself makes sense, but unfortunately, the Packaging Guidelines say you SHOULD NOT have a file dependency outside of certain fixed paths. So please just do Requires: nagios-common. Reference is included above. > [!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. > Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see > attached diff). > See: (this test has no URL) This is just an incompatibility between 'fedpkg srpm', fedora-review and rpmautospec. No action needed, just remember not to do 'fedpkg import' with that srpm. > Provides > > nagios-plugins-systemd: > python3.11dist(check-systemd) > python3dist(check-systemd) I actually find it quite strange that this plugin is marked as an installed Python package. It does not provide anything that is available for anything else to use, and we already discovered with the problem in %check. Unfortunately, I am not good enough with Python to say, if it would make sense to suggest upstream to install the main content to a module in site-packages. (This comment is not release blocking.) Since there is only one review blocking comment left, and that one is very simple to correct, I do not think it makes sense to strecth the review any longer. Package accepted. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2082886 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2124546] Review Request: duo_unix - Duo two-factor authentication for UNIX systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124546 --- Comment #7 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/duo_unix -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124546 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2124546] Review Request: duo_unix - Duo two-factor authentication for UNIX systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124546 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Michel Alexandre Salim --- Changes look good. APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124546 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2124546] Review Request: duo_unix - Duo two-factor authentication for UNIX systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124546 Davide Cavalca changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(dcava...@fb.com) | --- Comment #5 from Davide Cavalca --- Spec URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/duo_unix/duo_unix.spec SRPM URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/duo_unix/duo_unix-1.12.1-2.fc38.src.rpm Changelog: - Update openssl BR - Fix duplicate license file - Add check section and conditionally run tests -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124546 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2120460] Review Request: gops - list and diagnose Go processes currently running on your system.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120460 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2022-10-07 19:57:37 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-fbaa319327 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120460 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2120460] Review Request: gops - list and diagnose Go processes currently running on your system.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120460 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-fbaa319327 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-fbaa319327 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120460 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2035958] Review Request: libchipcard - A library for easy access to smart cards (chipcards)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035958 --- Comment #26 from Gwyn Ciesla --- Thank you, that worked! SRPM: https://fedorapeople.org/~limb/review/libchipcard/libchipcard-5.1.6-5.fc37.src.rpm SPEC: https://fedorapeople.org/~limb/review/libchipcard/libchipcard.spec Possibly, they may request that. gwenhywfar is already in Fedora. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035958 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2120447] Review Request: golang-github-keybase-ps - Find, list, and inspect processes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120447 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-08614747f1 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-08614747f1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120447 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2120447] Review Request: golang-github-keybase-ps - Find, list, and inspect processes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120447 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-344d731179 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-344d731179 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120447 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2120460] Review Request: gops - list and diagnose Go processes currently running on your system.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120460 Bug 2120460 depends on bug 2120447, which changed state. Bug 2120447 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-keybase-ps - Find, list, and inspect processes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120447 What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120460 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2120447] Review Request: golang-github-keybase-ps - Find, list, and inspect processes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120447 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2022-10-07 19:36:33 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-eba1b74fdc has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120447 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2120447] Review Request: golang-github-keybase-ps - Find, list, and inspect processes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120447 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-eba1b74fdc has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-eba1b74fdc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120447 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2131402] Review Request: golang-github-charmbracelet-bubbletea - A powerful little TUI framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131402 Anthony Rabbito changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|he...@anthonyrabbito.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131402 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2133080] New: Review Request: python-nss - Python bindings for Network Security Services (NSS)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133080 Bug ID: 2133080 Summary: Review Request: python-nss - Python bindings for Network Security Services (NSS) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: reallylongw...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dashea/specs/main/python-nss/python-nss.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/dshea/python-nss/srpm-builds/04891563/python-nss-1.0.120210803hg9de14a6f77e2-1.fc36.src.rpm Description: Python bindings for Network Security Services (NSS). This package was previously retired due to lack of time/interest on the part of the original maintainer, but there are still packages in Fedora (sigul) that depend on it. Sigul seems kind of vital so I'd like to see that working again. Fedora Account System Username: dshea -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133080 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2124546] Review Request: duo_unix - Duo two-factor authentication for UNIX systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124546 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(dcava...@fb.com) --- Comment #4 from Michel Alexandre Salim --- - please update to depending on openssl-devel, I just checked locally and it works fine - please add a %check section. `sudo make check` seems to work fine (yes it fails if sudo is not used, sigh) so you might want to disable the tests that involve writing to pam.d - the crypto tests don't require it Exception: Permission denied opening pam.d make sure you run tests with elevated permissions -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124546 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2115102] Review Request: python-pylero - Python wrapper for the Polarion WSDL API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115102 --- Comment #25 from Wayne Sun --- Updated spec urls Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/RedHatQE/pylero/main/python-pylero.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/waynesun20/pylero/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/04893370-python-pylero/python-pylero-0.0.4-1.fc38.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115102 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2115102] Review Request: python-pylero - Python wrapper for the Polarion WSDL API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115102 --- Comment #24 from Wayne Sun --- (In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #23) > Sorry for the delay, I somehow missed this is back on me now. > > > > > So the pylero CLI is not recommended for fedora as it prefer gnureadline > > package (non-fedora release) over native python3 readline package, this > > should not be an issue for packaging, I have removed the 'rm' part. > > I don't know what you mean here, sorry. Does the command not work when > executed? > It works but it works better when using gnureadline package. > > > I have added the %pyproject_check_import under %check. > > Thanks. Why with -t? If the Polarion server url is not specified in config some library will failed to import, so only specify to import from top. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115102 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2132809] Re-review Request: minizip-ng - Renaming minizip to minizip-ng
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132809 --- Comment #2 from Lukas Javorsky --- There were a few errors in the previous version. The new working version has replaced the files mentioned in comment#1 This is the diff between the new version: http://pastebin.test.redhat.com/1076754 This is the scratch build of the SRPM: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=92742407 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132809 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2035958] Review Request: libchipcard - A library for easy access to smart cards (chipcards)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035958
--- Comment #25 from Benson Muite ---
Obtain the text content of
https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?op=get=0xe9899d784a977416 and
save it as keyfile.asc
Then update the following lines of the spec file
# Download is PHP form at http://www.aquamaniac.de/sites/download/packages.php
Source0:
https://www.aquamaniac.de/rdm/attachments/download/382/libchipcard-%{version}.tar.gz
Source1:
https://www.aquamaniac.de/rdm/attachments/download/381/libchipcard-%{version}.tar.gz.asc
License: LGPL-2.0-only and GPL-2.0-or-later and LGPL-2.1-or-later
# Most LGPL 2
# LGPL 2.1+: src/lib/version.h
# GPLv2+: src/tools/cardcommander/cardcommander.cpp, src/tools/kvkcard/main.c,
src/tools/memcard/main.c
# Keyfile obtained from
https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?op=get=0xe9899d784a977416
Source2: keyfile.asc
URL: https://www.aquamaniac.de/rdm/projects/libchipcard
and
%autosetup -n %{name}-%{version}
%{gpgverify} --keyring='%{SOURCE2}' --signature='%{SOURCE1}'
--data='%{SOURCE0}'
Further comments:
a) GeldKarte will be withdrawn in 2024 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geldkarte
b) Maybe it is helpful to have the library developers as co-maintainers? The
related package gwenhywfar has a spec file template in the source repository
https://www.aquamaniac.de/rdm/projects/gwenhywfar/repository
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035958
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2019289] Review Request: golang-github-mdlayher-socket - Low-level network connection type with asynchronous I/O and deadline support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2019289 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-a9bbb44c92 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2022-a9bbb44c92` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-a9bbb44c92 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2019289 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2019290] Review Request: golang-github-josharian-native - Easy to use native encoding/binary.ByteOrder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2019290 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-a9bbb44c92 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2022-a9bbb44c92` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-a9bbb44c92 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2019290 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2120419] Review Request: golang-github-bmatcuk-doublestar-4 - Implements support for double star matches in golang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120419 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-42dfcfec7c has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2022-42dfcfec7c \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-42dfcfec7c See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120419 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2120462] Review Request: golang-github-twpayne-shell - go-shell returns a user's shell across multiple platforms
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120462 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-1536ba565d has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2022-1536ba565d \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-1536ba565d See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120462 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2019290] Review Request: golang-github-josharian-native - Easy to use native encoding/binary.ByteOrder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2019290 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-b885e1466d has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2022-b885e1466d` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-b885e1466d See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2019290 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2019289] Review Request: golang-github-mdlayher-socket - Low-level network connection type with asynchronous I/O and deadline support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2019289 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-b885e1466d has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2022-b885e1466d` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-b885e1466d See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2019289 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2130733] Review Request: golang-github-google-renameio-2 - atomically create or replace a file or symbolic link.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2130733 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-07809a0b0e has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2022-07809a0b0e \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-07809a0b0e See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2130733 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2120452] Review Request: golang-github-twpayne-vfs-4 - v4 import path of twpayne-vfs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120452 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-d127c7a6a5 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2022-d127c7a6a5 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-d127c7a6a5 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120452 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2021040] Review Request: spacebar - Messaging app for Plasma Mobile
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2021040 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|spacebar-22.09-1.fc37 |spacebar-22.09-1.fc37 ||spacebar-22.09-1.fc36 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-6054582285 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2021040 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2041266] Review Request: plasma-phonebook - Convergent Plasma Mobile phonebook application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041266 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|plasma-phonebook-22.09-1.fc |plasma-phonebook-22.09-1.fc |37 |37 ||plasma-phonebook-22.09-1.fc ||36 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-6054582285 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041266 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2131842] Review Request: CalcMySky - Simulator of light scattering by planetary atmospheres
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131842 Gwyn Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2022-10-07 15:31:35 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131842 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2131842] Review Request: CalcMySky - Simulator of light scattering by planetary atmospheres
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131842 --- Comment #8 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/CalcMySky -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131842 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2131842] Review Request: CalcMySky - Simulator of light scattering by planetary atmospheres
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131842 --- Comment #7 from Gwyn Ciesla --- Wonderful, will do, thank you so much! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131842 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2035958] Review Request: libchipcard - A library for easy access to smart cards (chipcards)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035958 --- Comment #24 from Gwyn Ciesla --- Right, and the build in koji will not have internet access. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035958 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2132956] Review Request: vagrant-scp - Copy files to a Vagrant VM via SCP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132956
--- Comment #5 from Evgeni Golov ---
% cat /usr/share/vagrant/gems/specifications/vagrant-scp-0.5.9.gemspec
# -*- encoding: utf-8 -*-
# stub: vagrant-scp 0.5.9 ruby lib
Gem::Specification.new do |s|
s.name = "vagrant-scp".freeze
s.version = "0.5.9"
s.required_rubygems_version = Gem::Requirement.new(">= 0".freeze) if
s.respond_to? :required_rubygems_version=
s.require_paths = ["lib".freeze]
s.authors = ["Luca Invernizzi".freeze]
s.date = "2021-11-08"
s.description = "Copy files to a Vagrant VM via SCP.".freeze
s.email = ["invernizz...@gmail.com".freeze]
s.homepage = "https://github.com/invernizzi/vagrant-scp".freeze
s.licenses = ["MIT".freeze]
s.rubygems_version = "3.3.22".freeze
s.summary = "Copy files to a Vagrant VM via SCP.".freeze
s.installed_by_version = "3.3.22" if s.respond_to? :installed_by_version
if s.respond_to? :specification_version then
s.specification_version = 4
end
if s.respond_to? :add_runtime_dependency then
s.add_development_dependency(%q.freeze, [">= 2.2.10"])
s.add_development_dependency(%q.freeze, [">= 12.3.3"])
s.add_runtime_dependency(%q.freeze, ["~> 1.1"])
s.add_runtime_dependency(%q.freeze, [">= 1.1"])
else
s.add_dependency(%q.freeze, [">= 2.2.10"])
s.add_dependency(%q.freeze, [">= 12.3.3"])
s.add_dependency(%q.freeze, ["~> 1.1"])
s.add_dependency(%q.freeze, [">= 1.1"])
end
end
% cat /usr/share/vagrant/gems/gems/vagrant-scp-0.5.9/vagrant-scp.gemspec
# coding: utf-8
lib = File.expand_path('../lib', __FILE__)
$LOAD_PATH.unshift(lib) unless $LOAD_PATH.include?(lib)
require 'vagrant/scp/version'
Gem::Specification.new do |spec|
spec.name = "vagrant-scp"
spec.version = Vagrant::Scp::VERSION
spec.authors = ["Luca Invernizzi"]
spec.email = ["invernizz...@gmail.com"]
spec.description = 'Copy files to a Vagrant VM via SCP.'
spec.summary = 'Copy files to a Vagrant VM via SCP.'
spec.homepage = "https://github.com/invernizzi/vagrant-scp;
spec.license = "MIT"
spec.files = `git ls-files`.split($/)
spec.executables = spec.files.grep(%r{^bin/}) { |f| File.basename(f) }
spec.test_files= spec.files.grep(%r{^(test|spec|features)/})
spec.require_paths = ["lib"]
spec.add_development_dependency "bundler", ">= 2.2.10"
spec.add_development_dependency "rake", ">= 12.3.3"
spec.add_runtime_dependency 'log4r', "~> 1.1"
spec.add_runtime_dependency 'net-scp', ">= 1.1"
end
They are different, indeed (even tho the result should be identical?)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132956
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2123242] Review Request: xephem - Scientific-grade interactive astronomical ephemeris software
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123242 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2022-10-07 14:51:29 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-6e172ac406 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123242 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2132956] Review Request: vagrant-scp - Copy files to a Vagrant VM via SCP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132956
Vít Ondruch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vondr...@redhat.com
--- Comment #4 from Vít Ondruch ---
(In reply to Evgeni Golov from comment #3)
> (In reply to Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden from comment #2)
> > This looks good to me. I do wonder about the gemspec file in
> > vagrant-scp-doc. Given there's already a gemspec in vagrant-scp I'd say it's
> > redundant.
>
> Technically true, but other vagrant-* packages also have this duplication.
If upstream includes the .gemspec in package, we tend to keep it (or address it
upstream, but ...). It has different content to `%{vagrant_plugin_spec}`
anyway.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132956
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2123242] Review Request: xephem - Scientific-grade interactive astronomical ephemeris software
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123242 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-6e172ac406 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-6e172ac406 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123242 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2131402] Review Request: golang-github-charmbracelet-bubbletea - A powerful little TUI framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131402 Bug 2131402 depends on bug 2131398, which changed state. Bug 2131398 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-muesli-ansi - Raw ANSI sequence helpers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131398 What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131402 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2131401] Review Request: golang-github-mattn-localereader - CodePage decoder for Windows
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131401 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2022-10-07 14:36:27 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-6292d4577a has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131401 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2131398] Review Request: golang-github-muesli-ansi - Raw ANSI sequence helpers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131398 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Last Closed||2022-10-07 14:36:33 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-cb643edbd2 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131398 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2131402] Review Request: golang-github-charmbracelet-bubbletea - A powerful little TUI framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131402 Bug 2131402 depends on bug 2131401, which changed state. Bug 2131401 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-mattn-localereader - CodePage decoder for Windows https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131401 What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131402 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2131398] Review Request: golang-github-muesli-ansi - Raw ANSI sequence helpers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131398 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-cb643edbd2 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-cb643edbd2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131398 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2131401] Review Request: golang-github-mattn-localereader - CodePage decoder for Windows
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131401 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-6292d4577a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-6292d4577a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131401 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2131402] Review Request: golang-github-charmbracelet-bubbletea - A powerful little TUI framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131402 Bug 2131402 depends on bug 2131397, which changed state. Bug 2131397 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-muesli-cancelreader - A cancelable reader for Go https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131397 What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131402 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2131397] Review Request: golang-github-muesli-cancelreader - A cancelable reader for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131397 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2022-10-07 14:33:26 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-e1b94dad3b has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131397 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2131397] Review Request: golang-github-muesli-cancelreader - A cancelable reader for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131397 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-e1b94dad3b has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-e1b94dad3b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131397 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2120661] Review Request: dnf5 - package management library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120661 Vít Ondruch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vondr...@redhat.com --- Comment #14 from Vít Ondruch --- I wish the package was named just `dnf` and the old DNF was renamed to `dnf4` instead. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120661 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2131842] Review Request: CalcMySky - Simulator of light scattering by planetary atmospheres
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131842
Mattia Verga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review- |fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from Mattia Verga ---
Upstream accepted my patch, I therefore mark the review ACCEPTED, provided that
you package the latest git commit or backport that patch and put
libShowMySky.so in -devel and libShowMySky.so.0{,.*} in the main package
(remember to not glob the soname major version -
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_listing_shared_library_files
).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131842
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2131397] Review Request: golang-github-muesli-cancelreader - A cancelable reader for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131397 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-muesli-cancelreader -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131397 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2131401] Review Request: golang-github-mattn-localereader - CodePage decoder for Windows
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131401 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-mattn-localereader -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131401 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2131398] Review Request: golang-github-muesli-ansi - Raw ANSI sequence helpers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131398 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-muesli-ansi -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131398 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2115102] Review Request: python-pylero - Python wrapper for the Polarion WSDL API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115102 --- Comment #23 from Miro Hrončok --- Sorry for the delay, I somehow missed this is back on me now. > So the pylero CLI is not recommended for fedora as it prefer gnureadline > package (non-fedora release) over native python3 readline package, this > should not be an issue for packaging, I have removed the 'rm' part. I don't know what you mean here, sorry. Does the command not work when executed? > I have updated the package name to python-pylero as it's preferred to be used > as library. OK. Please rename it to python-pylero.spec and post new links to spec and srpm. Always post new links to spec and srpm when you make updates to a package on review. Always in this form: Spec URL: https://... SRPM URL: https://... Make sure the links go to the actual spec and srpm (e.g. use the "raw" links when on GitHub). > I have added the %pyproject_check_import under %check. Thanks. Why with -t? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115102 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2130696] Review Request: php-kissifrot-php-ixr - XML-RPC library for PHP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2130696 Remi Collet changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Remi Collet --- [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. checked with PHP 8.0, 8.1 and 8.2 === APPROVED === -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2130696 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2130696] Review Request: php-kissifrot-php-ixr - XML-RPC library for PHP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2130696 Remi Collet changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|fed...@famillecollet.com --- Comment #2 from Remi Collet --- Created attachment 1916722 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1916722=edit review.txt -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2130696 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2130696] Review Request: php-kissifrot-php-ixr - XML-RPC library for PHP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2130696 Remi Collet changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fed...@famillecollet.com --- Comment #1 from Remi Collet --- Created attachment 1916721 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1916721=edit phpci.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2130696 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2127629] Review Request: php-splitbrain-slika - image handling library for PHP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2127629 Remi Collet changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Remi Collet --- [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. Notice: test suite passes with PHP 8.0, 8.1 and 8.2 APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2127629 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2123242] Review Request: xephem - Scientific-grade interactive astronomical ephemeris software
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123242 --- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xephem -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123242 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2120447] Review Request: golang-github-keybase-ps - Find, list, and inspect processes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120447 --- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-keybase-ps -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120447 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2120460] Review Request: gops - list and diagnose Go processes currently running on your system.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120460 --- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gops -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120460 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2131398] Review Request: golang-github-muesli-ansi - Raw ANSI sequence helpers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131398 Anthony Rabbito changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Anthony Rabbito --- go2rpm package: - [x] The specfile is sane. - [x] License is correct - [x] Builds successfully in mock - [x] Package is installable (checked by fedora-review) - [x] No relevant rpmlint errors - [x] %check section passes - [x] The latest version is packaged - [x] `%goipath` is set correctly - [-] Binaries don't conflict with binaries already in the distribution - [x] The package complies with the Packaging Guidelines. Package approved! On import, don't forget to do the following: - [ ] Add package to release-monitoring.org - [ ] Give go-sig privileges on package - [ ] Close the review bug by referencing it in the rpm changelog and the Bodhi ticket. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131398 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2132956] Review Request: vagrant-scp - Copy files to a Vagrant VM via SCP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132956 --- Comment #3 from Evgeni Golov --- (In reply to Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden from comment #2) > This looks good to me. I do wonder about the gemspec file in > vagrant-scp-doc. Given there's already a gemspec in vagrant-scp I'd say it's > redundant. Technically true, but other vagrant-* packages also have this duplication. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132956 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 1822847] Review Request: vl-gothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847 Benson Muite changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 1822847] Review Request: vl-gothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847 Benson Muite changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #18 from Benson Muite --- It installs from https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/fed500/vl-gothic-fonts/ so assume it is a problem with mock not the packaging. Probably the extensive comments from the template can be removed, but it is not essential. Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2131401] Review Request: golang-github-mattn-localereader - CodePage decoder for Windows
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131401 Anthony Rabbito changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Anthony Rabbito --- go2rpm package: - [x] The specfile is sane. - [x] License is correct - [x] Builds successfully in mock - [x] Package is installable (checked by fedora-review) - [x] No relevant rpmlint errors - [x] %check section passes - [x] The latest version is packaged - [x] `%goipath` is set correctly - [-] Binaries don't conflict with binaries already in the distribution - [x] The package complies with the Packaging Guidelines. Package approved! On import, don't forget to do the following: - [ ] Add package to release-monitoring.org - [ ] Give go-sig privileges on package - [ ] Close the review bug by referencing it in the rpm changelog and the Bodhi ticket. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131401 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2131398] Review Request: golang-github-muesli-ansi - Raw ANSI sequence helpers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131398 Anthony Rabbito changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131398 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2131401] Review Request: golang-github-mattn-localereader - CodePage decoder for Windows
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131401 Anthony Rabbito changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131401 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2131397] Review Request: golang-github-muesli-cancelreader - A cancelable reader for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131397 Anthony Rabbito changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review+ Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Anthony Rabbito --- go2rpm package: - [x] The specfile is sane. - [x] License is correct - [x] Builds successfully in mock - [x] Package is installable (checked by fedora-review) - [x] No relevant rpmlint errors - [x] %check section passes - [x] The latest version is packaged - [x] `%goipath` is set correctly - [-] Binaries don't conflict with binaries already in the distribution - [x] The package complies with the Packaging Guidelines. Package approved! On import, don't forget to do the following: - [ ] Add package to release-monitoring.org - [ ] Give go-sig privileges on package - [ ] Close the review bug by referencing it in the rpm changelog and the Bodhi ticket. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131397 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2082886] Review Request: nagios-plugins-systemd - Nagios plugin to check systemd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2082886 Till Hofmann changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |python-nagios-plugins-check |nagios-plugins-systemd - |_systemd - Nagios plugin to |Nagios plugin to check |check systemd |systemd --- Comment #6 from Till Hofmann --- Spec URL: https://thofmann.fedorapeople.org/nagios-plugins-systemd.spec SRPM URL: https://thofmann.fedorapeople.org/nagios-plugins-systemd-2.3.1-2.fc38.src.rpm Thank you for the suggestions! I've renamed the package to nagios-plugins-systemd, this seems to be the most common naming scheme for nagios plugins. I've also added a Requires: for the plugin dir. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2082886 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2123184] Review Request: rust-nu-plugin - Nushell Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123184 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-07d62e1874 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2022-07d62e1874 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-07d62e1874 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123184 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2120419] Review Request: golang-github-bmatcuk-doublestar-4 - Implements support for double star matches in golang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120419 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-2443d27d58 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2022-2443d27d58 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-2443d27d58 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120419 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2120462] Review Request: golang-github-twpayne-shell - go-shell returns a user's shell across multiple platforms
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120462 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-d25d74f528 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2022-d25d74f528 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-d25d74f528 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120462 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2019290] Review Request: golang-github-josharian-native - Easy to use native encoding/binary.ByteOrder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2019290 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-c44390febf has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2022-c44390febf` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-c44390febf See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2019290 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2120452] Review Request: golang-github-twpayne-vfs-4 - v4 import path of twpayne-vfs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120452 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-e25f8af6f8 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2022-e25f8af6f8 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-e25f8af6f8 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120452 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2019289] Review Request: golang-github-mdlayher-socket - Low-level network connection type with asynchronous I/O and deadline support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2019289 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-c44390febf has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2022-c44390febf` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-c44390febf See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2019289 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
