Bonjour Antoine et merci beacuoup.
Thanks a lot for testing this. A change in behavior between Gem release and git 
is probably not intended, so that's where I hope IOhannes can have a look into.

max

Am 10.06.2013 um 17:34 schrieb Antoine Villeret <antoine.ville...@gmail.com>:

> hi, 
> 
> it works on my machine (Ubuntu 64bit) with pd 0.44-extended-20130528 (Gem 
> 93.3)
> and I can also confirm it works with latest pd vanilla and Gem 0.93.3
> and it doesn't with the latest Gem from Git but I don't know why yet...
> 
> +
> a
> 
> --
> do it yourself                       
> http://antoine.villeret.free.fr
> 
> 
> 2013/6/6 Max <abonneme...@revolwear.com>
> 
> Am 06.06.2013 um 18:18 schrieb Jack <j...@rybn.org>:
> > Hello Max,
> >
> > I have the same results than Antoine.
> > A screenshot is attached.
> > Configuration :
> > Ubuntu 13.04, Pd 0.44.3, Gem ver: 0.93.git 374f713.
> 
> I just tested it with another machine
> Windows Pd-ext 0.43 / Gem 0.92
> Windows Pd-ext 0.44 / Gem 0.93.3
> both work as expected.
> 
> I'm wondering if it really could be your unreleased Gem version. Could you 
> try a precompiled stock version instead?
> 
> m.
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> 


_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to