Re: [PD] Fwd: Re: why not Purr Data?

[Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list]

> So basically I guess you're telling me that I should either 1) upgrade to a 
> faster mac 
> or 2) move from using PurrData to using PureData Vanilla, to get rid of the 
> GOP-within-GOP-within-GOP -induced CPU spikes and high CPU usage I've been 
> having with my mid-2009 MacBookPro with PurrData?
Not sure at whom that is directed, but I'm definitely not saying that.

Post a trivial example patch on the tracker and I'll have a look and see if I 
can fix it:
https://git.purrdata.net/jwilkes/purr-data/issues
-Jonathan



On 3 October 2017 at 20:28, Alexandre Torres Porres  wrote:



2017-10-03 14:08 GMT-03:00 Jonathan Wilkes :

I'd be much more interested in a feature that automatically encapsulates the 
current selection inside an abstraction.

This is exactly what I believe I've seen a while back, maybe in pd-l2ork 1.0? 
There was even an youtube video showing it? My mind is tricking me into 
believing I even tried it myself and saw that it worked in Purr Data. How crazy 
am I?
cheers
__ _
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/ 
listinfo/pd-list





-- 
http://linkedin.com/in/esaruoho // http://twitter.com/esaruoho // 
http://lackluster.bandcamp.com //+358403703659 // http://lackluster.org // 
skype:esajuhaniruoho // iMessage esaru...@gmail.com 
//http://esaruoho.tumblr.com // http://deposit4se.tumblr.com // 
http://facebook.com/LacklusterOfficial //

   ___
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] Fwd: Re: why not Purr Data?

[IOhannes m zmölnig]

On 10/03/2017 07:08 PM, Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list wrote:
> That feature doesn't currently exist, though it's fairly trivial to 
> implement. (I believe 
> DesireData had it.)

Pd has it as well:
 https://git.iem.at/pd-gui/punish

gfmrdsa
IOhannes



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] Fwd: Re: why not Purr Data?

[Esa Ruoho]

So basically I guess you're telling me that I should either 1) upgrade to a
faster mac or 2) move from using PurrData to using PureData Vanilla, to get
rid of the GOP-within-GOP-within-GOP -induced CPU spikes and high CPU usage
I've been having with my mid-2009 MacBookPro with PurrData?

On 3 October 2017 at 20:28, Alexandre Torres Porres 
wrote:

>
>
> 2017-10-03 14:08 GMT-03:00 Jonathan Wilkes :
>>
>>
>> I'd be much more interested in a feature that automatically encapsulates
>> the current selection inside an abstraction.
>>
>
> This is exactly what I believe I've seen a while back, maybe in pd-l2ork
> 1.0? There was even an youtube video showing it? My mind is tricking me
> into believing I even tried it myself and saw that it worked in Purr Data.
> How crazy am I?
>
> cheers
>
> ___
> Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/
> listinfo/pd-list
>
>


-- 
http://linkedin.com/in/esaruoho // http://twitter.com/esaruoho //
http://lackluster.bandcamp.com //
+358403703659 // http://lackluster.org // skype:esajuhaniruoho // iMessage
esaru...@gmail.com //
http://esaruoho.tumblr.com // http://deposit4se.tumblr.com //
http://facebook.com/LacklusterOfficial //
___
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] Fwd: Re: why not Purr Data?

[Alexandre Torres Porres]

2017-10-03 14:08 GMT-03:00 Jonathan Wilkes :
>
>
> I'd be much more interested in a feature that automatically encapsulates
> the current selection inside an abstraction.
>

This is exactly what I believe I've seen a while back, maybe in pd-l2ork
1.0? There was even an youtube video showing it? My mind is tricking me
into believing I even tried it myself and saw that it worked in Purr Data.
How crazy am I?

cheers
___
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] Fwd: Re: why not Purr Data?

[Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list]

> I like how Pd-l2ork/Purr Data has many new features, like infinite undo, 
> arrays with bars. By the way, what's the shortcut to 
> automatically encapsulate a part of your patch as a subpatch in pd-lork/purr 
> data? I saw something once where you could select 
> a portion of the patch and do it.

That feature doesn't currently exist, though it's fairly trivial to implement. 
(I believe 
DesireData had it.)

I'd be much more interested in a feature that automatically encapsulates the 
current selection 
inside an abstraction.
-Jonathan

> cheers___
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] why not Purr Data?

[Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list]

> I will let you know as soon as I'm on a machine that I can install a 
> pre-compiled deb package of Purr Data on. Unfortunately, my personal 
> laptop is still running Ubuntu 16.04 i386 because I've been upgrading 
> for a couple of years and I never installed from scratch.
Oh, I see. No rush, then.
I thought you were talking about recent crashes.
Best,Jonathan
___
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] Fwd: Re: why not Purr Data?

[Alexandre Torres Porres]

I like how Pd-l2ork/Purr Data has many new features, like infinite undo,
arrays with bars. By the way, what's the shortcut to automatically
encapsulate a part of your patch as a subpatch in pd-lork/purr data? I saw
something once where you could select a portion of the patch and do it.

cheers

2017-10-03 6:59 GMT-03:00 Roman Haefeli :

> On Mon, 2017-10-02 at 23:07 -0400, Ivica Bukvic wrote:
> >
> >
> > This is why Pd-l2ork/Purr-Data has had for at least 2-3 years the
> > -legacy startup flag that ensures iemgui widgets are inconsistently
> > offset to match the vanilla behavior plus some other similarly
> > inconsistent behaviors...
>
> Ah, that's good to know and a crucial factor for being compatible with
> Pure Data. And I can confirm that with -legacy the GUIs of the patches
> I tested are usable (GUI wise) and look good in Purr Data now.
>
> Roman
> ___
> Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/
> listinfo/pd-list
>
>
___
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] Fwd: Re: why not Purr Data?

[Roman Haefeli]

On Mon, 2017-10-02 at 23:07 -0400, Ivica Bukvic wrote:
> 
> 
> This is why Pd-l2ork/Purr-Data has had for at least 2-3 years the
> -legacy startup flag that ensures iemgui widgets are inconsistently
> offset to match the vanilla behavior plus some other similarly
> inconsistent behaviors...

Ah, that's good to know and a crucial factor for being compatible with
Pure Data. And I can confirm that with -legacy the GUIs of the patches
I tested are usable (GUI wise) and look good in Purr Data now. 

Roman 

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] why not Purr Data?

[IOhannes m zmoelnig]

On 2017-10-02 18:11, Patrice Colet wrote:
> Purr Data looks like a continuity of pd-extended, anyway all pd versions
> are obsolete since they aren't fully 64bit compatible.

weird i've been using Pd on 64bit systems almost exclusively for the
last 10 years.
what makes you think that they are not fully 64bit compatible?

fgamsdr
IOhannes



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list