[Bug 737972] Review Request: spacewalk-admin - Various utility scripts and data files for RHN Satellite installations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737972 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|spacewalk-admin-1.8.3-1.fc1 |spacewalk-admin-1.8.3-1.el5 |7 | --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-04-12 01:58:55 EDT --- spacewalk-admin-1.8.3-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737972] Review Request: spacewalk-admin - Various utility scripts and data files for RHN Satellite installations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737972 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|spacewalk-admin-1.8.3-1.el5 |spacewalk-admin-1.8.3-1.el6 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-04-12 01:59:48 EDT --- spacewalk-admin-1.8.3-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737972] Review Request: spacewalk-admin - Various utility scripts and data files for RHN Satellite installations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737972 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||spacewalk-admin-1.8.3-1.fc1 ||7 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2012-04-11 22:43:55 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-04-11 22:43:55 EDT --- spacewalk-admin-1.8.3-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737972] Review Request: spacewalk-admin - Various utility scripts and data files for RHN Satellite installations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737972 --- Comment #10 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com 2012-03-27 07:23:09 EDT --- Changelog entries fixed. Man pages added. Updated: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/spacewalk-admin/spacewalk-admin-1.8.3-1.fc16.src.rpm http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/spacewalk-admin/spacewalk-admin.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737972] Review Request: spacewalk-admin - Various utility scripts and data files for RHN Satellite installations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737972 Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org 2012-03-27 09:15:05 EDT --- [x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format. So the package is good to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737972] Review Request: spacewalk-admin - Various utility scripts and data files for RHN Satellite installations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737972 --- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-27 09:40:01 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737972] Review Request: spacewalk-admin - Various utility scripts and data files for RHN Satellite installations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737972 Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com 2012-03-27 09:36:57 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: spacewalk-admin Short Description: Various utility scripts and data files for RHN Satellite installations Owners: msuchy Branches: F-17, F-16, EL-5, EL-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737972] Review Request: spacewalk-admin - Various utility scripts and data files for RHN Satellite installations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737972 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737972] Review Request: spacewalk-admin - Various utility scripts and data files for RHN Satellite installations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737972 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-27 14:06:42 EDT --- spacewalk-admin-1.8.3-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/spacewalk-admin-1.8.3-1.fc17 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737972] Review Request: spacewalk-admin - Various utility scripts and data files for RHN Satellite installations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737972 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-27 14:31:02 EDT --- spacewalk-admin-1.8.3-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/spacewalk-admin-1.8.3-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737972] Review Request: spacewalk-admin - Various utility scripts and data files for RHN Satellite installations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737972 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-27 14:31:33 EDT --- spacewalk-admin-1.8.3-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/spacewalk-admin-1.8.3-1.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737972] Review Request: spacewalk-admin - Various utility scripts and data files for RHN Satellite installations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737972 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-28 00:54:51 EDT --- spacewalk-admin-1.8.3-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737972] Review Request: spacewalk-admin - Various utility scripts and data files for RHN Satellite installations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737972 --- Comment #3 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com 2012-03-26 04:06:39 EDT --- Updated: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/spacewalk-admin/spacewalk-admin-1.8.1-1.fc16.src.rpm http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/spacewalk-admin/spacewalk-admin.spec Please note that I'm member of upstream. Therefore I created new release (as I put those changes directly to upstream) and not put it in spec as patch. - for a fedora rpm, BuildRoot is no longer needed, same goes for %defattr, and %clean, and cleaning of %install We build the package for EPEL and mainly EPEL5 as well. And there there it is needed. It is easier to maintain the spec file when we can leave it there (and it makes no harm of Fedora). But if you insinst on that I can make separate spec for Fedora and for EPEL. you should consider using packages rather than filedesps fixed you should use %global, not %define for %rhnroot fixed you should also ( IMHO ) place requires on 1 line each, as it permit to have easier to read diff when sending patch That is only two perl packages. Somebody in past decided that it would be nice to have perl packages together. I do not think it is necessary, but if you see it as blocker, I can change it. the file spacewalk-service look like a init script, and recent fedora use systemd, so the file should be converted http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Systemd It looks like init script, but it is not. Spacewalk server is layered application and is build on top of several services (jabberd, httpd, tomcat6, osad-dispatcher, postgresql...). And since usually Spacewalk server is run on dedicated machine and these services are run just because Spacewalk server - if sysadmin want to restart Spacewalk, he would have to write: service tomcat6 stop service httpd stop ... service httpd start service tomcat6 start which means: he has to enumerate all services which Spacewalk requires, not forget single one and do it in correct order. To make it easy for sysadmin, we provide spacewalk-service script, which can do that. But it does *not* start those service during boot. And neither stop those services during shutdown. Each of those services still has its own initd/systemd script. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737972] Review Request: spacewalk-admin - Various utility scripts and data files for RHN Satellite installations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737972 --- Comment #4 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com 2012-03-26 04:10:25 EDT --- I forgot that in previous comment: Also, there is no file to give the license of the tarball Fixed as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737972] Review Request: spacewalk-admin - Various utility scripts and data files for RHN Satellite installations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737972 --- Comment #5 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org 2012-03-26 04:40:05 EDT --- No, neither buildroot or package on the same line are blocking. I will start the formal review soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737972] Review Request: spacewalk-admin - Various utility scripts and data files for RHN Satellite installations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737972 --- Comment #6 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org 2012-03-26 05:14:47 EDT --- The directory /var/lib/rhn is already owned by spacewalk-config, but according to the policy, the current way is ok ( unless spacewalk-config end somehow in the dependency chain of spacewalk-admin, but it doesn't seems to be the case, i am just mentioning to be complete ). So that's ok, according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership However, it seems that the package requires sudo, and nothing use it in the script, is this correct ? The same goes for restorecon, I didn't found where it is needed in the current tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737972] Review Request: spacewalk-admin - Various utility scripts and data files for RHN Satellite installations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737972 --- Comment #7 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com 2012-03-26 05:48:26 EDT --- You are correct. Usage of restorecon in this package has been removed year ago. And sudo even earlier. I will remove those requires completely. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737972] Review Request: spacewalk-admin - Various utility scripts and data files for RHN Satellite installations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737972 --- Comment #8 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com 2012-03-26 05:56:11 EDT --- Updated: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/spacewalk-admin/spacewalk-admin-1.8.2-1.fc16.src.rpm http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/spacewalk-admin/spacewalk-admin.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737972] Review Request: spacewalk-admin - Various utility scripts and data files for RHN Satellite installations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737972
--- Comment #9 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org 2012-03-26 11:40:12 EDT ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
Generic
[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
least one supported primary architecture.
[-]: MUST %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Buildroot is not present
Note: Buildroot is not needed unless packager plans to package for EPEL5
[x]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries.
[!]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
Note: Clean is needed only if supporting EPEL
[x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: MUST %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified.
[x]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm 4.4
Note: defattr() present in %files section. This is OK if packaging
for EPEL5. Otherwise not needed
[x]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
Note: rm -rf is only needed if supporting EPEL5
[x]: MUST Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Licenses found: UNKNOWN For detailed output of licensecheck see
file: /home/misc/checkout/git/FedoraReview/src/737972/licensecheck.txt
[x]: MUST Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: MUST No %config files under /usr.
[x]: MUST Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: MUST If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: MUST Package installs properly.
[x]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[!]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent.
rpmlint spacewalk-admin-1.8.2-1.fc18.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
rpmlint spacewalk-admin-1.8.2-1.fc18.noarch.rpm
spacewalk-admin.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary rhn-generate-pem.pl
spacewalk-admin.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary rhn-deploy-ca-cert.pl
spacewalk-admin.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary rhn-install-ssl-cert.pl
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
[x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[-]: MUST Package contains a SysV-style init script if in need of one.
[x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to
include it.
[x]: SHOULD Dist tag is present.
[x]: SHOULD No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin,
/usr/sbin.
[x]: SHOULD Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
--requires).
[x]: SHOULD Package functions as described.
[x]: SHOULD Latest version is packaged.
[x]: SHOULD Package does not include license text files separate from
upstream.
[x]: SHOULD SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: SHOULD Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: SHOULD Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: SHOULD
[Bug 737972] Review Request: spacewalk-admin - Various utility scripts and data files for RHN Satellite installations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737972 Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|m...@zarb.org Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737972] Review Request: spacewalk-admin - Various utility scripts and data files for RHN Satellite installations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737972 Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m...@zarb.org --- Comment #1 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org 2012-03-24 03:28:04 EDT --- Hi, can you update the spec file for the latest release ( and the tarball for the version 1.6.X are missing ) ? also, a few note : - for a fedora rpm, BuildRoot is no longer needed, same goes for %defattr, and %clean, and cleaning of %install - you should use %global, not %define for %rhnroot http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define - you should consider using packages rather than filedesps, for reasons listed in the guideline : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_Dependencies - you should also ( IMHO ) place requires on 1 line each, as it permit to have easier to read diff when sending patch - the file spacewalk-service look like a init script, and recent fedora use systemd, so the file should be converted http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Systemd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737972] Review Request: spacewalk-admin - Various utility scripts and data files for RHN Satellite installations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737972 --- Comment #2 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org 2012-03-24 03:37:54 EDT --- Also, there is no file to give the license of the tarball, and you should ask upstream to add one : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737972] Review Request: spacewalk-admin - Various utility scripts and data files for RHN Satellite installations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737972 Milan Zazrivec mzazri...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||765736(space17) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737972] Review Request: spacewalk-admin - Various utility scripts and data files for RHN Satellite installations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737972 Milan Zazrivec mzazri...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|765736(space17) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737972] Review Request: spacewalk-admin - Various utility scripts and data files for RHN Satellite installations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737972 Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||452450(F-Spacewalk) Alias||spacewalk-admin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
