Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder
It always has had as far as I know. On 12 Feb 2014, at 6:52 pm, Robert Doc Wright godfea...@wrighthere.net wrote: Does studio recorder have stereo capabilities now? If we can't look at ourselves, and ask, why? then where does the learning start? - Original Message - From: Jamie Kelly otrja...@gmail.com To: 'PC Audio Discussion List' pc-audio@pc-audio.org Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 3:38 AM Subject: RE: Demo Of Studio Recorder I use both programs. SF is ideal if you are doing any audio restoration with old tapes and records whereas SR all the functions are very accessible out of the box and you just want straight recording/editing tools. SF works best with JFW scripts if you use Jaws. Jamie -Original Message- From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Dane Trethowan Sent: Tuesday, 11 February 2014 5:21 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder Firstly, its cheaper than Sound Forge Pro and its been designed with accessibility in mind thus has a full feature set which is entirely accessible. the manual is well laid out and easy to get to, I sent a link to that yesterday. Editing/navigating keystrokes are straight forward and easy to use, I haven't found out yet whether it handles Daisy recordings but I suspect it does given that Studio Recorder has a navigation menu which allows the navigation by sentence, paragraph etc. On 11 Feb 2014, at 5:13 pm, Alexandra Grünauer al.gruena...@gmx.de wrote: Hi Dane, Would you be so kind as to explain the advantages of Studio Recorder compaired to other audio programmes like Sound Forge? Thanks a lot! Alexandra - Original Message - From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 6:17 PM Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder At least all the functions work, I mean I can edit, record and so forth without any problems and as long as I keep the application open then I don't lose any of my work so its not a huge issue, just unexpected to see no Save As Dialogue box. Will be purchasing on Thursday. On 11 Feb 2014, at 3:57 am, Alexandra Grünauer al.gruena...@gmx.de wrote: or they could produce a full version that works for, say, thirty days. Alexandra - Original Message - From: Chris H christopher...@gmail.com To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 8:42 AM Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder Why not contact APH and let them know. Surely it's no harm allowing one to view a dialogue box but not be able to take action with it. Regards Chris On 10/02/2014 05:03, Dane Trethowan wrote: Hi! I'm using the demo of studio recorder, I plan to buy my own copy later in the month. I don't have any problems with a demo copy of a piece of software having limitations but some limitations in some pieces of software just go beynd the bounds of common sense. In Studio Recorder the exporting and saving of files is disabled, so far so good but the problem is that the Save As dialogue box is also disabled thus you have no idea what formats are available for you to export or save to unless you rummage through the Studio Recorder manual, a very bad oversight on behalf of the developers and perhaps this can be rectified in future demo editions of the Studio Recorder application. . ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954 ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954 ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954
Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder
It always has had stereo. -- Curtis Delzer. HS. K 6 V F O San Bernardino, CA. curtis1...@verizon.net skype: curtis1014 On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 00:52:42 -0700 Robert Doc Wright godfea...@wrighthere.net wrote: Does studio recorder have stereo capabilities now? If we can't look at ourselves, and ask, why? then where does the learning start? - Original Message - From: Jamie Kelly otrja...@gmail.com To: 'PC Audio Discussion List' pc-audio@pc-audio.org Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 3:38 AM Subject: RE: Demo Of Studio Recorder I use both programs. SF is ideal if you are doing any audio restoration with old tapes and records whereas SR all the functions are very accessible out of the box and you just want straight recording/editing tools. SF works best with JFW scripts if you use Jaws. Jamie -Original Message- From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Dane Trethowan Sent: Tuesday, 11 February 2014 5:21 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder Firstly, its cheaper than Sound Forge Pro and its been designed with accessibility in mind thus has a full feature set which is entirely accessible. the manual is well laid out and easy to get to, I sent a link to that yesterday. Editing/navigating keystrokes are straight forward and easy to use, I haven't found out yet whether it handles Daisy recordings but I suspect it does given that Studio Recorder has a navigation menu which allows the navigation by sentence, paragraph etc. On 11 Feb 2014, at 5:13 pm, Alexandra Grünauer al.gruena...@gmx.de wrote: Hi Dane, Would you be so kind as to explain the advantages of Studio Recorder compaired to other audio programmes like Sound Forge? Thanks a lot! Alexandra - Original Message - From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 6:17 PM Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder At least all the functions work, I mean I can edit, record and so forth without any problems and as long as I keep the application open then I don't lose any of my work so its not a huge issue, just unexpected to see no Save As Dialogue box. Will be purchasing on Thursday. On 11 Feb 2014, at 3:57 am, Alexandra Grünauer al.gruena...@gmx.de wrote: or they could produce a full version that works for, say, thirty days. Alexandra - Original Message - From: Chris H christopher...@gmail.com To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 8:42 AM Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder Why not contact APH and let them know. Surely it's no harm allowing one to view a dialogue box but not be able to take action with it. Regards Chris On 10/02/2014 05:03, Dane Trethowan wrote: Hi! I'm using the demo of studio recorder, I plan to buy my own copy later in the month. I don't have any problems with a demo copy of a piece of software having limitations but some limitations in some pieces of software just go beynd the bounds of common sense. In Studio Recorder the exporting and saving of files is disabled, so far so good but the problem is that the Save As dialogue box is also disabled thus you have no idea what formats are available for you to export or save to unless you rummage through the Studio Recorder manual, a very bad oversight on behalf of the developers and perhaps this can be rectified in future demo editions of the Studio Recorder application. . ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954 ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954
RE: Demo Of Studio Recorder
I use both programs. SF is ideal if you are doing any audio restoration with old tapes and records whereas SR all the functions are very accessible out of the box and you just want straight recording/editing tools. SF works best with JFW scripts if you use Jaws. Jamie -Original Message- From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Dane Trethowan Sent: Tuesday, 11 February 2014 5:21 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder Firstly, its cheaper than Sound Forge Pro and its been designed with accessibility in mind thus has a full feature set which is entirely accessible. the manual is well laid out and easy to get to, I sent a link to that yesterday. Editing/navigating keystrokes are straight forward and easy to use, I haven't found out yet whether it handles Daisy recordings but I suspect it does given that Studio Recorder has a navigation menu which allows the navigation by sentence, paragraph etc. On 11 Feb 2014, at 5:13 pm, Alexandra Grünauer al.gruena...@gmx.de wrote: Hi Dane, Would you be so kind as to explain the advantages of Studio Recorder compaired to other audio programmes like Sound Forge? Thanks a lot! Alexandra - Original Message - From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 6:17 PM Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder At least all the functions work, I mean I can edit, record and so forth without any problems and as long as I keep the application open then I don't lose any of my work so its not a huge issue, just unexpected to see no Save As Dialogue box. Will be purchasing on Thursday. On 11 Feb 2014, at 3:57 am, Alexandra Grünauer al.gruena...@gmx.de wrote: or they could produce a full version that works for, say, thirty days. Alexandra - Original Message - From: Chris H christopher...@gmail.com To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 8:42 AM Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder Why not contact APH and let them know. Surely it's no harm allowing one to view a dialogue box but not be able to take action with it. Regards Chris On 10/02/2014 05:03, Dane Trethowan wrote: Hi! I'm using the demo of studio recorder, I plan to buy my own copy later in the month. I don't have any problems with a demo copy of a piece of software having limitations but some limitations in some pieces of software just go beynd the bounds of common sense. In Studio Recorder the exporting and saving of files is disabled, so far so good but the problem is that the Save As dialogue box is also disabled thus you have no idea what formats are available for you to export or save to unless you rummage through the Studio Recorder manual, a very bad oversight on behalf of the developers and perhaps this can be rectified in future demo editions of the Studio Recorder application. . ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954 ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954
Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder
That's a very subjective comment regarding Sound Forge, I know people I work with who would have split and sore sides for a whole week if you told them that Sound Forge was an ideal piece of software for restoration work, they use something call StineBerg I think its called and they run a professional Audio/Video restoration business, according to them the Restoration plugins in SF are well over rated as is the software itself, again its a case of beauty being in the eye of the beholder. On 11 Feb 2014, at 9:38 pm, Jamie Kelly otrja...@gmail.com wrote: I use both programs. SF is ideal if you are doing any audio restoration with old tapes and records whereas SR all the functions are very accessible out of the box and you just want straight recording/editing tools. SF works best with JFW scripts if you use Jaws. Jamie -Original Message- From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Dane Trethowan Sent: Tuesday, 11 February 2014 5:21 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder Firstly, its cheaper than Sound Forge Pro and its been designed with accessibility in mind thus has a full feature set which is entirely accessible. the manual is well laid out and easy to get to, I sent a link to that yesterday. Editing/navigating keystrokes are straight forward and easy to use, I haven't found out yet whether it handles Daisy recordings but I suspect it does given that Studio Recorder has a navigation menu which allows the navigation by sentence, paragraph etc. On 11 Feb 2014, at 5:13 pm, Alexandra Grünauer al.gruena...@gmx.de wrote: Hi Dane, Would you be so kind as to explain the advantages of Studio Recorder compaired to other audio programmes like Sound Forge? Thanks a lot! Alexandra - Original Message - From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 6:17 PM Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder At least all the functions work, I mean I can edit, record and so forth without any problems and as long as I keep the application open then I don't lose any of my work so its not a huge issue, just unexpected to see no Save As Dialogue box. Will be purchasing on Thursday. On 11 Feb 2014, at 3:57 am, Alexandra Grünauer al.gruena...@gmx.de wrote: or they could produce a full version that works for, say, thirty days. Alexandra - Original Message - From: Chris H christopher...@gmail.com To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 8:42 AM Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder Why not contact APH and let them know. Surely it's no harm allowing one to view a dialogue box but not be able to take action with it. Regards Chris On 10/02/2014 05:03, Dane Trethowan wrote: Hi! I'm using the demo of studio recorder, I plan to buy my own copy later in the month. I don't have any problems with a demo copy of a piece of software having limitations but some limitations in some pieces of software just go beynd the bounds of common sense. In Studio Recorder the exporting and saving of files is disabled, so far so good but the problem is that the Save As dialogue box is also disabled thus you have no idea what formats are available for you to export or save to unless you rummage through the Studio Recorder manual, a very bad oversight on behalf of the developers and perhaps this can be rectified in future demo editions of the Studio Recorder application. . ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954 ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954 ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954
Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder
For us accessability is most important, so how does that Steinberg compare with the ideal keyboard access to SF. -Original Message- From: Dane Trethowan Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 9:41 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder That's a very subjective comment regarding Sound Forge, I know people I work with who would have split and sore sides for a whole week if you told them that Sound Forge was an ideal piece of software for restoration work, they use something call StineBerg I think its called and they run a professional Audio/Video restoration business, according to them the Restoration plugins in SF are well over rated as is the software itself, again its a case of beauty being in the eye of the beholder. On 11 Feb 2014, at 9:38 pm, Jamie Kelly otrja...@gmail.com wrote: I use both programs. SF is ideal if you are doing any audio restoration with old tapes and records whereas SR all the functions are very accessible out of the box and you just want straight recording/editing tools. SF works best with JFW scripts if you use Jaws. Jamie -Original Message- From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Dane Trethowan Sent: Tuesday, 11 February 2014 5:21 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder Firstly, its cheaper than Sound Forge Pro and its been designed with accessibility in mind thus has a full feature set which is entirely accessible. the manual is well laid out and easy to get to, I sent a link to that yesterday. Editing/navigating keystrokes are straight forward and easy to use, I haven't found out yet whether it handles Daisy recordings but I suspect it does given that Studio Recorder has a navigation menu which allows the navigation by sentence, paragraph etc. On 11 Feb 2014, at 5:13 pm, Alexandra Grünauer al.gruena...@gmx.de wrote: Hi Dane, Would you be so kind as to explain the advantages of Studio Recorder compaired to other audio programmes like Sound Forge? Thanks a lot! Alexandra - Original Message - From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 6:17 PM Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder At least all the functions work, I mean I can edit, record and so forth without any problems and as long as I keep the application open then I don't lose any of my work so its not a huge issue, just unexpected to see no Save As Dialogue box. Will be purchasing on Thursday. On 11 Feb 2014, at 3:57 am, Alexandra Grünauer al.gruena...@gmx.de wrote: or they could produce a full version that works for, say, thirty days. Alexandra - Original Message - From: Chris H christopher...@gmail.com To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 8:42 AM Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder Why not contact APH and let them know. Surely it's no harm allowing one to view a dialogue box but not be able to take action with it. Regards Chris On 10/02/2014 05:03, Dane Trethowan wrote: Hi! I'm using the demo of studio recorder, I plan to buy my own copy later in the month. I don't have any problems with a demo copy of a piece of software having limitations but some limitations in some pieces of software just go beynd the bounds of common sense. In Studio Recorder the exporting and saving of files is disabled, so far so good but the problem is that the Save As dialogue box is also disabled thus you have no idea what formats are available for you to export or save to unless you rummage through the Studio Recorder manual, a very bad oversight on behalf of the developers and perhaps this can be rectified in future demo editions of the Studio Recorder application. . ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954 ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954 ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954
RE: Demo Of Studio Recorder
NO, SF is far from perfect but for the price does a reasonable job on vinyl and 78 discs. Professionals or thoughs that can afford it use Ceda for records. Jamie -Original Message- From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Dane Trethowan Sent: Tuesday, 11 February 2014 9:42 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder That's a very subjective comment regarding Sound Forge, I know people I work with who would have split and sore sides for a whole week if you told them that Sound Forge was an ideal piece of software for restoration work, they use something call StineBerg I think its called and they run a professional Audio/Video restoration business, according to them the Restoration plugins in SF are well over rated as is the software itself, again its a case of beauty being in the eye of the beholder. On 11 Feb 2014, at 9:38 pm, Jamie Kelly otrja...@gmail.com wrote: I use both programs. SF is ideal if you are doing any audio restoration with old tapes and records whereas SR all the functions are very accessible out of the box and you just want straight recording/editing tools. SF works best with JFW scripts if you use Jaws. Jamie -Original Message- From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Dane Trethowan Sent: Tuesday, 11 February 2014 5:21 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder Firstly, its cheaper than Sound Forge Pro and its been designed with accessibility in mind thus has a full feature set which is entirely accessible. the manual is well laid out and easy to get to, I sent a link to that yesterday. Editing/navigating keystrokes are straight forward and easy to use, I haven't found out yet whether it handles Daisy recordings but I suspect it does given that Studio Recorder has a navigation menu which allows the navigation by sentence, paragraph etc. On 11 Feb 2014, at 5:13 pm, Alexandra Grünauer al.gruena...@gmx.de wrote: Hi Dane, Would you be so kind as to explain the advantages of Studio Recorder compaired to other audio programmes like Sound Forge? Thanks a lot! Alexandra - Original Message - From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 6:17 PM Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder At least all the functions work, I mean I can edit, record and so forth without any problems and as long as I keep the application open then I don't lose any of my work so its not a huge issue, just unexpected to see no Save As Dialogue box. Will be purchasing on Thursday. On 11 Feb 2014, at 3:57 am, Alexandra Grünauer al.gruena...@gmx.de wrote: or they could produce a full version that works for, say, thirty days. Alexandra - Original Message - From: Chris H christopher...@gmail.com To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 8:42 AM Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder Why not contact APH and let them know. Surely it's no harm allowing one to view a dialogue box but not be able to take action with it. Regards Chris On 10/02/2014 05:03, Dane Trethowan wrote: Hi! I'm using the demo of studio recorder, I plan to buy my own copy later in the month. I don't have any problems with a demo copy of a piece of software having limitations but some limitations in some pieces of software just go beynd the bounds of common sense. In Studio Recorder the exporting and saving of files is disabled, so far so good but the problem is that the Save As dialogue box is also disabled thus you have no idea what formats are available for you to export or save to unless you rummage through the Studio Recorder manual, a very bad oversight on behalf of the developers and perhaps this can be rectified in future demo editions of the Studio Recorder application. . ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954 ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954 ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954
Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder
If you say so smile, I don't do that sort of thing these days so perhaps improvements have been made, I use Amadeus Prog and I've had no trouble with that application, only cost $59 and I've been using it for 6 years, I'm just very sorry that a version - at this point in time at any rate - isn't available for Windows as the Amadeus Pro Swiss Army Knife Of Sund Editing offers exceptional value for money. I didn't really need to buy Studio Recorder to be perfectly honest, I already have my Mac which I do most of my editing on and I have other Windows editing solutions but the software did impress me I have to admit so I bought it. On 11 Feb 2014, at 9:51 pm, Jamie Kelly otrja...@gmail.com wrote: NO, SF is far from perfect but for the price does a reasonable job on vinyl and 78 discs. Professionals or thoughs that can afford it use Ceda for records. Jamie -Original Message- From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Dane Trethowan Sent: Tuesday, 11 February 2014 9:42 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder That's a very subjective comment regarding Sound Forge, I know people I work with who would have split and sore sides for a whole week if you told them that Sound Forge was an ideal piece of software for restoration work, they use something call StineBerg I think its called and they run a professional Audio/Video restoration business, according to them the Restoration plugins in SF are well over rated as is the software itself, again its a case of beauty being in the eye of the beholder. On 11 Feb 2014, at 9:38 pm, Jamie Kelly otrja...@gmail.com wrote: I use both programs. SF is ideal if you are doing any audio restoration with old tapes and records whereas SR all the functions are very accessible out of the box and you just want straight recording/editing tools. SF works best with JFW scripts if you use Jaws. Jamie -Original Message- From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Dane Trethowan Sent: Tuesday, 11 February 2014 5:21 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder Firstly, its cheaper than Sound Forge Pro and its been designed with accessibility in mind thus has a full feature set which is entirely accessible. the manual is well laid out and easy to get to, I sent a link to that yesterday. Editing/navigating keystrokes are straight forward and easy to use, I haven't found out yet whether it handles Daisy recordings but I suspect it does given that Studio Recorder has a navigation menu which allows the navigation by sentence, paragraph etc. On 11 Feb 2014, at 5:13 pm, Alexandra Grünauer al.gruena...@gmx.de wrote: Hi Dane, Would you be so kind as to explain the advantages of Studio Recorder compaired to other audio programmes like Sound Forge? Thanks a lot! Alexandra - Original Message - From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 6:17 PM Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder At least all the functions work, I mean I can edit, record and so forth without any problems and as long as I keep the application open then I don't lose any of my work so its not a huge issue, just unexpected to see no Save As Dialogue box. Will be purchasing on Thursday. On 11 Feb 2014, at 3:57 am, Alexandra Grünauer al.gruena...@gmx.de wrote: or they could produce a full version that works for, say, thirty days. Alexandra - Original Message - From: Chris H christopher...@gmail.com To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 8:42 AM Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder Why not contact APH and let them know. Surely it's no harm allowing one to view a dialogue box but not be able to take action with it. Regards Chris On 10/02/2014 05:03, Dane Trethowan wrote: Hi! I'm using the demo of studio recorder, I plan to buy my own copy later in the month. I don't have any problems with a demo copy of a piece of software having limitations but some limitations in some pieces of software just go beynd the bounds of common sense. In Studio Recorder the exporting and saving of files is disabled, so far so good but the problem is that the Save As dialogue box is also disabled thus you have no idea what formats are available for you to export or save to unless you rummage through the Studio Recorder manual, a very bad oversight on behalf of the developers and perhaps this can be rectified in future demo editions of the Studio Recorder application. . ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954 ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741
Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder
So accessibility is far more important than a good quality job, is that what your'e saying? On 11 Feb 2014, at 9:49 pm, Peter Scanlon sca...@tpg.com.au wrote: For us accessability is most important, so how does that Steinberg compare with the ideal keyboard access to SF. -Original Message- From: Dane Trethowan Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 9:41 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder That's a very subjective comment regarding Sound Forge, I know people I work with who would have split and sore sides for a whole week if you told them that Sound Forge was an ideal piece of software for restoration work, they use something call StineBerg I think its called and they run a professional Audio/Video restoration business, according to them the Restoration plugins in SF are well over rated as is the software itself, again its a case of beauty being in the eye of the beholder. On 11 Feb 2014, at 9:38 pm, Jamie Kelly otrja...@gmail.com wrote: I use both programs. SF is ideal if you are doing any audio restoration with old tapes and records whereas SR all the functions are very accessible out of the box and you just want straight recording/editing tools. SF works best with JFW scripts if you use Jaws. Jamie -Original Message- From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Dane Trethowan Sent: Tuesday, 11 February 2014 5:21 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder Firstly, its cheaper than Sound Forge Pro and its been designed with accessibility in mind thus has a full feature set which is entirely accessible. the manual is well laid out and easy to get to, I sent a link to that yesterday. Editing/navigating keystrokes are straight forward and easy to use, I haven't found out yet whether it handles Daisy recordings but I suspect it does given that Studio Recorder has a navigation menu which allows the navigation by sentence, paragraph etc. On 11 Feb 2014, at 5:13 pm, Alexandra Grünauer al.gruena...@gmx.de wrote: Hi Dane, Would you be so kind as to explain the advantages of Studio Recorder compaired to other audio programmes like Sound Forge? Thanks a lot! Alexandra - Original Message - From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 6:17 PM Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder At least all the functions work, I mean I can edit, record and so forth without any problems and as long as I keep the application open then I don't lose any of my work so its not a huge issue, just unexpected to see no Save As Dialogue box. Will be purchasing on Thursday. On 11 Feb 2014, at 3:57 am, Alexandra Grünauer al.gruena...@gmx.de wrote: or they could produce a full version that works for, say, thirty days. Alexandra - Original Message - From: Chris H christopher...@gmail.com To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 8:42 AM Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder Why not contact APH and let them know. Surely it's no harm allowing one to view a dialogue box but not be able to take action with it. Regards Chris On 10/02/2014 05:03, Dane Trethowan wrote: Hi! I'm using the demo of studio recorder, I plan to buy my own copy later in the month. I don't have any problems with a demo copy of a piece of software having limitations but some limitations in some pieces of software just go beynd the bounds of common sense. In Studio Recorder the exporting and saving of files is disabled, so far so good but the problem is that the Save As dialogue box is also disabled thus you have no idea what formats are available for you to export or save to unless you rummage through the Studio Recorder manual, a very bad oversight on behalf of the developers and perhaps this can be rectified in future demo editions of the Studio Recorder application. . ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954 ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954 ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954 ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954
Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder
It is very important, and if you can't perform the funcion easily, then it probaly more importrn iportant. -Original Message- From: Dane Trethowan Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 10:00 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder So accessibility is far more important than a good quality job, is that what your'e saying? On 11 Feb 2014, at 9:49 pm, Peter Scanlon sca...@tpg.com.au wrote: For us accessability is most important, so how does that Steinberg compare with the ideal keyboard access to SF. -Original Message- From: Dane Trethowan Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 9:41 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder That's a very subjective comment regarding Sound Forge, I know people I work with who would have split and sore sides for a whole week if you told them that Sound Forge was an ideal piece of software for restoration work, they use something call StineBerg I think its called and they run a professional Audio/Video restoration business, according to them the Restoration plugins in SF are well over rated as is the software itself, again its a case of beauty being in the eye of the beholder. On 11 Feb 2014, at 9:38 pm, Jamie Kelly otrja...@gmail.com wrote: I use both programs. SF is ideal if you are doing any audio restoration with old tapes and records whereas SR all the functions are very accessible out of the box and you just want straight recording/editing tools. SF works best with JFW scripts if you use Jaws. Jamie -Original Message- From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Dane Trethowan Sent: Tuesday, 11 February 2014 5:21 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder Firstly, its cheaper than Sound Forge Pro and its been designed with accessibility in mind thus has a full feature set which is entirely accessible. the manual is well laid out and easy to get to, I sent a link to that yesterday. Editing/navigating keystrokes are straight forward and easy to use, I haven't found out yet whether it handles Daisy recordings but I suspect it does given that Studio Recorder has a navigation menu which allows the navigation by sentence, paragraph etc. On 11 Feb 2014, at 5:13 pm, Alexandra Grünauer al.gruena...@gmx.de wrote: Hi Dane, Would you be so kind as to explain the advantages of Studio Recorder compaired to other audio programmes like Sound Forge? Thanks a lot! Alexandra - Original Message - From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 6:17 PM Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder At least all the functions work, I mean I can edit, record and so forth without any problems and as long as I keep the application open then I don't lose any of my work so its not a huge issue, just unexpected to see no Save As Dialogue box. Will be purchasing on Thursday. On 11 Feb 2014, at 3:57 am, Alexandra Grünauer al.gruena...@gmx.de wrote: or they could produce a full version that works for, say, thirty days. Alexandra - Original Message - From: Chris H christopher...@gmail.com To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 8:42 AM Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder Why not contact APH and let them know. Surely it's no harm allowing one to view a dialogue box but not be able to take action with it. Regards Chris On 10/02/2014 05:03, Dane Trethowan wrote: Hi! I'm using the demo of studio recorder, I plan to buy my own copy later in the month. I don't have any problems with a demo copy of a piece of software having limitations but some limitations in some pieces of software just go beynd the bounds of common sense. In Studio Recorder the exporting and saving of files is disabled, so far so good but the problem is that the Save As dialogue box is also disabled thus you have no idea what formats are available for you to export or save to unless you rummage through the Studio Recorder manual, a very bad oversight on behalf of the developers and perhaps this can be rectified in future demo editions of the Studio Recorder application. . ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954 ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954 ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954 ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954
Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder
I use wavelab by Steinberg and version 6 is barely accessible, but so much better than anything else that I use it. Versions beyond 6 were written with some kind of cross platform library which seems not to be accessible at all. It also requires a dongle to use it at all. Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net wrote: So accessibility is far more important than a good quality job, is that what your'e saying? On 11 Feb 2014, at 9:49 pm, Peter Scanlon sca...@tpg.com.au wrote: For us accessability is most important, so how does that Steinberg compare with the ideal keyboard access to SF. -Original Message- From: Dane Trethowan Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 9:41 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder That's a very subjective comment regarding Sound Forge, I know people I work with who would have split and sore sides for a whole week if you told them that Sound Forge was an ideal piece of software for restoration work, they use something call StineBerg I think its called and they run a professional Audio/Video restoration business, according to them the Restoration plugins in SF are well over rated as is the software itself, again its a case of beauty being in the eye of the beholder. On 11 Feb 2014, at 9:38 pm, Jamie Kelly otrja...@gmail.com wrote: I use both programs. SF is ideal if you are doing any audio restoration with old tapes and records whereas SR all the functions are very accessible out of the box and you just want straight recording/editing tools. SF works best with JFW scripts if you use Jaws. Jamie -Original Message- From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Dane Trethowan Sent: Tuesday, 11 February 2014 5:21 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder Firstly, its cheaper than Sound Forge Pro and its been designed with accessibility in mind thus has a full feature set which is entirely accessible. the manual is well laid out and easy to get to, I sent a link to that yesterday. Editing/navigating keystrokes are straight forward and easy to use, I haven't found out yet whether it handles Daisy recordings but I suspect it does given that Studio Recorder has a navigation menu which allows the navigation by sentence, paragraph etc. On 11 Feb 2014, at 5:13 pm, Alexandra Grünauer al.gruena...@gmx.de wrote: Hi Dane, Would you be so kind as to explain the advantages of Studio Recorder compaired to other audio programmes like Sound Forge? Thanks a lot! Alexandra - Original Message - From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 6:17 PM Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder At least all the functions work, I mean I can edit, record and so forth without any problems and as long as I keep the application open then I don't lose any of my work so its not a huge issue, just unexpected to see no Save As Dialogue box. Will be purchasing on Thursday. On 11 Feb 2014, at 3:57 am, Alexandra Grünauer al.gruena...@gmx.de wrote: or they could produce a full version that works for, say, thirty days. Alexandra - Original Message - From: Chris H christopher...@gmail.com To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 8:42 AM Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder Why not contact APH and let them know. Surely it's no harm allowing one to view a dialogue box but not be able to take action with it. Regards Chris On 10/02/2014 05:03, Dane Trethowan wrote: Hi! I'm using the demo of studio recorder, I plan to buy my own copy later in the month. I don't have any problems with a demo copy of a piece of software having limitations but some limitations in some pieces of software just go beynd the bounds of common sense. In Studio Recorder the exporting and saving of files is disabled, so far so good but the problem is that the Save As dialogue box is also disabled thus you have no idea what formats are available for you to export or save to unless you rummage through the Studio Recorder manual, a very bad oversight on behalf of the developers and perhaps this can be rectified in future demo editions of the Studio Recorder application. . ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954 ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954 ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone
Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder
Interesting, I'll pass this along as I know others will be most interested in your comments and thanks for contributing this information. On 11 Feb 2014, at 10:15 pm, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: I use wavelab by Steinberg and version 6 is barely accessible, but so much better than anything else that I use it. Versions beyond 6 were written with some kind of cross platform library which seems not to be accessible at all. It also requires a dongle to use it at all. Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net wrote: So accessibility is far more important than a good quality job, is that what your'e saying? On 11 Feb 2014, at 9:49 pm, Peter Scanlon sca...@tpg.com.au wrote: For us accessability is most important, so how does that Steinberg compare with the ideal keyboard access to SF. -Original Message- From: Dane Trethowan Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 9:41 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder That's a very subjective comment regarding Sound Forge, I know people I work with who would have split and sore sides for a whole week if you told them that Sound Forge was an ideal piece of software for restoration work, they use something call StineBerg I think its called and they run a professional Audio/Video restoration business, according to them the Restoration plugins in SF are well over rated as is the software itself, again its a case of beauty being in the eye of the beholder. On 11 Feb 2014, at 9:38 pm, Jamie Kelly otrja...@gmail.com wrote: I use both programs. SF is ideal if you are doing any audio restoration with old tapes and records whereas SR all the functions are very accessible out of the box and you just want straight recording/editing tools. SF works best with JFW scripts if you use Jaws. Jamie -Original Message- From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Dane Trethowan Sent: Tuesday, 11 February 2014 5:21 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder Firstly, its cheaper than Sound Forge Pro and its been designed with accessibility in mind thus has a full feature set which is entirely accessible. the manual is well laid out and easy to get to, I sent a link to that yesterday. Editing/navigating keystrokes are straight forward and easy to use, I haven't found out yet whether it handles Daisy recordings but I suspect it does given that Studio Recorder has a navigation menu which allows the navigation by sentence, paragraph etc. On 11 Feb 2014, at 5:13 pm, Alexandra Grünauer al.gruena...@gmx.de wrote: Hi Dane, Would you be so kind as to explain the advantages of Studio Recorder compaired to other audio programmes like Sound Forge? Thanks a lot! Alexandra - Original Message - From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 6:17 PM Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder At least all the functions work, I mean I can edit, record and so forth without any problems and as long as I keep the application open then I don't lose any of my work so its not a huge issue, just unexpected to see no Save As Dialogue box. Will be purchasing on Thursday. On 11 Feb 2014, at 3:57 am, Alexandra Grünauer al.gruena...@gmx.de wrote: or they could produce a full version that works for, say, thirty days. Alexandra - Original Message - From: Chris H christopher...@gmail.com To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 8:42 AM Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder Why not contact APH and let them know. Surely it's no harm allowing one to view a dialogue box but not be able to take action with it. Regards Chris On 10/02/2014 05:03, Dane Trethowan wrote: Hi! I'm using the demo of studio recorder, I plan to buy my own copy later in the month. I don't have any problems with a demo copy of a piece of software having limitations but some limitations in some pieces of software just go beynd the bounds of common sense. In Studio Recorder the exporting and saving of files is disabled, so far so good but the problem is that the Save As dialogue box is also disabled thus you have no idea what formats are available for you to export or save to unless you rummage through the Studio Recorder manual, a very bad oversight on behalf of the developers and perhaps this can be rectified in future demo editions of the Studio Recorder application. . ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954 ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954 ** Dane Trethowan
Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder
Interesting, I've just looked Wavelab up with Google, can't find a purchase price right at the moment, I notice there's a Mac OSX version so my attention has been drawn to that. On 11 Feb 2014, at 10:15 pm, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: I use wavelab by Steinberg and version 6 is barely accessible, but so much better than anything else that I use it. Versions beyond 6 were written with some kind of cross platform library which seems not to be accessible at all. It also requires a dongle to use it at all. Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net wrote: So accessibility is far more important than a good quality job, is that what your'e saying? On 11 Feb 2014, at 9:49 pm, Peter Scanlon sca...@tpg.com.au wrote: For us accessability is most important, so how does that Steinberg compare with the ideal keyboard access to SF. -Original Message- From: Dane Trethowan Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 9:41 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder That's a very subjective comment regarding Sound Forge, I know people I work with who would have split and sore sides for a whole week if you told them that Sound Forge was an ideal piece of software for restoration work, they use something call StineBerg I think its called and they run a professional Audio/Video restoration business, according to them the Restoration plugins in SF are well over rated as is the software itself, again its a case of beauty being in the eye of the beholder. On 11 Feb 2014, at 9:38 pm, Jamie Kelly otrja...@gmail.com wrote: I use both programs. SF is ideal if you are doing any audio restoration with old tapes and records whereas SR all the functions are very accessible out of the box and you just want straight recording/editing tools. SF works best with JFW scripts if you use Jaws. Jamie -Original Message- From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Dane Trethowan Sent: Tuesday, 11 February 2014 5:21 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder Firstly, its cheaper than Sound Forge Pro and its been designed with accessibility in mind thus has a full feature set which is entirely accessible. the manual is well laid out and easy to get to, I sent a link to that yesterday. Editing/navigating keystrokes are straight forward and easy to use, I haven't found out yet whether it handles Daisy recordings but I suspect it does given that Studio Recorder has a navigation menu which allows the navigation by sentence, paragraph etc. On 11 Feb 2014, at 5:13 pm, Alexandra Grünauer al.gruena...@gmx.de wrote: Hi Dane, Would you be so kind as to explain the advantages of Studio Recorder compaired to other audio programmes like Sound Forge? Thanks a lot! Alexandra - Original Message - From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 6:17 PM Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder At least all the functions work, I mean I can edit, record and so forth without any problems and as long as I keep the application open then I don't lose any of my work so its not a huge issue, just unexpected to see no Save As Dialogue box. Will be purchasing on Thursday. On 11 Feb 2014, at 3:57 am, Alexandra Grünauer al.gruena...@gmx.de wrote: or they could produce a full version that works for, say, thirty days. Alexandra - Original Message - From: Chris H christopher...@gmail.com To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 8:42 AM Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder Why not contact APH and let them know. Surely it's no harm allowing one to view a dialogue box but not be able to take action with it. Regards Chris On 10/02/2014 05:03, Dane Trethowan wrote: Hi! I'm using the demo of studio recorder, I plan to buy my own copy later in the month. I don't have any problems with a demo copy of a piece of software having limitations but some limitations in some pieces of software just go beynd the bounds of common sense. In Studio Recorder the exporting and saving of files is disabled, so far so good but the problem is that the Save As dialogue box is also disabled thus you have no idea what formats are available for you to export or save to unless you rummage through the Studio Recorder manual, a very bad oversight on behalf of the developers and perhaps this can be rectified in future demo editions of the Studio Recorder application. . ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954 ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954
Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder
Its about $4-500 new -- I bought it many years ago and kept upgrading the thing. Version 6 first started the dongle and version 7 and onward is available for both Windows and the Mac. I tried version 8 on Windows 8 briefly, but got no place at all, and now I am not allowed to try the Mac one. Even the upgrade price is $200 or thereabouts. Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net wrote: Interesting, I've just looked Wavelab up with Google, can't find a purchase price right at the moment, I notice there's a Mac OSX version so my attention has been drawn to that. On 11 Feb 2014, at 10:15 pm, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: I use wavelab by Steinberg and version 6 is barely accessible, but so much better than anything else that I use it. Versions beyond 6 were written with some kind of cross platform library which seems not to be accessible at all. It also requires a dongle to use it at all. Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net wrote: So accessibility is far more important than a good quality job, is that what your'e saying? On 11 Feb 2014, at 9:49 pm, Peter Scanlon sca...@tpg.com.au wrote: For us accessability is most important, so how does that Steinberg compare with the ideal keyboard access to SF. -Original Message- From: Dane Trethowan Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 9:41 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder That's a very subjective comment regarding Sound Forge, I know people I work with who would have split and sore sides for a whole week if you told them that Sound Forge was an ideal piece of software for restoration work, they use something call StineBerg I think its called and they run a professional Audio/Video restoration business, according to them the Restoration plugins in SF are well over rated as is the software itself, again its a case of beauty being in the eye of the beholder. On 11 Feb 2014, at 9:38 pm, Jamie Kelly otrja...@gmail.com wrote: I use both programs. SF is ideal if you are doing any audio restoration with old tapes and records whereas SR all the functions are very accessible out of the box and you just want straight recording/editing tools. SF works best with JFW scripts if you use Jaws. Jamie -Original Message- From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Dane Trethowan Sent: Tuesday, 11 February 2014 5:21 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder Firstly, its cheaper than Sound Forge Pro and its been designed with accessibility in mind thus has a full feature set which is entirely accessible. the manual is well laid out and easy to get to, I sent a link to that yesterday. Editing/navigating keystrokes are straight forward and easy to use, I haven't found out yet whether it handles Daisy recordings but I suspect it does given that Studio Recorder has a navigation menu which allows the navigation by sentence, paragraph etc. On 11 Feb 2014, at 5:13 pm, Alexandra Grünauer al.gruena...@gmx.de wrote: Hi Dane, Would you be so kind as to explain the advantages of Studio Recorder compaired to other audio programmes like Sound Forge? Thanks a lot! Alexandra - Original Message - From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 6:17 PM Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder At least all the functions work, I mean I can edit, record and so forth without any problems and as long as I keep the application open then I don't lose any of my work so its not a huge issue, just unexpected to see no Save As Dialogue box. Will be purchasing on Thursday. On 11 Feb 2014, at 3:57 am, Alexandra Grünauer al.gruena...@gmx.de wrote: or they could produce a full version that works for, say, thirty days. Alexandra - Original Message - From: Chris H christopher...@gmail.com To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 8:42 AM Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder Why not contact APH and let them know. Surely it's no harm allowing one to view a dialogue box but not be able to take action with it. Regards Chris On 10/02/2014 05:03, Dane Trethowan wrote: Hi! I'm using the demo of studio recorder, I plan to buy my own copy later in the month. I don't have any problems with a demo copy of a piece of software having limitations but some limitations in some pieces of software just go beynd the bounds of common sense. In Studio Recorder the exporting and saving of files is disabled, so far so good but the problem is that the Save As dialogue box is also disabled thus you have no idea what formats are available for you to export or save to unless you rummage through the Studio
Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder
thanks, people speak very highly of the company, how did you find the software? On 11 Feb 2014, at 11:02 pm, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: Its about $4-500 new -- I bought it many years ago and kept upgrading the thing. Version 6 first started the dongle and version 7 and onward is available for both Windows and the Mac. I tried version 8 on Windows 8 briefly, but got no place at all, and now I am not allowed to try the Mac one. Even the upgrade price is $200 or thereabouts. Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net wrote: Interesting, I've just looked Wavelab up with Google, can't find a purchase price right at the moment, I notice there's a Mac OSX version so my attention has been drawn to that. On 11 Feb 2014, at 10:15 pm, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: I use wavelab by Steinberg and version 6 is barely accessible, but so much better than anything else that I use it. Versions beyond 6 were written with some kind of cross platform library which seems not to be accessible at all. It also requires a dongle to use it at all. Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net wrote: So accessibility is far more important than a good quality job, is that what your'e saying? On 11 Feb 2014, at 9:49 pm, Peter Scanlon sca...@tpg.com.au wrote: For us accessability is most important, so how does that Steinberg compare with the ideal keyboard access to SF. -Original Message- From: Dane Trethowan Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 9:41 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder That's a very subjective comment regarding Sound Forge, I know people I work with who would have split and sore sides for a whole week if you told them that Sound Forge was an ideal piece of software for restoration work, they use something call StineBerg I think its called and they run a professional Audio/Video restoration business, according to them the Restoration plugins in SF are well over rated as is the software itself, again its a case of beauty being in the eye of the beholder. On 11 Feb 2014, at 9:38 pm, Jamie Kelly otrja...@gmail.com wrote: I use both programs. SF is ideal if you are doing any audio restoration with old tapes and records whereas SR all the functions are very accessible out of the box and you just want straight recording/editing tools. SF works best with JFW scripts if you use Jaws. Jamie -Original Message- From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Dane Trethowan Sent: Tuesday, 11 February 2014 5:21 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder Firstly, its cheaper than Sound Forge Pro and its been designed with accessibility in mind thus has a full feature set which is entirely accessible. the manual is well laid out and easy to get to, I sent a link to that yesterday. Editing/navigating keystrokes are straight forward and easy to use, I haven't found out yet whether it handles Daisy recordings but I suspect it does given that Studio Recorder has a navigation menu which allows the navigation by sentence, paragraph etc. On 11 Feb 2014, at 5:13 pm, Alexandra Grünauer al.gruena...@gmx.de wrote: Hi Dane, Would you be so kind as to explain the advantages of Studio Recorder compaired to other audio programmes like Sound Forge? Thanks a lot! Alexandra - Original Message - From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 6:17 PM Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder At least all the functions work, I mean I can edit, record and so forth without any problems and as long as I keep the application open then I don't lose any of my work so its not a huge issue, just unexpected to see no Save As Dialogue box. Will be purchasing on Thursday. On 11 Feb 2014, at 3:57 am, Alexandra Grünauer al.gruena...@gmx.de wrote: or they could produce a full version that works for, say, thirty days. Alexandra - Original Message - From: Chris H christopher...@gmail.com To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 8:42 AM Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder Why not contact APH and let them know. Surely it's no harm allowing one to view a dialogue box but not be able to take action with it. Regards Chris On 10/02/2014 05:03, Dane Trethowan wrote: Hi! I'm using the demo of studio recorder, I plan to buy my own copy later in the month. I don't have any problems with a demo copy of a piece of software having limitations but some limitations in some pieces of software just go beynd the bounds of common sense. In Studio Recorder the exporting and saving of files is disabled, so far so good but the problem is that the Save As dialogue box is also disabled thus you have no idea what formats are available for you to export or save to unless you rummage
Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder
It was so long ago, I can't remember -- it must have been 10-15 years ago. I hate the dongle business, however and the accessibility is strange -- I think they have their own keyboard driver which interferes very much. I had to use a very different WindowEyes set file to avoid conflicts. Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net wrote: thanks, people speak very highly of the company, how did you find the software? On 11 Feb 2014, at 11:02 pm, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: Its about $4-500 new -- I bought it many years ago and kept upgrading the thing. Version 6 first started the dongle and version 7 and onward is available for both Windows and the Mac. I tried version 8 on Windows 8 briefly, but got no place at all, and now I am not allowed to try the Mac one. Even the upgrade price is $200 or thereabouts. Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net wrote: Interesting, I've just looked Wavelab up with Google, can't find a purchase price right at the moment, I notice there's a Mac OSX version so my attention has been drawn to that. On 11 Feb 2014, at 10:15 pm, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: I use wavelab by Steinberg and version 6 is barely accessible, but so much better than anything else that I use it. Versions beyond 6 were written with some kind of cross platform library which seems not to be accessible at all. It also requires a dongle to use it at all. Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net wrote: So accessibility is far more important than a good quality job, is that what your'e saying? On 11 Feb 2014, at 9:49 pm, Peter Scanlon sca...@tpg.com.au wrote: For us accessability is most important, so how does that Steinberg compare with the ideal keyboard access to SF. -Original Message- From: Dane Trethowan Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 9:41 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder That's a very subjective comment regarding Sound Forge, I know people I work with who would have split and sore sides for a whole week if you told them that Sound Forge was an ideal piece of software for restoration work, they use something call StineBerg I think its called and they run a professional Audio/Video restoration business, according to them the Restoration plugins in SF are well over rated as is the software itself, again its a case of beauty being in the eye of the beholder. On 11 Feb 2014, at 9:38 pm, Jamie Kelly otrja...@gmail.com wrote: I use both programs. SF is ideal if you are doing any audio restoration with old tapes and records whereas SR all the functions are very accessible out of the box and you just want straight recording/editing tools. SF works best with JFW scripts if you use Jaws. Jamie -Original Message- From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Dane Trethowan Sent: Tuesday, 11 February 2014 5:21 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder Firstly, its cheaper than Sound Forge Pro and its been designed with accessibility in mind thus has a full feature set which is entirely accessible. the manual is well laid out and easy to get to, I sent a link to that yesterday. Editing/navigating keystrokes are straight forward and easy to use, I haven't found out yet whether it handles Daisy recordings but I suspect it does given that Studio Recorder has a navigation menu which allows the navigation by sentence, paragraph etc. On 11 Feb 2014, at 5:13 pm, Alexandra Grünauer al.gruena...@gmx.de wrote: Hi Dane, Would you be so kind as to explain the advantages of Studio Recorder compaired to other audio programmes like Sound Forge? Thanks a lot! Alexandra - Original Message - From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 6:17 PM Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder At least all the functions work, I mean I can edit, record and so forth without any problems and as long as I keep the application open then I don't lose any of my work so its not a huge issue, just unexpected to see no Save As Dialogue box. Will be purchasing on Thursday. On 11 Feb 2014, at 3:57 am, Alexandra Grünauer al.gruena...@gmx.de wrote: or they could produce a full version that works for, say, thirty days. Alexandra - Original Message - From: Chris H christopher...@gmail.com To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 8:42 AM Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder Why not contact APH and let them know. Surely it's no harm allowing one to view a dialogue box but not be able to take action with it. Regards Chris On 10/02/2014 05:03, Dane Trethowan wrote: Hi! I'm using the demo of studio
Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder
You can make *.mp3 files, or *.wav files. It is very speech friendly, including peak audible signaling, many ways to maintain correct audio levels, phrase detection for speech as well as two other adjustable parameters for pauses, punch-in or inserting recording with a single button, and much else. I don't understand why they inhibited all saving of recording with the demo version, seems they could have limited the time available to save. The cost is $200.
Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder
SR does not as such make daisy recordings, but it correctly does the heading levels 1 through 10 where daisy goes up to level 6, and the program which makes daisy books, Book Wizard Producer handles the levels from studio recorder and makes them headings for all the levels you wish. -- Curtis Delzer. HS. K 6 V F O San Bernardino, CA. curtis1...@verizon.net skype: curtis1014 On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 17:21:14 +1100 Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net wrote: Firstly, its cheaper than Sound Forge Pro and its been designed with accessibility in mind thus has a full feature set which is entirely accessible. the manual is well laid out and easy to get to, I sent a link to that yesterday. Editing/navigating keystrokes are straight forward and easy to use, I haven't found out yet whether it handles Daisy recordings but I suspect it does given that Studio Recorder has a navigation menu which allows the navigation by sentence, paragraph etc. On 11 Feb 2014, at 5:13 pm, Alexandra Grünauer al.gruena...@gmx.de wrote: Hi Dane, Would you be so kind as to explain the advantages of Studio Recorder compaired to other audio programmes like Sound Forge? Thanks a lot! Alexandra - Original Message - From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 6:17 PM Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder At least all the functions work, I mean I can edit, record and so forth without any problems and as long as I keep the application open then I don't lose any of my work so its not a huge issue, just unexpected to see no Save As Dialogue box. Will be purchasing on Thursday. On 11 Feb 2014, at 3:57 am, Alexandra Grünauer al.gruena...@gmx.de wrote: or they could produce a full version that works for, say, thirty days. Alexandra - Original Message - From: Chris H christopher...@gmail.com To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 8:42 AM Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder Why not contact APH and let them know. Surely it's no harm allowing one to view a dialogue box but not be able to take action with it. Regards Chris On 10/02/2014 05:03, Dane Trethowan wrote: Hi! I'm using the demo of studio recorder, I plan to buy my own copy later in the month. I don't have any problems with a demo copy of a piece of software having limitations but some limitations in some pieces of software just go beynd the bounds of common sense. In Studio Recorder the exporting and saving of files is disabled, so far so good but the problem is that the Save As dialogue box is also disabled thus you have no idea what formats are available for you to export or save to unless you rummage through the Studio Recorder manual, a very bad oversight on behalf of the developers and perhaps this can be rectified in future demo editions of the Studio Recorder application. . ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954 ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954
Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder
where can you get studio recorder from? also does sound fordge come with the plug ins it u by the full vertion? from stewart ross - Original Message - From: Curtis Delzer curtis1...@verizon.net To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 5:45 PM Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder You can make *.mp3 files, or *.wav files. It is very speech friendly, including peak audible signaling, many ways to maintain correct audio levels, phrase detection for speech as well as two other adjustable parameters for pauses, punch-in or inserting recording with a single button, and much else. I don't understand why they inhibited all saving of recording with the demo version, seems they could have limited the time available to save. The cost is $200.
Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder
studio recorder is available VIA APH. -- Curtis Delzer. HS. K 6 V F O San Bernardino, CA. curtis1...@verizon.net skype: curtis1014 On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 17:55:49 + stewart ross stewartr...@sky.com wrote: where can you get studio recorder from? also does sound fordge come with the plug ins it u by the full vertion? from stewart ross - Original Message - From: Curtis Delzer curtis1...@verizon.net To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 5:45 PM Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder You can make *.mp3 files, or *.wav files. It is very speech friendly, including peak audible signaling, many ways to maintain correct audio levels, phrase detection for speech as well as two other adjustable parameters for pauses, punch-in or inserting recording with a single button, and much else. I don't understand why they inhibited all saving of recording with the demo version, seems they could have limited the time available to save. The cost is $200.
Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder
Thanks everyone for all the interesting information. Alexandra - Original Message - From: Curtis Delzer curtis1...@verizon.net To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 6:48 PM Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder SR does not as such make daisy recordings, but it correctly does the heading levels 1 through 10 where daisy goes up to level 6, and the program which makes daisy books, Book Wizard Producer handles the levels from studio recorder and makes them headings for all the levels you wish. -- Curtis Delzer. HS. K 6 V F O San Bernardino, CA. curtis1...@verizon.net skype: curtis1014 On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 17:21:14 +1100 Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net wrote: Firstly, its cheaper than Sound Forge Pro and its been designed with accessibility in mind thus has a full feature set which is entirely accessible. the manual is well laid out and easy to get to, I sent a link to that yesterday. Editing/navigating keystrokes are straight forward and easy to use, I haven't found out yet whether it handles Daisy recordings but I suspect it does given that Studio Recorder has a navigation menu which allows the navigation by sentence, paragraph etc. On 11 Feb 2014, at 5:13 pm, Alexandra Grünauer al.gruena...@gmx.de wrote: Hi Dane, Would you be so kind as to explain the advantages of Studio Recorder compaired to other audio programmes like Sound Forge? Thanks a lot! Alexandra - Original Message - From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 6:17 PM Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder At least all the functions work, I mean I can edit, record and so forth without any problems and as long as I keep the application open then I don't lose any of my work so its not a huge issue, just unexpected to see no Save As Dialogue box. Will be purchasing on Thursday. On 11 Feb 2014, at 3:57 am, Alexandra Grünauer al.gruena...@gmx.de wrote: or they could produce a full version that works for, say, thirty days. Alexandra - Original Message - From: Chris H christopher...@gmail.com To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 8:42 AM Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder Why not contact APH and let them know. Surely it's no harm allowing one to view a dialogue box but not be able to take action with it. Regards Chris On 10/02/2014 05:03, Dane Trethowan wrote: Hi! I'm using the demo of studio recorder, I plan to buy my own copy later in the month. I don't have any problems with a demo copy of a piece of software having limitations but some limitations in some pieces of software just go beynd the bounds of common sense. In Studio Recorder the exporting and saving of files is disabled, so far so good but the problem is that the Save As dialogue box is also disabled thus you have no idea what formats are available for you to export or save to unless you rummage through the Studio Recorder manual, a very bad oversight on behalf of the developers and perhaps this can be rectified in future demo editions of the Studio Recorder application. . ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954 ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954
Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder
Does studio recorder have stereo capabilities now? If we can't look at ourselves, and ask, why? then where does the learning start? - Original Message - From: Jamie Kelly otrja...@gmail.com To: 'PC Audio Discussion List' pc-audio@pc-audio.org Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 3:38 AM Subject: RE: Demo Of Studio Recorder I use both programs. SF is ideal if you are doing any audio restoration with old tapes and records whereas SR all the functions are very accessible out of the box and you just want straight recording/editing tools. SF works best with JFW scripts if you use Jaws. Jamie -Original Message- From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Dane Trethowan Sent: Tuesday, 11 February 2014 5:21 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder Firstly, its cheaper than Sound Forge Pro and its been designed with accessibility in mind thus has a full feature set which is entirely accessible. the manual is well laid out and easy to get to, I sent a link to that yesterday. Editing/navigating keystrokes are straight forward and easy to use, I haven't found out yet whether it handles Daisy recordings but I suspect it does given that Studio Recorder has a navigation menu which allows the navigation by sentence, paragraph etc. On 11 Feb 2014, at 5:13 pm, Alexandra Grünauer al.gruena...@gmx.de wrote: Hi Dane, Would you be so kind as to explain the advantages of Studio Recorder compaired to other audio programmes like Sound Forge? Thanks a lot! Alexandra - Original Message - From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 6:17 PM Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder At least all the functions work, I mean I can edit, record and so forth without any problems and as long as I keep the application open then I don't lose any of my work so its not a huge issue, just unexpected to see no Save As Dialogue box. Will be purchasing on Thursday. On 11 Feb 2014, at 3:57 am, Alexandra Grünauer al.gruena...@gmx.de wrote: or they could produce a full version that works for, say, thirty days. Alexandra - Original Message - From: Chris H christopher...@gmail.com To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 8:42 AM Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder Why not contact APH and let them know. Surely it's no harm allowing one to view a dialogue box but not be able to take action with it. Regards Chris On 10/02/2014 05:03, Dane Trethowan wrote: Hi! I'm using the demo of studio recorder, I plan to buy my own copy later in the month. I don't have any problems with a demo copy of a piece of software having limitations but some limitations in some pieces of software just go beynd the bounds of common sense. In Studio Recorder the exporting and saving of files is disabled, so far so good but the problem is that the Save As dialogue box is also disabled thus you have no idea what formats are available for you to export or save to unless you rummage through the Studio Recorder manual, a very bad oversight on behalf of the developers and perhaps this can be rectified in future demo editions of the Studio Recorder application. . ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954 ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954
Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder
I think what he is asking is what good is a good quality job if you can't access it without sighted help? If we can't look at ourselves, and ask, why? then where does the learning start? - Original Message - From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 4:00 AM Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder So accessibility is far more important than a good quality job, is that what your'e saying? On 11 Feb 2014, at 9:49 pm, Peter Scanlon sca...@tpg.com.au wrote: For us accessability is most important, so how does that Steinberg compare with the ideal keyboard access to SF. -Original Message- From: Dane Trethowan Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 9:41 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder That's a very subjective comment regarding Sound Forge, I know people I work with who would have split and sore sides for a whole week if you told them that Sound Forge was an ideal piece of software for restoration work, they use something call StineBerg I think its called and they run a professional Audio/Video restoration business, according to them the Restoration plugins in SF are well over rated as is the software itself, again its a case of beauty being in the eye of the beholder. On 11 Feb 2014, at 9:38 pm, Jamie Kelly otrja...@gmail.com wrote: I use both programs. SF is ideal if you are doing any audio restoration with old tapes and records whereas SR all the functions are very accessible out of the box and you just want straight recording/editing tools. SF works best with JFW scripts if you use Jaws. Jamie -Original Message- From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Dane Trethowan Sent: Tuesday, 11 February 2014 5:21 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder Firstly, its cheaper than Sound Forge Pro and its been designed with accessibility in mind thus has a full feature set which is entirely accessible. the manual is well laid out and easy to get to, I sent a link to that yesterday. Editing/navigating keystrokes are straight forward and easy to use, I haven't found out yet whether it handles Daisy recordings but I suspect it does given that Studio Recorder has a navigation menu which allows the navigation by sentence, paragraph etc. On 11 Feb 2014, at 5:13 pm, Alexandra Grünauer al.gruena...@gmx.de wrote: Hi Dane, Would you be so kind as to explain the advantages of Studio Recorder compaired to other audio programmes like Sound Forge? Thanks a lot! Alexandra - Original Message - From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 6:17 PM Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder At least all the functions work, I mean I can edit, record and so forth without any problems and as long as I keep the application open then I don't lose any of my work so its not a huge issue, just unexpected to see no Save As Dialogue box. Will be purchasing on Thursday. On 11 Feb 2014, at 3:57 am, Alexandra Grünauer al.gruena...@gmx.de wrote: or they could produce a full version that works for, say, thirty days. Alexandra - Original Message - From: Chris H christopher...@gmail.com To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 8:42 AM Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder Why not contact APH and let them know. Surely it's no harm allowing one to view a dialogue box but not be able to take action with it. Regards Chris On 10/02/2014 05:03, Dane Trethowan wrote: Hi! I'm using the demo of studio recorder, I plan to buy my own copy later in the month. I don't have any problems with a demo copy of a piece of software having limitations but some limitations in some pieces of software just go beynd the bounds of common sense. In Studio Recorder the exporting and saving of files is disabled, so far so good but the problem is that the Save As dialogue box is also disabled thus you have no idea what formats are available for you to export or save to unless you rummage through the Studio Recorder manual, a very bad oversight on behalf of the developers and perhaps this can be rectified in future demo editions of the Studio Recorder application. . ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954 ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954 ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954 ** Dane Trethowan
Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder
I don't think they've updated this software for a very long time. -Original Message- From: Chris H Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 6:42 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder Why not contact APH and let them know. Surely it's no harm allowing one to view a dialogue box but not be able to take action with it. Regards Chris On 10/02/2014 05:03, Dane Trethowan wrote: Hi! I'm using the demo of studio recorder, I plan to buy my own copy later in the month. I don't have any problems with a demo copy of a piece of software having limitations but some limitations in some pieces of software just go beynd the bounds of common sense. In Studio Recorder the exporting and saving of files is disabled, so far so good but the problem is that the Save As dialogue box is also disabled thus you have no idea what formats are available for you to export or save to unless you rummage through the Studio Recorder manual, a very bad oversight on behalf of the developers and perhaps this can be rectified in future demo editions of the Studio Recorder application. .
Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder
There haven't been any major changes for the last 4 or so years no but you know the old saying, If it ain't broke then don't fix it, just because a piece of software hasn't been updated in a while doesn't mean its any good. On 10 Feb 2014, at 7:57 pm, Peter Scanlon sca...@tpg.com.au wrote: I don't think they've updated this software for a very long time. -Original Message- From: Chris H Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 6:42 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder Why not contact APH and let them know. Surely it's no harm allowing one to view a dialogue box but not be able to take action with it. Regards Chris On 10/02/2014 05:03, Dane Trethowan wrote: Hi! I'm using the demo of studio recorder, I plan to buy my own copy later in the month. I don't have any problems with a demo copy of a piece of software having limitations but some limitations in some pieces of software just go beynd the bounds of common sense. In Studio Recorder the exporting and saving of files is disabled, so far so good but the problem is that the Save As dialogue box is also disabled thus you have no idea what formats are available for you to export or save to unless you rummage through the Studio Recorder manual, a very bad oversight on behalf of the developers and perhaps this can be rectified in future demo editions of the Studio Recorder application. . ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954
Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder
Yes, I could contact APH and I would if it was a critical point but its not. On 10 Feb 2014, at 6:42 pm, Chris H christopher...@gmail.com wrote: Why not contact APH and let them know. Surely it's no harm allowing one to view a dialogue box but not be able to take action with it. Regards Chris On 10/02/2014 05:03, Dane Trethowan wrote: Hi! I'm using the demo of studio recorder, I plan to buy my own copy later in the month. I don't have any problems with a demo copy of a piece of software having limitations but some limitations in some pieces of software just go beynd the bounds of common sense. In Studio Recorder the exporting and saving of files is disabled, so far so good but the problem is that the Save As dialogue box is also disabled thus you have no idea what formats are available for you to export or save to unless you rummage through the Studio Recorder manual, a very bad oversight on behalf of the developers and perhaps this can be rectified in future demo editions of the Studio Recorder application. . ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954
Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder
As a footnote, Studio Recorder has an Update Software option available in the help menu so the developer does obviously intend to use this functionality at some stage smile. On 10 Feb 2014, at 7:57 pm, Peter Scanlon sca...@tpg.com.au wrote: I don't think they've updated this software for a very long time. -Original Message- From: Chris H Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 6:42 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder Why not contact APH and let them know. Surely it's no harm allowing one to view a dialogue box but not be able to take action with it. Regards Chris On 10/02/2014 05:03, Dane Trethowan wrote: Hi! I'm using the demo of studio recorder, I plan to buy my own copy later in the month. I don't have any problems with a demo copy of a piece of software having limitations but some limitations in some pieces of software just go beynd the bounds of common sense. In Studio Recorder the exporting and saving of files is disabled, so far so good but the problem is that the Save As dialogue box is also disabled thus you have no idea what formats are available for you to export or save to unless you rummage through the Studio Recorder manual, a very bad oversight on behalf of the developers and perhaps this can be rectified in future demo editions of the Studio Recorder application. . ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954
Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder
At least all the functions work, I mean I can edit, record and so forth without any problems and as long as I keep the application open then I don't lose any of my work so its not a huge issue, just unexpected to see no Save As Dialogue box. Will be purchasing on Thursday. On 11 Feb 2014, at 3:57 am, Alexandra Grünauer al.gruena...@gmx.de wrote: or they could produce a full version that works for, say, thirty days. Alexandra - Original Message - From: Chris H christopher...@gmail.com To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 8:42 AM Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder Why not contact APH and let them know. Surely it's no harm allowing one to view a dialogue box but not be able to take action with it. Regards Chris On 10/02/2014 05:03, Dane Trethowan wrote: Hi! I'm using the demo of studio recorder, I plan to buy my own copy later in the month. I don't have any problems with a demo copy of a piece of software having limitations but some limitations in some pieces of software just go beynd the bounds of common sense. In Studio Recorder the exporting and saving of files is disabled, so far so good but the problem is that the Save As dialogue box is also disabled thus you have no idea what formats are available for you to export or save to unless you rummage through the Studio Recorder manual, a very bad oversight on behalf of the developers and perhaps this can be rectified in future demo editions of the Studio Recorder application. . ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954
Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder
or they could produce a full version that works for, say, thirty days. Alexandra - Original Message - From: Chris H christopher...@gmail.com To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 8:42 AM Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder Why not contact APH and let them know. Surely it's no harm allowing one to view a dialogue box but not be able to take action with it. Regards Chris On 10/02/2014 05:03, Dane Trethowan wrote: Hi! I'm using the demo of studio recorder, I plan to buy my own copy later in the month. I don't have any problems with a demo copy of a piece of software having limitations but some limitations in some pieces of software just go beynd the bounds of common sense. In Studio Recorder the exporting and saving of files is disabled, so far so good but the problem is that the Save As dialogue box is also disabled thus you have no idea what formats are available for you to export or save to unless you rummage through the Studio Recorder manual, a very bad oversight on behalf of the developers and perhaps this can be rectified in future demo editions of the Studio Recorder application. .
Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder
Hi Dane, Would you be so kind as to explain the advantages of Studio Recorder compaired to other audio programmes like Sound Forge? Thanks a lot! Alexandra - Original Message - From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 6:17 PM Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder At least all the functions work, I mean I can edit, record and so forth without any problems and as long as I keep the application open then I don't lose any of my work so its not a huge issue, just unexpected to see no Save As Dialogue box. Will be purchasing on Thursday. On 11 Feb 2014, at 3:57 am, Alexandra Grünauer al.gruena...@gmx.de wrote: or they could produce a full version that works for, say, thirty days. Alexandra - Original Message - From: Chris H christopher...@gmail.com To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 8:42 AM Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder Why not contact APH and let them know. Surely it's no harm allowing one to view a dialogue box but not be able to take action with it. Regards Chris On 10/02/2014 05:03, Dane Trethowan wrote: Hi! I'm using the demo of studio recorder, I plan to buy my own copy later in the month. I don't have any problems with a demo copy of a piece of software having limitations but some limitations in some pieces of software just go beynd the bounds of common sense. In Studio Recorder the exporting and saving of files is disabled, so far so good but the problem is that the Save As dialogue box is also disabled thus you have no idea what formats are available for you to export or save to unless you rummage through the Studio Recorder manual, a very bad oversight on behalf of the developers and perhaps this can be rectified in future demo editions of the Studio Recorder application. . ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954
Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder
Firstly, its cheaper than Sound Forge Pro and its been designed with accessibility in mind thus has a full feature set which is entirely accessible. the manual is well laid out and easy to get to, I sent a link to that yesterday. Editing/navigating keystrokes are straight forward and easy to use, I haven't found out yet whether it handles Daisy recordings but I suspect it does given that Studio Recorder has a navigation menu which allows the navigation by sentence, paragraph etc. On 11 Feb 2014, at 5:13 pm, Alexandra Grünauer al.gruena...@gmx.de wrote: Hi Dane, Would you be so kind as to explain the advantages of Studio Recorder compaired to other audio programmes like Sound Forge? Thanks a lot! Alexandra - Original Message - From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 6:17 PM Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder At least all the functions work, I mean I can edit, record and so forth without any problems and as long as I keep the application open then I don't lose any of my work so its not a huge issue, just unexpected to see no Save As Dialogue box. Will be purchasing on Thursday. On 11 Feb 2014, at 3:57 am, Alexandra Grünauer al.gruena...@gmx.de wrote: or they could produce a full version that works for, say, thirty days. Alexandra - Original Message - From: Chris H christopher...@gmail.com To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 8:42 AM Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder Why not contact APH and let them know. Surely it's no harm allowing one to view a dialogue box but not be able to take action with it. Regards Chris On 10/02/2014 05:03, Dane Trethowan wrote: Hi! I'm using the demo of studio recorder, I plan to buy my own copy later in the month. I don't have any problems with a demo copy of a piece of software having limitations but some limitations in some pieces of software just go beynd the bounds of common sense. In Studio Recorder the exporting and saving of files is disabled, so far so good but the problem is that the Save As dialogue box is also disabled thus you have no idea what formats are available for you to export or save to unless you rummage through the Studio Recorder manual, a very bad oversight on behalf of the developers and perhaps this can be rectified in future demo editions of the Studio Recorder application. . ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954 ** Dane Trethowan Skype: grtdane12 Phone US (213) 438-9741 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589 Mobile: +61400494862 Fax +61397437954
Demo Of Studio Recorder
Hi! I'm using the demo of studio recorder, I plan to buy my own copy later in the month. I don't have any problems with a demo copy of a piece of software having limitations but some limitations in some pieces of software just go beynd the bounds of common sense. In Studio Recorder the exporting and saving of files is disabled, so far so good but the problem is that the Save As dialogue box is also disabled thus you have no idea what formats are available for you to export or save to unless you rummage through the Studio Recorder manual, a very bad oversight on behalf of the developers and perhaps this can be rectified in future demo editions of the Studio Recorder application.
Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder
Is this suitable for music tracks or just voice audio? What is the cost? Andrea On 10/02/2014 4:03 PM, Dane Trethowan wrote: Hi! I'm using the demo of studio recorder, I plan to buy my own copy later in the month. I don't have any problems with a demo copy of a piece of software having limitations but some limitations in some pieces of software just go beynd the bounds of common sense. In Studio Recorder the exporting and saving of files is disabled, so far so good but the problem is that the Save As dialogue box is also disabled thus you have no idea what formats are available for you to export or save to unless you rummage through the Studio Recorder manual, a very bad oversight on behalf of the developers and perhaps this can be rectified in future demo editions of the Studio Recorder application. -- Though no one can go back and make a brand new start, anyone can start from now and make a brand new ending. - Carl Brad
Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder
Why not contact APH and let them know. Surely it's no harm allowing one to view a dialogue box but not be able to take action with it. Regards Chris On 10/02/2014 05:03, Dane Trethowan wrote: Hi! I'm using the demo of studio recorder, I plan to buy my own copy later in the month. I don't have any problems with a demo copy of a piece of software having limitations but some limitations in some pieces of software just go beynd the bounds of common sense. In Studio Recorder the exporting and saving of files is disabled, so far so good but the problem is that the Save As dialogue box is also disabled thus you have no idea what formats are available for you to export or save to unless you rummage through the Studio Recorder manual, a very bad oversight on behalf of the developers and perhaps this can be rectified in future demo editions of the Studio Recorder application. .
