[Bug 1531380] Review Request: perl-Path-Iter - Simple Efficient Path Iteration

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531380



--- Comment #8 from Petr Pisar  ---
Waiting. The requests are reviewed by a human being. Or you can complain on
#fedora-releng FreeNode channel.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 960064] Review Request: rubygem-lumberjack - A fast logging utility

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960064



--- Comment #11 from Vít Ondruch  ---
Thank you guys!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1508126] Review Request: micro - A modern and intuitive terminal-based text editor

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1508126



--- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
It should be in Rawhide now.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1533472] New: Review Rename Request: webkit2gtk3 - GTK+ Web content engine library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533472

Bug ID: 1533472
   Summary: Review Rename Request: webkit2gtk3 - GTK+ Web content
engine library
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: tpop...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://tpopela.fedorapeople.org/webkit2gtk3.spec
SRPM URL: https://tpopela.fedorapeople.org/webkit2gtk3-2.19.5-2.fc27.src.rpm
Description: 

Hi,
I'm asking for a review of the webkitgtk4 package rename to webkit2gtk3.

The reason behind is that the number on the end is not tight to the GTK+
version, but to the API version. The problem is that it brings some confusion
among our users (that we saw during the webkitgtk and webkitgtk3 deprecations)
- please see
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ERLSWM4UBLEXMXKXZUEMS2P6HEBGOAQV/
. The are currently no plans for GTK+ 4 based WebKitGTK+, but we should be
ready for it.

We want to rename the package only in rawhide (F28+). F26 and F27 will still
have webkitgtk4.

Fedora Account System Username: tpopela

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1533472] Review Rename Request: webkit2gtk3 - GTK+ Web content engine library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533472



--- Comment #1 from Tomas Popela  ---
I should also note, that other distributions (Debian, Suse) are using the
webkit2gtk3 name.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532837] Review Request: python-uranium-lulzbot - A Python framework for building desktop applications

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532837

Miro Hrončok  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #4 from Miro Hrončok  ---
Approved.

Juts a nitpick: I've noticed you define shortname but than use uranium-lulzbot
trough the spec a lot.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1533472] Review Rename Request: webkit2gtk3 - GTK+ Web content engine library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533472

Kalev Lember  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||klem...@redhat.com



--- Comment #2 from Kalev Lember  ---
That's incorrect according to my findings. Debian and Ubuntu are using
webkit2gtk source package name and libwebkit2gtk-4.0-37 for the binary package
with the library and libwebkit2gtk-4.0-dev for the development files:
https://packages.debian.org/source/sid/webkit2gtk

openSUSE indeed uses webkit2gtk3:
https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/GNOME:Factory/webkit2gtk3

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1533472] Review Rename Request: webkit2gtk3 - GTK+ Web content engine library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533472

Kalev Lember  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|klem...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #3 from Kalev Lember  ---
I've verified the obsoletes and provides and they all look good to me and all
subpackages should be correctly covered for webkitgtk4->webkit2gtk3 rename.
Beyond that, the packaging and upstream sources are the same as in the existing
webkitgtk4 package and no changes there.

APPROVED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1533472] Review Rename Request: webkit2gtk3 - GTK+ Web content engine library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533472



--- Comment #4 from Tomas Popela  ---
(In reply to Kalev Lember from comment #2)
> That's incorrect according to my findings. Debian and Ubuntu are using
> webkit2gtk source package name and libwebkit2gtk-4.0-37 for the binary
> package with the library and libwebkit2gtk-4.0-dev for the development
> files: https://packages.debian.org/source/sid/webkit2gtk

Indeed. Thank you for correcting me!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1533490] New: Review Request: iucode-tool - iucode_tool is a program to manipulate microcode update collections for Intel i686 and X86-64 system processors , and prepare them for use by the Li

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533490

Bug ID: 1533490
   Summary: Review Request: iucode-tool - iucode_tool is a program
to manipulate microcode update collections for Intel
i686 and X86-64 system processors, and prepare them
for use by the Linux kernel
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: puiterw...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org




Spec URL: http://puiterwijk.fedorapeople.org//iucode-tool.spec
SRPM URL: http://puiterwijk.fedorapeople.org//iucode-tool-2.2-1.fc27.src.rpm

Description:
iucode_tool is a program to manipulate microcode update collections for Intel
i686 and X86-64 system processors, and prepare them for use by the Linux
kernel.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1533490] Review Request: iucode-tool - iucode_tool is a program to manipulate microcode update collections for Intel i686 and X86-64 system processors , and prepare them for use by the Linux k

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533490



--- Comment #1 from Patrick Uiterwijk  ---
This package built on koji: 
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=24129941

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1531380] Review Request: perl-Path-Iter - Simple Efficient Path Iteration

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531380



--- Comment #9 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Path-Iter

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532082] Review Request: python-klusta - Spike detection and automatic clustering for spike sorting

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532082



--- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-klusta

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1533472] Review Rename Request: webkit2gtk3 - GTK+ Web content engine library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533472

Sergio Monteiro Basto  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ser...@serjux.com



--- Comment #5 from Sergio Monteiro Basto  ---
yes webkit2gtk , maybe the correct name , also checked arch Linux [1]

- Look at this commit [2] internally is webkit2gtk-4.0 
- When Gtk+ 4 [3] the same webkit2gtk IIRC should support the 2 gtk+ 3 and 4 .

For these reasons, IMHO, seems to me webkit2gtk is more appropriate , or even
webkit2gtk-4.0 (with - , to not confuse with gtk4) .

Best regards, 

[1]
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/webkit2gtk/

[2]
https://github.com/hyperair/geany-plugins/commit/1fd266a97b9fedb0ae463a2cf9a409af27bb0ae6
 

[3]
https://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/2016/06/13/gtk-4-0-is-not-gtk-4/ 
https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/GTK%2B/Roadmap/GTK4

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1533490] Review Request: iucode-tool - iucode_tool is a program to manipulate microcode update collections for Intel i686 and X86-64 system processors , and prepare them for use by the Linux k

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533490

Dennis Gilmore  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #2 from Dennis Gilmore  ---
Issues:
===
- Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
  Note: iucode-tool-debugsource : /usr/src/debug/iucode-
  tool-2.2-1.fc28.x86_64/intel_microcode.h
  See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#DevelPackages


= MUST items =

C/C++:
[ ]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[ ]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[ ]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[ ]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "GPL (v2 or later)", "GPL (v3 or later)", "Unknown or
 generated", "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "GPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect
 FSF address)", "FSF All Permissive". 19 files have unknown license.
 Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/dennis/1533490-iucode-
 tool/licensecheck.txt
[ ]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[ ]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
 Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/lib/.build-id(python-
 libxml2, kde-platform-plugin, libreport-plugin-kerneloops,
 libhbalinux, cups-client, efivar-libs, netcdf, rsyslog, libselinux-
 ruby, librsync, policycoreutils-python-utils, lz4-libs, qemu-block-
 gluster, rpm-plugin-selinux, abrt, libmediaart, postgresql-libs,
 giflib, perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random, perl-GSSAPI, trousers, ots-libs,
 dirac-libs, kf5-kpackage, tracker-miners, xorg-x11-font-utils,
 libvirt-daemon-driver-vbox, PackageKit-command-not-found, OpenEXR-
 libs, libcom_err, libseccomp, double-conversion, pidgin-libnotify,
 ksysguardd, qca-qt5-ossl, icoutils, p11-kit, pcsc-lite-devel, libabw,
 gtkspell, libvirt-daemon-driver-storage-iscsi, libid3tag, libmodman,
 claws-mail-plugins-smime, telepathy-gabble, cfitsio, argyllcms,
 parted, gnome-disk-utility, kf5-kcontacts, libdvdread, zstd, claws-
 mail-plugins-python, kgreeter-plugins, bluez-libs, gnome-power-
 manager, avahi-gobject, libwebp, libxslt, libpeas, gnome-dictionary,
 boost-python, netty-tcnative, system-config-printer-udev, perl-Encode,
 elfutils, python2-cryptography, kf5-kdeclarative, libevdev, libgpg-
 error, lvm2-libs, libglvnd-glx, kf5-sonnet-core, libchromaprint, perl-
 Digest-SHA, perl-Params-Classify, libnfsidmap, libmicrohttpd,
 libsodium, uriparser, kf5-solid, sddm, libzstd, gtk-murrine-engine,
 liblognorm, wxBase, qemu-system-ppc-core, kf5-kpimtextedit, xdg-
 desktop-portal-gtk, lua-lpeg, symlinks, python3-crypto, kf5-pimcommon,
 libcdr, cdparanoia-libs, e2fsprogs-libs, pulseaudio-libs, claws-mail-
 plugins-attachwarner, libdwarf, ltrace, lcms2, docker-rhel-push-
 plugin, kcm_systemd, iprutils, qemu-guest-agent, ntfs-3g,
 python2-ldap, libxcb, freexl, kf5-kmailtransport-akonadi, libyubikey,
 gnome-photos, python3-pycurl, python3-brlapi, openconnect, xcb-util-
 keysyms, kmail-account-wizard, libreoffice-graphicfilter, liblastfm,
 m4, ktp-common-internals, xfce4-systemload-plugin, libgsystem, expat,
 libgphoto2, rubygem-unf_ext, libsavitar, cdparanoia, xcb-util, libwmf-
 lite, boost-fiber, libabiword, python3-PyQt4-webkit, pjproject,
 usbview, python3-coverage, kamera, kf5-kemoticons, dleyna-renderer,
 http-parser, qt5-qtspeech, pulseaudio-utils, perl-Sub-Identify,
 dolphin, kf5-kdelibs4support-libs, pyorbit, libeot, compat-
 wxGTK3-gtk2, systemd-bootchart, python3-sss, polyclipping, libdb-
 utils, perl-JSON-XS, kf5-kfilemetadata, perl-Ref-Util-XS,
 python3-scipy, perl-Time-Piece, dbusmenu-qt, qca-qt5, thunar-vfs,
 ncurses-libs, libidn2, virt-viewer, perl-Crypt-SSLeay, ldns,
 telepathy-qt5, thunar-volman, kf5-kmailtransport, gnome-color-manager,
 fcoe-utils, xorg-x11-xkb-utils, ibus-hangul, perl-IO-Tty,
 NetworkManager-openvpn, libxkbfile, hplip-libs, libwvstreams, kf5
 -kglobalaccel-libs, xmlrpc-c-client, cheese, libwpg, libwpd,
 libdc1394, libvirt-daemon-driver-qemu, digikam, mbedtls, galculator,
 perl-Time-HiRes, kf5-libgravatar, qemu-block-ssh, libwps, gssdp, cln,
 kf5-kdav, gnome-calendar, kf5-knotifications, libacl, claws-mail-
 plugins-spamassassin, xorg-x11-drv-ati, mpich, kf5-solid-libs, libSM,
 policycoreutils, qemu-block-iscsi, mcelog, abrt-plugin-bodhi,
 libgdiplus, libmusicbrainz5, pptp, perl-Digest-SHA1, sane-backends-
 drivers-sca

[Bug 1533472] Review Rename Request: webkit2gtk3 - GTK+ Web content engine library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533472



--- Comment #6 from Tomas Popela  ---
(In reply to Sergio Monteiro Basto from comment #5)
> yes webkit2gtk , maybe the correct name , also checked arch Linux [1]
> 
> - Look at this commit [2] internally is webkit2gtk-4.0 
> - When Gtk+ 4 [3] the same webkit2gtk IIRC should support the 2 gtk+ 3 and 4
> .
> 
> For these reasons, IMHO, seems to me webkit2gtk is more appropriate , or
> even webkit2gtk-4.0 (with - , to not confuse with gtk4) .
> 
> Best regards, 
> 
> [1]
> https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/webkit2gtk/
> 
> [2]
> https://github.com/hyperair/geany-plugins/commit/
> 1fd266a97b9fedb0ae463a2cf9a409af27bb0ae6 
> 
> [3]
> https://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/2016/06/13/gtk-4-0-is-not-gtk-4/ 
> https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/GTK%2B/Roadmap/GTK4

Could be, but from webkit2gtk you can't distinguish anything and we are on the
same boat as we are now before the rename. But with webkit2gtk3 you can clearly
distinguish on what WebKit and GTK+ versions it is based on.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1264630] Review Request: pymssql - A simple database interface to MS-SQL for Python

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264630

Carl George  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 CC||carl@george.computer
 Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
Last Closed||2018-01-11 09:27:45



--- Comment #2 from Carl George  ---
It seems this is already packaged.

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pymssql

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1531151] Review Request: python3-docker - A Python library for the Docker Engine API

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531151

Carl George  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Component|Package Review  |Package Review
Version|epel7   |rawhide
Product|Fedora EPEL |Fedora



--- Comment #1 from Carl George  ---
I changed the product to "Fedora EPEL" because in another review fedrepo-req
complained about it.  However, it appears changing that hides this review from
https://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html.  Changing it back for
now until it's reviewed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1531151] Review Request: python3-docker - A Python library for the Docker Engine API

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531151

Neal Gompa  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ngomp...@gmail.com



--- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa  ---
> This package is similar to the Fedora python-docker package, but is for 
> EPEL's Python 3 stack.  A separate SRPM is necessary due to conflicts with 
> python-docker-py in RHEL.

Is this really the case? You could set up the Fedora package to purge the
Python 2 subpackage for EPEL7 target (%if 0%{?rhel} && 0%{?epel})...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1487067] Review Request: Botan, a C++11 crypto and TLS library, version 2

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487067



--- Comment #18 from Benjamin Kircher  ---
Updated for new upstream 2.4.0 release.

New/updated files:

Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bkircher/botan2-fedora/master/botan2.spec

SRPM URL:
https://github.com/bkircher/botan2-fedora/raw/master/botan2-2.4.0-1.fc27.src.rpm

New Copr builds here: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/bkircher/botan2/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1533045] Review Request: rust-miniz-sys - Bindings to the miniz library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533045



--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-miniz-sys

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1533047] Review Request: rust-httparse - Tiny, safe, speedy, zero-copy HTTP/1.x parser

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533047



--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-httparse

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1533048] Review Request: rust-miniz_oxide - DEFLATE compression and decompression library rewritten in Rust based on miniz

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533048



--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-miniz_oxide

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532794] Review Request: libxcrypt - Extended crypt library for DES, MD5, Blowfish and others

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532794



--- Comment #9 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libxcrypt

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532207] Review Request: smc-tools - Shared Memory Communication Tools

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532207



--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/smc-tools. You may commit to the branch
"f27" in about 10 minutes.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532990] Review Request: ghc-cheapskate - Experimental markdown processor

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532990



--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ghc-cheapskate. You may commit to the branch
"f27" in about 10 minutes.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532993] Review Request: ghc-annotated-wl-pprint - The Wadler/ Leijen Pretty Printer, with annotation support

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532993



--- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ghc-annotated-wl-pprint. You may commit to
the branch "f27" in about 10 minutes.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1531288] Review Request: python3-gssapi - Python 3 Bindings for GSSAPI (RFC 2743/ 2744 and extensions)

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531288

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
python3-gssapi-1.3.0-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-9809cff157

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1533472] Review Rename Request: webkit2gtk3 - GTK+ Web content engine library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533472



--- Comment #7 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/webkit2gtk3

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532837] Review Request: python-uranium-lulzbot - A Python framework for building desktop applications

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532837



--- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-uranium-lulzbot

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1531151] Review Request: python3-docker - A Python library for the Docker Engine API

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531151



--- Comment #3 from Carl George  ---
The EPEL Python 3 proposal [1] (not sure if this was converted into guidelines
somewhere) specifically says that packages in RHEL get a new python3-
SRPM.  That said, the reason is conflicting SRPM names, and in this case since
the name changed from python-docker-py to python-docker in Fedora there would
be no conflict.

RHEL: python-docker-py -> python-docker-py
EPEL: python-docker -> python34-docker

While this seems technically possible, it doesn't really offer a strong enough
benefit to diverge from the norm.  Additionally, if RHEL later renames the
package then the SRPM conflict pops back up.  They already renamed it once from
docker-python to python-docker-py.

[1]: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bkabrda/EPEL7_Python3

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1533472] Review Rename Request: webkit2gtk3 - GTK+ Web content engine library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533472



--- Comment #8 from Sergio Monteiro Basto  ---
(In reply to Tomas Popela from comment #6)
> Could be, but from webkit2gtk you can't distinguish anything and we are on
> the same boat as we are now before the rename. But with webkit2gtk3 you can
> clearly distinguish on what WebKit and GTK+ versions it is based on.

OK

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1531151] Review Request: python3-docker - A Python library for the Docker Engine API

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531151

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||zebo...@gmail.com



--- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
 - Be a bit more specific in %files:

%{python3_sitelib}/%{srcname}
%{python3_sitelib}/%{srcname}-%{version}-py?.?.egginfo

 - Why don't you run the tests provided?



Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache (v2.0)". 109
 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/bob/packaging/review/python3-docker/review-
 python3-docker/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
 process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
 provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
 justified.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
 architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
 files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not pre

[Bug 1533490] Review Request: iucode-tool - iucode_tool is a program to manipulate microcode update collections for Intel i686 and X86-64 system processors , and prepare them for use by the Linux k

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533490

Patrick Uiterwijk  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|den...@ausil.us



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1533490] Review Request: iucode-tool - iucode_tool is a program to manipulate microcode update collections for Intel i686 and X86-64 system processors , and prepare them for use by the Linux k

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533490



--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/iucode-tool

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1533472] Review Rename Request: webkit2gtk3 - GTK+ Web content engine library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533472



--- Comment #9 from Michael Catanzaro  ---
I strongly recommend sticking with the name webkit2gtk3 to avoid confusion with
any future webkitgtk4 package. And we can drop the 2 in the middle in future
packages, since WebKit2 has been renamed to WebKit upstream, except in the GTK+
3 API where it's part of the API.

In the future, WebKitGTK+ for GTK+ 4 can just be called webkitgtk4. (What we
have now. Which is what has prompted this renaming.) And for GTK+ 5, we can
call it webkitgtk5.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1491281] Review Request: python-libsass - python bindings for libsass

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1491281



--- Comment #13 from Marcel Plch  ---
A new version is up.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1533490] Review Request: iucode-tool - iucode_tool is a program to manipulate microcode update collections for Intel i686 and X86-64 system processors , and prepare them for use by the Linux k

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533490



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
iucode-tool-2.2-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-612f127735

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1533490] Review Request: iucode-tool - iucode_tool is a program to manipulate microcode update collections for Intel i686 and X86-64 system processors , and prepare them for use by the Linux k

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533490

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1533490] Review Request: iucode-tool - iucode_tool is a program to manipulate microcode update collections for Intel i686 and X86-64 system processors , and prepare them for use by the Linux k

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533490



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
iucode-tool-2.2-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-f238807354

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1533490] Review Request: iucode-tool - iucode_tool is a program to manipulate microcode update collections for Intel i686 and X86-64 system processors , and prepare them for use by the Linux k

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533490



--- Comment #6 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
I disagree:

 - Use the correct tag to download the archive instead of "release_commit":

Source0:   
https://gitlab.com/iucode-tool/iucode-tool/repository/v2.2/archive.tar.gz#/%{name}-%{version}.tar.xz

 - Don't mix tabs and spaces, use one or the other:

iucode-tool.src:10: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line
10)

 - The "Summary:" must not exceed 80 characters:

iucode-tool.x86_64: E: summary-too-long C iucode_tool is a program to
manipulate microcode update collections for Intel i686 and X86-64 system
processors, and prepare them for use by the Linux kernel

 - The description should be split in multiples lines to stay below 80
characters per line:

iucode-tool.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long C iucode_tool is a program to
manipulate microcode update collections for Intel i686 and X86-64 system
processors, and prepare them for use by the Linux kernel.

 - Typo in the license field, it should be GPlv2+

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1531380] Review Request: perl-Path-Iter - Simple Efficient Path Iteration

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531380



--- Comment #10 from Ralf Corsepius  ---
(In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #8)
> Waiting. The requests are reviewed by a human being. Or you can complain on
> #fedora-releng FreeNode channel.

Well, what you say means this new UI just a bunch of usability regressions
without any advantages to the users, but to piss off contributors.

We once had a GUI, now we have a clumsy and widely dysfunctional CLI.

Who is the person, who is responsible for this mess? Life is too short to waste
time with this UI and is a manifestation of the disrespect RHAT exposes against
the community.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1531151] Review Request: python3-docker - A Python library for the Docker Engine API

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531151



--- Comment #5 from Carl George  ---
> - Be a bit more specific in %files:

Fixed locally, will be in my next spec file upload.

> - Why don't you run the tests provided?

Because python34-pytest is older than the minimum version in the Rawhide spec
file.  I'll see if I can get it to run anyways.

While looking into the pytest stuff I realized that python34-requests is only
at 2.12.3, but upstream requires 2.14.2 or higher.  I need to sort that out
before we proceed.  I can probably just patch setup.py to reduce that, but I
need test it first.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1533223] Review Request: rubygem-guard - Guard keeps an eye on your file modifications

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533223



--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-guard

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1491281] Review Request: python-libsass - python bindings for libsass

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1491281



--- Comment #14 from Marcel Plch  ---
Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Traceur759/python-libsass/master/python-libsass.spec
SRPM URL:
https://github.com/Traceur759/python-libsass/blob/master/python-libsass-0.13.4-1.fc26.src.rpm?raw=true

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1409204] Review Request: lirc - Spec file for latest version

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409204

Carl George  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 CC||carl@george.computer
 Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
Last Closed||2018-01-11 11:57:24



--- Comment #1 from Carl George  ---
lirc-0.10.0-3 is packaged already in EPEL7.  If there are still issues with it
file bugs for that package, not package reviews.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1491281] Review Request: python-libsass - python bindings for libsass

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1491281



--- Comment #15 from Miro Hrončok  ---
Posting URLs Fedora-Review can understand.

Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Traceur759/python-libsass/master/python-libsass.spec
SRPM URL:
https://github.com/Traceur759/python-libsass/raw/master/python-libsass-0.13.4-1.fc26.src.rpm";

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1531151] Review Request: python3-docker - A Python library for the Docker Engine API

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531151

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #6 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
Ok, package is approved.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1351707] Review Request: intel-cmt-cat - Software providing access to Intel (R) RDT technologies

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1351707

Carl George  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 CC||carl@george.computer
 Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
Last Closed||2018-01-11 12:01:52



--- Comment #3 from Carl George  ---
intel-cmt-cat-0.1.5-2.el7 is now in base RHEL, so it can't be in EPEL by
policy.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1477691] Review Request: monit - Manages and monitors processes, files, directories and devices

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477691

Carl George  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 CC||carl@george.computer
 Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
Last Closed||2018-01-11 12:05:50



--- Comment #2 from Carl George  ---
monit is already packaged for EPEL via branches in the main Fedora distgit repo
[1].  The latest upstream version 5.25.1 is available in epel-testing right now
[2][3].

[1]: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/monit
[2]: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/monit-5.25.1-1.el6
[3]: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/monit-5.25.1-1.el7

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1491281] Review Request: python-libsass - python bindings for libsass

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1491281



--- Comment #16 from Miro Hrončok  ---
I've got a build failure:

+ pushd docs
~/build/BUILD/libsass-python-0.13.4/docs ~/build/BUILD/libsass-python-0.13.4
++ python3 -c 'import sysconfig; print(sysconfig.get_platform())'
+ PLATFORM=linux-x86_64
+ export PYTHONPATH=../build/lib.linux-x86_64-3.6
+ PYTHONPATH=../build/lib.linux-x86_64-3.6
+ make man
sphinx-build -b man -d _build/doctrees   . _build/man
make: sphinx-build: Command not found
make: *** [Makefile:117: man] Error 127

You removed SPHINXBUILD=sphinx-build-3 in the last change, was there any
reason, or is it just a mistake?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1531955] Review Request: seqan2 - C++ library of efficient algorithms and data structures

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531955



--- Comment #11 from Antonio Trande  ---
(In reply to Alec Leamas from comment #10)
> Some follow-up from another box:
> 
> The bundled headers are iostream_bgzf.h, iostream_bzip2.h,
> iostream_bzip2_impl.h,  iostream_zip.h and iostream_zip_impl.h. I assume
> this is bundled code from
> https://www.codeproject.com/Articles/4457/zipstream-bzip-stream-iostream-
> wrappers-for-the-zl
> 
> As for licensing,  yy bad gut feeling about a single license is actually
> perfectly right. Reading the reference I see this: "If your package contains
> files which are under multiple, distinct, and independent licenses, then the
> spec must reflect this by using "and" as a separator"

It's right too; above all when you use different *incompatible* licenses.


Spec URL: https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/seqan2.spec
SRPM URL: 
https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/seqan2-2.4.0-0.1.20180103git8a875d.fc27.src.rpm

- Pre-released as seqan-2.4.0
- Add gcc-c++ BR
- Remove unnecessary R files
- Unbundle font-awesome
- Apps/libraries licensing commented

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1533048] Review Request: rust-miniz_oxide - DEFLATE compression and decompression library rewritten in Rust based on miniz

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533048

Igor Gnatenko  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2018-01-11 12:45:58



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1533047] Review Request: rust-httparse - Tiny, safe, speedy, zero-copy HTTP/1.x parser

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533047

Igor Gnatenko  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2018-01-11 12:45:51



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1533045] Review Request: rust-miniz-sys - Bindings to the miniz library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533045

Igor Gnatenko  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2018-01-11 12:45:47



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1533223] Review Request: rubygem-guard - Guard keeps an eye on your file modifications

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533223

Jaroslav Prokop  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||rubygem-guard-2.14.2-1.fc28
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2018-01-11 13:12:24



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1533223] Review Request: rubygem-guard - Guard keeps an eye on your file modifications

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533223

Vít Ondruch  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1526056




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1526056
[Bug 1526056] Review Request: rubygem-ascii_binder - An AsciiDoc-based
system for authoring and publishing documentation
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1526056] Review Request: rubygem-ascii_binder - An AsciiDoc-based system for authoring and publishing documentation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1526056

Vít Ondruch  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1533223



--- Comment #2 from Vít Ondruch  ---
I updated the guard package to the latest available version and since
rubygem-guard is about to lend in Fedora, I enabled that dependency, although
not sure how much it helps ...

Spec URL:
https://fedorapeople.org/cgit/vondruch/public_git/rubygem-ascii_binder.git/plain/rubygem-ascii_binder.spec?id=6b2a1926647286b7788b8358fc4cd47d2b44f5a4
SRPM URL:
http://people.redhat.com/vondruch/rubygem-ascii_binder-0.1.14-1.fc28.src.rpm


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533223
[Bug 1533223] Review Request: rubygem-guard - Guard keeps an eye on your
file modifications
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532082] Review Request: python-klusta - Spike detection and automatic clustering for spike sorting

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532082



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-klusta-3.0.16-2.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-6ccd915b6a

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532082] Review Request: python-klusta - Spike detection and automatic clustering for spike sorting

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532082

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532082] Review Request: python-klusta - Spike detection and automatic clustering for spike sorting

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532082



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-klusta-3.0.16-2.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-f6f388fbb1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1526056] Review Request: rubygem-ascii_binder - An AsciiDoc-based system for authoring and publishing documentation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1526056



--- Comment #3 from Vít Ondruch  ---
The "asciibinder watch" command is apparently still broken. If I comment out
the whole "/usr/share/gems/gems/ascii_binder-0.1.14/Guardfile" file content,
the error disappears and the shell is available. Would this help to anything?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532837] Review Request: python-uranium-lulzbot - A Python framework for building desktop applications

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532837

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532837] Review Request: python-uranium-lulzbot - A Python framework for building desktop applications

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532837



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
lulzbot-marlin-firmware-1.1.5.64-1.fc26 python-uranium-lulzbot-2.6.63-3.fc26
CuraEngine-lulzbot-2.6.63-1.fc26 cura-lulzbot-2.6.63-1.fc26 has been submitted
as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-c6fd0ee417

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532837] Review Request: python-uranium-lulzbot - A Python framework for building desktop applications

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532837



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
lulzbot-marlin-firmware-1.1.5.64-1.fc27 python-uranium-lulzbot-2.6.63-3.fc27
CuraEngine-lulzbot-2.6.63-1.fc27 cura-lulzbot-2.6.63-1.fc27 has been submitted
as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-3c9fddee81

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1531151] Review Request: python3-docker - A Python library for the Docker Engine API

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531151



--- Comment #7 from Carl George  ---
Confirmed that the test suite uses pytest.deprecated_call() as a context
manager, which wasn't added to pytest until 2.9.0 [1], so I won't be able to
enable that.  Still investigating the requests minimum version.

[1]:
https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/commit/beaa8e55bd6453a929c458570678c4d4b0d4bed3

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1529012] Review Request: js-jsroot - JavaScript ROOT

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1529012

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1529012] Review Request: js-jsroot - JavaScript ROOT

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1529012



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
js-jquery-mousewheel-3.1.13-1.el7 js-jsroot-5.3.4-2.el7 has been submitted as
an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-377ad5b245

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1526056] Review Request: rubygem-ascii_binder - An AsciiDoc-based system for authoring and publishing documentation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1526056

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||zebo...@gmail.com



--- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
BuildRequires: rubygem(trollop) >= 0.1.2

Should be 2.1.2

What's preventing you from packaging the missing deps?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1533012] Review Request: ghc-time-locale-compat - Compatibility of TimeLocale between old-locale and time-1.5

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533012

Jens Petersen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|MODIFIED
   Fixed In Version||ghc-time-locale-compat-0.1.
   ||1.3-8.fc28



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1533719] New: Review Request: twolame - Optimized MPEG Audio Layer 2 encoding library based on tooLAME

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533719

Bug ID: 1533719
   Summary: Review Request: twolame - Optimized MPEG Audio Layer 2
encoding library based on tooLAME
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: szts...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/zsun/test/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00700215-twolame/twolame.spec
SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/zsun/test/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00700215-twolame/twolame-0.3.13-8.fc28.src.rpm
Description: Optimized MPEG Audio Layer 2 encoding library based on tooLAME
Fedora Account System Username: zsun

Legal approval:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/le...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/DBZ3Q3XDAQF2KBTME5PXJPP4OZG6UEQT/

Since mp3 is now allowed in Fedora, I am moving the package from RPMFusion to
Fedora.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1531380] Review Request: perl-Path-Iter - Simple Efficient Path Iteration

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531380



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Path-Iter-0.2-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-40494a72f3

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1531380] Review Request: perl-Path-Iter - Simple Efficient Path Iteration

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531380



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Path-Iter-0.2-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-84434dcb8b

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1531380] Review Request: perl-Path-Iter - Simple Efficient Path Iteration

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531380

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1531380] Review Request: perl-Path-Iter - Simple Efficient Path Iteration

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531380



--- Comment #13 from Ralf Corsepius  ---
Apparently bodhi integration of this fedrepo crap also is broken.

Bodhi's package forms did not offer me the f26/f27 rpms. Instead, I had to
manually enter them.

Furthermore, as things appear to me
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/api/bugzilla is not being updated
anymore.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1533731] New: Review Request: ocaml-sedlex - Unicode-friendly lexer generator

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533731

Bug ID: 1533731
   Summary: Review Request: ocaml-sedlex - Unicode-friendly lexer
generator
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: a...@onthewings.net
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL:
https://gist.github.com/andyli/775c716c5050b51e02c664557289dcc4/raw/77a417e630a6aee70d66493b6fffa09ab75fea46/ocaml-sedlex.spec
SRPM URL:
https://gist.github.com/andyli/775c716c5050b51e02c664557289dcc4/raw/77a417e630a6aee70d66493b6fffa09ab75fea46/ocaml-sedlex-1.99.4-1.fc28.src.rpm
Description: Unicode-friendly lexer generator
Fedora Account System Username: andyli

This is a dependency of the next version of Haxe (v4.0.0).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1501992] Review Request: opam - Source-based package manager for OCaml

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501992



--- Comment #13 from Andy Li  ---
Ben, would you submit opam to f26 and f27 as well? I have a few packages that
want to be made available there.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1531380] Review Request: perl-Path-Iter - Simple Efficient Path Iteration

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531380



--- Comment #14 from Petr Pisar  ---
Since the official FAQ
 was started
by mprahl and the fedrepo-req package created by mprahl, I think he's
responsible for the implementation.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org