Re: PESO: Wasp

2007-11-13 Thread David Savage
Thanks Paul.

Cheers,

Dave

On Nov 13, 2007 3:44 AM,  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I like it. Good detail, nice color, and I find the expansive environment 
 visually pleasing.
 Paul

  -- Original message --
 From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP9021.jpg

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: Wasp

2007-11-13 Thread David Savage
:-)

Thanks Igor.

Cheers,

Dave

On Nov 13, 2007 5:23 AM, Igor Roshchin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I agree with Godfrey.

 You might need a debugger! :-)

   http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP9021.jpg

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: Wasp

2007-11-13 Thread David Savage
On Nov 13, 2007 4:06 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Very nice, David.

Thanks Godfrey.

 Even though it's a bug shot. ];-)

It could be worse...

...I took a whole bunch of cat photos too :-)

Cheers,

Dave

 On Nov 12, 2007, at 7:23 AM, David Savage wrote:
  http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP9021.jpg

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: Wasp

2007-11-13 Thread David Savage
On Nov 13, 2007 5:17 AM,  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 In a message dated 11/12/2007 10:33:36 A.M.  Pacific Standard Time,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 G'day All,

 One from  this weekends bug hunt  (~120kb):

 http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP9021.jpg

 K10D,  Voigtlander 125mm f2.5 Macro, 1/200 @ f8, ISO 400

 All comments  welcome.

 Cheers,

 Dave


 ===
 Very nice! Good  brokeh, too -- I like the way the green pattern at the
 bottom sort of mirrors  some of the bee pattern. Well done.

Thank you Marnie.

The background/patterns are what made this shot stand out from the
others I took.

Cheers,

Dave

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: Bowling Night

2007-11-13 Thread David Savage
On Nov 13, 2007 11:13 AM, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Another pic from my bowling alley shoot of ten days ago.
 K10D with DA 16-45/4, f4.5 @ 1/30th, 5 40 flash off ceiling with
 reflector card raised.
 http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6634039size=lg

There's a bit of the dreaded vertical pattern noise in that one.

Re the motion blur, how many beers did you have?

;-)

Cheers,

Dave

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Last Clasp

2007-11-13 Thread Paul Stenquist
It doesn't. And you might want to extend that theme by adding a very  
small amount of Gaussian Blur. That would make them more uniformly  
soft. Might be a nice effect here.
Paul
On Nov 12, 2007, at 10:52 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 In a message dated 11/12/2007 6:54:02 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 Beautiful and moving. The softness is  appropriate.
 Paul
 ===
 Thanks, Paul.

 I thought it might not matter than much.

 Marnie aka Doe  :-)

 On Nov 12, 2007, at 7:48 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 For  various reasons, I have not shown these  before. These are
  among the last
 clasps...

 Both are soft, again,  probably  for obvious reasons, the first
 softer than
  the second. But I don't think they  are too bad. They are what I
 got and
 obviously can't be   reshot.


  http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/clasp1.htm

  http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/clasp2.htm


  Comments  welcome.

 Marnie aka  Doe


 -
 Warning: I am  now filtering my email, so you may be censored.




 ** See what's new at http:// 
 www.aol.com

 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above  
 and follow the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: More industrial nights and magic

2007-11-13 Thread David Savage
On Nov 13, 2007 3:13 AM, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello Ralf,

 Don't you ever get tired of making stunning night image after night
 image? grin   Another great shot!

Kinda' makes you wish you had some heavy industry nearby to shoot.

:-)

Cheers,

Dave

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: Odd Couple

2007-11-13 Thread David Savage
I think you've used up all your bandwidth Jack. I keep getting this
message when trying to view any of your recent PESO's:

Microsoft JET Database Engine error '80004005'

System resource exceeded.

/aspupload/detail.asp, line 19 

Cheers,

Dave

On Nov 13, 2007 2:18 AM, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Last of my Sunday afternoon experiments, about which I'm, also, luke
 warm.
 I chose to even the background rather than straighten up the mail
 boxes. Didn't notice at the time, but they had to have been on a slope.
 Looks like the blue box was tagged by either a pigeon or a vandal. If
 it had been done by an irate ex postal worker, those white spots would
 be bullet holes.

 Thanks for ANY comments.

 Jack

 http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=259

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: Bowling Night

2007-11-13 Thread Paul Stenquist
No beers at this point:-). But I was working rapidly and trying for  
some motion blur induced by subject movement. But I can see that I'm  
the one who moved here.

I don't see the vertical pattern noise. Where do you see it? I'll  
post an enlarged clip. I've examined the tiff at up to 200%. There's  
some conventional noise -- it's ISO 500 -- but nothing that appears  
to create a pattern of any sort.

On Nov 13, 2007, at 6:01 AM, David Savage wrote:

 On Nov 13, 2007 11:13 AM, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
 wrote:
 Another pic from my bowling alley shoot of ten days ago.
 K10D with DA 16-45/4, f4.5 @ 1/30th, 5 40 flash off ceiling with
 reflector card raised.
 http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6634039size=lg

 There's a bit of the dreaded vertical pattern noise in that one.

 Re the motion blur, how many beers did you have?

 ;-)

 Cheers,

 Dave

 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above  
 and follow the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: Bowling Night

2007-11-13 Thread David Savage
On Nov 13, 2007 8:55 PM, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I don't see the vertical pattern noise. Where do you see it? I'll
 post an enlarged clip. I've examined the tiff at up to 200%. There's
 some conventional noise -- it's ISO 500 -- but nothing that appears
 to create a pattern of any sort.

Odd. it's quite obvious to me in the dark shirts of the 2 nearest ladies.

It's not particularly strong, but the vertical banding is there.

Cheers,

Dave


  http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6634039size=lg

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: Bowling Night

2007-11-13 Thread Bob Sullivan
Paul,
I can't make out Dave's vertical banding, but can see the blur.
It confuses me because parts of the flash shot look sharp and others not.
Were you trying for a combination of flash and ambient lighting?
Regards,  Bob S.

On Nov 13, 2007 6:20 AM, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Nov 13, 2007 8:55 PM, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I don't see the vertical pattern noise. Where do you see it? I'll
  post an enlarged clip. I've examined the tiff at up to 200%. There's
  some conventional noise -- it's ISO 500 -- but nothing that appears
  to create a pattern of any sort.

 Odd. it's quite obvious to me in the dark shirts of the 2 nearest ladies.

 It's not particularly strong, but the vertical banding is there.

 Cheers,

 Dave


   http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6634039size=lg


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Last Clasp

2007-11-13 Thread Bob Sullivan
They are touching photos and an obvious end to you hands series.
Regards,  Bob S.

On Nov 12, 2007 6:48 PM,  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 For various reasons, I have not shown these  before. These are among the last
 clasps...

 Both are soft, again, probably  for obvious reasons, the first softer than
 the second. But I don't think they  are too bad. They are what I got and
 obviously can't be  reshot.


 http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/clasp1.htm

 http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/clasp2.htm


 Comments  welcome.

 Marnie aka Doe

 -
 Warning: I am now  filtering my email, so you may be censored.




 ** See what's new at http://www.aol.com

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: Wasp

2007-11-13 Thread Steve Desjardins
Nice catch!  Good DoF and sharpness on the wasp and pretty good bokeh as
well as some interesting patterns in the background. 

  -- Original message --
 From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP9021.jpg

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net 
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net 
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.

!SIG:47397cc182762794516608!


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: Bowling Night

2007-11-13 Thread Ed Matthew
I had to look a long time, but vertical banding seems to show up in
the black t-shirts.

Ed

On Nov 13, 2007 7:20 AM, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Nov 13, 2007 8:55 PM, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I don't see the vertical pattern noise. Where do you see it? I'll
  post an enlarged clip. I've examined the tiff at up to 200%. There's
  some conventional noise -- it's ISO 500 -- but nothing that appears
  to create a pattern of any sort.

 Odd. it's quite obvious to me in the dark shirts of the 2 nearest ladies.

 It's not particularly strong, but the vertical banding is there.

 Cheers,

 Dave


   http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6634039size=lg


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: Bowling Night

2007-11-13 Thread Paul Stenquist
I find this interesting, because I've always wondered what people  
were referring to when they complained about vertical banding. I've  
posted 200% sections of the two black shirts. The exposure speed here  
is probably closer to ISO 1000, even though these were shot at ISO  
500. To avoid losing highlights in the background I had to  
underexpose the foreground a bit and then brighten the shadows and  
midrange in conversion. I'm sure I pushed them up close to a full  
stop. With this extreme magnification I can see the colors that make  
up the black coming apart. I think it's a stretch to call it vertical  
banding. It's normal digital noise, what you'd get with almost any  
camera at this high an ISO. The only way I've ever been able to see  
something that actually looked like banding was shooting the inside  
of the lens cap and pushing it umpteen stops. Here are the clips:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6635580
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6635578
Paul
On Nov 13, 2007, at 7:20 AM, David Savage wrote:

 On Nov 13, 2007 8:55 PM, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
 wrote:
 I don't see the vertical pattern noise. Where do you see it? I'll
 post an enlarged clip. I've examined the tiff at up to 200%. There's
 some conventional noise -- it's ISO 500 -- but nothing that appears
 to create a pattern of any sort.

 Odd. it's quite obvious to me in the dark shirts of the 2 nearest  
 ladies.

 It's not particularly strong, but the vertical banding is there.

 Cheers,

 Dave


 http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6634039size=lg

 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above  
 and follow the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: Bowling Night

2007-11-13 Thread Paul Stenquist
Yes, a combination of flash and ambient. I wanted some motion blur in  
the shots of the bowlers (which proved to be a problem for other  
reasons), and I wanted the background to be lit. In the areas where  
the flash is most powerful it drowns out the motion blur.
Paul

On Nov 13, 2007, at 7:36 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote:

 Paul,
 I can't make out Dave's vertical banding, but can see the blur.
 It confuses me because parts of the flash shot look sharp and  
 others not.
 Were you trying for a combination of flash and ambient lighting?
 Regards,  Bob S.

 On Nov 13, 2007 6:20 AM, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Nov 13, 2007 8:55 PM, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
 wrote:
 I don't see the vertical pattern noise. Where do you see it? I'll
 post an enlarged clip. I've examined the tiff at up to 200%. There's
 some conventional noise -- it's ISO 500 -- but nothing that appears
 to create a pattern of any sort.

 Odd. it's quite obvious to me in the dark shirts of the 2 nearest  
 ladies.

 It's not particularly strong, but the vertical banding is there.

 Cheers,

 Dave


 http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6634039size=lg


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above  
 and follow the directions.


 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above  
 and follow the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: Bowling Night

2007-11-13 Thread David Savage
Viewing at magnification doesn't highlight this problem, it masks it.
(If you sand with your nose up against a tree all you see is bark.
Step back a ways and you'll see the forest ;-)

As I said it's not the worst example of the phenomenon, but I've
viewed this shot on 2 different monitors now  I can still see it.

Anyway, enough of this dirge, back to photos  Pentax talk.

Cheers,

Dave

On Nov 13, 2007 10:23 PM, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I find this interesting, because I've always wondered what people
 were referring to when they complained about vertical banding. I've
 posted 200% sections of the two black shirts. The exposure speed here
 is probably closer to ISO 1000, even though these were shot at ISO
 500. To avoid losing highlights in the background I had to
 underexpose the foreground a bit and then brighten the shadows and
 midrange in conversion. I'm sure I pushed them up close to a full
 stop. With this extreme magnification I can see the colors that make
 up the black coming apart. I think it's a stretch to call it vertical
 banding. It's normal digital noise, what you'd get with almost any
 camera at this high an ISO. The only way I've ever been able to see
 something that actually looked like banding was shooting the inside
 of the lens cap and pushing it umpteen stops. Here are the clips:
 http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6635580
 http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6635578
 Paul

 On Nov 13, 2007, at 7:20 AM, David Savage wrote:

  On Nov 13, 2007 8:55 PM, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  wrote:
  I don't see the vertical pattern noise. Where do you see it? I'll
  post an enlarged clip. I've examined the tiff at up to 200%. There's
  some conventional noise -- it's ISO 500 -- but nothing that appears
  to create a pattern of any sort.
 
  Odd. it's quite obvious to me in the dark shirts of the 2 nearest
  ladies.
 
  It's not particularly strong, but the vertical banding is there.
 
  Cheers,
 
  Dave
 
 
  http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6634039size=lg

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: Odd Couple

2007-11-13 Thread Jack Davis
Wish I had a clue as to why, so I could comment. Yours is the only such
message I've gotten.

Thanks for the advice, David. :-/

Jack
--- David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I think you've used up all your bandwidth Jack. I keep getting this
 message when trying to view any of your recent PESO's:
 
 Microsoft JET Database Engine error '80004005'
 
 System resource exceeded.
 
 /aspupload/detail.asp, line 19 
 
 Cheers,
 
 Dave
 
 On Nov 13, 2007 2:18 AM, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Last of my Sunday afternoon experiments, about which I'm, also,
 luke
  warm.
  I chose to even the background rather than straighten up the mail
  boxes. Didn't notice at the time, but they had to have been on a
 slope.
  Looks like the blue box was tagged by either a pigeon or a vandal.
 If
  it had been done by an irate ex postal worker, those white spots
 would
  be bullet holes.
 
  Thanks for ANY comments.
 
  Jack
 
  http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=259
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
 and follow the directions.
 



  

Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: Odd Couple

2007-11-13 Thread David Savage
On Nov 13, 2007 10:39 PM, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Wish I had a clue as to why, so I could comment. Yours is the only such
 message I've gotten.

 Thanks for the advice, David. :-/

I just tried again  it's working fine now.

I dunno what was wrong before.

Cheers,

Dave

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Last Clasp

2007-11-13 Thread Rick Womer
Marnie,

The first one just looks out of focus.  The second
one, though, has a shallow DOF that works very well.

I respect very much all the emotional work you've done
to be able to share these.

Rick

--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 For various reasons, I have not shown these  before.
 These are among the last 
 clasps...
 
 Both are soft, again, probably  for obvious reasons,
 the first softer than 
 the second. But I don't think they  are too bad.
 They are what I got and 
 obviously can't be  reshot.
 
 

http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/clasp1.htm
 

http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/clasp2.htm
 
 
 Comments  welcome.
 
 Marnie aka Doe  
 
 -
 Warning: I am now  filtering my email, so you may be
 censored.  
 
 
 
 
 ** See what's
 new at http://www.aol.com
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
 directly above and follow the directions.
 



  

Be a better sports nut!  Let your teams follow you 
with Yahoo Mobile. Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/sports;_ylt=At9_qDKvtAbMuh1G1SQtBI7ntAcJ

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: Wasp

2007-11-13 Thread Rick Womer
Very nice!  I don't like getting close enough to those
things to photograph them.

BTW, how do you get the watermark on the lower right
corner of your images?

Rick

--- David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 G'day All,
 
 One from this weekends bug hunt (~120kb):
 

http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP9021.jpg
 
 K10D, Voigtlander 125mm f2.5 Macro, 1/200 @ f8, ISO
 400
 
 All comments welcome.
 
 Cheers,
 
 Dave
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
 directly above and follow the directions.
 


http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW


  

Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO 2007 - 47a - GDG

2007-11-13 Thread Rick Womer
Weird.  I thought it was sideways until I noticed the
birds.  You're messin' with my mind, here, Godfrey!

Rick

--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Ok, simplify simplify ...
 
   
 http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/47a.htm
 
 Comments and critique always appreciated.
 
 enjoy
 Godfrey
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
 directly above and follow the directions.
 



  

Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Last Clasp

2007-11-13 Thread Eactivist
In a message dated 11/13/2007 7:04:25 A.M.  Pacific Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marnie,

The first  one just looks out of focus.  The second
one, though, has a shallow DOF  that works very well.

I respect very much all the emotional work you've  done
to be able to share these.

Rick

=
Thanks,  Rick.

Well, it is a little hard to take a hand pic, when one hand is busy  and one 
is not using a tripod. 

Marnie aka Doe  :-)

-
Warning: I am now  filtering my email, so you may be censored.  




** See what's new at http://www.aol.com

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Last Clasp

2007-11-13 Thread Eactivist
In a message dated 11/13/2007 3:07:01 A.M.  Pacific Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It doesn't. And you  might want to extend that theme by adding a very  
small amount of  Gaussian Blur. That would make them more uniformly  
soft. Might be a  nice effect here.
Paul

==
Hmmm, that might be a very good  idea.

Thanks, Marnie aka Doe  

-
Warning: I am now  filtering my email, so you may be censored.  




** See what's new at http://www.aol.com

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: Wasp

2007-11-13 Thread Adam Maas
Lightroom will automatically add a Watermark at Export if you've configured it 
to.

-Adam



Rick Womer wrote:
 Very nice!  I don't like getting close enough to those
 things to photograph them.
 
 BTW, how do you get the watermark on the lower right
 corner of your images?
 
 Rick
 
 --- David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 G'day All,

 One from this weekends bug hunt (~120kb):


 http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP9021.jpg
 K10D, Voigtlander 125mm f2.5 Macro, 1/200 @ f8, ISO
 400

 All comments welcome.

 Cheers,

 Dave

 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
 directly above and follow the directions.

 
 
 http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW
 
 
   
 
 Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
 http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
 



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Last Clasp

2007-11-13 Thread Eactivist
In a message dated 11/13/2007 4:23:29 A.M.  Pacific Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
They are touching photos  and an obvious end to you hands series.
Regards,  Bob  S.

=
Thanks, Bob.

Marnie aka Doe  :-)

-
Warning: I am now  filtering my email, so you may be censored.  




** See what's new at http://www.aol.com

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: Odd Couple

2007-11-13 Thread Jack Davis
Good...and I won't put you under the pressure of commenting. ;-))

Jack
--- David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Nov 13, 2007 10:39 PM, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Wish I had a clue as to why, so I could comment. Yours is the only
 such
  message I've gotten.
 
  Thanks for the advice, David. :-/
 
 I just tried again  it's working fine now.
 
 I dunno what was wrong before.
 
 Cheers,
 
 Dave
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
 and follow the directions.
 



  

Be a better pen pal. 
Text or chat with friends inside Yahoo! Mail. See how.  
http://overview.mail.yahoo.com/

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Digital Noise (Was Re: PESO: Bowling Night)

2007-11-13 Thread pnstenquist
I think it's important to make it clear that, for many, digital noise isn't 
necessarily a problem. And in any case, it's certainly not exclusive to Pentax. 
At the very least it's no more of a problem than is grain in film photography. 
I think any vertical pattern here exists more in your mind than in the image. 
If one tries hard enough, one can find a pattern in almost any random array. 
It's like finding the cloud that looks like an elephant :-).
Paul
 -- Original message --
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Viewing at magnification doesn't highlight this problem, it masks it.
 (If you sand with your nose up against a tree all you see is bark.
 Step back a ways and you'll see the forest ;-)
 
 As I said it's not the worst example of the phenomenon, but I've
 viewed this shot on 2 different monitors now  I can still see it.
 
 Anyway, enough of this dirge, back to photos  Pentax talk.
 
 Cheers,
 
 Dave
 
 On Nov 13, 2007 10:23 PM, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I find this interesting, because I've always wondered what people
  were referring to when they complained about vertical banding. I've
  posted 200% sections of the two black shirts. The exposure speed here
  is probably closer to ISO 1000, even though these were shot at ISO
  500. To avoid losing highlights in the background I had to
  underexpose the foreground a bit and then brighten the shadows and
  midrange in conversion. I'm sure I pushed them up close to a full
  stop. With this extreme magnification I can see the colors that make
  up the black coming apart. I think it's a stretch to call it vertical
  banding. It's normal digital noise, what you'd get with almost any
  camera at this high an ISO. The only way I've ever been able to see
  something that actually looked like banding was shooting the inside
  of the lens cap and pushing it umpteen stops. Here are the clips:
  http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6635580
  http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6635578
  Paul
 
  On Nov 13, 2007, at 7:20 AM, David Savage wrote:
 
   On Nov 13, 2007 8:55 PM, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   wrote:
   I don't see the vertical pattern noise. Where do you see it? I'll
   post an enlarged clip. I've examined the tiff at up to 200%. There's
   some conventional noise -- it's ISO 500 -- but nothing that appears
   to create a pattern of any sort.
  
   Odd. it's quite obvious to me in the dark shirts of the 2 nearest
   ladies.
  
   It's not particularly strong, but the vertical banding is there.
  
   Cheers,
  
   Dave
  
  
   http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6634039size=lg
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Digital Noise (Was Re: PESO: Bowling Night)

2007-11-13 Thread Adam Maas
Note that since the pixels are arrayed in a grid pattern, any random noise will 
acquire a modicum of pattern simply due to the pixel matrix.

-Adam
Who's DS does exhibit quite distinct banding occasionally at ISO 3200.


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I think it's important to make it clear that, for many, digital noise isn't 
 necessarily a problem. And in any case, it's certainly not exclusive to 
 Pentax. At the very least it's no more of a problem than is grain in film 
 photography. I think any vertical pattern here exists more in your mind than 
 in the image. If one tries hard enough, one can find a pattern in almost any 
 random array. It's like finding the cloud that looks like an elephant :-).
 Paul
  -- Original message --
 From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Viewing at magnification doesn't highlight this problem, it masks it.
 (If you sand with your nose up against a tree all you see is bark.
 Step back a ways and you'll see the forest ;-)

 As I said it's not the worst example of the phenomenon, but I've
 viewed this shot on 2 different monitors now  I can still see it.

 Anyway, enough of this dirge, back to photos  Pentax talk.

 Cheers,

 Dave



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Last Clasp

2007-11-13 Thread Cotty
On 12/11/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:

http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/clasp1.htm

http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/clasp2.htm


Comments  welcome.

Very moving Marnie.

-- 


Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__
||   (O)   | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Last Clasp

2007-11-13 Thread Eactivist
In a message dated 11/13/2007 8:22:19 A.M.  Pacific Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 12/11/07,  [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated,  unleashed:

http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/clasp1.htm

http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/clasp2.htm


Comments   welcome.

Very moving Marnie.

-- 


Cheers,
Cotty


Thanks,  Cotty.

Marnie

-
Warning:  I am now filtering my email, so you may be censored.  




** See what's new at http://www.aol.com

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Last Clasp

2007-11-13 Thread ann sanfedele
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

For various reasons, I have not shown these  before. These are among the last 
clasps...

Both are soft, again, probably  for obvious reasons, the first softer than 
the second. But I don't think they  are too bad. They are what I got and 
obviously can't be  reshot.


http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/clasp1.htm

http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/clasp2.htm


Comments  welcome.

Marnie aka Doe  

-


hard to look at - brought me to tears
ann

Warning: I am now  filtering my email, so you may be censored.  




** See what's new at http://www.aol.com

  




-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


RE: My SMC Pentax K 3.5 15mm is up for auction at ebay now

2007-11-13 Thread Jens Bladt
Gone already. For 600 USD (bargain price, I guess).
In less than 24 hours. To Hong Kong.
I hope the new owner there likes it too.
However, my new rectiliniar zoom - a SIGMA 10-20mm F4-5.6 DC EX does quite a
nice job too.

Regards
Jens


Jens Bladt

http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248

-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Jens
Bladt
Sendt: 12. november 2007 21:39
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: My SMC Pentax K 3.5 15mm is up for auction at ebay now


Hello list
For anyone who needs a nice  SMC Pentax K- 3.5 15mm rectiliniar wide angle -
for analog or digital Pentax cameras:
It's for slae on ebay now:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemrd=1item=190173324770ssPageN
ame=STRK:MESE:ITih=009

Please feel free to ask any questions you might have...

Regards

Jens Bladt

http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248

-

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.30/1126 - Release Date: 11/12/2007
12:56


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.30/1126 - Release Date: 11/12/2007
12:56

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.31/1128 - Release Date: 11/13/2007
11:09


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Last Clasp

2007-11-13 Thread Eactivist
In a message dated 11/13/2007 9:01:39 A.M.  Pacific Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
hard to look at - brought me  to tears
ann

===
The other reason the focus was a bit off  at the time.

And why it's taken me this long to show  them.

However, I think now is about time to finally put together a hand  gallery -- 
shot at various times. Over the next month or so I will work on  it.

Thanks for looking, ann.

Marnie  

-
Warning: I am now  filtering my email, so you may be censored.  




** See what's new at http://www.aol.com

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: Bowling Night

2007-11-13 Thread Eactivist
In a message dated 11/13/2007 5:27:31 A.M.  Pacific Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I find this  interesting, because I've always wondered what people  
were referring  to when they complained about vertical banding. I've  
posted 200%  sections of the two black shirts. The exposure speed here  
is probably  closer to ISO 1000, even though these were shot at ISO  
500. To avoid  losing highlights in the background I had to  
underexpose the  foreground a bit and then brighten the shadows and  
midrange in  conversion. I'm sure I pushed them up close to a full  
stop. With this  extreme magnification I can see the colors that make  
up the black  coming apart. I think it's a stretch to call it vertical  
banding. It's  normal digital noise, what you'd get with almost any  
camera at this  high an ISO. The only way I've ever been able to see  
something that  actually looked like banding was shooting the inside  
of the lens cap  and pushing it umpteen stops. Here are the  clips:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6635580
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6635578
Paul

==
I  really didn't notice it in the original photo. Maybe some people have 
better  monitors than I do. And I can only just see it in your extreme close 
ups. 
I've  had banding in shots (with Canon) at high ISO and it's much more obvious 
than  that. 

Marnie aka Doe  

-
Warning: I am now  filtering my email, so you may be censored.  




** See what's new at http://www.aol.com

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


My new toy

2007-11-13 Thread Boris Liberman
Hi!

And yet another shameless plug of my underdeveloped photo blog.

http://pentax-ways.blogspot.com/2007/11/my-new-toy-lens.html

Thanks to a fellow PDMLer whom I'd like to thank great many times, I now 
have my own SMCP DA 21/3.2 AL Limited lens.

Cheers.

Boris.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: My new toy

2007-11-13 Thread Sylwester Pietrzyk
On 2007-11-13, at 19:15, Boris Liberman wrote:

 Hi!

 And yet another shameless plug of my underdeveloped photo blog.

 http://pentax-ways.blogspot.com/2007/11/my-new-toy-lens.html

 Thanks to a fellow PDMLer whom I'd like to thank great many times,  
 I now
 have my own SMCP DA 21/3.2 AL Limited lens.
I hate you very much Boris :-D Let us know what you think about this  
lens when you play with it for a while ;-)



Cheers,
Sylwek




-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: My new toy

2007-11-13 Thread Jaume Lahuerta
So, you finally bought a DA lens...the resistance lost one of its most 
distinguished members.
;-)

Welcome to the DA lenses club. Now, should I join the DA prime club?...aghhh
(I think I'll manage to resist until the January big announcements)

Regards,
Jaume

- Mensaje original 
De: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Para: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net; PAW Project Discussions [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
Enviado: martes, 13 de noviembre, 2007 19:15:07
Asunto: My new toy

Hi!

And yet another shameless plug of my underdeveloped photo blog.

http://pentax-ways.blogspot.com/2007/11/my-new-toy-lens.html

Thanks to a fellow PDMLer whom I'd like to thank great many times, I
 now 
have my own SMCP DA 21/3.2 AL Limited lens.

Cheers.

Boris.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.





   
__ 
Pregunta, Responde, Descubre. 
Comparte tus consejos y opiniones con los usuarios de Yahoo! Respuestas 
http://es.answers.yahoo.com/info/welcome

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


photo.net upgrades

2007-11-13 Thread pnstenquist
Photo.net suprised me with some nice new features yesterday. Most importantly, 
it's now possible to rearrange the photos in any of your folders just by 
dragging and dropping. And it happens in real time. That's a huge improvement. 
Photos and folders open very rapidly. The workspace page now lists all your 
folders and links to rarrange photos or add photos for each. And every time you 
go to your workspace, four of your photos are displayed. They're apparently 
selected randomly. For someone like me with more than 500 pics on the site, 
it's  a lot of fun to see what comes up. Oh! I remember that. Better delete 
it:-).
Paul

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


RE: PESO: Odd Couple

2007-11-13 Thread Bob W
Works for me. 

The Internet is a wonderland of mystery and strange behaviour. I, for
example, can never see any of Christian's web pages. This is probably
something to do with my firewall and Christian's unorthodox web
address, and I'm probably missing something good, but I'm not messing
around with my firewall, it scares me.

--
 Bob
 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
 Behalf Of David Savage
 Sent: 13 November 2007 11:12
 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 Subject: Re: PESO: Odd Couple
 
 I think you've used up all your bandwidth Jack. I keep getting this
 message when trying to view any of your recent PESO's:
 
 Microsoft JET Database Engine error '80004005'
 
 System resource exceeded.
 
 /aspupload/detail.asp, line 19 
 
 Cheers,
 
 Dave
 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: My SMC Pentax K 3.5 15mm is up for auction at ebay now

2007-11-13 Thread pnstenquist
I think prices on most Pentax lenses are still going up, but the 15/3.5 
variants, which were very costly a few years ago,  might be an exception. Both 
the DA 14/2.8 and the DA 12-24 are as good or better, wider, and t less 
expensive. 
Paul
 -- Original message --
From: Bob Blakely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Yes. The researched going price in excellent (perfect glass, great 
 cosmetics) is ~US$900 (aboutt $700-$1100) depending on where you look for 
 the completed sales. I consider buying such things, waiting a couple months 
 and reselling.
 
 Regards,
 Bob...
 --
 Gort, klaatu barrada nikto!
   -- Guess the author!
   -- Guess the source!
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
  Gone already. For 600 USD (bargain price, I guess).
  In less than 24 hours. To Hong Kong.
  I hope the new owner there likes it too.
  However, my new rectiliniar zoom - a SIGMA 10-20mm F4-5.6 DC EX does quite 
  a
  nice job too.
 
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: My SMC Pentax K 3.5 15mm is up for auction at ebay now

2007-11-13 Thread Bob Blakely
Yes. The researched going price in excellent (perfect glass, great 
cosmetics) is ~US$900 (aboutt $700-$1100) depending on where you look for 
the completed sales. I consider buying such things, waiting a couple months 
and reselling.

Regards,
Bob...
--
Gort, klaatu barrada nikto!
  -- Guess the author!
  -- Guess the source!

- Original Message - 
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 Gone already. For 600 USD (bargain price, I guess).
 In less than 24 hours. To Hong Kong.
 I hope the new owner there likes it too.
 However, my new rectiliniar zoom - a SIGMA 10-20mm F4-5.6 DC EX does quite 
 a
 nice job too.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: My new toy

2007-11-13 Thread Jack Davis
I envy you. (mutter..mutter)

Jack ;)
--- Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi!
 
 And yet another shameless plug of my underdeveloped photo blog.
 
 http://pentax-ways.blogspot.com/2007/11/my-new-toy-lens.html
 
 Thanks to a fellow PDMLer whom I'd like to thank great many times, I
 now 
 have my own SMCP DA 21/3.2 AL Limited lens.
 
 Cheers.
 
 Boris.
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
 and follow the directions.
 



  

Be a better sports nut!  Let your teams follow you 
with Yahoo Mobile. Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/sports;_ylt=At9_qDKvtAbMuh1G1SQtBI7ntAcJ

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


RE: PESO: Odd Couple

2007-11-13 Thread Jack Davis
Yes, a 'minefield' of mysteries!!

Jack
--- Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Works for me. 
 
 The Internet is a wonderland of mystery and strange behaviour. I, for
 example, can never see any of Christian's web pages. This is probably
 something to do with my firewall and Christian's unorthodox web
 address, and I'm probably missing something good, but I'm not messing
 around with my firewall, it scares me.
 
 --
  Bob
  
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
  Behalf Of David Savage
  Sent: 13 November 2007 11:12
  To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
  Subject: Re: PESO: Odd Couple
  
  I think you've used up all your bandwidth Jack. I keep getting this
  message when trying to view any of your recent PESO's:
  
  Microsoft JET Database Engine error '80004005'
  
  System resource exceeded.
  
  /aspupload/detail.asp, line 19 
  
  Cheers,
  
  Dave
  
 
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
 and follow the directions.
 



  

Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Geso: Johanna V2. Cropping alternatives

2007-11-13 Thread Lasse Karlsson
From: Paul Sorenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 12:21 AM
Subject: Re: Geso: Johanna V2. Cropping alternatives


I prefer #3 - there's something mysterious about it.  Lighting looks
 like a flashlight (torch).
 -p

Hi Paul,

Thanks for the feedback.

You got yourself an icecream. In fact I didn't even have to go and buy it. I 
already had it in the fridge.
I made you a real big bowl of it . It's sitting right before me at the 
moment and it's all yours.
You can come and pick it up right away. Bring some girls too.
:)

Thanks,
Lasse

 Lasse Karlsson wrote:
 Thanks again for the feedback on the first Johanna pics.

 I updated the Johanna gallery with tree new pictures. (Same occasion and
 location, just a little later, but shot with another body, lens and film
 type.) It's just one shot, but with two alternate croppings of it.
 They make out the first three pictures.
 The first picture is the original as it was shot. The next two are two
 different ways to crop it.

 I would be very interested to hear somebody else's view on the suggested
 croppings.
 Do they, or any of them work at all?
 Would you prefer any cropped version before the original?

 http://photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=782151

 Just to add a bonus bait:
 If anyone can guess the lighting arrangement correctly, I'll buy you an
 icecream.

 Thanks,
 Lasse 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: Another Different Shot

2007-11-13 Thread ann sanfedele
Jack Davis wrote:

This was once an active practice range which is located in a river
bottom. It struggled for awhile, but was done in by gross
mismanagement.
This pretty much describes my golf game. Out of bounds, in the rough
under a brooding mantle.
I thought the debris, etc., included in the foreground enforced the
mood.
Plywood golfer is how we all 'pose' when we think we've hit an
impressive shot...and someones watching. ;)

Jack

Comments sought.

http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=258
  


LIke it  - although, would work fine in BW hmmm - yeah, might have a bit 
more impact but its nice as is...
certainly  ummm wait a min - one nit -- the can or whatever it is at the 
bottom left...   I think a bit of cropping would
make this alrady nice snap stronger.

ann


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

  




-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: Wasp

2007-11-13 Thread David Savage
On Nov 14, 2007 12:07 AM, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Very nice!  I don't like getting close enough to those
 things to photograph them.

Thanks Rick.

Unless you attack the nest, or swallow one (They have a tendency to
crawl into open soft drink cans) they're pretty benign

 BTW, how do you get the watermark on the lower right
 corner of your images?

I use a Photoshop action which is a variation (I use text instead of a
graphic) of the Digital Watermark Branding tutorial found here:

http://www.russellbrown.com/tips_tech.html

The beauty of this action is that it works on both portrait  landscape shots.

Cheers,

Dave

 --- David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP9021.jpg

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Paid For

2007-11-13 Thread Doug Franklin
Howdy, folks,

Well, in a sense, my K10D just paid for itself and the *ist D and a 
couple of lenses, to boot.  I shot a really big three-day amateur auto 
racing event this weekend, which I do every year.  This is my second or 
third year shooting it on digital.  Only this year did I really get into 
the digital swing of things, apparently ... I managed to take nearly 
3,000 exposures home, not even counting the ones I deleted in the camera.

The last time I shot film, it cost me about US$ 20 per 24-exposure roll 
for the film, developing, and medium res scanning.  Had I been shooting 
film, last weekend would've cost me around US$ 2,500 in film and 
associated costs.  But it wouldn't have ... on film, I'd never have 
tripped the shutter that many times.  I think the most I ever shot in a 
four-day event on film was about 50 36 exposure rolls, which is 40% of 
3,000 exposures.  And I more commonly shot around 30 rolls of 36 each in 
a 4-day event. :-)

I finally find that I'm doing more experimenting with digital as I'm 
finally getting it through my head that there's no significant 
additional cost per exposure.  I'm taking shots I would never have tried 
before.  I'm taking several of each shot so that hopefully I'll get an 
acceptable one.  Tons of things that I'd never have been able to afford 
on film.

That said, the chore of culling and post-processing 3,000 images is 
nothing to sneeze at. :-)

-- 
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: Wasp

2007-11-13 Thread David Savage
Thanks Steve. That Voigtlander lens is amazing.


Cheers,

Dave

On Nov 13, 2007 9:43 PM, Steve Desjardins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Nice catch!  Good DoF and sharpness on the wasp and pretty good bokeh as
 well as some interesting patterns in the background.
 
   -- Original message --
  From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP9021.jpg

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


PESO 2007 - 47b, 47c - GDG

2007-11-13 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
These were also made on the Sunday morning walk ...

   http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/47b.htm
   http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/47c.htm

Comments, critique, etc always appreciated.

enjoy
Godfrey


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO 2007 - 47b, 47c - GDG

2007-11-13 Thread Christian
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
 These were also made on the Sunday morning walk ...
 
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/47b.htm
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/47c.htm
 
 Comments, critique, etc always appreciated.
 
 enjoy
 Godfrey
 
 

The tree trunks are pleasing, but leaves in snow?  Godders?  Kinda 
cliche for you isn't it? :-)


-- 

Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: Odd Couple

2007-11-13 Thread David Savage
At 12:50 AM 14/11/2007, Jack Davis wrote:
Good...and I won't put you under the pressure of commenting. ;-))


I'll get around to it eventually...

...or not :-)

Cheers,

Dave 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO 2007 - 47b, 47c - GDG

2007-11-13 Thread Eactivist
In a message dated 11/13/2007 3:47:10 P.M.  Pacific Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
These were also made on the  Sunday morning walk ...

http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/47b.htm
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/47c.htm

Comments, critique,  etc always appreciated.

enjoy
Godfrey

===
I  really like the first. Love the colors.

Not fond of the rendering on the  second.

HTH, Marnie aka Doe  :-)

-
Warning: I am now  filtering my email, so you may be censored.  




** See what's new at http://www.aol.com

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: Another Different Shot

2007-11-13 Thread Jack Davis
Thanks, Ann!
It is such a hodge podge and didn't concern myself with that white
thing lower left. I, also, thought the debris at the bottom suited the
scene.
Certainly could be easily cropped out with a nip on the right to
balance it a little.

Jack


--- ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Jack Davis wrote:
 
 This was once an active practice range which is located in a river
 bottom. It struggled for awhile, but was done in by gross
 mismanagement.
 This pretty much describes my golf game. Out of bounds, in the rough
 under a brooding mantle.
 I thought the debris, etc., included in the foreground enforced the
 mood.
 Plywood golfer is how we all 'pose' when we think we've hit an
 impressive shot...and someones watching. ;)
 
 Jack
 
 Comments sought.
 
 http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=258
   
 
 
 LIke it  - although, would work fine in BW hmmm - yeah, might have a
 bit 
 more impact but its nice as is...
 certainly  ummm wait a min - one nit -- the can or whatever it is at
 the 
 bottom left...   I think a bit of cropping would
 make this alrady nice snap stronger.
 
 ann
 
 
 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
 http://mail.yahoo.com 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
 and follow the directions.
 




  

Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO 2007 - 47b, 47c - GDG

2007-11-13 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi

On Nov 13, 2007, at 4:52 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/47b.htm
 http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/47c.htm

 I  really like the first. Love the colors.

 Not fond of the rendering on the  second.

Thanks Marnie. :-)

Godfrey

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO 2007 - 47b, 47c - GDG

2007-11-13 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi

On Nov 13, 2007, at 4:08 PM, Christian wrote:

http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/47b.htm
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/47c.htm

 The tree trunks are pleasing, but leaves in snow?  Godders?  Kinda
 cliche for you isn't it? :-)

Thanks Christian. It's not snow, however. Hasn't snowed here in Silly  
Valley at this elevation in many years.

Godfrey

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Geso: Johanna V2. Cropping alternatives

2007-11-13 Thread Paul Sorenson
I'm on my way...all I need is your address.  ;}

-p

Lasse Karlsson wrote:

 
 Hi Paul,
 
 Thanks for the feedback.
 
 You got yourself an icecream. In fact I didn't even have to go and buy it. I 
 already had it in the fridge.
 I made you a real big bowl of it . It's sitting right before me at the 
 moment and it's all yours.
 You can come and pick it up right away. Bring some girls too.
 :)
 
 Thanks,
 Lasse
 
 Lasse Karlsson wrote:
 Thanks again for the feedback on the first Johanna pics.

 I updated the Johanna gallery with tree new pictures. (Same occasion and
 location, just a little later, but shot with another body, lens and film
 type.) It's just one shot, but with two alternate croppings of it.
 They make out the first three pictures.
 The first picture is the original as it was shot. The next two are two
 different ways to crop it.

 I would be very interested to hear somebody else's view on the suggested
 croppings.
 Do they, or any of them work at all?
 Would you prefer any cropped version before the original?

 http://photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=782151

 Just to add a bonus bait:
 If anyone can guess the lighting arrangement correctly, I'll buy you an
 icecream.

 Thanks,
 Lasse 
 
 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: Another Different Shot

2007-11-13 Thread Bob Sullivan
Jack,
Link works about 1 of 3 times for me.
No problem though, I don't care much for the picture...
The rest of your stuff is so much better.
Regards,  Bob S.

On Nov 13, 2007 6:56 PM, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Thanks, Ann!
 It is such a hodge podge and didn't concern myself with that white
 thing lower left. I, also, thought the debris at the bottom suited the
 scene.
 Certainly could be easily cropped out with a nip on the right to
 balance it a little.

 Jack



 --- ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Jack Davis wrote:
 
  This was once an active practice range which is located in a river
  bottom. It struggled for awhile, but was done in by gross
  mismanagement.
  This pretty much describes my golf game. Out of bounds, in the rough
  under a brooding mantle.
  I thought the debris, etc., included in the foreground enforced the
  mood.
  Plywood golfer is how we all 'pose' when we think we've hit an
  impressive shot...and someones watching. ;)
  
  Jack
  
  Comments sought.
  
  http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=258
  
  
 
  LIke it  - although, would work fine in BW hmmm - yeah, might have a
  bit
  more impact but its nice as is...
  certainly  ummm wait a min - one nit -- the can or whatever it is at
  the
  bottom left...   I think a bit of cropping would
  make this alrady nice snap stronger.
 
  ann
 
  
  __
  Do You Yahoo!?
  Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
  http://mail.yahoo.com
  
  
  
 
 
 
  --
  PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
  PDML@pdml.net
  http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
  to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
  and follow the directions.
 




  
 
 Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page.
 http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: My new toy

2007-11-13 Thread Boris Liberman
Well, yes, you're right, Jaume.

Jaume Lahuerta wrote:
 So, you finally bought a DA lens...the resistance lost one of its most 
 distinguished members.
 ;-)
 
 Welcome to the DA lenses club. Now, should I join the DA prime club?...aghhh
 (I think I'll manage to resist until the January big announcements)

You probably know more than I do regarding this announcements ;-). But I 
just needed a small and good wide lens for my stable.

Boris

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: Bowling Night

2007-11-13 Thread Boris Liberman
Hmmm. Paul, I thought bowling was actually a kind of sport. So how come 
one would smoke and eat potato chips (French fries?!) during the game?

Just kidding.

There is very strange sense of motion around these four people in the 
front...

Boris


Paul Stenquist wrote:
 Another pic from my bowling alley shoot of ten days ago.
 K10D with DA 16-45/4, f4.5 @ 1/30th, 5 40 flash off ceiling with  
 reflector card raised.
 http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6634039size=lg
 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Geso: Johanna V2. Cropping alternatives

2007-11-13 Thread Boris Liberman
The third from the left on the gallery page is the ultimate best.

Boris

Lasse Karlsson wrote:
 Thanks again for the feedback on the first Johanna pics.
 
 I updated the Johanna gallery with tree new pictures. (Same occasion and 
 location, just a little later, but shot with another body, lens and film 
 type.) It's just one shot, but with two alternate croppings of it.
 They make out the first three pictures.
 The first picture is the original as it was shot. The next two are two 
 different ways to crop it.
 
 I would be very interested to hear somebody else's view on the suggested 
 croppings.
 Do they, or any of them work at all?
 Would you prefer any cropped version before the original?
 
 http://photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=782151
 
 Just to add a bonus bait:
 If anyone can guess the lighting arrangement correctly, I'll buy you an 
 icecream.
 
 Thanks,
 Lasse 
 
 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


A question about chimping

2007-11-13 Thread Boris Liberman
Hi!

I like chimping ;-). (Like - I am alcoholic) But I am curious ;-).

Well, seriously now. On K10D one may zoom in as much as 20x into the 
image. Can anyone tell me what does it mean in terms of looking at the 
photo on the computer screen? And what is K10D equivalent of 100%?

Thanks.

Boris

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: My new toy

2007-11-13 Thread Boris Liberman
Sylwek, I am taking this lens with me on the trip to Prague and it just 
seems to me ;) that it will be my primary lens for the trip.

I hope that very soon I'll have enough shots to show ;-).

Cheers!

Boris



Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
 On 2007-11-13, at 19:15, Boris Liberman wrote:
 
 Hi!

 And yet another shameless plug of my underdeveloped photo blog.

 http://pentax-ways.blogspot.com/2007/11/my-new-toy-lens.html

 Thanks to a fellow PDMLer whom I'd like to thank great many times,  
 I now
 have my own SMCP DA 21/3.2 AL Limited lens.
 I hate you very much Boris :-D Let us know what you think about this  
 lens when you play with it for a while ;-)
 
 
 
 Cheers,
 Sylwek
 
 
 
 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: My new toy

2007-11-13 Thread Boris Liberman
Well, well... ;-)

Jack Davis wrote:
 I envy you. (mutter..mutter)
 
 Jack ;)


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: Bowling Night

2007-11-13 Thread Boris Liberman
Wow! I did not notice - they also drink beer!

;-)

Boris Liberman wrote:
 Hmmm. Paul, I thought bowling was actually a kind of sport. So how come 
 one would smoke and eat potato chips (French fries?!) during the game?
 
 Just kidding.
 
 There is very strange sense of motion around these four people in the 
 front...
 
 Boris
 
 
 Paul Stenquist wrote:
 Another pic from my bowling alley shoot of ten days ago.
 K10D with DA 16-45/4, f4.5 @ 1/30th, 5 40 flash off ceiling with  
 reflector card raised.
 http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6634039size=lg

 
 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Last Clasp

2007-11-13 Thread Boris Liberman
They are beautiful, Marnie! Just beautiful.

Boris

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 For various reasons, I have not shown these  before. These are among the last 
 clasps...
 
 Both are soft, again, probably  for obvious reasons, the first softer than 
 the second. But I don't think they  are too bad. They are what I got and 
 obviously can't be  reshot.
 
 
 http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/clasp1.htm
 
 http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/clasp2.htm
 
 
 Comments  welcome.
 
 Marnie aka Doe  
 
 -
 Warning: I am now  filtering my email, so you may be censored.  
 
 
 
 
 ** See what's new at http://www.aol.com
 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: A question about chimping

2007-11-13 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
If you leave the JPEG settings at full resolution and normal  
defaults, approximately 8-12x will be close to 1:1 pixel resolution  
for checking sharpness.

Since I capture exclusively in RAW format, I set JPEG settings to  
minimum size, sharpening and contrast so that the histogram is as  
close to what the RAW data should show as possible. 8x and the  
preview JPEG is looking a bit blurred in this case.

So I rarely chimp at all ... I turn off auto-review. But I leave  
histogram and saturation blinkies running when I do digital preview  
for checking exposures intentionally.

Godfrey


On Nov 13, 2007, at 9:30 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:

 I like chimping ;-). (Like - I am alcoholic) But I am curious ;-).

 Well, seriously now. On K10D one may zoom in as much as 20x into the
 image. Can anyone tell me what does it mean in terms of looking at the
 photo on the computer screen? And what is K10D equivalent of 100%?


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: Odd Couple

2007-11-13 Thread David Mann
On Nov 14, 2007, at 10:00 AM, Bob W wrote:

 The Internet is a wonderland of mystery and strange behaviour. I, for
 example, can never see any of Christian's web pages. This is probably
 something to do with my firewall and Christian's unorthodox web
 address, and I'm probably missing something good, but I'm not messing
 around with my firewall, it scares me.

IIRC his hostname has an underscore which can cause problems as it  
technically violates the standards (which may have been updated since  
I had problems with this several years ago).  I don't know who started  
allowing such domain names to become registered, but they're in common  
enough use now that everything should support them.

However it would not surprise me if some systems are still set to  
refuse requests for such domain names.

- Dave


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Those looking for a FA*300/4.5 tripod mount ...

2007-11-13 Thread Thibouille
Information here:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=25597175

-- 
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


RE: PESO 2007 - 47b, 47c - GDG

2007-11-13 Thread Bob W
 
 http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/47b.htm
 http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/47c.htm
 
  The tree trunks are pleasing, but leaves in snow?  Godders?  Kinda
  cliche for you isn't it? :-)
 
 Thanks Christian. It's not snow, however. Hasn't snowed here 
 in Silly  
 Valley at this elevation in many years.
 
 Godfrey
 

Cocaine?

--
 Bob
 



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


RE: PESO: Bowling Night

2007-11-13 Thread Bob W
it takes dedication and training to achieve excellence in all 3
activities. This is one of the main reasons for choosing the East End
of London to host the 2012 Olympic Games. For generations entire
families there have given their lives to their training. Admittedly it
has mostly been dedicated to darts, but bowling is also quite popular.
Lets hope these magnificent athletes get their chance to compete in
the Olympic games.

  There is very strange sense of motion around these four 
 people in the 
  front...

I believe doctors call it Bellius maximus wobblissimus.

--
 Bob
 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
 Behalf Of Boris Liberman
 Sent: 14 November 2007 05:34
 To: pdml@pdml.net  Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 Subject: Re: PESO: Bowling Night
 
 Wow! I did not notice - they also drink beer!
 
 ;-)
 
 Boris Liberman wrote:
  Hmmm. Paul, I thought bowling was actually a kind of sport. 
 So how come 
  one would smoke and eat potato chips (French fries?!) 
 during the game?
  
  Just kidding.
  
  There is very strange sense of motion around these four 
 people in the 
  front...
  
  Boris
  
  
  Paul Stenquist wrote:
  Another pic from my bowling alley shoot of ten days ago.
  K10D with DA 16-45/4, f4.5 @ 1/30th, 5 40 flash off ceiling with

  reflector card raised.
  http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6634039size=lg
 
  
  
 
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly 
 above and follow the directions.
 
 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.