Re: Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-13 Thread David J Brooks
I have a roll of Tmax in my F90X at this very moment.

Dave


-- 
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
York Region, Ontario, Canada

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-13 Thread Mark Roberts
David J Brooks wrote:

I have a roll of Tmax in my F90X at this very moment.

How long has that roll of film been in the that camera? (To the
nearest 10 years)
 
-- 
Mark Roberts - Photography  Multimedia
www.robertstech.com





-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-13 Thread David Savage
I haven't shot 35mm film in many years . Frankly 35mm film in the
digital age isn't worth the effort.

I do put a few rolls through the 6x7 every year though.

DS

On 10 March 2012 23:44, JC O'Connell hifis...@gate.net wrote:
 I have had my Pentax DSLR for 5 years now and only
 shot one roll of film since buying it. I am wondering
 if anyone is still using 35mm film regularly?

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-13 Thread Christine Nielsen
I'm teaching a photography class to middle schoolers this month.  Last
week, we were talking about the anatomy of a camera... I pulled out a
K-1000 to demonstrate a few things, and asked:  has anyone ever used a
film camera?

I got lots of blank looks, but then a hand went up, My Grandma has one!!

So, there you go.  One Grandma.

:)
-c

On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 10:44 AM, JC O'Connell hifis...@gate.net wrote:
 I have had my Pentax DSLR for 5 years now and only
 shot one roll of film since buying it. I am wondering
 if anyone is still using 35mm film regularly?

 -
 J.C.O'Connell
 hifis...@gate.net
 -



 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-13 Thread Bong Manayon
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 11:44 PM, JC O'Connell hifis...@gate.net wrote:
 I have had my Pentax DSLR for 5 years now and only
 shot one roll of film since buying it. I am wondering
 if anyone is still using 35mm film regularly?

I regularly shoot a random (black  white/color) roll of film once
every month or two until the middle of last year.  Then I was assigned
to teach Black  White Photography.  So now there is a roll of Neopan
in one of my film cams constantly.

-- 
Bong Manayon
http://bong.manayon.net

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-13 Thread David J Brooks
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Mark Roberts
postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
 David J Brooks wrote:

I have a roll of Tmax in my F90X at this very moment.

 How long has that roll of film been in the that camera? (To the
 nearest 10 years)

Since last Saturday, that's as close as i can get to 10 years.

Dave

 --
 Mark Roberts - Photography  Multimedia
 www.robertstech.com





 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.



-- 
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
York Region, Ontario, Canada

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-13 Thread DagT
Den 12. mars 2012 kl. 22:44 skrev Derby Chang:

 On 11/03/2012 7:08 AM, DagT wrote:
 No, just medium format. But on the other hand I´m building a darkroom for 
 that use these days.
 
 35mm is too small, digital is better. I just made a small museum for the 
 film stuff.
 http://i106.photobucket.com/albums/m265/dagthrane/_DT20614-gammalt-utstyr.jpg
 
 DagT
 
 
 
 
 OOooo. Camera pr0n. Dag, can you scroll left and right to show us more?

Not much there. Just an old Auto110 with three lenses, Olympus 35 RC and 35RD, 
and my Bronica SQ-A with PS40, 80 and 180mm. And of course the rest of my 
Razzle 4x5. The Bronica and Razzle are still in used, occasionally. 

DagT
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-12 Thread Cotty
On 11/3/12, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:

I hate to be a Linguistics Nazi, but Semantics is a part of Grammar, not
separate from it.

I hate to be a Nazi Nazi but you will be killed until you are dead dead dead.

--


Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__
||   (O)  | People, Places, Pastiche
--  http://www.cottysnaps.com
_



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-12 Thread Collin Brendemuehl
Just LF.
Only the occasional 35, and only rarely.

Sincerely, 

Collin Brendemuehl 
He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose 
-- Jim Elliott 






-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-12 Thread Gasha

Agree.
My last 35mm roll was shot back in 2006. Right before digitak K100d.

But i shoot medium format 6x4.5 and 6x7 often. Mostly BW, but sometimes 
also color negs and slides.


Gasha

On 03/10/2012 10:08 PM, DagT wrote:

No, just medium format. But on the other hand I´m building a darkroom for that 
use these days.

35mm is too small, digital is better. I just made a small museum for the film 
stuff.
http://i106.photobucket.com/albums/m265/dagthrane/_DT20614-gammalt-utstyr.jpg

DagT

Den 10. mars 2012 kl. 16:44 skrev JC O'Connell:


I have had my Pentax DSLR for 5 years now and only
shot one roll of film since buying it. I am wondering
if anyone is still using 35mm film regularly?

-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-





--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


RE: Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-12 Thread Bob W
 From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
 Cotty
 
 I hate to be a Linguistics Nazi, but Semantics is a part of Grammar,
 not separate from it.
 
 I hate to be a Nazi Nazi 

No you don't, you love it. You're Adolf Clarkson's far-right twin.

B

but you will be killed until you are dead dead
 dead.
 



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-12 Thread Derby Chang

On 11/03/2012 7:08 AM, DagT wrote:

No, just medium format. But on the other hand I´m building a darkroom for that 
use these days.

35mm is too small, digital is better. I just made a small museum for the film 
stuff.
http://i106.photobucket.com/albums/m265/dagthrane/_DT20614-gammalt-utstyr.jpg

DagT





OOooo. Camera pr0n. Dag, can you scroll left and right to show us more?

I alternate between digital and film regularly. Shot some neopan on the 
weekend (no Pentax content, though)


http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/12/12_03/12_03_neopan/index.htm

--

der...@iinet.net.au
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-12 Thread Darren Addy
All of you Grammar Nazis, Semantic Nazis, and Linguistic Nazis are
going to give Nazis a bad name.

Darren Addy
Kearney, Nebraska

On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 4:09 AM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:

  BTW, I hate to play the Grammar Nazi, but slide films and reversal
  films aren't opposites, they are one and the same.

 I hate to be a Semantic Nazi, but you were being a Semantic Nazi, not a
 Grammar Nazi.


 I hate to be a Linguistics Nazi, but Semantics is a part of Grammar, not
 separate from it.

 B


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-12 Thread David Savage
MAARR!

On 13/03/2012, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
 All of you Grammar Nazis, Semantic Nazis, and Linguistic Nazis are
 going to give Nazis a bad name.

 Darren Addy
 Kearney, Nebraska

 On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 4:09 AM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:

  BTW, I hate to play the Grammar Nazi, but slide films and reversal
  films aren't opposites, they are one and the same.

 I hate to be a Semantic Nazi, but you were being a Semantic Nazi, not a
 Grammar Nazi.


 I hate to be a Linguistics Nazi, but Semantics is a part of Grammar, not
 separate from it.

 B


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


RE: Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-12 Thread John Coyle
Yep, I've basically gone back to film for family stuff, as my wife complains 
that she
never gets to see any prints from digital - mainly because my work involves 
being on the
computer all day, and so I seldom feel like spending time on it again 
processing images.
In addition, I have a small collection of film cameras, 35mm and  6x6, SLR's, a
rangefinder and a TLR, all of which work well and deserve to be taken out and 
exercised
now and again.  It's particularly good when I realise again how smooth and 
pleasant to
work with are the two Pentax's at each end of my collection, an SV and an MZ-S.


John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia


-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of JC 
O'Connell
Sent: Sunday, 11 March 2012 1:45 AM
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: Anybody still shooting film?

I have had my Pentax DSLR for 5 years now and only shot one roll of film since 
buying it.
I am wondering if anyone is still using 35mm film regularly?

-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the
directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-11 Thread Anthony Farr
On 11 March 2012 15:30, Matthew Hunt m...@pobox.com wrote:


 I hate to be a Semantic Nazi, but you were being a Semantic Nazi, not
 a Grammar Nazi.


I knew that, but as Semantic Nazi  was unknown to me, and Grammar
Nazi was a cliche known to everyone, I decided to go with the popular
term at the risk of being incorrect.

regards, Anthony

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


RE: Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-11 Thread Bob W
 
  BTW, I hate to play the Grammar Nazi, but slide films and reversal
  films aren't opposites, they are one and the same.
 
 I hate to be a Semantic Nazi, but you were being a Semantic Nazi, not a
 Grammar Nazi.
 

I hate to be a Linguistics Nazi, but Semantics is a part of Grammar, not
separate from it.

B


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-11 Thread Anthony Farr
On 11 March 2012 20:09, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:

  BTW, I hate to play the Grammar Nazi, but slide films and reversal
  films aren't opposites, they are one and the same.

 I hate to be a Semantic Nazi, but you were being a Semantic Nazi, not a
 Grammar Nazi.


 I hate to be a Linguistics Nazi, but Semantics is a part of Grammar, not
 separate from it.

 B


Thanks, Bob, although I wish I'd seen your message a little earlier
than I did.  Two feet in one mouth isn't a good look.

regards, Anthony

   Of what use is lens and light
    to those who lack in mind and sight
                                               (Anon)

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-11 Thread Larry Colen

On Mar 11, 2012, at 1:38 AM, Anthony Farr wrote:
 
 Thanks, Bob, although I wish I'd seen your message a little earlier
 than I did.  Two feet in one mouth isn't a good look.

I think that would depend on the feet, and possibly what shoes she was wearing.

It's not *my* kink, but I try not to let that stop me from getting a good 
picture out of it.

--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est





-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-11 Thread P. J. Alling
There should have been the word not before reversal, (bad editor, oh 
wait a minute...).



On 3/10/2012 11:24 PM, Anthony Farr wrote:

On 11 March 2012 07:28, P. J. Allingwebstertwenty...@gmail.com  wrote:

I'm sorry, by their ages past naming convention, Ektar should by rights be a
slide film.  I didn't realize it was a reversal film.



Ekta wasn't a naming convention reserved just for transparency
film such as Ektachrome.  Other products used the Ekta prefix, among
them Ektacolor, Ektapress, Ektaprint, Ektaflex, as well as the Ektar
colour negative film already mentioned.

BTW, I hate to play the Grammar Nazi, but slide films and reversal
films aren't opposites, they are one and the same.  You must have
meant negative when you wrote reversal.  Simply explained,
practically all emulsions are natively negative. Slide films have a
reversal step during processing.  Hence, slide film is called reversal
film.

There are (were) a very small number of natively positive products.
Ilfochrome (formerly Cibachrome) is the one which most people will
know.  It is a dye destruction process, where the exposing light
breaks down Azo dyes and renders them unable to be developed, leaving
colour density only in unexposed areas.  Dyeline paper (the newer
alternative to blueprint paper) was a simpler type of the dye
destruction where the dye in the white areas was destroyed by UV
exposure while the remaining unexposed azo dyes were developed by
ammonia vapour, to become the black lines of architectural drawings.
Lastly there was a rarer process called autopositive or auto reversal.
  These materials had been exposed to the point of reversal, a point
of gross overexposure where any further exposure actually reduced the
latent image density, i.e. more light = less density.  This material
was definitely a lab material, not a general photographic film.  It
had very poor tonal characteristic but was useful in graphic arts
processes.

regards, Anthony




--
Don't lose heart!  They might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid a 
lengthily search.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-11 Thread P. J. Alling

On 3/11/2012 4:53 AM, Larry Colen wrote:

On Mar 11, 2012, at 1:38 AM, Anthony Farr wrote:

Thanks, Bob, although I wish I'd seen your message a little earlier
than I did.  Two feet in one mouth isn't a good look.

I think that would depend on the feet, and possibly what shoes she was wearing.

It's not *my* kink, but I try not to let that stop me from getting a good 
picture out of it.


bleach I need more bleach...


--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est








--
Don't lose heart!  They might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid a 
lengthily search.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-11 Thread Anthony Farr
On 11 March 2012 23:10, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:


 bleach I need more bleach...



Wishing to supply a link to a picture that would flesh out Larry's
proposition, I did a Google image search for feet in mouth.  Hey,
it's a big world, there must be a picture to illustrate anything a
person can imagine.

I usually have safe search set to off.  The results turned me right
off further pursuit of the topic, I'm afraid.  Sheesh, talk about
needing eye-bleach, .

regards, Anthony

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-11 Thread Matthew Hunt
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 5:09 AM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:

  BTW, I hate to play the Grammar Nazi, but slide films and reversal
  films aren't opposites, they are one and the same.

 I hate to be a Semantic Nazi, but you were being a Semantic Nazi, not a
 Grammar Nazi.


 I hate to be a Linguistics Nazi, but Semantics is a part of Grammar, not
 separate from it.

I'm just disappointed that none of you took the opportunity to point
out that the Nazis were anti-semantic.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-11 Thread Scott Loveless
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 3:08 PM, DagT li...@thrane.name wrote:
 No, just medium format. But on the other hand I´m building a darkroom for 
 that use these days.

 35mm is too small, digital is better. I just made a small museum for the film 
 stuff.
 http://i106.photobucket.com/albums/m265/dagthrane/_DT20614-gammalt-utstyr.jpg

I haven't shot much more than snaps of the kids with a point-and-shoot
for the last year or so.  But we just bought a house with a big,
unfinished basement.  And I just sourced a Beseler 4x5.  (Which just
happens to be the old Harrisburg police enlarger.)  I'm sure you all
can figure out where I'm headed with this.

-- 
Scott Loveless
Camp Hill, PA  USA
http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/
    __o
  _'\,_
 (*)/  (*)

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-11 Thread John Sessoms

From: Robert and Leigh Woerner


Hi PDML Gang,

I haven't shot much film since getting a K20D in 2009 and then a K5 in December
2011.

The cost of film is horrendous, and, Kodak keeps cutting their own throats.
Kodachrome made them unique and bam, they discontinued it. I do like the Ektar
and had quite a fling with it in 2010 and some in 2011. I expect Kodak will
vaporize soon.



I would liken Kodak's struggles more to amputating successive limbs 
trying to save the patient from gangrene.


I understand why they ended up discontinuing Kodachrome. It was not 
economically competitive. Everybody *LOVED* Kodachrome, but they shot 
Ektachrome  Fujichrome because it was just as good and cost less.




Fuji Reala was my all 'round fave though. Can't find it in 35mm at BH or
Adorama anymore. You would think they would serve the boutique market as I see
several folks on Flickr posting film stuff.



Looks like it's available in 35mm through Amazon.com. I think Fuji is 
still making it. The page at their web site does NOT indicate it being 
discontinued.


http://www.fujifilm.com/products/consumer_film/color_negativefilms_35mm/superia_reala/


Film was more fun and best overall and I didn't have to mess with it for
hours. I get tired of sitting at a computer. I do miss the days of film where I
could fire and forget. If you had the right film, glass and exposure, all you
needed was a competent lab to complete the magic.

 Technology has pushed me into digital, and, it is quite good. I am also
spending less money per year than I was shooting film. Love the K5. Love the
dedicated APS lenses like the SDM 16-50 f2.8 and the SDM 50-135 f2.8. Just got a
DA 35 Limited. Lusting after a DA* 55 f1.4.

Robert


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-11 Thread Bob Sullivan
John,
More than price, Kodachrome's problems at the film scanner caused it's downfall.
Regards,  Bob S.

On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 11:01 AM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
 From: Robert and Leigh Woerner

 Hi PDML Gang,

 I haven't shot much film since getting a K20D in 2009 and then a K5 in
 December
 2011.

 The cost of film is horrendous, and, Kodak keeps cutting their own
 throats.
 Kodachrome made them unique and bam, they discontinued it. I do like the
 Ektar
 and had quite a fling with it in 2010 and some in 2011. I expect Kodak
 will
 vaporize soon.


 I would liken Kodak's struggles more to amputating successive limbs trying
 to save the patient from gangrene.

 I understand why they ended up discontinuing Kodachrome. It was not
 economically competitive. Everybody *LOVED* Kodachrome, but they shot
 Ektachrome  Fujichrome because it was just as good and cost less.


 Fuji Reala was my all 'round fave though. Can't find it in 35mm at BH or
 Adorama anymore. You would think they would serve the boutique market as
 I see
 several folks on Flickr posting film stuff.


 Looks like it's available in 35mm through Amazon.com. I think Fuji is still
 making it. The page at their web site does NOT indicate it being
 discontinued.

 http://www.fujifilm.com/products/consumer_film/color_negativefilms_35mm/superia_reala/

 Film was more fun and best overall and I didn't have to mess with it for
 hours. I get tired of sitting at a computer. I do miss the days of film
 where I
 could fire and forget. If you had the right film, glass and exposure,
 all you
 needed was a competent lab to complete the magic.

  Technology has pushed me into digital, and, it is quite good. I am also
 spending less money per year than I was shooting film. Love the K5. Love
 the
 dedicated APS lenses like the SDM 16-50 f2.8 and the SDM 50-135 f2.8. Just
 got a
 DA 35 Limited. Lusting after a DA* 55 f1.4.

 Robert


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-11 Thread Toralf Lund

On 3/10/12 16:44, JC O'Connell wrote:

I have had my Pentax DSLR for 5 years now and only
shot one roll of film since buying it. I am wondering
if anyone is still using 35mm film regularly?
Yes. Although it depends a bit on how you define regularly; I must 
admit I don't seem shoot much in general these days. It's partly due to 
lack of time, but I suppose mostly lack of imagination and/or 
inspiration. Still, I did manage something like 20 rolls last year - 
most 35mm, but also a number of 120. Got an old beat-up Rolleiflex, plus 
I think I took the Holga for a spin once or twice, too.


I still can get slide film developed a couple of places in the area, by 
the way...


- T

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


RE: Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-11 Thread John Sessoms

From: Bob W


BTW, I hate to play the Grammar Nazi, but slide films and reversal
films aren't opposites, they are one and the same.

I hate to be a Semantic Nazi, but you were being a Semantic Nazi, not a
Grammar Nazi.


I hate to be a Linguistics Nazi, but Semantics is a part of Grammar, not
separate from it.

B


I think you misspelled ...

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-11 Thread Mark Roberts
Bob Sullivan wrote:

John,
More than price, Kodachrome's problems at the film scanner caused it's 
downfall.

I hated Kodachrome. Don't miss it at all.

 
-- 
Mark Roberts - Photography  Multimedia
www.robertstech.com





-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


RE: Anybody still shooting film? Kodachrome

2012-03-11 Thread JC O'Connell
Over 20 years ago, I once bought about 90 rolls of K64 marked down to
$0.10/roll.
Took me 10 years to shoot it all (freezer stored) . Loved that film and my
pro
Kodak carousel projector at the time. Wasn't scanning at the time or
it may have been much less fun. 

-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-11 Thread Larry Colen

On Mar 11, 2012, at 7:02 AM, Anthony Farr wrote:

 On 11 March 2012 23:10, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 
 bleach I need more bleach...
 
 
 
 Wishing to supply a link to a picture that would flesh out Larry's
 proposition, I did a Google image search for feet in mouth.  Hey,
 it's a big world, there must be a picture to illustrate anything a
 person can imagine.
 
 I usually have safe search set to off.  The results turned me right
 off further pursuit of the topic, I'm afraid.  Sheesh, talk about
 needing eye-bleach, .


Rule 34:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/6408927/Internet-rules-and-laws-the-top-10-from-Godwin-to-Poe.html


--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est





-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-11 Thread Jens
Ofcause, I do.
But, I would buy a digital, high resolution camera if I could - Perhaps a 
Pentax 645 or even better - a Phase One (costs about 50.000 USD here) if I 
could. Untill then I shoot high resolution images with my Pentax 67/67II. It's 
very good (when ever I can find a decent lab for scanning high end scans) and 
MUCH more affordable than a digital MF camera. It only costs me money, when I 
have a paying costumer, because the camera itself is very afforable - I payed 
only 1000 USD for the 67II and a 55mm.

And once in a while I shoot 35 mm film for black and white shots too.

Regards

Jens 

-- 
Treat others as you would like to be treated yourself.

On Mar 11, 2012 17:23 Toralf Lund tor...@toralf.net wrote:
 On 3/10/12 16:44, JC O'Connell wrote:
  I have had my Pentax DSLR for 5 years now and only
  shot one roll of film since buying it. I am wondering
  if anyone is still using 35mm film regularly?
 Yes. Although it depends a bit on how you define regularly; I must 
 admit I don't seem shoot much in general these days. It's partly due
 to 
 lack of time, but I suppose mostly lack of imagination and/or 
 inspiration. Still, I did manage something like 20 rolls last year - 
 most 35mm, but also a number of 120. Got an old beat-up Rolleiflex,
 plus 
 I think I took the Holga for a spin once or twice, too.
 
 I still can get slide film developed a couple of places in the area,
 by 
 the way...
 
 - T
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-10 Thread JC O'Connell
I have had my Pentax DSLR for 5 years now and only
shot one roll of film since buying it. I am wondering
if anyone is still using 35mm film regularly?

-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


RE: Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-10 Thread John Sessoms

From: JC O'Connell


I have had my Pentax DSLR for 5 years now and only
shot one roll of film since buying it. I am wondering
if anyone is still using 35mm film regularly?


Not very often, but I dig a roll out once in a while if I'm feeling 
particularly adventurous. I've got a refrigerator full of it.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-10 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 8:17 AM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
 Not very often, but I dig a roll out once in a while if I'm feeling
 particularly adventurous. I've got a refrigerator full of it.

I hadn't shot any for a long time, sold off most of what I had in 35mm
stock. Then I picked up the Leica M4-2 last Fall ... I've put about
eight rolls of film through it. I did a couple with this little Nikon
Pronea S my uncle gave me, and a couple of Impossible packs with the
Polaroid SX-70. I've used up my stock of XP2 Super and will order
another 20 rolls ... probably enough for five years with the Leica.

It's a lot of effort to shoot film ... and it's costly. I like it for
its unique qualities, but it's a complement to digital capture now.
-- 
Godfrey
  godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-10 Thread Matthew Hunt
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 10:44 AM, JC O'Connell hifis...@gate.net wrote:

 I have had my Pentax DSLR for 5 years now and only
 shot one roll of film since buying it. I am wondering
 if anyone is still using 35mm film regularly?

With a bit of rounding up on the time, my numbers are identical to
yours. My one roll of film was in the Canonet rangefinder, which I
miss more than my film SLRs.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-10 Thread George Sinos
Last roll of film I shot was October 2003.  gs

George Sinos

gsi...@gmail.com
www.georgesphotos.net
plus.georgesinos.com



On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Matthew Hunt m...@pobox.com wrote:
 On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 10:44 AM, JC O'Connell hifis...@gate.net wrote:

 I have had my Pentax DSLR for 5 years now and only
 shot one roll of film since buying it. I am wondering
 if anyone is still using 35mm film regularly?

 With a bit of rounding up on the time, my numbers are identical to
 yours. My one roll of film was in the Canonet rangefinder, which I
 miss more than my film SLRs.

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-10 Thread Dario Bonazza


George Sinos wrote:


Last roll of film I shot was October 2003.  gs


Mid-2003 here.

Dario

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-10 Thread luiz felipe

JC´s words...

I have had my Pentax DSLR for 5 years now and only
shot one roll of film since buying it. I am wondering
if anyone is still using 35mm film regularly?

-
J.C.O'Connell
hifisapi at gate.net
-




I still use it, not often. I do use it more often than I scan it - 
there are some 10 rolls waiting my attention rigth now.


Situation #1 - load some roll into my amphibious 35mm (Nikon AW35, 
almost done but still swimproof and clicking).
Situation #2 - load some roll into my disposable 35mm (EOS 500n, bonded 
baseplate, bent strap holders, scratched and gouged elsewhere).
Situation #3 - feel like showing off and load the Mx (twice a year or 
so, and no - the Mx is rather nice).


May stop using soon, since my Fuji supply is almost done and Kodak 
prices here and now are abbusive. Film of choice is any 200/ 400 ISO 
color negative under $7, since E-6 development is something from the 
distant past.


--
luiz felipe
luiz.felipe at luizfelipe.fot.br

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

RE: Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-10 Thread JC O'Connell


-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-

FWIW, the one roll I did shoot and scan was TMAX100
and the sharpness was impressive but even this fine
grained BW 100 speed film showed grain noisier than iso
200 images from my *istDS.
---
jco


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-10 Thread P. J. Alling
Every couple of months I run some 120 BW, (respooled onto 620 spools) 
through the Kodak Medalist II.  The negatives are gorgeous, the subject 
matter no so much.  A friend gave me a few rolls of expired and soon to 
be expired 35mm a couple of months ago.  I loaded up a MX, a LX and the 
Spotmatic F, and I don't think I shot a single frame.  On the plus side, 
all three of those cameras feel great in the hand.


On 3/10/2012 10:44 AM, JC O'Connell wrote:

I have had my Pentax DSLR for 5 years now and only
shot one roll of film since buying it. I am wondering
if anyone is still using 35mm film regularly?

-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-






--
Don't lose heart!  They might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid a 
lengthily search.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-10 Thread Adam Montoya
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 8:44 AM, JC O'Connell hifis...@gate.net wrote:
 I have had my Pentax DSLR for 5 years now and only
 shot one roll of film since buying it. I am wondering
 if anyone is still using 35mm film regularly?


I don't shoot it regularly. Up until last year my ZX-L was a backup to
my *DL so i always had some film ready to go. after Kodak introduced
Ektar 100 a few years back I bought some and basically fell in love
with it. Here  is a portrait i shot with it a while back:

http://www.mountainfort.com/People/Angela/10652967_c3VgqR#!i=741211272k=JmNudlb=1s=A

I also have been using the Adox CMS 20. I still develop my own BW
when it suits me.  A few years ago i purchased a Speedgraphic on ebay
for a low price. I've been experimenting with that as well. Fun stuff.

Now my *DL is a backup to my K5, so the film cameras don't make their
way into my camera bag as much, but I can't see every truly
terminating film use.

-Adam
-- 
http://www.mountainfort.com/

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-10 Thread Mark Roberts
Dario Bonazza wrote:

George Sinos wrote:

 Last roll of film I shot was October 2003.  gs

Mid-2003 here.

The last 35mm film I shot was 2 rolls in 2005. 

I still go through a few rolls of medium format slide film every year,
though.
 
-- 
Mark Roberts - Photography  Multimedia
www.robertstech.com





-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-10 Thread P. J. Alling

On 3/10/2012 2:46 PM, Adam Montoya wrote:

On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 8:44 AM, JC O'Connellhifis...@gate.net  wrote:

I have had my Pentax DSLR for 5 years now and only
shot one roll of film since buying it. I am wondering
if anyone is still using 35mm film regularly?


I don't shoot it regularly. Up until last year my ZX-L was a backup to
my *DL so i always had some film ready to go. after Kodak introduced
Ektar 100 a few years back I bought some and basically fell in love
with it. Here  is a portrait i shot with it a while back:

http://www.mountainfort.com/People/Angela/10652967_c3VgqR#!i=741211272k=JmNudlb=1s=A

I also have been using the Adox CMS 20. I still develop my own BW
when it suits me.  A few years ago i purchased a Speedgraphic on ebay
for a low price. I've been experimenting with that as well. Fun stuff.

Now my *DL is a backup to my K5, so the film cameras don't make their
way into my camera bag as much, but I can't see every truly
terminating film use.


Since Kodak just terminated Ektar 100, in it's own process of circling 
the drain, I hope there's a Fuji film you can renew you love with.



-Adam



--
Don't lose heart!  They might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid a 
lengthily search.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-10 Thread Adam Montoya
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 12:56 PM, P. J. Alling
webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 3/10/2012 2:46 PM, Adam Montoya wrote:

 On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 8:44 AM, JC O'Connellhifis...@gate.net  wrote:

 I have had my Pentax DSLR for 5 years now and only
 shot one roll of film since buying it. I am wondering
 if anyone is still using 35mm film regularly?

 I don't shoot it regularly. Up until last year my ZX-L was a backup to
 my *DL so i always had some film ready to go. after Kodak introduced
 Ektar 100 a few years back I bought some and basically fell in love
 with it. Here  is a portrait i shot with it a while back:


 http://www.mountainfort.com/People/Angela/10652967_c3VgqR#!i=741211272k=JmNudlb=1s=A

 I also have been using the Adox CMS 20. I still develop my own BW
 when it suits me.  A few years ago i purchased a Speedgraphic on ebay
 for a low price. I've been experimenting with that as well. Fun stuff.

 Now my *DL is a backup to my K5, so the film cameras don't make their
 way into my camera bag as much, but I can't see every truly
 terminating film use.


 Since Kodak just terminated Ektar 100, in it's own process of circling the
 drain, I hope there's a Fuji film you can renew you love with.

I didn't see any anouncement of them stopping Ektar production. Only
their reversal films.
From 
http://www.bjp-online.com/british-journal-of-photography/news/2156493/kodak-discontinues-colour-reversal-films;

She adds: This doesn't affect our Portra films, our Ektar and
black-and-white films.

-Adam
-- 
http://www.mountainfort.com/

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-10 Thread DagT
No, just medium format. But on the other hand I´m building a darkroom for that 
use these days.

35mm is too small, digital is better. I just made a small museum for the film 
stuff.
http://i106.photobucket.com/albums/m265/dagthrane/_DT20614-gammalt-utstyr.jpg

DagT

Den 10. mars 2012 kl. 16:44 skrev JC O'Connell:

 I have had my Pentax DSLR for 5 years now and only
 shot one roll of film since buying it. I am wondering
 if anyone is still using 35mm film regularly?
 
 -
 J.C.O'Connell
 hifis...@gate.net
 -

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-10 Thread P. J. Alling

On 3/10/2012 3:02 PM, Adam Montoya wrote:

On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 12:56 PM, P. J. Alling
webstertwenty...@gmail.com  wrote:

On 3/10/2012 2:46 PM, Adam Montoya wrote:

On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 8:44 AM, JC O'Connellhifis...@gate.netwrote:

I have had my Pentax DSLR for 5 years now and only
shot one roll of film since buying it. I am wondering
if anyone is still using 35mm film regularly?


I don't shoot it regularly. Up until last year my ZX-L was a backup to
my *DL so i always had some film ready to go. after Kodak introduced
Ektar 100 a few years back I bought some and basically fell in love
with it. Here  is a portrait i shot with it a while back:


http://www.mountainfort.com/People/Angela/10652967_c3VgqR#!i=741211272k=JmNudlb=1s=A

I also have been using the Adox CMS 20. I still develop my own BW
when it suits me.  A few years ago i purchased a Speedgraphic on ebay
for a low price. I've been experimenting with that as well. Fun stuff.

Now my *DL is a backup to my K5, so the film cameras don't make their
way into my camera bag as much, but I can't see every truly
terminating film use.


Since Kodak just terminated Ektar 100, in it's own process of circling the
drain, I hope there's a Fuji film you can renew you love with.

I didn't see any anouncement of them stopping Ektar production. Only
their reversal films.
 From 
http://www.bjp-online.com/british-journal-of-photography/news/2156493/kodak-discontinues-colour-reversal-films;

She adds: This doesn't affect our Portra films, our Ektar and
black-and-white films.

-Adam
I'm sorry, by their ages past naming convention, Ektar should by rights 
be a slide film.  I didn't realize it was a reversal film.


--
Don't lose heart!  They might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid a 
lengthily search.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-10 Thread Mark C

Missed the original post...

I'm still shooting it from time to time, though I have resolved to stop 
buying it. This afternoon I finished off a roll of Classic Pan 200 that 
has been sitting in a holga for several months. These days it is mostly 
120 film or the occasional 35mm BW roll. I bought 20 rolls of 120 Porta 
160 when Kodak went bust, and that will probably be the last color 120 I 
get. Several expired rolls of 35mm color print film in the freezer - 
some nice ones including an Agfa Ultra 50 and a Royal Gold 200. But I 
don't know when I'll use those. I gave my slide film away years ago but 
left one roll of Velvia 50 in the fridge that needs to be used someday...


On 3/10/2012 11:56 AM, luiz felipe wrote:

JC´s words...

I have had my Pentax DSLR for 5 years now and only
shot one roll of film since buying it. I am wondering
if anyone is still using 35mm film regularly?

-
J.C.O'Connell
hifisapi at gate.net
-



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-10 Thread Brian Walters

Quoting JC O'Connell hifis...@gate.net:


I have had my Pentax DSLR for 5 years now and only
shot one roll of film since buying it. I am wondering
if anyone is still using 35mm film regularly?



Not regularly.  I have a few rolls of film still in the freezer  
(nothing special - just basic 35 mm print film) and I put a roll  
through the LX a few months ago just because I thought I should (I've  
only had that camera for a year or so).


I really can't see me using film at all in the future, other than  
trying out an old camera that I might come across.




--
Cheers

Brian

++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-10 Thread Robert and Leigh Woerner
Hi PDML Gang,

I haven't shot much film since getting a K20D in 2009 and then a K5 in December 
2011.

 The cost of film is horrendous, and, Kodak keeps cutting their own throats. 
Kodachrome made them unique and bam, they discontinued it. I do like the Ektar 
and had quite a fling with it in 2010 and some in 2011. I expect Kodak will 
vaporize soon. 


 Fuji Reala was my all 'round fave though. Can't find it in 35mm at BH or 
Adorama anymore. You would think they would serve the boutique market as I 
see 
several folks on Flickr posting film stuff.

Film was more fun and best overall and I didn't have to mess with it for 
hours. I get tired of sitting at a computer. I do miss the days of film where I 
could fire and forget. If you had the right film, glass and exposure, all you 
needed was a competent lab to complete the magic.

 Technology has pushed me into digital, and, it is quite good. I am also 
spending less money per year than I was shooting film. Love the K5. Love the 
dedicated APS lenses like the SDM 16-50 f2.8 and the SDM 50-135 f2.8. Just got 
a 
DA 35 Limited. Lusting after a DA* 55 f1.4.

Robert




From: JC O'Connell hifis...@gate.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Sat, March 10, 2012 10:44:47 AM
Subject: Anybody still shooting film?

I have had my Pentax DSLR for 5 years now and only
shot one roll of film since buying it. I am wondering
if anyone is still using 35mm film regularly?

-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-10 Thread Robert and Leigh Woerner
That is a fantastic image set! I especially like the sepia one.



- Original Message 
From: Adam Montoya amont...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Sat, March 10, 2012 3:02:04 PM
Subject: Re: Anybody still shooting film?

On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 12:56 PM, P. J. Alling
webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 3/10/2012 2:46 PM, Adam Montoya wrote:

 On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 8:44 AM, JC O'Connellhifis...@gate.net  wrote:

 I have had my Pentax DSLR for 5 years now and only
 shot one roll of film since buying it. I am wondering
 if anyone is still using 35mm film regularly?

 I don't shoot it regularly. Up until last year my ZX-L was a backup to
 my *DL so i always had some film ready to go. after Kodak introduced
 Ektar 100 a few years back I bought some and basically fell in love
 with it. Here  is a portrait i shot with it a while back:


http://www.mountainfort.com/People/Angela/10652967_c3VgqR#!i=741211272k=JmNudlb=1s=A
A

 I also have been using the Adox CMS 20. I still develop my own BW
 when it suits me.  A few years ago i purchased a Speedgraphic on ebay
 for a low price. I've been experimenting with that as well. Fun stuff.

 Now my *DL is a backup to my K5, so the film cameras don't make their
 way into my camera bag as much, but I can't see every truly
 terminating film use.


 Since Kodak just terminated Ektar 100, in it's own process of circling the
 drain, I hope there's a Fuji film you can renew you love with.

I didn't see any anouncement of them stopping Ektar production. Only
their reversal films.
From 
http://www.bjp-online.com/british-journal-of-photography/news/2156493/kodak-discontinues-colour-reversal-films;


She adds: This doesn't affect our Portra films, our Ektar and
black-and-white films.

-Adam
-- 
http://www.mountainfort.com/

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-10 Thread Anthony Farr
On 11 March 2012 07:28, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:

 I'm sorry, by their ages past naming convention, Ektar should by rights be a
 slide film.  I didn't realize it was a reversal film.



Ekta wasn't a naming convention reserved just for transparency
film such as Ektachrome.  Other products used the Ekta prefix, among
them Ektacolor, Ektapress, Ektaprint, Ektaflex, as well as the Ektar
colour negative film already mentioned.

BTW, I hate to play the Grammar Nazi, but slide films and reversal
films aren't opposites, they are one and the same.  You must have
meant negative when you wrote reversal.  Simply explained,
practically all emulsions are natively negative. Slide films have a
reversal step during processing.  Hence, slide film is called reversal
film.

There are (were) a very small number of natively positive products.
Ilfochrome (formerly Cibachrome) is the one which most people will
know.  It is a dye destruction process, where the exposing light
breaks down Azo dyes and renders them unable to be developed, leaving
colour density only in unexposed areas.  Dyeline paper (the newer
alternative to blueprint paper) was a simpler type of the dye
destruction where the dye in the white areas was destroyed by UV
exposure while the remaining unexposed azo dyes were developed by
ammonia vapour, to become the black lines of architectural drawings.
Lastly there was a rarer process called autopositive or auto reversal.
 These materials had been exposed to the point of reversal, a point
of gross overexposure where any further exposure actually reduced the
latent image density, i.e. more light = less density.  This material
was definitely a lab material, not a general photographic film.  It
had very poor tonal characteristic but was useful in graphic arts
processes.

regards, Anthony

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-10 Thread Matthew Hunt
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 11:24 PM, Anthony Farr farranth...@gmail.com wrote:

 BTW, I hate to play the Grammar Nazi, but slide films and reversal
 films aren't opposites, they are one and the same.

I hate to be a Semantic Nazi, but you were being a Semantic Nazi, not
a Grammar Nazi.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anybody still shooting film?

2012-03-10 Thread Larry Colen



On 3/10/2012 8:30 PM, Matthew Hunt wrote:

On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 11:24 PM, Anthony Farrfarranth...@gmail.com  wrote:


BTW, I hate to play the Grammar Nazi, but slide films and reversal
films aren't opposites, they are one and the same.


I hate to be a Semantic Nazi, but you were being a Semantic Nazi, not
a Grammar Nazi.


Mark!




--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com (from dos4est)

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.