Fwd: Re: Anyone else with Q7?
Forwarded Message Subject:Re: Anyone else with Q7? Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 17:03:22 -0400 From: P. J. Alling To: Steve Cottrell Wait, this was a big deal on the list a few years ago. Cotty, are you having memory problems? On 6/1/2017 4:51 PM, Steve Cottrell wrote: On 1/6/17, Jostein, discombobulated, unleashed: Oh, right. Not an uplifting first response... This is it: http://www.ricoh-imaging.co.uk/en/product/10404/body/overview/digital- mirrorless.html Never seen this before. Looks like a neat little camera. Any good? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Fwd: Re: Anyone else with Q7?
Once again I failed to reply to the list. Forwarded Message Subject:Re: Anyone else with Q7? Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 16:58:43 -0400 From: P. J. Alling To: Jostein Øksne Every time I was tempted a little voice told me it would soon be as orphaned as the Auto110, and lo now it is. So no I don't have one. I think if I were going to get something in that format, I'd look for an MX-1. At least I could justify to myself at least that it didn't really need a eye level view finder, and the MX-1 is actually a pocket-able pocket camera, which the Q series don't actually seem to be, at least if a lens is mounted. On 6/1/2017 1:29 PM, Jostein Øksne wrote: Picked up a Q7 kit today that came at an irresistible price. Any other users here? Jostein -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Fwd: Re: Anyone else with Q7?
Forwarded Message Subject:Re: Anyone else with Q7? Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 17:01:57 -0400 From: P. J. Alling To: Jostein Wow, they've been discontinued in Japan and the US for at last a couple of years now. I know where Ricoh sent the remaining stock now. On 6/1/2017 4:02 PM, Jostein wrote: Oh, right. Not an uplifting first response... This is it: http://www.ricoh-imaging.co.uk/en/product/10404/body/overview/digital-mirrorless.html Jostein Den 01.06.2017 20.57, skrev Daniel J. Matyola: What is a Q7? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Anyone else with Q7?
Mark, Very happy to read your considerations about macro. I had thoughts along similar lines, but actually for extreme macro studio work. Controlling vibration at 4X and beyond can be a pain. A setup that requires less magnification to fill the frame could be a good thing if the image quality is good enough. And the central shutter design and faster flash sync speed could also help reducing vibrations. This could be fun. :-) Jostein Den 2. juni 2017 01.11.20 CEST, skrev Mark C : >I have the original Q, not the Q7. It's a fun system though I haven't >used mine in a long time. Back in the days when I traveled for my job I > >took the Q kit on the road with me -camera , fisheye, normal zoom and >tele-zoom - a small, light but versatile kit. > >And as an update to the copy of this reply that I accidentally sent >directly to you - the IQ is decent, more than adequate for web based >images and good enough for smaller prints, though its best to keep the >ISO as low as possible. The Q7 sensor is about 50% larger than the >original Q in terms of surface area, so the IQ should be a bit better. > >IMO - one niche for the Q is for macro in the field. Let's say you have > >a gnat that is 6mm from head to toe and you want a photo of it as you >are hiking along. Pull out the Q, put on a K to Q adapter and a 1:1 >macro lens, shoot at f2.8 to f5.6. Very easy setup to carry and deploy >and at f 2.8 to f5.6 you could probably keep the ISO fairly low and >have >decent DOF but some diffraction limit on sharpness. But on APS-C or >full frame the gnat would need 4x to 6x magnification. Not so easy for >field work. For this kind of macro work, the Q / Q7 can let you get a >decent shot (not great) where you are not likely to get any shot at all > >using APS-C or full frame. > >Mark > >On 6/1/2017 1:29 PM, Jostein Øksne wrote: >> Picked up a Q7 kit today that came at an irresistible price. Any >other users here? >> Jostein -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Anyone else with Q7?
Depends on camera Mode, I guess. Jostein Den 1. juni 2017 22.13.15 CEST, skrev Larry Colen : > > >Jostein wrote: >> >> >> Den 01.06.2017 21.01, skrev Larry: >>> >>> >>> On June 1, 2017 11:57:44 AM PDT, "Daniel J. Matyola" >>> wrote: What is a Q7? >>> >>> The third quarter of next year. >>> >> >> Or the seventh quartile of a statistical distribution? > >To bring that back to photography, how many Sigma lenses of deviation >is >that? > >> >> -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Peso-Freeze
Today, as I was leaving the Colusa Ntl Refuge after a lean full tour drive, I passed the viewing deck. Crouched in front of it was a frozen Cottontail. Unusual to see a rabbit other than a Jackrabbit. Took a couple frames and am posting one here. Apparently I'm pretty desperate for a fresh wildlife image. 150-450 C&C? Thanks! J http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=1221 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO: Another Mountain
Dan - I like it - that grain and the subtle colors make it look like a Japanese print... ann On 6/1/2017 6:07 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote: In choosing an image for this month's PUG, I looked at my collection of mountain images over the years. I decided on one of the more unusual ones. I did, however, run across the oldest image in my mountain collection, a view of Fujisan from the air. It is not technically very good at all, but I was a real prize at the time, as I had made repeated attempts during my time in Japan to capture Fuji, from the ground, from the train, and from the air -- all to no avail. After my squadron's deployment to Japan ended, I made a flight to Tokyo, to ferry a plane scheduled for rehab. On the way into Tokyo, it was shrouded in clouds. While there for three days, we mad a short trip inland, and again I hoped to get a glimpse, but "no joy." On the way back, however, as we were making our outbound turn, suddenly it was there. By the time I retrieved my camera, the opportunity was almost gone, but I managed one fleeting shot. Last year, I returned to Japan for the first time in half a century, and took a trip on the Shikansen (Bullet Train) so that my wife and sun could also see Fuji in all its glory. Once again, to no avail. Although we traveled by train and bus to the fourth station, perhaps the classic viewing spot, but we were met by a drizzle and low overcast clouds.It is a very elusive mountain, more so than even Rainier. In any event, here is my only "View of Mt Fuji": https://dan-matyola.squarespace.com/danmatyolas-pesos/2017/6/1/fujisan Asahi Pentax Spotmatic, with smc SuperTakumar 50mm F1.4 lens Comments are welcome. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: GESO - Hood Ornaments
Thanks, Dan! And to everyone else who took a look as well. The museum seems to do a great job lighting the cars - lots of LED spotlights hitting the details in the displays. Mark On 6/1/2017 10:07 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote: Excellent, Mark! We have a classic car night here on Fridays during the summer. I have made many attempts at capturing hood ornaments, but my efforts never approached what you have done with these fine images. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 11:53 PM, Mark C wrote: Visited a car museum today - a handful of hood ornaments for your viewing pleasure: http://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/index.php/hood-ornaments All taken with the K1 and 28-105, f3.5-5.6. All shot with available light. K1 high ISO performance is pretty impressive. Mark -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Anyone else with Q7?
I have the original Q, not the Q7. It's a fun system though I haven't used mine in a long time. Back in the days when I traveled for my job I took the Q kit on the road with me -camera , fisheye, normal zoom and tele-zoom - a small, light but versatile kit. And as an update to the copy of this reply that I accidentally sent directly to you - the IQ is decent, more than adequate for web based images and good enough for smaller prints, though its best to keep the ISO as low as possible. The Q7 sensor is about 50% larger than the original Q in terms of surface area, so the IQ should be a bit better. IMO - one niche for the Q is for macro in the field. Let's say you have a gnat that is 6mm from head to toe and you want a photo of it as you are hiking along. Pull out the Q, put on a K to Q adapter and a 1:1 macro lens, shoot at f2.8 to f5.6. Very easy setup to carry and deploy and at f 2.8 to f5.6 you could probably keep the ISO fairly low and have decent DOF but some diffraction limit on sharpness. But on APS-C or full frame the gnat would need 4x to 6x magnification. Not so easy for field work. For this kind of macro work, the Q / Q7 can let you get a decent shot (not great) where you are not likely to get any shot at all using APS-C or full frame. Mark On 6/1/2017 1:29 PM, Jostein Øksne wrote: Picked up a Q7 kit today that came at an irresistible price. Any other users here? Jostein -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
PESO: Another Mountain
In choosing an image for this month's PUG, I looked at my collection of mountain images over the years. I decided on one of the more unusual ones. I did, however, run across the oldest image in my mountain collection, a view of Fujisan from the air. It is not technically very good at all, but I was a real prize at the time, as I had made repeated attempts during my time in Japan to capture Fuji, from the ground, from the train, and from the air -- all to no avail. After my squadron's deployment to Japan ended, I made a flight to Tokyo, to ferry a plane scheduled for rehab. On the way into Tokyo, it was shrouded in clouds. While there for three days, we mad a short trip inland, and again I hoped to get a glimpse, but "no joy." On the way back, however, as we were making our outbound turn, suddenly it was there. By the time I retrieved my camera, the opportunity was almost gone, but I managed one fleeting shot. Last year, I returned to Japan for the first time in half a century, and took a trip on the Shikansen (Bullet Train) so that my wife and sun could also see Fuji in all its glory. Once again, to no avail. Although we traveled by train and bus to the fourth station, perhaps the classic viewing spot, but we were met by a drizzle and low overcast clouds.It is a very elusive mountain, more so than even Rainier. In any event, here is my only "View of Mt Fuji": https://dan-matyola.squarespace.com/danmatyolas-pesos/2017/6/1/fujisan Asahi Pentax Spotmatic, with smc SuperTakumar 50mm F1.4 lens Comments are welcome. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Anyone else with Q7?
Looks nice -- in black and silver, at least. How much? Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Jostein wrote: > Oh, right. Not an uplifting first response... > This is it: > http://www.ricoh-imaging.co.uk/en/product/10404/body/overvie > w/digital-mirrorless.html > > Jostein > > Den 01.06.2017 20.57, skrev Daniel J. Matyola: > >> What is a Q7? >> >> > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Anyone else with Q7?
On 1/6/17, Jostein, discombobulated, unleashed: >Oh, right. Not an uplifting first response... >This is it: http://www.ricoh-imaging.co.uk/en/product/10404/body/overview/digital- mirrorless.html Never seen this before. Looks like a neat little camera. Any good? -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__Broadcast, Corporate, || (O) |Web Video Production -- _ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Anyone else with Q7?
Jostein wrote: Den 01.06.2017 21.01, skrev Larry: On June 1, 2017 11:57:44 AM PDT, "Daniel J. Matyola" wrote: What is a Q7? The third quarter of next year. Or the seventh quartile of a statistical distribution? To bring that back to photography, how many Sigma lenses of deviation is that? -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com (postbox on min4est) http://red4est.com/lrc -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Anyone else with Q7?
Den 01.06.2017 21.01, skrev Larry: On June 1, 2017 11:57:44 AM PDT, "Daniel J. Matyola" wrote: What is a Q7? The third quarter of next year. Or the seventh quartile of a statistical distribution? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Anyone else with Q7?
Oh, right. Not an uplifting first response... This is it: http://www.ricoh-imaging.co.uk/en/product/10404/body/overview/digital-mirrorless.html Jostein Den 01.06.2017 20.57, skrev Daniel J. Matyola: What is a Q7? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Anyone else with Q7?
You mean they finally made a digital version of my old Minox? https://www.keh.com/shop/subminiature-minox-b-chr-677262.html?m=Grouped&prod_id=1061516&aid=1061516&rmatt=tsid:1014300|cid:676289759|agid:35889222478|tid:pla-307105915884|crid:149636032508|nw:g|rnd:15725285926254861743|dvc:c|adp:1o1&gclid=COLJopesndQCFdeNswodBfoNVA Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Larry wrote: > > > On June 1, 2017 11:57:44 AM PDT, "Daniel J. Matyola" > wrote: > >What is a Q7? > > The third quarter of next year. > > Either that or a really small interchangeable lens camera. > > > > > > >Dan Matyola > >http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola > > > >On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Jostein Øksne wrote: > > > >> Picked up a Q7 kit today that came at an irresistible price. Any > >other > >> users here? > >> Jostein > >> -- > >> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. > >> > >> -- > >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >> PDML@pdml.net > >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > >and > >> follow the directions. > >> > >-- > >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >PDML@pdml.net > >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > >to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > >follow the directions. > > -- > l...@red4est.com http://red4est.com/lrc > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Anyone else with Q7?
On June 1, 2017 11:57:44 AM PDT, "Daniel J. Matyola" wrote: >What is a Q7? The third quarter of next year. Either that or a really small interchangeable lens camera. > > >Dan Matyola >http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola > >On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Jostein Øksne wrote: > >> Picked up a Q7 kit today that came at an irresistible price. Any >other >> users here? >> Jostein >> -- >> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above >and >> follow the directions. >> >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >PDML@pdml.net >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >follow the directions. -- l...@red4est.com http://red4est.com/lrc -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Anyone else with Q7?
What is a Q7? Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Jostein Øksne wrote: > Picked up a Q7 kit today that came at an irresistible price. Any other > users here? > Jostein > -- > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Anyone else with Q7?
Picked up a Q7 kit today that came at an irresistible price. Any other users here? Jostein -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: GESO - Hood Ornaments
Very nicely done, Mark! Really like these. The light is beautiful in all of them. On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 11:53 PM, Mark C wrote: > Visited a car museum today - a handful of hood ornaments for your viewing > pleasure: > > http://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/index.php/hood-ornaments > > All taken with the K1 and 28-105, f3.5-5.6. All shot with available light. > K1 high ISO performance is pretty impressive. > > Mark > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- -bmw -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: GESO - Hood Ornaments
Excellent, Mark! We have a classic car night here on Fridays during the summer. I have made many attempts at capturing hood ornaments, but my efforts never approached what you have done with these fine images. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 11:53 PM, Mark C wrote: > Visited a car museum today - a handful of hood ornaments for your viewing > pleasure: > > http://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/index.php/hood-ornaments > > All taken with the K1 and 28-105, f3.5-5.6. All shot with available light. > K1 high ISO performance is pretty impressive. > > Mark > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: GESO - Hood Ornaments
Yes, nicely rendered. Paul via phone > On Jun 1, 2017, at 7:17 AM, Jack Davis wrote: > > Very well done, Mark! > > J > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On May 31, 2017, at 8:53 PM, Mark C wrote: >> >> Visited a car museum today - a handful of hood ornaments for your viewing >> pleasure: >> >> http://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/index.php/hood-ornaments >> >> All taken with the K1 and 28-105, f3.5-5.6. All shot with available light. >> K1 high ISO performance is pretty impressive. >> >> Mark >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: LR 6.10 warning
Still? You should report that to adobe as a bug then. That might be mac specific. On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Larry Colen wrote: > > > Zos Xavius wrote: >> >> You did have the cursor set to adjustment mode didn't you? Otherwise >> what you are describing is the default behavior if viewing at 100%. > > > I haven't changed anything. Like I say, I click on the adjustment thingie to > get the cursor into adjustment mode. The dot will appear on the curve as I > move the cursor around, but clicking and dragging doesn't adjust the curve, > just moves the photo. > >> >> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Zos Xavius wrote: >>> >>> The curves adjustment works fine. Just tested it. No performance >>> issues anywhere either. I think its because you are using a Mac. ;) >> >> > > -- > Larry Colen l...@red4est.com (postbox on min4est) http://red4est.com/lrc > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: GESO - Hood Ornaments
Very well done, Mark! J Sent from my iPhone > On May 31, 2017, at 8:53 PM, Mark C wrote: > > Visited a car museum today - a handful of hood ornaments for your viewing > pleasure: > > http://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/index.php/hood-ornaments > > All taken with the K1 and 28-105, f3.5-5.6. All shot with available light. K1 > high ISO performance is pretty impressive. > > Mark > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
