Re: [PD] [PD-announce] pd 0.47-0 test 1 released

2016-04-24 Thread AP Vague 
I did some test patches with the two versions that are compiled for OSX and
both had some problems with crashing Pd. I hadn't made much that was
complicated, so I don't think it's my fault such as a stack overflow. My
machine is a 2011 MacBook Pro running OSX 10.11.03.

On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Christof Ressi 
wrote:

> [list-drip] is indeed very nice and I can imagine it's great for teaching
> recursion, but after all it's a only a (albeit very clever) workaround for
> a problem which shouldn't exist in the first place ;-).
> However, I'm not sure at all if the solution would be additional methods
> for [list] or revising the existing code regarding some of the deep
> copying...
>
> *Gesendet:* Sonntag, 24. April 2016 um 18:06 Uhr
> *Von:* "Matt Barber" 
> *An:* "Christof Ressi" 
> *Cc:* PD-List , "Miller Puckette" <
> mpuck...@imusic1.ucsd.edu>
> *Betreff:* Re: [PD] [PD-announce] pd 0.47-0 test 1 released
> I don't know, I have a huge soft spot for [list-drip]. I think it's the
> paradigmatic example of how to do a recursive function in Pd (naive
> approaches to which usually die with a stack overflow). It makes sense to
> have a built-in iteration method for [list], but I'd kind of selfishly hate
> to obsolete [list-drip]. It's great for teaching because it makes students
> think a lot about how things are implemented.
>
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 7:49 AM, Christof Ressi 
> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks a lot! [clone] is a really awesome feature!
>>
>> I also like the new 'delete' method for [text]. Very nice!
>>
>> Just one question: Are there any plans to get rid of some deep copying in
>> the code for [list]? Some month ago we had a discussion about iterating
>> through lists in Pd and how it's not possible in linear time in pure
>> vanilla style (at least not in a trivial way, think of the [list-drip]
>> abstraction). You kind of made a hint that you might revise the code in a
>> future release. I'm just curious if this is something we could expect. I
>> checked and the 'naive' style with two [list split] objects still behaves
>> kind of exponentially.
>> Generally I find it a bit curious that in Pd one needs to split a list
>> twice (with all the copying involved) just to retrieve a single item. Have
>> you thought of implementing something like an 'iterate' method (I think I
>> even saw this in one of your to-do-lists) or even getter/setter methods,
>> like in [text] and [array]?
>>
>> Thanks a again for the release!
>>
>>
>> > Gesendet: Samstag, 23. April 2016 um 20:27 Uhr
>> > Von: "Miller Puckette" 
>> > An: pd-annou...@iem.at
>> > Betreff: [PD] [PD-announce] pd 0.47-0 test 1 released
>> >
>> > To Pd-announce:
>> >
>> > Pd version 0.47-0 test 1 is available on
>> http://msp.ucsd.edu/software.htm
>> > or via git from sourceforge:
>> >   git clone git://git.code.sf.net/p/pure-data/pure-data
>> >
>> > I'm still fixing bugs but the major changes are in place: a "clone"
>> object
>> > for making voice banks etc., and a "zoom" feature for people whose
>> > high-resolution displays make Pd's windows microscopically small.
>> (Also,
>> > setting the Pd window font size now extends to menus and dialogs).
>> >
>> > cheers
>> > Miller
>> >
>> > ___
>> > Pd-announce mailing list
>> > pd-annou...@lists.iem.at
>> > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-announce
>> > ___
>> > Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
>> > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>> >
>>
>> ___
>> Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>
>
> ___
> Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
___
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] waveform randomizer

2016-04-13 Thread AP Vague 
That would be great! That's outside of my expertise.

On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Dan Wilcox <danomat...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Very nice!
>
> Do you mind if I make the randomization into an abstraction?
>
> 
> Dan Wilcox
> @danomatika <https://twitter.com/danomatika>
> danomatika.com
> robotcowboy.com
>
> On Apr 13, 2016, at 12:15 PM, pd-list-requ...@lists.iem.at wrote:
>
> *From: *AP Vague <apva...@gmail.com>
> *Subject: **[PD] waveform randomizer*
> *Date: *April 13, 2016 at 12:14:51 PM MDT
> *To: *"pd-l...@iem.at" <pd-l...@iem.at>
>
>
> I wrote a patch to make interesting, pseudo-randomized waveforms in real
> time as a way to add complexity and variation to drones. The patch
> duplicates a table with randomization and uses [tabosc4~] as the final
> oscillators to dac. This version cascades the duplication process; table b
> is a copy of a, c is a copy of b, d is a copy of c. The results are pretty
> interesting and I think the signals could work well with other
> manipulations like filters.
>
> I'm afraid that this might have been the extreme longhand way to do this,
> ha ha ha. It works fine for what I wanted but I thought there might be some
> ideas on how to accomplish it in an easier way. I also just kind of wanted
> to share it.
>
> Cheers.
> 
>
>
>
___
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] How's Pd limited?

2016-02-22 Thread AP Vague 
Woah, that's definitely a problem I haven't heard of... I'm guessing you've
already tried using different builds. What OS are you on?

On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 7:07 PM, Morten Minothi Kristiansen <
mino...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On my last two comouters PD wont open unless I start it with a standalone
> patch I made long ago. It works for a little while, then crashes completely
> and for ever more...unless I use the stand alone. Recently...5 min before a
> gig the standalone wouldnt even start. The gig was fine as Im nott 100%
> relying on pd, but I have lost faith in PD EXTENDED and wish someone could
> have helped me earlier with this. I have posted and searched for answears,
> but didnt get nothing back. Aaaarrrhhh!!!
>
> I would mayyybe make a few more attempts if only someone serious would
> help me out with this and fix the problem, but thats yet to be the case.
>
> Ok... sorry about the rant. Had to get it out and now Im moving on with
> Max.
>
> Yebo
> Morten
> 22. feb. 2016 02.52 skrev "Matti Viljamaa" :
>
>> Perhaps a bit of broad question, but I find it interesting in order to
>> speculate about future additions.
>>
>> How do you think Pure Data is limited?
>> ___
>> Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>
>
> ___
> Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
___
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

[PD] noob question for Raspian NOOBS

2016-01-11 Thread AP Vague 
3 years experience with Pd, 3 hours experience with Raspberry Pi... Easily
installed NOOBS on a micro SDHC card, everything boots up correctly
including the desktop gui, internet access, etc. The downloads of Pd from
various links on puredata.info don't seem to be installing correctly as per
the instructions in the INSTALL.txt files. My question is: is the issue
with NOOBS, or does it make a difference versus an alternative Raspian
image? Terminal is returning errors such as "package does not exist," etc.
___
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list