Bonjour Antoine et merci beacuoup. Thanks a lot for testing this. A change in behavior between Gem release and git is probably not intended, so that's where I hope IOhannes can have a look into.
max Am 10.06.2013 um 17:34 schrieb Antoine Villeret <antoine.ville...@gmail.com>: > hi, > > it works on my machine (Ubuntu 64bit) with pd 0.44-extended-20130528 (Gem > 93.3) > and I can also confirm it works with latest pd vanilla and Gem 0.93.3 > and it doesn't with the latest Gem from Git but I don't know why yet... > > + > a > > -- > do it yourself > http://antoine.villeret.free.fr > > > 2013/6/6 Max <abonneme...@revolwear.com> > > Am 06.06.2013 um 18:18 schrieb Jack <j...@rybn.org>: > > Hello Max, > > > > I have the same results than Antoine. > > A screenshot is attached. > > Configuration : > > Ubuntu 13.04, Pd 0.44.3, Gem ver: 0.93.git 374f713. > > I just tested it with another machine > Windows Pd-ext 0.43 / Gem 0.92 > Windows Pd-ext 0.44 / Gem 0.93.3 > both work as expected. > > I'm wondering if it really could be your unreleased Gem version. Could you > try a precompiled stock version instead? > > m. > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list