Re: [PD] problems with pd extended (0.40.3)

2008-08-08 Thread martin brinkmann
Si Mills wrote:
  I've been using [expr~ ] as a workaround

 eg. [expr~ $v10.5]

ok, it is good to know that there is a workaround,
and i will probably use the expr-method in the future
for compatibility with 'pd vanilla'. but i am not
looking forward to converting all my patches...
thanks for your hint!

bis denn!
martin

___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] problems with pd extended (0.40.3)

2008-08-08 Thread IOhannes m zmölnig
martin brinkmann wrote:
 Si Mills wrote:
   I've been using [expr~ ] as a workaround
 eg. [expr~ $v10.5]
 
 ok, it is good to know that there is a workaround,

actually zexy provides the [~] objects _additionally_ as abstraction
which do exactly this: wrap [expr~]

the only problem with this is, that you have to decide beforehand
whether you want to have signals or float (messages) on the right-hand
input.
that's the main reason why zexy also provides [~] as an external object
(that allows both, depending on whether you specify a default argument -
just like [+~] and the like)


 and i will probably use the expr-method in the future
 for compatibility with 'pd vanilla'. but i am not
 looking forward to converting all my patches...
 thanks for your hint!

it's probably always a good idea to try to have a look inside 3rd-party
objects; sometimes they really are just abstractions and you can learn a
lot...


amdsr
IOhannes

___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] problems with pd extended (0.40.3)

2008-08-06 Thread Si Mills
i have the same problem too

I've been using [expr~ ] as a workaround

eg. [expr~ $v10.5]

s

On 6 Aug 2008, at 16:22, martin brinkmann wrote:

 hi!
 i'm sorry if this has been asked (and answered) before,
 but i have not found a solution yet. (in the list archive)

 ~
 ~
 (and maybe other signal operators from zexy)
 are not created. is there a workaround?

 vcf_hp2~ throws an iem_cot~... couldn't create,
 but only if not vcf_hp4~ (or some other iem-lib filters, i suppose)
 have been created before.

 bis denn!
   martin

 ___
 Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
 UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
 http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list