Re: [PD] multiblob tracking in Gem while objects keep their IDs
hi, it works on my machine (Ubuntu 64bit) with pd 0.44-extended-20130528 (Gem 93.3) and I can also confirm it works with latest pd vanilla and Gem 0.93.3 and it doesn't with the latest Gem from Git but I don't know why yet... + a -- do it yourself http://antoine.villeret.free.fr 2013/6/6 Max abonneme...@revolwear.com Am 06.06.2013 um 18:18 schrieb Jack j...@rybn.org: Hello Max, I have the same results than Antoine. A screenshot is attached. Configuration : Ubuntu 13.04, Pd 0.44.3, Gem ver: 0.93.git 374f713. I just tested it with another machine Windows Pd-ext 0.43 / Gem 0.92 Windows Pd-ext 0.44 / Gem 0.93.3 both work as expected. I'm wondering if it really could be your unreleased Gem version. Could you try a precompiled stock version instead? m. ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] PD-extended getting corrupted on Mac OS X
Maybe it's related to this? http://puredata.info/docs/tutorials/HowToTurnOffResumeWindowsForPDOnMacOSX107Lion On Jun 8, 2013, at 5:56 AM, pd-list-requ...@iem.at wrote: From: Brian Perez knight...@gmail.com Subject: [PD] PD-extended getting corrupted on Mac OS X Date: June 7, 2013 8:54:12 PM EDT To: PD list pd-list@iem.at Hey all, I've been having to delete preferences and reinstall a bunch of times. I get crashes for including objects from some of the extended libraries there. It can't be the way I'm installing: it's just drag and drop. I've been looking around for some clues, but I am wondering if anyone figured anything out definitively. Thanks Brian Dan Wilcox @danomatika danomatika.com robotcowboy.com ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] multiblob tracking in Gem while objects keep their IDs
Bonjour Antoine et merci beacuoup. Thanks a lot for testing this. A change in behavior between Gem release and git is probably not intended, so that's where I hope IOhannes can have a look into. max Am 10.06.2013 um 17:34 schrieb Antoine Villeret antoine.ville...@gmail.com: hi, it works on my machine (Ubuntu 64bit) with pd 0.44-extended-20130528 (Gem 93.3) and I can also confirm it works with latest pd vanilla and Gem 0.93.3 and it doesn't with the latest Gem from Git but I don't know why yet... + a -- do it yourself http://antoine.villeret.free.fr 2013/6/6 Max abonneme...@revolwear.com Am 06.06.2013 um 18:18 schrieb Jack j...@rybn.org: Hello Max, I have the same results than Antoine. A screenshot is attached. Configuration : Ubuntu 13.04, Pd 0.44.3, Gem ver: 0.93.git 374f713. I just tested it with another machine Windows Pd-ext 0.43 / Gem 0.92 Windows Pd-ext 0.44 / Gem 0.93.3 both work as expected. I'm wondering if it really could be your unreleased Gem version. Could you try a precompiled stock version instead? m. ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
[PD] [rjdj] abstraction?
Howdy, Does anyone who worked on/with the original RjDj app know what the [rjdj] abstraction does/did? I see it in playback.pd in the rjlib Github repo. Is it just a wrapper for a send? Like: [inlet] | [s rjdj] Dan Wilcox @danomatika danomatika.com robotcowboy.com ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] ANN: New Pd-L2Ork x86_64 and Raspberry Pi release now available together with comprehensive how-to
Ivica Ico Bukvic i...@vt.edu schreef: no, it didn't (yet?) first there was the message that some dpkg data was locked. trying to resolve that, there was found a strange new update file, filled with #padding lines. up until now i did not succeed to 'repair' the dpkg process i'll inform you lateron rolf That looks like something on your dpkg setup is messed up. You may want to google for a resolution. Best wishes, Ico hi ico, i made a fresh install of Ubuntu 12.04 repeated all the steps described by you / at the l2ork site. i used this command to save the output: ./tar_em_up.sh -B | tee l2ork-out.txt according to this file (attached) there should be a deb. in the terminal window however the text at the end is: [...] fakeroot dpkg-deb --build /home/rolf/pd-l2ork/packages/linux_make/build/ /home/rolf/pd-l2ork/packages/linux_make/pd-l2ork-`arch`-20130610.deb getopt: onbekende optie '--build' fakeroot, create a fake root environment. usage: fakeroot [-l|--lib fakerootlib] [-f|--faked fakedbin] [-i file] [-s file] [-u|--unknown-is-real] [-b|--fd-base fd] [-h|--help] [-v|--version] [--] [command] make: *** [deb] Fout 1 move full installer... mv: kan status van ‘*.deb’ niet opvragen: Bestand of map bestaat niet done. [...] apparently the error messages are not included in the file. there is no deb. rolf ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] ANN: New Pd-L2Ork x86_64 and Raspberry Pi release now available together with comprehensive how-to
Do you have dpkg-deb program installed? What happens when you type dpkg-deb in command line? Also, can you resend the attachment off-list as there was nothing attached (AFAICT). Thanks! -Original Message- From: ro...@dds.nl [mailto:ro...@dds.nl] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 5:47 PM To: Ivica Ico Bukvic Cc: 'pd-list' Subject: Re: [PD] ANN: New Pd-L2Ork x86_64 and Raspberry Pi release now available together with comprehensive how-to Ivica Ico Bukvic i...@vt.edu schreef: no, it didn't (yet?) first there was the message that some dpkg data was locked. trying to resolve that, there was found a strange new update file, filled with #padding lines. up until now i did not succeed to 'repair' the dpkg process i'll inform you lateron rolf That looks like something on your dpkg setup is messed up. You may want to google for a resolution. Best wishes, Ico hi ico, i made a fresh install of Ubuntu 12.04 repeated all the steps described by you / at the l2ork site. i used this command to save the output: ./tar_em_up.sh -B | tee l2ork-out.txt according to this file (attached) there should be a deb. in the terminal window however the text at the end is: [...] fakeroot dpkg-deb --build /home/rolf/pd-l2ork/packages/linux_make/build/ /home/rolf/pd-l2ork/packages/linux_make/pd-l2ork-`arch`-20130610.deb getopt: onbekende optie '--build' fakeroot, create a fake root environment. usage: fakeroot [-l|--lib fakerootlib] [-f|--faked fakedbin] [-i file] [-s file] [-u|--unknown-is-real] [-b|--fd-base fd] [-h|--help] [-v|--version] [--] [command] make: *** [deb] Fout 1 move full installer... mv: kan status van ‘*.deb’ niet opvragen: Bestand of map bestaat niet done. [...] apparently the error messages are not included in the file. there is no deb. rolf ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
