Re: *ist D battery behavior

2003-12-05 Thread graywolf
Well, there has to be some kind of circuity. If you just connect two battery 
packs in parallel they tend to discharge each other. As the voltage of one pack 
goes down it draws current from the other trying to recharge itself, then vis 
versa. Eventually both packs are dead when the device they are in wasn't even 
turned on.

--

Rob Studdert wrote:

On 1 Dec 2003 at 5:12, Herb Chong wrote:


the little that seems to say anything implies that it is supposed to draw
from both at the same time.


Still trying to catch up:

The two battery sources are likely isolated by series diodes (configured like a 
logic OR gate). In that case the body would draw from the battery set from with 
highest voltage and there shouldn't be a switching transient as the one pack 
takes over the supply.Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998


--
graywolf
http://graywolfphoto.com
You might as well accept people as they are,
you are not going to be able to change them anyway.



Re: *ist D battery behavior

2003-12-05 Thread Rob Studdert
On 5 Dec 2003 at 21:14, graywolf wrote:

 Well, there has to be some kind of circuity. If you just connect two battery
 packs in parallel they tend to discharge each other. As the voltage of one pack
 goes down it draws current from the other trying to recharge itself, then vis
 versa. Eventually both packs are dead when the device they are in wasn't even
 turned on.

The two diodes would be the circuit, they behave like water stop-valves so 
would prevent self discharge of the essentially parallel power sources (plus 
reverse polarity protection). An additional diode would probably be provided to 
isolate DC power in too as this would prevent the batteries from being 
subjected to a charging current.

batt 1 ||,
  +- camera
batt 2 |||
  |
DC pow ||'

Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998



Re: *ist D battery behavior

2003-12-04 Thread Rob Studdert
On 1 Dec 2003 at 5:12, Herb Chong wrote:

 the little that seems to say anything implies that it is supposed to draw
 from both at the same time.

Still trying to catch up:

The two battery sources are likely isolated by series diodes (configured like a 
logic OR gate). In that case the body would draw from the battery set from with 
highest voltage and there shouldn't be a switching transient as the one pack 
takes over the supply.Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998



Re: *ist D battery behavior

2003-12-01 Thread Heiko Hamann
Hi Bruce,

on 30 Nov 03 you wrote in pentax.list:

how this is supposed to work?  Does it run off the ones in the body
first and then off the grip?  It didn't seem to seamlessly switch
from one set to the other.


The manual says (afair) that it uses the set of batteries that has more  
energy left. So it could be that the camera uses both sets alternately
if you often switch the camera on and off.

Cheers, Heiko



Re: *ist D battery behavior

2003-12-01 Thread cbwaters
I don't have the grip but my D seems to recharge the batteries when I switch
the camera off.  (wish) The battery indicator says half full and then full
again.  Who knows?
CW
- Original Message - 
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2003 11:29 PM
Subject: *ist D battery behavior


 I have the vertical grip on my *istD with batteries in both the body
 and the grip.  Just now, the camera indicated the batteries were dead.
 I switched it off and back on and it reported full.  I'm guessing
 that it switched from one set to the other.  Anybody have any idea
 how this is supposed to work?  Does it run off the ones in the body
 first and then off the grip?  It didn't seem to seamlessly switch
 from one set to the other.

 Anyone with experience with this?

 Thanks,

 Bruce





---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.544 / Virus Database: 338 - Release Date: 11/28/2003



Re: *ist D battery behavior

2003-12-01 Thread Leonard Paris
Batteries tend to recover a bit between uses.

Len
---
* There's no place like 127.0.0.1

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: *ist D battery behavior
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 06:23:31 -0500
I don't have the grip but my D seems to recharge the batteries when I 
switch
the camera off.  (wish) The battery indicator says half full and then full
again.  Who knows?
CW
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2003 11:29 PM
Subject: *ist D battery behavior

 I have the vertical grip on my *istD with batteries in both the body
 and the grip.  Just now, the camera indicated the batteries were dead.
 I switched it off and back on and it reported full.  I'm guessing
 that it switched from one set to the other.  Anybody have any idea
 how this is supposed to work?  Does it run off the ones in the body
 first and then off the grip?  It didn't seem to seamlessly switch
 from one set to the other.

 Anyone with experience with this?

 Thanks,

 Bruce



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.544 / Virus Database: 338 - Release Date: 11/28/2003
_
online games and music with a high-speed Internet connection!  Prices start 
at less than $1 a day average.  https://broadband.msn.com (Prices may vary 
by service area.)



Re: *ist D battery behavior

2003-12-01 Thread Bill Owens
I don't have the grip, but I have noticed that often, while the buffer is
writing to the card I get the same indication.

Bill

- Original Message - 
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2003 11:29 PM
Subject: *ist D battery behavior


 I have the vertical grip on my *istD with batteries in both the body
 and the grip.  Just now, the camera indicated the batteries were dead.
 I switched it off and back on and it reported full.  I'm guessing
 that it switched from one set to the other.  Anybody have any idea
 how this is supposed to work?  Does it run off the ones in the body
 first and then off the grip?  It didn't seem to seamlessly switch
 from one set to the other.

 Anyone with experience with this?

 Thanks,

 Bruce







Re: *ist D battery behavior

2003-12-01 Thread graywolf
Which would maximize the battery life. Not a bad idea from an engineering 
standpoint. Not quite so great from the photographers point of view.

--

Heiko Hamann wrote:

The manual says (afair) that it uses the set of batteries that has more  
energy left. So it could be that the camera uses both sets alternately
if you often switch the camera on and off.
--
graywolf
http://graywolfphoto.com
You might as well accept people as they are,
you are not going to be able to change them anyway.



Re: *ist D battery behavior

2003-12-01 Thread mike wilson
Hi,

Michel Carrère-Gée wrote:
 Where I can found the grip owner manuaal to download ??

http://www.pentax.com/docstore/index.cfm?show=6

Lists the camera manual but not the grip, yet.  Might be worth visiting
regularly.

mike



Re: *ist D battery behavior

2003-12-01 Thread bucky
I'll scan it and send it to you if you want.

Quoting mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Hi,
 
 Michel Carrère-Gée wrote:
  Where I can found the grip owner manuaal to download ??
 
 http://www.pentax.com/docstore/index.cfm?show=6
 
 Lists the camera manual but not the grip, yet.  Might be worth visiting
 regularly.
 
 mike
 




-
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/



*ist D battery behavior

2003-11-30 Thread Bruce Dayton
I have the vertical grip on my *istD with batteries in both the body
and the grip.  Just now, the camera indicated the batteries were dead.
I switched it off and back on and it reported full.  I'm guessing
that it switched from one set to the other.  Anybody have any idea
how this is supposed to work?  Does it run off the ones in the body
first and then off the grip?  It didn't seem to seamlessly switch
from one set to the other.

Anyone with experience with this?

Thanks,

Bruce




Re: *ist D battery behavior

2003-11-30 Thread William Robb

- Original Message - 
From: Bruce Dayton
Subject: *ist D battery behavior


 I have the vertical grip on my *istD with batteries in both the body
 and the grip.  Just now, the camera indicated the batteries were dead.
 I switched it off and back on and it reported full.  I'm guessing
 that it switched from one set to the other.  Anybody have any idea
 how this is supposed to work?  Does it run off the ones in the body
 first and then off the grip?  It didn't seem to seamlessly switch
 from one set to the other.

 Anyone with experience with this?

Mine does that. It doesn't seem to affect operation over much, so I don't
worry about it.

William Robb